Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1982/12/21 Item 14~. COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~ -~ ' Item 14 Meeting Date 12/x/82 • ~ ITEM TITL Ordinance ~ ~ f ~jj - Establishing a Commission on Aging SECO-r"D `~C1NG ~i~ID tiDCPTiJiJ SUBMITTED BY•Assistant City M~nage~ On Septemb Senior Aff directed t ordinance Mayor's Ad contains m or minor r changes an REC BOARDS/CO ordinance DISCUSSION (4/5ths Vote: Yes No x ) r 21, 1982, the City Council accepted a report from the Mayor's Ad Hoc Committee on firs recommending that a Commission on Aging be established. The City Council at an appropriate ordinance be drafted creating such a commission. A proposed as prepared by the City Attorney's Office, which was subsequently referred to the Hoc Committee for their review and suggested changes. The ordinance before you difications suggested by the Ad Hoc Committee. Those changes constituting additions visions as prepared', by the City Attorney are underlined. We have reviewed those do not find them objectionable. It is therefore my ION: That the City Council place the ordinance on first reading. SSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor's Ad Hoc Committee has reviewed the proposed d it contains the additions and/or alterations suggested by that committee. Creation o a Commission on Aging has been a long-sought goal of our senior population. It has b~their feeling for many years that the needs of our senior population could be more a ately addressed if such a commission was established. The ordina ce proposed is typical of those established in other jurisdictions with some minor exceptions The commission as proposed, under Section 2.37.030, would have as one its primary ob ectives to undertake investigations and studies for the purpose of making recommenda- tions to t e City Council concerning social service and/or human service programs and facilities I believe this objective is appropriate because social and human service problems seniors fa e as a group are significant and should be adequately addressed. The proposed ordinance ncludes a two-year Sunset provision, as found in Section 2.37.070, as suggested by the Cit Council. We had originally proposed an eighteen-month sunset provision but I believe th Ad Hoc Committee's 'rationale for extending this period to two years is logical and should be accepted. I have som concern over what appears to be duplicated duties, functions and objectives of this commi Sion as they relate to the charges currently placed on other existing commissions. I believe he new language proposed by the Mayor's Ad Hoc Committee under Section 2.37.020, Subsection B, recognizes the need for all commissions to cooperate with other boards and commission in the City in those areas where the programs seem to relate or overlap with other comm ssions. An example of duplication appears under Section 2.37.030, wherein the Commission on Aging would have xis one of their objectives the investigation and study of leisure ti e activities and recreational and social programs for seniors which, of course, is also one o the prime responsibilities of the Parks and Recreation Commission. It is clear to me that where such dual responsibilities exist, the two commissions should make every effort to ooperate and, if possible, meet jointly and make a unified recommendation to the C' Counc'1 in areas where these duplicating roles exist. Iis or finance is adopted, it will require a modification to the duties and responsibilities of the Hum Relations Commission. Several years ago, the City Council modified the Human Relations ommission's ordinance by expanding their duties to include some of those responsi- bilities n proposed for the Commission on Aging. The Housing Coordinator has expressed Form A-113~(Rev. 11/79) L concern ov matters ar which he f sentation in theory, projects w Commission rather tha charged wi must be ma do not nec Page 2, Item Meeting Date 'I 4 1 "l /~4 / ttL icy ~ 'r the new commission's role in