HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1978-9219-B
RESOLUTION N0. 9219-8
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY AND TOUPS CORPORATION
FOR THE PREPARATI N FAN ENVIR NME L
IMPACT REPORT
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Policy of the City of Chula
Vista requires that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) be prepared for those
private projects having potentially significant environmental consequences; and,
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the project described in
Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full
could have one or more significant environmental impacts; and,
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator requested proposals
for the preparation of the draft and final EIR from consultants; and,
WHEREAS, the City staff has reviewed the proposals and
determined that the proposal by the above noted contractor was most acceptable; and,
WHEREAS, an agreement between the City of Chula Vista and
TOUPS CORPORATION for the preparation of an Environmental
Impact Report, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though
fully set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said agreement is hereby
approved and that the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $8,850 be
authorized for expenditure from 631-6310-BG44 to be utilize or the purpose herein
and set forth above.
Presented and approved as to form by
George in erg, City Attorney
~?v~~~~ /
ATTEST:
~.
Paul G. Desrochers, Community
Development Director
ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, thlS 3rd day Of August
197 s by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES Councilmen scott, cox, Hyde, Gillow
NAYES: Councilmen None
ABSTAIN: Councilmen None
ABSENT: Councilmen Egdahl
~~ ~~~~
`/~./ ~~
Mayor of the City of Chula Vista
AT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chula Vista, California,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of
,and that the same has not been amended or repealed.
DATED
(seal) City Clerk
_Lc{-~
CC-660
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, AND
TOUPS CORPORATION
FOR THE PREPARATION OF DRAFT AND FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORTS.
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 3rd day of August
lg~g between the City of Chula Vista, hereinafter
referred to as the "City" and Toups Corporation ,
hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor", is understood and agreed
to by all parties as follows:
Tn1HEREAS, the Environmental Review Policy of the City of Chula
Vista requires that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) be prepared
for those private projects having potentially significant environmental
consequences, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the project described in
Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth
in full, could have one or more significant environmental impacts, and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator, hereinafter
referred to as the "Coordinator", requested proposals for the prepa-
ration of the draft and final EIR from consultant(s), and
WHEREAS, the City staff has reviewed the proposal(s) and
determined that the proposal by the above noted Contractor was most
acceptable, and
WHEREAS, the proposal is referred to in this agreement as
Exhibit "B" and is incorporated herein as if set forth in full, and
WHEREAS, the Contractor has signed this agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AND CONTRACTOR AS FOLLOWS:
I. Employment of Contractor
The Contractor is hereby employed by the City to perform
all of the professional services hereinafter defined and described
in connection with the preparation of the draft and final EIR's
on the project herein described. The Contractor does hereby agree
to perform said professional services hereinafter described and
defined for the compensation hereinafter fixed.
f?19-C3
II. Duty of Contractor
The contractor shall, in a good, workmanlike and professional
manner and at his own cost and expense, furnish all of the labor,
technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all
supplies and materials, machinery, equipment, printing, vehicles,
transportation, office space and facilities, calculations, and
all other means whatsoever, except as herein otherwise expressly
specified to be furnished by the City, necessary or proper to
perform and complete the work and provide the services required
by the contractor.
III. Work Required by the City of the Contractor
The contractor shall perform all professional services
described in the proposal attached hereto as Exhibit '°B", in-
cluding any modifications of the proposal agreed to by all
parties and appended to the proposal and incorporated herein by this
reference as if set forth tin full.
The draft and final EIR shall comply completely with the
criteria, standards and procedures of the California Environmental
Quality Act of x.970 (Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq),
the State EIR Guidelines (Calif. Admin. Code Section 15000 et
seq), the Environmental Review Policy of the City of Chula Vista
and the regulations, requirements and procedures of any other
responsible public agency or any agency with jurisdiction by law.
If there are any conflicts between the City of Chula Vista's
requirements and those of another agency, the City of Chula Vista's
shall prevail.
The draft and final EIR shall provide an evaluation of all
feasible mitigation measures which could be carried out to reduce
or eliminate adverse impacts of the proposed project. The docu-
ments shall also analyze all feasible alternatives to the project
as proposed. If there are r-easonable mitigation measures or
alternatives to the project which could reduce the adverse
consequences of .the project but which are .infeasible, the consultant
shall cite the specific economic, social. or other conditions which
render the mitigation measure or alternative infeasible.
The report shall specify which mitigation measures have
been incorporated into the project and which feasible mitigation
measures have not, but which could be incorporated as part of the
project. the report shall also dentifz~ feasible alternatives which could
reduce the adverse impacts but are not being proposed as part of the project.
The Contractor shall consult with aZZ responsible agencies, agencies having
°jurisdiction b~ law and anz~ other person or organization having control
over or interest 2n the project.
The documents shall be prepared in such a manner that they
will be meaningful and useful to decision-makers and to the
public. Technical data should be summarized in the body of the
report and placed in an appendix.
-2-
2 ~~-6
IV. Duty of the City
The City. shall provide to the Contractor all site plans,
grading plans, architectural elevations, project description,
reports or any other documents drawings, etc., which are avail-
able that could be of assistance to the Contractor in preparing
the EIR.
The City shall assist the Contractor in obtaining permis-
sion for the Contractor to enter the subject property, to take
any borings, make any tests, conduct any surveys or reconnaissance
necessary to prepare the EIR.
The City shall provide the Contract with copies of all
pertinent environmental reports, correspondence, or studies which
would be of benefit to the Contractor in preparing the EIR.
The Coordinator will serve as project liaison officer. The
Coordinator may be contacted at the Chula Vista Administration
Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California 92010, or by
telephone at (714) 575-5104.
All public statements and releases to the news media shall
be the sole responsibility of the City. The consultant shall
not publish or release news items, articles or present lectures,
either during the course of the study or after its completion,
except on written concurrence of the City.
V. Compensation Schedule
Payment of the total fee of $8,850 shall be paid
to the Contractor in accordance with the following schedule:
a. 350 of the total fee upon the signing of this
agreement.
b. 35o upon determination by the Environmental Review
Committee that the draft EIR is adequate for dis-
tribution and review,
c. 20o upon certification of the final EIR by the
Planning Commission.
d. loo upon certification of the final EIR by the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista.
