HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm min 1989/04/12 Tape: 297
Side: 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING
OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
7:00 p.m. Council Chambers
Wednesday, April 12, 1989 Public Services Building
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Carson, Commissioners Cannon, Casillas,
Fuller, Grasser, Tugenberg and Shipe
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Principal Planner Lee, Principal Planner Pass,
Environmental Review Coordinator Reid, Associate
Planner Griffin, Assistant Planner Herrara,
Senior Civil Engineer Daoust, Senior
Administrative Analyst Stokes, Deputy City
Attorney Fri tsch and Montgomery Consul tant
Lettieri
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - SILENT PRAYER
The pledge of allegiance to the flag was led by Chairman Carson and was
followed by a moment of silent prayer.
INTRODUCTORY R~.IARKS
Chairman Carson reviewed the composition of the Planning Commission, its
responsibilities and the format of the meeting.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MSC (Fuller/Casillas) Commissioners Tugenberg and Grasser abstained because of
absence from the meeting, to approve the minutes of March 22, 1989.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None
1. PUBLIC HEARING: PCA-89-5 CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW R-l-7 LOTS WHICH MEASURE LESS
THAN 60 FEET IN WIDTH TO MAINTAIN SIDE YARD SETBACKS
OF 5 FEET - CITY INITIATED
Montgomery Consultant Lettieri stated that the proposed amendment would allow
R-l-7 lots which are less than 60 feet in width at the front setback to
maintain side yard setbacks of 5 feet and 5 feet rather than 3 feet and l0
feet as presen~y required. The reason for this amendment is the pending
Planning Commission -2- April 12, 1989
reclassification of single-family areas wi thin the Montgomery Community from
County RS7 to City R-l-7 zoning. Many of the lots in Montgomery were
developed with a 5-foot setback on each side and the reclassification would
render them nonconforming with regard to established side yards. The R-l-7
standards were changed in 1969 from 5 feet and 5 feet to 3 feet and 10 feet to
provide vehicle access to the rear yard. Staff recommends approval for three
reasons:
1. As the width of a lot decreases, the total difference of 3 feet between
setbacks of 3'/10' versus 5'/5' becomes more of a constraint to
development.
2. The 5-foot difference in setback on one side would be a hardship to the
already developed lots.
3. The amendment would apply almost exclusively to developed lots constructed
with less than a 10 foot side yard and thus with no ability to utilize
vehicle access to the rear yard, which is the primary purpose of the 3
foot and 10 foot requirement.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was
opened. No one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MSUC (Shipe/Fuller) (7-0) that based on the Initial Study and comments on the
Initial Study and Negative Declaration, to find that this project will have no
significant environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on
IS-89-62.
MSU¢ (Shipe/Fuller) (7-0) to recommend that the City Council approve the
amendment to the City Code as shown in the staff report.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: PCM-89-14 - CITY-INITIATED PROPOSAL TO REZONE CERTAIN
TERRITORY, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY ARIZONA STREET, NAPLES
STREET, INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD, AND BROADWAY, FROM ITS
CITY-ADOPTED "COUNTY-ZONING" CLASSIFICATIONS TO THE
"CITY" CLASSIFICATIONS UTILIZED THROUGHOUT CHULA
VISTA. THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC REZONINGS, AND THEIR
PRECISE TERRITORIAL LIHITS ARE DEPICTED ON ATTACHED
EXHIBIT A.
Montgomery Consultant Lettieri indicated by use of the overhead projector the
general boundaries of the Harborside "A" subcommunity; namely, Arizona Street,
Naples Street, Industrial Boulevard and Broadway. Harborside "A" will be the
first subcommunity to convert from County zoning to City zoning in accordance
with the Montgomery Specific Plan. He noted that the Master Plan for the
Montgomery Area had been adopted by City Council in 1988 and a number of
community meetings have been held in the subcommunity. The rezoning proposal
had been considered by the Montgomery Planning Committee at a public hearing
on March 1, 1989 and its adoption had been recommended unanimously. The
recommendations outlined in the staff report are supported by the following
reasons:
Planning Commission -3- April 12, 1989
1. The zone reclassifications are primarily proposed to implement the
Montgomery Specific Plan adopted by Council on January 12, 1988. The
rezonings will assist in the protection of the residential enclave in
Harborside from the intrusion of incompatible uses.
