Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1981/08/04 Item 17COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 1~ Meeting Date 8/4/81 ITEM TITLE: Resolution~a,s~/ - Confirming the City's Policy Supporting a Lower Business License Tax on Manufacturers SUBMITTED BY: City Attorney (4/5ths Vote: Yes Nom) This resolution confirms the City's policy of applying a lower business license tax on manufacturers. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Resolution BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A DISCUSSION: For several years, Pacific Telephone has protested the amount of business license tax that the City has required from them. This protest was based on a provision of the California Constitution which protected utilities from discriminatory tax treatment. Pacific Telephone gave this provision a broad reading under which it believed it could only be taxed at a rate equal to the lowest business license tax rate in town. They, therefore, insisted that they should be treated as manufacturers even though they engaged in no manufacturing activities in Chula Vista. This issue was litigated recently in the City of Livermore. Both the City staff and Pacific Telephone agreed to abide by the decision in the Livermore case. That decision has now been handed down and it generally supports the City's position. James Haggerty, attorney for Pacific Telephone, has noted one discrepancy, however, and that is that Livermore had a resolution which specifically stated the reason which the City of Livermore had for its different tax treatment of different businesses. Mr. Haggerty requested that the City pass a similar resolution before Pacific Telephone pay the higher tax rate because he foresees a number of conflicts with other public agencies and he wants to take a consistent position in each case that different tax rates must be based on articulated reasons. Although I believe .the rationale for differential tax treatment is sustainable and it is the position we have always maintained, I see no problem in adopting the proposed policy statement which will satisfy all parties and we will then continue to tax the telephone company operation in the City of Chula Vista as we have done in the past. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)