HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1986/10/30 Item 04COUNCIL CONFERENCE
AGENDA STATEMENT Item `'
/~ Meeting Date 1030/86
ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION 1`~~~~ Authorizing Submission to the California Coastal
Commission of an Addendum to the LCP/Specific Plan Amendments
Submitted to said Commission in September, 1986
SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Director `'~~`° (4/5ths Vote: Yes No XX )
REVIEWED BY: City Manager
The City's Local Coastal Program/Specific Plan ar~iendment for the ~~idbayfront
was submitted to the California Coastal CommisSio~~ imrnediately after City
Council approval September 18, 1986. The amendment is to be heard by the
Commission November 13, 1986. The Commission's San Diego District Office
staff has completed their review of the submittal and has provided the City
with their comments.
The Council now is requested to approve an addendum to the submitted document
in order to clarify certain items. With such an addendum it is expected that
our amendment will satisfy the concerns of the San Diego staff.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve resolution and authorize submission of the attached
addendum to the Coastal Commission.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable
DISCUSSION:
The addendum attached hereto seeks to clarify several issues brought up in
the review by the District Office staff. Under the Commission's administrative
regulations this addendum may be heard by the City Council and submitted while
the LCP amendment is being considered by the State Commission.
Notices have been sent to all Bayfront property ownerships and interested
parties and organizations. The addendum seeks to clarify the amendment by:
a. Assuring adherence to the original intent of protecting views to
the marshes and bay.
b. Park and open space calculations will show an additional acre.
c. Provisions for consideration of additional visitor serving uses
prior to the construction of any housing.
The landowner and the Planning Department have reviewed the proposed modifica-
tions and are in agreement with the content of the changes. The Planning
Department, however, is desirous of keeping the residential uses and has a
concern if said use is removed.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not Applicable
PD/PB/sc
Form A-113C (11/79)