Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1979-9881Form No. 344 r ' Rev. 2-79 RESOLUTION NO. 9881 follows: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT 80-7, CASA DE LA CIUDAD The City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds as That in accordance with the attached Negative Declara- tion, IS-79-30 , and the findings therein, the proposed tentative map will not have a significant impact upon the environment, and the City Council hereby certifies that the Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista has heretofore approved that certain tentative map of a subdivision to be known as Chula Vista Tract 80-7, Casa de la Ciudad and has recommended that the City Council approve said tentative map subject to the conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No.pCS-80-7 adopted on the 14th day of November , 1979, a copy of which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof the same as though fully set forth herein. NOiA, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve said tentative sub- division map in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. PCS-80-7 Presented by Approved as to form by D. J. terson, Director of George Lindberg, Ci' Attorney Planning ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 11th day of December 1979 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Councilmen McCandliss, Scott, Gillow, Cox, Hyde NAYES: Councilmen None ABSENT: Councilmen None ATTES~tiiiri/ , /// ~ /Ai ~A/J~ // _ City Clerk- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) / ` . A n P4ayor of th~~e City of~Vista I, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED City Clerk ~IE~ATiVE ~E~LARATION PROJECT TITLE: Casa de la Ciudad Project Location: North side of Moss, 450 ft. east of Broadway Project Proponent: Mabie & Mintz 6280 Riverdale St. San Diego 92120 CASE N0. IS-79-30 A. Project Setting DATE: November 29, 1978 The project involves approximately 1.21 acres of property located on the north side of Moss St. about 450 ft. east of Broadway. The southern portion of the site is currently vacant and void of any significant natural resources. There are several storage structures located along the northern portion of the site. Adjacent development entails mixed residential uses to the north and south, multiple family dwellings to the east and a motel to the west. The northern portion of the subject property is within an existing drainage easement associated with the Telegraph Canyon Creek floodway. The creek's 100 year flood plain extends to about 60 to 90 ft. south of the property's northern limits. The balance of the site is a portion of an island above the reaches of the flood plain. B. Project Description The applicant proposes to construct an apartment project which will house 38 one bedroom units. Forty-eight on-site parking spaces will be provided and a landscaped swimming pool-recreation area is planned. (The pool will be heated by a solar energy unit.) The site plan submitted by the applicant indicates that the northern most building line of the proposed structure will be located approximately 9 ft. from the existing drainage easement and a 6 ft. masonary wall will be erected along the easement boundary. C. Compatibility with zoning and plans The subject site is currently zoned for R-3 development with the exception of a 6 ft. strip along the western limit which is zoned C-T. The applicant has requested the rezoning of this strip to R-3 which will conform to the on-site high density residential land use designation of the General Plan. J~ 9 ~ D. Identification of environmental effects 1. Soils A soils report prepared for this project has indicated that expansive soils are present on-site. Recommendations submitted by the soils engineer will be required to be implemented to avoid substantial impact. 