Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1982/10/12 Item 7COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 7 Meeting Date 10/12/82 ITEM TITL~: Resolution //0.3 ~- Ordering the proposed "Shaw Reorganization" SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X ) On A ril 30, 1981 the City received a petition from Dr. Walter Shaw for a proposed reor anization involving annexation of 2.77 acres of property to the City of Chula Vist and detachments from the San Diego County Flood Control District-Zone 3 and the onita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District. The property owner is pursuing anne ation to the City in order to obtain an increased level of municipal services (sew r, fire and police protection) for one existing residence and two proposed for deve opment. The proposal area is shown on Exhibit A of this report. The ocal Agency Formation Commission approved this proposal at their meeting of Sep tuber 14, 1981, and authorized the City Council to initiate reorganization proc edings. RECOMMENDATION: That Council Ado t a resolution ordering the "Shaw Reorganization" involving annexation to the City of hula Vista and detachments from the San Diego County Flood Control District-Zone 3 and the Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District. BOA~D/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION . The proposal area is currently in the unincorporated territory of the County an is situated at the southern terminus (extended) of Palm Drive just north of Gr enwood Place. The area is uninhabited (has less than 12 registered voters residing th reon) and the proposal has been consented to by 100% of the involved property owners. 2. General Plans and Zoning. The County's Sweetwater Community Plan designates the proposal area medium-low re idential (2 DU/Ac.). Existing County zoning would also allow two dwelling units pe acre. The City's General Plan designates the area low density residential (1-3 DU/Ac.). As a result of the City's Sweetwater Valley prezoning program in October, 1971, the pr perty was prezoned R-E (20,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size, or two dwelling units pe acre) . 3. Proposed development plans. Concurrent with annexation processing, the proponent has submitted a tentative pa cel map to the City. The submitted map calls for the creation of three lots, on of which will accommodate an existing dwelling and two proposed for the future de el opment of single family dwellings. The proposed development is in conformance wi h the City's current General Plan and prezoning classification. continued Form A-h13 (Rev. 11/79) ~_ ~~v3 Page 2, Item 7 Meeting Date 10/12/82 Environmental Review. he Environmental Review Committee, at their regular meeting of July 23, 1981, considered an Initial Study, IS-82-2, for the proposed reorganization and companion tent tive parcel map. The Committee issued a Conditioned Negative Declaration and concluded that the proposal, subject to the conditions of said Negative Declaration, woul not have a significant effect on the environment. LAFCO action. he Local Agency Formation Commission, at their public hearing on September 14, 1981 adopted a resolution approving the proposed reorganization. Said resolution, at p ge 2, paragraph 7, reads, "Pursuant to Government Code Section 56271.1 the City of C ula Vista is hereby authorized to initiate reorganization proceedings in comp fiance with Government Code Section 56430 et seq. and this resolution, without noti a and hearing and without an election." Delivery of municipal services. he subject property is provided access via a steep and narrow asphalt-paved priv to driveway at the southerly end of Palm Drive. Unfortunately, due to the phys cal characteristics of the driveway, there would be a substantial delay in the resp nse of City fire fighting equipment to the site. The Fire Department has indicated that they cannot assure emergency fire service to the proposed development if access road grades are greater than 16% and that an alternate fire protection system would be r quired if access cannot be assured. It should be noted, however, that municipal services can be provided to the area without an increase in manpower and/or equipment. AFCO, in concurrence with the City's Conditioned Negative Declaration, officially adop ed the following environmental finding fora significant impact of the proposed reor anization: 'Fire Safety Impacts and Mitigation: The City Fire Department indicates that they annot assure emergency fire service if access road grades are greater than 16%. 