HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1989-15297 Revised 9/14/89
RESOLUTION NO. 15297
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM FOR EIR-89-6, SALT CREEK I
The City Council of the City Of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, recent State Legislation (AB 3180) requires
that public agencies adopt Mitigation Monitoring Programs to
insure the implementation of Mitigation Measures identified in an
EIR Or Mitigated Negative Declaration, and
WHEREAS, attached is the Mitigation Monitoring Program
prepared Dy ERC Environmental and Energy Services Company for the
Salt Creek I project, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended the
adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereDy adopt the Mitigation
~lonitoring Program for Salt Creek I PCM-89-9 and PCS-89-9
;ached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set
~rth in full. ~
Presented by Approved as to form by
~ ' ~, ' /Thbmas J.~ron, City Attorney
6212a
Resolution 15297
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, this 12th day of September, 1989 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Moore, Nader, Cox
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: Malcolm, McCandliss
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None
G ' Cox, Mayor'
ATTEST
everlye. A~tbelet, City (l~rk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 15297 was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 12th day of
September, 1989.
Executed this 12th day of September,1989.
' Bever y/A. u e e , ity 1K~erk
d~ - lS~ct 7
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM -'
pr~ared for the City o." Chula Vista for thc Salt
Creek I project pro]ca to comply With AB 3180;'wifich requh-es public aSencics to adopt such
:~,,.pro~..~m~"to ens~r~'i~ffe~t~ihi~l~ntatlO~i of mitigation measures.. Thc following
px~i;ram ts a hines;oat f~;a~'Ully deVelSp~d mitigation monitoring plan that will allow the
City of ChUla VIsta i~'a~cc'~-m'i'eiy c;~,alu~te the proposed prOject. The pmgr=n includes:
','. ~ is located in the northern portion of the EastLake l Sectional Planning Area (SPA) in'the ~'~
:ro~l!~s hills of eastern ClulS'Vlsta.:~j. The property lies approximately 8 mtles east of
s north of the US/Mexican border.
Center borderhE to the ..
proposed -qalt Cr~elC'Ranohl'stte' to'the east, lend undeveloped hills to the north.
~ The EastLake (3reen~s'.~P)K ~a~farther t~the 10'Uth; and the r~mainder ol Chula Vista and
· ' ~astL~ r~sld~iili~l ";i~sii~)'nh%~l~ l{~'l'ar~'~'thc west and south
!.; .'j iThe property is wtthin'CtW of Chula Vlsta'hicorporiiied b0Undarles. County ot~an Diego
"~': '~.[urlsdlctlon borders to the stte's norlh and eas~ these mas are within Chula Vista*s .~pher~
~'~',!" ~Of lnfiuence. ThS site'S' SouthweSt boundar~ Is thS pmpoia aligmnent of the futur~ State
', !~!~i: Rout~ (SR) 1LS Fre~.'e`xtenSi0~; the' Sits ii'bls~ted 1~ the proposed extension of East
· i~i'i'. "rI" -~et which runs tn'a ~ouihwest to east/no~ust dlr~=tton through th~ site towards
· the S ah C
"-.. reek Ranch property. '
!'~3 3180 r~clu~"~s monitoring of only those impacts identified as si~nlftcant or potentially
hificant; the monitoring program for Salt Creek I therefore addresses the followin~
"A~s~hefi~sA'lsual Qualip/
I '.~,.~, .,~
~=~:~BIoIo~C~R~b~sT,,.::~ :, ~r,.~. ,~: :..
~ . ,~ -- . ,:,,~
.... pZ~,
.~,
have bc~
rS n ~c~}si~n~, managora t shill with demons~t~d ,
e~ence h w~g und. ~ng field c~t~ces; '~:',/,' ~ ,:. :.~,,
,~' ~owl~ge'~e ~es or~am~t~ t pacts as~ated ~ cons~cdon
ofcost-effecdve midga~on opdons; ~ :if'
~cllcntc~icado~ ~lls.
r~onsibHid. of the MCC ~u~h~ut ~c monito~g effoa include ~c foHow~8:
Admlnis~don and prep~u~on of daily IoF,mtus .pon~, compliance rcpom
~d ~e f~ eons~don monit~ng ~n.