2. Drainage The Telegraph Canyon Creek crosses the project site along the northern border. Currently, there is a 20 ft. drainage easement within the creek's floodway, 10 ft. of this easement is located on-site. Also, the creek's 100 year flood plain extends onto the project by 60 to 90 ft. The Telegraph Canyon Creek drainageway has been the subject of study by the City and the Army Corp of Engineers for several years. Recently, a plan to substantially reduce the potential flood hazard within this flood plain was proposed. The plan entails the expansion of the existing 20 ft. drainage easement to 40 ft., 19 ft. along the northern limits of the subject project site. A 22 ft. rectangular concrete channel would be installed, 11 ft. of which would be located on the project site as well as an S ft. berm to prevent construction to close to the channel which could have the potential to damage the channel wall. Since a portion of the site is subject to inundation in the event of a 100 year flood, residential finished floor elevations will be required to be constructed above calculated flood water levels. The proponent has indicated that a hydrology study is currently being prepared to determine finished floor elevations. Also, due to the projects location within a floodway under study, all improvements within the flood plain should be coordinated with the City Engineer to insure that no substantial flood hazard to life or property will occur. 3. Schools The local junior high school is currently operating in excess of capacity. Additional students, if generated from this project will further the burden on existing educational facilities. The developer will be required to obtain written assurance from the Sweetwater Union High School District that adequate classroom space will be available to new students. 4. Parks & Recreation The project is located within a city park district which is void of dedicated parkland. Fee's in-lieu of land dedication (due to scope of project) will be required by the City to contribute toward the future purchase of parkland within the district. ~~~/ 5. Traffic A study of the traffic volume utilizing the Broadway and Moss St. intersection was conducted during early 1978, and concluded that the volume satisfied signal warrants, 6 of the necessary 8 hours. Additional traffic such as the increase estimated to occur due to the proposed project may result in the intersection meeting the warrants for signalization. The proponent will be required to contribute toward the signalization of the Moss St./ Broadway intersection. E. Mitigation necessary to avoid significant impact 1. Incorporate the soil engineers recommendations into the project. 2. Raise residential finished floor elevations above flood water levels: 3. Incorporate the recommendations of the hydrolic engineer into the project:. 4. Coordinate imporvements within the floodplain with the City Engineer. 5. Obtain written assurance of classroom space for new students from the Sweetwater High School District. 6. Payment of park fees in lieu of land dedication. 7. Participate in the signalization of the Broadway and Moss St. intersection. F. Findings of insignificant impact 1. The project is void of any significant natural or man-made resources. There are expansive soils on-site and a major drainage course and flood plain cross the property, however, hazards due to these adverse conditions can be mitigated to an acceptable level. 2. The proposed rezoning and land use are in conformance with the General Plan's land use element. Zf mitigation discussed in Section E of this Negative Declaration is incorporated into the project, no long term environmental goal will be adversely affected. 