Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1988/04/19 Item 8a, bCOUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT • Item 8a, b Meeting Date 4/19/88 ITEM TITLE: a) Resolution/3~"oZj Approving an agreement with the County of San Diego to amend an agreement for funding and implementation of public improvement projects in Montgomery b) Resolution Approving an agreement with the County of San Diego for funding and implementation of the Palm Avenue Drainage Improvements Project SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Director' REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~ ~ f4/5ths Vote: Yes No X ) ,_- One of the capital projects funded by the County prior to the City annexation of Montgomery was the installation of asphalt walkways on Main Street from Albany Street to the Industrial Boulevard. The project has not yet been implemented. With the recent Council approval of the Proposition A priority list of projects, permanent improvements are scheduled to be installed on that stretch of Main Street within the next three years. It is therefore recommended that a previously approved agreement with the County for public • improvement projects in Montgomery should be amended to reallocate funds from the Main Street Walkways. Another pre-annexation, County-funded Montgomery project not yet implemented was the installation of street and drainage improvements on Date Street and Palm Avenue in Brodericks' Acres. The project has been redesigned to fit the available funds, and implementation of an alternative version of the project is now proposed. The recommended actions amend and create documents with the County to address these circumstances. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the amended agreement with the County of San Diego to amend an agreement for funding and implementation of public improvement projects in Montgomery and approve an agreement with the County of San Diego for funding and implementation of the Palm Avenue Drainage Improvements Project. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Montgomery Planning Committee concurs with the staff recommendation in that on March 17, 1988, the Committee recommended that the County be asked to drop the Main Street walkways project and reallocate the funds to the Palm Avenue Draining Improvements Project. • • • b the Cii~;~ !~' r:. ~~Cil of Chula Vis`:;, Cai~ornia DISCUSSION: Page 2, Item 8a, b Meeting Date 4 9 8 In 1985-86, the County funded $30,000 to install temporary asphalt walkways in the missing segments of sidewalk along Main Street from Albany Street to Industrial Boulevard. The priority list of Proposition A projects, recently adopted by the Council, provides for the installation of permanent concrete sidewalks along Piain Street in 1991. It is not cost effective for temporary sidewalks to be installed and replaced with permanent sidewalks in 1991. Therefore, the project is proposed to be dropped and the remaining funds reallocated to the drainage project. The County funded a Date Street/Palm Avenue street improvement and drainage project in the amount of $255,000. As originally planned, the project was to include street widening and repaving and the installation of gutters and drainage inlets for both Date Street and Palm Avenue. Cost estimates recently completed by the County indicate that the project will now cost $550,000, $295,000 short of meeting the project need. This information was presented to the Montgomery Planning Committee in January 1988 and the Committee recommended that the County be requested to redesign the project to include only drainage improvements along Palm Avenue. The installation of drainage improvements along Palm Avenue would remove a flooding hazard to adjacent residential properties and, by intercepting the flood water, would also lessen the flooding hazard to the residential properties along Date Street to the west. By redesigning the project, it is now estimated to cost $305,000. The City Engineer recommends that remaining funds from the Main Street Walkways be added to the project and that the County be instructed to install the Palm Avenue improvements from the south end of the project to as far north as available funds allow. FISCAL IMPACT: No City funds are involved; however, routine maintenance for the improvements at Palm Avenue will be the responsibility of the City. By combining funds from Main Street, approximately $285,000 will be available for the Palm Avenue project. WPC 3488H Dated ..,~ ;_. COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT • Item 8a, b Meeting Date 4/19/88 ITEM TITLE: a) Resolution Approving an agreement with the County of San Diego to amend an agreement for funding and implementation of public improvement projects in Montgomery b) Resolution,~.~dZ ~ Approving an agreement with the County of San Diego for funding and implementation of the Palm Avenue Drainage Improvements Project SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Director ~, REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~. ~~E4/5ths Vote: Yes No X ) .One of the capital projects funded by the County prior to the City annexation of Montgomery was the installation of asphalt walkways on h?ain Street from Albany Street to the Industrial Boulevard. The project has not yet been implemented. With the recent Council approval of the Proposition A priority list of projects, permanent improvements are scheduled to be installed on that stretch of Main Street within the next three years. It is therefore recommended that a previously approved agreement with the County for public • improvement projects in Montgomery should be amended to reallocate funds from the Main Street Walkways. Another pre-annexation, County-funded Montgomery project not yet implemented was the installation of street and drainage improvements on Date Street and Palm Avenue in Brodericks' Acres. The project has been redesigned to fit the available funds, and implementation of an alternative version of the project is now proposed. The recommended actions amend and create documents with the County to address these circumstances. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the amended agreement with the County of San Diego to amend an agreement for funding and implementation of public improvement projects in Montgomery and approve an agreement with the County of San Diego for funding and implementation of the Palm Avenue Drainage Improvements Project. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Montgomery Planning Committee concurs with the staff recommendation in that on March 17, 1988, the Committee recommended that the County be asked to drop the Main Street walkways project and reallocate the funds to the Palm Avenue Draining Improvements Project. • • • ~~ ~_~ DISCUSSION: Page 2, Item 8a, b Meeting Date 4 19 88 In 1985-86, the County funded $30,000 to install temporary asphalt walkways in the missing segments of sidewalk along Main Street from Albany Street to Industrial Boulevard. The priority list of Proposition A projects, recently adopted by the Council, provides for the installation of permanent concrete sidewalks along P-gain Street in 1991. It is not cost effective for temporary sidewalks to be installed and replaced with permanent sidewalks in 1991. Therefore, the project is proposed to be dropped and the remaining funds reallocated to the drainage project. The County funded a Date Street/Palm Avenue street improvement and drainage project in the amount of $255,000. As originally planned, the project was to include street widening and repaving and the installation of gutters and drainage inlets for both Date Street and Palm Avenue. Cost estimates recently completed by the County indicate that the project will now cost $550,000, $295,000 short of meeting the project need. This information was presented to the Montgomery Planning Committee in January 1988 and the Committee recommended that the County be requested to redesign the project to include only drainage improvements along Palm Avenue. The installation of drainage improvements along Palm Avenue would remove a flooding hazard to adjacent residential properties and, by intercepting the flood water, would also lessen the flooding hazard to the residential properties along Date Street to the west. By redesigning the project, it is now estimated to cost $305,000. The City Engineer recommends that remaining funds from the Main Street Walkways be added to the project and that the County be instructed to install the Palm Avenue improvements from the south end of the project to as far north as available funds allow. FISCAL IMPACT: No City funds are involved; however, routine maintenance for the improvements at Palm Avenue will be the responsibility of the City. By combining funds from Main Street, approximately $285,000 will be available for the Palm Avenue project. WPC 3488H th,v City Cc,uncil Of Chula Vista, Cu;,ifornia Dated i .%