Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1982/04/06 Item 16COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 16 Meeting Date 4/6/82 r M IT M TITLE',: Resolution fDOi~~ Approving Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 4. Claim Submittal for HandYtrans SU MITTED ~Y: Development Services Administrate/,' /5ths Vote: Yes No X ) Th City lof Chula Vista's claim for Article 4.5 funds for FY 1982-83 was su mitted'to the Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) and to the Sa Diego ,Association of Governments (SANDAG) on April 1, 1982 in the amount of $197,50.00. State law requires that all transit operators submit their TD claim'on the first of April prior to the fiscal year for which they are cl iming ~DA funds. Data and information needed for claim preparation were no available to complete the claim in time for council consideration on Ma ch 23,' the last meeting date before the April 1 submittal deadline. Th refore it is my RE~OMMENDaTION: that council approve this claim submittal. RD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DI in $2 iCUSSION: The FY 1982-83 claim in the amount of $197,520.00 is a 7.7% :rease aver this fiscal year's approved claim of $183,383.00. The claim punt is'approximately 76% of the proposed FY 1982-83 HandYtrans budget of i0,480.g0. The remaining amount of $62,960.00 will be acquired through the Ilowing',revenue sources: 23,210.00 Farebox revenue 37,400.00 Reimbursement from Regional Center for Starlight Center service ,2,350.00 Other sources (investment earnings) $62,960.00 Total is clailm is based on estimated revenues and costs and is subject to dification based on the following factors: 1. Article 4.5 fund availability. According to SANDAG $1,385,600 in Article 4.5 funds will be available in FY 1982-83 for community transit services in the SANDAG jurisdiction. This projection ssumes continuation of the Article 4.5 program which currently will ~erminate on December 31, 1982 unless S6573 is passed by the state fiegislature. SB573 extends the Article 4.5 program indefinitely. ,assuming continuation of Article 4.5 funds for the 12 months of I Page 2, Item No.16 Meeting Date 4/67$'~- F'Y 1982-83 it should be pointed out that these funds are not allocated to operators but are granted to operators on a dhscretionary basis. Handytrans must therefore compete with other operators for these funds. SANDAG will approve the funds based on: a'. Fund availability for all claimants, and b. Each operator's fulfillment of service and performance objectives required by the TDA and by SANDAG. 2. T~~e proposed farebox revenue of $23,210.00 is based on a revised fare structure which will be presented to council in the near fluture. 3. Tie proposed budget may be modified by city council. Th (C on 19 in bu fi es Si of - co po ` of 10 FI - TD Ci N WN i, WP l: a city hlas a two year contract with Community Transit Services Incorporated S), Har~dYtrans' operator, which was initiated on July 1, 1981 and expires June 3b, 1983. The maximum cost for contractual services with CTS for 2-83 will not exceed $207,080.00. This represents approximately an 8% rease dver this year's contract cost. An important part of the Handytrans .get for FY 1982-83 is continuation of the coordinated service agreements ~ng the City, Starlight Center and Regional Center. Although we have not alized'negotiations on the cost of this service for next fiscal year, we :imate 'that the cost of this service will be approximately $37,400.00. ice Regional Center will reimburse the City of Chula Vista the total cost Handytrans service to Regional Center clients attending Starlight Center, ~tinuation of this project as part of Handytrans service will have a ~itive jmpact on Handytrans performance indicators. Assuming continuation this project, Handytrans recovery ratio should increase from the current 5% to dbout 23% for next fiscal year. .CAL INTACT: The FY 1982-83 Handytrans budget is funded by Article 4.5 1 funds; Regional Center funds, and farebox revenue. The claim contains no ;y contribution for Handytrans operation. ;: dl/DT~05 ;0036T r~- ;~~~ - ~.