HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1988-13825 RESOLUTION NO. 13825
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-88-17, FINDING THAT THE
PROPOSED PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CERTIFIED CHULA
VISTA LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM, AND APPROVING COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 043 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MODIFICATIONS
TO ROHR INDUSTRIES BUILDING #99 AT 390 BAY BOULEVARD
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista Local Coastal Program (LCP) has been
certified by the California Coastal Commission; and
WHEREAS, said LCP includes Coastal Development procedures determined
by the Commission to be legally adequate for the issuance of Coastal
Development Permits and the City of Chula Vista has assumed permit authority
of the Chula Vista Coastal Zone; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly noticed and held on October 25,
1988, in accordance with said procedures; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, as "approving
authority" has reviewed and considered the information contained in IS-88-17.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista as follows:
A. The City Council hereby adopts Negative Declaration IS-88-17
attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
B. Based on the following findings, the City Council hereby finds
that the proposed construction of modifications to Rohr Industries
Building #99 at 390 Bay Boulevard, subject to conditions listed
in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein as though
fully set forth, is consistent with the policies of the Chula
Vista Bayfront Local Coastal Program.
Findings
Based on the following findings the proposed project at 390 Bay
Boulevard, subject to conditions listed in Exhibit B, is found
to be consistent with the policies of the Chula Vista Bayfront
Local Coastal Program.
-1-
1. The research and development land use proposed by the
applicant is permitted within the site's industrial
business park land use designation. The total floor area
is within the maximum .5 floor area ratio allowed in the
Local Coastal Program. The proposed research and
development commercial land use is consistent with the
land use standards and requirements set forth in the
certified Chula Vista Bayfront Local Coastal Program.
2. No major grading is proposed. Minor excavation for
footings and foundation will be protected when work is
not being undertaken. This work is not anticipated to
cause downstream siltation and is consistent with the
LCP's areawide grading policies.
3. The project site is not located adjacent to the San Diego
Bay or any other water-oriented resource, therefore, does
not afford the opportunity for public access to any
water-related recreational use and is not inconsistent
with the public access policies of the Coastal Act.
Statewide and regional interpretive guidelines have been
reviewed and the proposed project has been found to be
in conformance with the public access and public
recreational policies of Chapter 3 of the Public Resources
Code.
4. The project provides the expansion of existing industrial
facilities within the area shown as industrial use on
the LCP's Land Use Plan and is consistent with the
industrial development and energy facilities policies
of the Certified LCP.
C. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby authorizes
the issuance of Coastal Development Permit #043 subject to the
conditions listed in Exhibit B.
Presented by Approved as to form by
P&OI~G~' I~q~sr~he?ss~"'~ 't~o~
~TPK6mas J. ar on
Community Development Director Agency A
-2-
ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
Ch , VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 25th doy of October ....
19 88 , by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Council members Malcolm, Co>;, !iade~c
NAYES: Counci 1 members 1lone
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers None
ABSENT: Counci linetubers Moo~:e, I'icCandliss
~Chulo Visto
ATTEST z~y~:~::2/~,,,,CTff, Ci~rf~" "" ..... y
STI OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chulo Visto, Colifornio,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY thor the obove ond foregoing is o full, true ond correct copy of
RESOLUTION N0. 13825 ,ond thor the some hos not been oreended or repeoled
DATED
City Clerk
CC-660
Exhibit B
Rohr Industries Building 99
Coastal Development Permit #043
October 11, 1988
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. During foundation and footing work, all loose soil and backfill material
shall be protected by Visqueen or similar material while work is not being
conducted on-site to avoid siltation downstream.
2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of City Line Departments
pertinent to project approval.
I, Arthur O. Sellgren, authorized representative for Rohr Industries, Linc.,
have read and understand these conditions of approval as required by the City
Council as. they pertain to the construction of modifications to Building #99
and agree that these conditions be incorporated into Coastal Development Permit
~043.
