Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/01/11 Item 6CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~«r. ~ ~ ~ '~-'' CHULA VISTA January 11, 2011, Item No.: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: PCM-10-07/DRC 10-08 Consideration of applications filed by Integral Partners XXVI, LLC for Eastlake Property Owner, LLC ("Integral Partners") requested amendments to the Eastlake III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and associated Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use District Map to develop an 18.4 acre site with a 389-unit condominium project. Along with requested amendments to the SPA Plan is request for design review approval of the project. The site is located at the southwest corner of Olympic Parkway and Wueste Road. RESOLUTION: of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista considering the addendum to FEIR-OS-02; approving amendments to the Eastlake III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) and associated regulatory documents for 18.4 acres at the southwest corner of Olympic Parkway and Wueste Road. ORDINANCE: of the City of Chula Vista approving amendments to the Eastlake III Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use Disticts Map for 18.4 acres at the southwest corner of Olympic Parkway and Wueste Road. RESOLUTION: of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista granting a Design Review Permit for a proposed 389 unit condominium project for 18.4 acres at the southwest corner of Olympic Parkway and Wueste Road. SUBMITTED BY: Assistant City Managrector of Development Services REVIEWED BY: City Manager S~_ 4/Sths Vote :_ Yes X No 6-1 Meeting Date: O1/11/ll Page 2 BACKGROUND Integral Partners XXVI, LLC, for Eastlake Property Owner, LLC ("Integral Partners", the "applicant," or the "developer") is proposing to develop a condominium project, consisting of 389 units, on a 18.4 acre site (the "Olympic Pointe" project). The project site is located at the most easterly boundazy of the Eastlake III planned community (see Attachment 1- Locator Map). The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Eastlake III SPA Plan in order to revise applicable sections of the SPA document to replace reference to the former approved Windstar Pointe Resort project with applicable references Yo Olympic Pointe. The parking standards will be updated with the proposed amendment to reflect the additional bedrooms and parking needs required by this project. In June 2006, an amendment to the General Plan, as well as the Eastlake III General Development Plan (GDP) and SPA Plan was approved in order to change the Visitor Commercial land use designation to Residential High to accommodate a 494 unit active seniors condominium project. While the project received the necessary SPA Plan amendment, prior to going forward to the Design Review Committee for approval of the actual development project, the applicant withdrew the request for economic reasons. Following the previous applicant's (Puelte's) cancellation of the escrow, The Eastlake Company sold the site to Windstar in January, 2007. In 2008, the Windstar project was approved as 494 unit residential units and was similar to that of the former Puelte project with the main difference being market rate rental units. With the downturn in the economy, the Windstar project was never constructed. In January, 2010, the applicant for the currently requested 389 unit Olympic Pointe project entered into a purchase agreement with Windstar. When the 2008 Amendment to the Eastlake III SPA was approved, the existing Residential Multi-Family 1 (RM-1) land use district was created as a "Project Specific Land Use District". It was designed to be used exclusively for the development of the former 494 unit Windstar project. The primary purpose of this amendment is to remove the "project specific" restriction of the RM-1 district. The proposal includes both a request for a SPA Amendment and Design Review approval. The project would be subject to the new consolidated permit processing provisions pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) section 19.14.050 (C). Under the new consolidated review process, the City Council will be considering and acting on the SPA Plan Amendment and the Design Review permit. The design of the project was presented at a community meeting on July 28, 2010 and also reviewed by a Design Review Board member. The project was found consistent with applicable design guidelines. This item was continued from the City Council Meeting of December 14, 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, Eastlake III Senior 6-2 Meeting Date: O1/11/11 Page 3 Housing Project, FEIR OS-02. The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessazy and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an addendum to this document, Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, Eastlake III Senior Housing Project, FEIR OS-02. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council (1) consider the Addendum to FEIR OS-02; (2) adopt the Resolution approving amendments to the Eastlake III Sectional Planning Area Plan, Public Facilities Finance Plan and associated regulatory documents for 18.4 acres based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; and (3) adopt the Ordinance approving amendments to the Eastlake III Planned Community ("PC") District Regulations and Land Use Districts Map for 18.4 acres subject to the findings contained therein, and (4) adopt the Resolution granting a Design Review Permit for a proposed 389 unit condominium project. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: On November 10, 2010, the Planning Commission voted (5-1-0-1) to recommend that the City Council consider the Addendum and adopt the Ordinance and Resolution approving this Project (see Attachment 2, meeting minutes). On December 20, 2010, the Design Review Board (DRB) reviewed the project and had no comments on the project design (see Attachment 7, meeting notes). The project will go back to the DRB on January 10, 2011 for formal recommendation, which will be presented verbally to the City Council on January 11, 2011. DISCUSSION: Site Location and Surrounding Uses The site is situated at the most easterly portion of the Eastlake III planned community. The community is fully developed, except for the subject property and a 12 acre commercial site to the north of the Olympic Training Center (OTC). The approximately 18.4 acre site is located on the south side of the Olympic Parkway terminus, bounded by the OTC to the west and south, a future retail commercial site to the north of and fronting on Olympic Parkway, and Lower Otay Lake east of Wueste Road. The Mountain Hawk community park in the Vistas Neighborhood is to the northeast (see Attachment 1-Locator Map). The site has been mass graded as part of the Eastlake III planned community, resulting in an approximately 10 to15-foot high manufactured slope at the top of a 40-foot high natural slope at the eastern and southern edge of the site. A description of the surrounding land uses, General Plan, and Zoning designations is outlined on the following page: 6-3 Meeting Date: 01/11/11 Page 4 Summary of Surrounding Land Uses General Plan CV Municipal PC District Land Existing Land Use Code Zoning Use Designation Site Residential High; Planned Residential High; Vacant Open Space Community (PC) Open Space North Commercial Retail Planned Village Commercial Vacant Community (PC) South Public/ Quasi Public Planned Community Public/ Quasi Public Olympic Training (pC) Center East Open Space Open Space (OS) Not a part Lower Otay Reservoir West Public/Quasi Public Planned Community Public/Quasi Public Olympic Training (pC) Center Project Description: The project proposes to construct 389 condominium units on an 18.4 acre parcel. The project will include the following types of product: 1) two-story triplex units; 2) three-story row homes and; 3) three-story carriage row homes. Private streets within the project consist of a main entrance road, a loop road around the perimeter of the site, and alleys which provide access to the majority of the condominium units. Parking for the units will be provided in garages, with surface parking for guests and visitors. A recreation center with pool will be located in the southeast corner of the project. The entrance to the project will be off Olympic Parkway. The project is proposing certain amendments to the Eastlake III SPA Plan, more specifically described below: Eastlake III SPA Plan - Text/Map The applicant has applied to amend the Eastlake III SPA Plan, Development Standards, Design Guidelines, and PFFP in order to replace all reference to the former Windstar project with reference to the Olympic Pointe project. The proposed changes include the following: a) Anew project description and development plans; b) Amend the Site Utilization Plan to reflect a reduction in units from 494 to 389 (see Attachment 5, SPA Tab); c) Amend the Eastlake III SPA Plan, Development Standards and District Regulations to remove reference to the Windstar Pointe Resort apartment project and replace with the Olympic Pointe condominium project. This includes amending the existing RM-1 development standards to reflect parking standards for four bedroom units. Design 6-4 Meeting Date: O1/11/11 Page 5 standards acid exhibits would be amended to include design reference to the Olympic Pointe project (see Attachment 5, PC District Regs. Tab, Design Guidelines Tab); d) Public Facilities Finance Plan Amendment to address the public facility needs associated with the proposed Olympic Pointe project (see Attachment 6); e) Affordable Housing Update to reflect project (see Attachment 5, Affordable Housing Tab); and f) Air Quality Improvement Plan and Water Conservation Plan Amendments to reflect change in project characteristics and implementation measures (see Attachment 5, AQIP Tab, WCP Tab). ANALYSIS: Analysis of Project Data The following is a summary of the project's compliance with the Eastlake III Development Standards: Eastlake III SPA Desi nation: H /Residential Hi h Current Zonin PC Planned Communi ) PC District Re ulations Land Use District RM1 / Multi -family Lot Area: 18.4 Acres REOUiRED/ALLOWED: PROPOSED: SITE UTILIZATION PLAN ALLOWANCE Units: 494 units 389 units Density: 26.8 du/acre 21.2 du/ac PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: • Building setbacks determined by Site Plan (measured from property line) Minimum: 15 feet Maximum: 56 feet • Maximum Building Height: 4-5 stories or 50 28 feet/ two stories for triplex buildings feet. Architectural features up to 65 feet. and 37 feet/ three stories for row and carria e row home roducts. (as amendedl • Required Parkine Proposed Spaces _ Garage (resident) = 7"78 Resident parking: Open (guest) = 117 2 bedroom unit = 2 spaces Total = 895 spaces 3 bedroom unit = 2 spaces 4 bedroom unit = 2 spaces Guest parking = .3 spaces per unit Total Re uired arkin = 895 s aces 6-5 Meeting Date: O1/11/11 Page 6 As described in the table above, the proposed 389-unit condominium project is consistent with the existing RM-1 land use district designation and therefore the required amendments to both the Eastlake SPA Plan and PC District Regulations are minor in nature. Other than a clarification as to the required parking standards, the remaining amendments associated with land use are primarily to replace text and exhibits specific to the Windstar project with those of Olympic Pointe project. Eastlake III SPA Plan Amendment and PC District Regulations The amendment to the SPA Plan defines the development parameters, including implementation of the proposed GDP land use designation, urban design criteria, circulation, public facilities, Water Conservation Plan, Air Quality Improvement Plan and other necessary components to ensure the proper integration of the Olympic Pointe Resort project into the existing surrounding residential, commercial and public-quasi public uses. The Eastlake III PC District Regulations function as the zoning regulations for the project. The PC District Regulations provide standards and regulations to guide the development of the site and ongoing regulation of the use of the property. These regulations are applied in conjunction with the Eastlake III Design Guidelines to ensure the uses within the project are compatible and well designed. The amendment to the Eastlake III PC District Regulations consists primarily of modifying the parking standards due to the unique nature of the project (see discussion under "Parking"). Building Height Unlike the previous residential projects approved for this site (including Windstar and Senior Project), the proposed building height for Olympic Pointe project is lower and more typical of the three story multi-family projects allowed under the Residential (RM) Multi Family Designation. The maximum height would be three stories or 37 feet. The maximum height of the Senior Project was four stories (48 feet). For the Windstar project, buildings ranged between three and four stories (35-50 feet). As a result, the projects two and three story products would result in less visual impact than the former residential project. Parking Typically, the established multi-family parking standards are designed to include guest parking and the parking standard varies depending upon the number of bedrooms in the unit. This project proposes two covered spaces per unit regardless of the number of bedrooms. Open parking is provided primarily for use by guests of the residents. A total of 895 parking spaces would be provided included 778 spaces within two car garages (for residents) and 117 open parking spaces (for guests). Adequate parking would be provided. 6-6 Meeting Date: O1/ll/11 Page 7 Eastlake III SPA Plan-Design Guidelines: The Eastlake III Design Guidelines stipulate design parameters that pertain to site planning, landscape architecture, architecture and signage for the 18.4-acre site. The Design Guidelines contain illustrations and written requirements to implement the design ideas presented therein. Some of the urban design guidelines also emphasize quality design, site development character and conceptual building/parking/open space relationships within the project. Because of the importance of unifying themes and designs over an extended period of time until full build-out, the Design Guidelines are utilized to ensure overall consistency while allowing for flexibility at the detailed site plan level. For example, while the design guidelines would indicate that building facades should include relief to avoid a monotonous appearance, there is flexibility as to how an individual project and provide the necessary building or facade offsets in order to achieve this. The Eastlake III Design Guidelines have been updated to include the conceptual design for the Olympic Pointe Project, to ensure that the physical appearance will compliment the type of other developments within the Eastlake III planned community. Architecture/Site Layout The Multi-Family Design Guidelines of Eastlake III SPA indicate that building architecture should incorporate a variety of units, building sizes and heights, and color accents. The project proposes a site layout whereby the variation in size of building products provides an even distribution of buildings throughout the entire site rather than the clustered design of the previously approved project. The previous Windstar project contained only 18 residential buildings. The proposed project contains three product types housed in a total of 92 residential buildings of various sizes. The two-story triplex buildings would flank the project on the north, east and south, with the three-story row house products occurring in the interior and west side where visibility from surrounding areas would not be a concern. As alluded to above, under building height, this would be a visual change from the former project which had three-story structures along the north and eastern portion of the site The varying sizes of the carriage row home buildings allows For relief from the monotonous appearance caused by long expanses of building fapade as well as a curvilinear street pattern through the area. In addition, fagade plane offsets are provided on the building elevations through the use of pop-out, recesses and staggered roof lines. All of these features are encouraged by the Multi-Family design guidelines. As discussed above, the project has been reviewed for design consistency with the Design Guidelines of the Eastlake III SPA Plan (as proposed for amendment). Due to the limited scope of these guidelines, the multi-family section of the Chula Vista Design Manual was also referred to for items such as location of and adequacy of open space and was found to be consistent. EastGake III SPA Plan-Public Facilities Finance Plan The amended Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) has been prepared by third-party consultants. in order to analyze any changes resulting from the reduction from the former Windstar 494 luxury apartment units to the proposed 389 condominium units for Olympic Pointe. As required 6-7 Meeting Date: O1/11/11 Page 8 by the City's Growth Management Ordinance, the proposed amendment to the Eastlake III PFFP analyzes the impact on public facilities and services and identifies the required public facilities and services needed to serve the 18.4-acre site of the Olympic Pointe Project to maintain consistency with the City's Quality of Life Threshold Standards. The PFFP describes in detail the cost, financing mechanism and timing fox constructing public facilities. The public facilities needed to serve the project will be guaranteed by placing conditions of approval on the design review permit, payment of outstanding fees at the building permit stage, and/or continuing payment of bond payments under the approved Community Facilities Districts to finance or maintain public facilities. The PFFP consists of the analysis of transportation, drainage, water, sewer, fire, schools, libraries, parks, and fiscal impacts of the project, as described below: Txansportation/Circulation A traffic impact report was prepared by traffic consultant, Linscott, Law and Greenspan (LLG) dated September 22, 2010. The analysis concluded that the proposed project, would not cause any impacts to the surrounding street network and intersections requiring mitigation beyond those identified within FEIR OS-02. The traffic analysis for the proposed project analyzed changes in trip distribution within the project site and off-site traffic volumes and levels of service and direct and cumulative traffic related impacts upon the General Plan Update Circulation Element roadways. Because the Addendum for the proposed project is based upon the Senior Housing Project FEIR, the comparisons regarding trip generation are made between that project rather than the more recently approved Windstar project. As identified within the traffic analysis, the proposed Project results in approximately 2,334 average daily trips (ADT) per SANDAG trip generation figures. This marks an increase of 358 ADTs from the previously approved Senior Housing Project. At the same time, it is approximately .624 ADTs lower than the former Windstar project (which would generate 2,964 ADT's). The prior installation and operation of the signal light at Wueste Road and Olympic Parkway and the opening in Fa112007 of the SR 125, and required compliance with the mitigation measures identified within the Eastlake III Senior Housing Project Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report FEIR 05- 02, will offset any additional traffic volume associated with the project Olympic Parkway, afour-lane Major Arterial Road, will serve the Olympic Pointe project. Regional access will be provided primarily by SR-125, approximately two miles to the west. Interstate 805 is located approximately seven miles to the west and also provides links to regional transportation facilities. The timing for installation o€ required public improvements and financing mechanisms are discussed in the Olympic Pointe Supplemental Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) (see Attachment 6). Street improvements required to serve the project are identified in the PFFP and Eastlake Seniors EIR. These improvements include: • Westbound Olympic Parkway: One left-turn lane (with 100 feet of storage) and two through lanes; • Northbound Olympic Parkway (at project driveway): One lefr-turn lane and one right- turn lane (with a storage length of 75 feet in each) 6-S Meeting Date: O1/ll/11 Page 9 • Eastbound Olympic Parkway: One shared through/right lane and one through lane; • Relocate the median opening on Olympic Parkway, further west from its current location to accommodate the proposed project driveway; • A signal shall be installed and two outbound (northbound) lanes, one left-turn and one right-turn inbound (southbound) lanes to be provided at the project driveway; and • Install a "No U Turn" sign for eastbound traffic on Olympic Parkway at the Olympic Parkway/Wueste Road intersection. No significant traffic impacts were identified in the traffic analysis, and the existing mitigation measures contained in EIR OS-02 have been determined to be equally applicable to the proposed project. The Olympic Pointe Project will be conditioned to implement previously identified mitigation measures. Drainage The 18.4-acre site lies within the Otay Lakes Drainage Basin. However, runoff from the site is diverted into the Salt Creek Basin to prevent impacts to the Lower Otay Reservoir. Presently, runoff from the site is discharged into a 42-inch pipe and into the City's storm water conveyance system in Olympic Parkway, which ultimately discharges into Salt Creek. The project will be conditioned to provide for the conveyance of storm water flows in accordance with City standards, policies and requirements. The Developer will design, install and maintain on-site erosion protection. All permanent or temporary erosion control will be designed to City standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Further, the project shall comply with all Federal, State and Local storm water runoff and discharge regulations. Water The Otay Water District will provide water service for the Olympic Pointe Project. The Otay Water District has facilities in the vicinity of the project that can provide water service. It has been determined by the OWD that the project will not receive recycled water for landscaping since it is in an area that drains into the adjacent Lower Otay Reservoir. Land that drains into the Upper or Lower Otay Reservoir is restricted from using recycled water for landscape irrigation to avoid the potential for contamination of drinking water. The projected average day potable water demand (ADD) for the Olympic Pointe Project is approximately 98 gpm (gallons per minute). This is less than the 173 gpm estimated for the former Windstar project. The fire flow is 8,000 gallons per minute (gpm), for a duration of 4 hours which meets the City's requirements. This is the same fire flow requirement as the former Windstar project. There is adequate off-site storage capacity to meet both potable water and fire flow demands. Sewer Sewer service to the project site is provided by the City of Chula Vista. The