~. ~_ _ .._ ..._,._W._._._ G,~~,: ~e„ ~, C~,,,~~~,-~ia ADIIVUAL TIIA CLAIM FORM FY 1982-83 A, ~~;~~; City of Chula Vista (HandYtrans) B. TYPE OF CLAIM: (check one) (' ) Article 4 - Support of Public Transportation System (PUC 99260) (' x ) Article 4.5 - Community Transit Services (PUC 99275) ( ) Article 8 - Multimodal Transportation Terminal (PUC 99400.5) Article 3 - Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities (PUC 99234) C. PIMOUNr OF CLAIM: Operations $197,520 Capital Planning Other Total $197,520 D. ~Or1DITI0N OF APPROVAL It is understood by this Claimant that payment of the claim is subject to approval by SANDAG and to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provision that such monies and the interest earned on such monies subsequent to allocation will be used only for those purposes for which the claim is approved and in accordance with the teens of the allocation instructions. E. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE/CONTACT (/ Si nature) 9 _ _ _ - --_ - _ _ W. J. Robens _ _ (Print or type name) Development Services Administrator (Title) 276 Fourth Avenue (Address) F . PAY~iF'~]'I' RECIPIENT City of Chula Vista (Claimant) 276 Fourth Avenue (Mailing Address) Chula Vista, CA 92010 (City and Zip Code) ATTENTION: Rene Franken, Chief Accountant (Name and Title) Chula Vista, CA 9201 575-5270 7~~1~~ ( Phone ) ( ~a~e signed ) st~rJry!~c usE o^it,r: 1. 1 a im t~; umr~e r 2. pate Approved 3. (tesolution N~u;;ber 4. .mount Approved for Payment 5. ~rount Approved for Reserve IF ~C{JIRED: 7 .G;~ to acprove~c3 by ~~1TD[3 8. ~;~B Resolution Nunti`~er 31 ~~L'~~~ SUMMARY OF REVENUES ANO EXPENDITURES FOR OPERATIONS AND CAPITAL PROJECTS ^jOperator Hand1'trans (City of Chula Vista) Date Completed: 3/15/82 FORM A•i0 Line 0 ERATINIG REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: Prior Year Act g~ FY._,. Current Year Projected FY 82 Next Year Proposed FY 83 Current to Next Year 9'o Change i Total Revenue from Operations $ 24,292 $ 36,860 $ 63,000 70.9 2 Total Operatin Support 226,849 235,306 197,520 16 3 Total Operating Revenue (add lines 1 & 2) 251 ,141 272 ,166 260, 520 (4.3 ) 4 Less: otal Operating Expenses Excluding Depreciation and Amortization 169,803 239,289 260,520 (8.9) 5 Net petting Surplus (Deficit) (deduct line 4 from line 3) 81 ,338* 32,877 0 CAPI AL FUND BALANCE SUMMARY 6 Begi Wing Capital Fund Balance 7 Total Capital i~unds Received I 8 S btotal (acid lines 6 & 7} 9 Less' Total Capital Expenditures 10 Endi g Capita Fund Balance (deduct line 9 from line 8} * Res rued far encumbrances 51,923 ~, 7 -~ -, I 139 ~~ SCHEDULE OF REVENUE PROVIDED FOR OPERATIONS FORM A_~p Operator: ~ HandYirans (City of Chula Vista) Date Completed: 3/15/82 Line Obje Class No. SOURCES OF REVENUE PROVIDED FOR OPERATIONS Prior Year Actua! FY 81 Current Year Projected FY 82 Next Year Proposed FY 83 Current to Next Year °.'oChange _ EVENU~ FROM OPERATIONS 18 621 20 100 23 000 14.4 1 401 assenger Fares For Transit Service- 9, 900 37 , 000 273.7 2 402 pecial Transit Fares 3 403 chool Bus Service Revenues 4 ~ 404 refight Tariffs 5 405 harter Service Revenues 6 407 on-Transportation Revenues 5 671 6,860 ~ 3,000 56.2) 7 oral Revenue From Operations 24,292 36,860 ~ 63,000 70.9 8 1409 OCAL CASH GRANTS & REIMBURSEMENTS _ ~9 DA Sales, Tax 181 220 183 383 ~ 197,520 7.7 10 oral Support (see instruction x31: City Subsidy 500 - - - ~1 Tran it Dem nstration Pro'ect Grant SB283 32,043 - - ~ - 12 DA Sales Tax -Brought Forward 13,086 81,338 ~ 32,877 I (59.6) 13 Less :. TDA dales Tax Refund ~ (29,415) (32,877) 14 oral Lodl Cash Grants & Reimbursements 226 ,849 235 , 306 197 , 520 (16 ) 15 411 TATE CASH GRANTS & REIMBURSEMENTS 16 tale Transit Assistance Fund 17 _ _ _ _ 18 _. 