The City will not provide financial assistance to the
Contractor beyond the negotiated fee, but will collaborate with
the Co.ntra.ctor and give all reasonable cooperation in the col-
lection-of information.
All applicable costs can be charged to this contract within
the negotiated "not to exceed" price limit. Appropriate charges
may include wages and salaries, overhead, travel, materials, and
subcontract costs.
-3-
2~u-13
VI. Default of Contractor
This agreement may be terminated for default if the
Contractor breaches this agreement or if the Contractor refuses
or fails to pursue the work under this agreement or any phase of
the work. with such diligence as will assure its completion
within the time fixed for completion. Termination of this
agreement because of a default of the Contractor shall not relieve
the Contractor from liability of such default.
VII. Payment Upon Default of Contractor
In the case of termination of this agreement for default
of the Contractor, the Contractor shall be entitled to payment
of the reasonable value of the work and services he performed
after execution of this agreement and prior to its termination,
less the aggregate of all sums previously paid to the Contractor
for work and services performed under the agreement and less any
increase or additional costs of expenses incurred by any damages
suffered by the City by reason of such default.
VIII. City's Riqht to Terminate Payment, Documents
a. Notwithstanding any other section or provision of
this agreement, the City shall have the absolute
right at any time to terminate this agreement or
any work to be performed pursuant to this agreement.
b. In the event of termination of this agreement by the
Ci t y in the absence of default of the Contractor,
the City shall pay the Contractor the reasonable
value of the services actually performed by the
Contractor up to the date of such termination, less
the aggregate of all sums previously paid to the
Contractor for services performed after execution of
this agreement and prior to its termination.
c. The Contractor hereby expressly waives any and all
claims and damage or compensation arising under this
agreement, except as set forth herein, in the event
of such termination.
d. In the event of termination of this agreement, and
upon demand of the Coordinator, the Contractor shall
deliver to the Coordinator, all field notes, surveys,
studies, reports, plans, drawings and all other
materials and documents prepared by the Contractor
in the performance of this agreement, and all such
documents and materials shall be the property of the
City; provided, however, that the Contractor may
retain copies for his own use.
-4-
~_l~l -~
IX. Modifications of Agreement
This agreement may be amended by reason of changes in the
scope of the project as described herein and the amount of any
adjustment (increase or decrease) shall be determined by nego-
tiations to the mutual satisfaction of the Contractor and the
City.
X. Indemnity
The City of Chula Vista, its agents, officers and employees,
shall not be held liable for any claims, liabilities, penalties,
fines or for damage to any goods, properties or effects of any
person whatsoever, nor for personal injuries to or deaths of
them or any of them, whether caused by or resulting from any
acts of omission of the Contractor or his agents, employees or
representatives, not including, liability by reason of acts or
omission caused by the City, its agents or employees, the
Contractor further agrees to indemnify and save free and harmless
the City and its authroized agents, officers, and employees against
any of the foregoing liabilities and any cost and expenses incurred
by the City on account of any claim therefor, including claims
by reason of alleged defects in the EIR; and in the event that a
court of competent jurisdiction should determine that the City has
no authority to provide by agreement for the performance of the
hereinabove set forth professional services, or any of them, the
Contractor nevertheless agrees to assume the foregoing obligations
and liabilities by which it is intended by both parties that the
Contractor agrees to indemnify and to save the City harmless from
all claims arising by reason of the work done by the Contractor.
XI. Limitation of Liability
Any and all liability, claim for damages, cost of defense,
or expenses to be levied against the Contractor will be limited
to a sum not to exceed FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO/CENTS
($50,000.00) or the amount of its fee, whichever is greater, on
account of any injury or damage to persons or property or arising
out of any defect, error, omission, or professional negligence.
Further, the City agrees to notify any contractor or sub-
contractor who may perform work in connection with or making use
of any design, report or study prepared by Contractor of such
limitation of liability and require as a condition precedent to
it performing the work a like limitation of liability on their
part as against the Contractor. In the event the City fails to
obtain a like limitation of liability provision as to injury or
damage to persons or property, design defects, errors, omissions,
or professional negligence, any liability of the Contractor and/
or the City to such Contractor or subcontractor arising out of
-5-
~ Iq-I~,
alleged injury or damage to persons or property, defects,
errors, omissions, or professional negligence shall be allo-
cated between the City and the Contractor in such a manner
that the aggregate liability of the Contractor shall not
exceed FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO/CENTS ($50,000.00) or
the amount of its fee whichever is greater.
XII. Performance Schedule
The EIR will generally be processed in accordance with the
following schedule. It should be noted that during several
phases of processing, extended review of the document may
result in a longer processing time.
a. August 4, 1978. This agreement will be signed and
the contractor shall begin background research and
conduct interviews for the preparation of the pre-
liminary Draft EIR.
b. August 25, 1978. The background research and inter-
views will be complete and preparation of the pre-
liminary Draft EIR will begin.
c. September 15, 1978. The preliminary Draft EIR will
be submitted to the Coordinator for review by City
staff. (Note: This review period may require a
longer period if major modifications of the document
are required.)
d. September 28, 1978. The Draft EIR will be submitted
to the Environmental Review Committee for issuance
as the City's Draft EIR.
e. November 8, 1978. The Planning Commission will hold
a public hearing on the Draft EIR. If no written or
oral comments are received, the EIR may be certified
that night.
f. November 22, 1978. The Final EIR will be presented
to the Planning Commission for certification.
g. December 7, 1978. The Final EIR will be presented
to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency for
certification.
XIII. Discontinuation of 6Jork
This contract will be subject to renegotiation should the
City of Chula Vista order work discontinued for a period longer
than 60 days. All work required by the City in the interim
will be done on a time and materials basis.