Arthur O. Sellgren
negative declarationEXI!!BIT A,
PROjECT NAME: Construction of Walls to Enclose Service Bay Areas
PROJECT LOCATION: 390 Bay Boulevard
PROjECT APPLICANT: Rohr Industries
CASE Ne: IS-89-17 DATE: September 27, 1988
A. Project Setting
The project site is located at the northwest corner of Bay Boulevard and
"G" Street. It is currently developed with the Detroit Diesel Building.
The project site has been developed for a number of years aria is void of
any natural or manmade cultural resources. This area is within the
Coastal Zone and requires the issuance of a Coastal Permit for development.
There are industrial uses to the north, to the west is the San Diego and
Arizona Eastern Railroad, the SDG&E transmission lines from tile South Bay
Power Plant, and a cogeneration facility. To the south across "G" Street
are existing Rohr facilities, and to the east across Bay Boulevare is
Interstate 5.
Various tests of soils and ground water at the site were conducted in 1986
to determine what, if any, contamination by hazardous materials existed on
the property. The results concluoed that there were only lcw levels of
contamination present. In early 1987 three subsurface storage tanks with
a total capacity of 20,550 gallons were removed under inspection of the
City of Chula Vista Fire Prevention Bureau and the County of San Diego
Hazardous Materials Management Unit. No soil or ground water
contamination was apparent and backfill of the area was permitted.
B. Project Description
Phase I
The project consists of interior improvements to Builoings 99 and lO0.
The addition of a second floor in the middle warehouse and south warehouse
bay providing about 16,000 sq. ft. of additional floor area is proposed.
The use of the building is proposed to be research and development with
associated offices and indoor storage. Approximately 200 employees will
occupy the building. No change is proposed from the existing percentage
of building coverage, paved area coverage, or landscaping. No additional
grading of the site is necessary to implement this project.
"' city of chula vista planning department
environmental review section
Phase II
In addition to the previously reviewed project, it is now proposed ~
expand the research and development use into an area formerly used as a
service bay area. This is considered as part of this overall project.
C. Compatibility with Zoning and Plans
The Chula Vista Bayfront Specific Plan designates the area as Industrial
Business Park. The proposed research and development facility with
associated offices conform to the Specific Plan.
D. Compliance with the Threshold/Standards Policy
1. Fire/EMS
The estimated Fire/EMS response time is three minutes which is within
the seven-minute threshold standard.
2. Police
The Police Department is currently maintaining an acceptable level of
service based on the threshold standard.
3. Traffic
The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal ano hash
concluded that the project will not change the level of service c
roads or intersections serving this property.
4. Parks/Recreation
The threshold standard for Parks and Recreation does not apply to
this project because it is an industrial use.
5. Drainage
Review of the specific development proposals by the City will assure
that storm water flows and volumes will not exceed engineering
standards.
6. Sewer
Review of the specific development propcsals by the City will ensure
that sewage flows and volumes will not exceed City engineering
standards.
7. Water
The Sweetwater Authority was contacted and indicated they could serve
this project.
E. Identification of Environmental Effects
In accordance with the Initial Study for this project, the proposal will
not result in any significant environmental effects.
F. Findings of Insignificant Impact
1. The entire site has been developed for a number of years and is void
of any significant natural of manmade resources that could be
affected by this proposal.
2. The project conforms to the long-range development and protection
plan for the Chula Vista Bayfront and, therefore, will not achieve
any short-term objectives to the disadvantage of these longer-term
goals.
3. This developed project site is within the confines of a larger
industrial area. This minor expansion will, therefore, not have any
cumulative effect which could adversely affect the environment.
4. The project will not result in the emissions of any substances,
noise, vibration, glare, etc. which could adversely impact human
beings. Soils and ground water at the project site have been tested
for hazardous materials and it was found that there were no hazards
on site.
