HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1989-13957 RESOLUTION NO. 13957
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO THE
CERTIFIED CHULA VISTA LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND
BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL
OF SAID AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL
COMMISSION
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as
fol 1 ows:
WHEREAS, on January 11, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of
Chula Vista conducted a public hearing to consider Amendment No. 7 to the
Certified Local Coastal Program and Bayfront Specific Plan and approve the
proposed LCP Amendment No. 7; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista conducted a
public hearing on January 24, 1989, and considered Amendment No. 7 to the
Certified Chula Vista LCP.
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista intends to carry out the certified
Chula Vista LCP in a manner consistent with the California Coastal Act.
HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista hereby:
1. Approves Amendment No. 7 to the Certified Chula Vista Local
Coastal Program as presented in Exhibit B hereto attached.
2. Authorizes submittal of said Amendment No. 7 to the California
Coastal Commission as an amendment that will take effect
automatically upon Commission approval.
Presented by Approved as to form by
WPC 3933H
EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED .~IENDMENTS
to the
CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
Parts I and II
December 12, 1988
PART I
DRAFT
Amendments to Certified Chula Vista LCP (Part I)
The following amenements (Part I) to the certified City of Chula Vista Local
Coastal Program concern only the property located north and south of "j"
Street between Interstate 5 and Bay Boulevard. These new provisions allow a
maximum increase in development intensity and building height if ~evelopment
meets certain conditions (listed in attached Appendix C).
Additions to the existing Local Coastal Program are indicated by underlining.
ISpecific Plan)
Section 19.85.01 - BUilding Height
The maximum heights of buildings shall be controlled by Nap 2, Building Height
Controls, and shall be measured in stories or feet, whichever is less:
Two-story maximum - 22 feet.
Four-story maximum - 44 feet.
Five-story maximum - 55 feet.
Eight-story maximum - 88 feet.
Twelve-story conditional - a maximum of 132 feet, provided that the
increase in height above 88 feet can be shown to produce a visually and
environmentally superior solution for a visually prominent and
resource-sensitive location, and which adheres to the following standards:
a. Linear slab or cruciform design 'shall be avoided in favor of a
stepped building form.
b. The ~uilding shall enclose a south facing public outdoor space.
Special Condition #1 - a maximum height of 70 feet is allowed within 400
feet of the intersection of "E" Street and Bay Boulevard in the southwest
corner of such intersection.
An architectural focal point such as a tower or other vertical form
reaching a height of (up to) 70 feet shall be permitted in the office park
north of I!arina Parkway subject to site and design review ~o consider and
pro~ect public views from ~larina Parkway to San Diego ~ay. This vertical
elempnt will ~e a visual landmark ieen~ifying ~he core area of the
Hidbayfront.
-I-
S~ecial Condition #2 - A maximum height of 44' is allowed in the northwest
quadrant of Bay Boulevard an~ "E" Street, provided that said structure is
at least 400' north of "E" Street and does not contain more than 20% of
the allowed FbR for the total site.
Special Condition #3 - A maximum building height shall be 45 feet provided
specific site development plans are recommended by the C~ula Vista Design
Review Committee and a~proved by the Chula Vista Reoevelopment ~ency
based on guidelines listea in Appenaix C.
-2-
(Specific Plan)
TABLE !
~0PMENT INTIE. NSITY AND SITIN(;
Usable
M~n(mum Exterior Floor- Open
Lot Area Residential Prone S]de Side Area Space per
(s,f.) Density Yards Yards Yards, Ratio Res. d,u.
Residential 3,500 IS*)0 d.u,/acre 15 10 -- -- 400
Commercial; Office Park 7,OOO -- l0 $0 -- 0.5]
Commercial: Highway Related 5,000 -- J0 2 _ 2 _ 2 0.25 2 __
Commercjdh Marine Related 3,000 -- J0 -- -- 0.25
Commercial: Specialty Related I0~0Q0 -- 20 tO -- 0.25
Commerciah Hotel 20,000 -- 50 30 -- 0.5
industrial; E~Jsines-$ Park 10,0OO -- 30 i5 20 0.5
lndustria ,.Genera 20,000 -- 20 15 20 0.5
1Transfer of development rights shall be permitted to allow a FAR of ,65 in portions of
the office park north of biarina Parkway with a reduction of FAR on parcels of equal size
in the office park area south of Marina Parkway to .35 to matn~ain an overall FAR of
.5,
2;n the event additional land area is gained for development of properties located
the northeast and southeast Corners of BB:/ Boulevaro and J Street by coverinq tMe
ad,lacen( orainage channel, the on-site F.A.R. and setDocks may vary in accoroance with
s~eclat condition =3 (sec. 19.85.01) and appendix C.