-6-
7 ~A-~
XIV. Cost for Extra Services
a. Personnel Costs
The following are per hour salary costs for specific
personnel:
Director of Planning $ 50.00
ESG Coordinator 38.00
Environmental Studies Head 34.00
Noise Specialist 25.00
Traffic Specialist 25.00
Environmental Analyst 21.00
Senior Graphic Artist 34.00
Draftsman 20.00
Senior Landscape Architect/
Project Designer 38.00
Junior Landscape Architect/
Project Designer 24.00
Clerical 15.00
b. Reimbursable Expenses
Direct expenses such as blueprints, reproductions,
xerox copies, etc., will be invoiced at direct cost
plus fifteen percent (15%) for handling.
c. Messenger and Delivery Service
Deliveries made by Toups Corporation will be billed
at $.15 per mile with a minimum of $5.00 per delivery.
Other deliveries will be invoiced as reimbursable
expenses.
-7-
r ~ - Q _ ri
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
. 1
BY ~./~J
Will T. Hyde, Mayor
TOUPS CORPORATION
BY
William Moorhous
-8-
~ IQ-1'~
EXHIBIT "A"
TOWN CENTRE I
FOCUS AREA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Project Description:
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista has established a Redevelopment
Plan for its Town Centre. A master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been pre-
pared for that Redevelopment Plan. The master EIR is included in the Request For
Proposal as attachment "C".
Within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Plan is an area of approximately 16z
acres that has been identified as the Focus Area, A development plan for the Focus
Area has been approved by the Redevelopment Agency. That development plan is depicted
on the attached map. The development plan is divided into four phases, each phase
generally corresponding to a land use.
At this time, the Redevelopment Agency is interested in proceeding with a project
that includes all of the residential portion of the development plan. The residential
portion of the development plan includes all of Phase I and a portion of Phase II.
The supplemental EIR for which your company is requested to submit a proposal is for
the construction of the entire residential portion of the development plan.
Phase Ion the development plan as shown on the attached map consists of the con-
struction of 130 residential units with parking for 260 automobiles. These residen-
tial units will be two,, three, and four-story condominiums. Two underground parking
garages will be constructed with each garage providing 96 spaces. The remaining 68
spaces will be surface-parking contained within the Phase I boundaries. In addition,
there will be approximately 42,000 square feet of landscaping. The average size of
the units is 1,000 square feet with a market price range of between $50,000 and
$80,000. Total estimate cost to construct Phase I, including financing, is $6 million.
The part of Phase II on the attached development plan that is included as part of
this project, is the construction of a six-story structure containing 75 residential
units with an underground parking structure that will accommodate 115 automobiles.
The roof of the parking structure will contain two tennis courts, providing recrea-
tional use for the tenants/owners and enhance the aesthetics of the structure. Total
cost to construct this portion of Phase II is $4.2 million. This brings the total
construction cost of this residential project to $10.2 million.
Pro.7ect Location:
The proposed improvements are planned to be undertaken on a mostly vacant site of
approximately six acres situated within Census Tract 127. Project is bound by
Fourth Avenue on the west and Landis Avenue on the east between Madrona and Center
Streets.
~ ia_t~
:_~XN I B I T „B„
A Proposal:
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Report for the Residential Com-
ponent of the City of Chula Vista
Town Centre ?.edevelopment Plan
the
environmental
studies
group
~~~EiVED
P R C ~- TOUPS CORPORATION JUL 2 8 1978
n A PLANNING RESEARCH CORPORATION COMPANY PLANNING DzPARTMEN 1
Iu CHOLA ~IISTA, CALIFORNIA
IZi~=t~
July 27, 1978
Doug Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Dear Mr. Reid:
On behalf of the Environmental Studies Group at Toups Corporation
(ESG), I am pleased to submit this proposal to prepare the sup-
lemental EIR for the residential component of the Chula Vista
Town Center Redevelopment Plan. We take great pride in our
qualifications and capabilities to perform these services for
you, and look forward to working with you on this interestinR_
project.
The Environmental Studies Group is a truly unique team of urban
planners and environmental stiecialists which are especial)y well
qualified to prepare this supplemental EIR.. With our extensive
experience in local planning agencies in San Piego bounty, we are
conversant with all major environmental and planning issues which
must be addressed in this EIR. This experience will assure an
excellent working relationship and will facilitate coordination
between our staff, your office and the Redevelopment Agency.
Our proposal is organized in the follo~aina format:
Introduction
Scope of Work
Project Personnel
Schedule and Fees
Affirmative Action
The ESG has a diverse, well-rounded team of environmental profes-
sionals and planners particularly appropriate to the requirements
of this project. I will maintain overall coordination on this
project. I have eight years of experience with the City of San
Diego, County of San Diego and the Comprehensive Plannin Organi-
zation including extensive experience with public capital improve-
ment projects. Tom Larkin, head of our EIR section, will super-
vise the technical aspects of report preparation and will present
the supplemental EIR to the Environmental Review Committee, the
Planning Commission and Redevelopment Agency. Mr. Larkin has ex-
tensive experience as a Senior Environmental Planner with the City
of Sar. Diego and has prepared and supervised the preparation of
numerous EIR's on major projects in San Diego. Eva Lerner-Lam
14 _ ~ ~~'C A Planning Research Company
will prepare the traffic analysis for the EIR. ?~1s. Lerner-Lam.
has received her Master's decree in Trans~ortatior, Engineering
from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and has recently
completed traffic and transportation analyses for the IPO at
San Diego County. Nancy Laswell will conduct our noise and air
quality analyses. "~s. Laswell also has extensive experience with
IPO, preparing special air quality and noise studies for County
EIRs and community plans. These specialists will be joined by
Rikke Alberson and Van Rainey of our staff to form a complete
project team which will maximize our effort on this project. I
feel that this diverse experience and background will provide
an excellent opportunity to coordinate with your office and pro-
vide a comprehensive EIR which receives prompt and efficient pro-
cessing.
I speak for the Environmental Studies Group and Toups Corpora-
tion in thanking you for this opportunity to propose on this
exciting and challenging project. I look forward to discussing
this proposal further and working with you in preparing a thor-
ouah, comprehensive supplemental EIR..
Sincerely,
Thomas A. Weber
Coordinator
Environmental Group Studie s
TP.W/ml j
ii
~~...f Q -1'2
1.
