HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda statement 1982/11/02 Item 8COIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~
Item 8
Meeting Date 11/2/82
I~ TIT E: Resolution - A rovin a Second Amendment to the Contract Planner's
//D~ pp 9
Agreement
SUBMITTED BY: City Manager
On Augusi
Land Use
commence
was at $:
pursued
approved
Planning
provided
of a pert
level of
(4/5ths Vote: Yes No X )
18, 1981, the City Council approved an agreement with Bud Gray to update the
Element of the General Plan. Under terms of the agreement, the services were to
on September 1, 1981 and terminate 18 months later on March 1, 1983. Compensation
3,000 per month, not to exceed $54,000 for the full term of the contract. P1r. Gray
;he work required under the terms of the contract until May, 1982, when the Council
the first amendment to the agreement which appointed him as Acting Director of
upon the resignation of Mr. Jim Peterson. The first amendment to the agreement
that his service as Acting Director of Planning would continue until the employment
nanent Director, or a maximum of 6 months, whichever occurs first, at a compensation
$3,300 per month.
Our rece t action in deferring the recruitment process for a new Director of Planning
requires a second amendment to the agreement to provide for the continued employment of
Mr. Gray as Acting Director. It is therefore my
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the resolution.
)MMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N.A.
DISCUSSI
The amen ed agreement again provides for Mr. Gray`s continued employment as Acting
Director of Planning until a new Director is selected, or a maximum of s%x months, which-
ever occ rs first. The only changes in the second amendment as proposed would be to raise
the comp nsation level from $3,300 to $3,600 per month and to extend the term of the
original agreement for the period Mr. Gray serves as Acting Director of Planning. This
monthly ompensation is under contractual arrangements and therefore no additional expenses
are incu red by the City for retirement benefit costs or other fringe benefits. The
monthly ompensation, since fringe costs are not involved, is slightly less than
Mr. Pet rson would have received had he remained in the City's employ.
FINANCIAIL IMPACT
SufficiE
the terr
ERA:mab
•
~t funds are included in the Planning Department's budget to meet the cost under
of the contract.
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)
~;.
C?u~ia Vls.:~, ..~=Gi"I~,~
Darted ~~~'~~
/G.~