Olympic Pointe Project is located in the Salt Creek drainage basin. The project will connect to the existing eight 6-9 Meefing Date: O1/11/11 Page 10 and 12-inch gravity sewer mains located north of Olympic Parkway in the approved Vistas Neighborhood C-1 (commercial) site of the Eastlake SPA Plan. This sewer collects flows generated from the Vistas Neighborhood VR-9, VR-10, VR-11 (residential) and C-1 (commercial) sites and conveys the flows to the 15-inch diameter main in Olympic Parkway. The 15-inch main connects to the 18-inch Salt Creek Interceptor. The capacity of these facilities to serve the proposed project has been assessed in the Final Eastlake Peninsula off-site Sewer Capacity Analysis Study dated November 8, 2005, by PBS&J. The 2005 study determined that the off-site sewer capacity for the Eastlake Seniors was adequate. The Seniors project approved in 2006, was projected to generate an average flow of 98,800 gpd (gallons per day) into the Salt Creek Interceptor. In 2007, the Windstar Pointe Resort was subsequently proposed for the same property. PBS&J prepared the Final Windstar Pointe Resort Off-Site Sewer Capacity Analysis Study, dated July 17, 2007. PBS&J reviewed the 2005 study and found it adequate and no changes were required. The 2007 study determined that the 494 unit Windstar Pointe project would generate an average flow of 98,800 GPD. The study was again updated for the proposed project by PBS&J, Olympic Pointe Off-Site Sewer Capacity Analysis Study dated April 2, 2010. This latest study by PBS&J determined that the project would generate 77,800 gpd (a decrease of the average flow by 21,000 gpd) and that there are no significant impacts to the existing off- site wastewater facilities. Projected wastewater flows from the Olympic Pointe Pointe Project will ultimately discharge into the Salt Creek Interceptor. Fire Development of the proposed Project is not anticipated to change the need for fire service in the area. The existing Fire Station N. 8, located at 1180 Woods Drive in the Eastlake Woods neighborhood, would be the primary station to serve the project. Schools Although the proposed project would result in fewer units than the previously approved Windstar project, it will still generate an increase in dwelling units with school age population in the project area. At completion, it is anticipated the proposed Project could generate approximately 170 students. Area schools are of adequate size to accommodate the additional school children and, therefore, the development will not result in a need for new schools. It is anticipated that the project would need to house approximately 97 elementary school age children. Anew elementary school is anticipated to be constructed at 1650 Exploration Drive in Village 11 of Otay Ranch, which would be the nearest school (at completion) to the project. Students would be bused to a nearby school should the construction of this school not be completed by the time the project becomes occupied. It is anticipated that the approximately 25 middle school students generated from the project will attend Eastlake Middle School located approximately 3 miles north of the project. It is anticipated that the approximately 48 high school students generated from the project will attend Eastlake High School located approximately 3 miles northeast of the, project at Eastlake Parkway and Clubhouse Drive. The property has been included in the Mello Roos Community Facilties district and bonded to cover its fair share cost of these new schools. 6-10 Meeting Date: O1/11/11 Page 11 Parks The project is served by the newly constructed Mountain Hawlc community park, located approximately ''/o-quarter mile northeast. The developer will be required to pay in-lieu acquisition fees along with development PAD fees prior to issuance of building permits. Eastlake III SPA Plan-Water Conservation Plan: The City's Growth Management Ordinance requires the preparation of a Water Conservation Plan (WCP) for all major projects in accordance with the City's Water Conservation Plan Guidelines. The average daily water demand (ADD) for the project is 98 gpm (gallons per minute). Numerous features have been included in the proposed project to minimize the use of water during the construction and operation of the project. The water conservation measures incorporated into the project as required by the City's WCP Guidelines include hot water pipe insulation, pressure reducing valves, water-efficient dishwashers, dual flush toilets as well as water-efficient landscaping and the use of evapotranspiration controllers. The estimated potable water savings with these conservation measures is 0.009 MGD or 4% of the total ADD. The project WCP demonstrates the value of incorporating water conservation measures in buildings and irrigation systems for residential development. The implementation of these measures will contribute to preserving a valuable natural resource. A replacement Addendum has been prepared for the project to reflect these new standards. Eastlake III SPA Plan-Air Quality Improvement Plan: An Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP) was prepared for the Eastlake III area in accordance with the City's Growth Management Ordinance and the Growth Management Program. AQIPs must be prepared for all residential projects containing 50 dwelling units or more. The project was previously evaluated under the 2002 AQIP Guidelines. An Addendum to the AQIP was adopted in 2008 exclusively for the former Windstar project, which indicated the applicant opted to comply with the GreenStar program. The City's AQIP guidelines were updated in 2009, which now require developers to comply with the Green Building and Energy Efficiency Ordinances, CVMC 15.12 and 15.26.030 respectively. These require developers/applicants to implement sustainable design features and improve building energy conservation 15% to 20% above 2008 State Energy Code requirements. A replacement Addendum has been prepared for the project to reflect these new standards. Affordable Housing Plan: The proposed Olympic Pointe Project would require the provision of twenty-five (25) Low Income units. Windstar Pointe Master, LLC and the Eastlake Development Company, entered into an Agreement to post security for an Affordable Housing Obligation and a subsequent Amendment with the City in 2008 and 2009 to satisfy this requirement. In compliance with the 6-11 Meeting Dater O1/11/11 Page 12 terms of the Agreement to satisfy the affordable housing obligation, Eastlake paid $2 million to the City for the ownership, transfer and use of twenty-five (25) low income housing credits resulting from the 143-unit Landings II affordable housing development in the Winding Walk neighborhood of Otay Ranch Village 11. The Landings II development is currently under construction, and is expected to be completed by November 2011. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICTS: Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property, which is subject to this action. CURRENT FISCAL YEAR IMPACT: The applicant has paid for all costs associated with the processing of the proposed SPA amendment and Design Review request. ONGOING FISCAL YEAR IMPACT: The proposed Project was required to estimate the fiscal impact that the proposed amendment will have on the City of Chula Vista operation and maintenance budgets. The fiscal analysis presents fixture revenues and expenditures in current (2010) dollars. Also, revenues and expenditures are presented annually, reflecting a conservatively projected development absorption schedule based on information provided by the Developer. This approach identifies annual project fiscal surpluses and deficits and represents a more realistic approach when compared to assumed instant build-out. The fiscal revenues to the City associated with the Olympic Pointe Project range from $54,800 annually and rise to $309,000 at build-out. Fiscal expenditures would be initially $49,500 and rise to $279,300 at build-out. The net fiscal impact from developing the Olympic Pointe project is positive through-out the development and results in annual net surplus of $29,700 at build- out. Attachments 1 Locator 2 Planning Commission Resolution and November 10, 2010 Minutes 3 Addendum to FEIR-OS-02 4 Ownership Disclosure Form 5 Eastlake III SPA Plan Amendment-Binder 6 Public Facilities Financing Plan Amendment 7 Design Review Board meeting notes of December 20, 2010 Prepared by: Jeff Steichen, Associate Planner, Development Services Department 1: \p I anning\caseti le\ 10- I I \PC M 10-07\Iie ports\CC 6-12 ATTACHMENT 1 LOCATOR MAP 6-13 r 0 o Jw T ATTACHMENT 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION AND MEETING MINUTES 6-15 RESOLUTION NO. PCM-10-07 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER THE ADDENDUM TO FEIR OS-02 AND APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE III SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, EASTLAKE III PLANNED COMMIJNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND LAND USE DISTRICTS MAP, PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN (PFFP), AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS FOR 18.4 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OLYMPIC PARKWAY AND WUESTE ROAD WHEREAS, on April 12, 2010, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Integral Partner XXVI, LLC for Eastlake Project Owner, LLC ("Developer"), requesting approval of amendments to the Eastlake III SPA Plan and Eastlake III Planned Community District Regulations and associated regulatory documents including Design Guidelines, PFFP, Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP) and Water Conservation Plan (WCP) for 18.4 acres located at the intersection of Olympic Parkway and Wueste Road ("Project); and, WHEREAS, a Tentative Subdivision Map (Chula Vista Tract 06-I1) to allow 389 condominium units on the project site was approved on June 20, 2006 based upon the previous Eastlake Seniors project; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Quality Act (CEQA) and has detemuned that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, Eastlake III Senior Housing Project, FEIR OS-02. The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document aze necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent documents have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director has prepazed an addendum to this document, Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, Eastlake III Senior Housing Project, FEIR OS-02; and WHEREAS, the Plarming Commission fmds that the Addendum to FEIR-OS-02 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula V ista; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Director set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and it mailing to property owners and within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property, at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and, 6-16 WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m., November 10, 2010, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and the hearing was thereafter closed. NOW THEREFORE, THE CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: I. SPA FINDINGS THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE EASTLAKE III GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN. The proposed amendments to the Eastlake III SPA Plan reflect land uses that are consistent with the Eastlake III General Development Plan and the City of Chula Vista General Plan. The residential nature of the proposed use would be consistent with the adoptedhigh-density residential designation for the project site and compatible with the surrounding residential and open space land uses of the Eastlake area. SEQUENTIALIZED DDEVELOPMENTDOF T INVLOLVED SOECTIONAL PLANNING AREAS. The requested amendments to the Eastlake III SPA plan include a PFFP that outlines the required infrastructure to serve the Project, the timing of installation and the financing mechanisms to promote the orderly sequentialized development of the Project. The Project is one of the last areas of Eastlake III to be developed. THE EASTLAKE III SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIltCULATION GR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. The proposed modifications to land use and development standard provisions within the Project Site have been fully analyzed anc'. will not adversely affect the circulation system and overall land use as previously envisioned in the Eastlake III General Development Plan. An Addendum to FEIR-OS-02 has been prepared and the Development Services Director has determined that any impacts associated with the proposed amendments have. been previously addressed by FEIR-OS-02; and thus, the requested amendments to the SPA will not adversely affect the adjacent land uses, residential enjoyment, circulation or envirotunental quality of the surrounding uses. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL AND RESEARCH USES, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL. BE APPROPRIATE IN AREA, LOCATION, AND OVERALL DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE SUCH AS TO CREATE A RESEARCH OR INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED DESIRt1BILITY AND STABILITY; AND, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WII.L MEET 6-17 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THIS TITLE. The proposed project is not an industrial or research project THE STREETS AND THOROUGHFARES ARE SUITABLE AND ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC THEREON. The potential impacts to traffic and circulation have been thoroughly analyzed based upon the proposed Project resulting in specific requirements that must be complied with at the time of development within the Project area. This includes payment of Transportation Development Impact fees (TDIF) and construction of project entrance improvements to Olympic Parkway and construction of a traffic signal at the Project entrance. ANY PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CAN BE JUSTIFIED ECONOMICALLY AT THE LOCATION(S) PROPOSED AND WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE COMMERCIAL FACILITIES. OF THE TYPES NEEDED AT SUCH PROPOSED LOCATION(S). The proposed project is not a commercial project. THE AREA SURROUNDING SAID DEVELOPMENT CAN BE PLANNED AND ZONED IN COORDINATION AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPATIBILITY WITH SAID DEVELOPMENT. The proposed amendments are consistent with the previously approved plans and regulations applicable to surrounding sites and therefore the proposed amendments can be planned and zoned in coordination and substantial compatibility with said development. II. PFFP FINDINGS THE AMENDMENT TO THE EXISITNG PFFP COMPLIES WITH SECTIONS 19.09.050 THROUGH 19.09.100, REQUIItEMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCE PLAN. The Eastlake III PFFP amendment for the Olympic Pointe project has been prepared according to the contents and details outlined in the Municipal Code. It has been submitted to and reviewed by the Director of Development Services who has determined that the proposed PFFP amendment complies with the provisions of Sections 19.050 through 19.09.100 and is forwarding the document with corresponding development plan to the Planning Commission for consideration. Public facilities needed to serve the project were identified and will be guaranteed byconditions ofapproval, EIR-05-02, payment of DIF fees at the building permit stage, and/or utilizing Community Facilities Districts to finance or maintain the public facilities. 6-18 THE PROPOSED PFFP AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, THE EASTLAKE III GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE AMENDED EASTLAKE III SPA PLAN. The Eastlake III General Development Plan and Eastlake III SPA Plan outline the necessary public facilities required to meet its land use and circulation objectives of the General Plan. The PFFP Amendment outlines detailed plans for the provision of those public facilities as they relate to the proposed Project. The PFFP identifies required TDIF fees which must be paid to help defray costs of facilities which will benefit the project. The estimated fees required by this project aze $ 2,715,920.20 for transportation facilities (TDIF plus traffic signal) and $ 4,618,986.00 for other applicable Facilities (exclusive of Pazk Acquisition and Development (PAD) fees. The fiscal revenues to the City associated with the Olympic Pointe project range from $54, 800 annually and rise to $309,000 at build-out. Fiscal expenditures would be initially $49,500 and rise to $279,300 at build-out. The net fiscal impact from developing the Olympic Pointe project is positive through-out the development and results in annual net surplus of $29,700 at build-out. THE PFFP AMENDMENT. ENSURES THAT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE CITY'S QUALTTY OF LIFE STANDARDS. As required by the City's Growth Management Ordinance, the PFFP Amendment analyzes the impact of the project on public facilities and services and identifies the required public facilities and services needed to serve the project to maintain consistency with the City's Quality of Life Threshold Standards. The PFFP describes in detail the cost, financing mechanisms and timing for constructing public facilities required to ensure that development occurs only when the necessary public facilities exist or are provided concurrent with the demands of the new development. Certain facility improvements have been ider:tified. These include the requirements for the constn:ction of a signal at the intersection of Olympic Parkway and the entrance to the project, other street improvements to Olympic Parkway and secondary access roadways for emergency access vehicles. In addtion, water conservation and air quality improvements and fire protection measures along with payment of required DIF fees will ensure the Project will maintain consistency with the City's Quality of Life Standards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Draft City Council Resolution and Ordinance approving the Project in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. 6-19 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THAT a copy of this Resolution and the draft City Council Resolution and Ordinance be transmitted to the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 10~' day of November, 2010, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Michael Spethman, Chairperson ATTEST: Diana Vargas, Secretary 6-20, MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. 276 Fourth Avenue November 10, 2010 Chula Vista, California CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL /MOTIONS TO EXCUSE: Members Present: Spethman, Liuag, Moctezuma, Vinson, Tripp, Felber Member Absent: Bringas MSC (Moctezuma/Felber) to excuse Cmr. Bringas. Motion carried. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS: Read into the record by Chair b:0aao P\4 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS CONSENT AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARINGS: No public input. None Public Hearing: PCM 10-07; Consideration of amendments to the Eastlake III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and associated Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use District Map for an 18.4 acre site at the southwest corner of Olympic Parkway and Wueste Road intersection. Background: Jeff Steichen reported that in June 2006 amendments to the General Plan and Eastlake III GDP and SPA Plan were approved to change the Visitor Commercial land use designation to Residential High to accommodate a 494 unit active seniors condominium project. Due to economic reasons, the applicant (Puelte) withdrew their application and sold the site to Windstar in January 2007. The Windstar project was approved as 494 residential units similar to the former Puelte project with the main difference being market rate rental units. Due to the economic downturn, the project was never constructed. In January 2010, the applicant for the currently requested 389 unit Olympic Pointe project entered into a purchase agreement with Windstar. Mr. Steichen presented the proposed Olympic Pointe project as described in the staff report. 6-21 Planning Commission Minutes - 2 - November 10, 2010 Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCM 10-07 recommending that the City Council: 1. Consider the Addendum to FEIR 05-02 2. Approve a resolution for the Eastlake III SPA Plan Amendment (PCM 10-07 and Ordinance for the amendment to the PC District Regulations based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the Council Resolution and Ordinance. Commission Comments: 6:1437 PM Cmr. Spethman stated this is a premier piece of real estate, with its proximity and views to the lake and mountains. He's also pleased that this will be a for-sale project instead of rental property as previously proposed. Cmr. Felber stated he supports the project, however, he's increasingly experiencing traffic congestion on Olympic Parkway with vehicles queuing to get onto I-805; he's concerned that this project will exacerbate those conditions. Cmr. Vinson stated he's pleased that the building height has been reduced by one story and that they will be for-sale products; he fully supports the project. Cmr. Tripp stated he supports the project and inquired if there's a provision stating that 1- 805 cannot compete or install additional improvements that might take away traffic from using the toll road SR-125. Gary Halbert responded that there are contractual obligations that preclude I-805 from adding general purpose lanes. He also indicated that there are improvements currently going on in that area close to I-805 that might be contributing to the congestion and back- up on Olympic Parkway. Cmr. Liuag stated this pristine piece of property is unlike any other in the City because of its proximity and views of the lake and mountains. The General Plan's land use designation as Visitor Commercial was a right one. Therefore, although he is pleased it will be a for-sale project, in principal and staying true to the original General Plan land use designation of Visitor Commercial, he cannot support the project. Cmr. Moctezuma stated SR-125 is a great road and could mitigate most traffic concerns this project could generate, but unfortunately many people, for whatever reason, most likely financial, don't use it. She indicated perhaps the developer would consider some kind of short-term subsidy to the home-owners as an incentive to use the toll road. Otherwise, she supports the project. 6:45:35 PM MSC (Vinson/Tripp)(5-1-0-1) that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCM 10-07 recommending that the City Council: 1) Consider the Addendum to FEIR 05-02 2) Approve a resolution for the Eastlake III SPA Plan Amendment (PCM 10-07 and Ordinance for the 'amendment to the PC District Regulations based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the Council .Resolution and Ordinance. Motion carried with Cmr. Liuag voting against the project. 