The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2010/12/14 Item 7 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~\ft-. ~llY OF .~ (HULA VISTA ITEM TITLE: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: DECEMBER 14, 2010, Item 7 REPORT REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE, PARK ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT FEE, AND TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR f,(, /or ?, If DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURJ;;R.f't DIRECTOR OF PU~. ~ ~ ' CITY MANAGER' :--- --1Y U. ASSISTANT CITY ANAGER ~ 4/STHS VOTE: YES D NO I X I SUMMARY State Government Code Section 66000 requires local agencies assessing Development Impact Fees (DIF) and sewer capacity charges to make available specified financial data to the public each fiscal year. These repOlis satisty that requirement and have been available in the City Clerk's otnce for public review since December 3, 2010. We have also included the report on Park Acquisition and Development (PAD) fees in the same report for ease of reference and convenience to the public. Local agencies are also required to make findings every five years for any DIF funds remaining unexpended that identifY the purpose of the fee and demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it was charged. This year, the City has not identitied unexpended fees that were on deposit for five or more years. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that filing of this annual report is not a "Project" as detined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change to the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the actions proposed are not subject to CEQA. Although environmental review is not necessary at this time, once projects that will be funded 7-1 DECEMBER 03,20 10, Item~ Page 2 of7 through the DlFs have been defined, environmental review will be required and a CEQA determination completed prior to commencing any projects. RECOMMENDATION Council accepts the report. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable. DISCUSSION The City of Chula Vista collects several types of Development Impact Fees (DIF), Park Acquisition and Development fee, and Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve fce, which were assessed during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. The major categories of facilities financed via DIF include transportation, traffic signals, pedestrian bridges, drainage, sewer, and public facilities. Development Impact Fees are updated in two manners, either via a comprehensive DIF program review, or via a Council enacted automatic annual adjustment, based upon an appropriate index. In October 01'2009, the following automatic index based annual adjustments went into effect: . Transportation DIF was readjusted from $11,836 to $11,317 per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). . Traffic Signal fee was increased from $29.75 to $30.73 per average daily vehicle trip. . Otay Ranch Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF was increased from $2,033 to $2,126 per single-family dwelling unit. . Park Acquisition and Development fee was increased from $9,428 to $9,574 for Areas West ofT-80S and $17,110 to $17,256 for Areas East ofT-80S . Western Transportation Development Impact Fee (WTDIF) was readjusted from $3,308 to $3,243 per single-family equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). Poggi Canyon Sewer DIF was comprehensively reviewed and updated in June 2009. The fee was reduced to $265 per EDU and took effect in FYIO. Other fees addressed in this report remain at the same rate as the previous tiscal year. DEVELOPMENT IMP ACT FEES TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (TDIF) This fee was adoptcd on January 12, 1988 by Ordinance 2251 to finance and coordinate the construction of new transportation facilities so that streets are built when needed. This fee is applicable to all new development east ofTnterstate 805. Prior to the program, streets were built by developers in a fragmented fashion with 6-lane facilities, necking down to 2-lanes and expanding back to 6 lanes again. In addition, there was a fairness issue since some developers fronted on large streets and others did not. Now all developers in the Eastern portion of Chula Vista pay the same fee per dwelling Unit and either the City constructs the street or a developer 7-2 DECEMBER 03,2010, Iteml Page 3 of7 does. If the developer constructs the street they will receive a TDIF fee credit when they apply for a building permit. The TDIF program was last comprehensively updated in 2005, increasing the fee per EDU to $10,050. This fee was subject to an annual index-based