2. The zone change from M52 and M54 to 1-L-P would prohibit any new outdoor
storage and sales yards which are not completely enclosed by solid walls,
fences, and buildings not less than 6 feet in height.
3. The zone change from M54 to R-3-P-9 is more compatible to adjacent
residential dwellings and to the Harborside ~ementary School. It would
also prevent expansion of the existing fertilizer plant and would allow a
density in keeping with that anticipated by the Montgomery Specific Plan.
4. The proposed zoning, with the exception of the parcel at the northwest
corner of Colorado and Naples (location of the fertilizer plant), will
convert the adopted City/County zoning to City zoning without adversely
impacting development capabilities of the properties.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened
Kay Everitt, 469 Emerson St., CV 92011, spoke in opposition to the Castle Park
area rezoning. In being informed that issue would be before the Commission on
May 10, 1989 and was not the subject of tonight's hearing, Ms. Everitt
withdrew from the podium.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
In response to Commissioner Casillas, Mr. Lettieri said that discussions have
been held with Mr. William Ellis regarding the fertilizer plant. Mr. Ellis
has offered no serious objection. In response to Commissioner Tugenberg, Mr.
Lettieri said that the plant site is approximately 1 acre in size.and would
normally be classified by the County for heavy industrial use. The proposed
reclassification to residential is in the hope of attracting more residential
use.
MSUC (Fuller/Casillas)(7-O) that based on the Initial Study and comments on
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration, to find this reclassification will
have no significant environmental impacts and to readopt the Negative
Declaration issued on IS-88-4M for the Montgomery Specific Plan.
MSUC (Fuller/Casillas)(7-O) to recommend the adoption of PCM-89-14 by the City
Council.
Commissioner Fuller commended staff for the smooth processing of the zoning
conversion so far.
Planning Commission -4- April 12, 1989
3. PUBLIC HEARING: PCM-89-15 AND PCS-89-6 - CONSIDERATION OF A
MODIFICATION TO THE RICE CANYON SECTIONAL PLANNING
AREA (SPA) PLAN AND A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP KNOWN
AS WOODCREST TERRA NOVA, CHULA VISTA TRACT 89-6,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIDDEN VISTA DRIVE AND
RIDGEBACK ROAD, NORTHERLY OF BEACON PLACE AND
WOODHOUSE AVENUE - WOODCREST DEVELOPMENT OF SAN DIEGO
Associate Planner Griffin indicated that the item included a modification to
the Rice Canyon SPA and a tentative subdivision map for 26.3 acres located on
the north side of Hidden Vista Drive and Ridgeback Road, northerly of Beacon
Place and Woodhouse Avenue. The site is located on a hillside with dramatic
views to the north and west. The property and surrounding areas are zoned
P-C, Planned Community, and are within the Rice Canyon Sectional Planning Area
of the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan. The property is a surplus junior high
school site and the project involves construction of 86 units and the
expansion of Terra Nova Park by the addition of 1.5 usable acres plus $850,000
in park improvements. The enhancement includes raising the lower 1.3-acre
park pad to the same level as the larger southerly pad, multi-purpose fields,
tennis courts, tot lot, viewing station, community gathering and picnic
facilities plus improvements to existing exercise course, equestrian trail and
hitching post. These plans have not finalized as yet and the Commission is
not being asked to vote on them. The developer is having community meetings
and has heard concerns expressed about lighted ballfields.
Mr. Griffin stated that 86 units on the 24.8 acres equated to a density of 3.5
du/ac which is consistent with the neighboring area. The lots are arranged in
tiers stepping down the site from southeast to northwest to take advantage of
the views. Two access points are provided, one on Ridgeback Road and one on
Hidden Vista Drive.