6-22 Planning Commission Minutes - 3 - November 10, 2010 Director's Report: None. Commission Comments: None. Adjournment: To a regular Planning Commission meeting on December 8, 2010. Respectfully submitted Diana Vargas Secretary to the Planning Commission 6-23 ,- ~, ATTACHMENT 3 ADDEDUM TO FEIR-OS-02 6-24 _ ADDENDUM TO FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL llVLPACT REPORT EIR OS-02 PROJECT NAME: Olympic Pointe Project PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed project site is located in the east central portion of the Eastlake III SPA area on approximately 30.5 acres, (18.4-acre of graded pad azea). The project site is located immediately south of the intersection of Olympic Parkway and Wueste Road. Olympic Pazkway borders the project site on the west and Wueste Road borders the site on the east. PROJECT APPLICANT: Integral Partners, LLC for Eastlake Project Owner, LLC CASE NO: FEIR OS-02 DATE: November 2, 2010 I. BACKGROUND/SCOPE OF ANALYSIS The purpose of this Addendum is to address the proposed project, Olympic Pointe Resort, in replacement of the previously approved Eastlake III Senior Housing Project. As the lead agency for the project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code, Sec. 21000 et seq.), the City of Chula Vista prepazed and conducted an environmental analysis (Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Analysis FEIR OS-02) of the Eastlake III Senior Housing Project. Subsequently, the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (FEIR OS-02) for the Eastlake III Sensor Housing Project was certified ai June 2006. FEIR OS-02 addressed detailed amendments to the General Plan, Eastlake III General Development Plan (GDP) and Eastlake III Sectional Planning Area Plan (SPA) to allow for a land use change from visitor-serving commercial use to high density residential land use for the Senior Housing Project. The General Plan Amendment consisted of redesignating 18.4 acres to "Residential-High and the 1.2 acres of designated Open Space remained unchanged. In addition, the Eastlake III GDP was amended to redesignate 18.4 acres of CT-Commercial Tourist uses to RH-Residential High (18-27+ dwelling units/acre) and the 1.2 acres of designated Open Space remained unchanged. The Eastlake III SPA was also amended to eliminate the Commercial Tourist uses east of the (Olympic Training Center) OTC and instead provided potential high-density residential development. Components of the SPA included the proposed change in land use within the Planned Community District Regulations, Design Guidelines and Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP). FEIR 05-02 addressed the discretionary actions required to incorporate the changes of land use and project amendments within the Eastlake III SPA. 6-25 The environmental impacts of developing the subject site, 18.4-acres, have been previously analyzed in the prior EIR (FEIR OS-02) . Specifically, the physical impacts of developing the 18.4-acre site were evaluated in Eastlake III Senior Housing Project/Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (FEIR OS-02) and aze hereby incorporated by reference. The General Plan and General Development Plan (GDP) land use designation for this portion of the site is high density residential, and the SPA identifies this portion of the site for high-density residential development use. Accordingly, the General Plan, Eastlake III SPA including Plaaned Community District Regulations, Design Guidelines and Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) were modified to reflect the high-density residential uses. The first addendum to FEIR OS-02 was prepared in December, 2007 to allow the former 496 unit Windstaz Pointe Resort luxury apartment project which was approved but never constructed on the project site. The amendments to the Eastlake III SPA at that time, removed the Senior Housing project restrictions on how the project site could be developed and created a new RM-1 land use district to accommodate the former Windstaz project. The proposed project, Olympic Pointe Condominium Project, considered in this addendum is a further amendment to the adopted SPA and related development design standazds. These amendments will remove reference to the previously approved Windstaz project and replace it with Olympic Pointe residential condominium project. The applicant has requested the proposed the proposed project be reviewed for substantial conformance with the Pueletellomes/Senior Project for which an EIR was certificated, and which preceded the former Windstaz project. The proposed amendments to the SPA plan are based upon a site plan that includes 92 residential buildings of vazious sizes. The proposed project contains 3 product types:l) 2- story triplex units; 2) 3-story row homes and; 3) 3-story carriage row homes. The two- story triplex buildings would flank the project on the north, east and south, with the three- story row house products occurring on the interior and west side where visibility from surrounding azeas would not be a concern. Private streets within the project consist of a main entrance road, a loop road azound the perimeter of the site, and alleys, which provide access to the majority of the condominium units. Pazkmg for the units will be provided in gazages, with surface pazking for guests and visitors. A recreation center with-pool will be located in the southeast comer of the project. The entrance to the project will be off of Olympic Pazkway. An emergency access road would be graded in the southwestern corner of the property to allow additional emergency vehicle access to the project site, exactly as the emergency access road within the Senior Housing Project. No offsite pedestrian trail nor construction road are included as part of the Olympic Pointe project. The acreage for residential development would not increase and there would be a decrease in the currently allowed number of dwelling units for the site (494 dwelling units permitted) as seen below: 6-26 Approved Senior Housing Development 494 High density residential senior on 18.4-acres 1.2 acres Open S act e Proposed Olympic Pointe Development 389 High density residential condominium units on 18.4-acres 1.2 acres Open Space The proposed amendment and related documents to reflect this new development concept have been submitted and reviewed. Mitigation measures from the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRPs) associated with FEIR OS-02 are still valid and applicable to this project. The physical development of the 18.4 acres and unchanged 1.2 acres of open space has been previously addressed in the certified EIR. Thus, this Addendum focuses on the proposed Eastlake III SPA amendment and land use change for the 18.4-acre portion of the site from a senior housing project to a condominium development while maintaining the previously approved high-density residential use. Technical reports prepared for the FEIlZ OS-02 have been updated to reflect the new proposed project configuration and layout. The updated technical reports demonstrate and substantiate that the proposed SPA and Development Standazds me~ouslr identified result in any new significant impacts nor increase in severity of any p Y significant impacts. The environmental analysis presented in this document addresses the modification of the previously approved SPA plan. Because the modifications to the SPA plan, PFFP and associated Development Standards would not result in any increase in allowable units nor an adverse expansion of the limits of grading, the proposed SPA amendment is considered to be adequately covered under FEIR OS-02 and no further analysis is warranted. II. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The applicant has applied to amend the Eastlake III SPA, Development Standazds, De~gn f rence to theFOlympae Pointe 1Proje trefer~eeP oposedrehang sdinclude Jthe following: a) Anew project description and development plans b) Amend the Site Development plan to reflect a reduction in units from 496-389 c) Eastlake III SPA, Development Standazds and District Regulations to remove the Winstaz Pointe Resort apartment project and replace~e~th the0 l~pii Pointe condominium project. This includes amending g development standards to reflect parking standards for 4 bedroom units. Design standazds and exhibits would be amended to include design reference to the Olympic Pointe project. 6-27 d) Public Facilities Finance Plan Amendment to address the public facility needs associated with the proposed Olympic Pointe Condominium project. e) Affordable Housing Update fl Project-Specific Technical Studies and Analysis Updates Entitlements applied for: SPA Plan Amendments Amendments to the Eastlake III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan to remove references to the Windstaz project and add description of the proposed project. Amendments to the Eastlake III Planned Community District Regulations to remove references to the Windstaz project and add description of the proposed project. Amendments to the Eastlake III Design Guidelines to remove references to the Windstar project and add description of the proposed project. III. CEQA REQUIREMENTS Sections 15162 through 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines discuss a lead agency's responsibilities in handling new information that was not included in a project's certified environmental document. Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declazation adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepazed for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes aze proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declazation d~ze to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable 6-28 diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declazation was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declazation; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides that: A The lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions aze necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. g, An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the fuial EIR. C The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR prior to making a decision on the project. D. A brief explanation of the decision not to prepaze a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's required findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. ' This Addendum has been prepazed pursuant to the requirements of Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The proposed changes to the project do not constitute a substantial change to the previously approved project. The modifications proposed would not result in any environmental effects that were not considered in the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report FEIR OS-02, nor would the changes increase the severity of any of the impacts identified in this EIR. There has been no 6-29 significant material change in circumstances relative to the project, and no new information of substantial importance has become available after the prepazation of the Senior Housing Project EIR. The mitigation measures identified in FEIR OS-02 would be equally applicable to the revised project. Therefore, in accordance with Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepazed this addendum to Second Tier FEIR OS-02. IV. ANALYSIS Updates to technical studies previously prepazed for the Eastlake III Senior Housing Project, Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR OS-02) have been prepazed to address the proposed project, Olympic Pointe Condominium Project, and identify any potential impacts. An updated traffic study fully considers project specific and cumulative traffic impacts associated with the newly proposed project. A City approved traffic consultant has prepazed the Traffic Impact Study. Additional technical study updates to air quality, water quality, hydrology/drainage, sewer, geology, noise and firewater service studies have been prepared. Also, since Greenhouse Gas was not addressed in EIR OS-02 a GHG analysis has been prepazed. No new significant impacts were identified in the updated technical studies regazding the proposed project, Olympic Pointe Condominium Resort, beyond those identified in FEIR OS-02. Therefore, no new additional mitigation measures nor modifications to existing mitigation measures aze required. Aesthetics The proposed 389 unit condominium project contains 92 buildings, which is a substantially lazger number than the previous 13 buildings for the senior project. This lazge number of buildings allows for more variations and overall lower project height. The 40 triplex buildings proposed will be located primarily along the northern, eastern and southern perimeter of the site. The proposed height of these triplex buildings will be two stories/28 feet in height as opposed to the 3-story, 38-foot height of the perimeter buildings for the previous senior project. No new sources of light and glaze impacts have been identified. No additional significant impacts to aesthetics beyond those anticipated in the EIR OS-02 aze anticipated with this projPCt. The mitigation measures identified in the FEIR OS-02 have been determined to be equally applicable to the revised project. Air Quality An Air Quality Study, dated October 2010, was prepared by Dudek to access potential air quality impacts associated with the proposed project. The study analyzed short-term construction impacts, long term and cumulative impacts including .project emissions. The air quality study update analyzed the specific project changes as a result of the trip generation and volume trips increased by the proposed project relative to the EL Seniors project. However, no additional significant air quality impacts were identified in the Air Quality Study, and the mitigation measures identified in FEIR OS-02 have been 6-30 detemiuied to be equally applicable to the revised project and no new mitigation measures or modification to existing mitigation measures aze required. The Air Quality Study, included a discussion of the projects effect on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It included an analysis that evaluated the projected level of GHG emissions for the proposed project. The project's potential effect on global climate change was evaluated, and emission of greenhouse gases were estimated based on the use of construction equipment and vehicle trips associated with construction activities, as well as operation emissions once construction phases aze complete. With implementation of GHG reduction measures the proposed project would reduce GHG emissions by as much as 28% by the year 2020. The proposed project would therefore exceed the target of 20% below business as usual that has been established for the purposes of assessing operational GHG emissions of projects in the City of Chula vista, and this reduction would be consistent with the goals of AB 32. Furthermore, the proposed project would be consistent with Section 15.26.030 of the City's Muuticipal Code by employing energy efficient measures beyond that required by the Energy Code, resulting in a 20% reduction in emissions generated by in-home energy use. Additionally, the proposed project would reduce the overall use of potable water by 20%, consistent with the City's Municipal Code. Lastly, it should be noted that the project is high-density development, which ultimately helps in reducing vehicle miles traveled. The project would therefore have ales-than-significant impact on global climate change. Land use The proposed amendments would not conflict with the surrounding land uses nor intent of the General Plan. The residential nature of the proposed use would be consistent with the adopted high=density residential designation for the project site and compatible with the surrounding residential and open space land uses of the EastLzke azea. The proposed amendment to the SPA Plan does not result in an increase in residential units, and the limits of grading remain the same as that originally addressed in the approved SPA plan and Senior Housing Project. No additional significant impacts to land use above those ant;ipated in FEIR OS-02 aze anticipated with the proposed project. No significant impacts were identified regazding land use, planning and zoning and, therefore, no mitigation measures were required with respect to the Eastlake III Senior Housing Project FEIR OS-02 concerning land use. No mitigation measures aze recommended for the proposed project, Olympic Pointe Project. Transportation, Circulation and Access An updated traffic impact report was prepazed by traffic consultant, Linscott, Law and Greenspan (LLG), dated September 22, 2010. The analysis concluded that the proposed project, Olympic Pointe, would not cause any impacts to the surrounding street network and intersections requiring mitigation beyond that identified within FEIR OS-02. The 6-31 traffic analysis for the proposed project analyzed changes in trip distribution within the project site, traffic volumes, LOS levels, projections, regional systems, cumulative projects and traffic related impacts upon the General Plan Update Circulation Element and circulation system and roadways. As identified within the traffic analysis, the proposed project results in approximately 2,334 average daily trips (ADT) per SANDAG trip generation figures. This mazks an increase of 358 ADTs from the previously approved Senior Housing Project. However, the prior installation and operation of the signal light at Wueste Road and Olympic Pazkway, the opening in Fall 2007 of the SR 125, and required compliance with the mitigation measures identified within the Eastlake III Senior Housing Project Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report FEIR OS-02, will offset any additional traffic volume associated with the project. No significant traffic impacts were identified in the traffic analysis, and the existing mitigation measures contained in EIR OS-02 have been determined to be equally applicable to the proposed project. Drainage and Water Quality Fuscoe Engineering prepared a drainage study addendum, dated May 2010, to evaluate any changes in drainage patterns and runoff rates created by the proposed project. The updated study indicates that the proposed changes to the site will not result in any previously unidentified significant hydrologic impacts nor identified any new hydrologic impacts. The mitigation measures contained ui FEIR OS-02, for the approved Senior Housing Project, would be equally applicable to the proposed project, Olympic Pointe. A preliminary Water Quality Technical Report for the Olympic Pointe project, dated May, 2010, was. prepared by Fuscoe Engineering to evaluate the change to the storm water quality as a result of the proposed project. The study concluded that the proposed changes to the site will not result in any previously unidentified significant or new water quality impacts. The mitigation measures contained in FEIR OS-02, for the approved Senior Housing Project, would still be applicable to the proposed project. Noise An updated Acuustical Assessment Report, dated May 24, 2010, was prepazed by Dudek to evaluate potential noise impacts created by the proposed Olympic Pointe project to surrounding azeas and noise impacts to the proposed project azea. The proposed project contains both fewer units and a different project design than the previous senior housing project. A five-foot high noise wall along the top of slope facing Olympic Pazkway has been provided on the site plan to ensure that traffic noise levels onto the project site will be within the City's maximum 65 CNEL exterior noise level criterion. The acoustical report does not identify any significant noise impacts and the mitigation measures contained within FEIR OS-02 and FEIR 01-01 have been determined to be equally applicable to the proposed project. Public Services, Systems and Facilities 6-32 According to the On-Site Water Study prepazed by PBSJ Company, dated Apri12, 2010, the anticipated Maximum Day Demands (MDD) is 422,745 gpd and Average Day Demands (ADD) is 140,915 gpd. The Senior Housing Project estimated maximum day demand was 296,400 gpd. Although, there is an increase in demand and service units, adequate water supply will be provided to meet peak hour demand, minimum 40 psi pressure and continue to serve long term facilities. The existing 12" water main located on Olympic Pazkway will continue to provide service to the project site, similaz to the Senior Housing project, according to the Otay Lakes Water District Will Serve Letter for the Olympic Pointe Project dated January 6, 2010. The project will have no significant impacts to the existing regional water system and not require any additional off-site improvements to facilitate the proposed project. Fuscoe Engineering prepared an On-Site Sewer Study for Olympic Pointe, date April, 2010 and PBSJ prepared anOff--Site Sewer Capacity Analysis Study dated Apri12, 2010 to address potential sewer system impacts. Based upon the sewer flow calculations, capacity information for the project design and connection to the existing system no additional service systems and facility impacts were identified. The analysis results are consistent with the projected peak design flows indicated in the approved Final Eastlake Pensinsula Off-Site Sewer Capacity Analysis Study, prepared by PBS&J, dated November 8, 2005 and other technical studies contained within the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, FEIR OS-02. The updated technical studies confirm that there will not be any significant impacts or changes in the anticipated wastewater generation or potable water demand from what was previously considered in FEIR OS-02. Based upon the updated on-site and off-site sewer capacity analyses and the Otay Water District will-serve correspondence, no significant demands to public services and facilities, including water and sewer, aze anticipated. No significant impacts beyond those previously identified in FEIR OS-02 aze anticipated, and the mitigation measures contained within FEIR OS-02 will be equally applicable to the revised project. Geological Hazards An updated Geotechnical Investigation, dated September 30, 2010, was prepazed by Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. to evaluate the project design and potential impacts. The report concluded that no geological significant conditions aze appazent that would pra:vent development of the project site. No fiuther impacts were identified, therefore, no new mitigation measures required. Therefore, no new impacts with regazd to geological hazazds aze anticipated and the mitigation measures identified in EIR OS-02 will be applicable to the revised project. V. CONCLUSION Pursuant to Section 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, and based upon the above discussion and substantial evidence in the record supporting said discussion, I hereby fmd that the proposed project will result in only minor technical changes or additions which aze necessary to make the Environmental Impact Reports adequate under CEQA. 6-33 tephen wer, A.LC. . Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Project Site Plan(s) 2. Executive Summary to EIR OS-02 References: City of Chula Vista Environtental Review Procedures City of Chula Vista General Plan Update Eastlake III SPA Plan and Final Map, Final Endtronmental Impact Report EIR (EIR 01-01) Eastlake III Senior Housing Project Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report EIR (EIR OS 02), certified June 2006 Eastlake III General Development Plan (GDP), adopted July 17, 2001 Eastlake III Sectional Planning Area Plan (SPA), adopted July 17, 2001 City of Chula Vista Housing Element City of Chula Vista, Affordable Housing Pro~am Technical Smdies/Information for Olymnic Pointe Project Acoustical Assessment Report prepazed by Dudek, dated May 24, 2010 Air Quality Impact Analysis prepazed by Dudek, dated June, 2010 Traffic Impact Analysis, prepazed by LLG Engineers, dated September 22, 2010 Geotechnical Investigafion, prepared by Alta California Geotechnical, dated September 3Q 2010 Off-Site Sewer Capacity Analysis, prepazed by PBSJ, dated April, 2 2010 On-Site Sewer Analysis prepazed by PBSJ, dated Apri12010 Preliminary Drainage Study, prepazed by Fuscoe Engineering, dated May 2010 Preliminary Water Quality Study, prepazed by Fuscoe Engineering, dated May, 2010 On-Site Fire Service Study, prepazed by PBSJ, dated July 12, 2010 On-Site Water Study, prepazed by PBSJ, dated Apri12, 2010 OWD Comment Letter dated January 6, 2010 Fire Protection Plan, prepazed by Dudek and Associates, dated July 2010 6-34 ,y ~: .: ,` ~ Q / fi' s/~ ./ /~ ' 0~' W ~~ ~'., ,,, ~~~ ~'':1 ~~ ~~\~ i l\ ~/ U O y% ~:.~ \ __ ~- ~i f -r. }r. ~ Y~l FUSCOE ~~ ;,~_~: SIIE PLAN OLYMPIC POINTE CMY of GNY W14 CefleMa .«., i 2 ! 8 SECTION '1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ~.~ INTRODUCTION This Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared by the City of Chula Vista (City} as lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Public Resources Code 21000 et. seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et. seq.). T1us E1R has been prepared to evaluate the environmental effects of the proposed Eastlake III Senior Housing Project. 1,2 PURPOSE AND NEED ' As discussed in the proposed Eastlake III SPA Amendment, the objectives for the SPA Plan are to: Assure a high quality of development, consistent with City and Community goals and objectives, the Chula Vista General Plan and Eastlake III General Development Plan. Create an economically viable plan that can be realistically implemented within currant ~ and projected economic conditions. f Provide for orderly planning and long-range development of the project to ensure 't community compatibility. ^ Establish the necessary framework for an' identified financing mechanisms to facilitate adequate community facilities, such as transportation, water, flood control, sewage disposal, schools and pazks and provide adequate assurance that approved development 1 will provide the necessary infrastructure, when needed, to serve the future residents of ~ Eastlake III. ^ Preserve open space and natural amenities. ^ Establish a planning and development framework which will allow diverse land uses to exist in harmony within the community '~ . i J Eastlake 111 Senior Housing EtR - ATTACHMENT 2 June 2006 6-36 .c i> ~ i l 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION 1.0 EXECUT/VE SUMMARY j 1 As depicted on Figures 1-1, 1-2 and 1-3, the project is located within the eastern portion of the Eastlake Community of the City of Chula Vista.. The project area is situated adjacent to the Olympic Training Center and directly west of the Lower Otay Reservoir. 1.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project involves amendments to the General Plan, Eastlake III General Development Plan (GDP) and Eastlake III SPA Plan to allow for the proposed land use change from visitor-serving commercial to high density residential. The General Plan Amendment would consist of redesignating 18.4 acres to "Residential-High." The 1.2 acres of designated Open Space around the site would remain unchanged. The Eastlake III GDP would also be amended to redesignate 1'8.4 acres of "CT-Commercial-Tourist" uses to "H-Residential High (18-27+ dwelling units per acre). The remainingl.2 acre "Open Space" designation would remain unchanged. Finally, the Eastlake III SPA would also be amended, specifically to eliminate the Commercial Tourist uses previously environed east of the OTC and instead provide for high density residential development. Components of the SPA, including the Planned Community District Regulations, Design Guidelines and Public Facilities Finance Plan (PEEP) would all be modified to reflect this proposed change in land use. The SPA also includes a specific Affordable Housing Program, Air Quahty Improvement Plan and Water Conservation Plan for the proposed seniors project. The 494-unit senior housing project would consist of 13 courtyazd style buildings, each four stories tall over a pazking structure .(see Figure 1-4).. The project..would also include fitness facilities, recreational rooms, two view corridor/pazks and a pedestrian paseo aoound the outer perimeter. An on- and off-site emergency access would also be constructed. This emergency access would be located in the southwestern portion of the site, and would allow emergency vehicles a second access to the site via the Olympic Training Center pazldng lot. This senior housing community would be gated, and housing units would be "for sale." The densities and unit numbers proposed would result in approximately 1,235 new residents. The project architecture will consist of southern Spanish designs, and be arranged to mirror Mediterranean hillside towns. Buildings will include deeply recessed balconies, attached roofs, canopies, trellises and courtyazds to provide visual breaks in the building fagade. The rotation of each building was an intentional effort to break-up the appeazance of building mass. The single Eastlake III Senior Housing ElR aeaa-oi ,~ I I } ~'~ ,.I t 1 1 1-2 ,lone 2ooe 6-37 I 6-38 FIGURE Eastlake III Senior Housing Project - Environmental Impact Report 1-1 . Regional Map -~ i _. , N ~ r ®. o iQ a C m rG v to •~ a ~ ~ 'V C d E 0 .~ C W U N 'o O. C ~y 7 O O .C N d Y tO J Y h W i M ~O LL ~--~ a o CC d O] +-~ U Q [O ~^ d ~ E ~ - v ~ o +-~ J c m E v c ~ o ..~ '- O ~ ~. w 0- ,-. U N ~O ~.. a C .y O O_ ~C d of ..]C [O J Y N (O W O ~~ c0 APRIL 2006 ~~-'~ FII CURE I Eastlake III Senior Housing Project • tnvironmentai impact nepul ~ 1 _4 Proposed Site Development PIan~Grading Plan 7.0 EXECUTNE SUMMARY level recreational club will be located at the eastem edge of the property. The recreational club will serve as a focal point for the project. The site has been graded in accordance with approved grading permits. However, portions of the site will need to be raised four to five feet to create a gradual elevation change on the eastern portion of the site. This would result in a "stepped" effect away from the Lower Otay Reservoir and would maximize the views of all residential units- T~s ata es will need to be ~exOcOavated yards of fill. Simultaneously, the underground pazldng g g approximately 10 feet to establish a 12-foot underground gazage space. The excavation will generate approximately 173,500 cubic yards of excess soil. The cut and fill requirements of the site will balance, thereby eliminating the need to export or import fill material. Finished first floor elevations will range from 560.5 to 578 feet. A total of 963 spaces will be provided on the project site, meeting the City's pazking requirements for the intended land use. Discretionary actions for the Eastlake III Senior Housing project include: General Plan Amendment Eastlake III General Development Plan (GDP) Ameudment Eastlake III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Amendment Tentative Map for the Eastlake ]II Senior Housing Project. The following additional permits/approvals may be required of other Responsible Agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board: CWA 401 Water Quality Certification (potential), Storm Water Discharge Pemut and approval of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Optional Facilities The proposed buildings will be constructed in several phases. In order to avoid potential conflicts between project residents and construction activities, the applicant is proposing a temporary, off-site construction access road will be constructed south of the existing graded pad. The proposed road would be approximately 20 feet wide and approximately 600 feet long and would extend from Wueste Road to the edge of the project boundary. The roadway area will encompass approximately 15,000 square feet (0.50 acre) and will not exceed a 12 percent slope. asas-o~ Eastlake III Senior Housing EIR 1-7 June 2006 6 _ 4 2 s+ I 1 9.0 ExeCUTNE SUMMARY The graded roadway will be covered with stabilized decomposed granite to allow for drainage. Once construction has been completed, the road would be removed, regraded and revegetated to . preexisting slope conditions. This temporary construction access road is not required for ~ construction of the project and is therefore identified in this EIR as an "optional" project feature. An off-site trail connecting the proposed project with the Olympic Training Center to the west, is also being analyzed m tins EIIL This offsite trail would connect 'the proposed project (via the southwest corner) with the OTC trail system. This trail would be approximately 5 feet in width i and entail dedication of a 30 foot easement across OTC property. The trail would be constructed with a pervious surface, such as decomposed granite, to allow for unimpeded drainage. This trail is being considered by the applicant as an "op$onal" facility and is analyzed in this EIR. Impact chazacterizations aze broken out for each optional facility in the impact sections of the EIR 1.5 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION Initial scoping of the project concluded that, the proposed project would not significantly affect the following environmental categories: agricultural resources, cultural resources, hazazds/risk of upset, mineral resources and housing and population. Based on the initial scoping, the City determined that an EIIZ was required to more fully investigate project effects to landform alteration and aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, geology and soils, water quality and hydrology, land use and planning, noise, traffic and transportation, public services and utilities I and paleontological resources. l The following table, Table 1-1, provides a summary of environmental impacts and mitigation measures related to the proposed project: '1.6 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES In developing alternatives to be addressed in this EIR, consideration was given regazding their ability to: (1) meet the basic objectives of the project described in Section 3.0; and (2) eliminate significant environmental impacts as identified in Section S.0 of this EIR. Based on the above parameters, three alternatives were identified. The Alternatives discussion in this EIR addresses - the no development alternative, an alternative that would result in the continued development of the site under the Commercial-Tourist land use designation and reduced density alternative (single family residential similaz to surrounding development). _ Eastlake III Senior Housing EIR June 2006 6-43 4643-01 _ 1-a ~._-_, _ __ _ ._. __. _ r, _.. • .~ 1.0 EXECUTIVE SL. ARY TABLE 1-1 Senior Housing Project -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation The protect would Introduce a new source of and glare which would be potentially significant. +* m roan rtv ,-v„ .,,y.,,,,....... „....,..~--._ ....~_-- -- visual quality were Identified as a result of landform alteration. This Impact must therefore be carried forward. This project would have an Incremental contribution to the cumulative impact Identified in FSEIR #01-01, 5.2-a Prior. to approval of the Tentative Parcel map, 'the Less than applicant shall submit a lighting plan as a part of the Design Review application for the project. The Ilghting plan shall demonstrate that protect lighting is shielded from surrounding properties and that only the minimum. amdunt of lighting required for safety purposes Is provided to avoid adverse affects on surrounding areas. In general, Ilghting fixtures shall be shielded downward and away from adjacent residential land uses, MSCP Preserve areas and Lower Olay Reservoir. The mitigation for project impacts would be applicable for cumulative impacts to landform alteration and visual quality associated with the proposed project. Impacts associated with.. slope Instability would 5.3•a Prior to approval of grading plans, the following Less roan slgnnlcanr. potentially be significant. conditions are required to be on the plans. The proposed project's grading plans shall demonstrate compliance with remediation recommendations In the June 10, 2005 Geolechnlcal Investigallon for the project prepared by Geotechnics Incorporated, Including but not limited te: a) :Upper soil layers shall be removed to a depth of 'two to three feet during Iniliafconstruclion periods and replaced with competent com acted fill. 4843-01 Easaake III Senior Housln EIR 1-9 June 2006 7.0 Execunve Sun Rv TABLE 1-1 Senior Housing Project -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation ~ ~ ~ b) Replacement of native soils with compacted fill shall be required to eliminate the potential for liquefaction. ' c) Any areas subjected to new fill or structural loads shall be prepared with compacted till. Erosion during consUucllon, although short-term in 5.3-b Prior' to approval of grading plans, a Storm Water llution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared P Less than significant. nature, could be slgnlficant,wlthout erosion control o for the protect that Identifies specific Besl Management measures. Practices (BMPs) to minimize erosion and control sedimenlallon. A copy of the SWPPP will be kept onsile and Issued to all supervisory staff working on the project. Project acllvlties resulling In excess erosion shall be halted and BMPs adjusted to ensure off-site sedlmenlallon Is avoided. t truclures will be located over underground parking. See Mitigation Measure 5.3-a Less than signlUcanl. Potentially slgnlgcanl Impacts to ioundallons and sUuctures could -occur If expensive soils are encountered. Potential Impacts resulting from other geological See Mitigation Measure 5.3-a Less than significant. hazards such as seismic activity would be slgnlUcant. Water quality Impacts resulling from construction 5.4-a Prior to approval of a grading permit the Applicant shall Less than significant. and operational acllvlties would 6e significant, obtain coverage under the Stale Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002, Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activity. In accordance with Bald Permit, a Stdrm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Monitoring Program Plan shall be developed and im lamented concurrent with the commencement of 4eaa-or Eastlake III Senior Housln EIR , 1-10 June 200fi ~__-. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SU:; ',RY TABLE 1-I Senior housing Project -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation grading actlvilies. The SWPPP shall specify both construction and post-construction structural and non- structural pollution prevention measures. The SWPPP shall also address operalien and maintenance of post- constructlon pollution prevention measures, including shdrt-term and long-term tunding sources and the party or parties that will be 'responsible for the implenientallen of Bald measures, A complete end accurate Nollce-ot-Intent (N01) shall be filed with the SWRCB. A copy of the ackhowledgement from the SWRCB that a NOI has been received far tfils project shall be filed with the City of Chula Vlsla when received. Further, a copy of the completed NOI from the SWRCB showing the Permit Number for this project sftall be filed with the Cily of Chula Vista when received. 5.4-b Prior to approval of grading and construction plans, the Applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer compliance with all of the applicable provisions of the Municipal Codg and the Clty of Chula Vista SUSMP. The Applicant shall Incorporate into the project planning and design an effective combination of site design, source control, and treatment control post- construction BMPs and provide all necessary studies and reports demonstrating compliance with the applicable regulations and standards. Post- construction BMPs shall be identified and implemented as fo abate Identified pollutants of concern to the maximum extent practicable standard described In the Clly of Chula Vista SUSMP. 4643-01 Eeslleke III Senior Housin EIR 1-11 Juno 2006 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUi:::.i1RY TABLE 1-1 Senior Housing ProJeCt -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation ~ ~ 5.4-c Prior to Issuance of a grading permit for any area of the project Qncluding offsile areas) draining towards the Lower Otay Reservoir, the applicant shall: ' 1) Obtain the approval of the Clly of Chula Vista and all other applicable agencies for any proposed structural drainage runoff detention andlor diversion facilities within the Olay Lakes Watershed. 2) Obtain the approval of the Clty of Chula Vista and 'all other applicable agencies of all operational and maintenance. agreements associated with any proposed structural drainage runoff detention andlor diversion facilities within the Olay Lakes Watershed. 5.4-d Prior to approval of the grading plan, the Applicant shall verify that surface drainage' has been designed to collect and discharge runoff Into natural stream channels or drainage structures. In order to avoid Indirect Impaots to the Lower Olay Reservoir, fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides shall not be applied to the ' manbfaclured slopes along the northern property of the property. Potable water shall be used for Irrigation: All drainage ystems shall be designed In accordance with the City's Engineering-Standards and to the Cily of San Diego's Source Water Protection Guidelines for New Developments (2004). 5.4-e The' applicant shall design surface and subsurface drainage to preclude ponding outside of designated areas, as well as flow down slopes or over disturbed areas. 4643-01 Eeslleke III Senior Housln EIR 1-12 June 2006 I_._, I_.---~ ._._., ~ ~____~ ,.~_. ._--~ TABLE 1-1 Senior Housing Project -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Prior to the approval or a graemg penm;, p,c nyyu..~,,, shall verify that runoff diversion facilities (e.g., inlet pipes and brow ditches) have been be used to preclude runoff (low down graded slopes, Drainage terraces for sldpes in excess of 40 feet in vertical height shall only be 'required for stabilization purposes. Slopes In excess of 40 feet In height may not require terraces provided That slope-specific analysis demonstrates that such measures are not needed In order to achieve the intent of the Clly's grading ordinance. Energy- dissipating structures (e.g.; detention ponds, r(prap, or drop structures) shall be used al storm drain outlets, drainage crossings, andlor downstream of all culverts, pipe outlets, and brow ditches to reduce velocity and prevent erosion. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance In grading plans prior to Issuance of a grading permit; Pridr to issuance of the grading permit for any site In the drainage area, the Applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed detention facilities would reduce 50-year post-development peak flows to equal to or less than pre:development conditions. The proposed onslte detention facilities shall be designed to ensure Ihat there Is no Increase In downstream (I.e., south of Olympic Parkway) velocities In Sall Creek. For areas with the greatest potential for groundwater seepage, Impacts could be reduced to a less than slgniflcant level through installation of subsurface drains as determined by the Soils Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. Implementation of these measures Is the responsibility of the applicant. Prior to the start of grading activities, the brow ditch Inrated at the base of the slope between the Lower 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUh. 2Y 1-13 June 2008 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUM... Y TABU 1-I Senior Housing Project -Summary of 1!;nvironmental Impacts and Mitigation ~ , Otay Reservoir and the project site shall be inspected and sediment that could cause runoff to breach the ditch. shall be removed. The brow ditch shall be inspected after each 0.5 Inch. 5,4-g Prior to approval of the final map, andlor building permits (as determined by the City Engineer), the Applicant shall submit a maintenance program for the proposed post-corislructlon BMPs and all private drainage facilities within common development areas to the satisfaction of the Cily Engineer. The maintenance program shall Include, but not be limited to: (1) a manual describing the maintenance activities of said facilities, (2) an estimate of the cost of such maintenance activities, and (3) a funding mechanism rn for financing the maintenance program. In addition, the ~ Developer shall enter into a Maintenance Agreement ' m with the Clty to ensure the maintenance and operation of said facilities. 5.4-h Regular maintenance of the Greenbelt and Community lialls.shall be the reaponsihillly of the Eastlake III HOA, depending on designation, to minimize the potential for erosibn into Lower Otay Reservoir. Prior fo the approval of the TM, the applicant shall submit a Landscape Responsibility map to identify funding for all areas within the project. 5.4-I The following urban runoff control measures shall be shown as notes bn the Tentative Map. These measures shall be made a condition of the Tentative Map and shall be implemented on the final grading and Improvement. plans. Implemenlallon of these measures Is-the responsibility of the applicant. 4643-ni Eastlake III Senior Housin EIR 1.74 June 2006 7.V CXEGU11Vt JUMMAKY TABLI•;1-1 Senior Housing Project -Summary of T+;nvironmental Impacts and Mitigation ~ ~ 1) Per the Clean Water Act, BMPs to control pollutants and sediment from entering storm water runoff are required for the protect area. Source control BMPs via landscaping of all slopes and street rights-of-way shall be provided to prevent erosion. Any other applicable source control or :BMPs which may be implemented on a city-wide basis In conJunclion with the City's Municipal NPDES permit shall be Incorporated into .the specific plan. The size, capacity, and location df any olher'pollullon control devices which would be used to capture urban pollutants onsite will be determined as part of the protect-specific drainage studies prior to the approval of future subdivisldn maps. °' 2) 'The City's Department of Planning and Building cis shall verify that the mitigation measures are ° conditions for the approval of the tentative map :and that they are implemented on the grading plans for the project. 