Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1979/07/10 Item 09CITY OF CHULA VISTA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMEiVT Item No.' 9 For meeting of 7/10/79 ITEM TITLE Resolution 973 Adopting Revised Rating System for Utility Undergrounding Projects and Revised Undergrounding Priority List SUBMITTED BY City Engineer ITEM EXPLANATION (4/5TH'S VOTE REQUIRED YES NO x ) Council first approved a rating system for determining the relative priority of various potential undergrounding projects in November 1972. That system was subsequently modified in June 1977. Engineering staff and the UUAC (Underground Utility Advisory Committee) have in recent months been involved in updating the current priority list. It has become apparent that the rating system is in need of further revision relative to "aesthetic benefit," and to the relationship between the proposed project and previous (or approved) undergrounding projects . Relative to "aesthetic benefit" the now-approved rating system is based on the type of poles and number of cross- arms involved. The reviewers feel that the overall aesthetic benefit should reflect other pertinent factors and not be limited to only the facilities to be undergrounded. Other factors now proposed to be included are signs, street width, setbacks, street trees, etc. (See Exhibit A, Item B- 1) . The current rating system assigns points where the proposed project has a specified relationship to a PREVIOUSLY UNDERGROUNDED segment. The proposed system additionally recognizes APPROVED undergrounding projects (See Exhibit A, Item C) . 5xx:nr/xY-ui~ EXHIBITS (continuea on supplemental pace Agreement Resolution x Ordinance Plat Notification List Other ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Attached Submitted on FINANCIAL IMPACT N.A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt resolution approving revised rating system per Exhibit A and priority list of top 20 conversion projects per Exhibit B. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The concept of the required modifications to the Rating System for the Undergrounding of Utilities have been recommended for adoption by the Utilities Undergroundina Advisorv_~S.omm~ttee. (Rev. 5/77) Agenda Item No. 9 For Meeting of 7/10/79 Supplemental Page Two Exhibit A shows the recommended revised rating system. Exhibit B is a listing by priority number of the top 20 undergrounding conversion projects based on such rating system. The priority list is a summary of point totals obtained through application of the point system and is intended simply as a GUIDELINE for Council use in determining the actual sequence of projects to be undertaken. After adoption of this priority rating system, staff will return with a revised undergrounding program. '~~ ~~ b a r C N X ~ r6 4J r r6 '6 "D ~ o a~ ~ a~ v ~ ' •r O ~ ~ S.• -I-~ RS U ~ > rG O N N N N ~ >> v X i »~ 'p i N RS •r ~ U r ~ +~ U O p o i r o -o ~ o a~ ~ 4- i i 4J •r {-~ N i> i U ~~ -F-~ • U N 4- N N O N C i-~ O N ~ p -O •I-.