G. Consultation
1. Individuals and Crganizations
City of Chula Vista: Julie Schilling, Assistant Planner
Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer
Ken Larsen, Director of Building and Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Hal Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer
Applicant's Agent: Rohr Industries, Inc.
P. O. Box 878, Mail Zone 29C
Chula Vista, CA 92012-0878
2. Documents
The Chula Vista General Plan
The Chula Vista Municipal Code
EIR-85-1 Bayfront Specific Plan
EIR-86-1 Mid-Bayfront Specific Plan Amendment
EIR-87-3 Acquisition of Property and Demolition of Structures, Bay
Boulevard between "F" Street and "G" Street
IS-88-15 Rohr Ineustries Buildings 99 and 100
This determination, that the project will not have any significant
environmental impact, is based on t~e attached Initial Study, any comments on~.~
the Initial Study and any comments on this Negative Declaration. FurthE
informatien regareing the environmental review of the project is available
from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA
92010.
ENVIReN~T~AL~EVIEW COORDINATOR
EN 6 (Rev. 3/88)
WPC 5551P
city of chuia vista planning department CllyO~c
environmental review section CHUJ,~
:
- APPENDZX A
BF/SPt
City of Chula Vista
Bayfront Specific Plan/Coastal Pemit
APPLICATION
8/16/88
1. Applicant (Owner) Name: ROHR INDUSTRIES, IrIC.
Address P.O. Box 878, Mailzone 29C (Phone) 691-3248
City Chula Vista State 'California Zip92(~12-0878
2. ,Applicant's Agent Name:
Address (Phone)
City State Zip
3. Project Location: 390 Bay Blvd., Chula Vista :
't. Assessors Book/Page/Parcel No. 567-~22-30
5. Project Description: Construct new exterior :yell {I!8'LX20'H) to enc'~ose
service bay area. Upgrade electric service from 500 KVA to 1000 KVA,
includes new feeder and distribution panels within the buildinq.
6. Estimated Cost of Development (Excluding Land Cost):$ 65,000 '
7. Has any application for development on this site been submitted previously
to t~e Ci~ of Chula Vista? Yes . Calif. Coastal Con~ission? ,
or California Coastal Zone ~on Commission?
8. , If 'yes' to No. 7 above, please indicate date and application no.
Application withdrawn project cancelled.
........... Required Processin~ - Office Use ............
/ / Envir. Review Exempt t //Owner Participation #
/ / Envir. Review IS/EIR # / / Local Coastal Pmt CVCP #
/ / Design Review DRC t / / Specific Plan Amend t
/ / Variance t / / General Plan A~end #
/ / Cond., Use Pint CUP # / / Other
Section I. PRESENT USE OF PROPERT~
1. Are there existing structures on the property? Yes
If 'yes", describe, including the number of residential units, or sq. ft.
of floor area if con~nercial, industrial or other use.
1 Building with 38,014 sq. ft. floor space
1 Building with 2,613 sq. ft. floor space
2. Will any existing structures be demolished? No
If 'yes', de~ribe the type of development to be demolished or removed,
including the relocation site, if applicable.
N.A.
· 3. Are there any residents on site? (If so, how many?) 1'41 emplo),ees ,
4. Are there any current employment opportunities on site? (If so, how m~
and what type?) None
5. Describe all structures and land use~ currently existing on adjacent
property~
North industrial open land
South "G" street and Rohr's industrial bldg. 29
East Bay Blvd. and interstate 5
West Railroad, SDG&E property and industrial cogen~ra~inn plant
A-2
Section II. PROPOSED DEVELOPHENT -
1..Complete this section if project is RESIDENTIAL..