5:4-J Prior. to the Issuance of any .building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building that hazardous materials shall not be stored along the eastern edge of the site, All hazardous maledals shall be stored within secondary containment capable of holding 15g percent of the largest container. Hazardous materials shall be stored in a secure area That can be locked during non- working hours. This will help prevent any unintended hazardous material spills which could Impact quality of runoff water from the site. Eastlake III Sanlor Hausln EIR 4643-01 June 2006 1 15 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE 1-1 Senior Housing Project -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation ~ , ~ 5.4-k Silt fence or a similar approved sediment barrier shall ba in'stalled along the eastern perimeter of the project site, or as directed by a qualified erosion conUol • specialist, to prevent sediment'transport Into the Lowor Olay Reservoir. Spoil stockpiles shall be stored at least 20 feet from the perimeter of the site. A qualified monitor shall inspect all erosion and sediment control devices onslle prior to anticipated storm events, during extelided storm events, and after each storm event to ensure Thal the structures are functioning properly. Inspection logs shall be kept onsile and suhmitted ib the City upon request The level of service at the protect driveway and 5.5-a Prior to approval of the grading plan, the applicant shall Less than significant. Olympic Parkway will degrade to F as a result of the t enter Into an agreement to design, construct, and secure a Tully actuated traffic signal Including ; protect from vehicles entering and exiting the protec which would be a signiflcenl direct Impact of the Interconnect wiring, mast arms, signal heads and proposed protect. associated equipment, underground Improvements, standards and luminaires ;at the Olympic ParkwaylProject Driveway intersection. The design. of the signal shall be to the satisfaction of the Clly Engineer and conform to Clty standards, The applicant shalGprovlde the fallowing Intersection geometry: Westbound: One left-turn lane (with 100 feet of storage) and two through lanes Southbound: None Norfllbound: One left-turn lane and one right-turn lane (With a storage length of 75 feel in each) Eastbound: One shared throughlright lane and one .through lane. 4643-01 Eastlake III Senior Housin EIR i6 1 - June 2006 ~ I ~. _. L~~ L._._.. i~_._ .~ -- .-..-__ .__- ~.`.-.._ .- .- ~~ _..~ ._ - - 1Y TABLE 1-1 Senior Housing Project -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation A signal shall be installed at the project driveway and two outbound (northbound) lanes, one left-turn and one rlghf-turn lane, and two Inbound (southbound) lanes be provided. 5-b Prior to approval of building permits, the median 5 . opening on Olympic Parkway further shall 6e relocated west from its current location to accommodate the proposed protect driveway. 5-c Prior to approval of buliding permits, a "No U Turn" sign 5 . for eastbound traffic on Olympic Parkway al the Olympic ParkwaylWuesle Road Intersection shall be Installed. The potential con0lct between constuclon-related 5.5-d Prior to approval of the grading permit for the Less than signifcant temporary construction access road, a Traffic Control raffle and vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle traffic on sal red pre all b e B l n Wueste Road and the adjacent trail would he a act of the optional construction t Im t di he f or road Wueste Roadlaccess inee E n ll"b h p rec significan e a Intersection. The Traffic Control Plan s access road. Implemented for the duration of the use of the temporary access road. The TraSic Control Plan shall address methods to avoid conflicts between vehicles on Wueste Roadlpedestrlans and bicyclists on the ball adjacent to Wueste Rcad and consWction vehicles entering and exiling the site. ant unmitigable Impacts to i ifi Specific mitigation measures were Identified to reduce potential Significant (cumulative). c gn In FSEIR #Ot-Ot, s Irefflc end circulation patterns were determined for significant Impacts, however cumulative Impacts would be 2010, 2015, 2020 and build-out conditions, 2005 unmlllgable. , Impacts to freeway operations were also Identified as significant. This Impact from FSEIR #Ot-01 must therefore be carded forward. Because the proposed project Is part of the' huildout of the overall EaslLake III communlt , a sl niflcant cumulative unmlll able 4643-01 Eastlake III Senior Housin EIR 1 _» June 200fi - 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUh 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUM. .RY TABLE 1-1 Senior Housing P roject -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation ~ , traffc Impact was identified for bulidout of the community, and the proposed protect would result in an Incremental contfibullon to the traffic from bulidout of the community, therefore a slgnificanl cumulative unmlfi algid Uafflc im act would occur. During consfrucllon, ROC emissions would exceed 5.6-a To the' maximum extent feasible, the proJecl developer Less than signlUcant. the dally standard, This .Impact Is considered shall use zero-Volatile Orgenlc Compounds (VOC)- content architectural coatings during proJecl slgnlUcant. construcllonlapplicalion of paints and other architectural coalings to reduce ozone precursors, If zero-VOC paint cannot be utilized, the developer shall avoid to the maximum extent feasible, application of . architectural coatings during the peak smog season: July, August, and September. ' rn Although conslrucllon-related emissions would not 5.6•b c Prior to approval of any grading permit, the following Less than signlUcant. . surpass PMIa thresholds, the protect will generate measures shall be placed as notes on all grading plans nuisance dust and fne particulate matter. and Implemented during grading to reduce dust and exhaust emissions (PMTS) and ozone precursors (ROC and NDX): a) Minimize simultaneous operation of multiple construction equipment units b) Use Icwpotlutant-emitting equipment c) Use calalytlc reduction for gasoline-powered equipment d) Use Injecllon timing retard for diesel-powered equipment e) LVater the grading areas a minimum of twice daily to minimize fugllive dust f) Stabilize graded areas as quickly as possible to minimize fugitive dust 4643-01 Eastlake III Senior Housln EIR 1-16 June 2006 - ~- ~- ~ ~ ~- ~ ` -~ ~~ _ _i `~'- V ~~ -- 1.0 EXECUTIVE SU, CRY TABLE 1-I Senior Hous ing Project -Summary of Environmental Impa cts and Mitigation ~ ~ ~ g) ;Apply chemical stabilizer or pave the last 100 feet of Internal travel path within the construction site prier to public road entry h) Install wheel washers adjacent to a paved apron prior to vehicle entry on public roads I) :Remove any visible track-out Into traveled public streets wilhln 30 minutes of occurrence J) 'Wet wash the construction access polnl at the end of the workday If any vehicle travel on unpaved surfaces has occurred k) .Provide sufficieht perimeter erosion control to prevent washout of slily material onto public roads I) Cover haul trucks or malnlain at least 12 Inches of freeboard to reduce blow-off during hauling m) :Suspend all Boll disturbance and travel on unpaved surfaces if winds exceed 25 mph n) Covert water onslle slockplles of excavated 'material; and o) 'Enforce a 20 mile-per-hour speed limit on unpaved surfaces. In FSEIR #01-01, significant unmiligable Impacts to None Significant (cumulative). air quallly were documented as a result of nonconformance with regional air quallly plans and overall project (entire Eastlake III development) Impacts on regional air quallly. This Impact Identlfled In FSEIR #Ot-01 must iherefore be carried forward. While the proposed protect would generate less than half of the projected Uaffic for the- site underlhe exlslln land use desl nation, It would still contribute 4643-01 Eastlake III Senior Housln EIR 1-19 June 2006 7.0 EXECUTIVE SUro. , ' 2Y TABLE I-I Senior Housing Project -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation ~ , ~ Incrementally to overall cumulative vehicular emissions generated by buildout of the area. Potential exposure to Interior noise levels greater 5.7-a Prior to issuance of hullding permits, where exterior Less than significant. than the City's allowable Ilmlt of 45 dB CNEL would noise levels on Internal roadways exceed 60 CNEL, be considered significant. additional measures shall be required to attenuate Inledor noise to the City's 45 CNEL standard, such.as inoperable or double-paned windows. For those units that raqulre the windows to be closed to achieve the interior noise standard, forced-air circulation or air conditioning shall be provided by the applicant. 'An acoustical analysis shall be conducted for Buildings t, 2 and 13 that are adJacent to Olympic Parkway concurrent with the submittal of construction drawings rn and shall be approved by the Director of Planning an I ~ Building and the Environmental Review Coordinator prior to approval of building permits. The acoustcal analy5ls shall demonstrate that interior noise levels due to exterior noise sources would be below the 45 CNEL standard. Potential exposure of future residents to exterior 5.7-b Five.fcot high noise barriers around the per(meler of Less than significant. noise levels (from polio and baiwny areas) greater ld the individual private patio and balconies at some of s in a t w li than the City's allowable Ilmit of 65 dB CNEL wou fo~ ale would be re ulred to roli Parkwa io OI m g ) p be considered signlflcanL structed Is. Sound walls may be con noise impac Irani of any masonry material, or material such as tempered glass or Plexiglas with a surface density of at least three pounds per square toot. The sound wall should have~no openings or cracks. Ta61e 5.7-7, Dwelling Units Requidng Sound Walls around Patios or Balconies Included In Secllon 5.7 Noise, of the EIR , 4643-oi Eastlake III Senior Housln EIR 1-20 June 20D8 _ . _~-.. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUh.....1RY TABLE i-I Senior Housing Project -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation ~ ~ provides a summary of required walls that would achieve 65 CNEL al the exterior patioslbalconles. The proposed SPA Plan would result In an 5.8-a Prio[ to approval the Final Map, the applicant shall Less than significant. th e tncremenlal Increase In public facl118es if Ihey are not demonstrate compliance with recycling policies In provided commensurate with demand. The City's General Plan and Municipal Code. Demonstration of compliance with these policies shall Incremental contribution of solid waste, and demand on water and sewer servlca, parks, fire, police, include construction of onsite recycling facili8es, emergency services, libraries and schools would be recycling program establishment, etc. slgnl8cant. 5.8-b Prior to approval of the Final Map, a minimum of 3.86 acres of parkland will be established within the project area. in accordance with the Cily of Chul9 Vista Municipal Code Section 17.10.40. Any shortfall In parkland acreage dedication shall result in payment of the park acqulsilion component of the Park Acquisition and Development (PAD Fee). Given tha lack of available acreage Thal could be acquired to serve the development, the acqulsilion component of the PAD Fee will be waived and a payment of $4.1 million (including the development portion of the fee and land acgUlsltion fee adjusted over dedication at Eastlake Vistas neighborhood park) will be made which can be uliliied to fund construction of park and public facili8es serving the EaslLake Cbmmunlly. Any excess funds that remain once these facilities are complete can be utilized on other park or public facilities serving the Eastern Territories of Chula Vista. The Developer will pay the development component of the PAD Fee as regWlred by the City (EaslLake III SPA Plan, February 20, 2006 and personal communlca8on with Jack Griffin, City of Chula Vista April 3, 2006). 5.8-c Prior to Issuance of building permits, the applicant shall be re wired to a the Public Facilities Develo ment 4643-a1 Eastlake III Senior Hoesin EIR i-21 June 2006 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMI ' Y TABLE 1-I Senior Housing Project -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Impact Fees (PFDIF) at the rate In effect at the time building permits are issued as determined by the Cily Englneer, to offset Impacts on City fire, police, emergency services and libraries. 5.8-d Prior'to approval of the Tentative Map, the applicant shall submit plans showing fue Clow and fue hydrant locations to the Cily of Chula Vista Fire Prevention Division for review and approval. rn I J Safely Issues for recrea8onal troll users directly exposed to crossing construcllon Uatfic due to the optional temporary construc8on. access road are considered significant. 5.8-e Prior to approval of building permits, the applicant shall pay all required school mitigation fees at the rate In effect ai the time building permits are Issued or enter Into an agreement to help finance the needed facilities and services for the Chula Vista Elementary School District and Sweetwater Union Hlgh School District. 5.8-f Water and sewer facility Improvements shall be financed or installed on-and off.slte In accordance with the fees and phasing in the approved Public Facilities Financing Plan for the SPA Plan. 5.8-g The City of Chula Vista shall continue to monitor Police and Flre Department responses to emergency calls and report the results to the Growth Management Oversight Committee on an annual basis. 5,8-h Prior to approval of the grading permit for the optional construction access road, a traffic control plan shall be prepared to the satlsfactlon of the Clty Englneer that addresses pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular safely during construcllon at the Intersecllon of Wueste Road and the option construcllon access road. 4843-ni Eastlake III Senior Housln EIR 1.22 June 2006 _. - ~_.. .~__.1 .___. -._..- .--.+' __i __J---' ... .. r- .__. _... ._._.__._ ..~.--. .~-~ ._~- 7.0 ExecurrvE Sun- :v TABLE 1-1 Senior Dou sing Project -Summary of Environmental Impa cts and Mitigation ~ ~ Potential Indirect Impacts to lands Intended for 5.9•a In accordance with the adjacency guidelines contained Less than significant. conservation adjacent to the project site (associated In the Subarea Plan, mitigation to minimize Indirect with Otay Valley Regional Park) are considered Impacts to sensitive wildlife, species, sensitive plant significant communities and , functions of the .Preserve as envisioned in the City's Subarea Plan are as follovis: Drainage and Toxic Substances 'Pollution seduction measures, such as ail and water separators, shall be Installed In all drainage systems at the properly line to eliminate introduction of contaminants Into the Preserve. 'Such measures shall be Indicated on grading plans and approved by the Clty prior to issuance of any land development permit, Including clearing 1 and grubbing and grading -permits. The ' 'Installation of these pollution reduction measures shall be verified by the Clty during project construction. Additional best management practices far reduction to Impacts to drainages Include: slopes and channels will 6e protected from erosion; storm drain stenciling and slgnage will be employed, and control of post-development peak storm water runoff discharge rates and velocities will be 'enacted to maintain or reduce downstream erosion and to protect stream habitat. These measures shall be further outlined in the protect SWPPP. Eastlake III Senior Housin EIR ~ ~ 4e43-o1 1.23 June 2009 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUN; fY TABLE 1-l Senior Housing Project -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation rn 1 icD Lighting .. tight shielding la protect the Preserve from spill- over during construction activities shall be required. In addition, lighting proposed for the residential development shall be directed .away And shielded from the Preserve. Law sodium lighting-shall also ba utilized. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a lighting plan shall be submitted to the City's Environmental Review Coordinator for feview and approval. The lighting plAn shall illustrate the location of the proposed lighting standards and type of shielding measures. Low- pressure sodium lighting shall be used if feasible and shall he subject to the approval of the City's Environmental Review Coordinator and Cily Engineer. Noise • Construction activities shall Include noise reduction measures or be conducted outside the breeding season of sensitive bird species. In particular, grading restrictions shall be Implemented during the breeding season (February 15 Through August 15) of the California gnatcatcher, and if construction is proposed during the breeding season,. noise levels. shall not exceed 60 dB(A) Leq within 500 feet of an active gnatcatcher nest. .Noise impacts adjacent to the preserve shall be min(mized through installallon of berms or walls adjacent to the residential areas and any other use that may InGoduce noises that could Impactor 4643-01 Eastlake III Senior Housln EIR 1-24 June 2008 _- I .. -_ _ _ _ _..: ~_.a `-'"` "-` `~' `- ~ ~ ^J ti __._ 1.0 Execunve Sun: rr TABLE 1-1 Senior Hous ing Project -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation ~ ~ ~ Invaslves • Native vegetation shall be used for revegetating 'the temporary access road, and shall be incorporated Into the landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. Such measures shall be Indicated on grading plans and approved by the City prior to 'Issuance of any land development permit, Including clearing and grubbing and grading permits. Prior to Issuance of a grading permit, .landscape plans shell be submitted to the City for review and approval. Potential direct Impacts to narrow endemic plant 5.9-b Prior to issuance of any land development permit, Less than significant. species that may occur wllhln the optional off-site Including clearing and grubbing and grading permits, trail end optional consUuclion access road are for the optional trail and temporary construction access considered slgnlgcant, road, the applicant shall retain a City-approved ist to conduct a Narrow Endemic species survey. biolo g Once surveys have been completed, an Impact analysts shall be prepared to determine the Impacts to any narrow endemic species found in those areas and Include mitigation measures in accordance with Section 5.2.3 of the City's Subarea Plan. Finally, the impact analysis shall be submitted to the City's Environmental Review Coordinator for review and approval prior to Initialing any construction activities. If a narrow 'endemic plant population Is discovered, Impacis shall be limited to 20% of the population wllhln the protect area, and appropriate mitigation shall be provided to meet the requirements of biological equivalency in Section 5.2.3.6 of the Subarea Plan. Tha Cily shall prepare findings of equivalency to,authorize "Take" of , the ortion of the loot o ulatlon. 4843-01 Eesllake III Senlar Housln EIR 1-25 June 2006 7.0 EXECUTIVE SUMP '' 'Y TABLE 1-I Senior Housing Project -Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation ~ ~ ~ ~ If; alter the comprehensive consideration of avoidance and minimization measures, Impacts exceed 20% of the covered Narrow Endemic Species population within the project area, the Cily must make a determination of biologically superior preservation consistent with Section 5.2.3.7 of the Subarea Plan. This determination shall be based on appropriate mitigation sufficient to meet the requirements established for biologically superior preservation Identified In Secllon 5.2.3.7 of the Subarea Plan. The Cily shall process the appropriate findings In accordance with Section 5.2.3.3 of the Subarea Plan. If such Endings cannot be made for either or both of these optional protect features; the feature(s) That are not consistent with the policies related to narrow endemic species shall not be Q, I Implemented. file protect could potentially be Inconsistent with the See Mitigation Measures 5,9-a and 5.9-b. Less than slgnigcant. HLIT Ordinance which would constitute a significant ' Impact. Impacts to previously undisturbed soils as a result of 5.10-a Prior to Issuance of a grading permit, the applicant Less than significant. column borings would be a significant Impact. shall confirm in writing to the City of Chula Vista that a qualified paleontologist has been retained to carry out the mitigation described herein. A qualified paleonlologlst Is defined as an Individual with a M.S. or Ph. D. In paleontology or geology who is familiar with paleontological procedures and techniques.. A paleontological monitor may be retained to perform the on-site monitoring In place of the qualified paleonlologlst. Apaleontological monitor Is defined as ao individual who has experience fn the collection and salvage of fossil materials and who is working under the su ervislon of a ualified aleontolo ist. 4643-61 Eastlake III Senior Housin EIR 1-26 June 2606 L._.. ...._.~ .~.- .~...~. u.._-- L_. ..---- ......~ _ 1 I -~ ~ ._ ~ ~ ... r-, 7.0 EXECUTIVE SUt.: ,RY TABLE 1-1 Senior Housing Project- Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation ~ ~ 5.10-b The qualified paleontologist or paleontological monitor shalt attend preconstruclion meeting to consult with the grading and excavation contractors. The paleontologist's duties shall Include monitoring of grading, salvaging, preparation of collected materials for :storage at a scientific Institution that houses paleontological collections, and preparation of a monitoring results report. For each step below, the paleontologist should present results to the City of Chula Vista for review. These duties are defined as follows; • The paleontologist or paleontological monitor shall be on-site during the original cutting of previously undisturbed sediments of the Otay Formation to I Inspect cuts for fossils contained. therein. The Sweetwater Formation should be monitored on an as-needed basis as determined 6y the paleentologist or paleontological monllor. The frequency of Inspections would depend upon the rate of excavation, the materials excavated, and the abundance of fossils. The paleontologist would work with the contractor to determine the monitoring locations and amount of time necessary to ensure adequate monitoring of the pro~ebl site. • In the event that fossils are encountered, the paleontologist (or paleontological monllor) shall have the authority to divert or temporarily halt construction activities In the area of discovery to allow recovery of fossil remains In a timely ~fashlon. Because of the potential for recovery of .small fossil remains, It may be necessary to setup a screen-washln o erallon on-site. 4843-01 Eastlake Ill Sanlor Housin EIR 1-27 June 2008 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUN 'Y TABL); 1-1 Senior Housing Project -Summary of l+;nvironmental Impacts and Mitigation Fossil remains shall be cleaned, sorted, repalreo, cataloged, and then stored in a local scientific Institution that houses paleontological collections, such as the-San Diego Natural HlstoryMuseum. A monitoring results report with appropriate graphics summarizing the results (even if negative), analyses, and conclusions of the above program shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Chula Vista within 90 days following the termination of the paleontological monitoring program. rn rn w 4643-01 Easllaka III Senior Housln EIR~ - 1-2a June 2008 ... 7.