Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1979/11/27 Item 09i,l i Y Uf- l,IiULH V1JIH COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. 9 For meeting of 11/27/79 ITEM'TITLE Resolution 9g~ r -Accepting CPO's lower income housing need and allocation formula for Chula Vista for 1980-1985 SUBMITTED BY Directors of Planning and Community Development ITEM EXPLANATION (4/5TH'S VOTE REQUIRED YES_ NO X ) A. BACKGROUND 1. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Organization (CPO) has prepared a "Housing Allocation Formula" for the several municipalities of the San Diego region. The formula, which is based upon the demand for lower income housing which each city or the county contributes to the regional demand for such, determines each jurisdiction's "fair share" of the overall responsibility to provide lower income housing between 1980 and 1985. 2. The CPO Board of Directors will consider the Draft Housing Allocation Formula on December 17, 1979, and CPO's staff has suggested that the County and its several cities officially consider the "San Diego Region (1980-1985) Lower Income Housing Needs and Housing Allocation Formula" by November 30, 1979, in order that the Board of Directors might study and evaluate their input. CPO's staff has provided a model resolution to facilitate local adoption of the draft formula. 3. The Planning Department, in conjunction with the Community Development Depart- ment, has reviewed the draft formula and the fair share allocation assigned to the City of Chula Vista. The following recommendation and evaluation are predicated upon this review. 4. Mr. Michael h1cLaughlin of CPO will address the Council on the subject matter during the meeting of November 27, 1979. B. ANALYSIS 1. According to the draft formula, the City of Chula Vista should endeavor to meet 5% of the region's lower income housing needs between 1980 and 1985. This percentage is equivalent to 1,308 lower income housing units. However, CPO, the United States hm (continued on supplemental page) EXHIBITS Agreemen t Resolutions Ordinance _ Plat _ Notification List_ Other CPO Materials ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Attached Submitted on FINANCIAL IMPACT None STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt resolution accepting CPO's lower income housing need and allocation formula as Chula Vista's fair share allocation. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION COUNCIL ACTION ~~~ i,~~,~~i: cr :~ia Dc;t2d ~~- 2 ~~ AGENDA ITEt1 N0./ Meeting of 11/27/79 Supplemental page No. 2 Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the California Department of Housing and Community Development recognize that the said fair share allocation is an ideal goal, and expect only a demonstration of good faith. Chula Vista's good faith demon- stration would entail this municipality's earnest endeavor to provide 320 to 330 lower income housing units during the 1980-1985 period. 2. CPO's staff, in its analysis of September 28, 1979, notes that Chula Vista has provided 322 Section 8 housing units in the 1975-1980 period and is committed to the provision of an additional 100 units of public housing. This figure translates into 5.3% of the total lower income units added to the region in the said period and provides evidence of this city's resolve to meet the housing needs of its low and moderate income residents. In fact, CPO's staff observed, in its said analysis, that "During the next five years, if Chula Vista could provide a similar effort, it should be able to meet its fair share of the regional need for lower income housing." 