'Emergency fire protection system shall be approved prior to development of any ew structures. The City of Chula Vista Fire Department shall approve plans prior o development." ince the property in question cannot be adequately served for fire protection, the Fire Marshal has recommended that sprinkler systems be installed in the two pro sed dwelling units in lieu of adequate fire protection and that said recommendation be adopted as a condition of approval of the applicant's parcel map. The aforementioned con ition of approval was adopted by the City on December 15, 1981 in conjunction with ten ative parcel map 82-1. FISaAL IMPACT The City will receive property tax revenue from the proposal area post annexation. The amount of revenue received will be that which has been authorized under the Master Pro erty Tax Exchange Agreement currently in effect between the City and the County. JN:tim ~_ //0 3 ~ 3;1. ~ ~ G;.FG~E 1 1 ~ /t ~ ! ~ I !'„- ~ ! I ~anE 1 1 ~ r ~ 1 ~~ r D - ! I I -~ >- I ~ ~~_ , ~ ~ I - - ~-+ ~ _ 1 II 1 11 ! I 1 _ r--~ ~------ - ~ I 1 I~ 1,' ~ _' p I i ~I k-`` ~ ~ t I e e ~ ~~i 'COS~RtZr-y m 1 ----. ' ~ # ~ TY ' ~, ,/ ~ ~i ~ 1~ - ' ~ ~ ~ ~-- - 1 - ~~ - ~ ,_ ...~ T ~) ~ 1~_ i - , , - - ~ .•...,~ __ 9 ~ -, , z~_ _ ,- - ~ ~ " J --~- `_ ~ ~ _ '\\ ~ ~ i ~ \ ~ / v _ _ .<. I ~~' ~Z ~' ~ ~` ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J i'~\ • ~ C9a _ r _ . r i / ~~ ~ ` 0 1 ~` .C ~ .. t ~ • C~ ~, a ~ - - FS _ ~ i _ _ PR+DPOSEQ~ SHAW -REQR<<iAIUIZATi S~q~~ ~CQ 2.77 Ages ~_ - ~_ - • 0 200' aoo' Ros -23 ~ -_ 4 ^: , E?:iiIBIT "B" ~~ 1 AN2~'EXP.TI01\ -- SHAW PROPERTY ASSESSOR'S P~RCE:., tJO. 593-111-07 That portion of the Easterly Ilalf of Quarter Sec*_ior. 46 of Rancho do 1 2~acion, ~ ir. the Count}~ o` San Diego, State o`_ California, aoco c ins to t•?ap thereof Teo. 166., filed ir.- the Office of the C~ur.~}' Reorder of San Diego County, described as follows: Beci.i~inq at the most Southerly corner of Lot 56, Alock 'E' ~f Eonit~ F?ills Unit No. 1, according to Map thereof No. 2139, filed in the Ofi~e o.` County Recorder of San Diego Cour,t:v, said corner b.^.inr: also tT'~~ riosy. Easterly corner o{ the land describer in the doe ' to I~arc;ld F., Tatu ,, et al , rrcorc~ec Fe'~r•~arv 11 , 193a in Eook 513, ps..e 2E7 of Official ?eccrds; thence South 32°54' west along the Sct:t~c~asterly line of said lane, 552 feet to the mos~ Southcrl~* cor er :hero`; thence a'•onc thc~ S:iuthwe~t~~rly li.n~ of said lance, ,:or h 6300:' West 650 feet tc the true point of begin..^.ine~; thence ret.~c.nc South 6?~O1' Fast 300 feet; thence North 31°24,0" East 24G. 0~ : ect; :hence North ..go55' West 4.20 feet to a .'anaLnt 29.80 `eo r:~ciu5 curve concave r,i:sterl~t; thence ;7ortheriy zlong said c.~r~ e . 4 ~ . 8? fee:. throuch an angle of 9!x`'00' to a print of rn~• rse c~.:rvaure, havinc a radius of 1SG feet; thencE'- Northe-)y along s:;i curVC 105. CO feet throuch an an~lc of 33°''7' ; theme tangent to si•_id curve, North 2022 ~ t,7est 8~ • 91 feet to a tanaer.t 160 foot r~C L'~ C:+r`le COnCaVe :vCStCrl~:; th`11CE' NnrtherlV aloI)g Sulu CLrVe, _ .. _ , ~ 1 nn 7~ ~: C_ `.ti:=OJCr ar. cn~~ C: :rr'~S' tti~,^_^C~ ~c raCE':t`.G Sc_Cl CLrVE' ^:Cr }' 3QC _ % ~ ;~est~54. 6 / felt tC Po1':t "~" Cf th15 deSCriCtlOn, be i. c also the becinr.inc of a tanoe:~t 500 `oot ra^ius cL-~Te concat*e :~e:.- h~as:.erly; hence _eavinc said carve, South ~10~3' Wept J 0 jee thence South 3Eo47'23"JWest 541.55 feet to the 1RuF POT_n^' nF /,-/ ~ ~ `- %~ C~ , „-./,,~ . ~. ~L JD":: do f-pproved by the Local Agency Formation L - ~ J 4 4 Commission of San Diego SEP 141981 Lr. C 0 °/ 6/81 ~~~HIBIT "~'- Mg Page 1 of 1 ~~w ~• ~~ Cxecutive Officer of said Commissar !~ si:aiz•rrt~n -?r. C.ha+ies lti, iiatlur ?ublic !~-iamt_r p).t?Ci.ItIV? d Y,'i1G~~ C. cu:~rs:~ a;.~.lle t. ~ :nEmSsrs Hri¢%t Yr. •~he Otav Nur,ic ltistyt ~ii5tr Paui ~~, furd L^U^.tyL')i ,~,t:¢trYISU(5 Tour Fi::r.:':: (:Wanly 6tri Dz:: _sac Coup: ;{r.ief Herron .irc Cilarir• fricClr CULiCii'N7. Ci:y Of 'Jis l.acal alg~nc~ ~ armatbon comm~ss~o~ t6©C3 pacttlc highway • san d1~~o, ~. 