~ats~ be~j~ the CI~, ~e applicant, ~d ~e applicant's conictots.
Monit~ng o~ ~nsitc. dny-to.d~y cQns~ction ac~vhles; Inclu~ng ~e d~cc~on ', ~. ":
ntal monlto~ ~Ms) and envlronmcntM specia~st ~$s) In the
'Understanding o~ all permit conditions, site*specific project requirements
cons~cdon schedules ~d cnv~nmenta qu~l~ con~l cffom .
- L:
--~: ;- . ,.:., . -..-
eon~ac,o~ ~wled~ of ~d' ~umpliance with all appropriate
condiaonl ~ ~at ~nt ~s~e ~ ~n~wul condition~
': M~t~ce of ~mpt and ~la~ communication ~t~ ~e onsite ~MI ud
~d ,Sgt ~ck I p~sonncl ~sponsibla for connct~ peff~co and
~ of ~e $~: co~don~ con~
~o~Ctl~h's~hedules ind ~o~ss and ~y special mtaSation
b) Anlst ~8 MCC and S~t ~eek I cons~c~on con~acto~ In c~lnadnS GW ,,~ ;";
.-
. :,'.. ~ ........- . .~
ud Salt C~ek I, ~d usist ~e ':L,: ~-
Specialists is to proYlde expertise when
en~m~t~iy sensl~ve issues ~r, ud ~ p~i~ ~ction for ~gation,
any cox~{~rHon activities, meetlnls should, t~m place vetween all the parties
lnvolv~ to ~aa[e the reuniting pw~ and es~blish the .sponsibilhy ud autodry of
U$I harm a o{~ understanding of the mh{gadon measles as u~p~cd and "'
'sheS~1 mtst~ons Must 3 l ~o ~hn par~clpa~s of the mo~ng e~'orc ~os~
~ld ~ ~*~l~st ~ a~ ~ ~ttgadon mcasu~ adopt~ b~ ~o CI~ wo~d incl~do
Ci~ ~f,~ula ,Vl~ ~vl~nmentab R~sources .CouSinstot, the MCC and
~n~'~On~ ~p~... ~c MCC would ~s~butc to each cn~on~n~ spc~sl
Df ~tiKa~on musu~s that pertain to ~s or h~
lmpl~en~ In..~dra~ '~' ~ Bsi"of mlflga~ons~. ~ monitors ~I1 havo compliuco
~p~ f~s ~h~Z~on ~n out on ~o ~ or ~o f~. B~low ~
..... "~"' "' ~ 'm~nh~ shall ~ompl~ ~e '~n [~ and ~1~ it with ~e
M~ fo~o~Z '~e~ m~ffito~nS ac~ty. ~ MCC ~ ~en tnclud~ ~ conclusions or
~O~.fa,,~to ~nin~m Ud ~n~ co~hcndvc cons~cflon ~p~ to b~ submht~
~ls ~pOn ~ dcs~bo to major acc~pllshmcnts of
p~bl~m'S on~unt~d in achic~nZ ~o ~s or ~6
~blcms ~and p~vldo s list of
n h o .
~ ~r ~:mOnt~. 'W kly~o thly
~ ce n ons
~g (L6,, m~o~d~ .~l~phOn, logs. l~t~s).
followin[ text tnclud~s S Su~ of ~ho proj~c~ impacts, a list of all ass~tat~
~fl~a~on mea~s ~d ~ monh~ng ~ffo~s n~dcd ~ cnsu~ tha~ ~ mcas~s m
adequately tmpl~m~nt~. In most cases, th~ !~gua~ or a~ mitigations inc~o~tes
Potcn~ly s~gnlflcant land ~s~ impacts involv~ pmjcc~ consist;ncy with existing land us~
l~sl conslst~n~ wtlh ~ CI~ General Phn Updal~l and land ~s, compatibility with
:so~undtnZ ~xistink'and ~poscd ~s6, ~e project as proposed ts found to bc pmlally
~nt wI~ ~ ~xls~Z SPA PI~ 'and Oen~r~ Plan Update, spec~c~ly th~ northern
~a which now pwposes single-family residential use tn comparison to tha~ ~ea's
$ m
Dlre~0t End. tlX~ l~oje~ now provides open space in the ""',"-- ':' ~"~'~:~:"
P~d~Y~i'buffc~n2 f~ ~d ~nslUon to emploment p~
~'.S~e~S~ls~yrlncludejSlopcs, se~backs,:and ':
:~ ... Z:~la~p[n2~lq~c~ubj~ea~g~r~eC~n~S~a~'
~ st~ enb~sh~ ~ ~8' 1984 SPA Pl~: ~nsisten~ ~ be v~Ged b~ '
...,.,: ........