Mr. Griffin continued that staff has included conditions which relate to
landscaping and fencing and to developer-provided access to the ballfields
during construction plus provision of a temporary tot lot.
Mr. Griffin pointed out that issues of special note concern the setbacks and
view obstruction. The developer is requesting a 13 percent increase in the
number of lots with reduced sideyards (5 feet and 5 feet). Staff recommends
approval since all homes would have three-car garages and thus provide a less
cluttered street scene. One neighbor has requested that conditions be imposed
which would prevent an obstruction of the view at 506 Beacon Place and the
Commission may or may not wish to include a recommendation to Council on that
subject. Mr. Griffin concluded by saying that staff recommends approval based
on the findings and conditions as modified. He then introduced Environmental
Review Coordinator Reid.
Mr. Reid declared than an addendum had been issued to the Negative Declaration
because there was a great deal more information added about school capacities,
attendance and the like within the project service area including notice from
Southwestern Union High School District regarding three locatables to be
Planning Commission -5- April 12, 1989
provided for the Junior High and four for the Senior High. The Elementary
School District has sufficient capacity and the High School will have. The
use by the Junior High School of the relocatables and the creation of a Junior
High School in Rancho del Rey reduces the impact to less than significant.
Commissioner Cannon contended that three studies previously reviewed have
concerned these same schools and asked how the impact could be called
insignificant with regard to this particular project. Mr. Reid replied that
different elementary schools were being discussed. In response to other
questions, Mr. Reid replied that additional capacities in both the Junior
High and Senior High schools would be available prior to completion of the
project from funds the District already has and the developer has agreed to
participate in a Mello Roos District which will mitigate the long-term impacts
of the project on both Districts. Commissioner Cannon expressed appreciation
for the Opinion submitted by the City Attorney's Office on the subject of
School Fees. Deputy City Attorney Fritsch confirmed that the item before the
Commission could be considered on the basis not of a project but a special
plan amendment and the Commission had the facts and the leeway to justify a
decision to deny.
Commissioner Cannon questioned the traffic situation and the conclusion of the
EIR that the traffic impact was significant but mitigable. Mr. Reid pointed
out that the addition of the 860 cars did not result in a significant change
in the ADT level of service.
Commissioner Tugenberg recommended strongly that any development constructed
in the area should make provision in their CC&Rs to preclude RV parking.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Nick DeLorenzo, 1655 Murray Canyon Drive, San Diego, 92108, Gillespie
DeLorenzo Associates, noted the working relationship between the School
Districts, the City and the developer; commented that the design includes
housing with a density on the low end of the allowable density which will
enhance the Terra Nova Development and result in an average lot size of 10,000
square feet. The developer had proposed originally to lower the park site but
the community did not want the turf removed, therefore the decision was made
to raise the lower portion of the park site. The area is not in a previously
filled area but is the actual grade and will add 1.5 acres to the park size
for an expansion to 6 acres. Mr. DeLorenzo related the concerns of the
residents about lighted ball fields as one of the reasons why the park concept
would be considered separately. He informed Commissioner Carson that 450
persons had been noticed during the community meetings and that approximately
50 persons had attended. He volunteered that a temporary tot lot would be
provided as soon as possible. He informed Commissioner Tugenberg that the
developer would be happy to include a provision in the CC&Rs about the RV
parking. Commissioner Casillas inquired about the noise impact from the park
and how the project addressed Council's commitment to provide affordable
housing. Mr. DeLorenzo replied that the park site would be expanded to
include two ballfields but it is located 15 feet below the street so the noise
would be somewhat buffered. Mr. Griffin stated that the Rancho del Rey
Planning Commission -6- April 12, 1989
Specific Plan called for lower density and general high-end housing to
interface with the Bonita Area to the north, and that a site to the south was
committed to provide approximately 76 units of moderate income housing when it
develops.
Howard Sildorf, 1810 State Street, San Diego, introduced himself as the
attorney representing the Spectors, property owners at 506 Beacon Place, whose
home had been purchased with a "view premium" stipulation and whose view would
be obstructed by the development. He requested that a view easement be
conditioned on lots 56 through 60 to protect the Spectors' investment. He
proposed that those houses be moved forward on the property from the proposed
central lot location or, alternatively, that the height of the houses be
reduced from two stories to one.
