HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm min 1995/01/11 MINUTES OF A REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING
OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Council Chambers
7:04 p.m. Public Services Building
Wednesday, January 11, 1995 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Tuchscher, Commissioners Fuller, Martin,
Ray, Salas, Tarantino, and Willett
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Assistant Planning Director Lee, Principal Planner
Griffin, Associate Planner Hernandez, Contract
Attorney Basil
MOTION TO EXCUSE - None
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chair Tuchscher led in the pledge of allegiance to the flag and a moment of silence.
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
Chair Tuchscher waived the introductory remarks at the request of the other Commissioners,
since everyone present had previously attended a Planning Commission meeting. He wished
everyone a happy New Year. Chair Tuchscher welcomed John Willett as the newest member
of the Planning Commission and noted some of Commissioner Willett's work on previous and
current committees and commissions.
Commissioner Willett thanked Chair Tuchscher for the welcome, and asked to abstain from
voting at this meeting since he had just been sworn in on the previous Monday.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None
PC Minutes -2- January 11, 1995
ITEM 1: PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-94-09: REQUEST
TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE EXISTING APPROVAL FOR A PRIVATE
SCHOOL FOR THREE YEARS (THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1999) AND TO
ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF SAID SCHOOL FACILITIES INTO THE
SECOND STORY OF THE BUILDING LOCATED AT 2400 FENTON
STREET Covenant Christian School (Continued from the meeting of
December 21, 1994)
Chair Tuchscher noted that the applicant had requested that Item No. 1 be pulled from the
meeting. Principal Planner Griffin asked that it be continued to the meeting of February 8,
1995.
MSC (Martin/Salas) 6-0-1 (Willett abstaining) to continue PCC-94-09 to February 8, 1995.
ITEM 2: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF THE FOLLOWING
APPLICATIONS FILED BY ERNESTO UNDERWOOD FOR THE EP-1B
DISTRICT AND 1.3 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
TIERRA DEL REY AND CANARIOS COURT WITHIN THE RANCHO DEL
REY BUSINESS CENTER:
a. PCM-95-05: AMENDMENT TO THE RANCHO DEL REY
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) I PLAN PC DISTRICT
REGULATIONS TO ALLOW BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DENTAL PRACTICE AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO A DENTAL
LABORATORY OR DENTAL APPLIANCE MANUFACTURING
WITHIN THE EMPLOYMENT PARK LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (EP- 1 B)
LAND USE DISTRICT OF THE RANCHO DEL REY BUSINESS
CENTER.
b. PCC-95-14: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A
DENTAL PRACTICE AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO A DENTAL
LABORATORY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TIERRA DEL
REY AND CANARIOS COURT WITHIN THE EMPLOYMENT PARK
LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (EP-1B) LAND USE DISTRICT OF THE
RANCHO DEL REY BUSINESS CENTER.
Associate Planner Hernandez presented the staff report, giving the location of the project, the
adjacent land uses, and the differences between EP-1A and EP-1B land use districts. Staff
recommended that the Planning Commission adopt PCM-95-05 recommending that the City
Council approve the SPA Amendment in accordance with the draft City Council ordinance and
the findings contained therein, and adopt Planning Commission resolution PCC-95-14 approving
the conditional use permit based on the findings and subject to the conditions therein. He noted
that the Planning Commission resolution approval of the conditional use permit was contingent
upon approval of the SPA amendment.
PC Minutes -3- January 11, 1995
Commissioner Fuller asked when staff was reviewing the proposed uses between the SDG&E
substation and the area that was vacant, was it indicated that a proposed use for that was storage
garages, and why would that be appropriate in an employment park?
Associate Planner Hernandez stated that self-storage units was a permitted use in the Limited
Industrial zone of the business center. In this instance, it was a self-storage facility. Answering
Commissioner Fuller, he stated it had been approved by the Design Review Committee. For
the self-storage facility, all the applicant would have to do would be to apply for a building
permit.
Assistant Planning Director Lee noted that it was not likely that the project would proceed.
They had approval, but had indicated that it did not appear to be economically feasible to
proceed. Typically, within an industrial park that type of facility would occur on a limited
basis.
Commissioner Willett asked if staff intended to amend the SPA to include the storage. Principal
Planner Griffin, referring to page 2-23, item B-l, noted the types of facilities that were proposed
for that lot had been included since the SPA Plan was originally adopted.
Commissioner Willett was concerned that an open storage yard would be a distraction. Assistant
Planning Director Lee clarified that it was a mini-storage building, not an open yard type of
storage facility.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Gary Cinti, 3639 Midway Drive, San Diego, representing the applicant, stated that they
supported staff's recommendations and the conditions, and had the support of the master
developer, Rancho Del Rey Partnership, who was in attendance if there were any questions.