TABLE 2
PERMITTED SIGNS
(See also Bayfront Sign Program)
Land Use
::~SIDENTIAL Ill qJ J ~ Jl j
;OMM~RCIAL: OFFIC~ PA~ t t I l
COMME~C:AU: ~EC)AUTY ~TAIL r ) [ ~ ~ ~ ~
JN~STRIAL: BUSI~SS PA~ J ~ ~ ~ J
-4-
(Specific Plan)
~ppendix C
GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF
BAY BOULEVARD AND "J" STREET
Specific development plans for the development of property located at the
northeast and southeast corners of Bay Boulevard and "j" Street shall be
subject to Design Review Committee recommendation and Agency approva| based on
the following guidelines:
1. Building setbacks shall be:
Parcel 2 Parcels 3/4
~t (Southeast
Corner) Corner)
a. "J" Street (to maintain view 50 ft. 30 ft.*
~orridor)
b. Bay Boulevard 30 ft. 30 ft.
c. Adjacent to I~5 Freeway 50 ft. 25 ft.
d. From intersection of
"J" Street and Bay
Boulevard (measured
perpendicular to an-
gular corner property
line) 60 ft. 60 ft.
*50 ft. setback required for construction exceeding a building height of
28 feet.
2. Maximum building height shall be 45 feet.
3__. Architectural features such as a tower, with floor areas
of the ground floor area, may exceed the 45 ft. height m ft.
Note: For calculation of the tower area, land over the drainage channel
between Lots 3 and 4 and on Lot ~ shall be included in ground floor
calculations to the extent the second floor spans the channel.
One architectural tower shall be allowed on Parcel 2 and one on the
combined Parcels 3 and 4.
4. Landscaping of the site shall be 15 - 20% of the total lot area.
5_. Minimum landscaping depths along street frontages shall be 15 ft. in width.
6. Elevations facing the freeway shall be articulated in massing or
architectural treatment.
7. Pedestrian linkages shall be provided to connect both sides of "J" Street
as well as linking the projects to the Bayfront development.
8~. The maximum floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for Lot 2 and the adjoinin~ lot to
the east ("the channel") when combined shall be .55.
9. The maximum F.A.R. for Lots 3 and 4 (the southeast parcel) when combined
with the adjoining parcel ("the channel") shall be .50.
lO. Compact parking stalls shall be permitted with dimensions of 7.5 feet wide
by 16 feet in length. The number of these stalls may be authorized to a
maximum of 20% of the required parking.
WPC 3807H
(Land Use Plan)
TABLE 2: PROPOSED DEVELOPHENT INTENSITY
DEVELOPABLE
ACRES DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY
Subarea I--D Street Fill 73,5
Residential 19,0 15 to 30 du/acre
Commercial--Marine-Related 21,1 FAR 0,25
Commercial--Marina +6,0 NA
Subarea II--Gunpowder Point 40,8
Commercial--Hotel/Conference 14,03 FAR 0,52
Subarea III--Midbayfront 99,0
Residential 18,1 15 tO 30 du/acre
Commercial--Office/Park and 44,7 FAR 0,55
Specialty Retail
Commercial--Highway-Related 15,2 FAR 0.25
Industrial Business Park 21,0 FAR 0,5
Landscaped Parking Bonus Provisions3
Subarea IV--Industrial Area 26,2
Commercial--Highway-Related 3.1 FAR 0,25~
Industrial/Utilities 14.2 Per Existing Zoning4
Landscaped Parking. 8,9 Bonus Provisions3
Subarea VI--Outparcels 18,8
Industrial 18,8 Per Existing Zoning4
du/acre = Dwelling units per net acre of developable land,
FAR = Floor area ratio or ratio of gross building area to net developable land
area,
NA = ~ot applicable.
1 ~arina: An allowance of approximately 4,0 acres site is made for a
recreational boating marina or a small commercial marina repair and
storage facility, This area does not include upland support facilities
covered by the marine commercial designation.
2 26.8 acres of uplan~ area are excluded for purposes of establishing
permitcod FAR.