~ ~ ~ O •r 4J fU Ql O (CS 4J 4J ~ QJ r0 5= ~ r O r Q1 C` O~ Q~ d--~ i N •r +~ N O O O •r N O r~ +~ ro ~ ~ S= C C L i-~ r6 i t C i O v~ Q> > > $= S` RS t6 rt3 N •N i-~ •r S= r6 ~ Q ~ RS r /6 U U U C fCl >> •r ~~~ U ~ L O C~ S` U U r0 f? r U •r r U X U > •r O •r -p O O t~ C rt3 r r6 O O ~ ~O O O O i O •r O Z Z U•r 04- N >N Z ~~•r U O.~ d 3 Z C tT i O N /n s= O •r ~ N ~ N •O N •r >~ i-~ S= •r O Y O •r In 4J }~ pl -N O O O '~ C r6 O •r r O Ql •r N O C N C ~ C O Q i t U i C Q 5= O C~ O ~rY O•r Q•r i i OJ O•r E N O C U U U ~i-~ 'O C U O O 'O i v U fts "fl (O ~ (O 'O R3 i RS RS 5= U •r C1 5= i-~ -+-~ ~ ~ O L~ •r ~ N U r6 4- O C 3 O N cn U i U cn E +~ cn 0 i •r O i i •r O rtS O i i6 •r 1 O rC5 r (n O '~ N •r O +-~ O •N U N O 4- N J N ~ m 4- OJ i +-~ 4--• 4J ~ r0 >- 6l +-> r L5~ -O C ~ N U ~ QJ f2 Q1 F- I~ ~ i N ~ N (O 5= In T= •r (n C }~ O O to i V1 •r C ~-+ 61 Q3 O i-~ •r -1-~ ~ •r cn -N fi3 'p +~ ~ X In N ~ +~ •{-~ +~ U •r J r (n y- O C N -p O C r C O N i i O C cn C •r -p ~ C r >~ • •r •r O i U •r N •r •r i QJ ~ v •r r .~ • 1- F- Cl i~ O t6 O > ~ •r ~ O U ~ O Q1 i -1-~ In ~ O ~ O i ~ ~ cn O c a• 3 n 0 3 a~ sZ s= .n L` i a~ c r c a~ n rts O ~ i •r Q} r i !CS QJ L •r 4- U r L2 i O U' !Z O 5= 0 5= r L^•1 ^ 5= i U S` ~ i-> O O C ~ S_ G7 W O QI- CJl i L3~ rt3 i N N ~ «i •r G7 ~ N •r ~-p Q) i i (n Q •r ~ •r i 0 0 N •r O r •r ~ t Y O r ty • •r UJ N O N D N N d3 •O r N til 0..~ N 3~ -p i-> V1 ~ (/~ C 'd d I C N O N> 5= 0 i In Q~ N L •r •r O (n U N 3 C O O Q Q -I--~ Q O p d •1--~ Q~ a. Q O I r N Z Q In Q O O tl' t/') a ~ W ~ F- Z (l') Q >- C i cn O QJ O F- N 4- N N N +~ ~ W Z U rts cn i O •r rts •r C~ i ~ r-i O O O C r6 r to • 5= X N •r N ~ F- O C O s= ~ 5= 0 Q > i 0 i C L1 S= O Q O S` ~ O i 'a O •r QJ 4J O i N O •r U~ N O C Ql 5= +~ 'p i~ In O -p i U rt5 'O > rL5 'O rO C Q O Q1 •i--~ U •r Q S= ~ 1~ c~ E ~ ..c O O v U rc i L 3 o N O Z O U i U N Vf N O i C 4J O~ i i •r O ~ +~ ~ O i t6 4- ~ r6 r N O O ..C •r O +-~ O +~ U Z O N O ~ O ~ O i ~ t~ 4-- 3 r ~ N 4- [O O Z +-~ rt5 -p 5= Z~ O !Z t71 (~ O N i fn O N O 1 N O •r (n C [n +~ ~ to i (n •r $_ t-~ O O }~ •r -1-~ O to -1-~ ftj '6 +~ •r +~ N U +~ i-> -i--~ U •r !Y ~' -N 4-- C 5=. •r N +~ C r O ~ C O O 5= N S= •r ~ Q C.~3 5= •r >> •r +-~ O ~ •r 4J •r •r O •r i •r~ •r r •}•~ O • d Q' N +~ O ~O O r6 i tT O U P O~ -I-~ O •1-~ O O "n O i 0 ~ W i C a3 f2i U•r QS=~ QO N Qcn i QN 1?r6 O O O i •r O ~ 4J (Cf i 0 >Z r L1 i U Z O O C Ql O O ^ -~ C i U C d7 i S= r C~ 5= Q1 ~ U S? F- 1T i iT O N II1 RS •r CT i -1-~ ~ r6 ~ C~-p Q7 i i •r 4- •r U N N •r N r •r QJ N r d--~ S` • •r N •r O N N O N to S= O r N Q~ N 'C7 fn O O to ~ N 5= ~ ~ N O t/1 O •r•• O N Q. ~ N O 4- N Q1 r (n U N 3 5= O Q Q~ Q U r Q. Q tO Q Q U O Q E D Q~ Q O M N ~ •1-~ S= C U In O ~ •r i •r }-~ •r S= -O N i .~ •i•~ •r r ~ •~-> D7 U T3 •r •1-~ N •r O C •i-~ ~ O •r J i 7 +~ ~ O +-~ N r N U •1-~ lT O C i U C •r C N N O N O r II.•r N i U C O O~ ~ r Z3 • r +~ 3 U d N O O 4J •r S= O r CT ~ U U i-~ oZf O i •r S= f6 }~ ~ •r O N •r ~ U •r •r i O 4- ~ ~ N a--~ i t6 •N U N i-' 4- i +-> Y rC5 N Li V1 O Ll i C N rl3 N C i X to i F- W Q d ~ O O W Q d ~ -.. r~ ,UN~ VpJ~ RESOLUTION NO. (- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AbIENDING RESOLUTION NOS. 6684, 7105, AND 8668, ADOPTING REVISED RATING SYSTEBI FOR UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING PROJECTS AND REVISED UNDERGROUNDING