ens~ by the G~ Plann~
D~, P~c field m~k~nZ sh~l ~'c~uc~ m cnsu~ ~at the npp~v~ plato
p~J~t ~ns~o~'OA~6 cb,npllanc~ Is achieved,' th~ Ci~ Planning Dl~ctor shall be .
The proposed Sall C~k ! developt,ent would cha~'~e ihe appearance of the project site as
character of the existing lar. dsect>e would be replaced by urban development,
This i~6nverslon has been previously ans~;~-ed and'npprovcd (ElK 81:3~ EIR 84.1). The
:leslp itandards. Grading proposed for - .I~
the reild~tial~iCS"may b'e ~iore senslth;~'~ia"'exlsttng topography than previously
~nd adJa~af~oedways now required and incorporated
th~ ~role~ (not in the'existing SPA Plan) will require extensl~;~ liradang which will
l'~tlul~L,l'visusl hnpactl4'?Itshould be noted that these roads are included in the Genenl PIn
~have(
project area'
De;,;Hoi~n~h ~ed in that area w{~h]d a'eate'.
potehtial impacts re~ardlng City- - ~.-:,
"~nd de~lopm'ent lighttrig arc mittSalad by project design and
n~sures hc~hi to i l~vel of L, islpHleance.'
ma has been re. designed to incorporate
satisfaction of the City (refer tothe EII~ Section V, Ahemafire D).
..~ The sit~' scape plan sr the site's southeast border
~' (condominhm project) shall delineate spcciil edSe treatment adjacent to the
.employment park oses to the southcasL The plans shall be subject to the acceptance
'"Of the City prlc~ to site plan al~provaL ~
~,~.,'.
Regulations/Standards and design criteria and
'requirements set forth in the 19114 SPA Plan (specifically .qec~lon V.C.3,,
page 21), compliance Is subject to City revl:w prier to Final Site Plan approval..,'.
~,.'~..
Project grading shall be contoured to blend with natu? sJ landforms, Techniques
in~iba 'r,3t~nding vertical and horizontal in(dtsectlons of graded lanes,':
~n,~o_rporafing ~,arlable Slope ra!l~s for larKel' s!ope banks, use of landscapln] rot'-,,,
other relevant sections of the CIty Grading Ordinance. .,~.,.~ .
-i~.
