HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/02/01 Item 2oQ~o~
~oP°
~~\\J~P ORDINANCE NO.
~~GO~~R ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING
THREE MINOR AMENDMENTS TO THE URBAN CORE
SPECIFIC PLAN T0: 1) RECLASSIFY THIRD AVENUE
BETWEEN E AND H STREET FROM A FOUR LANE TO A
TWO LANE DOWNTOWN PROMENADE; 2) MODIFY THE
RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS FOR THE
CORRIDORS DISTRICT; AND 3) ADD OUTDOOR DINING
DESIGN GUIDELINES AS AN APPENDIX TO THE URBAN
CORE SPECIFIC PLAN
Recitals
Project Boundaries
WHEREAS, the Urban Core Specific Plan (UCSP), which is the subject of this
Ordinance, and for the purpose of description is generally located east of I-5, west of Del Mar
Avenue, north of L Street, and south of C Street as shown on Exhibit "A".
Project Description
WHEREAS, the General Plan Update was approved by City Council on December 13,
2005; and
WHEREAS, the 2005 General Plan Vision for the Urban Core of the City states that the
Urban Core will contain the greatest diversity of public, commercial, civic, financial, cultural,
and residential uses emphasizing its role as the hub of the City; and
WHEREAS, the 2005 General Plan Vision for the traditional residential neighborhoods
that surround the Urban Core states that the attractiveness of living in these azeas will be
enhanced by the Urban Core's diversity in character, architectural style, pedestrian-friendly
environment and enhanced access to facilities and services; and
WHEREAS, the Land Use and Transportation Element of the General Plan calls for the
UCSP, or other zoning regulations, to implement the new land uses and vision for the Urban
Core Sub Area identified in the 2005 General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the UCSP was adopted by the City Council on April 26, 2007, (Ordinance
No. 3070}; and
WHEREAS, the UCSP provides pazking standards in the Corridors District for residential
uses at 1.5 pazking spaces per unit plus guest parking at 1 space per 10 dwelling units; and
2-1
Ordinance No. '
Page 2
WHEREAS, on January 12, 2010, in response to a request from Crossroads II, the City
Council directed staff to assess whether the actual demand for residential parking in mixed use
developments is being met in the Corridors District of the UCSP (areas generally south of H
Street on Third Avenue and Broadway, and north of E Street on Broadway); and
WHEREAS, on February 22, 2010, staff conducted an assessment of an existing mixed
use project located on Broadway to determine the parking demand and sufficiency and found that
the parking demand was approximately 1.75 spaces per unit; and
WHEREAS, based on this assessment, staff recommends modifying the pazking
requirements within the Comdors District from the current UCSP standard to the city wide
standazd for residential pazking; and
WHEREAS, the Third Avenue Streetscape Master Planning process commenced in
August 2008, and through the Streetscape master plan process it was recommended that the travel
lanes along the segment of Third Avenue between E and H Street be modified from the current
two to four lane configtuation to a consistent two lane configuration; and
WHEREAS, the new two lane configuration will result in an improved multi-modal
design of this segment of Third Avenue with improved traffic circulation; be pedestrian friendly,
and incorporate a Class III bike lane, and include greater support of the smart growth design
principles envisioned by the 2005 Generai Plan and UCSP; and
WHEREAS, a traffic analysis was conducted that modeled the modifications to the lane
configurations and concluded that the Third Avenue segment would operate at a Level of Service
(LOS) "D" which is established by the 2005 General Plan for Urban Streets; and
WHEREAS, a preliminary Master Streetscape Plan was presented in January and
February 2010 to outreach to community stakeholder groups including the Northwest Civic
Association, Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce, Chula Vista Civic Association, Third Avenue
Village Association (TAVA) Design Committee and Crossroads II, to provide an overview and
to discuss the proposed two-lane configuration and for staff to receive comments; and
WHEREAS, the general input from outreach participants were supportive of the
Streetscape Master Plan and the traffic lane re-configuration; and
WHEREAS, the UCSP provides design standards for development and the Public Realm
within the Third Avenue Village District; and
WHEREAS, a special pedestrian oriented "cafe" envirorunent for the downtown Village
is a stated goal of the UCSP and the outdoor dining design guidelines developed by the Third
Avenue Village Association will provide overall standazds for the use of outdoor dining azeas
along Third Avenue and adjoining streets; and
WHEREAS, by including these guidelines as an appendix to the UCSP, the assurance of
quality outdoors dining azeas will characterize the Third Avenue Village; and
2-2
Ordinance No.
