Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1980-9913 ; . Form No. 344 Rev. 2-79 RESOLUTION NO. 9913 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT 80-6, SANTA ANGELA CONDOMINIUMS The City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds as follows: That in accordance with the attached Negative Declara- tion, IS-79-55 , and the findings therein, the proposed tentative map will not have a significant impact upon the environment, and the City Council hereby certifies that the Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista has heretofore approved that certain tentative map of a subdivision to be known as Chula Vista Tract 80-6, Santa Angela Condominiums and has recommended that the City Council approve said tentative map subject to the conditions contained in Planning commission Resolution No. PCA-80-6 , adopted on the 28th day of November 1979, a copy of which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof the same as though fully set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve said tentative sub- division map in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. PCA-80-6 Presented by Approved as to form by D 4 ~~~~A D. J. Peterson, Director of Planning - ~ '--.... George D'. Lindberg, Ci tll,"Attorney ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the CITY COUNCIL CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 8th day of January by the fOllowing vote, to-wit: of the CITY OF , 19~, AYES: Councilmen Cox, Hyde, McCandliss, Scott, Gillow NAYES: Councilmen None ABSENT: Councilmen None CJ~ "1M Mayor of the City of Chula Vista STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA I, , City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. , and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED City Clerk