S ) the Land Use monitorin
h' ihii~ihe PI~s Dlr~e't~r will review daslgn chanSe~ and EMs ~AII monitor the
fn~!A' th~ field. Mid~'att6~'wm~requ~ that the gradlag te~hn~ues discussed E~I be ,'
f t~ final'map.' Compltan~ is rexlulred prior to approval of the final map.' An
he rcspo;nslblc for abjuring that mitigation is properly
b~th~h~ ~ '~o~"~u. uczlon~ and 'Sl~'~"i~re~aratl0~'P as. Landscapin2
r n has
mbllity and gismtcity.'. Those condid6n~'and potential impacts Can be rnidgated to 0. level
insignificance by mhtgntton tneasur~' proposed hereln. inchdinS subsequent
Ipeclfie earthwork analysis. sensitive gradlns and standard gradin~/sh~ preparation
packagn sl~all be prepared in' ..ccordance with .[,.,,,.,, ..-
recommendations of the March 1989 GcoSoils report, indlcatinS the approximate'I
mount ofeanh~ork removal ~/ahd iddres~i~i~ and mitigating any other -,c.: ,,
eo~$tralnts.~,'Onsh~'exca'~;atlon of th~ formatlonal units shall be
md shall define favorable select material for sins:rural fills. $ele~ fill
, be mixed whh the topsoil. alluvial and eolluvial soils for deep can}'on
fills. Any export material must have an approved spoil site Identlfied and
pro~:r~s defined. The |nvestlgatlon and eanhworlc p.~;kage shall be subjoel
ipproval I~), tl~8 Clty Engineer, prior to issuance of grading permits.,
S on tho project site shall be
to the'Sf~'[976 Uniform Building Code or sine-of-the-re'
~ l~metcr%'of the Structural Bn~neers Association d California,
with prone materials (i.e., granular sands of
th~ Ot~.~, F~iiiiatlc;~)'~all be"p~odded wlth appropriate surface drainage features
subl ii, pr al by the City, and shall be lan~caped trn~nedlately following
~ShXll be tn'~led !n'accordan~a'.wlth City requiremania to avoid erosion dui'tng
~pectton stud approul by City s~t.
thl Mai~!i.[1989 Oc~eSells ~epo~"Areii ~qulrini removal and rcpliceme~
expanslv~'iblli'lhall .be 'evaluated (r~i. i~ectal foundation desSin, etc.) by the
thc sfm sp~411c' tentative 2riding plan geetechnical
lnvesd~lons in a~mtance wl~h City grading procedures and monl~mg
e ~, or other
be dictated precisely on plans which
dfshsll occur.',' Vcrtficazlon' shall occur through o~site
nags or stabilization (l,e,, northeast side of
Slt-125, southeast'of "IS" Su'e~t,' the power tower in open space lot B), shall be. ..~
evaluated by the 2e'(~t~ical 'conSultan! and ndtlgated appropriately during site
.q~va~uatton'shal! be'~'er~ed and signed in written form at appropriate
phases
the Marcl{ 1989 CiteSoils r~port. Design shall be approved by the City, based on"
tl,'pe of soils encountered onshe and subsequent expansion testing, in
accordance with CI~ C~c r~ulrcments.
'Prier i~ lslu~c; of gudlng permits, outcrops shall be assessed for xtppabillty and
, for ~l! nUterlal;::Any additional mitigation shall be defined and may
In the'earthwork Invesdg~tlon, s_ubJect to a~roval by thc City,
constructed hi accordance wilh slope height as dictated in
this fleDSoils Mi.~:h 1989 report, ptZe :26. Further, fill slopes shall be constructed
at Zradlcnts'o/2:l or flatter, and in.accordance with Gay of Chula Vista codes, the--
lg Code alBC') and Grading Guidelines of The (teeSoils March
~d Open Space Lot 'A' shell be
~pecifi~ally in accordance wlth methodo108y dictated tn the March 1989~"
~0 The epprovst of The City prior to Issuance or
reconstructed u. shown in
oft ....
ulremenu d
~' City of (:hull VIsta l:0des, The UBC ancl recommemiatlons or the Geesoils March
:-,~" 1989 tzlx~n (specltlcally A~lx'ncllx A and pagei 29-30 of thsl repoa).
gaolechltlcll experl a~l~i
to Issuance or Fading permits.
· :, ".:',i. .-
sh~ll 'be r~sponsible for,monitorh~lI the
,f These mltiZat~'n measu~es'~ In addition. the geologist/environmental
shall be'(;ns~i; throtlgh~U! the entl~ ~adinZ phase of the project to
!mplementalin~and To tm avsllabl8 to mike decisions on issues not originally
the site at the n~rth and v,.~st boundaries,
t~ at The ~inage headwaters, 'the project's increased runoff will constitute a "
t~ a c~muladve Increase in flows. AlthouZh nccommo~don or these lncr~aP.~t "'
~mp~~ iS~nii]gable by installation of flood control
~lS~.~fdr~t~,~ plans (re.4ulr~d u ~:iga~n), ~Jcc: ~d cumula~ve
h~ ~r~oposed can also be ~Kated ~ a level of
~h~nce ~0 state reSuhdons ~d s~menmtlo~polh~on ranoff c~l
all applicable City flood con'Irol regulations, ...