adjustment. In Jilllllary of2010 the City Council approved a resolution to reduce the TDIF to $11,317 per EDU. The fees for other land use types, as well as detailed FY 2009/10 financial information, are presented in Attaclunent A, Schedule I. WESTERN TRANSPORT A nON DEVELOPMENT IMP ACT FEE (WTDIF) This fee was adopted on March 18, 2008 by Ordinances 3106 to 3110 to finance and coordinate the construction of new transportation facilities on the west side of the City as well as spread the costs associated with the construction of the facilities equitably among the developing properties within the benefit area. This fee is applicable to all new development west of Interstate 805. This fee is subject to an annual index-based adjustment in July 1 of each year beginning in 2009. In January of 2010 the City Council approved a resolution to reduce the WTDIF to $3,243 per EDU. The fees for other land use types, as well as detailed FY 2009/10 financial information, are presented in Attaclunent A, Schedule 2. TRAFFIC SIGNAL FEE This fee was adopted to provide for the projected traffic signal needs of the City that result from increases in traffic volume caused by development. As funds are accumulated they are expended on traffic signal projects. This citywide fee is assessed per trip generated, and was increased from $29.75 to $30.73 per trip in October 2009. Detailed FY 2009/10 tinancial infol1nation is presented in Attaclunent A, Schedule 3. TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF This fee is applicable to all new development within the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin and has remained unchanged since 1998. Detailed FY 2009/10 financial information is presented in Attachment A. Schedule 4. TELEGRAPH CANYON GRAVITY SEWER DIF This fee is for the expansion of the trunk sewer within the basin for tributary properties. The fee has remained unchanged at $216.50 per EDU since 1998. Detailed FY 2009/10 tlnancial information is presented in Attaclunent A, Schedule 5. POGGI CANYON SEWER BASIN DEVELOPMENT IMP ACT FEE This fee was adopted to provide the necessary tlnancing to construct a trunk sewer in the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin from a proposed regional trunk sewer west of Interstate 805 along Olympic Parkway to the boundary of Eastlake. The fee was established at $400 per equivalent dwelling unit in 1997. In June of 2009, the Poggi Canyon was updated and the fee was reduced to $265 7-3 DECEMBER 03,2010, Item 7 Page 4 of 7 per EDU. This change went into effect in FYIO. Detailed FY 2009/10 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 5. SALT CREEK SEWER BASIN DEVELOPMENT IMP ACT FEE This fee was adopted to provide the necessary financing to construct the Salt Creek Interceptor. This fee is applicable to the Salt. Creek Sewer Basin, a portion of the Upper Otay Lake Basin nOlih of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, Wolf Canyon Basin, and a portion of the Lower Otay Lake Basin east of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin. The fee for FY 2009/10 was $1,330 per EDU under Ordinance 2974-A dated August 17, 2004. Detailed FY 2009/10 tinancial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 5. OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 1, 2, 5, & 6 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE This fee was adopted to provide the necessary financing to construct the facilities. The fee program was amended in February 2007 to include Otay Ranch Village 2. This action amended both the program's area of benefit and facility list. Construction costs were also revised and a new fee of $1,114 per EDU was established and has remained unchanged. Detailed FY 2009/1 0 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 6. OTA Y RANCH VILLAGE 11 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMP ACT FEE This fee was adopted to provide the necessary financing to construct four pedestrian bridges in Otay Ranch Village 11. This tee was increased from $2,033 to $2,126 per EDU in October of 2009. Detailed FY 2009/10 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 6. PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF The Public Facilities DIF is a citywide fee with several components levied to fund that portion of public facilities projects attributable to new development. The total fee for all components was increased in October 2008 from $8,136 to $8,735 per single-family EDU and has remained unchanged. Detailed FY 2009/10 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 7. The active components of the Public Facilities DIF with the current tees are as follows: ADMINISTRATION ($563) - Administration of the Public Facilities