PRIORITY LIST The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, in November of 1972, the City Council, by Reso- lution No. 6684, adopted a si:{-year utilities undergrounding program, later revised by Resolution No. 7105, adopted on the 27th of November, 1973 and Resolution No. 8668, adopted on the 14th of June, 1977, and WHEREAS, the Utilities Undergrounding Advisory Committee has reviewed the proposed revision of the rating system and the revised undergrounding priority list and recommends their adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista that that revised rating system, shown on Exhibit "A", and the listing by priority number of underground- ing projects resulting from said revised system, shown on Exhibit "B", all attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full, be and the same are hereby adopted by the City Council. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt, City Engineer George D. Lindberg, City Attorney ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CIIULA VISTA, CALIFORPIIA, this day of 197 by the following vote, to-wit: , , AYES: Councilmen NAYES: Councilmen ABSENT: Councilmen P4ayor of the City of Chula Vista . ATTEST City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORP7IA) COU.dTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA) I~ City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, DO HERBY CEP.TIFY that the above is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution DIo. and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED M~ City Clerr: I CITY OF CFfULA V i STA COUVCIL AGEiVDA STATEMEiVT Item No. _ For meetinc of 7/10/79 ITEM TITLE Resolution Adopting Revised Rating System for Utility Undergrounding Projects and Revised Undergrounding Priority List ' ~ SUBMITTED BY ~~.~ City Engineer Y ITEM EXPLAiJATION (4/5TH'S VOTE REQUIRED YES_ NO x ) Council first approved a rating system for determining the relative priority of various potential undergrounding projects in November 1972. That system was subsequently modified in June 1977. Engineering staff and the UUAC (Underground Utility Advisory Committee) have .n recent months been involved in updating the current priority list. It has become apparent that the rating system is in need of further revision relative to "aesthetic benefit," and to the relationship between the proposed project and previous (or approved) undergrounding projects. __ Relative to "aesthetic benefit" the now-approved rating system is based on the type of poles and number of cross- ,. arms involved. The reviewers feel that the overall ;,,; aesthetic benefit should reflect other pertinent factors and not be limited to only the facilities to be undergrounded. Other factors now proposed to be included are signs, street width, setbacks, street trees, etc. (See Exhibit A, Item B- 1). The current rating system assigns points where the proposed project has a specified relationship to a PREVIOUSLY UNDERGROUNDED segment. The proposed system additionally recognizes APPROVED undergrounding projects (See Exhibit A, Item C) . ~y._ SKR:nr/3' ^ IBITS (continued on supple^.ental oac~el ~~tN Agreement_ Resolution x Ordinance_ Plat_ Notification List_ Other ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Attached_ Submitted on FINANCIAL IMPACT N.A. STAFF REC0~4MENDATION Adopt resolution approving revised rating system per Exhibit A and priority list of top 20 conversion projects per Exhibit B. BOARD/COt1MISSION RECOMMENDATION The concept of the required modifications to the Rating System for the Undergro wlding of Utilities have been recor~-~ended for adoation by the Utilities Undergrounding Advisory Committee. /~ COUNCIL ACTIO~J Agenda Item Lvo. Fo'r Meeting of 7/10/79 Supplemental Page Two Exhibit A shows the recomrnended revised rating system. Exhibit B is a listing by priority number of the top 20 undergrounding conversion projects based on such rating system . The priority list is a summary of point totals obtained through application of the point system and is intended simply as a G!1IDELINE for Council use in determining the actual sequence of projects to be undertaken. After adoption of this priority rating system, staff will return with a revised underg round ing program. ^.~y i E;~Ii I B IT A Sheet 1 of 3 Sheets RATI^!''~ SYST~'•1 FOR U^IDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES TRANS"•1ISSION AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES PROJECTS A. E;{POSURE 1. Traffic Assign one point for every 2,000 ADT. Use estimated post-construction ADT for projects under construction, or financed and scheduled for construction within two years. MF:XI~~fU~l POINT VALUE - 15 points 2. Entrance to City Assign 5 points for segment approximately one- quarter mile in length and terminating at a freeway interchange (either existing or under construction) . FIXED POINT VALUE 5 points (Total A~-1 plus P.-2 = a maximum of 20 points) B. AESTHr.TIC BENEF IT 1. Assign a maximum of 10 points on the basis of_ the evaluating group's perception of the BEIJEFIT of undergrounding the segment. The points are to be assignod b~ised on a comparative evalu~~r_ion of the characteristics of the segment. Factors to be considered include but are not 1 invited to: a. dumber of Signs b. l~licJt-h of Street c. Nu:;~ber of Pops, height & diameter d. N~.imber of Cross~rms e. NumbE~r of Circuits f. Height <~n~3 Loc:~rtion of E:<isting E3uildinJs (setb~.cks) g. ~haract_cr of ~.djacent prop~rtir's (residential, commercial , etc.) (~ `~ h. Pr~~sr~n:-~ o f Street Trees ~ ^~ " \ i~lAal"•ttl'~1 POIN :' V.~1LU~; - ? 0 points ~ June 20, 1979 (c~ntin~.:c.:i on no::t ~hect) i ' ' ~• PAGE 2 ,• - 2. Parks and Public Buildings - Assign points dependent upon size, aesthetic value, and location of park or public building relative to project area (Note: Normal points for principal park or building frontage, 3 points; side exposure, 1 point) . MAXI~lU~t POINT VALUE - 5 points - • (Total Item B-1 plus Item B-2 -- Maximum 15 points) C. RELATIONSHIP TO APPROVED UNDER~ROUNDING DISTRICT/PREVIOUSLY UNDERGROUNDED FACILITIES 1. Assign S poi:lts to the project if it extends either an approved undergrounding district or a previously undergrounded facility. FIXED POINT VALUE -- 5 points 2. Assign lU points to the project if it is a closing link bettaeen any combination of approved undergrounding district(s) and/or previously undergrounded facilities. FIXEn POINT VALUE - 10 points 3. ]There the proposed project intersects Dither an approved un~~:ergrour.ding district or a previously ~ ~ n ,~~ n r- -1 r- 7 ~ ~ n r7 n i] f a_ ~- 1 i '- ~/ ~ S c '_ ri ?l ~ n "_' n -~ i !