19 20 oral Stag Cash Grants & Reimbursements 21 1 413 EDERAI CASH GRANTS & REIMBURSEMENTS 22 ection 5 23 24 25 26 27 oral Federal Cash Grants & Reimbursements 28 0TH A FUNDS PROVIDED FOR OPERATIONS 29 ::0 31 oral Other Funds Provided for Operations 32 oral Ooeratina SuDAOrt (ADD ONES it, 20, n b Sit 226 ,841 235 , 306 197 , 520 I (16 ) 33 ~ I T LrUNC PRUVIGED rvn P RATIGNS IACD LINES 7 & 32t 251,141 I 272,166 I 260,520 I (4.3) /~~~~ 192 ~, N Q O Lt. N W Z W x W Z Q d W Q w I- U W "7 Q a Z Q J - Q V a 0 W J D w 2 U N M a~ G _ 0 U 'n C 7 J O O ~, • .. ~ ~ ~ ~ C'}' ~ N t.C) al m ~., ,~ ` X -- U N '' O n O Cp ~ a~ ~ ~ to O U Z a r ~~ ~ ~ O O M O O O ~' C] O O M ~ } X O l1 ~ d' O y r ' Z r d' N l0 N e~4 ~~ ~ ~ } ~~ O l!') O N Q1 r ~ pp y ~ } ^ N ` ~ ll. N r, n N 01 M = r U O yt} N N 6.. ~ O ~ J } O O ~t _ j Gt N r 1~ C 2~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~, CL "~ N M V ~ ~ r r r9 ~' ~ M O t [ r ".7 U r' . ) O t.C) r :J d' tD O ~" ~ O Ln dl lf) U «. ~ O ~ :~ ' ~ } N M „~,~ W ~~~' r n Ol O O CO '` W W ~ r ~ dl l0 r r ;_ _ _ _._ ~ d7 N ~ ~ ~ Z z ~ ~ - O V ~ ~ F- !- -1 ~ Q U N ` X Z n w0 ~ 'O N N~" O w ' c~ v ~ C w ~ N N y cn ~ - ~, a Z - ~ Q ~Z w ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ aw. ~ c a3' °- dS _ ~ :~ cn ~- ~ X C '~ Z X w `^ ~ i - H _ O G W _S C u ~ °~ ~„ a ~ ~ ~ c X w m ~ N ~ zQ Q =~ J ~c ~ ~~ ^ n ~ ~ ~ v C .~ ~ J C :n z~ i= O ~ v ~ ~- ~ _ ~ Q~ p ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~+ ~ ~ O ~ ~:. ~, C I .iJ .7 .~.. ~i I 7 V7 V lLJ In I n ' V7 O '"1 ~ ~ . r u :.7 ~ r I ~1 ~I ~I ~I ~ I ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~- ~- ~l ~) ~ ~~ ~~ ~ L I ^) M C b r c r C O C 3 O O 'C C7 ~ Q E N ~ ~ O p ~ •r C ~ .~ ~ $.~ a •~ ~, X ~ 3 m ~ ~ «. v H •r 7 ~ E L. v N ' \ u ~ > rti o +' N N J ~ ~ ~ V •r C ~ E '° ~ U \, ~ o N O ~ \ •r • * \, ~QS SCHEDULE OF ACTUAL AND PROJECTED RECEIPTS OF CAPITAL FUNDS Operator HandV'trans (City of Chula Vista) Date Completed: 3/15/82 Line SOURCES OF CAPITAL FUNDS Prior Year Actual FY_ Current Year Projected FY _ Next Year Proposed FY _ ( FE ERAL S URCES OF CAPITAL FUNDS 1 MTA Section 3 Grants 2 MTA Section 5 Grants - 3 ederal Aiid Urban Grants 4 5 I ~ . 6 7 I Total Federal Sources of Capital Funds ST TE SOURCES OF CAPITAL FUNDS g fate Transit Assistance Fund 9 10 11 ( ' Total State Sources of Capital Funds LO AL SOURCES OF CAPITAL FUNDS 12 DA-Loc+~l 13 ' 14 15 1B 17 18 Total Loc~f Sources of Capital Funds 19 No -~overnmlentaf Donations 2G T TAL C,~,P'ITAL FUNDS P,ECEIVED (add Ines 7, 11, 18 & 19) 147 /~~ ~~~ FORM A-22 NO TRANSACTIONS M' ' N Q ^ -~. .-1 W H Z - W O.. X W J Q ' ~ F- a ~ 1. U W ~ a ~ O a t,L --, O W ~ J ~..~ W 2 V i '.~ I J 1 O A a`~ t ~~ W Z 0 c o, U a .` U ~ til ~ ~ ~~ y ~ ~ C U ~ X l11 A ` ,W .C .~ 'Z~ C U } o LL 'o D W ~ ~ W w O ~, "~ V U C~ C~ ~ ~ c. x ~ ~ W Cif ~~ ~~~ ~ 4 N W %4 w ~~ ~ ~ ~I Q ~~ C wl r ~~ ~~ ~. a Q1 C C W •.. 67 a E 0 U _~ cp _- 149 ~ ~" O ~ ? ~ ... ~ LL Z ~ 'D c n ~~ G } JM C ~~O lL y •--} ~ ~ ~~ _^. G 'a v :~ y } - - ~ ~ ~ 1 a~ ~ p O ~ } ~ Q t L a C c x w co `~ \~ O cam" F- C~ ~, J' ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED BUDGET INCREASES Operato : HandYtrans (City of Chula Vista) 3/15/82 Date Comoleteri Ott A-: ~'-~~- • ~ For Fiscal June 30 Yoar Fnraor~ s ,198;. Line Item ~r Proposed °,'o Increase EXPENSE OBJECT CLASS EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED INCREASE 4 32.2 ' 503 Service Reflects cost of staff services which reviousl were charged mostly to SCOOT. This increase re resents a more accurate allocation of staff service char es between SCOOT and HandYtrans. 