DIF program, overseeing of expenditures and revenues collected, preparation of updates, calculation of costs, etc. CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION ($2,458) - Expansion of the Civic Center per the 1989 Civic Center Master Plan to provide sufficient building space and parking due to growth and development. The Civic Center Master Plan was updated in July 2001 to include the Otay Ranch impacts. POLICE FACILITY ($1,565) - Accommodation of the building space needs per the Civic Center Master Plan, which included the newly constructed police facility, 7-4 DECEMBER 03, 2010, Iteml Page 5 on upgrading of the communications center and installation of new communication consoles. Also included is the purchase and installation of a computer aided dispatch system (CAD), Police Records Management System, and Mobile Data Terminals. CORPORATION YARD RELOCATION ($421) - Relocation of the City's Public Works Center from the bay front area to the more centrally located site on Maxwell Road. LIBRARIES ($1,413) - Improvements include constmction of the South Chula Vista library and Eastern Territories libraries, and installation of a new automated library system. This component is based on the updated Library Master Plan. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM ($1,243) - Projects include the relocation of Fire Stations 3 and 4, constmction of a fire training tower and classroom, purchase of a brush rig, installation of a radio communications tower and constmction of various fire stations in the Eastern section of the City. This fee also reflects the updated Fire Station Master Plan, which includes needs associated with the Otay Ranch development. MAJOR RECREATION FACILITIES ($1,072) - New component adopted in November 2002 to build major recreation facilities created by new development such as community centers, gymnasiums, swimming pools, and senior/teen centers. Although the majority of project costs are to be borne by new development, it is important to note that various components or specific projects within a component contain both a City and new development cost share. The City share often reflects "joint impetus" projects, which are necessitated by growth and non-growth factors and/or the City's obligation to correct pre- existing space/equipment deficiencies. The PFDIF fees only relate to new development's cost share for each component. PARK ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD) FEES This in-lieu fee was adopted by the City to acquire neighborhood and community parkland and to construct parks and recreational facilities. The Park Acquisition and Development fee was increased in October 2009 from $9,428 to $9,574 for Areas West of I-80S and $17,110 to $17,256 for Areas East of I-80S. Detailed FY 2009/10 financial information is presented on Attachment B. TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FEES This fee was established to pay all or part of the cost and expense to enlarge sewer facilities of the City so as to enhance efficiency of utilization and/or adequacy of sewer capacity. Detailed FY 2009/10 financial information is presented on Attachment C. 7-5 DECEMBER 03, 2010, Iteml Page 6 of7 FY 2009-10 FINANCIAL INFORMATION Attachment A, Schedules I through 6 reports the required financial information for all DIF, other than the Public Facilities DIF. Attachment A, Schedule 7 reports the required financial information for the Public Facilities DIF and its components. Attachment B reports the required financial intormation for the PAD fees. Attachment C reports the required infornlation for the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve fees. The schedules contain the following items: . The beginning balances as of July I, 2009. . The fees received during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. . Other miscellaneous revenues received during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. . The interest earned from investing the cash balances available in each fund during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. . The expenditures from each of the funds during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. . A description of each capital project with expenditures funded entirely or in part by DIF/PAD/Trunk Sewer in FY 2009/10 and the percentage of the project funded by this fee through FY 2009/10. More detailed information on any project is available in the annual Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Budget. . Information on any loans from DIF/P AD/Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve funds during FY 2009/10. . The ending balances as of June 30, 2010 for each of the