-~ t_ t r) F? a ,- h leg (Yih~~th^r to the right or to the left) . MAXIMUM POINT V.AL1JE - 4 points ~S. Assign a m~::cimum of 5 points to the project if there is either an ~~pproved undergrounding di--strict, or pr e•/iously undergrounded facilities c~xi~t along one side of the subject street segr.~ent. h]Aa~']U'~1 P'~I'vT VALUE - 5 points (Total Item C-~l plus It~~rn C -2 plus Item C--3 plus It~rr C-~1 = ~~ m~~xi~nu;~r l~ points) ~h ~~ (continued on next sheet) z . ~ i PAGE? 3 D. AESCCI:'~TED CO?~ISTRUCTICN Assign 15 points to a street segr~~nt scheduled for widening during the current or next fiscal year. FIXED POINT VALUE -- 15 points E. PROPERTY O~1NER FUNDING Assign a na:~imum of 10 points where property owners formally agree to finance a significant share of undergrounding the distribution and/or transmission facilities. MAXI'~1Ur~1 POINT VALUE - 10 points ~y ~~ PREVIOUS REVISED PRIORITY PRIORITY 2 1 9 2 5 3 1 4 3 5 4 6 -- 7 11 8 10 9 7 10 6 11 - 13 12 8 13 -- 14 20 15 17 16 16 17 -- 18 14 19 -- 20 1~'~ /~ EXIIIBlT B ' July` 5, 1979 File No. KY-078 UNDERGROUNDING PRIORITY LIST TOP 20 PROJECTS STREET SEGO IENT Bonita Road Willow/Allen School Road Bonita Road "E" Street/I-805 Third Avenue "K" Street/"L" Street Fourth Avenue "F" Street/"G" Street ruin Street Melrose/Oleander "E" Street Broad:~~ay/Fifth Bonita Road Otay Lakes/Acacia Palomar Street Bay/Industrial Fourth Avenue "D" Street/"E" Street Broadway "E" Street/"E" Street Otay Lakes Road Ridgeview/East "H" Street Fourth Avenue "I" Street/"J" Street Broadway "I" Street/"J" Street "L" Street Fourth/Third Fourth Avenue "K" Street/"L" Street Fourth Avenue "G" Street/"II" Street "E" Street Fourth/Third Otay Lakes Road Bonita/Camino Cerro Grande "L" Street I-5/Broadway Broad~ti~ay "C" Street/"D" Street RATING POINTS 39 31 30 28 27 25 24 21 21 21 20 20 20 19 19 19 19 19 18 18 ._. - _ _. . _ - - -- -- _ 'j j~ - ~> . -_: ~ ~ ;~ ~ v I~ ~ I f~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ = ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~, r~ I ~ I v f j ~ ~ cJ (: l~~' ~ , ~1 1 Q~ n1 ~ ~, j C, V J ;' ' ~ l ~ - I V ~.. .o ~ l~y ? ~ ~ 1~~ ;'~ ~ I~' a u~ I Iv 0 ;, I ! ~ ,11 ~ ~ I ~ _. { ~ 1 l~ l ~ 1 ~. ! ~J I ~f ~ '1 V ~ ~ ~~ I~ n Q ~ ~ _ F'ou ~c-r ~ ~- Avg N ~, ~- _ T I 1 I 1 -1 ~_ I i~ .- I TRoyspAC.~~ 3T.: _G~ sT. C I I?:~o_o ~ 9 I p= 1 ~. 1 0, I c I o-- ~ o I c I o~ I o I~5 13e G ST.~p sT. j I12,3:2:0:~1 l~.101 7. 2101°lol alololl?129 O--SZ', ~ C ST.~ ~~ t3~~~1 ~_,I°- 9=1 o-_~S._Io ~o~_I c7 ~o-l0~,2.1~9 F ~ s`T•~ 6 -- sT: 1 114~7ac~.: 1 7~ I ~. ~ 81 3 i 5- o:: 1 ~ 2 .~ 0 10 _ ~ 3. ~t8 (4 G~ ~T~ ST. _ I I 17~350_ ( 9 to I g I o l0 0:.12- a o. I© 119 Il~o H~ sT. ~-_-- ~""~'. -- -- j I ~ 3~ 370 ~ 1 7 ~ o g I o I o 10 ~ 2 I p p+ p ~7 ~~ _ s'T. ~ .J :ST. I ~ 23, Zyo I I Z l0 18 l o l o I c~ Fol d o I d Zo !12 . J sT. ~ ~ . ~". ~ , 11 ~:, 270 17 1 0 ~ `I l p l o I © I ~ l o l o l d l 14 I~~ si raa er _,,..