HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1979/05/08 Item 05, 5aCITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMEiVT
Item No. 5,5a
For meeting of 5/8/79
Public hearing - Consideration of amendment to General Plan to change approxi-
mately 11 acres located at the northwest quadrant of "C" Street and Del Mar
ITEM TIT E Avenue ~rom High DensityResidential to Medium Density Residential
Resolution ,S'~~- Adopting GRA-79-5 for approximately 11 acres located at the
northwest quadrant of "C'~ Street and Del Mar Avenue from High Density
Residential to Medium Density Residential
SUBMITTE BY Director of Pla Inin ~/
~ 9 ~-
~: ,
~,
ITEM EXP ANATION (4/5TH'S VIJTE REQUIRED YES NO X )
A. BACKGROUND
1. This item involves a propo ed amendment to the General Plan Diagram, to
change the designation at the nort~iwest quadrant of "C" Street and Del Mar Avenue
f om High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential (see Exhibits A & B).
2. The unincorporated territo~'~ry in question was prezoned R-1, Single Family
R sidential, on October 17, 1978, yin anticipation that this property would soon
b annexed to the City.
B. ANALYSIS
1. Adjacent General Plan designations
North Research and Limited Industrial
South Medium and High Density Residential
East Medium Density Residential
t~Jest High Density (Residential
2. Adjacent zoning and, land use
North - I-L-F Light industrihal and vacant
South - R-1 Single family dwellings and South Bay Pioneers
East - R-2 (County) Single family dwellings
West - R-3-G-D & R-3-L-M-F ',Apartments and mobile home park
D P: 'e (rnntiniiari nn c~~p~,lPment~l~a~o
EXI~IBITS
lr ement Resolution X Ordnance Plat 2 Notification List
th r Res.GPA-79-5 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Attached X Submitted on
FINANCIAL IMPACT
No e
- -_ _ _ __ - -- -I
l- _ _- ---
STAFF RE OMMENDATION
Co cur with Planning Commission Recommendation
BOARD/CO MISSION RECOMMENDATION
On A ril 18, 1979 the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that the City Council
amend th General Plan in accordance with Resolution GPA-79-5,
COUNCIL ACTION
,~
i~(; y ... _. ._ .;
~~}ter" ~~~~.~! .-___.
AGENDA ITEM NO 5,5a
Meeting of 5/8/79
Supplemental page No,
Si
of
si
th
Hi
a
e
VI
3. Last Fall the Commission a d Council based their endorsement of the R-1,
ogle Family, prezoning of the su~ject property on the findings that "the majority
the properties within the proposed annexation boundaries are developed with
igle family homes and new single family construction has occurred recently in
area'.', and that "the R-1 zone ~vill preserve the single family residential
~.racter of the area as well as tie natural slopes on the west side of Del Mar
~nue. "
4. The General Plan is partially founded upon the city-planning principle
~t existing, sound single-f amily'~residential areas should be protected from
tiple-family incursions, and the resultant disruptive and erosive effects
~reof. It is now appropriate, t~erefore, to amend the General Plan Diagram from
Ih Density Residential to Medium'Density Residential, in order to achieve the
~t desireable residential densit,~ for the lands in question.
5. Approval of this General P~~han Amendment would not necessarily preclude
`uture rezoning for some sort of~lclustered housing on the north side of C Street
a of the existing apartment devrrlopment if access can be taken to C Street
:her than to Del Mar Avenue.
~~
P.°.O ~C~ TITLE: C St./2nd Ave, Prezonin.g and Annexation
Project Locaticn: 21 acres of bounty territory north of C St.
between Nort~'Third and Second Ave.
Project Prcponent: City of Clhula Vista Planning Dept.
C::S ~ `d. IS-78-77 D.~TE : Revised August 3 , 1978
A. Project Setting
The proposed project involves approximately 22 acres located
nor h of C Street between Nort~ Third Ave. and Second Ave. The
sub ect property includes 52 separate parcels which are primarily
on elatively large lots develpped with single family homes. Two
par els totaling 2.18 acres ark vacant.
~„_
Ele ations slope from 85 ft. ASL to 25 ft. ASL in the southwest
and in the northwest to 15 ft.'',ASL which is located within the
Swe twater River flood plain. ',(See Exhibit #1)
All vial soils may be present in the area located within the
flo d plain. No major natural',resources are known to exist within
the vicinity, however. Special Report 123, published by the Calif.
Div of Mines and Geology, indicates that an inferred earthquake
fau t may be located in the northwest corner of the project area.
B. 'Project Description
The project entails the prezoning and annexation of a County island
int the City of Chula Vista i~ accordance with the provisions of
the Municipal Organization Act'of 1977 (MORGA) The site is currently
zon d R-2 in the County and, R-3-L and R-1 prezoning is proposed.
(Se Exhibit #2) The prezonim,g would permit the same or lower
den ity than that allowed by the current County zoning.
C. Compatibility with zoning and plans
Pro osed R-1 prezoning is in conformance with residential densities
des gnated by the General Plan's
D-
Identification of en.vironunental effects
.l. Environmental hazards described in Section J of Exhibit
B- Evaluation Sheet will dot effect the proposed action.
5 g5
2.
Growth Inducincr Influences
An exation to the City of Chula Vista would allow the extension
of City Services to the subject property. These services,
co nection to the City sewer system for instance, could
en ourage further developmentof vacant properties involved.
3. Sewer Capacity.
Th proposed annexation will make sewer services available to 52
pa cels and an additional 168'potential units. Additional flows
ge erated will have the potential to further exacerbate existing
ca acity conditions at the Metropolitan Sewage Treatment facility.
Du to the number of dwelling units concerned, however, limited
im act would be experienced.