8 I 50 1505 Utilities HandYtrans' share of utilities char e. I 14 ~ 100 512 Leases & Rentals HandYtrans not charged for office space previously. I (This amount represents HandYtrans' share of this I ) cost. I I I i I I I I ~ W -- '~ ~I ~ t ~ i isl -~ ~,~~ ~ . STATEMENT OF EFFORTS MADE TO IMPLEMENT TPAC RECOMMENDATIONS I Operator: City of Chula Vista Date Completed: 3/9/82 ~- FORh'1 A~0 Pagel.of~, ~- Item u PAC RECOMMENDATION ACTION TAKEN TO IMPLEMENT RECOMMENDATION Me sures o!f Performance 1. ~ Fa ebox recover ratio Current and ro'ected recover rate is 10%. to equal ar exceed 10% 2. ~ Pa sen ers,/revenue mile Current and rojected assen ers/revenue mile is 0.35 to e ual or exceed 0.33 3. 0 ratin cost revenue mile Current 0 eratin Cost revenue mile is $2.34 and is to exceed',~2.78 ~ estimated to be $2.40 for all of FY 81-82. Co sidera ions 1. Ma 'ntain iaransfer agree- Implemented. me is with fixed route o rators. 2. De iation time of 90% of This re uirement is currentl exceeded. All icku s al appointed pickups should are within 20 minutes of appointment time. be within 20 minutes. 3. Ut ilize marketing programs Implemented. co sisteni; with goals and o 'ectives. 4. C operate with other Currently being done. ~ a encies bn consolidation e forts ar~d CTS evaluation s udies. ~ ~ ~) -io~a~ ~._, - C ~, ~- ~,~ 4:: ~., ~.~ I S.~ u~ ,. , ~, 4 ~ Yi ~~ ~. STATEMENT OF EFFORTS MADE TO IMPLEMENT PERFORMANCE AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS FORM A-~ Page1_o f_! Date of Last Operat r: Ci tv of Chula Vista Date Completed: 3/10/82 Performance Audit: PE~iFORMANCE AUDIT Item RIECOMMENDATION ACTION TAKEN TO IMPLEMENT RECOMMENDATION Performance Audit not yet conducted. .. .. ~ r/~~, 155 "' ~' - d m O LL. 1 J ~ 1 w r '... Z Q JN F- w z O a w I O Z CQ G W O N 1 U Gn J ~ Q 1 ~"' w J N Q l m O w J w J ] U N J I J N b s U O U C ~ O oN ~ n-r ~ ~ 1~ N ~ !~ ~O d' d- O t\ O O l0 N lp N 1,1J ~ ~ Q Cr LA M r M ~ ~' l!') Lt') r O r O N r O I I t 1 1 ~ ~ O O O , t ~ 00~ d' r r r ~ ~\ (f~ r f... Q1~ ~~ I ~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U I _ + E E - i- ~ - F- ~ ~ U U H U y ~ ~ N 'I ~ `~ ~ ~ N w _ O _ O a~ ,.., Q ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ aU.. ~ • ~ O y ~~ . ~U+ ? N v~ ~ ~~ 0 •C cc C ~ = C ~ 0 . C 'C C • ~ ~ i ' C C U ~ ~ .: r. O C E C C C G y ~ ~ O . ~ ~ O ~ O ~ C Q ! W ~ .. ~ C y LCJ ~ C'7 ~ q _ C • y ~ _ •~ Q] i y H ~ ~ C H .... O . ~ O O ~ C') E ~ O ~ N '-' ~ ~ c, ~ C C aCi ~ ~ w ~ O G C • C ' C tY~ ~ O ~ C L C r C ~ ~ ~ II i ~ ~ C.1 ~ ~ ' ~ Q > ~ Q a > O N ~ _ ~ _ ' ~ +_ ' +_ • ~ H ~ + . ~3 _ ~3 «. N a Q ~ I ~ .) ~ ~ ~ O ~ = ~ H H W C a >L -~ ~ N 3 N ~ of o h ?~ ~ `~ a] I~ L.. ~ G7 U U ` .~. U •('J ~. _ •~ CC G ~ ~ ~ + ~' N C N C h C N C ~ 7 • ~ ~ y ~ ~ U . c7 ~ CJ C ~ C ~ U ~ U C yy G ~ _ '~ L +U ~ Q ~ cCp (n G ~ G G C! ~ ~ Q ,~ ` Q ~ Q ~ Q ~ U ~ U ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ N 4. O CL 0 U ~ LL. O C m H ~~~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ N m CL N a~ CC N y CL ^+ O O _ _ _ > > ~c ~ . O ~i # # # # # Z c „ °vi ~ ~ ~ # # H # # O ~ O ~ O x o mZ C ' • ! • a ~ J ' N C"7 t7 In ca t~ CO O O ~ N ('7 ~ # V7 • O • t` • GD • C) M O t t N • C'7 i ~ t,7 C) V + .- .- ~ .- ,- N N N N N N O ~- Q ~~ ~ y O I~ Lt7 !~ Ol l0 O l0 I.,f) ~ = ..+ ~ C ~ ~ r r I~ ct M ~ M ~f ~ M O - O ^ ~p ~ ~ - W ~- N N M ~ O O O r ~ 1 I 1 11 ! O O 1 O E Qo cn ~- y 0 O C Q W C ~ CD N O E Qa cn - o ~' ° Q O w E ~ O M ~ ~ Q O N + C y O O C ~ !