3 Bonus Provisions: Increased development is proposed on parcels adjacent
to the areas where long term provisions are Secured to utilize ~he RC~
for parkin~ ant parking areas are landscaped per prevailing Standards,
4 Existing Zoning: Intensity of use does not vary from existing Chula
Vista zoning code,
Transfer of development rights shall be permitted to allow a FAR of .65
in portions of the office park area north of Marina Parkway with
reduction of FAR on parcels of equal size in the office park area so~
of Marina Parkway to .35 to maintain an overall FAR of .5.
In the event additional land area is ~ained for development of properties
located at the northeast and southeast corners of Bay. Boulevard and
Street by covering adjacent drainage channels, t~e onsite FAR and
setbacks may vary in accoroance with Special Conoition ~3 (Sec. 19.85.01)
and Appendix C of the Bayfront Specific Plan.
-8-
(Land Use Plan)
_ ,., ~:=..:,5
=~ ,.=__=:=-
, . -=---.-o ~t~
i, 'i!~'.:li~~~.. '~
-' -" ~i~i!,!'!i, .~-: ~=~ ~
":.'-'=:=:Et '~*' '
~ -- 'r:::' ;~ ~ I ':'i:I'~;'F
· ::_~ _~ _~
..... ~, , ~, ' >, ~
'1
f
-9-
~Land Use Plan)
DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY
The proposed intensity of development is based on height limitations, parking
requirements, on-site open space or landscape provisions, traffic capacity,
and economic feasibility. The intensity of development consequently varies by
land use type.
1. Height Limits. The recommended building heights for the Bayfront are
indicated in Figure 5. The prevailing height limit is four stories
throughout most of the Bayfront. This limit allows for extensive open
space and landscape provisions without exceeding the traffic capacity of
the proposed circulation improvements. There are areas in which the
height limit varies from prevailing provisions, calling for bot~ lower
and taller height recommendations, due to program requirementS,
environmental management objectives, or physical form and appearance
objectives. These variances include the following;
Gateways. To achieve a "gateway,I' or sense of entry to the Bayfront and
relate it to the existing new development along Bay Boulevard, the areas
immediately adjacent to the E Street and J Street bridges are recommended
to stay bet~yeen one and two storiesX except in accordance with special
conditions set forth in Section 19.85.01 of the'Bayfront Specific Plan.
PART II
Draft
AMENDMENTS TO THE CERTIFIED CHULA VISTA LCP (PART II)
The following amendments to the certified City of Chula Vista Local
Coastal Program are proposed to clarify and simplify the performance standards
and processing requirements for coastal development permits. These amendments
do not provide for any changes in the type, location, density, or intensity of
use~'~ermitted by the existing Local Coastal Program.
Additions to existing language in the Local Coastal Program are indicated
by underlining; deletions are indicated by ~W~.
1. Amendment 1: Grading
[A. Land Use Plan:]
BASIC UTILITY SERVICE AND GRADING OBJECTIVES
The following general objectives are proposed to guide the future design and
implementation of utility services and areawide grading:
1. Provide adequate sizing of utility lines to assure sufficient capacity for
the most intensive users.
2. Minimize the import of soil to that necessary for the protection of
developable areas from flooding during ¢~¢~ the lO0 year design
storm~ ~/~/~/~~X
3. Protect existing natural resources from ~ any significant adverse
impact~ during ~ construction ~.
4. Provide for an adequate on-site storm drainage system to preclude
stormwater ~¢ from development from draining directly into
wetland habitat without adequate filtering of sediments or
pollutants.
5. Prohibit all grading and stockpiling of earthen materials between
November 1 and March 31 except where proposed land development meets the
requirements of Section 19.87.07 of the Bayfront Specific Plan.
BASIC UTILITY SERVICE AND GRADING OBJECTIVES (CHAPTER III)
Objective 4. "Provide for an adequate on-site storm drainage system
to preclude drainage from development from entering directly into
wetland habitat without adequate filtering of sediments or
pollutants."
Objective 5. Prohibit all grading and stockpiling of earthen
materials between November 1 and March 31 except where proposed land
development meets the requirements of Section 19.87.07 of th6
Bayfront Specific Plan.
-1-
[B. Specific Plan:]
Section 19.87.03 - Utility Service and Grading Objectives
Map 4, Utility System, shall control the location of sewered water systems.
The following objectives shall guide the design and implementation of utility
services and areawide grading:
1. Provide adequate sizing of utility lines to assure sufficient capacity for
the most intensive users.
