HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1979-9735..(
RESOLUTION NO. 9735
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING RESOLUTION NOS. 6684, 7105,
AND 8668, ADOPTING REVISED RATING SYSTEM FOR
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING PROJECTS AND REVISED
UNDERGROUNDING PRIORITY LIST
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, in November of 1972, the City Council, by Reso-
lution No. 6684, adopted a six-year utilities undergrounding program,
later revised by Resolution No. 7105, adopted on the 27th of November,
1973 and Resolution No. 8668, adopted on the 14th of June, 1977, and
WHEREAS, the Utilities Undergrounding Advisory Committee
has reviewed the proposed revision of the rating system and the
revised undergrounding priority list and recommends their adoption.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista that that revised rating system, shown
on Exhibit "A", and the listing by priority number of underground-
ing projects resulting from said revised system, shown on Exhibit "B",
all attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set
forth in full, be and the same are hereby adopted by the City Council.
Presented by
J n P. Lippitt, City'Engineer
Approved as to form by
~~~
(~
George. Lindberg, City Attorney
ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 23rd day of August 197 9 ,
by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES : Councilmen Scott, Cox, Hyde, McCandliss
NAYES : Councilmen None
ABSENT: Councilmen Cillow
ATTEST
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA)
ss.
K
Mayor of the City of Chula Vista
I~ , City Clerk of the
City of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is
a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. , and that the
same has not been amended or repealed. DATED
City Clerk
i
,>
June 20, 1979
EXHIBIT A
Sheet 1 of 3 Sheets
RATING SYSTEM FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES
TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES PROJECTS
A. EXPOSURE
1. Traffic
Assign one point for every 2,000 ADT. Use
estimated post-construction ADT for projects under
construction, or financed and scheduled for
construction within two years.
MAXIMUM POINT VALUE - 15 points
2. Entrance to City
Assign 5 points for segment approximately one-
quarter mile in length and terminating at a
freeway interchange (either existing or under
construction) .
FIXED POINT VALUE - 5 points
(Total A--1 plus A--2 = a maximum of 20 points)
B. AESTHETIC BENEFIT
1. Assign a maximum of 10 points on the basis of the
evaluating group's perception of the BENEFIT of
undergrounding the segment. The points are to be
assigned based on a comparative evaluation of the
characteristics of the segment. Factors to be
considered include but are not limited to:
9
a, Number of Signs
b. Width of Street
c.. Number of Poles, height & diameter
d. Number of Crossarms
e. Number of Circuits
f. Height and Location of Existing Buildings (setbacks)
g. Character of adjacent properties (residential,
commercial, etc.)
h. Presence of Street Trees
MAXIMUM POINT VALUE - 10 points
\~
(continued on next sheet)
1
~,
PAGE 2 '
2. Parks and Public Buildings
Assign points dependent upon size, aesthetic
value, and location of park or public building
relative to project area (Note: Normal points for
principal park or building frontage, 3 points;
side exposure, 1 point) .
MAXIMUM POINT VALUE - 5 points
C.
(Total Item B-1 plus Item B-2 -- Maximum 15 points)
RELATTONSHIP TO APPROVED UNDERGROUNDING
DISTRICT/PREVIOUSLY UNDERGROUNDED FACILITIES
1. Assign 5 points to the project if it extends
either an approved undergrounding district or a
previously undergrounded facility.
FIXED POINT VALUF. -- 5 points
2. Assign 10 points to the project if it is a closing
link between any combination of approved
undergrounding district(s) and/or previously
undergrounded facilities.
FIXED POINT VALUE - 10 points
3. Where the proposed project intersects either an
approved undergrounding district or a previously
undergrounded facility assinn one point to each
leg (whether to the right or to the left).
MAXIMUM POINT VALIJE - 4 points
~. Assign a maximum of 5 points to the project if
there is either an approved undergrounding
district, or previously undergrounded facilities
exist along one side of the subject street
segment.
MAXI'~UM POINT VALUE - 5 points
,hh
~1
(Total Item C--1 plus Item C--7_ plus Item C-3 plus
Item C-4 = a rnax imurl 17_ points)
(continued on next sheet)
.~
r
r
r
PAGE 3
D. ASSOCIATEn CONSTRUCTION
Assign 15 points to a street segment scheduled for
widening during the current or next fiscal year.
FIXED POINT VALUE -~ 15 points
E. PROPERTY OWNER FUNDIN^v
Assign a maximum of 10 points where property owners
formally agree to finance a significant share of
undergrounding the distribution and/or transmission
facilities.
MAXIMUM POINT VALUE - 10 points
~~~
PREVI US REVISED
PRIOR TY PRIORITY
2 1
9 2
5 3
1 4
3 5
4 6
-- 7
11 g
10 g
7 10
6 11
13 12
8 13
-- 14
20 15
17 16
16 17
-- 18
14 19
-- 20
'y~J
q~
EXHIBIT B,
July` 5, 1979
File No. KY-078
UNDERGROUNDING PRIORITY LIST
TOP 20 PROJECTS
STREET SEGMENT
Bonita Road Willow/Allen School Road
Bonita Road "E" Street/I-805
Third Avenue "K" Street/"L" Street
Fourth Avenue "F" Street/"G" Street
Main Street Melrose/Oleander
"E" Street Broadway/Fifth
Bonita Road Otay Lakes/Acacia
Palomar Street Bay/Industrial
Fourth Avenue "D" Street/"E" Street
Broadway "E" Street/"E" Street
Otay Lakes Road Ridgeview/East "H" Street
Fourth Avenue "I" Street/"J" Street
Broadway "I" Street/"J" Street
"L" Street Fourth/Third
Fourth Avenue "K" Street/"L" Street
Fourth Avenue "G" Street/"F~" Street
"E" Street Fourth/Third
Otay Lakes Road Bonita/Camino Cerro Grande
"L" Street I-5/Broadway
Broadway "C" Street/"D" Street
/~
RATING
POINTS
3g
31
30
28
27
25
24
21
21
21
20
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
18
18