I. INTRODUCTION
This proposal by the Environmental Studies Group (ESG) at Toups
Corporation identifies our approach to preparation of a supple-
mental environmental impact report for the residential portion
of the City of Chula Vista Town Centre Redevelopment Plan.
A. Legal Conformance
The preliminary draft environmental impact report, draft report
and final report will comply with all criteria, standards and
procedures of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970
(PRC 21,000 et.seq.) and State_EIR Guidelines (Calif. Admin. Code
Sections 15,000 et. seq.) All documents prepared by the ESG will
conform with the requirements of the City of Chula Vista Envir-
onmental Review Policy and any other applicable regulations,
requirements and procedures of other responsible agencies or
agencies with jurisdiction by law. In any case of conflict, the
requirements of the City of Chula Vista shall prevail. Other
specific requirements and contents of the reports are detailed
in the Scope of Work section of this proposal.
B, General qualifications
Toups Corporation is a nationwide firm specializing in the plan-
ping, engineering and environmental studies for large scale land
development projects and public facilities. The San Diego Regional
Office in La Jolla is one of ten Toups regional offices.
~~ ~q-~
2.
Toups is best known for its innovative approaches to the design
and evaluation of projects which relies upon a multidisciplinary
approach including environmental specialists, land planners,
architects and engineers.
The land planners and environmental specialists at Toups are
part of a semi-independent planrina and environmental studies
unit known. as the Environmental Studies Group. In the western
United States, Enviro~_:nental Studies Croups are located at Toups
regional offices in San Diego, Orange County and Denver, Colorado.
The San Diego Environmental Studies Group specializes in urban
development projects, the Orange office in resource management
and energy studies, and the Denver office in socio-economic
studies.
The San Diego ESG would be the principal staff preparing the
supplemental Environmental Impact Report on this project. The
staff of the San Diego ESQ is exceptionally well qualified as
related in the complete resumes in Section III of this proposal.
C. Organization of Proposal
This proposal is presented in the following sections:
Scope of Services - discussion of the detailed work plan
for preparing the draft and final EIRs.
Schedule and Fees - identification of project schedule
and costs.
Project Personnel - organization of project team and roles
of key individuals on the project. Resumes of team members
are included.
q?1A-1~
3.
Related Experience - similar projects completed by ESG
staff that qualify our firm to prepare supplemental EIR.
Affirmative Action - description of Tou_ps Corp_oration's
equal opportunity employment program.
q7~~-~~
4.
II. SCOPE OF WORK
This section will identify the detailed work program for pre-
paration of the supplemental EIR. The EIR will be completed in
the following faur phases:
Phase One: Background Research and Interviews
Phase Two: Preparation of preliminary draft EIR
• Phase Three: Preparation and Distribution of draft EIR
Phase Four: Finalization of supplemental EIR - Presentation
The reports will be submitted to the Environmental Review Coordi-
nator at the end of Phases Two, Three and Four. Each phase will
build upon the information and draft reports prepared in the pre-
vious phases. On the following pages, the individual tasks of
each phase have been detailed to describe the activities currently
envisioned.
Phase One - Background Research and Interviews
Due to the complexity of this project and the need for close
coordination with all affected parties, Phase One is perhaps
the most important component of the work program. This effort
requires a thorough understanding of all of the existing envir-
onmental, physical, economic and socio-political implications
that may affect the project. A thorough understanding of the
project and its environmental setting is essential to determine
the potential adverse environmental effects associated with de-
velopment of the proposed project.
~7.~~-~Z
6.
All available information will be gathered relating to the
existing physical and environmental factors affecting the re-
development project. The ESG will compile and analyze pertinent
planning documents, special reports and resource studies. The
ESC will also undertake new studies to provide additional infor-
mation needed to complete the environmental analysis.
This background research will serve as the basis for the remain-
'der of the environmental analysis.
Phase Two - Pre aration of Preliminary Draft EIR
Based on the information gathered .and new studies undertaken
in Phase One, the ESG will conduct a thorough assessment of both
short-term and long-term impacts of the project. The diversity
of the ESG staff, including environmental planners, urban planners,
architects andlandscape architects, transportation engineers and
public facilities planners will provide the necessary expertise
to conduct in-depth evaluation of feasible mitigation measures
and alternatives which could reduce or eliminate any adverse
environmental effects which would result from project implemen-
tation. Specialists with our sister firm, PRC-Et2A, will be called
upon to analyze specific economic, social and other factors which
would affect the feasibility of identified mitigations and alter-
natives.
The supplemental EIR will be prepared in accordance with the pre-
liminary outline included in the RFP (Attachment B). The Intro-
duction and Project Description will be based on information
i~ c 9--~
7.
gathered in Phase One. All impact categories will be discussed
in the following format:
Project Setting
Impact
Mitigation
Analysis of Significance
The ESG,currently envisions that the environmental factors will
be analyzed as discussed below:
*Transportation/Access - A comprehensive traffic analysis
will be conducted by ESG staff under the direction of Eva
Lerner-Lam. Existing traffic circulation patterns and
traffic volume will be determined, and detailed traffic
projections will be calculated. The cumulative effects
of the entire Redevelopment Plan and other projects in the
area will. be analyzed. The analysis will calculate average
daily trips, inbound and outbound splits during peak hours
and directional distribution of trips. Detailed diagrams
will be provided to graphically display traffic information
and analysis. The immpact on current and future circulation
systems will be analyzed. The analysis of street capacity
will include ADT as well as peak hour capacity. The current
and future level of service for streets and intersections
will be evaluated. The traffic analysis will identify all
proposed circulation improvements and any other mitigation
measures which could be included in the proposed project.
~'I'he availability of alternate modes of transportation will
be investigated, including mass transit, pedestrian and
bicycle paths, etc.
~~a-~
8.
*Mobile Noise Source - Under the direction of Nancy Laswell,
existing ambient noise levels will be determined using a
sound level meter and will be correlated to existing traffic
levels. Using input from the traffic analysis, future noise
levels will be predicted using state of the art techniques
which will. provide a more thorough analysis than conven-
tionally used Wyle model. Mitigation measures, if any,
will be evaluated for their effectiveness in reducing po-
tential noise impacts.