Doctor Ida L. Spector, 506 Beacon Place, CV, 92010, said she had purchased the
home in 1986 because of the magnificent view. At the time of purchase they
had been told that a junior high school planned for the area might impact but
not totally obstruct the view. She added that the view covers a 180-degree
radius and they are willing to sacrifice the major part of it but requested
that the design of the 3-5 homes be revised so they can retain some view.
Commissioner Grasser asked if Doctor Spector had purchased a "view disclaimer"
and did the seller stipulate she would have the view forever. Doctor Spector
replied that she had not but at the time of purchase corner lots had to be
single level; that only 1/2 of her home is and it was sold as a view lot from
the first level; and it was represented as the last of the view lots because
of the proposed location of the junior high school.
Carlos Gonzales, 506 Beacon Place, CV, commented that their only intent is to
maintain their view of the skyline. They had met with the developer and the
City and had been told that the entire view would be lost except from the
5-foot level. His wife, Doctor Spector, is under 5 feet tall.
James Thompson, 513 Beacon Place, Chula Vista, said he was concerned regarding
the expansion of the Terra Nova Park but his understanding is that there will
be another meeting addressing those issues and will therefore speak to the
need to consider what traffic control devices will be used at Ridgeback Road
and Hidden Vista Drive, a site of many accidents.
Jim Milich, 1655 Murray Canyon Drive, San Diego, 92108, attorney for Gillespie
DeLorenzo Associates, commented that meetings had been held with the Spectors
and their attorney and attempts had been made to assist them. The property
had been owned by the School District, had been declared surplus and
developers had competed to submit a price and product. One of the features of
the process had included public meetings with exposure of the drawings
depicting the project. Nothing had been said about the views during that
time. Mr. Milich said it was impossible to determine in advance what a school
would like like; it was unfair to ask the developer to redesign his product;
in the interest of accommodating the Spectors they would be willing to
incorporate in condition "gg" that the project CC&Rs prohibit planting trees
that would obscure the view. He noted, however, that the views involved are
Planning Commission -7- April 12, 198g
private views not public. Mr. Milich submitted for the Commission's review
copies of the Community Meeting Notice of 8/3/88, an article about school
development, the proposed conditions "gg and hh" and a view impairment map.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Tugenberg commented that the developer apparently had done
everything possible to accommodate the community and the Spectors and that
this was not the first time the Commission had received appeals from persons
who had lost their views.
MSC (Tugenberg/Shipe)(5-2) Commissioners Carson and Cannon voting no, that
based on the Initial Study and comments on the Initial Study and Negative
Declaration, to find this project will have no significant environmental
impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration and the Addendum as submitted at
the meeting by staff issued on IS-89-53.
Commissioner Cannon said he was voting against the motion because, in his
opinion, t~,, Negative Declaration did not address the school impacts or
traffic on Street.
The Commissioner contended that the addition of the 800 daily car trips
anticipated by this project will further exacerbate the traffic situation on
"H" Street since traffic would have been generated otherwise within the Terra
Nova or Rancho del Rey Project Areas if a school had been required. In
addition, the Commissioner declared that portable classrooms take up needed
play areas and increase the density of the schools. He considered that to be
a significant impact which is not mitigated in the report.
The motion to approve the Negative Declaration carried by a vote of 5-2 with
Commissioners Carson and Cannon voting no.
MS (Tugenberg/Shipe) that based on the findings contained in Section "E" of
the staff report, to recommend that the City Council approve the modification
to the Rice Canyon SPA Plan and the tentative subdivision map for Woodcrest
Terra Nova, Chula Vista Tract 89-6, subject to conditions "a" through "z" and
"ff" through "hh".