~ „~.~_ ..r ..~ ~,,,,. ~. , ..---- -- - - !_l' ~~~ j ~ ~ ° I ~ I o j o I o j r1 ~ o ~ o, j o. ~ ~~. +~ -- L ..~.T:~ M~ Ss ~'; -- - 1115'4 t O $ d I _~ - ~~ _. ~I I 8 ~ 1 t l o cti I o I o" 1 a la. (~7-ja.,G I i ~ I ~ ~I gRoa-t~w~.y ~o~ta# A1i~ , I! 4,700 - I Z o S 1 t- I Q I a 12 I ca l o b o (t3 i4: f I I I ~I I- II I I I -_~ -~- I~-~ ~~~.T®~ ~~t ova i I I_ I _ ~ i i. I .. I I I i N sT. 3 ~`~". glop 14 101 l o l d l o l 2 o i ~ i 4 11S ~3~ .D a~'. K ate.-- -_ G~x ~ott~p ~T. r'~-VO MI~-QZ S~"« I -- I 1~~3~0 ' G t S ~'So (4 I ~ o _~? 15~ to I o to j c~ ! G• 1 o I n I o: I o I o ~ o jo X18 I~ ov I C7i l o ~1 ~ }4q _- - --___ _- ~ ~ ~ ~ -- i -1 l I_l ~ .::-i :_::~ -i .. I ~1:: ~ 3`~'°v`'r_''`~!~~°~t:- -~~~-;-1 I _-__ --9,sc~-1s ~~ I 9~ 1 . Q i o-1 a l~ 1 -- ~-1~-~~I~(~ ~~_ ~ ~~ ~'~ ~~ x ~. ~ SHE'~T .i OF 2 S.NEE'TS , l~~ ii-k ! ~ "~ `~ FFO?G;:L:i~ I1:1'I; ;'XS'i~_`? FUit liilDr.k:GF~OLiivD~i?~Ii~ 01~ Ui'ZLI`I'IL~ A. ~?:i'GStiR~ 1. Tr~.ffic - Assign one point for e~Tery 2 , OOC ??T_~T. Use estimated pest-constructio:; r~DT for projects urid~';" constructio;l, or fir.~:nced and sche!daled for conscruct~.on ~•Ii thin t~h~o years. bIi1XIt~Li+i POIiv'T ~,'ALLiE - 15 points 2. L•'ntranc~ to City - Assign 5 points for seci:_~ent approximately one-auar.ter rlilc in length and termir.~.ting at a free~•:ay interchana_ e (either eyisting or under construction). I3. APP~,~~RA~~CE 1. Concentration of E::isti nr Over.he:~d Facilities (F'valuai;e eac'1 sine of street independently). a. Dominant-. Doles ~•ritll 1.oncitudi;;al conductors and cross aims b. 3?ominsnt poles ~ti7ittl to!:gitudinal. conductors; ro crass arms c. Subdomi:~ant poles ~•~~-th longitudinal con- cluc}crs a;lci cross ar;;~s d. Suz~dor.~i_~ant poles with longitudinal con- ductors; no cross arms e. Stun 1~01~ s 2. O".~erhead L.i.ne~ CrGc~'11iC% the St~-cet Assign pointy i~ascd u~.on co.r~^_ ~irati~-e dcn~it.~~ of t.ot~.]_ ovc:rhea;: cur.ot;~ of ~~~ir.es (TC~T?.L IT i•1 ;`~! PLL~ IT::: i ;f 2 - PL'`_1;1i?ir•? 20 points ) 8 pcir.ts 7 }~ai_r, is 6 points 9 points 0-2 noi;it~~ 0-~4 c~oi;~,~.C 3. P:lr};s :lnd Tau'.,]-ic }~u'_l.?in;;s - nssic;li }points de_,cncicnt. uT?or~ si~c~, t~sti~.ctic v~:lu~~, and lc~cat:ion oz: }gar.}: or pu.~lic L;ai lcii.r.~; :-e1:1'~i~~ ^ to n:rojcct: ar^a 0-5 pUJ.il ~:; (~O`i::;. i.orr;.1). r;a::i:,ua; for print;}~<~l sc}:ool frontac}e, . 3 pOi11L. ;; SJ_d~' C!::LUS'_:!"C, 1 pOlJlt) ~~ ~^ -. ~ E:C~-I13! T A . ~ ~ SI~~'E'T 2 OF 2 SNFETs r 4. Previously undergrounded facilities along one side of the street 0-5 points 5. Ornamental street lights - assign credit when code street lights exist in major portion of project area 1 point C. ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION Assign *~ 15 points to a street segment scheduled for widening during the pi¢~~ current fiscal year. Assign ~ 10 points if widening scheduled during the next fiscal year ~~~`~~` }~~?~~ D. PROPERTY OPINER FUNDING Assign a maximum of 10 points where property owners formally agree to finace a significant share of under- grounding the distribution system. 0-10 points * Deleted portions are lined through. Added portions are underlined. WEH:et Revised 6/8/77 ~ ~~