3. The Planning and Community Development Departmsnts are of the opinion that the draft formula and the fair share allocation assigned to Chula Vista are supportable and equitable. If this city can meet the challenge of the draft allocation plan, the socio-economic picture in the Chula Vista Planning Area would substantially improve. 4. The Departments are also of the opinion that CPO's draft allocation plan is an excellent work and manifests much responsiveness to the people and municipalities of the region. 5. The draft allocation plan is consonant with the City of Chula Vista's Housing General Plan Element and would, in particular, implement of the element's major action programs, entitled "Housing for Low and ~-1oderate Income Families and Program for the Establishment of Balanced Communities." Furthermore, the draft allocation plan is consistent with Chula Vista's Housing Assistance Plan (HAP), which is a part of the city's Block Grant effort. ~~~~ COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING ORGANIZATION Suite 524, Security Pacific Plaza 1200 Third Avenue San Diego, California 92101 October 11, 1979 (714) 236-5300 Mr. James Peterson City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, Ca. 92010 Dear Mr. Peterson: The Housing Allocation Formula recamlends that each jurisdiction respond to the leer incalle housing needs of the San Diego area in similar propor- tions to the demand for lower income housing that each jurisdiction con- tributes to the region. The formula consists of two elenertts: (1) an identification of the region's total lacer incaRe housing needs; and (2) the means by which those units should be equitably distributed throughout the region. The draft of the formula was accepted for distribution by the CPO Board of Directors and the formula, and subsequent revisions, have been circulated for review and oamlent to all member agencies' staffs. Since the CPO Board of Directors should act upon the formula at its meeting on December 17, 1979, CFO requests your consideration of this matter no later than Novmlber 30, 1979. A sample resolution has been attached which recommends that each city and the County approve a resolution which recognizes the regional lower income housing needs and adopts the jurisdiction's "fair share" of the total allocation. An analysis that identifies the implications of the formula and suggests same potential programs that could address the jurisdiction's need is also included for your wnsideration. The reaffirmation of a oortr mittnent first made by the Canprehensive Planning Organization in 1974 will not only provide an essential part of each jurisdiction's housing element, but will also address a crucial part of the regional housing needs. The CFO staff is prepared to provide any additional assistance, including the neo- essary presentation(s) of the formula. if the staff at CFO can provide any additional assistance, please contact Michael McLaughlin at 236-5373. Sincerely, RICHARD J. HUFF Ekecutive Director RJH:MM:rw Attachmen~ SAN DIEGO REGION'S COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Member Agencies: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, EI Cajon, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City. Oceanside, San Diego, San Marcos, Vista, and County of San Diego/Ex-officio Member: California Department of Transportation/Honorary Member: Tijuana, 8. CFA. SAMPLE RESOLUTION OF THE CPPY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE REGIONAL HOUSING ALLACATION FORMULA WfIEREAS, on November 18, 1974, the Canprehensive Planning Ocyani- zation adopted a Regional Housing Allocation Formula for the period 1974 to 1980; and WHEREAS, the original formula relied upon the 1970 census and other information available at that time; and WHEREAS, the effective period of the original