A discussion ensued with Commissioner Cannon suggesting a modification to the
wording of condition "gg" to include an agreement between the developer and
the Spectors which would incorporate language to prohibit trees blocking the
Spector's view. Regarding the alternate suggestion by the Spectors that the
buildings be moved closer to the center of the lot, Mr. Griffin said the
location shown on the plans appears to be as close to the front of the
property as is allowable.
Planning Commission -8- April 12, 1989
AMENDED MOTION
MS (Grasser/Shipe) that Lots 56 to 60 be constructed as single-story
residences with a height not to exceed 16 feet. Motion failed by the
following vote:
Ayes: Grasser and Shipe
Noes: Fuller, Tugenberg, Carson, Cannon and Casillas
Abstain: None
Absent: None
The original motion failed by the following vote:
Ayes: Tugenberg, Shipe, Fuller
Noes: Grasser, Carson, Cannon, Casillas
Abstain: None
Absent: None
MS (Tugenberg/Casillas) that based on the findings contained in Section "E" of
the staff report, to recommend that the City Council approve the modification
to the Rice Canyon SPA Plan and the tentative subdivision map for Woodcrest
Terra Nova", Chula Vista Tract 89-6, subject to conditions "a" through "z",
conditions "aa through "ee" and with condition "ff" added as submitted at the
meeting.
The motion passed by the following vote:
Ayes: Tugenber9, Casillas, Fuller and Shipe
Noes: Grasser, Carson, Cannon
Abstain: None
Absent: None
BREAK: 8:40 to 8:46
4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-89-38 - REQUEST TO
ESTABLISH A TEMPORARY DAY TREATMENT FACILITY FOR
DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ADULTS AT 255 BROADWAY -
LIFETIME ASSISTANCE AND SERVICE'S, INC.
Associate Planner Griffin stated that the request is to establish a temporary
day treatment facility for developmentally disabled adults at 255 Broadway.
Commercial zoning is located on the north, south and west of the project with
Planning Commission -9- April 12, 1989
Multiple-family located on the east. The project site will be located at the
southeast corner of Broadway and Davidson in a building currently occupied by
Leo's Stereo. There are 22 parking spaces located to the rear with access
provided form Davidson as well as from an alley adjoining the rear of the
property. The exterior of the building would remain unchanged, however, the
interior would be modified.
The site would be used for 6 to 12 months while a permanent facility is being
constructed in the EastLake Business Center. Mr. Griffin indicated that there
would be a total of 24 to 40 adults accommodated instead of the 24 stated in
the staff report. The clients will be transported by vans so no additional
parking will be needed. In order to be assured of State and Federal funding
for the next fiscal year, the program must be in operation by June 30, 1989.
Staff recommends approval of the request with the one modification to reflect
40 instead of 24 clients.
Commissioner Carson inquired if the 6-month extension of the permit referenced
in condition "a" was a one-time extension or could extensions be given
indefinitely. She was informed that a one-time extension could be stipulated
if desired. The intent had been to provide leeway in case of delay in moving
into the permanent facilities.
Commissioner Fuller questioned the contradiction in the impact reported by the
two school districts. The High School District stated that fees are not
required and the Elementary School District said there is an impact on the
school situation.
In reply to Commissioner Tugenberg, Mr. Griffin indicated that some of the
clients come from Chula Vista and some from outside the community.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Bruce Baumgarten, Director of Lifetime Assistance & Services Associates, 14090
Mango Drive, Del Mar, 92014, explained that the clients are low-functioning
adults who are taught to do simple work such as sorting nuts and bolts. No
other facilities were being operated by his firm. He maintained that within
400 school children approximately 2 percent could be found to be functionally
disabled.
John Neibert, 260 Ash Ave., #1/2, CV 92010, spoke against the present parking
area being used for recreation as the traffic is very heavy on East Park
Lane. Mr. Griffin replied that a small covered patio had been proposed on
part of the site, and as indicated in condition "d", would be required to be
screened and so forth.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Shipe said he would vote against approval as the use was
incompatible with the neighborhood and he was not certain about the kind of
"treatment" offered.