~ ~ IW C r 177 • ~ r N N I o CG ~,,, O °- W r6 Q Q QJ L O a a~ n C U N O M Z a `a c E C L a R C ro +-~ N •r U O U O O C r O ~ M ° cY• t\ ~f' t\ t~ ~ l0 lD O~ 1.57 Lt7 C'' N O O N l0 l0 I.f) t.f) { Lt7 l1') t\ O r- I I I I ~ W ~ O ' d' ~? lfl r O 5 M ' M r O C a. C O N ~ N L[ ) CAP r- d d' N ~ ~ O c 4 tR t. 4 _ ~ n F- ca c a c c c C :J ~ ~ ~ •~ O C c O © W ` O ` O ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ c' ~ ~ ~ • U _ `- 9 ~ y ~ ~ Q7 ~ ~ J O ~ v ~ H O ~ f O Z O 1 C G y ~ C7 U J ~ ~ ~ •~ _ ~ C ~ C C U C7 ~ 1, ~ U y v ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ? Cn ~ ~ ~ Cn ~ cn ~ C y c Q y ~ .r ~ «. W _ ~ 01 O .. ~ y _ ~ Q ,U ~ C7 C y y C W y -y y y ;j dl O U Q y Q ~ C ~ Q ~ C i ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ > m c > > ~ > > o Q H ~ v c9 ~ M 4 c_ . O y y ~ O > :~ L :J i. a~ N y a y ~ y J ~ a~ y ~ C° U CL ~ a a ~ ~ o cD c~ ~ > ~ > a. n ~ a a ~, a > a c > c c ~ • c y ~ ° H ~ ~, o C C C In ; W c~ c`~ i ~ :n v, O ~ N ~ y y ~ of ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ N ~ O p a~ ~ ~ cJ ~. :~ Q U U C > ~ m H C • in N V7 N Vf ',;•~ C7 U y C y H N y ~ y N y of y ~ (L ~ C y C y C Q7 ` y O N ~ N N y G 3 N ~ N ~ fn O N U I U U U U C .~ ~ :9 _ ~ ~` (~.7 _ ~ (LD ~ y y . •yr ~ ~ ~ N N N N c c c c c a n y ~ ?~ ?, ~ ~ ~'~-, o m m m t9 c, c c a c a c• O O ~ ~ a0i aCi i c y ° "' " ~ a ;~ ~ ` o a y z N ~ N ~ N ~ • _ a i a i ~ m y t G O ^ O G O G O ^~ O ^J Z ~J Z J > O m ~ m ~ tL O m y m :3 ~ ~ m ~ r ~ ~ O U ~ Q O m CL o 0 0 0 o I mZ C E .- N M w C' t,C) cD t` W t G7 O ~ f N C'7 ~ LLB CD (~ CO CA O •- N C'7 et lt7 J y ~ .- N N N N N N Ea 0 ~~ ~ ~ r\ ~ N d' N f~ ° LL7 L[7 L57 I~ G'1' H O M CO L~7 CC Gi' N CYO M Ol Ol M M lD ~' r r r O r 0 M O N r I..[7 (~ Ch CC 1 1 I I C M t57 d' 1,[) O O r r N N N O r I CO M CL~-- fR I (R (!} 64 t.4 ~ O .. H L O r. C O c CO C N C 4 C r~ i N ~ ~ .. J ' 1 J i3U ~- ,N .. cV i o Ca N ~ ~ 0 ~ LL :,7 1 W } J` L1 1"' Q r- j J a 1 ~ .r t^. K Y ~ _ - ~ W J1 • 1 I ~ ~ ~ .. r W a ~ t h mow.-,,-._.. E O o~ N o° UJ L O 00 0 0 O N C r ~ 1"' (p ~ ~ y ~ m ~ ~ - ' 7 ~ y ~ ! Q ^ N H ~ ~ U , H ~ O o o ti o ~, ~ Z ~, ~ ~ ti w '~ ~ ~ , ~ c `o U C E _ '~ _ ~ ~ Q ~ ' ~ ~ O ~ ~ O C • _ _ ~ ." ~ ~ O C .- C N ~ cw.. m ~3 ~3 .3 a ~ y ~ N y {~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ _ O Q ,l Q Q f'7 _ _ _ 7 ~ Q Q _ ~~pp p\ ` O` \ T mZ 1 • • # • • J E '' cJ n b G7 cJ N N N N ~ ~~ l ' C °~o N ~ = O r. ~ o ~ o N _ _ ~ C Q i ~ O O O ~ Ea ' rn r O C7 G o ~ O ~ ~ o w E _ ( CD ` N I~ ~ Q O C O C ~ (~ O C C a ,~_ 1C y o ~ E "' c~ IC 181 Page 32 4. HandYtrans Fares Cash fare $0.75 Book of 10-Ride tickets $6.75 Full-time attendant Free 5. Revenue Phi 1 es Summary FY80-81 FY 81-82 FY82-83 (Actual) (Estimated) (Projected) 84,769 87,150 92,000 6. Passenger Summar .~ r 1 v FY80-81 FY81-8?_ FY82-83 (Actual) (Estimated) (Projected) Rdvenue Passengers 25,828 28,830 31,500 Total Passengers 28,015 31,000 34,000 Transfer Passengers 0 0 0 7. Although free transfer tickets are issued and accepted on HandYtrans, only three passengers had requested transfers for use on the Trolley during the six-month period ending in December, 1981. To date, no transfer passengers have been carried on HandYtrans from the other D.A.R. or fixed route operators. HandYtrans, San Diego Dial-a-Ride, and !~lheels of National Ctiy have begun discussion of mutually convenient tranfer points td permit eligible users ease of transfer between these systems. 8. A certified copy of the City Council resolution authorizing the claim ar~d its basic purposes will be forwarded following the Council meeting of 4/06/82. 