. the proponent shall verify (on drainage plans) , ..,, ~..,
8 Cit7 En~Ine~r/Publlc WorkS De'parm~nt that project peak ~,~i
(by limiting the
flood routing, or ,.4.
Improvements), and will not impact the Proctor Valley"
~,'
s ~o provide
'for long-i~'~ 'e~O~oli; sedimentation' imi ~llU~t eon~l tn pwject ranoff.
be'sUbject to app~val by th~ City Endricer or ~ubllc Works
"~ ~ lss~ce of ~n~ ~, Subsequent to pmj~ ~plcfion
by f qu~ e~ ap~v~ b~ ~e GW (~ecfiOn Cost to
water
'Wat~ Dis~ct ~d S~te RedOhal Wat~ Quality Con~l
Construction sedlmenmtl~n will be conlrolled by adherence to City erofion conU'ol
m,;asth~s. Sedlmentatton basins and other mechanlsn~s sh~l be installed as deemed
nec~ssai7 by'the City Engineer or Public Works Department, lo control scourlnS'
!:tnd lncrca:~d seillmcnt toad~ ..MonhodnS duffnit iradln~ shall be conduct~ at the"
~appllca~fS:~e~sc t~ ve'dfy adeq~t'~'~;oslod cOnlrol..'- ~
!ens~!' th'it~:'the 'rnl,Sa~n~mcaS'u~eS' tre"effectively Implemented./Xt will be th~ ~ = ..
~to'~f~lwlth~llaPpltcableCltyfi~odcon~l, Otay ~!= (i'.~'~
, ti~etly Impact Vm'rloum bioloklctl resourcem (including
~ scrub tndtltmlzOnla con]ugetul onrdte ldentHled u slgt~ficant (see Flgure ~-7.
'~nd Table.:3.-2' ~i~ th~ BIR)t~ Mitigation' Woposes ~ffSlte '~0astal ,aS~ scrub habitat',
' '~ onstte reveSe~tton, landscaping and ~ete~on~f'~:~zznan~nt onsit'e open space
th'e'north~-.m"Slte ~'~.~ThC project wit1," In cOmblnktlon with other
.;~unavoidabl~, ~i~b~te to a' c~mula~ively siSntficant incremental
Iota'of valuable ,bl01ottcal hablml m ~,,
,-,
':..,
scrub s~s i'c~tmd In thb"~L~' lev~ieta~lo~%~' these area~ may cventu~y~.ro~
l~dsc~pl~2 materiali ~nvading natural habitats. Species
suitable for r~veZetation lncludc the following: -'~; :.: .'~ .........':.: ..
.~.
,~ $agcbrush
~ ~ P~at-topp~d B~':kwhent
Deerweed ,~.:,...,
Spp. ~, Lupine
areas followed
Matters Ma s~ed.~xes may be c~ngcd
~O/o~is~hO s~aH ~venee ~ve~eta~e~ p~cd~es at ~
should be complct~
biol6i~i~t ~' n;a'd~e~i~fdt h~Ul~li~"i~"thd
monit~ng pm~i~l
bd'dlbsely"d~ted is;det~id~ne64n,~,S~-~a:clty and
Remedial m~ai~=~e:g:~L~se~dlnb:'shall.be, {mpi'~nted if
~' ~solVed saje scrub habitat Md '.,,
d, and
~ical Sl~' ~dil be trnpactM by project dcveloprnent.
r~sourccS have a'hlgh potential to exist 'onslte within the Otay and
'SWe~twater f0~natlonS.~ Tncs~ impacts can bo mitlltate, d to an tnsiSnlflcant level by.
program I This
da~ r, co{;~gral ls'doslStl~l to'I) add~ss lmpo~l~t'~se~h, , ....