future senior housing programs. Currently, such >. taken to the Affordable Housing Subcommittee of the Human Relations Commission, gels is the appropriate group because it includes seniors and young family repre- ss well as education., public service, and business. In his judgment, at least their recommendatiop expresses the broad community's feeling on senior housing rich of ten can have impact on the community as a whole. He believes the on Aging might be mare likely to be perceived as an advocacy group on such issues, i an analytical advisory body. I believe, however, that both committees should be .h the responsibility of addressing affordable housing issues but every effort ie to assure that multiple commission input and recommendations to the City Council ~ssarily bog down thje resolution of such programs. Despite t e concerns that have been raised and the need to make modifications in other Code provision I believe the ordnance as proposed is ready for introduction and subsequent adoption. The necessary modif',ications to the Human Relations Commission ordinance in particula will be prepared for City Council consideration at an early date. FINANCIAL IIMPACT The annua financial impact reisulting from the creation of a Commission on Aging cannot be precisely predicted. The cost', should be similar to the Parks and Recreation, Human Relations, and other similar commissions,'... which cost from $300 to $500 per year not including support staff tim . • ERA:mab ~~~ 6. 4 s ~~° ,~ ;~ ~~ ~. r :.~. u.:::~ -.:,j ~t,w r ~,ti: ~~ /-~ '. ,'. ~~T~T• ' ':/", Y~ ~ ..1' ,.. ITEM TITLE: COUNCIL AGENDA STATF1~tENT Item a70 Meeting Date g__1_62 of the Mayor's Ad Hoc Catmittee an Senior fairs on the F ~ =on of a Commission on Aging SUBMITTED BY: Ct~aitrnan of the Mayor's Hoc C~nmittee (4/5ths Yote: Yes_ Nox ) on Decen`ier 2'.'., 981, the City Council continued a re3uest by Mrs. Margaret Helton to esa~.ablish a Coc ssion on Aging. A motion was made aid unanimously carried "to create an ad hoc conmit with a six~cronth term -the purpose of the co;nnittee will be to set forth the P~Fo and jsstification for establishing a permanent Ccmmission on Aging." The Mayor's Ad Committee on Senior Affairs has conducted an exhaustive study to deteanine the need for a Commission on Aging, Therefore, it is my; RATICdJ: ', That the City Com.~ncil form a Commission on Aging and direct the City Attorney to draft an appzvpriate o~dinance creating said Commission. DISCUSSIGN: The Committee consulted senior c~nnnmity agencies, technical advisors, senior service providers, ands r citizens themselves; conducted a cammRninity mail-in campaign and ttwo well-attend public hearings; and referenced published data fran federal, state and local entiti s on the aging population. In 1974 the State of California and the County of San Diego rewrmmended that local juris- dictions have corfmmissions on aging to address the problems of their populations. Statistics pmvic~ed by the Coun*_y Area Agency on Aging indicate that in 1975, persons over the age of 6~0 in the City of Chula Vista .numbered 6,336; ir. 1980, 13,409 - an increase of over 100 percent i:. fi~~e y~.~a time. F7ith thin increasing]y rapid growth rate (currently l'~5.5, plus, percent of the population of Chula Vista), it becomes vital that a direct link to staff and Council be established to advocate senior needs and help coordinate existing private and goverranental services. On Decerber 17, 11'I974, Mrs. Helton (then a msnber of the City's Human Relations Commission) made an oral preslermtation to the City Council requesting the establishment of such a '~~ aommission. Mrs. Helton had prepared for Council consideration a resolution which delineated the mi~sion she envisioned for such a ammmission, and essentially recite; ~~ the feelings of Mira. Helten bnd others as to the necessity to establish such a ~dy. ~~ At your Decer~er ~,7, 1974 meeting, a motion to approve Mrs. Helton's resolution failed ~~ by a 3-2 vote. T~ entire matter was subsequently