formula (1974-1980) is about to lapse; and WHEREAS, the member jurisdictions are submitting (revised) housing elements for approval by the State Department of Housing and Crnmunity Development; arc? WHEREAS, the housing element guidelines identify the need to be responsive to the housing needs of the region; and WHEREAS, the State Housing Guidelines require each jurisdiction to identify its "fair share" responsibility as part of its housing element; and WtIEREAS, the Comprehensive Planning Organization has identified the lower incase housing needs for the San Diego area based upon the 1975 census and other more current information; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Planning Organization has developed a housing allocation formula which recommends the "fair share" of lower incrnie housing needs for each jurisdiction as part of the San Diego region's total lower incxrne housing need; and WHEREAS, the adoption of the Housing Allocation Formula would provide a step in a locally developed method of addressing lower incase housing needs; NGW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Chula Vista recognizes the San Diego Reyion (1980-1985) Lower Incase Housing Needs and Housing Allocation Formula; and BE TT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Chula Vista adopts its "fair share" allocation of 5.0 percent and 1,308 units as part of the total l~~r incase housing need (1980-1985) of 37,681 units. ~^ u / -l °~~ COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING ORGANIZATION Suite 524, Security Pacific Plaza 1200 Third Avenue San Diego, California 92101 (714) 236-5300 CITY OF CHULA VISTA September 28, 1979 The allocation formula recommends that Chula Vista provide five percent of the lower income housing needs of the region during 1980 to 1985. This translates into 1,308 unite of lower income housing that would be needed to meet the lower income housing need in the City by 1985. However, in order to demonstrate a "good faith... to provide for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community", as generally defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Chula Vista should be expected to provide about 320 to 330 units of lower income housing over the next five years. Over the past five years (1975-1980), Chula Vista has provided 322 units of existing Section 8 (lower income rental assistance) resources and 100 units of new construction in conjunction with public housing. These 422 units represent 5. 3 percent of the regional total of additional lower in- come housing units made available to the area from 1975 to 1980 (excluding Community Development Block Grant financed rehabilitation). During the next five years. if Chula Vista could provide a similar effort, it should be able to meet its fair share of the regional need for lower income housing. Those programs which appear to be most appropriate would be (in order of feasibility): New construction of lower income rental units (Section 8) through HUD/CHFA resources. Continued use of the lower income rental assistance program for existing housing (Section 8, Existing). Continued development of Community Development Block Grant financed loans or grants for the rehabilitation of lower income housing. t~~~/ SAN DIEGO REGION'S COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Member Agencies: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista. Coronado, Del Mar, EI Cajon, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City.Oreanside, San Diego, San Marcos, Vista,.and County of San Diego/E z-officio Member: California Department of Transportation/Honorary Member. Tijuana, B. CFA. (hula Vista Development of programs to address substandard/deteriorating