Page 3
WHEREAS, although Chapter XI of the Final UCSP provides a process for malting
Minor Amendments to the UCSP and allows the Director of Development Services to approve
minor amendments administratively; and
WHEREAS, although Chapter XI of the UCSP allows the Director of Development
Services to approve minor amendments administratively, the minor amendments are being
presented to the City Council for their consideration due to the extensive community interest
shown throughout the Streetscape Master Plan process and the public request made by
Crossroads regazding the Corridors District pazking standards; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has determined that the proposed
changes to the UCSP aze minor amendments as they would not introduce a new land use
designation not contemplated in the Specific Plan; would not change the designation of land uses
affecting two acres or more from that shown in the Specific Plan; would not result in changes to
the circulation system or other community facility which would materially affect a planning
concept detailed in the Specific Plan; would not result in changes or additions to the design
guidelines which materially alter the stated intent of the Specific Plan; nor result in new
significant, direct adverse environmental impacts not previously considered in the FEIR-06-01;
and
WHEREAS, a Final Environmental Impact Report (FE1R-06-O1) was prepared and
certified for the UCSP on Apri126, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed Amendment
to the UCSP was evaluated pursuant to FEIR-06-O1 and was found to not result in significant
urtmitigated impacts. The Development Services Director has determined that only minor
technical changes or additions to FEIR-06-O1 aze necessary and that none of the conditions
described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the prepazation of a
subsequent document have occurred. Therefore, the Development Services Director has
prepazed an Addendum to FEIR-06-O1. Additionally, because the proposed project will be
utilizing federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) monies, the Development
Services Director has also reviewed the proposal for compliance with the National
Envirotmental Policy Act (NEPA) as implemented by the U.S: Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) Environmental Guidelines. The Development Services Director has
determined that the project qualifies for a Categorical Exclusion (subject to 58.5) pursuant to
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 24, Section 58.35(a). Thus no further NEPA
environmental review is required.
Planning Commission Record
WHEREAS, a hearing time and place was set by the Planning Commission for
consideration of the Project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least ten days prior to the
hearing; and
2-3
Ordinance No.
Page 4
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on said Project
at the time and place as advertised, namely December 22, 2010 at 6p.m. in the Council
Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, and said hearing was therefore closed; and
WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced on this application before the
Planning Commission at their public hearing held on December 22, 2010, and the minutes and
resolution resulting there from, aze hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding.
City Council Record
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City Council
on January 18, 201 I on the Addendum to the Final EIR-06-O1 for the Urban Core Specific Plan
and Amendments to the Urban Core Specific Plan and to receive the recommendations of the
Planning Commission and to heaz public testimony with regard to the same.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
does hereby fmd and determine as follows:
Section L Environmental Determination
That the proposed project was reviewed for compliance with CEQA and that the
proposed Amendment to the UCSP was evaluated pursuant to FEIR-06-O1 and was found to not
result in significant unmitigated impacts and that only minor technical changes or additions to
FEIR-06-01 are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State
CEQA Guidelines calling for the prepazation of a subsequent document have occurred. The City
Council further finds that because none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State
CEQA Guidelines calling for the prepazation of a subsequent document have occurred an
Addendum to FEIR-06-01 may be and is hereby adopted. The City Council further finds that
because the proposed project will be utilizing federal Community Development Bloclc Grant
(CDBG) monies, the proposed project must also be reviewed for compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as implemented by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) Envirorunental Guidelines and the City Council further finds and
determines that the project qualifies far a Categorical Exclusion (subject to 58.5) pursuant to
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 24, Section 58.35(a) therefore no further NEPA
environmental review is required.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the City Council does hereby find and determine as
follows:
Section II. Findings
Finding 1: Changes have occurred in the community since the approval of the original
UCSP, which warrant approving the proposed amendment.
2-4
Ordinance No.
Page 5
On January 12, 2010, in response to a request from Crossroads II, the City Council
directed staff to assess whether the actual demand for residential pazking in mixed-use
developments is being met in the Corridors District of the UCSP (aeeas generally south of H
Street on Third Avenue and Broadway, and north of E Street on Broadway).
The Third Avenue Streetscape Master Planning process commenced in August 2008, and
through the streetscape master plan process it was recommended that the travel lanes along the
segment of Third Avenue between E and H Street be modified from the current two to four lane
configurations to a consistent two-lane configuration.
Finding 2: The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan for the City of
Chula Vista.
A special pedestrian oriented "cafe" environment for the downtown Village is a stated
goal of the UCSP and the outdoor dining design guidelines developed by the Third Avenue
Village Association will provide overall standazds for the use of outdoor dining aeeas along
Third Avenue and adjoining streets. By including these guidelines as an appendix to the UCSP,
the assurance of quality outdoor dining aeeas will characterize the Third Avenue Village.
The new two-lane configuration will result in an improved multi-modal design of this
segment of Third Avenue with improved traffic circulation; create a more pedestrian friendly
atmosphere, and incorporate a Class III bike lane, and greater support of the smart growth design
principles envisioned by the 2005 General Plan and UCSP.
