HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1979/08/28 Item 10CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMEiVT
Item No. 10
For meeting of 8/28/79
Re solution Accepting Petitions for Street Improvements i n
the 000 Block of Las Flores Drive From "D" Street Northerly to
ITEM T ITLE the City Boundary and Directing the City Engineer to Proceed with
the Formation of an Improvement Act Assessment District and
Prepare the Necessar Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates
SUBMITTED BY City Engineer
ITEM EXPLANATION (4/5TH'S VOTE REQUIRED YES NO x )
As you may recall, on May 1, 1979, a report was accepted by the City
Council regarding the formation of an Improvement Act Assessment District
for "D" Street and Las Flores Drive. At that time, because of two main
factors -- 1) lack of interest in the formation of an Improvement Act
District and 2) the existence of a number of deferrals for public
improvements in the area -- staff recommended
1. That no Assessment District be formed for the construction of public
improvements for Las Flores Drive and "D" Street;
2. Engineering include in its work program for this area the
establishment of a preliminary grad e. This would provide a
continuity in design for those properties wf~ich now have deferrals
("D" Street and Las Flores Drive south of "D" Street).
3. City consider for inclusion in its 1979-80 Capital Improvem ent
Program the construction of a storm drain system and 24' wide ribbon
pavement (where necessary to provide access to properties with
deferrals) in "D" Street and Las Flores Drive south of "D" Street.
If monies are approved, City to establish reimbursement district for
the cost of City participation.
SLH:nr/AY-024
(continued on supplemental page)
EXHIBITS
Agreement Resolution x Ordinance Platx Notification List
Other ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Attached Submitted on
FINANCIAL IMPACT
City policy is to charge cost of preparing plans, specifications, and
estimates to the Assessment District. Therefore, only minor City expenses
are expected unless there is a 50% protest at the protest hearing. If the
district is stopped at the protest hearing, City will need to absorb cost of
preparing plans and specifications. However, this cost may be recouped when
that area eventually does develop.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Accept the petitions and authorize the City Engineer to proceed with the
formation of the Improvement District and to prepare the necessary pans
and cost estimates.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
COUNCIL ACTION
nab
by tb~ City ('ou~~~:il of
C~~ ula ~~i;;~cs, Caifarr:ia
u t .~. CI ~~~ V ^?~
Form A-113 (Rev. 5/77)
Agenda Item No. 10
For Meeting of 8/28/79
Supplemental Page Two
The City did appropriate the sum of $109,000 ($99,000 for construction and
X10,000 for engineering) in the 1979-80 budget for item 3 above.
Since approval of that report, there has been a renevrLd interest on the
part of property owners north of "D" Street for the formation of an
Assessment District.
An Improvement District Petition and Waiver was filed in the Office of the
City Clerk on August 6, 1979, requesting that an Improvement Act
Assessment District be formed far the construction of curb, gutter,
sidewalk, paving, storm drain, water main, underground utilities, street
lights, sever lines, grading, right-of-way acquisition and lot grading in
the 000 block of Las Flores Drive. The petition has been signed by owners
representing 68.22,0 of the area of the proposed district as shown on the
attached plat.
This petition included lot grading, however, this cannot be included in an
Assessment District. Only that grading necessary for° construction of the
public facilities can be done. Some lot grading may be accomplished that
is incidental to the construction of the road.
The petition included construction of sewer facilities. The sewer
construction is currently budgeted in the Capital Improvement Program.
The sewer v~ould allow el imiriation of the Rosebank Pump Station thereby
decreasing maintenance and energy costs.
We considered the alternative of not constructing the sewer now but
constructing it as part of the proposed Assessment District. Advantages
of that proposal are:
1. the construction of the entire project at one time;
2. the Assessment District vrould fund the project rather than the sewer
income fund, thus eliminating the necessity of the City establishing
a Reimbursement District for the sewer ONLY project.
The disadvantages of that alternative are:
1. The project is budgeted now and tV~e el imination of the pump station
now would reduce maintenance and operation costs.
2. The sevrer project will be ready for construction soon. If vie wait
for the Assessment District process (1-1 1/2 years) , inflation would
make the sever project more expensive.
3. Even though we have a petition for the Assessment District, we are
not assured that in fact the district will be a reality. Whether or
not the area is developed the sewer project is still justified.
We believe it more advantageous to build the sev,~r soon, if we can readily
obtain sewer easements. We will then establish a Reimbursement District
for the City to recoup its costs for construction of the sever.
1~~
Agenda Item No. 10
For Meeting of 8/28/79
Supplemental Page Three
Based on this neH~ support for an Assessment District, I recommend that we
proceed with the formation of an Improvem ent District and prepare the
necessary plans and cost estimate.
A transparency is available for Council vie wing.
^ay
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
Resolution No. 9745
Re: Accepting petitions for street improvements
in 000 block of Las Flores Drive from "D" Street
northerly to City Boundary ~, directing City Engin
eer to proceed with formation of improvement Act
Assessment District
I, MARTHA A. ROTH being duly sworn, say that I am a citizen of
the United States, over 18 years of age, a resident of San Diego County and not interested
in the above-mentioned matter.
That I mailed a copy of the attached notice by placing a true copy thereof in the United
States Mail at Chula Vista,. California, postage prepaid, on the 30th day
of August 19 79 addressed to the following persons:
Name
R. Dale Ohlau
Southwestern California Association of
Seventh-day Adventists
Isidoro A. Regalado
Harold West ~ Anne- M. West.
Sue Hudson
Roy ~ Judy Shepard
James Howard
John E $ Leona R Ross
Mary C. Rasmussen
Charles Edward Monschein
Frances G. $ Lester P Petersen
//
Address
45 Second Avenue, CV 92010
6353 Clyde Avenue, SD 92050
84 Minot Avenue, CV 92010
3104 Sun-Up Court, Bonita 92002
54 Antigua Ct., Coronado 92118
366 Theresa Way, CV 9 O11
105 Second Avenue, CV 92010
88 Minot Avenue, CV 92010
94 Minot Ave CV 92010
1121 Merryman Dr., Klamath Fa11s, OR 97601
58 Minot Avenue, CV 92010"
nature
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this ~p~F,~i. day of ,
19 ~_.
Nary PuFilic in and for the County of
S D`i~ego, State of California
~+\~
C \~
-,.~~ . _
;w,,, OFFICIAL SEAL
JANE A. DIEDRICHS
~ ; ~ NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA
~ ,.~ SAN D'EGO COUNTY ~
My comm. expires I~fJ 22, 19$0 !',
276 Fourth 4ve.. Chul^ Vi5r7, CA 9~p10