Planning Commission -10- April 12, 1989
Commissioner Fuller said if the facility were for permanent use, she would
also vote against it. However, as it is for an interim period she would
support the project. She suggested, however, that close watch be kept on the
safety factors involved particularly with the egress on the side street and
the alley.
MSUC (Cannon/Tugenberg)(7-O) that based on the Initial Study and comments on
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration, to find that this project will
have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration
issued on IS-89-67.
MSUC (Cannon/Tugenberg)16-O) Shipe no, that based on the findings contained in
Section "E" of the staff report, to recommend that Council approve the
request, PCC-89-67, to establish a day treatment facility for developmentally
disabled adults at 255 Broadway subject to conditions "a" through "e" with
conditions "a" and "b" modified as follows:
a. The pemit is approved for 1 year, to expire on April 12, 1990. A
single 6-month extension may be granted by the Zoning Administrator
based upon a finding that circumstances have not materially changed
and that plans for a permanent location are proceeding expeditiously.
b. The use shall operate within the parameters outlined in the
application without the prior written consent of the Zoning
Administrator; namely hours of operation between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00
p.m., and a maximum of 15 staff and 40 clients at any one time.
5. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-89-39 - REQUEST TO
ESTABLISH A MANUFACTURERS GROCERY OUTLET AT 650 "L"
STREET - CANNED FOODS, INC.
Associate Planner Griffin explained that the item is a request to establish a
manufacturers grocery outlet within 23,000 square feet of an existing light
industrial building at 650 "L" Street in the 1-L zone. The entrance to the
facility would be on the east side of the building facing an existing parking
area for 86 cars. The loading/receiving area would be on the opposite side of
the building facing a parking area for 33 cars. The outlet would generate
approximately 1,000 customers and 500 cars per day. Parking need is estimated
at 75 spaces which, based on the present allocation for the building, is
adequate. A recommended upgrade in the landscaping may reduce some of the
parking and a condition has been recommended that the applicant reduce the
customer service area if necessary to meet these parking standards. It is
suggested that modifications be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator with
appeal to the Design Review Committee. Staff recommends approval of the
request with a modification to condition "a" to indicate the hours of
operation on Saturday and Sundays.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Planning Commission -ll- April 12, 1989
Greg Geertsen, 1717 Harrison St., San Francisco, CA, representing Canned
Foods, Inc., expressed concern about the lid/square foot required by the
school district. He said it was his understanding that the stipulation would
not be part of the conditions of approval but would need to be worked out
between himself and the school district.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MSUC {Tugenberg/Fuller) (7-0) that based on the Initial Study and comments on
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration to find that this project will have
no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration issued
on IS-89-66.
MSUC (Tugenberg/Fuller){7-O) that based on the findings contained in Section
"E" of the staff report to recommend that Council approve the request,
PCC-89-39 to establish a manufacturers outlet at 650 "L" Street subject to
conditions "a" through "c" contained in the staff report with condition "a"
changed as follows:
a. The use shall comply with the parameters outlined in the application in
terms of the division of the space {17,400 square feet sales/5,600 square
feet non-sales) and hours of operation (9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and lO:O0 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. on Sundays) without the prior written consent of the Zoning
Admi ni strator.
OTHER BUSINESS
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Principal Planner Lee said that the next Workshop (April l~th) would include a
presentation on Rancho San Miguel Property.
He referred to the schedule of major project distributed to the Planning
Commission calling attention to the two special meetings scheduled for May 19
and 31st. These are required because of so many major projects coming on line.
COMMISSION COMMENTS
Commissioner Shipe said he would be in Seattle at the time of the April
19th Study Session.
Commissioner Grasser said she would also be out of town on the 19th.
Commissioner Tugenberg said there was a possibility that he might be out
of town also.
Planning Commission -12- April 12, 198g
Commissioner Cannon remarked that the Ba.vfrent developer's comments were
not responsive to the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission.
ADJOURNMENT AT 9:22 p.m. to the Study Session of April 19, 1989, at 5:00 p.m.
in Conference Rooms 2 & 3
Ruth M. Smith, Secretary
Planning Commission
WPC 6200P