9. SCOOT staff who work on HandYtrans matters are participants in the City's PERS retirement system. x ~~~G~~~~ ', ~ ~l __--_- Y v Y r t r h Page 33 11. Fdre Revenue/Operatin Cost Compliance E3~quired ratio = 10% FY 1982-83 estimate: Ratio =fare revenue = $ 63,000 = 24 2% operating cost 260,520 12. Fund Eligibility as defined in CAC 6634 Claimant: HandYtrans (City of Chula Vista) FY 1982-83 a) Total FY 1982-83 operating costs X260,520 b) Less farebox revenue estimate 63,000 c) Total TDA support $197,520 /~'~~'~ _ . r REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ARTICLE 4.5 CLAIMANTS ERVIEW~OF HANDYTRANS OPERATIONS andYtrams is a specialized curb-to-curb transportation service for senior citizens nd handicapped persons. The service is provided within the City of Chula Vista nd portions of adjacent unincorporated areas for qualified persons who cannot se, or have difficulty using Chula Vista Transit, the fixed-route transit sys- em that serves the City of Chula Vista. Priority is given to trips for medical nd shopping purposes with secondary priority given to recreation and social rips. Approximately 50 percent of the person trips on HandYtrans are on a ubscription basis; it is estimated that this percentage will increase to over 0 percent as a result of a transportation services coordination project with the ssociation for Retarded Citizens of San Diego's (ARC) Starlight Center. This oordination project, which started in March, 1982, involves the City of Chula ista (HandYtrans), Starlight Center, and the Regional Center for the Develop- entally Disabled. Under this coordination project, the HandYtrans contract Aerator', Community Transit Services, Incorporated, will use two Starlight Center ehicles to transport a minimum of 31 Regional Center clients to and from Starlight enter on a daily basis, Monday through Friday. The Regional Center will reimburse he City of Chula Vista (HandYtrans) for the cost of this service which includes rivers' wages, fuel and maintenance costs. Prior to this service coordination roject, HandYtrans was serving Starlight Center with all three of its vehicles n a daily basis in the morning and afternoon. Under this new coordination rrangement, HandYtrans will continue to serve Starlight Center with two "regular" andYtra~ns vehicles in addition to the two Starlight Center vehicles. Therefore, ne Hand'Ytrans vehicle will be available to serve other qualified HandYtrans lients,during normal operating hours. Under this coordination project, HandYtrans ill increase the Regional Center clients transported to and from Starlight Center rom an~average of 25 a day to about 46 clients per day. These 46 clients will nclude 14 clients from National City, whc -have not received service on HandYtrans o Starlight Center prior to the start of this project. uirements That the proposed community transit service is responding to a transportation need currently not being met in the community of the claimant. Before the start of the Starlight Center coordination project, HandYtrans was transporting about 120 passengers daily. Included in this amount are 10 non- ambulatory persons and 25 mentally retarded adults. As indicated earlier, with the initiation of the Starlight Center coordination project, we have increased the number of retarded adults carried to about 46 per day. We also anticipate the total HandYtrans ridership will increase due not only to the Starlight Center service but also because one additional HandYtrans vehicle wi71 be available to transport eligible users who were not being served before the coordinated project began. In November, 1980, HandYtrans staff conducted an on-board survey of HandYtrans users. This survey indicated that the majority of riders had no alternative