3. Potential impacts can be mitigated to an acceptable level and no impact which could interact to create a substantial cumulative effect on the environment is anticipated to occur. l ~ VJ J 3 4. The project is not anticipated to generate any substantial traffic related noise or emissions, nor is any health hazard expected to occur. G. Consultation 1. Individuals and organizations City of Chula Vista Planning Dept. D. J. Peterson, Director of Planning Public Works Dept. Bill Ulrich, Assoc. Eng. Gary Hansen, Traffic Eng. Fire Dept. Ted Monsell, Fire Capt. Environmental Control Commission Peg Donovan, Commissioner 2. Documents a. Draft Telegraph Canyon Creek Information Brochure U.S. Army Corps of Engineers b. Flood Hazard Boundary Maps - HUD-FIA c. IS-78-83 Arizona Apartments d. Soils Report for IS-79-30 Wm S. Krooskos & Assoc. e. City of Chula Vista General P lan & Elements f. Enrollment & Capacity figures for Sweetwater Union High School District. The Initial Study 'Application and evaluation forms documenting the findings of no significant impact are on file and available for public review at the Chula Vista Planning Dept., 276 4th Ave., Chula Vista, CA. ~~1 ENVIRONN~7TAL REVIEW COORDINATOR ~ ~~/ EN 3 (rev. 5/77) 4 RESOLUTION .10. PCS-80-7 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COP1~IISSION RECOh44ENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT 80-7, CASA DE LA CIUDAD WHEREAS, a tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 80-7, Casa De La Ciudad, was filed by Mabie & Mintz, Inc. on September 14, 1979 for the construc- tion of 38 units in a one lot condominium project on the north side of the 500 block of Moss Street, and WHEREAS, Section 66473.5 of the State P1ap Act provides that approv a of a subdivision map shall be based upon findings of consistency between the subdivision map and the adopted General Plan of the local jurisdiction, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place far a public hearing to consider said tentative map, and notice of said hearing, with its purpose, was given by the publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least 10 days prior to the date of said hearing, and ';;HEREAS, a hearing was held at said time and place, namely 7:00 p.m., November 14, 1979 in the City Council Chambers before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed, and ~1HEREAS, the Planning Commission found that this project will have no sig- nificant environmental impact and adopted the Negative Declaration on IS-79-37. N041, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. From facts presented to the Planning Commission concerning the develop- ment, the Commission finds as follows: a. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposed development conforms to all standards established by the City for such project. b. The design of the subdivision will not affect the existing improvemerrs streets, sewer, etc., which have been designed to avoid any serious health problems. c. The subdivision is consistent with the General Plan Elements as follows; 1. Land Use Element - The General Plan designation for the site is high density residential, 13-26 dwelling units per gross acre. The density of the project of 32 units per net acre is consistent with this designation. 2. Circulation Element - The adjoining street will. be improved to handle the traffic flow. R- 98h~ 3. Housing Element - The construction of 38 condominium units will offer an expanded choice of home ownership. Since the development contains less than 50 units, it is exempt from the requirement to address the need to provide for low and moderate income families. 4. Conservation, Open Space, and Parks and Recreation Elements - No parks are planned on the site and the developer will be assessed fees in lieu of park land dedication. 5. Woise Element - The property is not subject to objectionable noise levels. 6. Seismic Safety and Safety Elements - The deg-elopment is not adjac- ent to or on any known fault systems. 7. Scenic Highways Element - The site does not abut a Scenic Highway or gateway. 