a. Type Development: / / Single-family / / Two-family
/'/Multi-family / / Townhouse / / Condominium
b. Type Ownership: / / Owner-Occupied / / Rental
/ / Condominium / / Stock Cooperative~ ~/'Other
c. Number of Structures Proposed , maximum height and
minimum height
d. Total, number of floors in structure __, subterranean floors
lofts' or mezzanines . , at grade or above
e. Number of units: 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms
3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms Total Un~i ts
f. Square footage of floor area(s)
g. Gross density (DU/total acres)
\ h. Net density (DU/total acres minus dedicated land)
i. Number of onsite parking spaces to be provided
j. Number of boat slips to be provided
k. Estimated project population
1. Estimated sale or rental price range
2. Complete this section i f project i s COMMERCIAL or INDUSTRIAL.
a. Type('s) of Land Use Research & development commercial
b. Squ~re footage of floor area 40,627 sq.ft.
c. Number of structures 2 , maximum height 28'
and minimum height '22'
d. Total number of floors in structure 1 , subterranean floors ,
lofts or mezzanines , at gradeor"F'~Bove :. '
exist 2nd floor 8,000 s .ft. office section.
e. Type of construction to Re used....Type V-NR & 1-hou~
f. Describe major access points to the structure(s) and orientation to
adjoining properties and streets "G" street and Ba~ Blvd. with main
Bldg..facing Bay Blvd. "
arkin spaces to be provided 139 existing on site.
g. Number of on-siter;cili~y parking plan.
See attached Rohr
A-3 : . . ,.:i', ·.
I . h. Estimated number of employees per shift 141; number of shifts i ;
Total 141
i. Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate
~ secured 81dq. due to research.
j. Estimated range of service'ar~a and basis of estimate
Not a service based industry.
k. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings parking
1. Hours of operation .7.:OQ a.m. - 5:00
m. Type of exterior lightingexiSting mounted on Bldg.
3. If project is othe~ than residential, con~nercial or industrial complete
this section.
a. Type of project N/A
b. Type of facilities to be provided ·
~. c. Square feet of enclosed structures
d. Total number of floors in'structure , subterranean floorsi ,
~ lofts or mezzanines __, at gradeor'~'~iSove__
e. Height of structure(s) - maximum
f. Ultimate occupancy load of project
g. Number of on-site parking spaces to: be provided
h. Square feet of road and paved surfaces
4. Lot Area (within propertylines) 135,908 sq. ft.
5. If development involves a subdivision or parcel map, indicate number of
lots to be created N/A , maximb~ size r~/A , and minimum
size N/A
6. If land area to be dedicated, indicate acreage and purpose.
N/A
7. Indicate the amount.,of natural open space that is part of the project sq.
ft. or acres) N/A
8. Indicate the amount of landscape area that i s part of this project
(sq. ft.) 18,432 existing..
A-4
g. Lot Coverage Existing : New/Proposed Total
Building 40,627 sq. ft. ~ .sq. ft. 40,62.7 sq. ft.
Paved Area 84,849 0 84,849
Landscape 18,432 . ~ 18,432
Unimproved ~) 0 0
lO. Ar~ utility extensions needec~ to proposed development? a) water
b) gas c) electricity * d) sewer e) telephone
If ye~ c) or e), is extension to be ao"~i~'ground?.
· pgrade electrical service.
ll. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated foundation tvork
(If yes, complete the follo~.ng:)and 120 1.f. of trenching.
a. How much area .(sq. ft. or acres) will be graded?
b. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many cubic yards of earth
will be excavated? 55:
c. What will be the - Maximum depth of cut 3'
:Average depth of cut 1'
.- \ Maximum height of cut slope 0
Maximum depth of fill 0
Average depth of fill
Maximum height o~ fill slope 0
d. How many cubic yards of,fill will be placed?
· e. Location of borrow or disposal site location excavated materials to County
dumpsite.
12. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessaQ to i~lement the
project, and their points of access or proximity to the project site.
