HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1987/12/15 Item 14COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
• Item 14
Meeting Date 12/15/87
ITEM TITLE: Resolution,C~J~ / ~ Extension of the Contract for Planning
Services of Mr. William F. Heiter for the Montgomery Specific
Plan and Appropriating Funds
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning Q)
REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~~"~~1' (4/5ths Vote: Yes X No
On February 18, 1986, the City Council authorized the employment of Mr.
William F. Heiter as the contract senior city planner for the preparation of
the Draft Montgomery Specific Plan. Mr. Heiter's contract of employment
expires on December 31, 1987.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the attached resolution, and authorize
the Mayor to execute the three-month extension of the subject contract on
behalf of the City of Chula Vista and appropriate the necessary funds.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
• DISCUSSION:
The City of Chula Vista, in February of 1986, contracted with Mr. Heiter for
his planning services in conjunction with the preparation of a Specific Plan
for the recently-annexed Montgomery Community. Beginning in February of 1986,
he has, as contract project manager, supervised the preparation of Parts One
and Two of the three part Draft Montgomery Specific Plan. Said Parts One and
Two have been completed and are scheduled for public hearing before the City
Council on January 12, 1988. Part One provides the foundation or basis for
the plan proper. It contains the City Planning survey, evaluation, trends
analysis and forecasts. Part Two, the "Plan Proper," sets forth the plan's
goals, general objectives, policies, principles, and planning and design
proposals. Part Three, which will embody the implementation proposals and the
conclusion of the Montgomery Specific Plan, will be prepared subsequent to the
adoption of Parts One and Two. It is estimated that it will take three months
to bring Parts One and Two of the Draft Montgomery Specific Plan to fruition
and complete the draft of Part Three. Because of his in-depth knowledge of
the planning project, it would be highly desirable to retain Mr. Heiter's
planning services through the first three months of 1988.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of Mr. Heiter's services for the aforementioned
three-month period would be X9,187.50. This amount would need to be funded
from the General Fund.
• WPC 4543P
the City Co.~ncil of
Chula Vista, California
Dated ~