mobile home park sites. Redevelopment programs which could provide additional newly constructed lower income housing (CDBG financed/City bonds/etc.). USe of the California Housing Finance Agency's lower income rental assistance program for elderly/handicapped households ("Aftercare"). Use of lower income rental assistance program to stimulate the sub- stantial rehabilitation of rental housing (Section 8, Substantial Rehabilitation) through HUD/CHFA resources. The following chart may be useful as a guide to deliberations regarding the type of housing mix that should be considered: Lower Income Families in Chula Vista a. Existing number 9,153 b. Ahm~ber if regional 10,363 average existed Elderly Households in Chula Vista a. Existing number 3,974 b. Ninnber if regional 4,515 average existed Large Families in Chula Vista a. Existing nurnber 3,660 b. t3wnber if regional 3,730 average existed G ~j~~ i" 2- COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING ORGANIZATION Suite 524, Security Pacific Plaza 1200 Third Flven ue San Diego, Califo mia 92101 1714) 236-5300 REGIONAL HGUSING NEIDS The Board of Directors of the Comprehensive Planning Organization (CPO) adopted the San Diego Regional Housing Plan in November, 1974. An important part of the Plan identified the regional housing needs and developed a guide for local jurisdictions to equitably distribute lower income housing within the jurisdiction. This is accomplished through the Housing Allocation Formula which recommended that each jurisdiction's share of the regional need for lower income housing be in similar pro- portions to the demand for lower income housing that each jurisdiction contributes to the Region. The needs and factors comprising the formula are being revised by CPO for two reasons: o The time frame (1974-1980) of the original fornnzla will soon expire and the data and information upon which the original formula is based need to be updated and revised; and o The jurisdictions in the San Diego region are required to prepare, or update, their housing elements by January, 1980 in accordance with the California Department of Housing and Community Development guide- lines, which also require the localities to identify their "fair share" of the regional housing needs as part of their housing element. The Recommended Housing Allocation Formula consists of two major elements: The identification of the Region's total lower income housing needs from 1980 to 1985 and the means by which those units can be distributed. 1. The number of additional lower income housing units that are needed to meet all the lower income housing demand by 1985 consists of the current unmet demand and the projected (1980 to 1985) demand as a result of growth of lower income households in the region. It is not practical to expect, nor is CPO suggesting, that the San Diego area should produce enough lower income housing to satisfy this entire need by 1985. How- ever, the needs do identify the magnitude of the problem that the region must continue to address through each jurisdiction's efforts. It also provides a measure by which the jurisdictions can compare their responsi- bility as part of the regional effort. Both the California Department of Housing and Community Development and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development have generally recognized "good faith efforts to provide for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community" as those which would address n Cj about five percent of the housing needs per year. According to those SAN DIEGO REGION'S COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Member Agencies Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, EI Cahn, Imperial Bey 