Commissioner Salas asked Mr. Cinti how common it was to have a dental practice connected
with the manufacturing of orthodontics. Mr. Cinti stated that the doctor's dental practice was
in a shopping center, and his manufacturing was done elsewhere. It was an attempt to try to
stay in the same community, but to create some efficiency. He felt it was probably not
common, but it was to his benefit.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Martin stated that he was familiar with these types of laboratories. They have
a very low noise level with no effect to the environment by waste. This was a high tech
business, and Commissioner Martin felt this was an ideal place for that type of project. He
recommended that the Planning Commissioners enthusiastically support the project. It was a
good project and the type of business needed.
PC Minutes -4- January 11, 1995
MS (Fuller/Martin) to adopt Resolution PCM-95-05 recommending that the City Council
approve the Sectional Planning Area SPA I Plan District Regulations Amendment in
accordance with the draft City Council Ordinance and the findings contained therein; and
adopt Resolution PCC-95-14 approving the Conditional Use Permit based on the findings
and subject to the conditions listed therein.
Commissioner Ray asked if any large tracks were used for delivery, or if they were small
courier-type vehicles. Commissioner Martin was not sure, but stated that typically they were
like UPS or their own courier service or through the mail.
Attorney Basil asked if Commissioner Fuller could restate her motion to make them two separate
actions, with the first motion to be adoption of PCM-95-05 and the second PCC-95-14.
RESTATEMENT OF MOTION
MSC (Fuller/Martin) 6-0-1 (Willett abstaining) to adopt Resolution PCM-95-05
recommending that the City Council approve the Sectional Planning Area SPA I Plan
District Regulations Amendment in accordance with the draft City Council Ordinance and
the findings contained therein.
MSC (Fuller/Martin) 6-0-1 (Willett abstaining) to adopt Resolution PCC-95-14 approving
the Conditional Use Permit based on the findings and subject to the conditions listed
therein.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Assistant Planning Director Lee reported there had been no items before the City Council
because of the holidays. He noted the dinner workshop to be held the next Wednesday and
asked who would be attending. All Commissioners indicated their attendance.
Mr. Lee stated there had been only one item scheduled for the January 25, 1995, meeting. That
item was being shifted to February 8. He asked the Commission to cancel the meeting of
January 25.
MSC (Martin/Ray) 6-0-1 (Willett abstaining) to cancel the meeting of January 25, 1995.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
Chair Tuchscher asked Principal Planner Griffin to share with the Conunission the results of the
Design Review Committee meeting regarding the biotech zone. Mr. Griffin stated that the DRC
voted, as did the Commission, unanimously to support the proposal. Staff would be going back
to the Design Review Committee with the first plans approved under the program to let them
PC Minutes -5- January 11, 1995
see what they looked like. If the DRC had any concerns, they would be forwarded on to the
Council. They were comfortable with the proposal.
Commissioner Ray asked what was going into the old Home Depot area. Associate Planner
Hernandez stated that improvement plans had been received from Sports Authority for the
southern portion of the Home Depot, which had been approved. Now they had decided to
occupy the northern end instead. Commissioner Ray asked if an economic review had been
done. He was concerned that the business might wipe out Big 5.
Assistant Planning Director Lee stated that part of the consideration by City Council in moving
the Home Depot was to make sure the old building was not divided into more than two users.
Beyond that, the City had no control over the tenant mix. It was his understanding that the
owners of the Center did not have a specific clause with Big 5 to prohibit another sports business
to be there.
Commissioner Martin was uncomfortable with discussing what would be good for some business
and not for another. He recognized the importance of an anchor store, but felt it was market
driven.
Chair Tuchscher clarified that Mr. Ray's question was if any thought had been given to a
potential new tenant for the inevitable vacancy.
Commissioner Salas questioned the time limit on Sports Authority moving in. Associate Planner
Hernandez stated that a building permit had been approved for an expansion as well as
improvement. He was not familiar with the timeframe for completion.
Answering Chair Tuchscher, Mr. Hernandez said the only discretionary approval was an
amendment to the plan signing program. The building was being expanded slightly, and had to
go through an administrative design review process. Staff was authorized to approve up to
20,000 sq. ft. rather than going through Design Review.
ADJOURNMENT at 7:35 p.m. to the Dinner Workshop Meeting of January 18, 1995 at 5:30
p.m. in Conference Rooms 2/3, and to the Regular Business Meeting of Wednesday, January 25,
1995 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Nancy-- Ripl~y, Secretary"
Planning Commission