DIF/PAD/Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Funds. . The amount, description and purpose of the fee. . An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence. The ending balances as of June 30, 2010 are in the process of being audited as part ofthe audit of citywide financial statements, and are theretore subject to adjustment. FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR FUNDS IN POSSESSION OVER 5 YEARS Government Code Section 6600 I (d) requires the local agency to make findings every five years with respect to any portion of the DIF fees remaining unexpended to identify the purpose for which it was charged. There are no funds currently on account remaining unexpended for five or more years, therefore no additional finding is necessary. Copies of this report were sent to the Building Industry Association of San Diego, the Eastlake Development Company, the McMillin Companies, the Otay Ranch Company, the Otay Land Company, Trimark Pacific Homes and Brookfield Homes. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has determined that the action contemplated by this item is ministerial, secretarial, manual, or clerical in nature and does not require the City Council members to make or participate in 7-6 DECEMBER 03, 2010, Item-1~ Page 7 on making a governmental decision, pursuant to California Code of Regulations section l8702.4(a). Consequently, this item does not present a conflict under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code S 87100, et seq.). CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT This is an informational report and there IS no fiscal impact associated with accepting or rej ecting this report. ON GOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact in future years. ATTACHMENTS A. Schedules 1 through 7: FY 2009-10 Financial Information lor all DIFs including Public Facilities DIF B. FY 2009-10 Financial Information for PAD fees C. FY2009-10 Financial Information for Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve fees Prepared by: Karim Galeana. Senior Accountant, Finance Department 7-7 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 1 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDIF) FY 09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Description of Fee: To finance the construction of traffic and transportation improvements in support of future development. Amount of the Fee: $ 11,836 9,469 7,102 189,376 94,700 per single family equivalent dwelling unit detached per single family equivalent dwelling unit attached (med density) per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit per general commercial gross acre per Industrial gross acre FY 09/10 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 591 ..... TRANSPORTATION DIF I co Beginning Balance, 07/01/09 $ 24,393,651 TDIF Fees Collected 477,080 Transportation State Share Interest Earned 353,827 Miscellaneous Revenues Forgiveness of debt Transfer-In 1,402,000 Expenditures: Supplies & Services (38,483) City Staff Services (194,993) SR-125 DIF Refunds (2007-182) Debt Payment - Calease Fiscal Sys Transfer-Out - 2003 Refunding COP CIP Project Expenditures (676,351) Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/10 $ 25,716,731 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 1.1 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDlFJ FY 09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 09/10 CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT Total Appropriation Future % Of Project Initially PROJECT . DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES as of 6130/1 0 Appropriations Funded by TDIF Scheduled OP200 Automation - AutoCAD Upgrade $ 145 5,000 11.00% 2010 OP206 Surevey Monument Preservation Replacement 15,000 15,000 9.29% 20101 OP208 CIP Mngmnt & Equipment Purchase 18,844 75,000 48.94% 2009 STL261 . Willow St Bridge Widening 15,340 1,087,740 9.62% 1999 STM331 98 E. Orange Extension 17,558 4,459,904 99.47% 1999 STM346 Interim SR-125 Facility Phase I 1,343 196,572 35.00% 2003 ..... STM350 South Circulation Network 155,000 100.00% 2003 I STM351 Ma n St Dual Left Turn Ln-180 2,214,117 100.00% 2002 CD STM355 Otay Lakes Road Widening, East H to Canyon 438,484 3,900,000 100.00% 2003 STM356 Ramp Widening on E. H St and 1-805 Northbound 72 2,901,145 98.74% 2004 STM357 Rock Mtn Rd - Heritage to La Media 232,000 91.23% 2004 STM359 Rock Mtn Rd - SR125 Overpass 9,721 300,000 100.00% 2010 STM364 Heritage Road Bridge Reconstrc 76,925 1,820,000 52.00% 2007 TF274 Traffic Count Stalions 47,707 420,000 100.00% 2002 TF325 Transportation Planning Program 19,733 220,000 69.00% 2007 TF355 1805 Corridor Imprv. Arterial Ops 9.401 50,000 66.70% 2010 TF357 SR125 Corridor and Arterial Ops 297 50,000 100.00% 