*Stationary Noise Source - An analysis similar to that de-
scribed above will be utilized to identify potential impacts
and feasible mitigation measures for noise from stationary
sources.
*Soils - Existing information will be utilized to analyze
expansive or unstable soils and effects of earth movement.
*Drainage Pattern - Effects on existing water flows, veloci-
ties and alteration of drainage patterns will be addressed.
*Air Quality - The effects of the project on attainment of
the goals of the Regional Air Ouality Strategy will be
analyzed. Statistics and reports from APCD will be utilized
to determine potential construction effects and long-term
effects due to mobile source emissions.
*Water Quality - The EIR will include a brief analysis of
water consumption and discharge, changes in quality and
quantity of runoff, and potential effects on ground water
resources.
*Historical Resources - The National Register Criteria of
Effect will be utilized to determine potential direct and
'~1Q_n
9.
indirect effects on historic resources .in the vicinity
of the project.
*Land Use s- Current planning documents and statistics will
be analyzed to determine effects of proposed residential
development. Direct and indirect effects of densification
will be analyzed.
*Aesthetics - The effects of revitalization anc? renewal will
be analyzed. Bulk, scale and. compatibility of new struc-
tures with existincx residential and commercial areas will
be evaluai.:ed.
*Community Social Factors - The effect of the project on the
demographics of the project area will be evaluated. Poten-
tial displacement effects and changes in cost of available
housing will be determined.
*Community Tax Structure - The EIR will include a brief
analysis of financing mechanisms and will discuss potential
increases in assessed valuation. Professional economists
are available at PRC - Economics Research Associates, a
sister firm, to assist in any technical .analysis of finan-
cial aspects of the project.
*Schools - Impacts associated with generation of additional
school aged children will be analyzed. School availability
to serve new students and any necessary mitigation measures
will be determined through consultation with the Chula
Vista Elementary and Sweetwater High School Districts.
*Parks, Recreation and Open Space - The EIR will address
the availability of park land within Chula Vista Park
Service District #3. The increased demand for park and
? 14 -R
10.
recreation facilities will be assessed and mitigation
measures will be identified.
*Fire and Police - The EIR will evaluate the availability
of fire and police services and potential effects that
would result from project implementation.
*Watte Disposal - The EIR will analyze the capability of the
Chula Vista Sanitation Service to provide necessary service
to the proposed project.
*LTtilities/Enercry - Water, sewage, gas and electric service
are currently available in the project area. ESG staff
will determine if the proposed project will adversely
affect the capacity of these urban support systems.
Following the analysis of these environmental factors, the pre-
liminary draft EIR will discuss the Unavoidable Adverse Environ-
mental Effects,' Alternatives to the Proposed Project, Relation-
ship between Local Short-Term Use of the Environment and Main-
tenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity, Irreversible
Environmental Changes and Growth Inducing Impacts.
Twelve (12) copies of the preliminary draft EIR will be submitted
to the Redevelopment Agency and the Environmental Review Coordi-
nator for analysis and distribution to necessary City staff. The
ESG will make any necessary changes in the preliminary draft
based on input from the Redevelopment Agency and all affected
City departments.
IZ la1 -L~
Phase Three - Preparation and Distribution of Draft Supplement EIR
Based on input received during Phase Two, the draft supplemental
EIR will be prepared. The Graphics Design Team at ESG will final-
ize all maps and graphic displays for inclusion in the draft EIR..
All graphic reproductions will be 8z" by 11" in size to facilitate
inclusion in the draft EIR. The Environmental Review Coordinator
will be consulted in preparation of the list of organizations and
agencies to be consulted.
When the draft EIR has been prepared to the specifications of
the Redevelopment Agency and the Environmental Review Coordinator,
the ESG will submit 65 bound copies for distribution and public
review.
Tom Larkin, ESG's Environmental Analysis Coordinator will present
the draft EIR to the Environmental Review Committee and to the
Planning Commission at public hearings. Mr. Larkin was chairman
of the Environmental Review Committee in the City of San Diego
before coming to Toups Corporation. He also presented EIR's to
the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of San Diego
in his duties as Senior Environmental Planner in the Environmental
Quality Division.
Phase Four- Finalization of EIR - Presentation
In response to comments received during the public review period,
the ESG will prepare revisions and responses to comments. After
review by the Environmental Review Coordinator, the supplemental
EIR will be finalized and printed. All public comments and re-
71a_R
12.
sponses will be included; 40 copies and reproductible master
will be submitted. Mr. Larkin will also present the final EIR
to the Redevelopment Aaency.
13.
III. PROJECT PERSONNEL
Toups Corporation and its Environmental Studies Group is unique
in the diversity and experience of its staff. The Toups team
combines the full range of planning disciplines including urban
planning, environmental planning, architecture, landscape archi-
tecture, economic feasibility analysis, computer technology,
' public facility planning and transportation engineFring.
This team has been selected over a period of years to develop
a total, integrated planning approach. Professionals have been
drawn from city, county and regional agencies and have extensive
experience working both for and with all levels of public agencies
in the San Diego region. This experience will insure close coor-
dination with the Redevelopment Agency, the Environmental Review
Coordinator and other City staff during preparation of the EIR.
In addition to a wide range of disciplines available in-house,
Toups Corporation is one of 18 separate firms constituting the
Planning Research Corporation (PRC), the world's largest diversi-
fied professional services company. Mutual cooperation and joint
undertakings between Toups and the family of PRC firmsgreatly
expands the capabilities and expertise available under a single
management team.
The San Diego Environmental Studies Group is headed by Tom Weber,
who has eight years experience with the City of San Diego, County
of San Diego and the CPO and was a Senior Planner, Capital Facili-
'~ 14-1~
14.
ties Specialist, with the County's Regional Growth Management
staff. The Environmental Impact Report Section, which will be
responsible for preparing the supplemental EIR, is headed by
Tom Larkin, formerly a Senior Planner and Environmental Special-
ist with the City of San Diego Environmental nuality Division.
