HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1976/06/15 Item 10. ' CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM NO
10
FOR MEETING OF: 6 15 76
ITEM TITLE: Resolution #8209 Approving Agreement with San Diego Transit Corp.
for Provisions of Intercity Bus Service During Fiscal Year 1976-77
~~~
SUBMITTED BY~ Director of Public Works/City Engineer ~ ~
l~~
ITEM EXPLANATION:
The attached San Diego Transit Corporation's proposal for FY1976-77 has been
evaluated by staff. The proposal shows a sharp increase of 194% over the
FY1975-76 charges for essentially the same service.
Table I is a comparison of key factors between FY's 1975-76 and 76-77.
Analysis of these factors show the following reasons for the 1940 increase
in service costs:
1. FACTOR. Gross cost per mile increases from $1.55 to $2.00 per mile.
Discussion: Table II shows a comparison of individual cost
items with San Diego Transit's explanations for these charges.
2. FACTOR. LVhile Route 29 shows a slight decrease in mileage and Route 32
remains about the same, Route 100 has a 26~ mileage increase.
Discussion: The rerouting of Route 29 into the County area
has caused a decrease in total mileage. Route 100 has a 260
increase in mileage, as it will be operating for a full year
in 1976-77.
(continued on supplemental page 2)
f•"'\/1 111'11TP\ ATTA/'\1 Ir11
CJ~r11a1 1 J HI IHl~r1CU
Agreement Resolution X Ordinance Plat Other X
Table
Environmental Document: Attached Submitted on
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve 1976-77 agreement between San Diego Transit Corporation and the
City of Chula Vista for intercity bus service during FY1976-77.
BOARD/ COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
A P P R O V E D
by the
City Council
COUNCIL ACTION pg
Chula Vista, Ce.1i~o~nia
~ S
~ 76
Dated ....................'................................................
Form A-113 (Rev 5-75)
Supplemental page 2
Agenda .Item No. 10
3. FACTOR. San Diego Transit is projecting a decrease in average
revenue per passenger from $.29 in FY1975-76 to $.267 per
passenger in FY1976-77.
Discussion: The decrease is caused by increased use of the
system by seniors and pass users who take advantage of the
lower fares.
4. FACTOR. San Diego Transit is projecting an overall Chula Vista rider-
ship decrease of 108,887 passengers.
Discussion: Route 100 alone shows a projected decrease of
44%. This significant passenger decrease is attributed to
an overestimation by SDTC planners for the first year's
operation of this route. The FY1976-77 projection of
58,082 passengers is based on actual counts. Although the
original projection was high, Route 100 has continued to
increase in passenger count each month it has been in
operation.
San Diego Transit has decreased their capital expense charge to the City
by 3~ a mile in FY1976-77. This 1270 decrease is brought about by a
decrease requirement for new buses during the coming year.
The Federal subsidy for FY1976-77 remains essentially the same as last
year. The formula used to allocate the UMTA operating funds is now under
discussion at CPO. There is a possibility the formula will be changed,
thereby increasing the amount of UMTA funds allotted to Chula Vista for
intercity service.
While a 1940 increase in overall cost is very hard to take, San Diego
Transit is the only alternative Chula Vista has for intercity bus service.
Since there is a possibility that a portion of this increase will be
eliminated by an increase in Federal subsidy through restructure of the
allocation formula, it is recommended that the proposed 1976-77 agreement
be approved.
H
W
a
q
H
z r
O h
H I
H cn io
wW0'~
O H to ~
a ;J H h
coal
oa~~n
U G h
U1 !: ~
H;JGri
1-itiU
Ul W
z~wa
a~~,U~
W FI H w
Ea CJ ~ ?~
Ia
OaW~I
C7 W ul FC
W r+\U
H ~ E1 Ul
C1HO~
Ua
U1 G
W
v
b oa ~ n°
t N do tr rJ
o
r N r-i r r-1
.
c..