2007 TF364 TDIF (Trans Dev Impact Fund) Update 5,781 125,000 100.00% 2007 TOTAL CiP EXPENDITURES $ 676,351 SCHEDULE 1.2 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDIF) FY 09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Descriotion of Loan Advance to Western Transportation DIF approved via Council approved FY09 budget Advance to PFDIF (General Administration) approved by Council Resolution #2008-300 on December 16, 2008 Advance to PFDIF (General Admin!straUon) approved by Council Resolution #2009-137 on June 9, 2009 -..j I ~ o Loan Amount 180,000 5,200,000 5,300,000 ATTACHMENT A Interest Rate 2.402% 3.80% 0.56% -..J I ~ ~ ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 2 WESTERN TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDIF) FY 09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Amount of the Fee: $ Description of Fee: To finance the construction of traffic and transportation improvements in support of future development. 3,308 2,656 1,985 66,157 198,472 per sln91e famiiy equivalent dwellin9 unit detached per single famiiy equivalent dweillng unit attached (med density) per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit per regional commercial gross acre per high rise office gross acre FY 09/10 FUND BALANCE INFORMATiON: Beginning Balance, 07101/09 WTDIF Fees Collected I nterest Earned Transfer-In Expenditures: Supplies & Services City Staff Services CIP Project Expenditures Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30110 FY 09/10 CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT DESCRIPTION STL349 UC Bike PathlPed Accss Std 3rd TF363 Western TDIF Bay/rant Update TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES FUND 593 WESTERN TRANSPORTATION DIF $ 159,509 28,343 4,313 (1,950) $ 190,215 PROJECT Total Appropriation Future % Of Project Initially EXPENDITURES as of 6/30/10 Appropriations Funded by TDIF Scheduled $ 923 55,000 20.00% 2009 1.027 125,000 100.00% 2009 $ 1,950 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY 09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Description of Fee: For City's traffic signal needs resulting from increased traffic volume caused by new development. Amount of the Fee: $ 30.73 pertrip FY 08/09 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 225 TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUND Beginning Balance, 07/01/09 $ 3,905,785 --l I .... !'oJ TraffiC Signal Fees Collected Federal Grant Interest Earned Miscellaneous Revenues Transfer-In Expenditures: City Staff Services , Other Refunds Transfer-Out - 2003 Refunding COP CIP Project Expenditures 113,132 80,473 (3,896) (16,990) Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/10 $ (374,645) 3,703,859 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 3.1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY 09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 09/10 elP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT Total Appropriation Future % Of Project Funded Initiaily PROJECT DESCRIPTiON EXPENDiTURES as of 6/30/1 0 Appropriations by Traffic Signai DIF Scheduied OP206 Surevey Monument Preservation Replacement $ 145 2,000 5,000 4.58% 2010 OP208 CIP Mngmnt & Equipment Purchase 2,613 35,000 19.44% 2009 TF300 Traffic Signal ins~ Hiiltop / Oxford 654 449,401 100.00% 2003 ..... TF316 Signal Instailation-2nd & Quintard 1,040 40,000 100.00% 2003 I TF317 Inlers Impvt-Bonita Rd & Allen School Lane 180,309 100.00% 2004 ~ W TF330 Traffic Modificalion 4th / Main & 4th / Beyer 55,767 627,000 100.00% 2006 TF331 Traffic Modifica~on 3rd / Montgomery 87,429 390,000 56.52% 2006 TF334 Traffic Signallnslal Otay Lakes Elementary 164 240,000 100.00% 2010 TF335 Traffic Signallnslallation Brandyw'ne & Sequoia 309,201 100.00% 2007 TF337 Traffic Left Turn Modification Program 8,128 476,649 100.00% 2006 TF347 School Crosswalk Enhancement Colorado/Naples 16,119 40,000 100.00% 2008 TF348 Accessible Pedestrian Signal Facilities Upgrade 61,889 151,757 65.78% 2008 TF349 TraffiC Signal Modification 1 st Ave. E SI. Interseclion 115,491 370,000 190,000 100.00% 2008 TF354 Traffic Congestion Relief Program 6,378 55,000 20.00% 2008 TF355 1805 Corridor Improvement Arterial Ops 9,402 25,000 33.33% 2008 TF360 Hwy Safety Imprv Prog Mjr Intr 1,316 162,090 300,000 15.25% 2009 TF366 Trafc Sgnl & Stlight Upgrd/Mtn 50 255,913 41.89% 2009. TF369 Three Park Bicycle Fac Improv 6,866 11,000 7.00% 2009 TF370 Traffic SIgnalln51al Albany & Orange 742 145,000 205,000 100.00% 2010 TF371 Traffic Modification Hilltop Dr & Main Street 452 250,000 100.00% 2010 TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES $ 374,645 ...... I ~ "'" SCHEDULE 4 TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF (TC