means of transportation, there- fort~e, HandYtrans seems to be serving an unmet need within its service area. ;~~%~'~~ -2- Tha the service shall be integrated with existing transit services if app'~ropriate. _- The City of Chula Vista participates in the Master Transfer Agreement with MTD~B. Therefore, the mechanism is in place to facilitate the transferring between fixed-route operators in the South Bay and HandYtrans. We have experienced some transferring between HandYtrans and San Diego Transit and betlween HandYtrans and the San Diego Trolley; although this transferring furnction is not very extensive due to the fact that most HandYtrans riders ha~re difficulty using fixed-route systems. That the claimant has an adequate management information evaluation pursuant to Section 99279. Han!dYtrans fulfills this requirement. That the claimant has prepared an estimate of revenues, operating costs patronage and a marketing program. HaridYtrans has fulfilled these requirements. A marketing program was initiated during FY 1980-81 to promote HandYtrans'use and to increase com- munity awareness of service available. I believe that this marketing effort hasp been instrumental in HandYtrans' steady ridership increase since service began in November, 1979. r Y w `1 v k That the claimant is in compliance with the applicable farebox recove ratio requirement. HandYtrans is in compliance with this requirement. valuation Criteria ~. Does the claimant propose to serve areas where accessible services are presently not provided? HandYtrans operates in the service area of Chula Vista Transit, the fixed- route system. Since CVT buses are not accessible, HandYtrans provides comparable, accessible service to the fixed-route system within its service area. ?. Is 'this service limited to those who are unable to use conventional fixed- ro~Ite services? An 'eligible HandYtrans'user must either be unable to use the conventional fixed-route system, CVT, or must show that use of the fixed-route system could only be done with difficulty. Therefore, HandYtrans' users are not lir~ited exclusively to those who are unable to use fixed-route system but we serve some individuals who have difficulty using the fixed-route system. ~~~~'~~ stem to facilitate -3- h v y -, v J 4 What types of trips are to be served by the claimant? Is priority given to essential medical shopping and work trips? HarldYtrans does give priority to serving medical shopping and school trips. Due to funding cutback, Southwestern College in Chula Vista stopped its dial-a-ride service for disabled students during the fall of 1981. HandY- trans has been carrying an average of eight Southwestern students daily and we hope to increase service to Southwestern students because of the additional capacity that is now available because of the coordination project with Starlight Center. To what extent is the proposed service coordinated with other transit services within the ro osed service area? Are transfers to fixed-route ac essible services encoura ed whenever ossible for lon er inter-communit~ trips? Phase see response to Item 2 under Requirements section. In addition, Chula Vista staff is currently working with the operator of the National City dial-a-ride system in order to establish a common transfer point between the two systems. Whit efforts have been made b the claimant to increase efficienc and of ectiveness? Has the potential of integration of taxicab services for those riders not requiring lift-equipped vehicles been thoroughly evaluated? The coordination project with Starlight Center should have a positive impact on HandYtrans efficiency and effectiveness. For example, I estimate that the total passengers