1 , I a Mesa Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, San Diego,San Marcos, Vista, and Coumy of San Diego/E s-officio Member. California Department ~f tranx:o rtatio n/Honorary Membeo Tljua na, B. CFA. page 2 standards and the needs, the proposed lower income housing required for the San Diego area would be 9,500 to 10,000 units over the next five years. In the past five years, the region has provided 8,000 units of lower income assisted housing (Not including CDBG Funded Rehabilitation) units. The third page of this report contains a more detailed analysis of the implications of the formula for each jurisdiction. The second part of the formula is the allocation process by which the lower income housing is recommended to be dispersed. The factors measure each jurisdiction's share of lower income households, housing and employ- ment as a percent of the region along with lower income housing performance and unsound housing conditions. Thus, the lower income housing needs are distributed to each jurisdiction in accordance with these indicators of "Fair Share." The housing needs statement and the allocation formula can be used by each jurisdiction to evaluate the adequacy of the community's programs designed to address the lower income housing needs, especially in the context of the State Housing Element requirements. In addition, the allocation formula serves as a regional approach is which a community can assume its "fair share" with the knowledge that all of the communities in the San Diego area will also assume their "fair share". The alternative to a fair share formula developed by, and accepted by, the San Diego Region's communities, working in concert with each other, may be the use of such a formula generated by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. ~~ ~~ SAN DIEGO REGION 1980-7985 ~G ,~~ ~D" ~o ~c 3m~ C v m`~ ^~^t° m Q °Jw ~O S C Fm d~ ~ m Q' mom Ja ° 4i Zo ^p~.`mD mt4 O Q r.°j^`° m4J~ m LOWER INCOME HOUSING ALLOCATION ~ . wy ~ a ~o J,~o C Joy `oC C~oC Coema m~eC~~ m~ JQ ~ Qo h 44m`~ h 4m` ~~ 5 °jW `m '~Q ^P 0 0 o~ m°j mC Q' R~ v° 8° ~~h 2 ~r ^~^~~O m Q o m ~ ~° y°~ ogr me oJy.°°j G o ohm Vo k ,r ¢~~ ,Z, ti~ m m D C4 ~ ` ~. $ m C ~o C m m° a m° V° m` J" 3m V° o ~ \o C o C ~' .moo `C *~ .C ~° `C ~ $ o o ~ ~ om; O mp' t t~ m~ ~ pC r l ~ 0` .`OC v a \ • °C Om V' °~t 3m y, K . .$m °mC~ . 3m "~ ^0 3m. C 3 w D . m ..'° ", C C°j~` ma~~ v°am~ + ° `~ o~ry ~ oy `~ .off o mJ~ ~° °~ Q~ Jq`~c m m° 0y C c ~<o Q. ^~ oo ,2. 4t° Q y p° rbf° P 4t°.r° ;~` m`c' ^°j .~ m~4m r`°f C~0 ^°a ma r.°f.Cm' JC m '~°f. CO' ~°f~°i D Q (' ~ Q h Jam `. ^y .5 p Jy. ^4) °F ~O Jr' 4~ p °o ^p^P Pm ^~^~0 \40 ^pf ~ ^pW~° ^p~ `CU ^0 ~,o ^o) \CCr,.C Carlsbad 1.1 3.6 2.0 1.9 4.1 2.5 810 231 579 246 825 41 Chula Vista 4.4 4.9 4.9 4.5 6.2 5.0 1,620 422 1,198 110 1,308 65 Coronado 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.7 1.8 1.1 360 39 321 33 354 18 Del Mar 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 100 0 100 24 124 ~ 6 EI Cajon 4.6 3.6 3.9 3.9 2.4 3.7 1,200 362 838 698 1,536 77 Escondido 4.0 4.1 3.6 3.9 2.8 3.7 1,200 442 758 445 1,203 60 Imperial Beach 1.7 0.3 1.0 0.5 -0.7 0.6 190 112 78 41 119 6 La Mesa 2.6 3.3 3.1 2.6 4.4 3.2 1,040 246 794 190 984 49 Lemon Grove 1.0 1.0 1.2 0.8 1.5 1.1 360 28 332 112 444 22 National City 3.5 0.3 1.8 2.9 -2.1 1.3 420 644 0" 381 381 19 Oceanside 4.3 5.5 4.2 3.3 4.1 4.3 1,400 269 1,131 822 1,953 98 San Diego 53.4 33.9 45.8 59.7 28.1 44.2 14,350 4,605 9,745 7,217 16,962 848 San Marcos 0.6 2.7 1.3 1.1 3.0 1.7 550 103 447 50 497 25 Vista 2.3 2.7 2.2 1.6 2.0 2.2 710 93 617 279 896 45 Unincorporated 15.6 32.9 23.6 12.4 42.1 25.3 8,210 411 7,799 2,296 10,095 505 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 32,520 8,007 24,737 12,944 37,681 1,884 O ~ ~J ~/ O5 `J \J \J ~J ~~ ~~ ~~ ' Difference in totals between columns 7 & S have to be adjusted for 224 unit "surplus" in National City. "Due to rounding of percents in column 6 (100.2%) a lower number 132,470 vs. 32,520) had to be used in order for the total column 7 to equal 32,520 (The Regional Housing Need) units. Rounding may cause column totals not to equal 100% Revised: October. 