The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReso 1980-9943 RESOLUTION NO. 9943 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL VISTA ADOPTING IN LIEU PARKING AREA 1 OF THE CHULA VISTA TOWN NO. I OF THE CITY OF CHULA FEE POLICY FOR SUB- CENTRE PROJECT AREA The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista that that certain In Lieu Parking Fee Policy for Subarea 1 of the Chula Vista Town Centre Project Area No.1, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full, be, and the same is hereby adopted. Presented by ." \ c~() --,.~--"./\.........-,,, rson, Dlrector of Approved as to form by \ D. ., e .'- Plannlng #~.~~ George D. Llndberg, Clty Attorney (---...., ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 5th day of' February , 198 0 by the follouing vote, to-wit: AYES: Councilmen Gillow, Cox, Hyde, McCandliss, Scott NAYES: Councilmen None AESENT: Councilmen None w&.Q ~t~ Mayor of the City of Chula Vista ~ ST E OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) SSe CITY OF CHULA VISTA) I, , City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. , and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED Ci i:y C:l(~rk In Lieu Parking Fee Policy for Subarea 1 of the Chula Vista Town Centre Project Area No.1 1. Any developer of a new commercial building within the Downtown Parking District, in Subarea 1 of the Chula Vista Town Centre No.1 Project Area, except for the lands ~ituated within the Townsite Focus Area, or any developer of an addition to an existing commercial building therein, shall pay an In-lieu Parking Fee to the City of Chula Vista prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for ~uch new building or addition. 2. The In lieu Parking Fee, which shall be computed by the Director of Finance in each applicable case, is predicated upon one-fourth of the fair market value of the land which the developer would normally be required to devote to off-street parking, and shall be based upon the fo11owing formula: In Lieu Fee ($) = No. of required spaces x 350 x fair market value of land (lL~&tt.) 4 Notes, Values, and Terms No. of required spaces = Offstreet parking spaces required for a new building or addition under the City of Chula Vista's zoning regulations, if U,e building or adJition wel'~ not within the Downtow!1 Parking District. 350 The square fo:.taye I)f a st~ndi'\i"d ra rking ~pace and its appurtenant InanelJl_ "ring area, 'landscaping, and c'riveway~;. Fair market value = Recently dppraised or estimated u~lue. Where acceptabfl to the developer, the Director of Finance shall accept $10.00 pel- square foot as the fair market value of cOJ,lm~V'cia-1 land within the Town Centre No. I Project Area. If an appraisal is required, the developer shall pay the cos'L of sur.h 3. All of the fees collected under this policy shall be credited to the accouni of the Parking Place Commission, and shall be used for the purchase or development uf parking site~ which will gener~1ly and directly benefit Subarea 1 of the Town Centre No. I Project Area. ~. The In Lieu Parking Fee Policy is not applicable to development within the To~nsitp FOCl'~- Areo. 5. Yhe Director of Community Development shall have the continuing respo~sibili~y of mcnHori:1g land values within the To\\n Centre Project Ar'~a, and of recommending changes. in tile In lieu Fee's fo:---mula" where such are indicateC;, EXHIBIT A ,{-7'?r3 ,... ittltltlJ u::.~~.~;~ r......) ~ t-.:;'~~-:'~:'~'] :~:~:"-""j ...-.. .~.~r;l ~~ nJ';."~' , t .u' if~ ~~ ~ ., . . . .. .' . ._ ....__ ....._..._.....:~_ __:=:::= _#' r ,. ". - - - --- : ! 'l.l'mq ~;=~;= u: ~= ~~! 'u' .::..;~; =- ; : ::. t . ! I :: H j= :IT: f= ....:. --.. ~1 ~ === :1 ~ 1fT. T'~ IIIJl CD ii'#I::::~:::::::":::::::::::(P:::'$:::(iJ ~ '= - flJtj ~ ~ ~ == t -1I;ilii;~r:~ -" ~ ~ - - -~.,... ....~;;;;;;..'#. ~- ~~J ~. ~( - u~,. It Ilin!lll: . . .... no..' [fi] 1001 .;;;~:;';*t:;'i;iIl ..u -:::::: :;);r~:: . ~ =- = .!~j:.:. :~~ ~ --' t = 2: ~.~... ,,_ ". ITJJ -, t if;; ide;::: i i tti ~;{>$~~:,\;..;~1'''''' ...- If .~. ,. ~Eit .. I.'.....~:.~.,......, ..... r..'.;................. '.. "'Ji! _d ~~~~: : :~'" . u. I;~- .>;:'"~";;;~ ~l~~~~' · t: ~1 -~-'...==- t~~' i;..:: ~i:~~ 't :: TJ L-- _.~~~; . ITT) .:.'EH <:... d' IJIlEI.T - ---" Plll.E:] D J"'. = _ - ~ ':. ~ ~ :~J 1--1 .:J.- ;:! I .. . Sftl: .... ... .. ..-... . --.. .. - r---- . . . . . . . . . . ! ~____J , , I' l.J z ... .. ~ -- - ----.... . . . . It(,u,....... - . 1-11-1 I WJIII/11jt:l ..-" - ... Locator PCA-80-5 CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE ALTERNATIVE TO ON-SITE MRIeING. 1('- f '7 ~-3 - -- -- = = I!!D -- -- 1 1.- J. m :-:~ J]11 im]1~;~1 . 1\>> ~ ~~.._.;.::.;.:.... r~.. rr-~. I.~ ;.: ..:. ~... -;:>I · '" _. 10 ROS~&HJ( Ir- ....... ..... ~ .... ,~ - .... .... ~ -~..._..