Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1977/07/26 Item 18CITY OF CHULA VISTA . ' Item No._ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT For meeting of 7/26/77 ITEM TITLE Resolution~~~("- Fund to Test th Appropriating the Additional Sum of $4,000 for the NIMLO Litigation Constitutionality of the Unemployment Compensation Act of 1976 SUBMITTED BY City Attorney ITEM EXPLANATION (4/5TH'S VOTE REQUIRED YES x NO ) For many weeks, the Council has maintained the position of contributing no more than $1,000 to the litigation fund seeking to test the Federal Unemployment Compensation Act. Council, while certainly justified, has felt that that is a rather substantial sum to be requested when more than $1-1/2 million has now been built up in the NIMLO litigation trust fund. I concur with the Council's reasoning, but that sum is insignificant when weighed against the fact that a failure to overturn the law would cost the City in the first year $78,000 and would be substantially higher thereafter. Therefore, I strongly urge that we do become a party to the lawsuit and appropriate an additional $4,000 so that we may send in the $5,000. I would especially draw your attention to the resolution adopted by the NIMLO Board of Trustees wherein they state as follows:. "NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the NIMLO Litigation Trust Fund make an immediate refund to each participating jurisdiction under 25,000 population of all amounts contributed in excess of the larger of $.05 per person of population or $250; and that a general refund pro rata to all participating jurisdictions be deferred for future consideration by the NIMLO Litigation Trustees; and that at all times the Trust Fund shall be maintained in a liquid, interest-bearing medium under the exclusive control of the Operations Committee until disbursement is necessary." It seems evident that the cities will eventually receive a reimbursement on a pro rata basis. Further, as I have indicated, using the formula method for calculating Chula Vista's proportionate contribution, the sum of $2900 would be required anyway, so that we are being asked on the flat rate basis to contribute $2000 more than the smaller cities would be contributing based upon the formula. EXHIBITS Agreement x Resolution x Ordinance Plat Notification List Other ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Attached Submitted on FINANCIAL IMPACT Appropriate $4000 from the unappropriated reserves of the General Fund STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve resolution BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION COUNCIL ACTION f -~ l Form No, F-229 . ~ ,l `~? 3 CERTIFICATE CF CITY/DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Certification of. i3nap ~-opriated Ealance 100 0150 5202 I HEREB`l CEF.TIEY that appropriation of funds for the. reselution is available in the came into the Treasury, and is the money required for t'::e urpcse set forth i .i the attached. reasury, or is articipat~dto therwise unapprc~}riatec?. Amount S 5,000.00 r~und General Purpose NIMLO Litigation Fund Eidder N/A Director of Financfl !~~ The City of ChuJ.a ~'i sta Date By Certification of UnencumberQd 3alance I i3F.REBY CEkTIFY that the indebtedness and :;bligation to be incurred by the contract or agreement autl:ori~ed by th~~ attached resolution can De incurred ~.~ithout the Violation of any Gf she provisions of the Charter of t;~c City cf Chula ViStc':, o t?-.e Constitution Or the laws of the Statevf Ca'_ifCr:'~id, ~~-i4: sufficient monies have been appropriated for the pur:pos~~~ of` :~ui:: ;;ontract, that sufficient monies to me~:t the oblic~~3tio::s of th,.c co:z`raci are actually in the Treasury, or ars a.nticipateta to aoR~,~ into the Treasury to the credit of the appropriation froT~ whici: the same are to be dra',an, and that said'r:~onies now actuaiiy -n th Treasury, togetizer with the monies anticipated to come i:ltc) t?'ie Treasury, to the credi` of said appropriation a~-e cthorw~.sc unencnrik~ered. fimount Not to EXCeed $ Director of Firar_c~: T?-.e City of Chula Vi :~~::a. Date F' .nd rurpose 33idder By Dept./Activity Certificate: ?ir.,, 3