1979. ~' 6' ~~ TABLE oME: SAM DIEGO REGION 1975-1985 Lower Income Balance Fair Share Lower Income Percent "Fair Share" Lower* Percent Increase Percent Households 1975 of Region Income Fbuseho ld_s 1985 of Region 19?5-1985 of Region Carlsbad 2,400 1.1 6,100 2.0 3,'00 4.1 Chula T"is to 9,200 4,4 14,800 4.9 5,600 6.2 Coronado 1,A00 0.9 3,40C 1.1 1,600 1.8 Del hhr 600 0.3 900 0.3 300 0.3 E1 Cajon 9,700 4.6 11,900 4,0 2,200 2.4 Fscordi do 8,400 4.0 10,900 3.6 2,500 2.8 Imperial Peacc 3,500 1.7 2,900 1.0 - 600 - 0.' La Diesa 5,500 2.6 9,500 3.1 4,000 4.4 Lemon Grove 2,100 1.0 3,500 1.2 1,400 1.5 National City 7,300 3.5 5,400 1,8 - 1,900 - 2.1 Oceanside 9,100 4.3 12,800 4.3 3,700 4.1 San Diego 112,800 53.4 138,300 45.8 25,500 28.1 San Darcos 1,200 0.6 3,900 1.3 2,700 3.0 ~'is to 4,800 2.3 6,600 2 ? 1,800 2.0 Unincorporated 33,000 15.6 71,200 23.6 38,200 42.1 211,400 100.0 302,100 100.0 90,700 100.0 Rounding Da}- Cause Colunm Totals Sot To Equal 100% SOURCE: L°;5 Special Census 8 Table 2, Occupied Housing Units by City, INFO 1977, Number 6, December 197i. * 39, 3a of 1985 Housing Unit Forecast: Total Lower Incase Housing Units 1975 (211,400) divided by Total Housing Units 19'5 (538,400) = 39.3$ September 19'9 TABLE ~nao: SAN DIEGO REGION ~~ 1975-1985 Occupied Housing Occupied Housing Percent 19'75 of Region Occupied Housing Percent 1985 of Region Occupied Housing Increase 1975-1985 Percent of Region Carlsbad 7,100 1.3 15,500 Z.0 8,400 3.6 Chula Vista 26,400 4.9 37,600 4.9 11,200 4.9 Coronado 6,300 1.2 8,700 1.1 2,400 1.0 Del Dear 2,000 0.4 2,400 0,3 400 0.2 E1 Cajon 22,100 4.1 30,300 3.9 8,200 3.6 Escondido 18,400 3.4 27,800 3.6 9,400 4.1 Imperial Beach 6,900 1.3 7,500 1.0 600 0.3 La Mesa 16,500 3.1 24,100 3.1 7,600 3.3 Lemon Grove 6,800 1.3 9,000 1.2 2,200 1.0 National City 13,000 2.4 13,800 1.8 800 0.3 Oceanside 19,900 3.7 32,600 4.2 12,700 5.5 San Diego 273,800 50.9 351,800 45.8 78,000 33.9 San Marcos 3,500 0.7 9,800 1.3 6,300 2.7 Vista 10,400 1.9 16,700 2.2 6,300 2.7 Unincorporated 105,300 19.6 181,100 23.6 75,800 32.9 Total 538,400 100.0 768,700 100.0 230,300 100.0 Rounding may cause column totals not to equal 100$. SOURCE: Table 2, Occupied Housing Units by City, INFO 1977, Nwnber 6, December 1977. September 1979. TABLE TERtEE: SAN DIEGO REGION R 1975-1985 Employment ~ Employment Employment Percent Employment Percent Increase percent 1975 of Region 1985 of Region 1975-1985 of Region Carlsbad 7,666 1.4 13,839 1.9 6,173 3.4 Chula Vista 25,472 4.8 32,272 4.5 6,800 3.7 Coronado 3,969 0.8 5,069 0.7 1,100 0.6 Del Mar 896 0.2 1,388 0,2 492 0.3 El Cajon 20,734 3.9 27,380 3.9 6,646 3.7 Escondido 18,185 3.4 27,666 3.9 9,481 5.2 Imperial Beach 2,896 0.5 3,581 0.5 685 0.4 La b~sa 14,170 2.7 18,619 2.6 4,449 2.4 Lemon Grove 4,083 0.8 5,508 0.8 1,425 0.8 National City 13,020 2.5 20,485 2.9 7,465 4.1 Oceanside 15,877 3.0 23,723 3.3 7,846 4.3 San Diego 326,451 61.7 423,888 59.7 97,437 53.6 San Marcos 5,200 1.0 7,938 1.1 2,738 1.5 Vista 6,076 1.1 11,072 1.6 4,996 2.7 Unincorporated 64,120 12,1 88,147 12.4 24,027 13.2 Total 528,815 100.0 710,575 100.0 181,760 100.0 Rounding may cause column totals not to equal 1000. SOURCE: CPO Series IV Projections and INFO '76, Number 6 (1975 Employment Estimates), October 1976. September 1979. TABLE FOUR: SAN DIEGO REGION 1975 - 1980 