- ._~. - - - -~~... '[ -=1 ~7'7:- YJ~~ f- ~ -- ----~' i _ t-i -~~~ ~ I . t ..., : , _~ _)( J '::I - ... :..,~ -~ _ - i----- f--: :::. . .--: r' ....:.-r >--~ IIIIII ....... ....-..- ..... 00 .... ' yy t:::::i L_ - ... I: : ., A I i I 51. . I . .. ; 6.: " . I; ,II -----_.~ __..~I= ..- I-- f- I-- ~'TT:... E Tf ;::: --. SIII!!'I T ~ ~.L~~"l ~~ -:-:-:; . i- ,. ....,.,..~ f- - -0- - ,.. - I I - , '- i""I .;..;.;.;.:: r\ \ 11 I : '->':'" _ ~ II..!. \. :t"'i l!f~ I I \ \~~ -- == I 11111 :1-1 1 ~ II;;!. .. ~rd~ ~~ , . =.. ..(...~':- j I' ..~ : : : : STR(F I 1\ II . I 11 i I ~:.-~.:.:-:~~~. . II ~ ; I" -- _.; t " 1;If --- ~ 1- >--4-( _- II C /TIlT III 1: 8ill ~:,:;od ~.:': ..:tt~.t.=:. .trfITT1_TfL t m.- .; ;.. ~':j. :... roi~.:~~ .V: m-..; . ~--_. ~~t ~j .. ... ..... .....,.. ... .... ..... . .'.. .... ... ..... .... ... ......4 .... .._ ..... .... ._~~.~~":_ _..___..-"---__ "'"~ ... ,__. _.. ~._. ~. _....... r -,," . .. - -1 r- f--- f-- "iT f--- f-- f--- f-..- - . - ~ :t:: T ""\ r -j . _'j 1PT . .;4::~\ J\1= ~$p@~ ... ----1.... a ._..__ - ~1t1 i 'z: ......;r- -= ~{xt ..-......t- -_ .1 )."'-'~ v r,l I I I : I ':"-- == == - ,-. r- . J!!!!I: I,.J -- ~~ .' .-.. :'.':.. - I 11 I = _::..-..:6-----. ....: u --_ rrr ~_:: == .- ':'- - -- ~- -:i __ __ >-..L- .. -- _z . -- ...... ,\ ~ _. f- _.. ..J -.. TT II _ f-- -.. ... . .. :~ _ -t:== '::.:...'::..:.:;~:' ::'---:". - TI TT :;:::::. .. ~ ll.J.. II TT II I I It.... ,..t ~...; I '" I T I~j~jj~j~jj~j~~~jjj~~~~jj~jj::~ -lOPARKWNINGCENDTISRTER-ICDTO,NTOWN :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: Scale: 1"= 800' ..-.. .... -_. ..- -- ..-... .. .--. -~- L...:-... H~~ RESOLUTION NO. PCA-80-5 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 19.62 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO OFFSTREET PARKING AND lOADING WHEREAS, the lack of offstreet parking in the urban core of Chula Vista has become a concern, and WHEREAS, the City Council directed the staff to evo.o'uate methods available foy' financing public parking and to !~ecommend a parking pian for' ,:fficial ajop- tion, and WHEREAS, an Initial Study, IS<-80-32, of possible adverse't:il.:ironmental impacts of a proposed amendment to the t-'iunicipal Code telating tt' offstreet parking. was conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator who concluded that the proposed amendment woul d not produce si gnifi cant envi rorunenta 1 effects and on December 24, 1979 recommended that the Planning Commissio;j adopt a Negative Declaration on the Initial Study, and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing to consider the proposed amendment, and WHEREAS, a hearing was held at said time and place, namely 7:00 p.m., January 9, 1980 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and the hearing was thereafter closed, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found that in accordance with the findings in the Negative Declaration on IS-80-32, the proposed amendment to the Municipal Code will have no significant environmental impact upon the environment, and adopted the Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOllOWS: 1. From facts presented to the Planning Commission, the Commission finds that public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice require the amendment to Section 19.62.040 of the Municipal Code to read as follows: 19.62.040 Alternatives to on-site parking. For any new non-residential use, structure or building, required off-street parking which, due to the size or location of the parcel, cannot be provided on the premises, may be provided on other property not more than two hundred feet distant by publicly available pedestrian access from said use, structure or building, subject to a binding agreement with the city as to permanent reservation of said space and access thereto; or if the proposed nonresidential use lies within the boundary of a parking district, off-street parking requirements shall be considered to be met provided that ;f- f' /FJ any developer of a new commercial building within a parking district, or a developer of a commercial addition to an existing building therein, shall pay the requisite fee established under the City Council's in lieu parking fee policy. 2. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that said amendment be adopted. 3. The Planning Comnrission further recommends the adoption of the "In lieu parking fee policy for Subarea 1 of the Chu~a Vista Town Centre Project Area No. 1" as set forth on the attached Exhibit A. ~. That this resolution be transmH'~ed to the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA this 9th day of January, 1980 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Comm1ssioners G. Johnson, R. Johnson, Williams, Pressutti, Smith, OINeill and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: None /;tJ ~^e W~"? ~ a, rma n ATTEST: :?~~___ .IJn~?~~.v / Secretary f144?