The general plan vision for the Urban Core is an area containing the greatest diversity of
public, commercial, civic, financial, cultural, and residential uses emphasizing its role as the hub
of the City. The diverse chazacter, azchitectural style and pedestrian-friendly environment, and
easy access to services and facilities will enhance the traditional residential neighborhoods that
surround the Urban Core and is consistent with the vision of the City's General Plan for the
City's urban core azea.
Finding 3: The proposed amendment will result in a benefit to the area within the UCSP.
The new two lane configuration will result in an improved multi-modal design of the
subject segment of Third Avenue with better traffic circulation; create a more pedestrian friendly
atmosphere, and incorporate a Class III bike lane, and better support of the smart growth design
principals envisioned by the 2005 General Plan and UCSP.
A traffic analysis was conducted that modeled the modifications to the lane
configurations and concluded that the subject Third Avenue segment would operate at a Level of
Service (LOS) "D" which is established by the 2005 General Plan for Urban Streets.
The proposed amendments to the pazking requirements affect only the Corridor Districts,
which are areas of the Urban Core that are the furthest away from the center of the Urban Core
and are more auto oriented with less accessibility to transit services.
2-5
Ordinance No.
Page 6
On February 22, 2010, staff conducted an assessment of an existing mixed-use project
located on Broadway to determine the pazking demand and sufficiency and found that the
parking demand was approximately 1.75 spaces per unit and based on this assessment, the
pazlting requirements within the Corridors District shall be modified from the current UCSP
standard to the city wide standazd for residential pazking.
The Streetscape Master Plan further enhances the vision by providing an environment
commensurate with a "pedestrian friendly" and "pedestrian enjoyable" setting. The Third
Avenue Streetscape Master Plan design will change the current two to four lane configuration of
Third Avenue between E Street and H Street to a consistent two-lane downtown promenade. The
two-lane configuration will support the smart growth design principals envisioned by the 2005
General Plan and the UCSP. The change will provide fora "well-balanced" urban environment.
Additionally, these public realm improvements will serve to improve the area's visual quality
and act as an investment catalyst for property upgrades and new developments.
Draft design guidelines for outdoor dining have been prepazed to maintain a quality
appeazance for the "cafe" environment desired for the downtown Village. The guidelines
prescribe the standazds for the selection of street furniture, preferred appurtenances and
furnishings that would be considered acceptable within the Third Avenue Village azea.
Finding 4: The proposed amendment will not result in significant unmitigated impacts
The proposed changes to the UCSP aze minor amendments as they would not introduce a
new land use designation not contemplated in the Specific Plan; would not change the
designation of land uses affecting two acres or more from that shown in the Specific Plan; would
not result in changes to the circulation system or other community facility which would
materially affect a planning concept detailed in the Specific Plan; would not result in changes or
additions to the design guidelines which materially alter the stated intent of the Specific Plan; nor
result in new significant, direct adverse environmental impacts not previously considered in the
FEIR-06-O1.
Finding 5: The proposed amendment will enable the delivery of services and public
facilities to the population within the UCSP azea.
The multi-modal design of this segment of Third Avenue will result in an improved
delivery of services and public facilities to the population; better traffic circulation, create and
pedestrian friendly atmosphere, and the incorporation of a Class III bike lane wil[ support better
smart growth design principals envisioned by the 2005 General Plan and UCSP. Additionally,
the public realm improvements will serve to improve the azea's visual quality thus acting as an
investment catalyst for property upgrades and new developments. The change will provide for a
"well-balanced" urban environment with improved access to public facilities such as roads and
pazks in the project azea.
The Outdoor Dining Guidelines will enable the delivery of services'by maintaining a
quality appearance for the "cafe" environment desired for the downtown Village. The future
population within the Specifc Plan azea will provide restaurant patrons within the Specific Plan
2-6
Ordinance No.
Page 7
area an amenity that has become an increasingly popular feature within the southern California
area and will ensure that restaurants use the public sidewalk for outdoor dining in a way that is
safe for pedestrians and does not present handicap constraints for the visually impaired.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does
hereby adopt an ordinance of the City of Chula Vista approving three minor amendments to the
Urban Core Specific Plan to: 1) reclassify Third Avenue between E and H Street from a four lane
to a two lane downtown promenade; 2) modify the Residential Pazking Standards for the
Corridors District; and 3) add Outdoor Dining Design Guidelines as an Appendix to the Urban
Core Specific Plan all on file in the Development Services Department and City Clerk's Office.
Section III. Effective Date
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and afrer its
second reading.
Presented by
Gary Halbert, P.E., AICP
Assistant City Manager/Director of
Development Services
2-7