~osod ln~e mt ~pon (on file at ~e City of ~ula' Vista Pl~n["
Dep~nt)~ ~ 2).hcludo'a phased dam recov~ pw~m.' ~ts phas~ ap~ach
l.I ~m s~e ~ conjunction ~th a f~s~ tnvento~ for fea~es ~d
MS 'Gr PhD in ~al~ontolo~ or g~ology who is famlli~ with .....*" =''
~ s}.~I b~ onslt¢ at all times during th~ o~glnnl cutting or
y un~sturbed sediments of'th~ Otay Fom~atiofi'to inspect cuts for
fossils (th~ Otay Fomatton ~¢urs generalit abow ~80 feet ~l,vaflon).,
,
a halt-time basis. Periodic
'ih~ S~'ttago Pe'a~ Voicenice shall be conducted
~da~ons of the qu~ificd paleontologist. (A'.
pg~n~lo~ montt~ is defined as an tn~vldual who has cxpc~cncs h
~ nd $gVa/s of fossil ntis: ~e pg~nwlo~c~ mo~t~ should
~d. ~s p~eontolo~st (or'
: V~n~lo~eg m~nitor) Shall b~ ~owed'to tempon~ly dir~ ~v~. or h~t,
~Y~g ~ ~oW ~O~'Of fOsitl'~'~i in a timely manner.' Becin~ of
~S of sm~ foisH ~S'such M hola~d ~g tse~,
' ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ a ~en;wn~g'~on on ~s slte.-
; "~:' :"I'-~,atx102cd aid the~ with ~he owner's permission, deposhed in a sctcnltfic L, xsdmtlon 'with palcontoloSics~ collections such as the San Diego Nattnl History Museum.
;',. [ ':/ ..-.! ?~'. ~.~'
s deacribed In the xnltlgatlon measures ltsted above.
'; ~'' .~.'..s~
2erierite ~an employment park uses previously
approvcd, thus the project Will x'esUlf~h"'i. less significant traffic increase than the existing
SPA Pfin,'Consdmth2 it compL"ad~,qi;~shlv~ project impact.
From a cumulative standpoint, the proposed project has been ~nco~porated into traffic/land
ie proJec~ons of '~ 6:ncrel Plan (CtP) Update. Further, additional wadways identified
II critical to serve projected City development (in the C3r, Update traffic projections) are
a~i~l/{cl{/ded In l~roJ,,~ ;lie desl~n,~S~ect~:ally, San Mi2ucl Road and Proctor Valley ' 'v:
tO the 'p~pose~ site 'dcslgn pursuant to City direction (nOte that thes~ '"
~v'~"i~ot lncor~orkted in the existing SPA Plan). The circulation improvements and
EastlAke l Developmant A~'eement and Publie PaOlities ~lnancinS
~ ~ ~ul~ons, schemes and ~n~c~g ap~ed by
General Plan Updat~ '; ~
'Circulation Eqemem and ~ny programs ~i~blish~d therein which are applicable
IreJeer area O.e.;' Fee programs, ~ubSequent 6arFl~ analysis). Mhllaflon
in EIE 88-:2 C~ection ~.14) and the Oenera1 Phn Update CIrculation
~lement Policies/Guidelines and RoadWay S~and.a,nts C$~tions 4 and 5') ar~ hereby
incorporated by ~f~rence~ future actions on the i~roJect site shall adhere to' thes~
irevisions For adequat~ cimulation~ In addition, the project'shall comply with any/,.
'appLicable traffic threshold crite.~ as de~e~apl~ate by the City Engtn~r.~' "" '' ~
City BnZlneer/PUb|le Wor~s Dep~me~t will be repo~n/tble for ensurtni that the Fin~l ~'.
