Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1976/06/08 Item 11CITY OF CHULA VISTA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM NO 11 FOR MEETING OF: 6-8-76 ITEM TITLE: Resolution#8194 Establishing Increased Greens Fees at the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course SUBMITTED BY~ Director of Parks and Recreation ITEM EXPLANATION BACKGROUND On May 7, 1976 during budget sessions, while reviewing the proposed expenditures for the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course, Council dis- cussed staff's recommendation concerning increased greens fees (see attached report; Proposal B) and directed that a resolution be brought back establishing these fees. DISCUSSION Attached is a resolution noting the Council approved increase in greens fees in italics. It should be noted that all daily fees were increased 25 cents per 9 holes and 50 cents per 18 holes. In addition to the daily increase, this resolution establishes a reservation fee for advance start- ing times. This fee is $1.00 per starting time and will be assessed to all advance reservations, except for tournaments and leagues cosponsored by the Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Department, and the Chula Vista Men's and Women's Golf Clubs. All commitments made prior to July 1, 1976 will be honored. Monthly ticket rates were not affected by this rate increase. f-\/1 111"\ITI'\ ATTA/'\1 Irl"\ CJ~r11 [f I I J H I I Hl.l"ICU Agreement Resolution X Ordinance Plat Other X Environmental Document: Attached Submitted on STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution establishing increased greens fees. BOARD/ COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION COUNCIL ACTION Approved with amendment eleminating the surcharges (Proposal "A") Form A-113 (Rev. 5-75) . f. D~;T£: Apri 1 15, 19i 6 T0: Emersor, Naii; DirAr.tar of Parks and Pecreation F~1Jl~i: David 3i°adstr~?~~, Parks Sttperinfendc~nt .~', ---_~-~~ SU3J£CT: Proposai s ~'oi, Increase i n Greene ~'e~s Th~~ f,Jiio~.ting }~ropos3'ts for oeneratinc~ acid~rti-~r?1 revent:~,s to offs:~t tEio de~ i:: ~ ~~ i n ~~ he i 9y~i-7 ; r:~ i .f C~~ttrst~ ht:dclet are su!>>~:. teed •~ or your evai uati on. 1975-•7i Go7f Course bucic~Y~:, less Cour:cii approved saiary increases: £x.nendi tares (i n~,' ~cdi r-,cr bond payment) .. ...... ?_~~, i 9'.; Rcv~~nues (greens ~~ees ar~d restaurant/~,~r) ..... ?_69,56f) i~~~ticipated defic;t ............................ ~ X,630 R£COMP-1£i';CATI OI~IS Proposal A i. Ir,cr~>ase fee for ai i ~.iassi•ficatians- ?_5 cents per round (~? i~eie) and 50 cents par round (i~ hoit~). 2. rssess a 31.00 per player fee for tourname~:t play. 9 h~~le play: i7,?'!~~ rou:~ds X .25 ............. ~ Lr,30(l •t 3 mole play: <<6,?_4~C roi:nds X . 5~ ............ ?_3,~1 0 Tournamen#: pi a y: 7, 9r) X 3~i . 00 .. .. ..... , .. 7, ~8n ~70TAL ~5,~9~* Tc~ta'I revcn~4es (proposed budget) ............. ti2f>>a,56C To~ai revenues (Pr<~posai A) ...... ... .... 3 ~49!~:` Tt)TAZ~REIr~~IUES ~`_` `° $30S,05C~ EYPEPd~Iit''~FS _~"'1, 1 9f) A.liICIP;~ I ri} S(!;-;PLUS 5 + i>,~ 6(! Prnnos?1 D 1 . Incre~ se .fee for ail class;7=ica~tions: 2:~ ct~~,ts Pier round (S hale) and 57 c~~r~ts ;per round (l~ hole}. 2. t',ssess a ~'i . ~?0 fe~a per foursome far al i ucly-ance resarvztians. 9 h~l e p1 ~y: •18 hate ;)i a_~: ~l~ota 7 revenues 'total revc~nu~7s i7,2i0 rounds X .25 G6,?~0 rounds X .50 30 ;~^r day X 350 day.. t ~i .')~:~ 7;1Tf~!_ (prc,pn~;eci t~~:dget) F'rop~sal ±;} ~ ~,30'I ??,?.i0 i 0, 50~t ?.b9, 55u 3 `' TOTAL R£1~'E"TIES ~3Q7,~:~7~? £Y,PE"!!?IT1)Rc5 •,nc; 3 i nP AfdTICIPt;; ED Sti~PLUS ~i,38O PeaF;cr,~_s~1 C This would be an entirely new concept in our fee structure, basically patterned after the one presently in use at the City of Coronado h1unicipal Golf Course. (See attached resolution.) ~~ Page two (Proposals fen Increase in Greens Fees) ~ ~• The recommended cha,i:les are: i. Ii~~plement a quarterl!, standard r~onts~ly tic'.~:et. 2. Re tai n the Sen i c,r Citizen and Student ~iontiv1y 7i cket on a monthly ~~,-3sis. 3. F+dop-t a fee schedule as follows: a. Eiimir~ate 9 hole play b. Charcie a f1a•t fee for svee~;day and weekend play (to be determined; ~5. C~3, for example) . c. Incorporate tavilight hours for weekdays, weekends and holidays; standard and daylight savings time (example: ~3.C0) d. Charge an additional fe? far reservations and group or tournament play. e. Establish specific times for the i•ten's C1ua and the 1Jomen's Club for tournament play at regular fees. rn~.+urn,-rc If Proposal C wore adopted, it would be difficul~ to project the impact on grQens fee revenue. Ilt least one year of experience would be required to compile sufr""icient factual information to s+,bstaniiate the benefits from the proposed changes. In staff's opinion, Proposal C is tine mast economical long range plan because a reduction in ±he number of players prE~sently taking advantacle of the Standard Monthly iick2t ti~ould generate a definite increase in the revenue from greens fees. Elimination of 9 ho1~.~ play should induce addi- tional '1~3 hole play and the fees for reservations and tournament play wi11 undoubted'ty generate additional funds. The foregoing proposals are necessary? due to spiralinc; costs for main tenance and rommod•ities. It has always been sttaff's desire to offer to th,~ general public the roost economical gree~-s foe structure in the County, but the high cost of operation necessitates some adjustments. DB:mw n.