2. Minimize the import of soil to that necessary for the protection of
developable areas from flooding during concurrent storms and high-tide
conditions.
3. Protect existing natural resources from ~ any significant adverse
impact~ during construction ~.
4. Provide for an adequate on-site storm drainage system to preclude drainage
from development from entering directly into wetland habitat without
'adequate ~iltering o~ sediments or %~/~ pollutants.
5. Provide appropriate slope gradients in critical locations to ensure proper
drainage.
6. Prohibit all gradin~ and stockpiling of earthen materials between
November 1 and March 31 except where proposed land development meets the
requirements of Section 19.87.07 of the Bayfront Specific Plan.
Section 19.87.07-Grading and Drainage
1. Development on the Midbayfront ~/~/~ shall import earth to ensure
building pads above the 100-year flood level {about elevation l~ 6) and
above higher high-tide level. The grading concept for imported fiT1 for
the Midbayfront is shown in Nap 5, Land Form and Drainage.
2~. Special care shall be taken in development proposals #~/~ adjacent to
wetland habitat ~ to avoid or minimize ~¢~ problems of
silting and oi~ or chemical ~eakage. Some diversion of ~l~ water is
necessary and one or more desilting/retention basin(s) may be requ'~'~'d in
development proj'ects to protect and enhance the biological and watT~
quality of the wetland 'habitat. A major ~ desiltation basin
shall be buHt in the Midbayfront to accept surface drainage and provide
for desilting~ during and after construction of development projects
and for oil and chemical entrapment. LPage 38]
-2-
~¢¢~I7~X ]Page 38]
3__. All development for properties within the coastal zone shall comply with
the following requirements:
a. A grading plan that incorporates runoff and erosion control
procedures to be utilized during all phases of project development
shall be prepared and submitted concurrently with subdivision
improvement plans or planned unit development plans where such
- development is proposed to occur on lands that will be graded or
filled. Such a plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer
and shall be designed to assure that runoff rates will be controlled
to minimize the potential for siltation in wetlands. The erosion
control measures and hydrolo~y calculations shall be based on the
six-hour, ten-year design storm, or on the storm intensity designated
in the City of Chula Vista's Subdivision Manual, in the event that
the Subdivision Manual requirement is more stringent. Runoff control
sha~l be accomplished by establishing on-site or at suitable nearby
locations catchment basins, detention basins, and siltation traps
along with energy dissipating measures at the terminus of storm
drains, or other similar means of equal or greater effectiveness.
b__~. Sediment basins (debris basins, desilting basins, or silt traps)
shall be installed in conjunction with the initial grading operations
and maintained through the development process as necessary to remove
sediment from runoff waters draining from the land undergoing
development. Areas disturbed but not completed prior to November 1
including graded pads and stockpiles, shall be suitably prepared to
prevent excessive soil loss during the late fall and winter seasons.
All graded areas shall be stab~|ized prior to November l, by means of
native vegetation, if feasible, or by other suitable means approved
by the City. The use of vegetation as a means to control site
erosion shall be accomplished pursuant to plans and specifications
prepared by a licensed landscape architect or other qualified
professional. E~osion control utilizing vegetation may include, but
i~"not limited to, seeding, mulching, fertilization, and irrigation
within sufficient time prior to November 1 to provide landscape
-3~
coverage that is adequate to achieve the provisions of this policy.
Temporary erosion control measures, shall include the use of berms,~
interceptor ditches, tiltered inlets, debris basins, slit traps, or
other similar means of equal or greater effectiveness. From November
1 to March 31, grading may be permitted provided the applicant
conforms to the requirements of subsection C and submits monthly
documentation within two weeks following the end of the preceding
month to the City Engineer of the condition of the erosion control
procedures for graded pads, slopes and stockpiles whenever
precipitation during the month exceeds two (2) inches.
c. From November 1 to March 31, grading may occur in phased increments
as determined by the City Engineer provided all of the following
requirements have been met:
(1) The increments shall be limited to those areas that have been
prepared to control the effects of soil erosion. Con~
measures, such as sedimentation basins, detention basins and
other facilities, Shall be Scheduled and placed in a Sequence
that shall minimize and control the offsite transportation of
sediments. Such erosion control measures shall be installed for
such increments prior to commencing any grading that would be
performed during the period between November 1 and March 31.