carried for FY 1982-83 should increase by 25 percent or mode compared with FY 1981-82. I also estimate that, due to this coordination project, HandYtrans net cost per passenger should decrease by about six per- cent, and that our fare revenue to operating cost (recovery ratio) should - increase by about 100 percent. I have not evaluated, to date, the potential of using taxicab services for clients not requiring lift-equipped vehicles. I (have concentrated my efforts during FY 1981-82 on the coordinated transpor- tation service arrangement with Starlight Center. The development of this project has taken almost nine months. However, regarding the use of taxicabs, I would like to make the following comments. Many of our clients that use HandYtrans, while not requiring lift-equipped vehicles, are quite elderly and frail, and, I believe, require the special attention given them by HandYtrans' drivers. HandYtrans' drivers are thoroughly trained to the special and unique needs of many of our clients who because of their health require sensitivity and personal contact when being transported. It is my opinion that a taxicab operation would not provide this same level of service given by,HandYtrans. Whit ercenta e of the total trips carried are group or subscription type trips? Many to one ? What efforts have been made to increase the proportion of,group trips? Before the start of the Starlight Center coordination service, approximately 50 percent of the HandYtrans person trips were on a subscription basis. I estimate that during FY 82-83 this percentage will increase to about 63 per- ced~t due to the additional clients attending Starlight Center - all of whom will be on a subscription basis. „~ -4- a What percentage of total operating costs are being expended for administration? What efiforts have been made to reduce a ministrative overhead? Although it is difficult to determine administrative costs, particularly in the situation of HandYtrans, because there are so many factors that may be considered administrative costs, I estimate that during FY 1981-82 approxi- mately 32 percent of total operating costs are expended for administration. SAQJDAG concurs with this estimate in an evaluation of 4.5 operators published in June, 1981. SANDAL has set a "target" for HandYtrans for administrative costs during FY 1982-83 of 30 percent. Assuming the continuation of the Starlight Center coordination project throughout FY 1982-83, I estimate that HandYtrans administrative costs should be reduced to about 27 percent. tJhat percenta e of operating costs are recovered through the farebox? Before the start of the Starlight Center coordination service, HandYtrans wad recovering about 10.5 percent of its cost through the farebox. During FY'1982-83, it should be possible to recover about 23 percent of total operating costs through the farebox because 100 percent of the operating costs for' the Starlight service will be reimbursed to the City of Chula Vista by Regional Center. ~. Whit other local State, Federal or private funds in addition to TDA funds have been committed to the program? The Regional Center, a State funded agency, has committed about $9,900 to HandYtrans for the Starlight Center project during FY 1981-82. It is esti- mated that the cost of this service for FY 1982-83 will be about $37,500. An'~agreement for the continuation of this project for FY 1982-83 will be negotiated with Regional Center prior to June 30, 1982. _. To what extent is the service coordinated with other Social Service Agency transportation programs within the service area? In addition to Starlight Center, HandYtrans coordinates service with the Salvation Army in Chula Vista. rm s ~-ic~~~ V w