DRAINAGE DIF) FY 09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ATTACHMENT A Description of Fee: For construction of Telegraph Canyon channel between Paseo Ladera and the Eastlake Business Center and for a portion of the channel west of 1-805. Amount of the Fee: $ 4,579 per acre FY 09/1 0 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: . Beginning Balance, 07/01/09 Te Drainage Fees Collected Interest Earned Transfer-In Expenditures: Debt Service Payment to 03 Refundin9 COP CIP Project Expenditures Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/10 FY 09/10 CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT EXPENDITURES Total Appropriation as of 6/3011 0 FUND 542 TC DRAINAGE DlF $ 5,918,308 $ 125,423 (36,700) 6,007,031 Future Appropriations % Of Project Funded by DIF Initially Scheduled DR118 DR167 DR182 DR183 94 Telegraph Canyon Channellmpvls $ Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study Third & L Telegraph Canyon Channel Improvement K-1st Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES $ 5,073 11,917 9,005 10,705 36,700 3,919,026 1,251,000 950,000 300,000 700,000 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 1994 2006 2010 2010 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 5 SEWER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY 09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer DIF (TC Gravity Sewer DIF) Fund 431 Pumped Sewer DIF (Pumped Sewer DIF) Fund 543 Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin DIF (PC Sewer Basin DIF) Fund 432 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF (SC Sewer Basin DIF) Fund 433 Description of Fee: Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer DIF: Pumped Sewer DIF: .... I ~ Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF: Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin DIF: For the expansion of trunk sewer within the basin for tributary properties, For construction of facilities necessary to provide sewer service to developments within the pumped flow basin, For the planning, design, construction andlor financing of the facilities, For the construction of a trunk sewer in the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin from a proposed regional trunk sewer west of 1-805 along Olympic Parkway to the boundary of Eastlake. U1 Amount of the fee: Fund 431 Fund 432 Fund 433 TC Gravity PC Sewer SC Sewer Sewer DIF Basin DIF Basin DIF per single family equivalent dwelling unit detached $ 216,50 $ 400,00 S 1,330,00 per single family equivalent dwelling unit attached 216.50 400,00 1,330,00 per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit 162,38 300,00 997,50 Commercial land use $216.50/edu $400/edu $1330/edu Industrial land use $216,50/edu $400/edu $1330/edu SCHEDULE 5.1 SEWER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY 09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 09/10 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: ..... I ~ Beginning Balance: 07/01109 DIF Fees Collected Interest Earned Transfer-In Expenditures: City Staff Services Depreciation Expense - Infrastructure Oakwood Development Refunds (2008-261 & 2009-00: Interest Paid Transfer Out to Fund 413 Transfer Debt Service CIP Project Expenditures m Unaudited Ending Balance, 06130/10 FY 09/10 CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Fund 432- Ponni Canyon Sewer Basin DIF SW226 ' Upgrade-Reach 205 of Poggi Cyn Tnk Sew $ TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES Fund 431 Fund 432 Fund 433 TC Gravity PC Sewer SC Sewer Sewer DIF Basin DI F Basin DIF $ 3,283,344 $ 1,959,636 $ 1,598,289 13,661 152,641 22,677 39,534 115,782 (1,234) (1,385) (60,000) (62,927) (250,000) (472) $ 3,246,021 $ 2,011,597 $ 1,551,928 PROJECT Total Appropriation EXPENDITURES as of 6/30/10 Future Appropriations 472 582,291 s 472 ATTACHMENT A % Of Project Funded Initially by DIF Scheduled 29.10% 2002 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 6 DTAY RANCH PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FY 09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Otay Ranch Village 1, 2, 5 & 6 Pedestrian Bridge DIF (OR Vii 1 & 5 Pedestrian Bridge DIF), Fund 587 Otay Ranch Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF (OR Vii 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF), Fund 588 Description of Fee: OR Village 1 & 5 Pedestrian Bridge DIF: To finance the construction of pedestrian bridge improvement between Otay Ranch Villages 1, 5 & 6. OR Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF: To finance the construction of pedestrian bridge improvement in Otay Ranch Village 11. Amount of the fee: -.I I ~ Fund 587 OR Village 1, 2, 5 & 6 Ped Bridge DIF Fund 588 OR Village 11 Ped Bridge