referred to the Human Relations ;. Commission, with request that they analyze the possibility of the Cccmimiission mumder- ~, ,taking responsibility for senior affairs. r Qs February 18, 1975, the Human Relations Commission wted unanimously to rend to ~ the City Council that a separate Cammissi.on on Aging be established. When the matter came bark before the City Council with *_hat ridation, a motion to establish such a Commission was defeated, after which former Mayor Hamilton asked that he be allowed : ~bo appoint a Mayor's Ad Hoc Committee ari Aging. The City Council reacted fawrably to ,, ' ' ,~, r K~ ~7~5,~ ~...? ..,rJ,~,,:. , ,,. -.:-~ _~~_ ~~_. b. ''R a ~.,.• ~.~ ..,,}~,ry,I -. !. • .~ ,~ ~, Item Meeting Date 9-21-82 j Page 2 _ that estion, and in about ~pril, °975, a seven mr3rrbes ad hoc amnittee arcs selected. That conti~~ed to be officially recognized until February, 1979, when the group was di ed and Ch:~inanoe 18157 was adopted, expanding the role and responsibilities of the Hunan Relatica~s CoRmiss~ion. Past s of that rorimittee felt that an ad hoc oatmittee does not alarays provide the stator and recognition ma»y Mimes needed for effectiveness. The many needs of the seniors of our oczmnnity are too wide end varied to be covered by an ad hoc cYmnittee or sub- oom,it ee under u axmdssion s+ach as the Human Relations Caimission. A previous r tion of the Human Re~lationa Cc~mission ams the establishment of a Catmissian on ,rather than asub-cc~nuttee for more effective representation and recognition of the varied and unique probl of the elderly, This cottmittee ascertains that failure of tha oarmittee was due in prt to: (1) inclusion as a sub-carmittee; (2) a lack of r tion and stature as a ttee versus the recognition and stature of a carmission; (3) lusion as a whole-bocci part that dealt with Han-senior issues, when in fact senior are a unique populati with unique needs and cir~snstances, It is the consensus of thi oamiittee that these a orementioned issues dictate the need for a separate ccm- missi that has the recognition, awareness, stature and representation not afforded an ad hoc or st~anmittee. In public hearing held an June 16 by the casmittee, the senior c~rnaiity expressed ern about inclusion of the aging as a si~krc,Ynmi*_tee on an aLr y established carmiss an. A sub-carrruttee could lead to less effective senior specif c issues and could tendjto get lost in the whole-bodied issues. The Un ted States Conference o Mayors' publication, Administerin A~in~ P~o notes that a fu:xlamental change is rging in cities' invo vement i.n p anni.ng, rrig and admini tering of programs to fit the elderly. "One of the most significant factors lead' to this change is theamatic demographic shift in the United States over the Past tury." "What makes se statistics of great concern to mayors and local offici l.s is ti^.e ir,,~.,act that tl~e increasing n~rd~er of elderl;~ in cities will have, due to it special needs ard'~service demarxis. Inflation ravages the pocketbooks of senior mJre severely than oth~s because many are living on fixed •irx~nes at or below the y level." "Arai, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, even older Ameri s with more adequate ir~oc~~es are spending Proportionately more than younger citi- zees f necessities like hovsilncj, utilities, food and health care." y to San Diego statisti~'cs, more than too-thirds of the persons over 60 years of nq in the South Bay ar residents of Chula Vista. Chula Vista is fifth-ranked for nutrition and soci services programs cut of forty-Nine identifled sub- , areas of San Diego ty. Out of Chula Vista's senior population of 13,409 Haas, an estimate of 2$'I~ increase for 1982), 1,928 are SSI (Supplemental Security recipientsr 1,096 are minority seniors and 3,509 are aver 75, (as defined by the ericans Act) are "frail elderly" or ones determined with the "most need"). The e feels this information reinforces the justification f~.