HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1978/12/19 Item 06, 06aCITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No. 6, 6a
For meeting of 12/19/78
Public hearing - Consideration of precise plan to create four single family
ITEM TITLE lots at 21 Quintard in the R-1-5=P zone - Robert Eldred
Resolution 9414- Approving precise plan for division of property at
21 Quintard into four lots
SUBMITTED BY Director of Planning ~
Jy ~i/~. /
ITEM EXPLANATION (4/5TH'S VOTE REQUIRED YES NOX )
A. BACKGROUND
1. The item involves an application for a precise plan to divide a
39,600 sq. ft. parcel into 4 lots located at 21 Quintard Street in the R-1-5-P
zone. Three of the lots will be served by a 20 foot wide access driveway.
2. On November 22, 1978 the Planning Commission adopted the Negative
Declaration on IS-79-28 which is herewith forwarded to council.
B. DISCUSSION
1. Adjacent zoning and land use.
North - R-1 Single family dwellings
South - R-3-T Single family attached dwellings
East - R-1-5 Single family dwellings
West - R-1-5 Vacant (approved single familysubdivision)
2. Existing site characteristics
The project site is a 132' x 300' parcel developed with two single
family detached dwellings located approximately 48' from the front property
line. The remaining area to the rear of the homes is vacant. The site slopes
gently from east to west with an average natural slope of approximately 5%.
The site represents the only remaining unsubdivided area along Quintard between
Hilltop and Tobias.
KGL:mr
rvi ~ ~n°nT~nued on supplemental page )
~~nil3ii~
Agreement Resolution X Ordinance Plat X Notification List
Res .'PL'M- 79-14
Other Precise Plan ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Attached X Submitted on
FINANCIAL IMPACT
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Concur with Planning Commission recommendation
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On November 22, 1978 the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that the City
Council approve the precise plan for four single family lots at 21 Quintard Street in
accordance with Resolution PCM-79-14.
a-m,~
COUNCIL ACTION
.
~ ; _, ~ ~:
~~ 9 `
9C~/~/ ~`.~ ~~.- -~-W- M_.___ j,__a f F o rm A-113 ( Rev . 5!77 )
AGENDA ITEM No.6 6a
Meeting of 12/19/18
Supplemental page No. 2
3. Proposed development
The applicant proposes to divide the property into four lots, three of
which are proposed to be served by a 20 foot wide driveway along the easterly
property line. The lot adjacent to the street will have a lot depth of 150 feet
and a lot area of 16,800 sq. ft. The remaining area will be divided into three
50 foot wide lots with a lot depth of 112 feet. The lot area of each lot exclusive
of the access driveway and guest parking areas, is a minimum of 5400 sq. ft. Five
guest parking spaces are proposed for the three lots. The guest parking ratio
is 1.67 spaces per unit. Two of the spaces are located at the extreme north end
of the driveway and the other three are parallel spaces. One space is located
in front of lot 2, one in front of lot 3 and the other at the northeast corner
of lot 4. There is a common driveway between lots 1 and 2 which also functions
as a turn around. The homes proposed on the new lots will be similar to the
models used in Sheperdville Units 1 and 2 which are designed to fit on a 5000
sq. ft. lot.
4. Precise plan guidelines
The precise plan guidelines for the R-1-5-P zone in this area stipulate
that a subdivision map be required for the development of any given area and
that compensating open space will not be required. In addition a 15 foot front
yard setback was established for all adjoining streets. The proposed development
complies with the adopted guidelines.
5. Proposed panhandle lot split ordinance
The staff has recently completed the first draft of a proposed amendment
to the Code establishing development regulations and criteria governing panhandle
lots. If adopted the amendment would eliminate the necessity of filing for a
variance to create lots without street frontage. Since the subject property is
subject to the "P" Precise Plan modifying district a variance is not required
for the proposed project which can be approved through the precise plan
procedure. The applicant was informed of the proposed amendment and has
designed the project in accordance with the anticipated development standards.
C. ANALYSIS
1. The proposed development is very similar to the approved Shepherdville
Subdivisions Units 1 and 2 to be constructed at the northeast and northwest
corners of Tobias Drive and Quintard Street. Similar house designs will be
used and the developer has informed the staff that the same CC&R's will be used.
The proposed development is therefore consistent with the adjacent development.
2. The proposed development meets the proposed regulations governing
panhandle lots and while these regulations are still in the draft stage, they
do reflect what has typically been required for similar developments processed
under the variance procedure.
~~ `~ / `~