(2) The applicant shall post a deposit, for such areas to be graded,
which shall remain in force and effect for one year after final
inspection approval of grading by the City. The deposit shall _
be sufficient to cover the costs of any remedial grading and
~planting of veqetation, including any restoration of wetlands,
or other environmentally sensitive I~abitat areas adversely
affected by the failure of the erosion control measures required
herein, as determined by the City Engineer. The deposit will
inure to the benefit of the City in case of noncompliance as
determined by the City Engineer.
{3) The applicant agrees to provide daily documentation to the City
Engineer of the condition of the erosion control procedures for
any 24-hour period in which precipitation exceeds 0.25 inches.
Such documentation shall be provided within five working days ot
said 24-hour period. Failure to provide such documentation ot
the occurrence of any significant discharge of sediments or
silts in violation of this policy shall constitute automatic
grounds for suspension of the applicant's qrading permits(s)
during the period of November 1 to March 31.
4. Erosion Control Monitoring Program for Chula Vista Coastal Zone Areas
Draining Directly Into Wetlands.
a. Overall field review of grading operations will De performed by the
' City Engineer on each grading project in the Coastal Zone.
b. Field review of erosion control devices, sedimentation basins,
- detention basins, and ~andScaping will be made by the City Engineer
prior to the advent of the rainy season, and throughout the rainy
season as necessary to monitor grading operations phased between
November 1 and ~arch 31. The City Engineer shall document
non-compliance of projects with the grading and erosion control
requirements and correct problems with funds from the deposit posted
by the applicant.
c. The City Engineer will periodically review and prepare a report on
the etfectiven~ss of the runoff and erosion control measures for
areas within the Chula Vista Coastal Zone, The initial report shall
be completed within two years following February 1989 and thereafter
six months prior to any scheduled review by the California Coastal
Commission of the Local Coastal Program for the City of Chula Vista.
A copy of the report shall be submitted to the Chula Vista City
Council and to the Executive Director of the Coastal Commission.
2. Amendment 2: De Hinimis Permit Waivers
[Specific Plan]
Section 19.92.03-Applicability
(a) Except as provided in Section 19.92.03 and Section 19.92.04 ~I~, any
~1~¢~ person wishing to undertake a development in the coastal zone
shall obtain a coastal development permit in accordance with the
provisions of this article, in addition to any other permit required by
law. Development undertaken pursuant to a coastal development permit
shall conform to the plans, specifications, terms and conditions approved
in granting the permit. The procedures described herein may be used in
conjunction with other procedural requirements of the City ~
~ provided that the minimum requirements as sp~ied herein
are assured. [Page 87]
(~) The Director of Planning may issue a written v~aiver from the coastal
development permit requirements of this article for any development that
is "de minimis. A proposed development is de minimis if the Director of
Planning determines, based on a review of an application for a coastal
development permit, that the development involves no potential for any
adv'erse e~ec~, el%her Individually or cumu~at~ve~y, on coastal resource~
and that it will be consistent with all applicable objectives, policies,
and standards of the certified Loca~ Coastal Program. The determination
sh'a'll be made in writing and based upon factual evidence.
(c) De minimis waivers shall be permitted only in the non-appealable area of
the City's coastal development permitting jurisdiction when no local
public hearing is r'equired.
-5~
(d) The Director of Planning will consider the following types of projects for
possible permit waivers:
{1) Proiects which would have been placed on the consent calendar without
special conditions;
(2) Projects fully consistent with the certified Local Coastal Program
(LCP) and for which all applicable policies of the LCP are objective
in nature, such that staff does not have to exercise its judgment as
to satisfaction o~ subjective criteria;
(3) Projects located in areas where similar projects have been approved
as a routine matter without conditions or opposition.
{el The following projects will not be considered for possible waivers:
{1) Projects which involve questions as to conformity with the certified
LCP, or which may result in potential impacts on coastal resources
and public access;
(2) Projects with known opposition or probable public controversy;
.(3) Projects which involve divisions of land including condominiums.
{f) If, upon review of the coastal development permit application, the
Director of Planning determines that the development is de minimis, the
applicant, sha~l post public notice ot the de minimis waiver on the
property for at least seven calendar days prior to the final decision
granting the waiver. Notice of intent to issue a de minimis waiver shall
also be made to the Coastal Commission and to persons known to be
interested in the proposed development in the following manner:
Within ten (10) calendar days of accepting an application for a de minimis
waiver or at least seven (7) calendar days prior to the decision on the
application, the Director of Planning shall provide notice, by first class
mail, of pending waiver of permit requirements. This
notice shall be provided to all persons who have requested to be on the
mailing list for that development project or site or for coastal decisions
within the local jurisdiction, to all property owners and residents within
100 feet of the perimeters of the parcel on which the development is
proposed, and to the Coastal Commission.