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY r i 1 No Project/No Development Alternative The No Development Alternative assumes that the project site would not be developed and the entire project site would remain undeveloped. Existing Land Use Designation (Commercial -Tourist) Alternative The existing land use designation for the project site is for Commercial-Tourist uses. The Existing Land Use Designation Alternative would result in the continued development of the site for Commercial-Tourist uses. No amendments to the General Plan or Eastlake III GDP would be necessary. Since the FSEIR #Ol-Ol addressed the development of the project site for commercial-tourist uses; the impact characterization is a summary of conclusions from the FSE1R #O1-Ol. In cases where FSEIR #Ol-Ol did not differentiate the impacts related to the specific project site and instead referred to impacts from development of the lazger Woods and Vistas project, an independent analysis was provided- Reduced Density Alternative (single family residential [Similar to surrounding development]) The Reduced Density Alternative would consist of single family residential uses that, aze typical of the surrounding environment. In addition, the amount of units would be less, approximately 56 for the entire site. This was estimated by assuming that these single family residenfial units would be similaz in size and style and be located on lots similar in size to surrounding developments. Table 1-2, Comparison ofProjecf Alternatives, gives a summary of all Project alternatives. Eastlake III Senior Housing ElR June 2006 6-64 4643-01 1-29 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMk.' .Y TABLE 1-2 COMPARISON OT PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Planning and' Lend Use Slgniflcant and miligaled to below No impact. No impact lo, the project site. Simllar to Similar to the proposed project. , Zoning slgnlflcance. proposed project with regard to construction access road and trail. Lendform Alteration and Slgniflcant and miligaled to below No Impact. Similar to the proposed project. Similar to the proposed project. Aesthetics slgnlflcance. Agricultural Resources No Impact. No impact. No Impact. No Impact. Biological Resources Significant and mitigated to below No impact Similar to the proposed project. Simllar to the proposed project. slgnlflcance. ~Itural Resources No impact. No impact. Similar to the proposed project. Similar to the proposed project. N Geology and Soils Significant and mitigated to below No Impact. Similar to the proposed project. Simllar to the proposed project. slgnlflcance. Paleontological Significant and miligaled to below . No impact. Similar to the proposed project. Simllar to the proposed proJecl. Resources slgnlflcance. Water Quality and Slgniflcant and mitigated to below ' No impact. Simllar to the proposed project. Simllar to the proposed proJecl. Hydrology slgnlflcance. Transportation Significant and mitigated to below No impact, More impacts than proposed project. Similar Less Impact than proposed project. , Clrculatlon and Access slgnificance, design measures could be incorporated as the i icance. proposed proJecl to mitigate below slgnif Alr Quality Slgniflcant and unmitigated. No impact. More impacts than proposed project. Less Impact than proposed project. Noise Slgnit'icant and mitigated to below No impact. .More Impacts than proposed project, Less Impact than proposed proJecl. slgnlflcance. 4643-01 Eastlake III Senior Housln EIR - h30 June 2006 1.O EXECUTIVE SUi:LaARY f Q~ 4643-61 Eastlake III Senlor Housln EIR 1-31 June 2006 TABLE 1-2 COMPARISON Or PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ATTACHMENT 4 OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM s-s~ ~~ y ~~Sr~ P l a h n i n g & B u i l d i n g ~D e p a r t m e n t City OF Planning Division ~ Development Processing C}iULAVISfA Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any adlon upon matters that will require discretionary action by [he Council, Planning Commission and all other official bodies of the Clty, a statement of disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City of Chula Vista election must be filed. The following information must be disclosed; 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is fhe subject of the application or [he contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor; subcontractor, material supplier. ~ ~aok(g.lxc Prar a- nr . (.tC P~- "~ r,J~ ncla~-u-r ~or~ ,~ae/t. ~ ~ LC 1 1 3~..a Pa..f~--s 1~1i ~t.c p 2. If any person` identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all Individuals with ' a $2000 investment in the business {corporationlpartnership) entity. 3. If any person` identified pursuant tc (1) above is a non-profit organization or trust, list the names of any person serving as director oT the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. L 4. Please identify every person, Including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. ~ .. ~Qcr~1~ E.-~,{zsH-r.-4 ~1.._ a 1. 1 a IFT ct~S B. c x FuJ e S '~nla cf4[/ r e--, G_,~rtP (ac~.Q_ ' c ~/ Y Gy ~ 5. Has any person' associated with this contract had any financial dealings with an official" of the City of Chula Ysta as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months. Yes_ No~_ If Yes, hriefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official"' may have in this contracC 6. Have you made a contribution of more than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a curent member of the Chula Vista City Council? No~ Yes _ If yes, which Council member? 276 Fourth Avenue i Chula Vista ~ California ~ 91910 ~ 16141 691-5101 6-68 City Of Chula Vista Disclosure Statement- Page 2 7. Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivalent value} to an offiaal" of the City of Chula Vista in the past Twelve (t2 months? (This includes being a source of income, money tc retire a legal debt, gift, loan, etc.) Yes No If Yes, which official" and what was the nature-of item provided? Date: y-~z-/O ~.intp Wa.,,~ Print or type name of Contractor/Applicant ~iJ 7.8Ce2~• ~Ft'-t1~°~h~~S X X V.L~ L L c ' Person is defined as: any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, district, or other -- political subdivision, -or any other group or combination ailing as a unit Official includes, but is not limited to: Mayor, Council member, Planning Commissioner, Member of a hoard, commission, or committee of the City, employee, or staff members. c 276 Faur[h Avenue ~ Chula Vista ~ Californ is ~ 97970 ( 1679) 691.5707 s'6.9 ATTACHMENT 5 EASTLAKE III SPA PLAN AMENDMENT (BINDER ATTACHED) s-~o ATTACHMENT 6 PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN AMENDMENT (ATTACHED) 6-71 ATTACHMENT 7 MEETING NOTES FROM DRB MEETING OF DECEMBER 20, 2010 s-~2 MEETING NOTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DECEMBER 20, 2010 D~ AFT 4:08:11 PM ROLL CALL: Calvo, Nava, Martinez, Jenks, Balvaneda ABSENT: Balvaneda 4:16:46 PM INTRODUCTORY REMARKS: Read unto the record by Chair Calvo 4:36:05 PM 4:16:47 PM APPROVAL OF MINUTES: None 4:33:07 PM 4:34:11 PM PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 4:34:22 PM 4:37:08 PM Chair Calvo shared that she spoke with Jim Bartell, Integral Communities, prior to the meeting and discussed the process that the Olympic Pointe project has already been through and that the project will be discussed again with the consent of the applicant, and per the recommendation of the City Council. Some frustration was expressed that the project will be reviewed again by the Design Review Board. 4:38:01 PM 4:38:02 PM STAFF COMMENTS: Steve Power explained that the project did go through the consolidated review process. Because the new the process was adopted during the time the project went forward, it first went through Preliminary Design Review, and once the consolidated process was approved, consistent with that process, the Chair of the Design Review (as the designated person to review consolidated projects), reviewed the project and provided comments. Those comments were given to staff and addressed. The project went to City Council on December 14, 2010. The City Council did not reject the item but moved to continue the item to January 11, 2011 with the recommendation that staff work with the applicant if there were any design issues and, if applicant chose to go back to the Design Review Board, they would have that opportunity. The applicant is now going before the Design Review Board requesting any informal input/comments. At the Design Review Board meeting of January 10, staff will be asking the Design Review Board to make a recommendation on the project which would then go forward to the City Council on January 11, 2011. 4:40:10 PM Chair Calvo asked for clarification in regards to the staff report (noted under Background, Item #1) requested staff to meet with the applicant on the Design Review process, addressing design review concerns; Chair Calvo asked what were the concerns of the City Council. Steve Power explained that if there are concerns to the project, staff will work with the applicant to resolve those concerns before going before the Design Review Board and City Council. 4:34:24 PM PROJECT REVIEW: 4:34:35 PM 1. DRC-10-08 Design Review for the construction of a new 389 unit condominium project known as Olympic Pointe to be located on an 18.4 site at the southwest corner of Wueste Road and Olympic Parkway. 4:43:17 PM 6-73 4:43:'17 PM Jeff Steichen. Associate Planner, gave a powerpoint pir>entation on the project. On March 1, 2010, this project went before the Design F2eview Board as Preliminary Review, it was subsequently reviewed by Chair Calvo as part of the consolidated process. The presentation this evening will be a little bit mure in depth and formal which will include colored elevations. Additional request to view other-elevations are available for review upon request. Member Calvo called on those that submitted speaker slips to speak ahaut the project. The following are a list of those that spoken in favor of the project: 4:47:40 PM Scott Vinson, President, Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce, read the letter which was sent to the members of the City Council and Design Review Board members, earlier in the day (copy of letter attached). Mr. Vinson expressed that on behalf on the 1,000+ businesses of Chula Vista, that they request that the Design Review Board recommend approval of the project. 4:51:13 PM Mike Spethman, Chairman of the Chula Vista Planning Commission. Mr. Spethman spoke about the architectural elements, design, and materials of the project and how the Planning Commission analyzed and finally approved the project. Mr. Spethman explained that it was the consensus and the conclusion of the Planning Commission when looking at this particular project (and knowing there were two previously approved projects) and due to the uniqueness of the site, that this project was the best based upon it's sensitivity to the site including the architectural elevations, reduction in height, increased parking (more than what the city requires), increased open space, and a better setback of the site in general. As a result, the Planning Commission did not have any issues with the project. The former Chairman, of the Design Review Board, David Bringas (who is a practicing architect), is currently on the Planning Commission and he did not have any problems with project. Mr. Spethman said he would be available to the DRB for any questions regarding how the Planning Commission came to it's conclusion regarding this project. 4:53:53 PM Kevin O'Neil - 621 Del Mar Ave, Chula Vista, was on the Design Review Commission for 8 years and on the Planning Commission for 8 years, and is currently the Chairman of the Development Services Oversight Committee. Mr. O'Neil expressed his concern that the applicant is spending a lot of money on this project, the applicant followed the process that was set by the city. Mr. O'Neil expressed that he is a strong supporter of the Design Review process and the Planning process, and would like to request that the Design Review Board approve the project. 4:56:57 PM 4:56:57 PM Bob Chase, noted that he is available for (engineering) questions. 4:57:08 PM Kirk McKinnley, noted that he is available for (architectural) questions. 4:57:13 PM John Patterson, noted that he is available for questions. 4:57:17 PM Sean Dyre, Project Manager, 5333 Mission Center Road, Ste 390, San Diego 92108, asked if Jeff Steichen could pull up the Fact Sheet on the powerpoint presentation. 6-74 ,. Mr. Dyre spoke about the project and explained that the number of units were reduced, parking units were increased, size of units were increased, changed from rental to for sale, average price of the units will be $300,000. Mr. Dyre hopes to break ground on the project next summer, and expressed his belief that this product is of the highest quality. 5:02:55 PM Jim Bartell, 5333 Mission Center Road, San Diego, 92108, spoke about the community outreach on the project, which included talking to neighbors, a community workshop was held at the Olympic Training Center, those that were in attendance liked the presentation and the project. No one has showed up in opposition at the City Council meeting last week or at the Planning Commission meeting in November, based on community support, would appreciate continued support. 5:04:19 PM Lane Waite, representing applicant -expressed that as the applicant, he felt that they had explained everything at the previous hearing (Design Review Board) and after receiving comments from staff, changes were made on the project which made the project better. Some of the larger buildings were split up, some buildings were tweleve-plexes to start with and broke them up into four-plexes, the largest unit is a six- plex unit, mandering walkways were put in within those. Comment have been received, and with the experience of the team and with previous experience with the city, felt that they came in with what they thought the city wanted. Mr. Waite mentioned that they felt comfortable with the project, and that the project continued to move forward with the Design Review process, and the Planning Commission, and noted that no significant comments were made from either board. The architectural process continued to move forward, plans are completely done and are ready to be submitted, and the final map is in second plan check. Mr. Waite mentioned that he feels that the process is significantly streamlined and felt that everyone had a chance to comment on the project, he suggested that written comments from the Board will be helpful next time. Mr. Waite also expressed that Intregal Communities are financing other builders in the city, home building and any kind of construction field, as builders, they are out on a limb and have lost money in the process, time is money. Mr. Waite said he would be available for additional questions. There were no speakers in opposition of the project. 5:08:14 PM COMMENTS FROM BOARD: Chair Calvo asked if the members had any comments: 5:08:37 PM Member Martinez -had no additional comments on the project and expressed that he liked what he saw the first time it was presented. 5:08:49 PM Member Jenks -mentioned that the project is in a great location and a good project. Steve Power asked if the members if there were specific aspects of the project that they would like to comment about. Member Jenks -had no comments 6-75 Member Nava -had no comments. 5:08:59 PM Chair Calvo, asked what the specific cuncerns were of the City Council 5:09:11 PM David Miller, City Attorney- explained that there were no specific concerns other than the that the site was special and that a better project or a different project was anticipated, however the member of the Council would like to hear if the Design Review Board had any comments on the project. 5:09:50 PM Chair Calvo -commented that as commissioner Spethman mentioned, the project was reviewed twice, the Board saw the project at the Preliminary Review, comments were given at that time (which the applicant addressed), the project was approved by the Planning Commission. Chair Calvo mentioned that she reviewed the project again, she had no additional comments, and stated that it is a good project. Steve Power asked if Chair Calvo thought that the project was consistent with the applicable Design Guidelines, Chair Calvo said yes and has no reason to change her original recommendation, she has no comment because the applicant has already addressed her concerns. 5:11:03 PM Steve Power polled the Board will be available on January 10 and asked if they could let him know ASAP. 5:11:27 PM Chair Calvo mentioned that the Municipal Code states that the applicant has already gone through the process. 5:11:43 PM David Miller -explained that the applicant has followed the process stated in the Municipal Code, and this meeting, based on a suggestion from Council, was something that the applicant chose to do in order to provide more information to the Council. It was not something they were obligated to do. At this time in order to give Council that information, though not required, staff would like to bring it back to the Design Review Board for a formal recommendation. This meeting was more for comments as to whether or not the project, meet the standards that the Design Review Board have for a project of this type. Chair Calvo -asked why the Design Review Board couldn't vote on the project tonight. David Miller explained that the notice that went out was for discussion only. 5:12:52 PM Steve Power -stated that due to the quick turn around for a meeting, the notice was sent out as a review, a formal recommendation will have a 10 day hearing notice. If there were any concerns tonight, the applicant could address those and be prepared when it went to the Design Review for a formal recommendation. 5:13:13 PM Chair Calvo,said she would be available Jan 10 for the next meeting. 5:13:26 PM Member Martinez -mentioned that he didn't understand why the Board has to review it again which has already been approved. The applicant is willing to spend money and bring jobs to the city, which is what the city needs. 6-76 5:14:08 PM Steve Power-mentioned that it was the applicant's choice to be here tonight, the project will not be slowed down, that the project is scheduled to go to council on January 11, 2011. The applicant would feel more comfortable having the Design Review Board's opinion before going to City Council the next night. 5:14:27 PM David Miller -mentioned that in order to meet the Brown Act requirement for an open meeting, this meeting was noticed but in terms of making an actual decision and a recommendation, staff was not able to make the 10 day noticing period. In order to follow the state code and make sure that the notification went out to neighbors for an actual decision making process. The applicant has the choice, but is not an obligation of the applicant, to come back for the formal recommendation but the applicant prefers to do that. 5:15:33 PM Members Nava said he would check his schedule for January 10. Member Jenks and Member Martinez said they would be available. The applicant asked if the Board could get an informal vote tonight. Steve Power explained that the board cannot vote due to the noticing requirements, they can only comment. 5:16:32 PM Meeting adjourned 5:16 p.m. to a Special Meeting of January 10, 2011 6-77 ;;on~c:rr olEr'irrcn: !'residzr;i Scut! V°a is~51; 233 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 TeL:619-420-6603Fax:619-420-1269 E-marl: .., _.. ~ . ~. Website: http://www.chulavistachamber.org December 20, 2010 Prcshlant Ord ioh lili;: Dear Honorable Mayor Cox, Council Members and Design and Review Commissioners, Jiee I'rrvl,l,:rtl; Last Tuesday al our City Council meeting there was a split vote to approve the Olympic `° t ' , '" Pointe condominium project, which resulted in the item being continued to the Design ~r.:ol i I ~ ~~_~"~~'~ Review Committee and then to the Cit Counci] meetin on Januat 11. ~~` ' ` ~•"`"~~` As a part of our efforts to attract iuvestors to Chula Vista, Our Chamber of Commerce J:!v No;?~:: participated and initiated the streamline development process to save time and money to ~, ~ _~ ~,, •,,,,t,.,~ assist our city in the ability re-start development and move our city forward. This in turn will allow the City of Chula Vista to save jobs and secure revenues badly needed for onr city to ~~`~~ ~~~~'` maintain our quality publicsetvices. The developer relied on this process and ur fact exceeded it by presentutg the project to the ~ ~ ~ -~'~"' full Design Review Conunittee 6 months ago in additiou to having it reviewed by the !4 .,,,., ~ ;,, ,__. _, Chairperson of the DRC prior to months of staff review and Plamring Commission approval in November. 1frLad Cln: ~~n o, iilia~. Hall Today the project will be umtecessnrily in front of our Design and Review Commission. It ~'`" "I "'~" ~~~~"~'~ is time for our city to seed a clear message that the City of Chula Vista is open to business t. '"~' ~~'' \ ~ ~"-~ ` and welcome well planned new and redevelopment projects. These unnecessary delays not laiuin Z)iv. ,,,.. ~, i,, ,_ .. , only cost jobs and tax revenue, but also send a message to the inveshnent community that Chula Vista is not ready to welcome new investment. C'inudi;i ` uiCnzuN;; This parcel was previously approved by Planning Commission and our City Council for a ,,,,I, ~ much higher density 494 apartments than is being proposed by Integral Partners which is 389 condos. Iu addition, it will bring over $12 million dollars in project fees to the City. i'fcar'fnrms t ° i "' "~'~"~'" We strongly support this project for streamline approval. ;:!91 On behalf our Board of Directors we respectfully request approval on this project. , Jsa Gim~,r Sincerely, Lisa Cohen CEO Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce 6-~8 G;h~S. RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONSIDERING THE ADDENDUM TO FEIR- OS-02; APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE III SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN, PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCE PLAN (PFFP) AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS FOR 18.4 ACRES AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OLYMPIC PARKWAY AND WUESTE ROAD I. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject of this Resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached to and incorporated into this Resolution, and commonly known as Olympic Pointe, and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 18.4 acres ("Project Site"); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department on April 12, 2010 by Integral Partners XXIV, LLC for Eastlake Project Owner, LLC ("Applicant"), requesting amendments to the Eastlake III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, the Planned Community District Regulations and associated regulatory documents, including Design Guidelines, PFFP, Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP) and Water Conservation Plan (WCP) for the Project Site ("Project); and C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various entitlements and agreements, including: 1) a General Plan Amendment, General Development Plan and SPA Plan and associated Design Guidelines, PFFP, WCP and AQIP and Comprehensive Affordable Housing Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 2002-220 on July 17, 2001; and amended on June 20, 2006 for the Eastlake III Seniors Project; and 2) Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use Districts Map approved by City Council Ordinance No. 2839 on July 24, 2001, and amended by City Council Ordinance No. 2963 on May 18, 2004; further amended on June 20, 2006 for the Eastlake III Seniors Project; and further amended in April, 2008 for the Windstar Point Resort project; and 3) Tentative Subdivision Map approved by City Council Resolution 2006-191 on June 20, 2006; and D. Environmental Determination WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project 6-79 Resolution No. Page 2 was covered in previously adopted Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, Eastlake III Senior Housing Project, FEIR OS-02. The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of subsequent documents have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director has prepared an addendum to this document, Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, Eastlake III Senior Housing Project, FEIR 05- 02. E. Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on November 10, 2010 and voted 5-1-0-1 to forward a recommendation to the City Council on the Project; and, WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the Project held on November 10, 2010 and the minutes and resolution resulting therefrom, are incorporated into the record of this proceedings; and, F. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project application and notices of said hearings, together with its purposes given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on December 14, 2010 in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 4:00 p.m. to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to heaz public testimony with regard to the same. WHEREAS, the City Council heard public testimony, closed the hearing and continued the item to the City Council meeting of January 11, 2011 to allow the applicant to work with staff to discuss any design concerns and at the discretion of the applicant to take the Project to the Design Review Boazd fox review; and 6-SO Resolution No. Page 3 WHEREAS, at the request of the applicant, the Design Review Board reviewed the project on December 20, 2010 and held a public hearing on the Project on January 10, 2011; and WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on January 11, 2011, in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 4:00 p.m. to receive the recommendations of the Design Review Board, and to heaz public testimony with regard to the same. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista that it finds, determines, and resolves as follows: II. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council finds that, in the exercise of their independent review and judgment, the addendum to FEIR-OS-02 in the form presented, has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and adopts Addendum to FEIR-OS-02 . III. SPA FINDINGS/ APPROVAL A. THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, AS AMENDED, IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE EASTLAKE III GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN. The proposed amendments to the Eastlake III SPA Plan reflect land uses that are consistent with the Eastlake III General Development Plan and the City of Chula Vista General Plan. The residential nature of the proposed use would be consistent with the adopted high-density residential and open space land uses of the Eastlake area. B. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREAS. The requested amendments to the Eastlake III SPA Plan includes a PFFP that outlines the required infrastructure to serve the Project, the timing of installation and the financing mechanisms to promote the orderly sequentialized development of the Project. The Project is one of the last azeas of Eastlake III to be developed. 6-81 Resolution No. Page 4 C. THE EASTLAKE III SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. The proposed land use text and statistical amendments to the SPA Plan, and development standards will not adversely affect the circulation system and overall land use pattern as previously envisioned in the Eastlake III General Development Plan. An addendum to FEIR-OS-02 has been prepared and any impacts associated with the proposed amendments have been previously addressed by FEIR-OS-02. Thus, the requested amendments to the SPA Plan will not adversely affect the adjacent land uses, residential enjoyment, circulation or environmental quality of the surrounding uses. D. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL AND RESEARCH USES, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN AREA, LOCATION, AND OVERALL DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE SUCH AS TO CREATE A RESEARCH OR INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED DESIRABILITY AND STABILITY; AND, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL MEET PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THIS TITLE. The proposed project is not industrial or research land use. E. THE STREETS AND THOROUGHFARES ARE SUITABLE AND ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC THEREON. The potential impacts to traffic and circulation have been thoroughly analyzed based upon the proposed project resulting in specific requirements that must be complied with at the time of development within the project area. This includes payment of any required in-lieu fees to pay fair share of cumulative impacts and the construction of a traffic signal at the project entrance and Olympic Parkway. F. ANY PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CAN BE JUSTIFIED ECONOMICALLY AT THE LOCATION(S) PROPOSED AND WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE COMMERCIAL FACILITIES OF THE TYPES NEEDED AT SUCH PROPOSED LOCATION(S). The proposed project is not a commercial land use. 6-82 Resolution No. Page 5 G. THE AREA SURROUNDING SAID DEVELOPMENT CAN BE PLANNED AND ZONED IN COORDINATION AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPATIBILITY WITH SAID DEVELOPMENT. The proposed amendments are consistent with the previously approved plans and regulations applicable to surrounding sites and therefore the proposed amendments can be planned and zoned in coordination and substantial compatibility with said development. IV. APPROVAL OF SPA AMENDMENTS Based on the findings above, the City Council approves the Eastlake III SPA Plan as amended in the document entitled Eastlake Ill SPA Plan", dated October 22, 21010 which document accompanies the staff report as Attachment 5 ("Attachment 5") subject to the conditions set forth below: 1. The Project shall comply with all mitigation measures specified in FEIR-OS-02, to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. 2. The Applicant shall install all public facilities in accordance with the East]ake III SPA Plan Public Facilities Financing Plan Amendment or as required to meet the Growth Management Threshold standards adopted by the City. The City Engineer may modify the sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision. 3. The Applicant shall implement the Federal and State mandated conservation measures outlined in the Addendum to the WCP for Eastlake III SPA Plan. 4. Prior to approval of building permits for each phase of the Project, the Applicant shall demonstrate that air quality control measures outlined in the Eastlake III SPA Plan Addendum to the AQIP pertaining to the design, construction and operational phases of the project have been incorporated in the project design. 5. Prior to the 30`h day after the Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall prepare a clean copy of the SPA Plan document by deleting all strike out/ underlines and shading. Where the document contains both an existing and proposed exhibit, the previous existing exhibit shall be removed and substituted. In addition, the strike-out underlined text, document format, maps and statistical changes within the Eastlake III SPA, PC District Regulations, Design Guidelines, WCP Addendum and AQIP Addendum for the Olympic Pointe project shall be incorporated into the final document and approved by the Director of Development Services for printing. 6-83 Resolution No. Page 6 6. Prior to the 30`h day after the Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall submit to the Development Services Department 10 copies and a CD of the approved amendment to the Eastlake III SPA Plan, Eastlake III Planned Community (PC District Regulations), Design Guidelines, Addendum to the AQIP, Addendum to the WCP and Eastlake III SPA PFFP. V. PFFP FINDINGS/APPROVAL A. THE PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCE PLAN AMENDMENT COMPLIES WITH SECTIONS 19.09.050 THROUGH 19.09.100, REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCE PLAN. The amendment to the Eastlake III SPA Plan PFFP has been prepared according to the contents and details outlined in the Municipal Code. It has been submitted to and reviewed by the Director of Development Services. Public facilities needed to serve the project were identified and will be guaranteed by conditions of approval, payment of DIF fees at the building permit stage, and/or utilizing Community Facilities Districts to finance or maintain the public facility. Any impacts associated with the proposed amendments have been previously addressed by FEIR-OS-02. B. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, AND AMENDED EASTLAKE III SPA PLAN. The Eastlake III SPA Plan PFFP outlines the necessary public facilities required to meet its land use and circulation objectives of the General Plan. The PFFP outlines detailed plans for the provision of these public facilities as they relate to the proposed Project. The PFFP identifies any required Development Impact Fees (DIF) fees which must be paid to help defray costs of facilities which will benefit the project. The estimated facilities fees required by this project are $ 7,334,906.20. PAD fees are approximately $4,033,984.00. The fiscal revenues to the City associated with the Olympic Pointe project, range from $54,800 annually and rise to $309,000 at build-out. Fiscal expenditures would be initially $49,500 and rise to $279,000 at build-out The net fiscal impact to the City from developing the Olympic Pointe project. is positive throughout the development and results in annual net surplus of $29,700 at build-out. 6-84 Resolution No. Page 7 C. THE PFFP AMENDMENT ENSURES THAT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE CITY'S QUALITY OF LIFE STANDARDS. As required by the City's Growth Management Ordinance, the PFFP analyzes the impact of the project on public facilities and services and identifies the required public facilities and services needed to serve the project to maintain consistency with the City's Quality of Life Threshold Standards. The PFFP describes in detail the cost, financing mechanisms and timing for constructing public facilities required to ensure that development occurs only when the necessary public facilities exist or are provided concurrent with the demands of the new development. Certain facility improvements include requirements for the construction of a signal at the intersection of Olympic Parkway and the project entrance. Other required measures are related to fire protection, water conservation, water quality, air quality and traffic. Implementation of these measures along with payment of any required DIF fees will ensure the Project will maintain consistency with the City's Quality of Life Standards. Based on the findings above, the City Council approves the docuement entitled "Eastlake III SPA Plan Public Facilities Finance Plan" dated October 28, 2010, which document accompanies the staff report as Attachment 6. VI. APROVAL OF AMENDMENTS AND ADDENDUMS TO ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS. The City Council approves the amendments to the associated regulatory documents including: the Design Guidelines and the Addendums to the AQIP and WCP for Eastlake III SPA Plan as shown in Attachment 5. VIII. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the forgoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to the their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, instituted and prosecute litigate or compel their compliance or seek damages for their violations. No vested rights are gained by Applicant or successor in interest by the City approval of this Resolution. 6-85 Resolution No. Page 8 IX. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon enforceability of each and every term provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by the Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, if the city so determines in its sole discretion, this resolution shall be deemed to be revoked and no further in force or in effect ab initio. Presented by Gary Halbert, AICP, PE Assistant City Manager/Director of Development Services Approved as to form by ~` ` Glen R. G ogins Ci rney 6-86 ORDINANCE ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE III PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND LAND USE DISTRICTS MAP FOR 18.4 ACRES AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OLYMPIC PARKWAY AND WUESTE ROAD I. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject of this Ordinance is diagrammatically represented in "Exhibit A" attached to and incorporated into this Ordinance, and commonly known as Olympic Pointe, and for the general purpose of general description herein consists of 18.4 acres located at the southwest corner of Olympic Parkway and Wueste Road intersection within the Eastlake III Planned Community ("Project Site"); and, B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department on April 12, 2010, by Integral Partners XXIV, LLC for Eastlake Project Owner LLC ("Developer"), requesting approval of amendments to the Eastlake III Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use Districts Map; and, C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various entitlements and agreements, including: 1) a General Plan Amendment, General Development Plan and Sectional Planning Area Plan and associated Design Guidelines, Public Facilities Financing Plan, Water Conservation Plan and Air Quality Improvement Plan and Comprehensive Affordable Housing Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No.2002-220 on July 17, 2001; and amended on June 20, 2006 for the Eastlake III Seniors Project and; 2) Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use Districts Map approved by Ciry Council Ordinance No. 2839 on July 24, 2001, and amended by City Council Ordinance No. 2963 on May 18, 2004; and further amended on June 20, 2006 for the Eastlake III Seniors Project; and further amended in April, 2008 for the Windstar Point Resort project, and; 3) Tentative Subdivison Map approved by City Council Resolution 2006-191 on June 20, 2006; and, D. Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a 6-87 Ordinance No. Page 2 newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project, at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on November 10, 2010, and voted 5-1-0-1 to forward a recommendation to the City Council on the Project; and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on this project held on November 10, 2010, and the minutes and resolution resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and E. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project application and notices of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and, WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on December 14, 2010, in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, City of Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 4:00 p.m. to receive the recommendations ofthe Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to the same; and WHEREAS, the City Council heard public testimony, closed the hearing and continued the item to the City Council meeting of January 11, 2011 to allow the applicant to work with staff to discuss any design concerns and at the discretion of the applicant to take the Project back to the Design Review Board far review; and WHEREAS, at the request of the applicant, the Design Review Board reviewed the project on December 20, 2010 and held a public hearing on the Project on January 10, 2011; and WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public heazing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on January 11, 201 I in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 4:00 p.m. to receive the recommendations ofthe Design Review Board, and to hear public testimony with regard to the same. F. Discretionary Approvals Resolution and Ordinance WHEREAS, at the same City Council heazing at which this Ordinance was introduced for first reading on December 14, 2010 the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approved Resolution , by which it approved amendments to the Eastlake III Sectional Planning Area Plan, Design Guidelines, the Public Facilities Financing Plan, the Air Quality Improvement Plan and the Water Conservation Plan; 6-88 Ordinance No. Page 3 G. Environmental Determination WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Quality Act ("CEQA") and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, Eastlake III Senior Housing Project, FEIR OS-02. The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent documents have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director has prepared an Addendum to this document, Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, Eastlake III Senior Housing Project, FEIR OS-02. NO W THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: A. CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN The City Council finds that the proposed amendments to the Eastlake III Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use District Map are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan. The residential nature of the proposed use would be consistent with the adopted high-density residential designation for this project site and compatible with the surrounding residential and open space land uses of the Eastlake area. B. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The City Council approves the amendments to the Eastlake III Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use District Map as represented in Exhibit B. III. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by Gary Halbert, AICP, PE Assistant City Manager/Director of Development Services Approved as to form by ~JZ Glen R. G©ogins ney 6-89 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA GRANTING A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR A PROPOSED 389 UNIT CONDOMINUM PROJECT FOR 18.4 ACRES AT THE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OLYMPIC PARKWAY AND WUESTE ROAD L RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject of this Resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached to and incorporated into this Resolution, and commonly known as Olympic Pointe, and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 18.4 acres ("Project Site"); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Deparhnent on April 12, 2010 by Integral Partners XXIV, LLC for Eastlake Project Owner, LLC ("Applicant"), requesting approval of a new 389 unit condominium project for the Project Site ("Project"); and C. Environmental Determination WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, Eastlake III Senior Housing Project, FEIR OS-02. The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of subsequent documents have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director has prepared an addendum to this document, Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, Eastlake III Senior Housing Project, FEIR 05- 02. D. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project application and notices of said hearings, together with its purposes given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet. of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the heazing; and 6-90 Resolution No. Page 2 WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on December 14, 2010 in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 4:00 p.m. to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to the same. WHEREAS, the City Council heard public testimony, closed the hearing and continued the item to the City Council meeting of January 11, 2011 to allow the applicant to work with staff to discuss any design concerns and at the discretion of the applicant to take the Project to the Design Review Board for review; and WHEREAS, at the request of the applicant, the Design Review Board reviewed the project on December 20, 2010 and held a public hearing on the Project on January 10, 2011; and WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on January 11, 2011 in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 4:00 p.m. to receive the recommendations of the Design Review Board, and to heaz public testimony with regazd to the same. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista that it finds, determines, and resolves as follows: III. DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS/ APPROVAL A. THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, AS CONDITIONED, IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT REGLUATIONS OF THE PLANNED COMMUNITY, EASTLAKE VISTAS PLANNING AREA, RM-1 ZONE. The proposed project will comply with all development standards of the RM-1 development standards of the PC District Regulations as amended by the accompanying Ordinance regazding parking standards. B. THE DESIGN FEATURES OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ARE CONSISTENT WITH, AND ARE A COST EFFECTIVE METHOD OF SATISFYING, THE EASTALAKE III SPA DESIGN GUIDELINES AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DESIGN MANUAL AND LANDSCAPE MANUAL. The design features are consistent with the multi-family residential design standards contained in the City's Design Manual. Landscaping and open space have been provided as required by the multi-family open space requirements per Title 19 of the 6-91 Resolution No. Page 3 CVMC and the City's Landscape Manual. IV. APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT Based on the findings above, the City Council approves the Design Review Permit subject to the conditions set forth below: A. The following shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the City, prior to issuance of building permits, unless otherwise specified. Prior to, or in conjunction with the submittal of plans for the building permit, pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees for deposit account DQ-1627. 2. The colors and materials specified on the building plans must be consistent with the colors and materials shown on the site plan and materials board approved by the City Council on December 14, 2010, or as subsequently modified per their direction. Concurrent with the building permit submittal, provide a detailed landscape plan prepared by a registered landscape architect for review and approval. Plans shall be prepared per Landscape Manual and CVMC requirements. Existing landscape that is to be reinstalled must utilize drought tolerant landscaping in compliance with Chapter 20.12 of the Municipal Code. No turf shall be used. The "Concept Design Statement, Design Objective" must include a reference to the Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance which states...and the Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance, Municipal Code Chapter 20.12". 