~r a separate oomnission. involvement in aging programs can be seen as falling on a continuum, At one e contirnnmm cities provide basic municipal services 1[~olice, fire and sanita- their elderly residents. At the other end of the contirnnan a city might be vely and directly irrvolved with a cannrehensive array of aging services, either 4 ~ `~„r~ Y~ ~~ , 1. w~ I :J ii i ~;~ :~~. (i ': Item r_ '~~ ~~ ~i Meeting Date 9-21-82 i n Page 3 :~_ in ci~trac~,-, Oe wider, Planning and ooordinatio~n through an office of aging ty 9wernn.~..t, through a Cannission on Aging, or through advocacy and intes~vvezn- mental relations influexe all federal, state, and local pregrams for older people. ;, The federal g t g~rceived the urgency of aging Programs as uniqua and important in their establi t of the Older Americans Act, and the City of Chula Via-ta has also been aware of the need for aging Pr~'~. presently, the City of Chula Vista is involved in f{ve out of proposed programs of the Mayor's Conference on Aging. Traditional Eerv.ces are Prov'~, such as police, fire and.sanitation. Cannmity centers are under the City's Park andlRecreation De~rtment. Access services are provided through the Senior ~orme-tion and Ref al Center -through such functions as Outresch, General I & R, Intake, ' ~sessment, Arrnng is and Case Management (i.e., follow-up). As a major service '~' Provider, the City tes and manages Norman Park Center, a senior recreation program defined as a direct service in the United States Conference of Mayors''Administerin F rams publication. The City does have a direct and significant role with tFie p ram cation. The C~ty does have a direct and significant role with the County Area Agency on Ag~4 in the of a contract for Title ZZI-B, Information and Referral; a contract with the~~Agency on Aging designated coalitions (ESA,/SCCp~) for shared housing. and a staff* member serving on the Area Agency on Aging Advisory Council, i.e, Human Services Coordinator, Hall. The major program on, not included in the City's senior Program~g, is coordinated P~~9 ~d m3nag t. This oa~mittee p=~poses such a role for a Commission on Aging. (See attached Canni sion on Aging -Charge; Item I.) Cities of like size have put in place a Ccz~mtssion Aging that performs the tasks aforeme.~tioned successfully. The ~~ttee conferred {with the Cities of Oceanside and Coronado and reviewed exsn~ples of other cities with thn CaRmissians, as do~arn~ted 1S1 the publication Adrministerin rams• i, This Cmmtttee rice ins that the preponderance of evidence gathered, coupled with the general knowledge t the older residents of Chula Vista constitute 16 Ix7pulation, indicate an ever-increas a percent of the effectively be addre sed by the form3t~ion of a C~~n's~ion on ~~gre efficiently and FISCAL IMPACT: ,~ $50 ~ ~et~9 ~~$ to support the ccRmission's activities r~uld be approximately '~;~, + t. . 4 ~. nevi' 1 f ~. YN' I S(4 11 . f'. ~ a~ r ~ ..~:°~ .. ,,. ,z , . '~I THE CITY OF C1-NLA VISTA MAYOR'S''.iDHOC COl~ENITTEE ON SENIOR AFFAIRS Tha '~ II Mayor Adhc~c Committee;,on Senior Affairs for six months has conducted an exhaust'!v~ study to determine if there is a need for a Commission on Aging.~l The Committee consulted senior community agencies, technical advisors, senior service providers, and senior citizens them- selves; conducted a community mail-in campaign and two well-attended public hearings; $ rejferenced published data from Federal, State and local entities on the~laging population. The preponderance of evidence gathered, coupled with the general knowledge that the older residents of the City of Chula Yista constitute ' nearly 16~ of the popy~lation, indicates an ever-increasing aging problem. The 1980 census docum$nted a 16~k over 65 population which currently is estimated at 18~C at tY~e reporting in 1982. It is therefore the recommendation of the Mayor's Adhoc Committee ~~ .'J .r~ " ~~,~~~~ • ~. ~., ; ,, on Senior Affairs that a Commission on Aging be established. I. CCA:'~fI5SI0N OI~ AGING - C:iARGE Justification for such a recommendation is based on the following criteria: Need: ! A. To confe'~ with established community agencies and organ- izations, tol',ascertain and consider their views snd suR;estions as to the problems and needs of this community pertaining to the senior citizens and to develop mutual understanding and respect between senior citizens and the community. B. To provide a forum before which senior citizens nay bring their specific problems. ~.