Included on his staff are Nancy Laswell, a noise and air pollu-
tion specialist formerly with the County of San Diego IPO, and
Eva Lerner-Lam, a transportation specialist with experience at
both the City of San Diego anc? County of San Diego Planning
Departments.
All of the project team personnel will operate under the control
of a single project manager. In this way, the Redevelopment
Agency is assured of the control and input they desire to keep
the program on schedule and within budget. Specific personnel
are .assigned from each discipline to the project. These profes-
sionals will be individually responsible for the work product,
reporting to the project manager. The organization chart on the
next page indicates how our project team will be utilized on this
project.
~ 14 -~
15.
~,~AVID SOANES, MLA
Architect -
Site Planner
CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPN?ENT
AGENCY
TOM WEBER
Project Manager
TIM GRAVES
Caoital Facilities
NANCY LASWELL
Air Quality,
Noise
TOM LARKIN
Environmental Analysis
Coordinator
ENVIRONMENTAL STAFF
Rikke Alberson
Van Rainey
GRAPHICS STAFF
PRC-TOUPS
EVA LERNER-LAM
Traffic Engineer
~m~Dc~c~~r ~~e~~
1ZIG-R
~ 16.
G3 PRC-TOUPS
THOMAS A. WEBER
COORDINATOR
PROJECT PLANNING
F.niICATTnN
B.A. in Political Science and History
University of California at Berkeley;
Masters in City Planning
San Diego State University;
Three additional years of graduate study
in law, University of California, Hastings
College of Law;
Public Administration and Social Sciences
California State University at Long Beach
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Weber is currently Coordinator of the
Environmental Studies Group at Toups Cor-
poration, La Jolla office. Prior to joining
Toups, he had eight years experience as a
planner for public agencies including the
County of. San Diego, City of San Diego and
the San Diego County Comprehensive Planning
Organization. This experience encompassed
all aspects of public planning including
development review, ordinance preparation,
special studies, environmental and resource
planning, capital facilities planning,
growth management and budgetary programs.
Immediately prior to joining the staff at
Toups-La Jolla, he was a senior staff member
with the County's Regional Growth Management
Program. In that capacity, he was responsi-
ble for developing basic concepts for the
program, coordinating and editing the re-
ports and in conjunction with a civil en-
gineer, evaluating facility needs for future
development.
Additional experience in the public area
included .two years with the Comprehensive
Planning Organization program. Among other
projects,. he designed and co-managed the CPO
Regional Open Space Study, served as staff
planner on the San Diego County Regional
Park Implementation Study and served as staff
planner for open space and recreation on the
CPO Regional Goals Program.
While with the County of San Diego, his work
included assisting in establishing the Envi-
ronmental Impact Report process, preparing the
first County EIR, developing the existing
large scale project review process, preparing
the first specific plan for a large scale
project and preparing reports on planning
department and agency restructuring. He also
managed several interdepartmental studies
including two studies of coastal lagoons and
the implementation of coastal legislation and
guidelines. He served on the task force re-
sponsible for revising the County Zoning
Ordinance. He also served as a special assis-
tant to agency and department heads prepar-
ing budgets and work programs for various
County planning units.
N
,.....
1
PRC-TOUPS
THOMAS LARKIN
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS COOF.DINATOR
EDiJCATION
B.A. - Zoology
University of California, Davis
master's Candidate, Ecology
San Diego State University
Graduate Programs in Urban Planning
and Business Management
University of California Extension
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Larkin has extensive experience in plan-
ning and environmental analysis with govern-
mental agencies and private corporations.
For five years he was an Environmental Ana-
lyst and Senior Planner with the City of San
Diego. During that time, he prepared and
supervised the preparation of Environmental
Impact Reports for major projects throughout
San Diego including the Mission Bay Master
Plan, the Del Mar/Torrey Pines Community
Plan, and large industrial and residential
proposals.
Mr. Larkin coordinated the environmental
review process for the nine million/year
HUD Community Development Block Grant Pro-
gram. He has extensive experience in en-
vironmental review of redevelopment and
17.
rehabilitation programs within the City of
San Diego. Mr. Larkin i.s thoroughly famil-
iar with all aspects of the planning pro-
cess in the City of San Diego and has ex-
perience in all sections dealinel with pro-
ject planning, land development and imple-
mentation of community plans. He was
chairman of public meetings of the Envir-
onmental Review Committee for determination
of significant effect of projects in the
City of San niego and has extensive exper-
ience in presentations before the Planning
Commission and City Council.
Mr. Larkin currently coordinates environ-
mental review for all projects prepared by
Toups Corporation's La Jolla office. He is
project manager for EIR's on residential
proposals throughout San Diego County, and
is directing the environmental study for the
8,000+ dwelling unit Rancho San Diego project.
9
v
a
PRC-TOUPS
NANCY LASWELL
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER
EDUCATION
B.A. - History
University of California
Berkeley, California
N1. A. - Geography
University of California
Berkeley, California
M.A. - Resource Development
University of California
Berkeley, California
Ph.D. Candidate in Geography
University of California
Berkeley, California
EXPERIENCE
Ms. Caswell has extensive experience in the
environmental and planning fields, including
in-depth air quality analyses, noise studies
for small scale and regional projects, envir=
onmental impact report preparation, environ-
mental public policy planning and community
plan analysis.
Her academic training has provided Ms. Cas-
well with professional expertise in urban
planning, resource development and environ-
mental quality. As a research fellow at the
University of California, she conducted studies
in resource location, population distribution
and analysis of transportation systems.
1$.
Ms. Caswell has assumed responsibility at
Toups Corporation for resource assessment,
environmental planning and impact analysis
on several large planning projects. She
is currently project planner for both the
Rams' Hills Project, a 3,000-acre develop-
ment in Borrego Springs and the 2,600-acre
Rancho San Diego Master Plana These pro-
~ects involve in-depth, detailed analysis
of a wide spectrum of technical and plan-
ning issues.