DIF -.I per single family equivalent dwelling unit detache $ per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit $ 1,114.00 $ 826.00 $ 2,126.00 1,579.00 FY 09/10 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 587 FUND 588 OTAY RANCH DIF OTAY RANCH DIF Beginning Balance, 07/01/09 $ 197 $ 2,217,227 DIF Fees Collected 11,123 111,799 Interest Earned 94 48,017 Otay Parkway Ped. Bridge (2008-102) City Staff Services (294) (1,053) Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/10 $ 11,120 $ 2,375,990 SCHEDULE 7 PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (PFDIF) FY 09/10 STATEMENT OF FUND BALANCE Description of Fee and amount Admlstrallon ($563) _ Administration of the Public Facilities DIF program, overseei,'lg of expenditures and revenues collected, preparation of updates, calculation of costs, etc. Civic Center Expansion ($2,458) _ Expansion of the 1989 Civic Center per the Civic Center Master Plan to provide sufficient building space and parking due to growth and development. The Civic Center Master Plan wa.s updated in July 2001 to inc ude the Olay Ranch impacts. Police Facility ($1 ,565) - Accommodation of the building space needs per the Civic Center rJlaster Plan, which inciuded the neWly constructed police facility, upgrading of the communications center and installation of new communication consoles. Also included is the purchase andinstullation of a computer aided dispatch system (CAD), Police Records Management System, and Mobile Data Terminals. Corporation Yard Relocation ($421) . Relocation of tile City's Public Works Center from the bay front area to the mare centrally located site on Maxwell Road. libraries ($1,413) _ Improvements indude construction of the South Chula Vista library and Eastern Territories libraries, and installation of a new automated library system. This component is based on the updated Library Master Plan. Fire Suppression System ($1,243) _ Projects include the relocation of Fire Stations #3 & #4, construction of a fire training tower and classroom, purchase of a bn..sh rig, installation of a radio communications tower and construction of various fire stations in the Eastern section of the City. This fee also reflects the updatod Fire Station Master Plan, which includes needs aSSOCiated with the Otay Ranch development. Major Recreation Facilities ($1,072) - New component adopted in November 2002 to build major recreation facilities created by new development such as community centers, gymnasiums} swImming pools, and senior/teen centers. ...... I ~ co Beginning Balance, 07/01/09 Revenues; DIF Revenue~ Investment Eamings OtllerRevenue Reimbursement_OlhAgencies Transfer In Expenr.l1tures: Personnel Ser\licesTolaJ Supplies & Ser\l:ce~ City Staff Services Other Refunds Capital Expenditures CIP Projecl Expenditures TranslerOul Police Corp Yard FimSupp. Ree. Gen.Actmln. Civle Center (1) Fac ~tl ReloCil~on Libraries System Faclltias 571 5671572 573 574 575 575 582 TOTAL $ 2,655,487 $ 10,352,154 $ (805,063) $ 3,172,910 $ 8,127,644 $(17,882,327) 1(8,494,319) $ (873,514) 188,201 252,585 168,308 44,634 256,919 357,868 341,558 1,610,073 70,530 203,284 (30,2tfl) 57,569 178,267 (300,281) (126,379) 50,703 8,3213 59 8,385 8,300,000 5,300,000 (8,210) (2,416,898) (B,Z10) (4,095,429) (1,660,228) (918,303) NOTE: Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/1 $ 2,914,218 $ 8,382,915 $ (2,327,270) $ 2,356,810 $ 8,560,630 $(12,516,414) $(6,279,OB1) $ 1,092,008 .(1) This fund includes the amount set aside for the acquisition of the Adamo property in Fund 567. Transfer In of $1.528M is an andvance from the General Fund FY 09/10 PFDIF CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT Total Appropriation Future % of Project Funded Initially EXPENDITURES as of 6/30/1 0 Appropriations by PFDIF Scheduled CtvtC CENTER EXPANSION - Fund 5671572 GG300 Civic Center Expansion Project Phase III SCHEDULE 7.1 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF (PFDIF) FY 09/10 SCHEDULE OF DETAILED EXPENDITURES ATTACHMENT A 6,210 11,467,265 $ 8,210 TOTAL EXPENDITURES-CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION ..... LOANS: I -' CO 100.00% 2006 ATTACHMENT B PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD FEES) FY 09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Description of Fee: In lieu fee for providing neighborhood community park and recreationa/Jacilities. Areas East of 1-805 Amount of the Fee: $ 17,256 per single family dwelling unit 12,806 per multi-family dwelling unit 8,076 per mobile home dwelling unit 7,382 permotel/hotel dwelling unit Areas West of 1-805 Amount of the Fee: $ 9,574 per single family dwelling unit 7,105 per multi-family dwelling unit 4,481 per mobile home