Assisted Housing Performance rea amers Home New Const. Rental (Sec. 8) Substantial Rehabiliation Rental (Sec. 8) Existing Rental (Sec. 8) Existing Rental Lease (Sec. 23) Public Housing New Const. California Housing finance Agency Total Number Assisted Units % of All L-I Units In Region of Region's L~I Units As Proposed By Housing Alloc. Formula Carlsbad 100 131 231 2.9 1.8 Chula Vista 322 100 422 5.3 3.8 Coronado 39 ~ 39 .5 2.7 Del Mar 0 0 .0 0.3 EI Cajon 362 362 4.5 2.9 Escondido 132 310 442 5.5 3.1 Imperial Beach 112 ~ 112 1.4 1.1 La Mesa 117 129 246 3.1 2.7 National City 151 493 644 8.0 1.6 Oceanside 269 269 3.4 3.5 San Marcos 80 23 103 1.3 1.0 Vista 93 93 1.2 1.4 San Diego (City) 1,333 2,404 698 170 4,605 57.5 51.7 San Diego (County) 32 . 219 188 439 5.5 25.4 TOTAL 244 1,484 0 4,863 131 798 487 8,007 700.0 100.0 Source'. Regional Com prehensrve Plan Implementation Survey (Jan. 19791, Regional Housing Plan Ilan. 19751. and Grantee Performance Reports (HOUSng Ass3 stance Provided) for Cities of Chula Vista, EI Caion, Escondido, National City, Oceanside, and San Diego and the Cuunty of San Diego. TABLE FIVE: SAN DIEGO REGION ' 1975 Unsound Lower Income Occupied Housing vZ ~S~ Dilapidated F, Inadequate Original No Response Total Deterioriating Construction Adjustment Unsound Housing Carlsbad 219 42 -15 246 Chula Vista 120 7 -17 110 Coronado 32 5 - 4 33 Del Mar 26 6 - 8 24 E1 Cajon 651 68 -21 698 Escondido 426 65 -46 445 Imperial Beach 39 4 - 2 41 La D1esa 225 23 -58 190 Lemon Grove 145 15 -48 112 National City 381 25 -25 381 Oceanside 806 32 -16 822 San Diego 7,292 547 -622 7,217 San Marcos 44 14 - 8 50 Vista 270 41 -32 279 Unincorporated 2,195 310 -209 2,296 Total 12,871 1,204 -1131 12,944 SOURCE: Table 19, Household }leads by }Iousehold Income and Condition of Housing, INFO '76, Nwnber 8, Volumes 1 - 15, October 1976 (using 0 - $10,000 income totals). September, 1979. .9 ~~~ TABLE SIX: SAN DIEGO REGION Ilousing Allocation Formula Housing Assistance Plans Comparison HAP Goals 1 Year 3 Year HAF Goals 1 Year 3 Year Assisted Housing Performance 1975 - 1979 ** Chula Vista 483 1,275 66 198 422 E1 Cajon 648 1,948 78 234 362 Escondido 175 850 62 186 442 La D1esa 136 611 52 156 246 National City 830 1,875 20 60 644 Oceanside 127 580 98 294 269 San Diego 4,100 12,290 879 2,637 4,605 Urban County * 2,075 6,226 686 2,058 1,017 8,574 25,655 1,941 5,823 8,007 * Includes: ihiincorporated, Carlsbad, Coronado, Del Mar, Imperial Beach, Lemon Grove, San Marcos, and Vista. ** Includes: Farmers Home, Section 8 (new and existing), Public Housing, and CHFA; Does Not include GDBG funded rehabilitation assistance. SOURCE: HAP Goals from Sth Year CDBG Applications. September 1979. TABLE SEVEN: n SAN DIEGO REGION ~6S 1975-1985 Population \ Population Population Percent Population Percent Increase Percent 1975 of Region 1985 of Region 1975-1985 of Region Carlsbad 19,400 1.2 36,300 1.8 16,900 3.6 Chula Vista 75,100 4.8 97,100 4.8 22,000 4.6 Coronado 18,100 1.2 25,900 1.3 7,800 1.6 Del filar 4,700 0.3 5,600 0.3 900 0.2 E1 Cajon 60,000 3,9 75,000 3.7 15,000 3.2 Escondido 49,200 3.2 67,400 3.3 18,200 3.8 Imperial Beach 20,800 1.3 21,300 1.0 500 0.1 La Mesa 42,400 2,7 54,900 2,7 12,500 2.6 Lemon Grove 20,100 1.3 24,900 1.2 4,800 1.0 National City 44,200 2.8 47,700 2.3 3,500 0.7 Oceanside 55,300 3.6 78,100 3.8 22,800 2.8 San Diego 770,300 49.5 -931,700 45.8 161,400 33.9 San Marcos 9,900 0.6 22,900 1.1 13,000 2.7 Vista 28,300 1.8 40,100 2.0 11,800 2.5 Unincorporated 339,000 21.8 503,500 24.8 164,500 34.6 Total 1,556,800 100.0 2,032,400 100.0 475,600 100.0 Rounding may cause coliamt totals not to equal 100$. SOURCE: Table 1, Total Population by City, INFO '77, Number 6, December 1977, September 1979.