Prior to joining Toups, Ms. Caswell was an
environmental planner for the County of San
Diego. Her major responsibilities included
duties as project manager for County devel-
opment projects, preparation of general plan
elements and. local community plans and en-
vironmental impact analysis. As a special-
ist in noise and air quality, she assessed
air quality impacts of community plans, gen-
eral plan amendments and large scale pro-
jects using tools such as computer simula-
tion modeling and emission projections. She
also helped develop methods for air quality
tactic implementation. She has conducted
small scale and community plan noise studies,
and analyzed adverse noise impacts associated
with airport development and operations.
Through the preparation of several commun-
ity plans and numerous environmental impact
reports, she has gained a thorough knowledge
of development problems in San Diego County.
f''
~ PRC-TOUPS
~b
EVA LERNER-LAM
TRAFFIC ENGINEER
EDUCATION
B,A. - Economics
Princeton University
M.S. - Civil Engineering
Massachusetts Institute
of Technology
EXPERIENCE
Eva Lerner-Lam is currently the chief
transportation planner for Toups Corporation,
La Jolla office. Prior to joining Toups,
she had extensive experience as a transpor-
tation planner for public agencies including
the County of San Diego and the United States
Department of Transportation UMTA program.
This experience has encompassed all aspects
of transportation planning for both regional
and small scale projects. She has planned
highway, transit and multi-modal systems
using a variety of tools including computer
assignment models and multi-variate regression
analysis.
Immediately prior to joining Toups, she was a
transportation planner for the County of fan
y' ~'CC. ?^_ ~~~' C^D~+C.1 Lt, SsIA W~ti T~:= J~_^.~ _'L ~ n
19.
for projecting traffic in community
planning areas, analyzing current
circulation networks and developing
alternative traffic networks.
E. Lerner-Lam has recently completed
work on the circulation elements for
the Poway Community Plan and the San
Dieguito Community Plan. She has a
thorough familiarity with the problems
of regional and local traffic flow
along the I-15 corridor.
On the Lago Dorado project she would
work closely with the office of Alan
Voorhees to complete the critical
traffic :~n:~l.ysis necessary to j~~st:ify
1 ~ .- l ~r
I-i5.
~ 20.
~ PRC-TOUPS
DAVID LEE SOANES
ARCHITECTjSITE PLANNER
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture
University of Miami
Coral Gables, Florida
Master of Landscape
Architecture - Cornell
University,. Ithaca, New York
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Soanes has worked in the fields of
architecture,landscape architecture and
urban and recreational planning since 1968.
His varied educational background and
professional office experience allows
him to combine the understanding of
architecture with that of the natural
ecology to create sensitively built
environments for man's work and leisure.
Mr. Soanes presently coordinates staff
in projects from inception to final
site planning. He has worked on a
wide variety of projects ranging from
single structures to major land plans
for residential, commercial and industrial
communities.
Key experiences include the architectural design
and site planning for a 4,000 acre resort complex
in the southern tip of Florida, including golf/
tennis and hotel facilities with multifamily
townhouse and condominium housing; schematic
design and recreational planning for a new 300
acre park on the Hudson River for Dutchess
County, New York; and the master plan for a 1200
acre town centre in La Grange, New York.
Recently, Mr. Soanes was the architectural design
coordinator on two major projects for the metropoli-
tan Government of Seoul, Korea. Jamsil, a 250
acre new town center is planned to accomodate
20 million square feet of office, hotel and
regional shopping facilities.
A second project was a 1,200 acre regional park for
the City of Seoul which will include a 145 acre
zoological garden, 110 acre theme park and various
ancillary facilities.
Mr. Soanes is also the site designer on an 8000
dwelling unit master planned community for the
Del Web Corporation in San Diego, California.
Mr. Soanes has recently completed the
Master Planning for a 3,000 acre resort
facility in San Diego County which
encompasses self supporting waste water
reclamation and central solar energy
systems.
_-il
.9
I
b
PRC - TOUPS
TIMOTHY J. GRAVES
GRADING, DRAINAGE ENGINEER
EDUCATInN
B.S. - Civil Engineering
San Diego State University
Master of Public Administration
(in progress) - Consortium of
the California State University &
Colleges
Registered Civil Engineer in California
EXPERIENCE
Eleven years of experience in public works
engineering; highway and street design,
hydrologic studies, flood control and
drainage design, surveying, traffic
engineering, capital facilities planning,
sewer systems design, industr~.al waste
control and preparation of governmental
policies and ordinances. _
Mr. Graves joined Toups Corporation
after eleven years of engineering experience
with the County and City of San Diego.
During that period of governmental service,
he was involved in a wide range of public
works projects. He was the project designer
21.
on several major County road projects
and received awards for innovative changes
to the County's hydraulic design proce-
dures for roads. While with the County
Department of Sanitation and Flood Control,
he was responsible for development of 20
year capital facility plans for the 13
County Sanitation Districts.
During his governmental service, Mr. Graves
was appointed to several task forces
which addressed critical regional
issues such as facility capacity and
adequacy, moratoria, water reclamation and
governmental policies. As the capital
facilities specialist on a recent
regional task force, he developed
standards for 10 different public facilities
and services. He has also been appointed
to the Technical Advisory Committee for
San Diego's Regional Water Reclamation Study.
Mr. Graves is currently the Project
Manager of the Morris Cerullo World
Outreach Center project. Responsibilities on
this 200 million dollar project involves
site development, street and highway de-
sign and the design of sewer, water anc~
~.-. ~-.., ,a ,.. -. , .. ..,. ~ .......
-~
1
~fl
TOUPS CORPORATION
RIKKI R. McCLINTOCK-ALBERSON
STAFF BIOLOGIST AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST
EDUCATION AND
REGISTRATION
Bachelor of Arts, Biology
Humboldt State University
Graduate Program in Env:~ronmental
Planning-Ecology Graduate Group
University of California at Davis
EXPERIENCE
Ms. McClintock-Alberson has worked in the
environmental studies field since 1974.
Her previous experience has included
work for the State of California Department
of Water Resources (DWR) and three San
Diego consulting firms before
joining TOUPS. With DWR,-she participated
in programs sampling streambed deposits
and benthic organisms of the Sacramento
River. Additionally, she participated
in the researching and writing of the EIR
for the Fremont Salinity Barrier, and a
Sierra Nevada weather modification project.