~~ ,. E~43IBIT I ,. i ;,q5. ..: f'. 3',r, '~ '~"~ 1 . ~ ~'~ ~ A~. y . _SR ~ F. !~;'.-~ . ;w ,4. ; '~;' .. ~V ® , ~i _~_ C. To hold put~lic meetings and hearings as necessary to permit Jj.Y .. .,~: community inpu~ on matters of concern Lo the elderly population. D. To identif~, study acid analyze these problems and needs and devise methods of focusing the attention of the city and comu~unity and lestablish priorities for solving them. E. To invento~y the City and community resources for dealing with these needs and problems. F. To determi'Ine which agencies, organisations and institu- tions are mostlcapable of dealing with specific needs and problems and t~o recommend development and implementation of effective programs. G. To periodically •review the effectiveness of programs and when necessary, to recommend modification and redirection and use of alternative or additional resources. H. To review proposed city programs containing a senior com- ponent. Thes~ shall be referred to the Commission on Aging for -,; 4+ )~ M1 T t ~~ revie~t and wrlitten comment. I. To detern~'ine whether community recreation and leisure programs and~'~,facilities are meeting the needs of the senior population. J. To determine the extent of educational information programs concerning social services; and to determine whether they are adequate and~lhave proper direction; and to recommend modifications, new programs and redirection if needed. K. To determine the extent of senior volunteer,involvement and participation in the processes of goverr~c.ent and to make recommendations. '..,~ 9 .. ~S1 a~ j .. .. . ~ r ~~~+ ~ 7. ~~. ~: ~ _, s a. .,~~ ~t~ ~~t~:.. rs is ,~ ~ r:~s.;'~ .': ~~ ,~ d. ~„ .. r. II -3- L. To establlish infra-generational progra_*~s which Kill cause and result i-~Ilan int~rchang~ of ideas and activities between the elderly and t~e youth c: our community, M. 1c estzbl$sh a list of priorities on needs and programs and to advoca'e apIpropriate action by the City Council in accordance Kith such lis4s of needs and programs. N, To periodically prepare comprehensive reports to the City Council descri~lbing the Commission's activities, accomplishments and recommendations as to future efforts. II. COMMISSION ON RAGING - CREATION It is further recommended that the Commission on Aging consist• of seven (7) members tb be appointed by the City Council from qualified electors of the city, ', The members sh$11 serve for a term of four years, except that the initial appointment of~two members shall be for a term of one year, two members shall be for a~'iterm of two years, two members shall be for a term of. three years and on~~,membcr shall be .rr a term of tour years; said terms to commence Julyl!,1 to June 30 except for this current year, at which time the term shall begun upon appointment; (beginning the 31st day of•the month of appointment). ',Determination of terms for the members appoin ed shall be undertaken by {Chc Commission on Aging purs~iant to the method deterta.ned by the Commission. Each member shall serve until his/her ' successor is duly appointed and qualified, and all vacancies shall be 1lled for the unexpired term of the member whose place F.as become vacant. The City Manager or his designated representative shall be an ex- s"s; .' dT,•;y',`._, ,. fficio mesaber of tha Commission, but he shall have no vote. `lA~ ;µ~ ~'?