~je~ dcslln |n~orp~x-~ mhl~allon! ~3 ~d S4 and that these measures are properly., .~
L'1 the rleld where applicable.. "~'
~ Nols~ attributed to future cumulative
itraffic Volumes on Ilttt'"H" Sl~'~id SR-12~. Ext~o~ ~otse barriers and interior noise
°' ' &ttenUallon measures Cfo~r~ldcntlnl ~arus exceeding acceptable noise levels) ar~ proposed
as mitigation f~ onstt~ rioItS' ensure noise impacts
I ~ ,~ ~oise bsJ'ders.f. or the'sl~ houses shall be delineated in
~...' ~:,.~.. Table 3-~ and illustrated In lFilture 3-10 of the Salt Creek EIR, Barriers shall be
.~.~.:~!~.~,~..~oc~t~d~t~a~fs~p~ougtheedge~fther~adwayi~mL~t27t~L~t77and
at the top of slo~ along the .edge~ of the rear yard for the rest of the lots (from lot
high g s~-ucture separating Ml~-lots I-5 from SR-125
~ shall be continuous, with no opening b~tween
mullt-fa__m_Wly LOtS l-S;'.~ Xf th~ parking SirUct~ires do not provide s'ufflclent
attanuatlon, thin addltlon~l ban~er roedella; will be required loS' these lots, The
lo~ted 'at the pad elevatl0n for patio barriers and at the 2nd floor flnlshcd
j.:' alepatton for l~loony bln'iars. The barrier heights to attentuatu noise at thesa 13
multiple-family units shall be provided as ~resented in Table 3-5 and located in
~7; The pwposed noise barden for the single- and muhlplc.~amlly units shall have a
lurface et.t~;~.of at least 3.~ pounds p~r s~uare fool, and shall have no openings
! or cracks. 'rt ma' be ~onstrut'ted of 1/4 Inch plate glass, 5/8 inch plexlglass, any
masonry m~terlai~r~t~t~t~hI~tlc>~t ~{th~se materials. WoOd and o~her materials
acc'.i~blc 1/~,'bi~rt); d~sl~ed as a noise barrier. Implementation of
~ite nols~"bttrt~rl shleldtni'slntl~; and multiple-family outdoOr llvinl
~;Ould rtduee poiential noise Impacts to below a level of significance.
Detailed shall be c0nductCd
=vels are schlcved by th~ buildingS'for rcsldential b~cllni attenuation.
· gr~a~¢r 'than 20"riB(A)Cl,;BL'~!Th~'actual n~ise attenl
bY 't~'+bUlidl~:~i~:'~i;?!~'eil ~U'th'~"~i~ildl~!iradeS required shal
~ pi'~S b~'~e' ~,~ilabie;!.~dcqu'at~ aizenuat~on
to assume' s c. r
~ '~'~ndows closCd'm~st bcpw~dcd
A~;c0ndldo~i"~d
~ ~'~ d8sl~ 0r ~ rendition
(A) CNZT.~ the shall comply with State
Callfcn~la's Tttle :IA requiring an Interior 'boise analysis ~0' confirm that noise
j~eI~ do not exceed 45 d]] (A) CNEL;~ Detelled 'e~klneerln2 calculations will also
be rcqulfed .to Confirm idequate lnterlor holse levels (pursuant to the City's
standard) after'detailed blrders'l~ationl"a~d'l~clShti"ha:~els~n eitablJ. shed
required) ~,ould .~U~e' ~te~tlal blt~l~.~n~ii~ Impacts.to-below a
; .....
...... 'Z';:,:,:,: .
= 'ticainu final project dcst~ ind.
,... ;'staff. Reld ~'~i~/~llancc shall bem~nhorcd by City EnKineer~i
ensure that the mitigations are lmplemented;"A follow-up acoustical analysis should
Ihe mitigation Is effective; if not, additional mhtgttffon shall bc developed
SPA Plan, the propos~d'amendrrznt will,
~encrate. fc~' air' p~ll,itanu du~:i~ .lo'wcr]nfflo volumes. ~ Ilowever, because project
de~elopmeni'~Vu iot [ne~d intO'adopted SAI, rDAO air quallty'at'~nment 2row~h]
z,~Cao,~ ~,;r'e,e s,~ ~cs',,' ~'ito~; i'n,,,ung'Or
prOJect ln~Onslstency must be made for ~' '.:.
~to reduce:
pe~nt ea~ be 'realized by !mplementatio~ ~f dlesemcalures. (-' '
be as soon as posalbl~
and as dlrecw. d b~ the City to reduce dust 2enerarlon.
Trucks ha~'.lnS fill material shall be properly coverr~i.