Improvements include but not limited to the following: new streets;
street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer lines; cut and fill
slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. N/A
A-5
Section IIl. COAStAL/ENVIRONMENTAL_ INFOPJ4ATION
The relationship of the proposed development to the applicable items be~
must be explained fully. Attach additional sheets if necessary,
1. If the proposed development is to be located between the first inland
continuous public street and San Diego Bay (see map Appendix G), is
public access to and along the shoreline currently available near the
site? No
If 'yes", indicate the location of the nearby access, including th, e
distance fro~ the site of the proposed development. NA
2, Does the development involve diking'," filling, dredging, or placing any
str~ctures in open coastal waters, Sloughs, wetlands, or on agricultural
land designated as farmed o~; grazed wetlands?
(a) diking No (c) dredging
(b) filling No (d) structures
If "yes" to (b) or (c) , indicate the amount of material to be ,dredged or
filled: N/A cu yds
Location of dredged material disposal site r~/A
Has an application been made for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit?
3. Will the development extend onto or adjoin any beach, tidelands, submerged
lands, or public trust lands?
.4. Will the development provide public or private recreational opportunities?
Pin If 'yes-, explain: N/A
5. Will the proposed development convert agricultural land to another use? No
If 'yes", how many acres will be converted? N/A acres
6.Is the proposed development in or near:
a. sensitive environmental areas. rio
b. lO0-year flOodplain No
c. park or recreation area rio
If 'yes" to (a), a biological survey may be required. If 'yes' to (~),
hydrologic mapping may be required.
7. ~Is the proposed development visible from:
a. scenic vista points or designated scenic routes No
b. park, beach, or other public recreation area(s)
c. harbor area No
8. Does the site contain any:
: a. historic resources No
b. archeological resources No
C. paleontological resources No
: If "yes" to any of the above, please explain.! U/A
13. Describe all energ~ consuming devices which are part of the proposed'
._ project and 'the type of energy used ('air conditioning, electrical
' appliance, heating equipment, etc.) New 1000 KVA suh-statinn
14. Will highly flammable or potentially explosive materials or substances be
used or stored within the project site? . ~o
15. If the project could result in the direct emission of any air pollutants,
(hydrocarbons, sul fur, dust, etc.) identify them. No
16.' If the project will result in any emplo)qnent opportunities describe the
nature and type of these Jobs. Research and development
17. How many automobile trips (estimate), per day, w411 be generated by the · project 12 generated by construction.
9. Geolo~ ':
Has a geology study been conducted on the property? No
(If yes, please attach, )
Has a Soils Report on the project site been made? Yes environmental
(If yes, please attach,)
.lO. Hydrology -
Ar~ any of the following features present on or adjacent to. the site? Yes
(If yes, please explain in detail. )
a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water table? No
b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to
the site? Exist, "G" st. curb & gutter.
c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly into or toward a
domestic water supply, la)~e, reservoir or bay?
d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent
areas? No
e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location.
All drainaqe to exist "G" st. improvements.
l!l. Noise
a. Will there be any noise generated from the proposed project site or
from points of access which may impact the surrounding or adjacen~
land uses? r~o
\
12. Biolo~
a. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state? No
b. Indicate type, size and quantity. of tr~es on the site and which (if
any) will be removed by the project. Ngne
A-8
Section IV: NOTICE TO APPLICANTS
Under certain circumstances, additional material may be .required prior to
issuance of a coastal, development permit. For example, where offers of public
access or open space dedication are required pursuant to'the Local Coastal
Program, preliminary title reports, land surveys, legal descriptions,
subordination agreements, and other agreements may be required prior to
issuance of the permit.
Section V: AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE
I hereby authorize to act as my agent or
representative and to bind me in all matters concerning this application.
Signature of applicant(s)
Section VI: CERTIFICATION :
.1. I hereby certify'that I have read this completed application and that, to
the best of ~ knowledge, the information in this application and all
attached appendices and exhibits are complete and correct. I understand
that any willful misstatements or omissions of required information or of
any information subsequently requested by the City of Chula Vista may. be
grounds for denial of the permit application, for suspension or revocation
of a permit issued on the basis of these or subsequent representations, or
for seeking. of such further relief as may be proper for the City of Chula
Vista.
