HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1982/05/04 Item 16COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 16
•
ITEM TI
Meeting Date 5/4/82
E: Adoption of an urgency interim ordinance under which the County General Plan
and Zoning Ordinance would be applied to the Montgomery Reorganization Area
SUBMITTE BY: Acting Director of Planning
The C'ty Council, meeting in regular session
ation of a proposed urgency interim ordinance
Plan nd Zoning Ordinance would be applied to
perio of 90 days.
~~ j~4/5ths Vote: Yes No X
~~
~n April 27, 1982, commenced its consider-
under which the San Diego County General
the Montgomery Reorganization area for a
Upon he recommendation of the City Manager, the subject item was continued to the
Counc 1 meeting of May 4, 1982, in order to enable staff to investigate the advisability
of th City's adoption of the San Diego General Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council
Conti~ue this item until its regular meeting of May 11, 1982.
BOARD/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
~he r quested continuance would enable the City Planning Department to prepare a report
which recommends the adoption of the County's Zoning Ordinance, but not the County
Gener 1 Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT None.
DMP:
r~
L
~,,~,
b: ~: ~" Cit~ Cou: _'I of
Chula Vist{;, Czifcrl~ia
;~`~
~~
~~
Form A-ll~i (Rev. 11/79)
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~'"l ~
•
ITEM TITI
SUBMITTE[
The Ci
City M
zoning
time a
of Chu
RE COMM
BOARD/
Meeting Date -4~-f8Z- ~~.~~~
_, Ordinance - Adopting Existing San Diego County Zoning and the Portion of the
San Diego County General Plan as said Zoning and said General Plan Apply to
that Certain Territory Designated as the Montgomery Reorganization
gY; City Attorney (4/5ths Vote: Yes x No
y Council has heretofore indicated, upon the recommendation of the
nager, that it desires to continue in effect existing planning and
regulations in the Montgomery Reorganization territory until such
the proposed Community Planning Committee working with the City
a Vista might recommend modifications thereof.
NDATION: Adopt the Interim Urgency Ordinance
OMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION:
In ord r to give firm direction to the City staff and provide staff with
the ab'lity to properly respond to applicants who have presently made
inquir regarding the nature of regulations under which they would operate
ithin the Montgomery Reorganization area in the event of annexation, it
ms esirable to act as expeditiously as possible to insure the con-
nuat'on of the General Plan provisions and the zoning ordinances affect-
ing th Montgomery Reorganization area.
Theref re, an interim ordinance has been prepared which will provide such
direction. It is very probable that such ordinance would be extended
beyond the 90 day period which can be accomplished by a public hearing
and th adoption of an extension for a period of not more than one year.
FISCALIIMPACT:
N/A
by ~„ :~~~ G ~~,
•~, 7-per r
~\
,'~
Form A-11~ (Rev. 11/79)