9~9t?t CERTI: jCATE RE: TERMS AND CONDITICNS A~iD TNDI;BTEDNES~ Subjact' "Sha~.a Reorganization" City of Chula Vista • F.O81-23 Cer_ ta:i.n tE~s and conditions are requ~.red by the Lccal Agency Fo~.:tion Com~-niss on to be f~aliilloc? prior *_r~ the comFl,/tion of the ab;~ve-named change ai ergar_i~ation, i+,n - ' 1 Jennie M. Fulasz City Clerk --___.. (,ta~~'1 Tit"t~~) .., O~ do hereby cerr_if ~ trla t the tzru~s and co ,diti:;ns lis 4ed helow have bzen fully Bret. Ui city o. St:a~lay :, kq tir Sa' !~zn~o~ Ga.miy Y:u:B: >;str r'e(1 rg LPtn Vilii i~Ci~?&i VJotcr Ci~:r ct Pain E.iceri County oc' rtl o`. lV.ik~ C'+etch Councitm(; .ter, ~;ity of $;,n Gi.:cio !:1u)J(36 IiB +' 111 Y1~tlne rI,H ~'i QItC?10(! Lis*.ric' None. t ',~~.1'1 t}le a.ft ac.tec? property be taxed nor a, c e;{zsting bonded ~.nuebte.:;ness or ccrtracttsal ebligatiUr_' 3•es X Div ~_. I~ yes, s~es::i.f;r• 1970 Police Facility Bond Tax rate equals $.00634 per $1 0 full propertfy~v~al~u'e. Signature -~~-- ~~~~~~~~ Date R- i~a 3~ RO£~I-23 f/ ENVIROI~MENTAL SUMMARY AND FII:DII:GS FOR SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF "SHAY; REORGP_NTZFTION" Lead Agency: City of Chula Vista UN~7AR1' eologv/Soils Impacts and Mitigation: The Chula Vista City ngineer indicates that there is an active potential for land- lides on the project site, as well_as expansive soils. "Geotechnical and soils reports shall be prepared addressing landslide potential on the supject site and any recommendations shall be incorporated into an}~ grdding or development plans." Drainage Impacts and Mitigation: The proposed project is located within the watershed area of the Long Canyon drainage basin and west of the downstream end of the existing drain system, though not within the boundary of the 100 year Floodnlain. This drainage system is presently inadecuate to handle existing and future runoff. "The developer shall agree to not oppose the formation of any assessment districts for the improvement of drainage systems." Fire Safety Impacts and Iviitigation: The City Fire Department indicates that they cannot assure eme_gency fire service if access road grades are greater than 16~. "Emergency fire protection system shall be approved prior to development of any new structures. The City of Chula Vista Fire Department shall approve plans prior to development." schools Impacts anc rlitication: Tre City junior high school is presently at or exceer.s capacity. "Y'ritten assurance shall be obtained from tre local elementar~~ and high school districts that adequate classroom space is available prior to the creation of new lots." Parks Impacts ar.e. Mitigation: City Park District 14.01 currently has no developed park acreage and the ultimate development of the project site will increase the need for such. "Park acquisition and development fees shall be paid prior to development of any new units." sewers Impacts and Mitigation: The present sewer system is in- adequate to handle ultimate development of the property. "The developer shall agree not to oppose the formation of an assessment district for the purpose of improving the existing sewer capacity." Exhibit "E" Page 1 of 2 ~ //~~~ 7 FIt:DIP1GS Pursuant to Section 15088 (a) of the State EIP. Guidelines, find that the mitigation measures listed above for the identified impacts nave been adopted by th8 City of Chula Vista, and that the mitigation is within the jurisdiction of the City of Chula Vista and not LAFCO because the affected resources and facilities will be within the City limits upon annexation. 1 kpDroved by the Local Agency FormatiDn Commission of San Ditgo SEP 141981 Executive Officer of said Commission Exhibit "B" Page 2 of 2 ~- //~ 3y ~o -v~ ~C e0,~ ~ci ~ -9 o Pr, a' N-° s3 ~Q y/ ~ . .O ~~ qL 0 0 ~ ~ F e~Y w v ~ a SS ~ /~`~ ~ ~/ '( v ~ ,~ V' ~ ~ ti SS / 3h o ~~ ~` h ~ ~ P.O.B. S> o ~ s ,~b 5 0 ° FOR. i/4 SEC. 46 8 h ~19.8o RHO. DE LA NAC10N 46.81 ,~ MAP 166 ' p ~ ~'p sSLL T. P. O. B. 0 ~~~ o ~p~~ ~ h,~~ yD~ o° ti~ti ~~ cy~ ~~ <q ti ~ °'3e ~ per, ,~ Approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Diego SEP 141981 Executive Officer of said Commission N .r._.-.-~.... ~ ~ IaU1.P"F'tNG DIVISION LAFCO` RO 81=23 . ~ ~~~'~"~''''~ '~ CA~1NTY ASSESSORS OFFICE AREA: ... ...,~~., 2.77 AC. _ .~ . _ ... , ~, ~ ~;,~~,}~ ,~ ORGAN I Z AT i O N "`_: ~.. ** ~.""tr*n fry tlrr• ,Qs c„u~A VISTA B/L ~ 593 = ! I i .., . - " • .w "w-+wir* •`Meflr ~~~~~~fYllfk FIRE PROTECTION . ~~~ ~~~ +' ~ ~~" ~i.:« ~~~~~ f~~'!D COV-~tTY FLOOD CONTROL THOMAS $ROS: ~__~ . 70-C- 2