2. I hereby certify that I have read and understand the Standard Conditions
for Approved Permits contained in Section IV.C of the Bayfront Specific
Plan/Coastal Developmen( Application Permit Procedures Manual.
3. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Chula Vista to conduct
site inspections on my property. Unless' arranged otherwise, these site
inspections shall occur between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Signature of Agent
Signature of Applicant(s)
Art Seilgren
WPC 1741~/1748~1
APPENOIX B
CITY O~r CHULA VISTA
DISCLOSURE STATEI4ENT
APPLXCANT'S STATEMENT OF OISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL
APPLICATIONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY
COUNCIL, PLAJ~NING CON~qISSION AND ALL OTHER OFFICIAL BOOIES.
The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the
application.
ROHR INDUSTRIES_
List the names of all persons having any ownership interest in the
property involved.
ROHR INDUSTRIES_ TNC
2. If any .person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corpGration or
--' partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the
shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the.
partnershi p.
\ NONE
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-pr6fit
organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director
of the non-proft t organization or as trUstee or beneficiary or trustor of
the trust,.
NA
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member
of City staff, Boards, Co~mnissions, Cona~ittees and Council within the past
twelve months? Yes No X If yes, please indicate person(s)
Person is defined as: "Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint
venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation,
estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any ~ther county, city and
county, City, municipality, district or other political subdivision, or
any other group or combination acting as a unit.' "
(NOTE.: Attach additional pages as necessary~)
1 n
S' g ature of/ a~pl i cant/date
WPC 07Ol P/174814 ROHR INDUSTRIE$
A-110 : ; Print or type name of applicant
°8-
Case No. /s- 2/~-
CITY DATA
F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. Current Zoning on site: ~~; ~
North n : ,~
South ml ·
East
West
Does the project conform to the current zoning?
2. General Plan land use --,~Ae~l ~l.~Ai~4~--l~l=i~idT',fflmme';i
designation on site:
North
South
East
West
Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram?
Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent
to an area so designated?
Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? /~
r
(If yes, describe the design techniques being used to p otect or enhance
the scenic quality of Chula Vista.)
How many acres of developed parkland are within the Park Service District
of this project as shown in the Parks and Recreation Element of the
General Plan? X~///~
- / -
What is the curre~/~2.,rk acreage requirements in the Park Service
District?
How many acres of parkland are necessary to serve the proposed project?
(2AC/IO00 pop.) _~
Does the project site provide access to or have the potential to provide
access to any mineral resource? (If so, describe in detail.) ~
- 9 -
3.
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following:
Current Current Students Generated
School Attendance Capacity From Project
Elementary
Jr. High
Sr. High
4. Aesthetics
Does the project contain features which could be construed to be at a
variance from nearby features due to bulk, form, texture or color? (If
so, please describe.)
5. Energy Consumption
Provide the estimated consumption by the proposed project of the following
Electricity (per year)
Natural Gas (per year)
Water (per day)
6. Remarks:
Dire(t~r of~anning or Re~resentat~ive
-lO-
Case No.
G. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1. Drainage
a. Is the project site within a flood plain?
b. Will the project be subject to any existing flooding hazards?
c. Will the project create any flooding hazards?
d. What is the location and description of existing on-site
drainage facilities? _~//~-/y/~ ~ ~- ~-~ciL'
e. Are they adequate to serve the project?
g. Are they adequate to serve the' project?
a. What roads provide primary access to the project?
b. What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be
generated by the project (per day)?
c. What is the ADT and estimated level of service before and after
project completion?
Before After
A.D.T.
L.O.S.
d. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project?
If not, explain briefly. ~j
improvement be ma~e to existing e .
If So, Specify the general natu.re of the necessary actions.
- ll -
Case No.