E. Findings of insisignificant i~hpact
1. The project area has beef subject to urbanization for many
ye rs and since the proposed fictions will not result in any
gr at physical change, and dui to site characteristics, no
na ural resources nor hazards''will be affected.
2. The project is in conformance with the Chula Vista General
Pl n and associated elements end is not anticipated to achieve
sh rt term to the disadvantage of long term environmental goals.
3. Effect on sewer capacity, will be limited and no impacts
wh ch could interact to create a substantial cumulative effect
on the environment are anticipated.
4. The project will not have any effect on traffic or
as ociated emissions nor will'the project result in any
ha and that could prove detri$riental to human beings.
F. Individuals and organizations'',consulted
City of~Chula Vista Planning Dept.
Public Works Diept.
Fire Dept.
County f San Diego - Jeff Harris,~Env. Analysis Div. Comm. Svs. Agency
LAFCO - Bill Davis, Env. Managemen',t Specialist
D currents
1 Special Re_,~ort 123, published by the Calif. Div. of Mines & Geology
2 Fed. Flood Insurance Mays.
Ti'.^ In~~1~_ ~tu~~. apr~lic~.~ion anc e~,~aluatior._=c~r..s docu.TM:;entin~ t::e
~inciinc o~ r.o sicni~ica :- ir,:^~c~ pare at~ac,ed.
'-":VIO'`:~'~i~::T:,L REVIF,~ CJOTDI:...TOR
58
i
r ~
1
I
1
i
. -+ - -
/ /
u _ ,
W
i ~ i ~ ~~ ~ l ~ l l
L i
C ~_~ ~ V
I
i-L-P-F
I
I
~R-3-P 20-F
,~
-~ - ~ -~
i~,r----~---i r ~
~ -' - j~ ~
_-~
~- ~
~' ~ 1 \ ~ 1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - _
Q
I +~ ~.
~~
-- ,
7
RESOLUTION N0. GPA-79-5
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COt`1MISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL AN AP1ENDMENT''TO THE GENERAL PLAN FOR APPROXIMATELY
ELEVEN ACRES LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF "C" STREET
AND DEL MAR AVENUE FRONT HIGH DEI'iS~TI' RESIDE~!TIAL lU MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
q
as
WHEREAS, an area of approximately 11 acres located at the northwest
irant of "C" Street and Del ~~1ar Avenue and designated on the General Plan
high Density Residential was pre7oned R-1, Single Family Residential, on
October 17, 1978, and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission set the time and place for a public
hea ing to consider changing the designation on the General Plan to Medium
Den ity Residential to assure conformity of the General Plan and the prezoning
if he property is annexed to the city, and
WHEREAS, a hearing was held a~ said time and place, namely 7:00 p.m.,
Apr'1 18, 1979, in the Council Chambers before the Planning Commission and said
hea ing was thereafter closed, and
WHEREAS, the Commission found that in accordance with the Negative
Dec aration on IS-78-77 and the findings stated therein, this project will have
no ignificant adverse environmental impact and recertified the Negative Declar-
atibn.
pub
an
11 ,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEp AS FOLLOWS:
1. From facts presented to tC7e Commission, the Commission finds that
is necessity, convenience, general welfare and good planning practice require
mendment to the General Plan to'change the designation of approximately
Gres as shown on the attached E~chibit A from High Density Residential to
Medium Density Residential.
2. The findings of fact in syapport of said determination are as follows:
a. The majority of the properties within the proposed annexation
boundaries are developed with single family homes. The R-1
zone will preserve the single family residential character of the
area as well as the n~tural slopes on the west side of Del Mar
Avenue.
b. The Medium Density Residential designation will achieve the most
desirable residential density for the lands in question.
3. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that said amendment
to the General Plan be adopted.
. That this resolution be transmitted to the City Council.
~~
PAS ED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANPJING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
thi 18th day of April, 1979, by the following vote, to-wit:
AYE Commissioners Pressutti, Stevenson, Williams, R. Johnson, Smith
O'Neill and G. Johnson
NOE PJone
ABS NT: None
ATTEST:
f,? 7
G ~ ~~
Chairman
cretary
c~~85
El~H1~1'~ ~ >~
GPA- 79 - 5 ,
~I
GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT
~~~
NpRTy .
q' soo' iooo'
~~ th
St.
\~\ I-sa
,. :%
:•/
. -~
':. .. •
.... .~.•...• .a:~f'tl'~ t
~~, ~, •~~ .... • • ... • t.
~'.'.. -'....`I
r,..........
`.......
~.-~- ::.
~~.... --
~:
...........
...........
...........
...........
............
-----
~-r.
..I-.~2
. -
~ .....
....
~ ....
.....
•=
.....
{' •... •
~ ... •
......
.......
........
...........
..............
.............
.............
::'....
:.........
...........
;•• .. •
•;~..•.~
• • • . •
•.• •. •.~
.'.... y~
~' •~'~'~ .. • a~
la•.. •
%%/1~ Ai I //i.
...........
+ _ • •
•.~ _ ,~l•..••••••
,,
®=='::z•
_, .
~.r- ~...
fir..
~ :,.
c s •.
i• ~ ... ~"•~ . ... . . ... . . .. w
O
a4
H!
.~- .
=., f" -.
"t 'ffA~'KS~~~i'U$~~
r- - r'- ~~:'.~-
~- '~- c' ;
... _; _ r-
• ..~~ ..4 .... ._' f'
............as..
................
.... .......
• • •ryEOIdIN• • • • . • .
••-DENSFT•K•••••.
... ........
• • f+~ES%DE~IVFh4L.• . .
................
................
................
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • •
............
............
..........
.....
.. ...
...........
...........
...........
,.. w ~ . . • .. •