C
J 1 + i i
h h W N to
i ~ h rn cn m
I W ~T o W
N ~O
W H f~ l0 In N r--1
~ ttil i -w N r ui h
~
)
.ZJ Ui ~O W ~O ~ N
h O N V
~ 00
r;J 1 M O V' h
z P, r i '
~, •~r
~n .-
H M o o
~
i
`y M V' r-I C9
U
va w m cr
c' h ~ v r
~
~ N .-I rl ri
I o N ~r ~
ts o ~ o ~
+~ h ~r .-1 ~r rn
N I
~ ~ o
M o
U i
.
ri r-I M
~
,~ ~ ~
j CO r-I u'1 ~D
~O CO r7 r-I t~
~i h r~ o~ N ao
~ I
1J tf1 ~fl O] Ol ~
O t~ N mil' C N
H ~1 ~
[~ t/}
CP do do dP c+a
N W M (A
~ ~
~ ri r-I .-i
r o ifl ~ r-i
,-i c~ h N
~ ~~ ~ l
U
J ri h rl ri r
o
Uzi W ~
+~ sa
N N ~
;r FL C~ Ql rI' l0 M
1 r•1 ~'1' cn ~n
h
h
h o ~r v~ rn
1 Ol O N (~
ci f i
~
r
~ 'r ~
k, ~
~ Sa
c~J ~J ~o
a P' N
~
~ o
i i .
.
i
h r-I .i ri
~ O o 0 0
I O o O O
N iU h N N N N
Uri
U r~i ~1 t/)•
G7
~ 3•i ~
t
`^
~
u
a i u
~
i
~
~ ri ri ~ ~
i
C
4 ~
a . ~
an C ~
~ ~
1 c
v i
U I 1 + +
h m N ~ ~
N h lfl ri lfl N
~i7 CJ I rl rn ~r rn
Cl~a u
~
f
~_, .,~ h ri r-i u o
~
~H [r, ri N
r,}
~ ;."7 O M r"1 M Q~
,,, N
~ h
OJ r-1 .-i
.--1
h .1 ~n a•
ri N
a
~ Q~ N O r
E
N M O
H E
NN'N
0
E
F>;
w
F
H
(n
ti,
O
L
W
H
Q
z
U)
a
O
H
U
W
H
H U
C.7 R,
~ O
E-~ 2
O
m W
a H
~ ~
O w
U t~
H
U]
O
U
N
m
rJ
U
C
.~
c~
.U
.~
m
C
i~
U
a
r^,
U
ro
C
O
-.-I
iJ
r~
r-1
«,
r.
.~
r-I
fl
l-:
~,
0
7.
W
N
~r
N
U
r_
t^
j
r.
1
/'
.~ ~
ti I C-~
d
N
>~
v
a
X
v
~.
O
.~
+~ ~
?i cn
R. N
N R.
~ ~
~ N
RY •~•I
~ b
~1
v ~
U U1
N G
f~. •~
4)
>~ i0
.~
~ t~
~ ~~
Q ,~
N
11 ~
1-I O
rd •~
f],
3 ~
o Q.
>~
N
N rti
•~+ 3
a
N N
i-1 ~
.r1 .,~
N Vl
•ri ..i
~i
H H
~k
~~
~•
San Diego
WE'RE GOING YDUR WAY!
100 SIXTEENTH STREET
NI AILING ADDRESS: P. O. BOX 2511
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92112
The Hanarable Thomas D. Hamilton
Mayor, City of Chula Vista
276 - 4th Avenue
San Diega, Ca. 92010
Dear Tom:
ADMINISTRATIVE 714-238-0100
CHARTER 714-238-0500
INFORMATION 714-239-8161
May 24, 1976
Attached you will find a copy of the proposed "Second Amendment"
to this year's operating agreement. This amendment reflects
the reduction in cost of $2,619 resulting from the extension
of Route 29 through Castle Park, which was implemented an
April 4, 1976. We need a resaluti~ a~ ~ ~~~~ this amendment.
Also attached is a copy of our proposed operating agreement
far FY 77. This new agreement indicates a need of $243,543
from your LTF apportionment.
Once again, due to certain timing deadlines, I would like to
urge a resolution authorizing this FY 77 agreement, with the
understanding that we will came back later in the year with an
amendment to reflect any changes in service that may be deemed
necessary ar desirable. Far example, Route 100 Express may
need same serious consideration before our September "Shake-up"
(change of schedules).
We will certainly be available to work with you and the staff
to make any adjustments you desire throughout the year.
Sincerely,
Claude R. Page '~''"~' v ~"
Transit Coordi nator ~~ 1,,~ ~~
~' cn i .
~
`~
,
~ ..
~~
CRP : cm ~ ~~
- ~ - {.,
3 '~
Attachments rl ,~
~i v:
~
cc: Councilmen Lauren I. Egdahl Will T. Hyde `mss
James E. Habel Frank A. Scott
City Manager Lane Cale
City Clerk