4. All ground mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City. 5. A graffiti resistant treatment shall be specified for all wall and building surfaces. This shall be noted for any building and wall plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Development Services prior to the issuance of building permits. Additionally, the project shall conform to Sections 9.20.055 of the CVMC regarding graffiti control. The Applicant shall develop, submit and obtain approval of "Recycling and Solid Waste Management Plan" by the City's Conservation Coordinator. The synopsis of the plan shall be included in the notes on the Building Plans. The plan shall demonstrate those steps that the Applicant will take to comply with the Municipal Code, including but not limited to Sections 8.24 and 8.25, and meet the State mandate to reduce or divert 50 % of the waste 6-92 Resolution No. Page 4 generated by commercial, residential and industrial developments. The Applicant shall contract with the City's franchise hauler throughout the construction and occupancy phase of the project. The Plan shall include a statement of how the Applicant will implement and participate in the Recycling and Solid Waste Management Plan requirements and how yard waste will be diverted. The proposed trash enclosure shall be designed with appropriate screening. 7. The Applicant shall implement to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director and the City Engineer the mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report, Eastlake III Senior Housing Project, FEIR OS-02 and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. I and DPVelonment Fngine~ring 8. Applicant shall pay the following fees: a. Sewer Capacity Fees b. Traffic Signal Fees c. Development Impact Fees per Master Fee Schedule 9. Prior to issuance of Building Permits or prior to beginning any earthwork activities, development must obtain a Land Development Permit in accordance with Grading Ordinance No. 1797. 10. Prior to approval of grading and improvement plans, applicant shall indicate all sewer and drainage facilities will be private. 11. Applicant shall be required to obtain a construction permit from the Development Services Department to perform all work in the City's right-of--way, including: Lateral connections to existing public utilities. Installation of driveway 12. Prior to approval of the first building permit or as otherwise determined by the City Engineer, the Developer shall: i. Design, construct, and secure a fully actuated traffic signal including interconnect wiring, mast arms, signal heads and associated equipment, underground improvements, standards and luminaries at the Olympic Parkway/Project Driveway intersection. The design of the traffic signal shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and conform to City standards. Developer shall provide the following intersection geometry: 6-93 Resolution No. Page 5 a. Westbound: One left-turn lane (with 100 feet of storage) and two through lanes b. Northbound: One left-turn lane and one right-turn lane (with a storage length of 75 feet in each lane) c. Eastbound: One shared through/right-turn lane and one through lane d. Southbound: None A traffic signal shall be installed at the project driveway and two outbound (northbound) lanes, one left-turn and one right-turn lane and two inbound (southbound) lanes shall be provided. ii. Relocate the median opening on Olympic Parkway further west from its current location to accommodate the proposed project driveway. In addition, the applicant shall provide the pertinent landscape improvements to the satisfaction of the Director of the Development Services Department. iii. Provide pedestrian ramps along Olympic Parkway (within frontage of the project) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. iv. Install a "No U Turn" sign for eastbound traffic on Olympic Parkway at the Olympic Pazkway/Wueste Road intersection. The Developer shall fully design the aforementioned improvements in conjunction with the improvement plans for the related project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 13. Prior to issuance of grading permits, developer shall enter into a Storm Water Facilities Maintenance Agreement with the City before approval of the grading plans for the site. The Developer shall agree to install, inspect, maintain, repair and replace all private storm water management facilities within the Developer's project. 14. Developer shall present verification to the City Engineer in the form of a letter from Otay Water District that the subdivision will be provided adequate water service and long-term water storage facilities. The Developer shall phase and install water system improvements as required by the Otay Water District. 15. Prior to issuance of grading permits, Developer shall obtain a letter of permission to grade from the US Olympic Committee for any work encroaching into the Olympic Training Center's property. 16. The Developer shall process a Final Map to divide the property into the proposed seven lots. The process of the Final Map shall be in compliance with the City's Municipal Code Chapter 18, the City's Subdivision Manual, and the Subdivision Map Act. 6-94 Resolution No. Page 6 17. Prior to approval of the Final Map, the Developer shall submit and obtain the approval of the City of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the project site. 18. Prior to issuance of grading permits, Developer shall design all grading work in accordance with Chula Vista Ordinance 1797, Chapter 15.04 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, and the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual. In addition, development of this project shall comply with all requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Permit, Order No. R9-2007-0001 (Municipal Permit), the City of Chula Vista Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), the Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 14.20, and of the City of Chula Vista Development Storm Water Manual, as may be amended from time to time. 19. Developer shall provide evidence to the City Engineer that adequate sewer capacity does exist and that the City of San Diego Metropolitan Wasterwater Depatment ("Metro") has adequate sewage treatment capacity. All development must comply with the Municipal Code, specifically CVMC Sections 19.09.010 (A) 6 and 13.14.030. 20. Prior to approval of the Final Map, applicant shall obtain and dedicate to the City all the necessary easements for general utility and access purposes, as determined by the City Engineer. 21. Plans shall comply with Title 24 and 2007 California Building Code (CBC), California Mechanical Code (CMC), California Plumbing Code (CPC), California Electric Code (CEC) and 2008 California Energy Code. Fire• 22. Comply with all requirements of the Chula Vista Fire Department including the following: a) Ensure that the Fire Protection Plan specific to the wild land interface is in place; b) provide a breakdown of building square footage and building construction type for each building in order to determine the projects fire flow; c) provide an updated water supply analysis (technical report) for review and approval. Said report shall be a node-to- node analysis using the Hazen-Williams formula. The analysis shall show that the required fire flow is available at the hydrants and that simultaneously, the sprinkler demand is available at the most demanding sprinkler riser. B. The following on-going conditions shall apply to the property as long as it relies on this approval: 23. This permit shall become void and ineffective if not used or extended in accordance with Section 19.14.600 of the Municipal Code. 6-95 Resolution No. Page 7 24. All landscape and hardscape improvements shall be installed and maintained in accordance withthe approvedlandscape plan. 25. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of Title 19 of the Municipal Code, and other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 26. The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council members, officers, employees and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Design Review Permit and (b) City's approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated on the Project Site. The Property Owner and Applicant shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Design Review Permit where indicated below. The Property Owner's and Applicant's compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property Owner's and Applicant's successors and assigns. This condition may be modified by the Zoning Administrator subject to input from the City Attorney. Prior to the issuance of any permits required by the City of Chula Vista far the use of the subject property in reliance upon this approval, the Applicant/Representative and property owner shall execute this document by making a true copy of this letter of conditional approval and signing both this original letter and the true copy on the lines provided below, said execution indicating that the Applicant/Representative and Property Owner have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement the same. Upon execution, the true copy with original signatures shall be returned to the Project Planner in the Development Services Department. Failure to return the signed copy of this document within thirty days of the effective date hereof shall indicate the Applicants/Representative's or Property Owner's desire that the project, and the corresponding application for building permits and/or a business license, be held in abeyance without approval. Signature of Property Owner Signature of Applicant Date Date 6-96 Resolution No. Page 8 V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the forgoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to the their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, instituted and prosecute litigate or compel their compliance or seek damages for their violations. No vested rights are gained by Applicant or successor in interest by the City approval of this Resolution. VI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon enforceability of each and every term provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by the Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, if the city so determines in its sole discretion, this resolution shall be deemed to be revoked and no further in force or in effect ab initio. Presented by Gary Halbert, AICP, PE Assistant City Manager/Director of Development Services Approved as to form by ~`1i r/.~ Glen R. Googins City Att rney 6-97 NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Public Hearing noticed for December 14, 2010 to consider: APPLICATIONS FILED BY INTEGRAL PARTNERS XXVI, LLC FOR EASTLAKE PROPERTY OWNERS, LLC TO DEVELOP AN 18.4 ACRE SITE WITH A 389-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT was continued to January 11, 2011 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, Building 100. Dated: December 16, 2010 ~~ ~~~~ Donna Norris, CMC City Clerk I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Chula Vista fn the Office of the City Cterk and that I posted this document on the bulletin board according to Brown Act requirements. Dated ~ j1' ~~ Slgned7~ ~-°`°"""-" lT~f~~DYJ~,C -ZV!{~jrY1~R.fi'Or~ Z~ vri ~ 6 ACTION AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Chula Vista, California January 10, 2011 4:30 p.m. 276 Fourth Avenue Council Chambers ROLL CALL: Calvo, Nava, Martinez, Balvaneda, ABSENT: Jenks APPROVAL OF MINUTES: None PUBLIC COMMENTS: None PUBLIC HEARING: 1. DRC-10-08 Design Review for the construction of a new 389-unit condominium project known as Olympic Pointe to be located on an 18.4 site at the southwest corner of Wueste Road and Olympic Parkway. Project Manager: Jeff Steichen, Associate Planner Action: (Calvo/Martinez) (4-0-0-1) 1. Found that the design of the project is consistent with the Eastlake III SPA Multi-Family Design Guidelines; and 2. Recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution approving the design, subject to the conditions contained therein. ADJOURNMENT: At 4:51 p.m. to a regular meeting of the Design Review Board on January 17, 2011 at 4:30 p.m. in Council Chambers. COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), requests individuals who may require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service to request such accommodation at least forty-eight hours in advance for meetings and five days in advance for scheduled services and activities. Please contact Diana Vargas for specific information at (619) 691-5101 or Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TDD) (619) 585-5647. California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired. Page 1 of 1 Patricia Salvation From: Steve Power Sent: Mon 1/10/2011 2:05 PM To: Patricia Salvation Cc: Subject: FW: Olympic Pointe Project Attachments: Patricia, please pass this out at DRB tonight. thanks -----Original Message----- From: Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 1:32 PM To: Steve Power Subject: Olympic Pointe Project To all Design Review Board Members: After learning of the project near the intersection of Olympic and Wueste Rd., I took the time to drive there to get a feel for the area and project site. After careful consideration it is my opinion that what must be described as an average condominium project is not the best use for this property. There is probably no undeveloped land of this quality left on the east side and should not be squandered on what could easily be built elsewhere. I am urging you to take a position that will lead to consideration of only an upscale usage of this fine view property. Sincerely, David Danciu, president Crossroadsll Civic Association https://owa. chulavistaca.gov/exchange/PatriciaS/Inbox/FW:%2001ympic%20Pointe%20... O 1 / 10/2011 Page 1 of 1 Patricia Salvation From: Steve Power Sent: Mon 1/10/2011 2:07 PM To: Patricia Salvation Cc: Subject: FW: Please give each DRC member a copy Attachments: Please pass out at DRB. thanks -----Original Message----- From: Susan Watry Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 1:13 PM To: Steve Power Subject: Please give each DRC member a copy Begin forwarded message: From: Susan Watry ~ Date: January 10, 2011 12:29:33 PM PST To: spowers ci.chula-vista.ca.us Cc: Steve Castaneda <scastaneda(a~chulavistaca.gov_>, Patricia Aguilar <paguilar@chulavistaca,gov>, Rudy Ramirez <rramirez@chulavistaca.gov>, Pamela Bensoussan <~bensoussan@chulavistaca.gov>, Cheryl Cox <ccox@chulavistaca.g_ov>, Jim Sandoval <Sandoval ci.chula- vista.ca.us> Subject: Please give each DRC member a copy Design Review Commission Members: Not so long ago we approved a new General Plan. Almost before [he ink was dry a major developer brought forward a proposal for a grand upscale Del Webb Senior Community. Crossroads did not oppose the required amendment to change the zoning. The heavy hitter developer and Del Webb are long gone. Then a really awful project for over 400 apartments came forth and then was gone, Now this mediocre project appears and the main thing the developer can say about it is that it is better (not as bad) than the last proposal. Sadly ,this is what is wrong with Chula Vista; we are always given what is best for the developer and the comunity be damned! I urge you to really look at this project in context of this increblbly beautiful property before you bless it. Susan Watry https://owa. chulavistaca.gov/exchange/PatriciaS/Inbox/FW: %20Please%20give%20each... O 1 / 10/2011 Page 1 of 1 Patricia Salvation From: Steve Power Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 8:50 AM To: Patricia Salvation Subject: FW: Please forward this e-mail to the Design Review Committee Members For The Meeting Today: Patricia, please give this to the DRB today. thanks -----Original Message----- From: Todd G. Glanz Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 8:46 AM To: Steve Power Cc: Steve Castaneda; Rudy Ramirez; Patricia Aguilar; Pamela Bensoussan Subject: Please forward this a-mail to the Design Review Committee Members For The Meeting Today: Please recognize that the City Council sent the project proposed for the intersection of Olympic Parkway & Wueste for your review, on the issue of whether it is the best design use for this property. On behalf of many of us in the area, and most other residents that do not have a special economic interest in the use of this pristine land location, we strongly urge you to reject the proposed design in context with the best use of this land for the citizens of Chula Vista. This pristine property is unlike any other in the City because of its proximity and views of the lake and mountains. Another condominium project, and one of the average variety proposed, would be a very poor use of this property and in this context of the design proposed, for reasons of aesthetics, economics and the far greater return to the city in fiscal terms shown in reports already performed comparing the use of this land as visitor/tourist commercial, and considering the best civic alternative for the citizens of Chula Vista. The land design r use proposed will clearly not take advantage of the opportunity we have here to enhance the city's image and vitality. 01/10/2011 Page 1 of 1 Patricia Salvation From: Steve Power Sent: Mon 1/10/2011 2:10 PM To: Patricia Salvation Cc: Subject: FW: Olympic Parkway Attachments: Please pass along. thanks -----Original Messa a----- From _ Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 1:10 PM To: Steve Power Subject: Olympic Parkway (Steve -- please forward this to all the members of the Design Review Committee. Thanks) T0: Members of the Design Review Committee I have often told the City Council, and I once had occasion to tell the County Board of Supervisors, that I think the view eastward across Otay Lakes and to the mountains beyond is the most beautiful view in Southern California. I was born in Los Angeles 79 years ago, and have lived in Chula Vista for 50 years, so I consider myself an expert on Southern California views. Originally this property was zoned "commercial/visitor," which would have allowed wonderful and creative designs for the property that could have been enjoyed by visitors and residents alike. Through several changes, we now have a project which is just a common, "flat-land" design for 389 condos no different than thousands of other condo units in the county. A few, but only a FEW, will have spectacular private views, but what a waste, what a waste! You members of the Design Review Committee, by the very qualifications that put you on this Committee, must be equally appalled by the project. I dare to hope that all of you are as offended by this low-value use of the unique site as I am. Please hold to your principles Peter Watry 81 Second Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 https://owa. chulavistaca.gov/exchange/PatriciaS/Inbox/FW : %2001ympic%20Parkway.E... O 1 /10/2011 sieve rower From: Brian Lightbod Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 3:51 PM To: Steve Power Subject: Condo project on Olympic Parkway and Wueste Roatl. Mr. Powers, Please forward my comments on to the design review committee The originally intended use o£ the land in question andbef ore the Design Review Committee was £or visitor/tourist commercial uses. If memory serves correctly a hotel was planned at one time and subsequently zoning for the land changed to allow for higher end condos. It seems to be ill conceived to permit the poorly designed condo project that is proposed and before the D RC today to obtain approval. The design proposed in not in keeping with the area, is a poor reflection on the area in question, and should be rejected on that basi s. Please reject the project design as poorly conceived for the area and intended use of the land. Regards, Brian Lightbody Chula Vista, CA Page 1 of 1 Steve Power From: Gloria E. Cazares Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 3:46 PM To: Steve Power Subject: Olympic Parkway Please Forward this message to the Design Review Committee. Thank You TO: To the Design Review Committee On behalf of many of us in the area, and most other residents that do not have a special economic interest in the use of this pristine land location, we strongly urge you to reject the proposed design in context with the best use of this land for the citizens of Chula Vista. This unique property location with its proximity to the lakes and mountains provides an excellent Eco- environment for our children our community and future generations. Does NOT fit for a condominium project and would be a very poor use of this property. Please review the land design and clearly do NOT destroy one of the beauties of Chula Vista. Thank you, Gloria E. Cazares 01/10/2011 Page 1 of 1 Jeff Steichen From: Steve Power Sent: Tuesday, Ja tuary 11, 2011 11:47 AM To: Jeff Steichen Subject: FW: 389-condo project @ Olympic Parkway -----Original Message----- From: Cathy Radcliffe Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 7:56 PM To: Steve Power Subject: 389-condo project @ Olympic Parkway TO: Ta the Design Review Committee Please recognize that the City Council sent the project proposed for the intersection of Olympic Parkway & Wueste for your review, on the issue of whether it is the best design use for this property. On behalf of many of Chula Vista citizens residents that do not have a special economic interest in the use of this pristine land location, my family and I strongly urge you to reject the proposed design in context with the best use of this land for the citizens of Chula Vista. This pristine property is unlike any other in the City because of its proximity and views of the Take and mountains. Another condominium project, and one of the average variety proposed, would be a very poor use of this property. In the context of the design proposed, for reasons of aesthetics, economics and the far greater return to the city in fiscal terms. This latter point has been shown in reports already performed comparing the use of this land as visitor/tourist commercial, and considering the best civic alternative for the citizens of Chula Vista. ................. The land design use proposed will clearly not take advantage of the opportunity we have here to enhance the city's image and vitality. This land is too beautiful and too valuable a resource to waste it on yet another condo project!!!! There are many better suited projects for the land adjacent to the Olympic Training Center and Otay Lake. Don't repeat past mistakes!!! regards - Cathy Radcliffe Barbara Radcliffe Steve Radcliffe 01/11/2011 Jeff Steiehen From: Steve Power Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:47 AM To: Jeff Steichen Subject: FW: No thanks -----Original Message----- From: Elva Mellor Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 5:30 PM To: Steve Power Subject: No thanks Don't think that fancy condos are needed in CV. with special views, etc. for only a few. ALL citizens should have the opportunity to use this area and enjoy it. Elva Mellor 1