HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1988/08/02 Item 12
.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
I tern z.6'
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 7t29188
Public Hearing: PCZ-88-0 - Consideration to prezone 1.11
acres adjoining the EastLake Business Center to P-C Planned
Community zone - EastLake Development Company
Ordinance ;;':1.77 Prezoning 1.11 acres to P-C (EastLake
Business Center District BC-2)
Director of Planning ~~ SECOND READING AND ADOPTlON
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
City Manager ~r,.{~ff)-~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes No x )
--
The request is to prezone 1.11 acres adjoining the northerly boundary of Lots
13, 14, 15 and 44 of the Eas tLake Bus i ness Center to P-C Pl anned Communi ty
zone (EastLake Business Center District BC-2).
The Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial Study, IS-88-66, of
potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the
project. Based on the attached Ini ti al Study and comments thereon, if any,
the coordinator has concluded that there would be no significant environmental
.impacts, and recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on
IS-88-66.
RECOMMENDATION: Concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On July 13, 1988, the Planning
Commission, by a vote of 6-0, adopted the Negative Declaration issued on
IS-88-86 (which is herewith forwarded for Council review and adoption), and
recommended that Counci 1 enact an ordi nance to prezone 1 .11 acres to P-C
(EastLake Business Center District BC-2) as shown on Exhibit A.
DISCUSSION:
The proposal area is a level, triangular piece of property which measures 926
ft. in length and 104 ft. in width at its widest point. The property abuts
the northerly boundary of Lots 13, 14, 15 and 44 within the EastLake Business
Park, and would be used to expand the depth of those lots. All four lots are
expected to be consolidated in order to accommodate a single light-industrial
user. The prezoning would place the property in the P-C zone subject to the
BC-2 (Business Center Manufacturing Service District) regulations of the
EastLake I SPA Pl an. The property is presentl y zoned S-87 (County Limited
Control Use zone).
The areas to the north, south and west are presently vacant. The property
directly to the east is being developed with a self-storage facility. The
a.ots which would absorb the additional acreage, as well as the areas to the
~ast and west, are desi gnated BC-2 (Busi ness Center Manufacturi ng Servi ce
District) on the EastLake I SPA Plan. This district is intended as an area
for light industrial and limited service commercial uses. The area to the
north (Salt Creek Ranch) is presently zoned S-87, but is proposed for
residential development at 6-11 du/ac on the General Plan Update.
.
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date
~19
7/26/88
or allow to be used a reproduction or facsimile of the great seal of the
State. Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 1.08.010 prohibits the use or
allowing the use of any reproduction of or facsimile of the seal of the City
"for any commercial purpose unless previously authorized by the Council".
However, the current ordinance inaccurately describes the City seal, and does
not prohibit misuse of the City logo. The alleged misuse was of the logo, not
the seal, nor does it appear that Rev. Flaugher's use of the City notice of
the meeting of the Mobilehome Issues Committee vias a reproduction for a
commercial purpose, and therefore would not constitute a violation of Chula
Vista Municipal Code Section 1.08.010 as currently constituted.
A similar problem arose at the State level two years ago, and a bill adding
provisions making it criminal to use a reproduction or facsimile of the great
seal of the State or other seal, logo, insignia, emblem or sYmbol of any State
agency, department, office, board, commission or other State body in campaign
Ii terature failed in the State Legislature. A similar bill (S8 2650) was
introduced by Senator Kopp on February 19, 1988, and is currently pending in
the State Legislature. It does not appear to address the problem, but is
again addressed to the use or reproduction of a facsimile of the great seal or
other logo in campaign literature. However, it has some language which might
be useful.
The proposed amendment to Section 1.08.010 will broaden the definition of the
.ype of matter reproduced or made a facsimile of, as well as make it
onsistent with the State provision relating to abuse of the State great seal.
The proposed ordinance will:
a) Accurately describe the new (1985) official seal;
b) Codify the official City logo; and
c) Make illegal any malicious misuse of either the official seal or the
official logo.
4388a
.
by te City
Date~hU~;{;ni3
Dated