3. Geology
a. Is the project site subject to:
Know. or s,s~ected fa,lt ha,ards? ' :~ ~-~o.~.~ '
Landslide or slippage?
b. Is an engineering .~logy report necessary to evaluate the
project?
4. Soils
a. Are there any anticipated adverse soil conditions~? the project
site? /'jv~_:>~.~' [07 ~,/~ r~ ~,~
/
b. If yes, what are these adverse soil conditions?
c. Is a soils report necessary? y~; ~:~bY ~n :on~uc~ ·
5. Land Form ~d
a. ~at is the average natural slope of the site?
b. What is the maximum natural slope of the site?
6. Noise
Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that
of the applicant? -
- 12 -
Case NO.
7. Air Quality p/~
If there is any direct or indirect automobile usage associated with
this project, complete the following:
Total Vehicle
Trips Emission Grams of
. {per day) Factor Pollution
CO X 118.3 =
Hydrocarbons X 18.3 :
NOx (NO2) X 20.0 :
Particulates X 1.5 :
Sulfur X .78
How much solid and liquid (se~aage) waste will be generated by the
proposed project per day?
Solid / Liquid
h
Are they adequate to serve the proposed project?
. 9. Public Facilities/Resources Impact
If the project could exceed the threshold of having any possible
significant impact on the environment, please identify the public
facilities/resources and/or hazards and describe the adverse impact.
{Include any potential to attain and/or exceed the capacity of any
public street, sewer, culvert, etc. serving the project area.)
Remarks/necessary mitigation measures
C~ty Engj'neer~or 'RepresentatiVe a e ' /
-13-
Case No.
H. FIRE DEPARtlENT
r e e t e
2. Will the Fire Department be able to provide an adequate level of fire
protection for the proposed facility without an increase in equipment
or personnel ?
Ffre ~TaFshal
-13(a)-
Case No. ,.~,-,r,~/? "
H-1. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1. Are existing neighborhood and community parks near the project
adequate to serve the population increase resulting from this
project?
Neighborhood i
Community parks /
2. If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed
as part of the project adequate to serve the population increase?
.eighborhood
Community parks
3. Does this project exceed the Parks and Recreation Thresholds
established by City Council policies?
Parks and Recreation Director or Date
Representative
ROUTING FORM
5 0
DATE: August 24, 1988
Current Plng. Engineering Dept. Building Dept.
Keith Hawkins Shauna Stokes
~l Other
FROM: F~ Environmental Review Coordinator
SUBJECT: FTI Application for Initial Study (DP-563 /FA- 361 /IS-89-17 )
F] Preliminary Draft EIR (DP /FB-__/EIR- )
F'~ Review of a Draft EIR (DP /FB-__/EIR- )
[='] Review of Environmental Review Record ( FC-__/ERR- )
The project consists of: Construct new exterior wall (148'L X 20'H) to
enclose service bay area.
Location: 390 Bay Blvd.
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by 8/31/88
Please submit all time incurred for this document below:
Date Person /TJ~)~[C Time
EN 4 (Rev. 12/82) /_T~22 S
Sweetwater Union High School District
ADM[[~$TRA'f'~ON CENTER
1130 FIFTH AVENUE
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92OII
(619) 691-5553
September 15. I988 SEP .1. 6 2',988
Mr. Douglas D. Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 92010
Dear Mr. Reid:
Re: IS-89-17 Location: 390 Bay Blvd.
Description: Constroct new exterior wall to
enclose service bay area·
Request: Rohr Industries. Inc.
The above project will not have an significant impact on the
Sweetwater Union High School District. However if any
additional square footage is added payment of school fees
will be required pursuant to Government Code 53311 (Community
Facilities District Mello-Roos) or 65995 (Developer Fees).
whichever is most applicable, prior to issuance of building
permit.
· ,. / ,~,~,/. ,
Thomas Si!va
Director of Planning
TSsly