~ ~` , r~ fi '~ _ ~ , t. ' ~ ,,, ~w ~.: , ~F .. , -4~ Abs nee from three consecutive o meet~.ngs, withotit former consent of the C ission, shall be decme~d to constitulte the retirement of such mem er a::d the position shad be vacant. Written notice to the address f the mer~e~r provided tq the Commission on Aging by the member shall be given upon the second consecutive absence notifying the member that a t ird consecutive, uncons~nted absence shall result in his/her ~~ retireme t from the Commission. The Commission shall selact~~la Chairman and Vice-Chairman from its membersh P annually. Four membe~s shall constitute a quorum for the transact on of business. The Cotmission shall adopt reasonable rules and regu ations consistent with ~he law, for the government of its business and procedures. The Co~mission shall meet not less than once a month nd at the call of the Chairman, or in his/her absence the Yice-Cha rman, or a majority of ~he members of the Commission. The Commissi n may appoint, at its discretion, committees to concern them- selves w th specific problems. 'these committees may be ccmpose~: of citizens who aro not members of the Commission except that the Chairman of each uch committed must be almember of the Commission on Aging. III. COh ISSION ON AGINC - STIFF ASSISTANCE 6 FINANCIAL SUPPORT It is further recommended ghat the City Manager shall make availabl staff and clerical support to fulfill the iun:tions and duties of the C ission to the extent allowed by law. In the event that private nds or funds from other governmental agencies arc made ~~" ~.. ~~-~ ~~ l ~~5~' t availabl for specific projects, surveys, educational programs or general zagram support, the City Manager is authorized, uion recommendation i ~~- ~ ,;. ti :. ~ '' ~~ ~ i P~- C t~~~yl~ ~' y ~ i '} ~ } ~~ A ~~ ,.. 1j-,;~ III _ 5 _ 5^~' ~, ', „~s;'~ ,° of the Commission and approval of the Council, to enter into a .. ;~~~.I,. :,,^ ',~~"~. o;,'~ l~Y+ '!J;:'" ~,,~~ • • . ~,r,.:, r+: ~y ~., . con~ racts for the utilization of such funds and ppropriate furtheran poses and intent..of, and the duties and functions ce of the pur- f e o the Commission. r'1•~MB ~RS OF THE MAYOR'S AD!-i0C COr4tITTEE ON SENIOR AFFAIRS: ' Don LeCompte, 1615 Elmhurst Street I Chula Vista, 92010 Phone: 421-8576 I lFred Drew, 1275 Banner Avenue ''I Chula Vista, 92011 " 427-1804 'IAnne Fabrick, 501 Anita Street, N2 !, Chula Vista, 92011 " 426-2362 John Kolsters, 501 Anita, N155 Chula Vista, 92011 " 422-4451 ~riscella Maloney, 47 Corte Maria Chula Vista, 92010 " 422-7247 bitty Morrctt, 376 Center Street, N206 Chula Vista, 92010 " 426-8081 ~velyn Gillespie, 4052 Main Street Chula Vista, 92011 " 420-8614 Helen Stokes, 1543 Max Avenue Chula Vista, 92011 ~~ ,.,,, ._.._ STAFF ~'0 TT-{E C0~4~tIT?EE: GLYNDA HALL, HUMAN SERVICES COORDINATOR ~~ JOAN NICHOLSON, RECREATION SUPERVISOR, SENIOR CITIZENS ~ '; ,. e ; x C~ !~w ~ t*M y~ ~:... r.`<.~Pe: ..", 1 N~)~ .Yy ~_,'J~ i., ~~ 1 ~~i ~ ~,~~ M ~, .. ~'-ia.Y~.. .. _. f. i 1~r a. '?r'6i: ~,~,h, 4 C~{~R ,7n., ~y. .~,~ ~` a~ --. fi ~~ ~:~ ~ ~y,~y ~ i, / ,Y2 '', I '' I TWO SITES hhe.r~: Cv~~c.ll ChRtnbe~s - t~ubl-c Serul~Ce. Blola, it ~7 L ~}th Ave. CL.u i+a ~!i's1~ ~~~ 11Yt~G 10 pO A.Yn - 1 ~: po fem. rn. a: ~":` I -~ f: li ~, l~here.~ : Del tZCy N~~h School 103''1 '~" Aue doom 301 @>,.' ~~- . ~t.~~JhCN Juv~e 1L, IqS~- ;~~; i :r>',`pYo~: Greg Co1xS AD HOG Comm tttee r~eec(s Yovr ~"•-' ~Y+1rtf'~ ~oC' Scr\l0/' C~"t-1z.e=rl5 , ~>~'i~ ~, v,^ 7: .,r:lud~w:,~ .. F7ffIIBTT II ,..+...~.:.. ~- .. ~_ ;, ,, ~' "~ '~ ,j ' ,Y ' '. Pt C r.~;~.' _ rY ;'~' . .;~M1~• ,, I t:. '~. Vi MINUTES OF T1IE f:J HOC COMMITTEE ON SENIOR AFF~tIRS PUBLIC HEARINGS June 16, 1982 Thy City •:f Chula Vista Mayor's Ad hoc Committee on Senior Affairs hosted twu vublic hearings on June 16, 1982, Public Hearing One was ,held at the City of Chula Vista Council Chamber, Public Service Buildin~, a76 Fourth`Avenue, 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. This hearing was called t~o order and chaired by Chairman, Don LeCompte, staffed by Joan Nicholson and Glynda Hall. There were 36 citizens in attendance with l0~citizens testifying. All testimonies arc recorded and avail- able for public record. , MSU,C (Motion by George Rodeway of 433 D