~pced limit shall be enforced on unpaved surfaces.. .;., ~
I monitor to be onsite
open 2plic~' ~ll 'COh'st~iefidonOf ~ Iden~fi~ n¢~/0r ~s~on of comm~ty open. "':
· e p~J~ pr~ncn~ shall pay a p~
fee of $84~,820 u sho~ in Table ~-l l ~nyablc to ~ ~ty
S, acent
areas s~ch as S~It Crcclc Ranch xnd EastLalce Bustne.e~ P;,rk. tH~cways ~d xralls
~.. ~all be t~¢nfified on the tent,tire map and site plans. Configurztlons shall respect
~11 natu~l ~n $pa~c/conservatlo~ areas, and shall be sub]oct to revtcw and
~ and ~,s. rks and Recreation Departments,
acent to homes ironring ¢;n open space', In
or the boundary between residential property and
ts'~uanee of 2~'adlng permits. '-
In open areu shall be maintained as much as possible (s~bject to City . ,~,
review) in a hamrid State. Where gredin2 must occur on slopes Zdjzcent to housing,,.'. 1 !~ ~!
'.30 feet ofSuCcUten~'or ot~r acceptable width and plant material shall be'planted,'. -
followed by a' l~-foot DG]rall to act aS a firebreak, Planting or halire, drouZht' ~' ~ ~
hllt b~'provlded ~l~'ser to the n~ral t~pen spac~
incorporated into tho
project subject to the approval of the. Cit,/,_ Most or the mitigations will
rcquhs an Environmjntal Monitor in the fisld to ensure proper implementation oi' the '
and the hst midgatlOn measure will require a qualified biologist
and/c~ horltculto~st/cnvlrCnmental xpcclallst to effcctlvcly implement the mitigated
$l~approval by the FIfe Manhal In Open Space Coordinator will be ncccsss.~7. -'
policies, with the cxccptlon of tv,/oU~r~higablc cumulative impacts.. The .
-... :.,
2 unavoidable lnc~c,,se in cten~td for water and non. renewable energy
a contribution to cumulative impacts on the reglon's limited water .. ,, :: .~.~,.
Supply and. cncrlly resources. In Combination with other ongoing development In the";' ''~
Mlt'l~.adon measures for water demand will rcduco the :.'rigact bu~ not to a level or
ni~cance. <t ~.
F final maps, the proponent shall obtain v.,lll.acrve letiers
,lag that water ~'acllltles proposed shall adequately service the prnJcct. via
Recommendations of the/~?.
W,.~cr for salt Creek I (Wilson En~lnae~ng. Match 1939) ...hall bc
tnd utilized as It 'S, uidallne. In con sul~tio~ with OWD.
pump shall be (C
~opo$cd pump capacity, ln'a~Cordance With th8 March 1989 Mastor-
.'W~son BnSinccrfnl~); sub.jeer to approval by the City Bngtneer prior
end for maintenance oi'~
]i~all be crc~ted and implemented b)' the project p~ponent,
C0ordtna~n ~thlth~ dt~ Public Works Department and in consultation with OWD
quaiLS'led witt.~.er~ a~Cncy/0i;2e:nl~;;tton:FApproFiate conserv'atton measures ~,
which mtnlmlzc ranoff and evaporation loss.
: implementation
' ih/U be app~-,,ea p~or tO ~su~mce of cc.mcat- of use and occupana~. ·
be r~Vte~'ed knd approved b~ih~~ Clt~,'BriSineer prior to any final 'map
ma~'l~Voi~e'~frcemcnt 'to be reached
~F the
I~tingtncet Implementation of the system shall be installed In a manner a~d at the
rtimc dictated b~, the City. Eng~neer~ Approval may involve an eg~eement between
the developer and City which will dictate how and where sewage ts ,ccommod,ted,
lmpl ph
and f~ltty financln2 and cmcnt,tton asln2.
'CThe ~roJe~t :h~ll. to the extent feasible and to the safisC~ctton or the c ty, provld
the follow~n2 !, an effort t;j ~d'~ce the impact to energy resources:
y providing bus londlng Itones
inslie';' Prior to final site plan approval. the devclopcr shall consult
:.