HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1979/12/18 Item 05, 05aCITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No. 5,5a
For meeting of 12-18-79
ITEM TITLE
SUBM TTED E
ITEM EXPLAP
A. BACKG
Public hearing -Consideration of precise plan for the development of a 3.84
acre parcel in the 1000 block of Industrial Boulevard in the I-P zone
Resolutiongggl - Approving the precise plan for development of 3.84 acres
in the 1000 block of Industrial///B'ou~~~levard
y Director of Planning
TION (4/5TH'S VOTE REQUIRED YES_ NO X )
Th applicant has submitted a precise plan for a two-phase industrial development
of a 3.84 cre parcel located on the west side of the 900 block of Industrial Boulevard
oppo ite M ss Street in the I-P zone.
On November 28, 1979 the Planning Commission adopted the Negative Declaration on
IS-8 -17 w ich is herewith forwarded to City Council for adoption.
B.. CJISCUS91ON
t zoning and land use.
Nort -P Truck crops and single family dwellings
Sout h-H-P Mobile home park
East ounty Railway and industrial
West - Interstate 5 freeway
Existing site characteristics.
he su 'ect aroperty is a level 3.84 acre parcel presently used for truck crop farming.
The ite i developed with a single family dwelling, detached garage, two storage sheds
and bill and which is located on the southwest corner of the property. Industrial
Boul vard i paved and there is curb and gutter in front of the property, but there is no
side alk. here is a wooden fence along the southerly property line for the first 120
feet and a hainlink fence from that point, which also extends around to the rear (west)
prop rty li e.
KGL:ie
Resolution X
PCM-80-10
EXHIBITS -
Ordinance_
ise Plan ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
(continued on supplemental page)
Plat X Notification List_
Attached Submitted on
FI
STAFFC RECO(~MENDATION Concur with Planning Commission recommendation
BOAR /COMM SSION RECOMMENDATION
On ovember 28, 1979 the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to adopt the Negative
Resol tion n IS-80-17 and to recommend approval of the precise plan for development
in ac ordan e with Resolution PCM-8Q10
COUNQIL
c~
b
- ~ ,~ ---
,.,,
~,: .,
~ . i ~, •~~
Form A-113 (Rev. 5/77)
AGENDA ITEM N0. 5, 5a
Meeting of 12-18-79
Supplemental page No. 2
posed development.
a. The applicant proposes to develop the property in two phases. The first
phas will involve the removal of the two storage sheds, garage and billboard; however,
the Ingle family dwelling will remain. Proposed for construction during Phase I is a
60,1 2 sq. ft. one story (22 feet high) industrial building which will be used as a
whol sale ppliance distribution center. The 132' x 456' building, which includes a
show oom, ffices and warehouse space, will be located 15 feet from the south property
line (the ode requires a 50 foot setback adjacent to residential areas), 30 feet from
Indu trial Boulevard and a minimum of 20 feet from the freeway. The required 60 off-
stre t par ing spaces will be located on the north side of the building and will be
serv d by single two way driveway located between the house and the industrial structure.
The emaintng area to the west of the house will be either landscaped or used for farming.
b. The second phase, which is scheduled in 5-10 years, will involve the construction
of a 19,04 sq. ft. warehouse addition at the northwest corner of the original building.
The dditi n will cause 39 parking spaces to be removed, along with the single family
dwelling. he area occupied by the dwelling will be devoted to 58 parking spaces, bringing
the otal arking to 79 spaces. The amount of parking meets the requirements of the code
for he 79 232 sq. ft. structure.
Architecture and signing.
he bu ldin9 is a conventional industrial building
conc ete. he exterior color will be light beige. Thy
Wort side of the building, will be painted spice tan.
medi m bro ze plate glass windows and a portion of the
text red c ncrete. Wall signs measuring 4' x 25' (100
and est e evations.
C. ANALYS
constructed of smooth face, painted
warehouse doors, located on the
The front elevation will have
building will be sandblasted
sq. ft.) are proposed on the east
Th proposed structure represents a standard industrial design, devoid of any
significan architectural features. However, the building is very clean in appearance
and ppear to be quite functional for the proposed use. The proposed setbacks will
provide am le landscaped areas to soften the otherwise plain exterior. The exterior
buil ing el vations should be enhanced by the appropriate use of accent colors. An
exam le of this can be seen in the industrial park across the freeway from the subject
prop rty.
Th Planning Commission referred the oroject to the Design Review Committee
for rchit ctural and exterior color approval. The committee's findings will be reporting
orally at he City Council meeting.
will
trav
they
no c
will
resi
amou
for
matu
request for a reduction in the required 50 foot side yard setback to 15 feet
ersely affect the adjoining mobile home park use which has R.V. parking,
ers, and storage located adjacent to the common property line. In addition
number of large oleander shrubs located along the property line. There are
on the south side of the building and the landscaping, once mature, will
xterior of the building. The building, being north of the mobile home park,
ect sunlight available to the park. The zoning wall which is required between
and industrial zones should be waived since a solid wall would reduce the
r and light available to the plant materials in the side yard. Landscaping
yard area should have 24" box trees and shrubs in 15 gallon size to create a
rance as rapidly as possible.
of a
tra
are
Wing
the
of a
ntia
of
e si
ine re
applicant
away from
be 1 ndsca
buil ing a
air ecess
that side
acti ity.
ction in the required 50 foot side yard setback to 15 feet will enable the
orient the loading docks and activity areas associated with industrial use
~e adjoining residential use. The 15 foot setback will permit the area to
d with plant materials which will soften the exterior appearance of the
the waiver of a zoning wall along that property line will provide light and
y for the growth of such plant material. Since no openings are located on
the building, the adjoining property will not be subject to any adverse
Th Planning Commission recommended the installation of a 6 ft. high fence adjacent
to t e nor side of the driveway between the single family residence and the industrial
building t provide screening from the parking during the operation of phase I.
qA~'I