HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1988/04/26 Item 15•
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 15
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Meeting Date_4/26/88
Public Hearing: PCZ-88-K - Consideration to prezone the
proposed Bonita-Sunnyside Annexation Area to existing County
zoning - City initiated
SECOND PEADlf~dG AND ADOPTION
Ordinance ~~ ~ ~ prezoning the proposed Bonita-Sunnyside
Annexation Area to existing County zoning
Director of Planning
City Manager ~ ~yG..~~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes No X )
The proposed ordinance would prezone the lands constituent to the
Bonita-Sunnyside Annexation to their existing zoning classificationspinpothe
County. By operation of the proposed ordinance, the lands so prezoned would
retain their County zoning upon annexation.
The proposal is exempt from environmental review.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a motion enacting the ordinance attached hereto as
~xhibit A.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission on March 13,
1988, recommended 7-0 that the ordinance be passed.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council, in March of 1987, adopted Ordinance No. 2198, an ordinance
which was similar to the one submitted with this report. The 1987 ordinance,
however, did not take effect since "the petition for annexation was not
approved by the voters on the November, 1987 ballot." This condition
precedent did not occur since the annexation proposal was not fully processed
by the time of the November, 1987 election.
The Bonita-Sunnyside Annexation is now proposed for inclusion on the November,
1988 ballot, and the readoption of the proposed prezoning ordinance is
suggested.
LP,FCO staff believes that the prezoning of the Bonita-Sunnyside area at an
early date would preclude the uncertainty associated with the said area's
post-election zoning from prejudicing the November, 1988, election. The said
staff urges the adoption of the proposed interim ordinance within the next two
weeks, in order that it might include an analysis of such in its report to the
LAFCO commission, which will consider the subject annexation early in the
spring of this year.
~ ~
~ J
•
ANALYSIS:
Page 2, Item 1~
Meeting Date-~7~8
When P~ontgomery was annexed to Chula Vista in 1985, the City Council passed an
emergency ordinance adopting the County of San Diego Zoning Ordinance as an
interim control subsequent to December 31, 1985.
A similar process is anticipated should Bonita decide to annex to the City of
Chula Vista. A policy similar to the one adopted for Montgomery with respect
to Planning and Zoning is also contemplated. That policy would be as follows:
"County zoning regulations will continue to prevail while a study is
conducted to determine the relationship of existing development. County
zoning regulations and proposed City zoning for the area. The Sweetwater
Planning Committee will review these issues and make recommendations to
the Planning Commission and City Council on a proposed zoning plan."
The proposed ordinance would implement that policy and only become effective
subsequent to voter approval of the annexation proposal. Non-zoning
regulations such as the Building Code, Subdivision Ordinance, Environmental
Review procedures and other City requirements, policies and standards not
referenced by the Zoning Ordinance would not be affected. Fees for
applications would be paid in accordance with City fee schedules for the
~arious types of actions.
The County's Animal Regulations are a part of the County Zoning Ordinance and
thus would be carried over as is with the adoption of this ordinance. This
carry over should resolve any concerns of the residents of Bonita-Sunnyside
regarding the imposition of City animal regulations to the area.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
WPC 4947P
• I /~-~'
by tho Ci~y CVu cif of
Chula Vista, Caii~ornia
~-~- ,
9~
by t:~o Ciy Cca~ .il of
Chula Vista, California
Dated