This later project, a joint venture
with the Bureau of Land Management
required extensive familiarization
with all aspects of weather modification.
While in San Diego, Ms. Alberson has
been a project manager on numerous
environmental impact reports. Her
special area of expertise is the
ability to assimilate various bodies
of technical and political knowledge
into a comprehensive view of the
physical, social, environmental and
political aspects of each project.
~~
~22 .
23.
TOUPS CORPORATION
VAN RAINEY
ZOOLOGIST AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST
EDUCATION
Bachelor of science
Zoology
San Diego State University
Graduate Program in Progress/
Biology, San Diego State
University
AFFILIATIONS
Mr. Rainey has also worked as an
environmental analyst and consult-
ing biologist while tie was an
intern with the Environmental
Quality Division of the City
of San Diego. While there,
(Save Penasquitos Area for he compiled the baseline environ-
Community and Environment). mental assessments and inventories
for two major new communities,
totalling over 10,000 acres of
EXPERIENCE land. He also completed a study
of vernal pools in the coastal
Mr. Rainey has pursued activities mesas of the northern city area,
as an amateur naturalist for several wherein he sited and mapped the
years prior to becaning a professional extent of these specialized and
biologist and environmental analyst .endangered micro-habitats. He
As a student of San Diego State has also drafted_environmental
University and as a member of the settings and impacts sections
San Diego Field Ornithologists, he for the two community plans.
has participated in studies of
Least Terns and other breeding More recently, Mr. Rainey has been
colonies of birds in the south a project analyst for environmental
San Diego Bay area. He has impact reports and specific
also served as a natural resource plans for complex private residen-
advisor on ad hoc committees for tial developments. The research
two major regional parks being and writing of these reports
proposed in San Diego County. These required considerable coordination
efforts entailed making zoological . with various agency and governmen-
and vegetational community inven- tal personnel.
tories for thousands of acres of
natural terrain and determining
ecological impacts of alternative
park developments.
San Diego Field Ornithologists
San Diego Audubon Society
Ad Hoc Committee Cowle s
Mountain, Fortuna Mountain, Lake
Murray Regional Park
Steering Committee of S.P.A.C.E.
~' 7 i n _R
24.
IV. SCHEDULE AND FEES
If selected to prepare the supplemental EIR,the ESG would nego-
tiate a final schedule of performance and fee structure for the
project. Based on the information now available, the ESG en-
visions a time schedule of approximately 14 weeks. This would
reflect a normal progression from inception to certification of
the final supplemental EIR by the Redevelopment Agency. The
ESG's thorough familiarity with the requirements of CEQA and
the State EIR Guidelines will permit expeditious processing of
the EIR through all phases of the project.
The fee schedule that follows is based upon costs for all work
products outlined in the Scope of Work. It is anticipated that
a payment schedule would be linked to satisfactory completion
of phases of work outlined in the Scope of Work. The contract
price is subject to negotiations and must be ratified by the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista.
qZ~~-~
25.
Time and Fee Schedule
Description Time Fee
Phase I Background Research and
Interviews 3 weeks $1,850.00
Phase II Preprartion of Preliminary
Draft EIR 3 weeks x,800.00
Phase III Preparation and Distribution
of draft EIR (including pre-
. seiztation to ERC and Planning
Commission) 6 weeks* 1,250.00
Phase IV Finalization of supplemental
EIR - Presentation 2 weeks* 950.00
14 weeks $8,850.00
*scheduling dependent upon hearing dates before Planning Commission
and Redevelopment Agency
~2.r9-~~
26.
V. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
Toups Corporation and the Planning Research Corporation (PRC) are
Equal Opportunity Employers. Each local office maintains a cur-
rent and functional Affirmative Action Plan that is available
for inspection at any time. Approximately 60°s of all professional
services performed by PRC and Toups are with government agencies,
and we have always met affirmative action requirements, including
those of the City and County of San Diego.
It is the intent of the Toups-La Jolla Affirmative Action Program
to recognize and meet its social, moral and economic obligations
to all minority groups. There is no discrimination due to race,
color, religion, age, sex or national. origin with respect to em-
ployment or economic opportunity within the firm. Toups-La Jolla
makes conscientious efforts to advertise available positions so
that minority groups and women are fully aware of job opportuni-
ties within the firm.
The Environmental Studies Group has been extremely successful
in providing job opportunities for women. Three of six profes-
sional planners and environmental specialists working directly
on this project will be women. Toups Corporation will comply
with all provisions of the City of Chula Vista Affirmative Action
Program:
~ ~ t a _,~
Modifications to the proposal of Toups Corporation
for the preparation of Draft and Final EIR's on the
Town Centre I Focus Area Residential Development
1. Part II. SCOPE OF-WORK
Phase Two - Preparation of Preliminary Draft EIR
Page 6, second paragraph:
In addition to the elements of the EIR identified as attachmdnt
B to the Request for Proposal, there will also 6e a section
listing those effects which have been found to be insignificant
and have not been discussed in the EIR.
2. Part II. SCOPE OF WDRK
Phase Two - Preparation of Preliminary Draft EIR
Page 9, Aesthetics. Add:
The aesthetic relationship of the proposed project to Memorial
Park which adjoins the project to the south will also be evaluated.
3. Part II. SCOPE OF WORK
Phase Three - Pre aration and Distribution of Draft EIR
Page 11, first paragraph, last sentence, c ange to read:
The Environmental Review Coordinator will be consulted in the
preparation of a list of organizations and agencies which will
receive a copy of the Draft EIR.
4. Part II. SCOPE OF WORK
Phase Three - Preparation and Distribution of Draft EIR
Page 11, add new paragraph four, to read;
In addition to Mr. Larkin, the Environmental Review Coordinator
may identify other project personnel which will be required to
attend meetings of the Environmental Review Committee, Planning
Commission, or City Council/Redevelopment Agency, to make presen-
tation or answer questions. The total additional person hours shall
not exceed four (4) hours.
~2 ~, _ p