Street, Apt. A-3, Chula Vista anl~d seconded by Caroline Hough of 73 G Street, Chula Vista). There isllla need for a permanent Commission on Aging. Mangy senior citizen issues were addressed by the citizens and these ar~ so noted on the Public bearing forms and recorded t-stimonies. Th~~Isecond hearing ti•zs held at the Del Rey High School, 1034 Fourth A enue, Room 301, Chula Yista. The meeting was called to order and presided by Chairman Don LeCompte. Staffing was done by Joan Nicholson and Glynda Hall. There were 27 citizens in attendance with ~ formal t~stimony by 6 citizens. MSUC (motion by Clara Welch, 288 F Street, +108, Chula Yista and seconded by Elizabeth Reinke, 288 F Street, • Apt. 304 ,'I Chula Yista), Motion for the City of Chula Vista to form a Commission on Aging to represent the senior citizens. . A list of all participants and their addresses is attached and '',~ submitted is part of these mirsutes. ~~ ~~ / ~~''~ ~. r ~ ' ,. • v ?11 - ,~~ A' `~; L 7LST_ Ir1ONY ' Chula Vist Council chambers Dcl Rey Ifi h School Adams, Sal y * Augenstcin ~dartha C. Bailey, Ati nie Biberman, ibil Boysei, Be tha E. 8ukoskie, sabel * Culver, Ch istine Cupp, Janc D'Argenio, Florence D'Argenio, Maurice Dennison, aniel H. Fabrick, A ne Fishur, Ce evieve ' Graham, Bo Graham, Pe rl Guthrie, dy Guthrie, wise Hayner, Selma 14. ' !lelton, Margaret * Holley, J. S. * Hough, C. 1. Johnson, amuei Johnson, onnie King, Rut Latimer, mily L. Leders, ~1 rgaret Y. Lefinen, E Glyn F. Leonard, race S. ' t•tatthew, . ue. AfacDougal Donald J MacDougal Lucille Afac;Naught n, Gwen Mier, Ann Miles, Lo ise Mitchell, Pearl Alorrett, Murphy, A ice Owens, E a Phillips, Lillian Pi~der, n 0. Podesta, ulis Reinke, E izabeth • Rode~rXy,G orgc ' Sale, The ma Salad, Ala tiniano Suvetter, Beatrico Shaff, Ro ie A. • SzoadesKa hleen Stallard, Irene Stevens, ina • Stores, E in R. `-;, Mard, Le "Matson,, iu atson; .S. tea.-..~.,..e~ ~a ~a~ . '. Public Hering - Senior Affairs Commission l~ttendance: 321'G Street, C. V. 288~F Street, x502, C.V. 349', Church 9Ave. , C.Y. 697 J Street, C•.V. 2881 F Street, C.?I. 288',F Street, M1303 1B4,5 I Ave., National City 100Woodlawn Ave., Sp. 10, C.V. 718-B Madison Ave., C. V. „ „ ~~ 659~Jefferson Ave., C.V. SO11-2 Anita Street, C.Y. 2881, F Street, Apt. 1512, C.Y. 14215-184 Second, C. V. 145 Second, K184, C.V. 135',0 Costa Ave., C.V. „', „ „ 28~ F Street, N912, C. V. 16 Mankato St., C. V. 102 Second Ave., C.V. 731 G Street, C. V. 28 F St., Apt. 1512, C. V. 364 B Roosevelt, C.Y. 28$ F Street, C. V. 18 Third Avc., 11616, C. V. 28 F St., Apt. 1507, C.V. 28 G St., X1207, C.V. 28 F St., Apt. 511, C. V. Fr dericka - 183 - 3rd Ave., C.V. 23~' H Street, C,V. ~, ~~ ~~ 288 F Street, Apt. 510, C. V. I' C. V. t' Apt. 1602, C. V. 305 Yia Bissolatti, C. V. 375 Center Strcct, C.V. 28~ F Street, C-2 334 Church Ave., C.Y. 63;~ I Street, C. V. 28j8 Broadway, Sp. 112, C.Y. 288 F Street, Apt. 304, C.V. " 1511, C.V. 4313 D Street, Apt. A-3, C. V. 11'0 N Second Ave., ~'S6, C. V. 1450 Greenbay St., X106, S. D. 288 F Street, C.Y. 288 F Street, 8604, C.Y. 234 H Street, C.V. 288 F Street, Apt. 702, C.V. 288 F.Street, Apt. 107, C.Y. 1481-161 Third Ave., C.Y. 283 F Street, Apt. 401, C.Y. 139 3rd Ave., C.Y. 139 Third Ave., C.Y. For X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Z X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X AA a X ~~~~ ; f .. ..~, ~, . . _~ .~..,: ~;~+: ~.,t '. i ~~. ~3; ~'~ ~. ~~! . iw'y . 1~ `Y~~ 1` :~ ~~i~ f(J+,'.. .k~~ F 4:; .4 ~_,r' J`~~ ~r~. ~~ j't :: S;se$ rf , ~1~-4 ~ ~} M ~ ~~~up~ # gP3ur~,}t ~s ~_:i K, 41 f ` .' ®, '~y~ .'y. ~5• :~* r .. . ~~',: t ~r~.s :?r ' I ~'-~ Belch, Clara I~ '``~` Melton, George ya~~~~;`-~, Milliamson, Hel,kn ~': 3''' ~I ;,~ *' Fishman, Samuel 1, " Roake, Elizabeth 1 288 F Street, A"108, C.V. X 2059 Ilex Ave., Apt. 101, San Diego X 310 Via Bissolotti, C. V. X i y^.- 7~ j.tt:~ did . ,Li { ~ `' ~~ '~i ~i' ~~-:. D~ s ''~r'~ r - . ~_'. J t ._.. . i ~~ r'~ y~ 5 ,; ~1 .. iM-, t h k,,,p.. k,~~ ~: M ~ 'r ~ ~ ~~ .. - ., .A ~. Y• y~ ~.:1