dwelling unit 4,095 per motel/hotel dwelling unit -.I I f',) C) FY 09/10 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 715 PAD FUND Beginning Balance, 07/01/09 $ 35,463,812 Revenues: Park Dedication Fees Interest Earned Miscellaneous Revenues Expenditures: Supplies and Services Other Expenses CIP Project Expenditures 4,772 697,797 5,113 (4,571,795) Unaudited Endin9 Balance, 06/30/10 $ 31,599,699 ..,J I N -' PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD FEES) FY 09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 09/10 CIP EXPENDITURES: PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT Total Appropriation Future EXPENDITURES at 6/30/10 Appropriations % Of Project Funded by PAD Fees ATTACHMENT B.1 Initially Scheduled PR260 PR261 PR279 PR303 San Miguel Ranch Community Park Otay Ranch Community Park All Seasons park Sunset View Park Roller Hockey Rink Modf TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 3,113,951 60,348 1,391,521 5,975 4,571,795 450,541 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Note: The ending balance includes fees paid by specific developers for specific parks within those development These parks include Sail Creek Park, Montevalle Park, Mt Miguel Park, Mountain Hawk, and the Otay Ranch Community Park. 8,959,785 697,764 2,449,459 150,000 2007 2009 2007 2009 ..... I N N TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FY09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Description of Fee: For the eniargement of sewer facilities of the City so as to enhance efficiency of utiiization and/or adequacy of capacity and for planning and/or evaluating any future proposals for area wide sewage treatment and or water reclamation systems or facilities. Amount of the Fee: $ 3,478 per equivalent dwelling unit of flow when developing or modifying use of any residential property FY 09110 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: FUND 413 TRUNK SEWER (TS) Beginning Balance, 07101109 Interest Earned Developer Infrastructure Donations Sewerage Facility Participant Fees Transfer In Expenditures: Depreciation Expense R Infrastructure CIP Project Expenditures $ 178,252,673 1,080,607 8,736,488 1,285,947 (5,097,261) (68,375) Unaudited Ending Balance, 06130/10 , $ 184,190,079 ATTACHMENT C ATTACHMENT C.1 TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FY09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FY 09/10 EXPENDITURES: PROJECT Total Approp. Future ,~ OfPr~ectFunded Inilially PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES at 6/30/1 0 Appropriations by TRUNK SEWER Scheduled SW219 99/SIt Creek Trunk Sewer Constructior 706,679 20.00% 1999 SW223 Wastewater Master Plan 223 65,940 100.00% 2001 SW233 Moss Street Woodlawn to Broadway 4,315 284,998 25.70% 2007 SW234 Sewer Improvement Coiorado J & K 965,883 100.00% 2004 SW235 Main 'SI. Sewer Hilltop - Fresno 5,302 86,459 100.00% 2004 SW258 Sewer Capacity Analysis 58,343 246,421 100.00% 2007 -..J SW261 Industrial Blvd & Main Cap Enhance 192 140,000 100.00% 2010 I TOTAl. EXPENDITURES $ 68,375 N W --I I N .j:> LOANS: TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FY09110 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Descriotion of Loan Outstanding Loan Amount Loan to Oxford 51. A097-1lmprovement Fund, approved by Council Resolution #18795 011 October 28, 1997 3,826 Loan to Twin Oaks Ave AD96-1, approved by Councit Resolution #18873 on January 20, 1998 Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by Council Resolution #18996 on May 19, 1998 507,739 Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by Council Resolution #19078 on July 16, 1999 for project OR140 (Storm Drain Repair-Orange) 58,855 Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by Council Resolution #19607 on Nov. 24, 1999 for project DR 147 (CMP Storm Drain Replacement) 228,701 Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by Council Resolution #19682 on Jan. 19,2000 81,538 Advance to Salt Creek Sewer OIF approved by Council Resolullon #2001-203 on June 19,2001 10,320,343 Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved by Council Resolution #2002-222 on June 18,2002 1,894,547 ATTACHMENT C.2 Interest Rate 7.00% 7.00% 6.07% 5.90% 5.88% 5.88% 5.88% 5.34% -.J I N 01 LOANS: ATIACHMENT C.3 TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FY09/10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES DescriDtlon of Loan Outstanding Loan Amount Interest Rate 2,881,986 1.90% 1,094,531 1.50% $ 17,072,065 Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved by Council Resolution #2002.297 on August 13, 2002 Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved by Council Resolution #2003-278 on June 17,2003 Total