{g) The notice shall contain the following information:
(1) A description of the proposed project and location;
(2) A statement that the development is within the coastal zone;
(3) The date of filing of the application and the name of the applicant;
(4) The number assigned to the application;
-6-
(5) The date of the hearing at which the waiver may become effective;
~6) The general procedure concerning the submission of public comments
either in writing or orally 'or
prl to the decision;
.!7) A statement that a public comment period of sufficient time to allow
for the submission of comments by mail will be held prior to the
decision.
The Director of Planning shall report to the City Council at its next
available public meeting those projects for which waivers are proposed,
~ith sufficient description to give notice of the pro osed develo ment to
the C~ty Council. A list of waivers issued by the ~rector of ~lanning
shall be available for public inspection at the ublic counter of the
Community Development Department and at the City ~ounci~ meeting during
which any waivers are reported. A waiver shall not take effect until
after the Planning Director makes his/her report to the C~ty Council. IV
one-third of the City Council (two members) so request, such issuance
shall not be e~fective and, instead, the application for a coastal
development permit shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of
th~s article.
3. Amendment 3: Hearing Officer
[Specific Plan[
- Section 19.92.07-Public Hearing on Appealable Developments
At least one public hearing shall be held on application for an appealable
development, thereby affording any persons the opportunity to appear at the
hearing and inform the City of the nature of his or her ~ concerns
regarding the project. Such hearing shall occur no earlier than seven (7)
calendar days following the mailing of the notice required in Section
19.92.0~6 and shall normally be conducted by the Planning Director or
his/her '~esignee, The public hearing may be conducted in accordance with
local procedures or in any other manner reasonably calculated to give
interested persons, including the applicant, an opportunity to appear and
present their viewpoints, either orally or in writing.
Section 19.92.09.5-Public Hearing on Non-Appealable Developments: Conditional
Uses
At least one public hearing shall be held on each application for a
non-appealable development involvin~ a conditional use, thereby affording any
persons the opportunity to appear at the hearing and inform the City of the
nature of his or her concerns re ardin~ the project. Such hearing shall occur
no earlier than ten (lO) calendar days following the mailing of the notice
required in Section 19.92.06 and shall normally be conducted by the Director
of Community Development or his/her designee. The public hearing may be
conducted in accordance ~ith local procedures or in any other manner
-7-
reasonably calculated to give interested persons, including the applicant, an
opportunity to appear and present their viewpoints, either orally or in~
writing.
4. Land Use: Toxic Wastes
[Specific Plan]
Section 19.al.04-Land Use
Permitted land uses in the $~/~//P/)/a~//~ City's coastal zone shall be
controlled by Map 1, the Land Use Controls Map. Land use designations
include: industrial: general; industrial: business park; residential;
~¢7¢~¢~X//~ commercial: office park; commercial: highway-related;
commercial: marine-related; commercial: specialty retail; commercial: hotel;
landscaped parking; public open space and wetlands.
The specific land uses allowed in each of these designations shall be
determined using the use classifications and definitions and listings found
therein, provided that in the event subsequent data or findings of a
geotechnical, toxic waste, or biological nature on developable areas render
the acceptability of such land uses infeasible, dangerous to public health and
safety, or so environmentally damaging as to nullify the balanced character of
the Bayfront Local Coastal Program ~, such uses shall not be permitted
in those areas. Any application for a coastal development permit for any land
utilized to store such toxic wastes shall include an analysis of liability and
responsibility' for removing such toxic wastes, including an implementable
program therefor.
All land uses shall also adhere to the Performance Standards, Chapter 19.66 of
the City X~ Zoning Ordinance, which is incorporated by reference.
WPC 3843H
-8-
ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 7th day Of February
19 Rq , by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen: McCandlis~. Nader. Moore
NAYES: Councilmen: None
ABSTAIN: ~ilmen: None
ABSENT: Councilmen: Cox, Malcolm
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
ATTEST '
Clek
STATE OF CALfFORNIA )
ZOUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
;ITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chulo Vista, Colifornia,
)O HEREBY CERTIFY thor the obove ond foregoing is 0 full, true end correct copy of
RESOLUTION N0. 13957 ,ond thor the some hos not been oreended or repeoled.
)ATED
City Clerk