8. Bicycle Route Element - Ne bicycle routes are proposed adjacent to the site. 9. Public Buildings Element - flo public buildings are proposed on the site. 2. The Planning Commission recommence to the City Council that the tentative r.ap for Chula Vista Traci 80-7, Casa Oe La Ciudad, be ap?roved, subject to the folloe~ing conditions: a. The owner/subdivider shall be responsible for the relocation of the existing fire hydrant in accordance with CVDS 8. b. The owner/subdivider shall grant to the City the 9 foot wide drainage easement (adjacent to an existing 20 foot wide drainage easement along the northerly side of the property) shown on the tentative map as "Future 9 foot drainage easement." c. The owner/subdivider shall construct one-half width of the channel adjacent to the property. He may request a deferral since there is an anticipated Corps of Engineers drainage project. If deferred, his contribution would be approximately $20,000. 3. That this resolution be transmitted, along with the tentative map, to the City Council, and a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANNING COPIMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this ]vth day of November, 1979 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Commissioners G. Johnson, Stevenson, O'Neill, Smith, Pressutti, R. Johnson, and Williams iJOES: None ABSENT: None ((fi~t ATTEST: G~ ~'b /'/ J~ `~~.,~~2. ~'.1.r_`aE-mil- 1/(/~ a((t//rm~aJn Secretary ~~ ~ G~~ O R3 ,- ~ -_ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \\ ~ ~ \\ \ 1 \ ~ \ ~ \ `~ \ ~ ~ ~ \~ ~\tf0`MFOX ~ \ ~_ `SFO \ \ ~ MFO \ ~ ~~ `y ~\ ~ \ MOSES R_v ~ ~ r` ,.- _ ' ~ ~~~ G-T ,, i ~ .A ,\,,_- \ <' ~L,,, ,,, ,~ ,- ~: ,- ~~ ~' ~ i ~~ `` gZ. .~ Y r' ~~__ ~ i S~~ P~~Zeq~P \ '~ ~ ~" MFO 0 A~~pQ~ 'C ~~ i ~ c/ ~tC _. k ._ \ ~~ a~ ~ \ ~` C \ ~ \, \\ \ ~~~ Ly ~'/\ / ,- ,,, ' \ o' io15' zoo' ~ ' ®~ ~ ~ ' ~ ,, ,- i ' ~ i . ' i' ~~ /'r ~rJ ~'~~`/, Y.~p`1 Y~~~/ TENT. SUB. MAP FOR A 38 UNIT CONDO.-500 BLK. OF MOSS ST. i C S~• \` ~ ~ i .q~ '~ ~, .~ ~, , ~- ,- Y, ,- L-' ~ ~~,_ ~, ~~a~ ~c~ ~~ ~.~ CASH DE LA CIUDAD CONDOMINIUMS Northeast Comer of the Intersection of Broadway and Moss Streets Chula Vista, California Prepared For MABIE AND MINTZ General Contractors 6280 Riverdale Street San Diego, California Owners Prepared By BRIAN PAUL & ASSOCIATES, AIA 1250 Sixth Avenue, Sutte 1200 San Diego, California 92101 Architect G ~' ~~ ~~ -_~H~.~iN~L - <_ ~ 3f~,AroE 4 P.a`a C~> _+ -- n 51E ~ C~P~IrIE'f%~ i i' lo' 20' 30' DWELLING ' STORAGE ~ OTHER TOTAL UNIT N0. ADJACENT ROOM CARPORT ' LOCATION STORAGE - i __~-106 Ft.3 67.4 Ft.3, - -- --- - - 173.4 Ft3 2 -,+-- 106 Ft,3--__ 67.4 Ft~- - -- 173.4_Ft3- _ 3 _ _- 106. Ft. _____ 67.4 Ft__. ____ __ 173.4 Ft _ - - - --- - - 4 106 Ft 67.4 Ft.3 173.4 Ft3 _ 5 _106 Ft.3 67.4 Ft. -______ ~ 173.4 Ft3 6 106_ Ft -- 67.4 Ft.3 - - - 173_.4 _ Ft3 7 106_Ft.~-- --67.4 Ft,3 - --- - - - 173.4 ~t3_ ---- - - 3 -- -- -- - 3 - ---- -- - -- - -- 3 8 106 Ft. _ _ __ 63~: _ _ _ 169.0 t _ 10 _ _106 Ft. 63 Ft.3 169_.0 Ft3 11 - 106 Ft.3-- - - 63 ~t.3 169.0 Ft3 _ - - - _ 12 _ 106 Ft - -- 63 Ft.3 - - - 169.0 Ft3 ~ 3 ~ 106 Ft. 3 - - - _ - - E < Ft. 3 - - _ 169.0 Ft''~ ------ -- - - _14 _-__.-lOf~_~ _ __ - 63__Ff.3 ~~.0 Ft _ 15 _~___ 65 Ft ~ _ __ _ 165.0 Ft.3 _ _ _p30.0 Ft~_ _16 _ 65 Ft~- 71.0 Ft. _ *106_Ft.3_ 242.0 Ft 17 ~ 106 Ft. 11.0 Ft.3_ 177.0 Ft3 --- 18 _ 106 Ft.3-- ' 71_.0 Ft. ~ ---- -- - - - 177.0 Ft3 _19 __ r 106 Ft.3 71.0 Ft.3~- - _ 177.0 Ft3 ' 3 - ~- 3 - - --- - - - 3 20 __ 106 Ft. 11.0 Ft -__ ___ _ __ _ 177.0 Ft _-10 ~3 71 0 1`t 3 3- 3 3 - -- - -- - - - --77.0 Ft _ ~Ob~t. ~.~~ 17 .0 Ft3 23 ~ 106 Ft.~--- ~.0 ~3 _" ------ ----177.0 ft3 24 106 Ft.3 _ 71.0 Ft.3 ---_ ~- 177.0 Ft3_ _25 li5 ~ _ 165.0 Ft.3 _- 230.0 Ft3 F* ~ -- -- _26 ~ ~Ft ~ ~__ 79.0 _Ft.3 - ** 106 Ft.3 _250.0 Ft3 27 106 Ft 3 ~ 79.0 Ft 3---- - 185.0 Ft3 ~1 b~.3 -- - - 63 Ft.3_ 3 - _ 169.0_ Ft - --- - - _29 _ r_ __106 Ft 3 - ___- 63_Ft.3 ..- 169.0 Eta 33~_~- lO6 Ft~ ~- - --- 63_ Ft.3 - --_ ~69.b Ft3- 106 Ft.3 ---- - 63 Ft. - - --I69 ~~t 3--~ j ~3 63 Ft. _ __ 169.0 Ft3_ 34 ~ lOb~t. _-` 3 169.0 Ft3 -:__ 6 t . 3 3- - 106 Ft. _ _ _ _ --~_ ' 63 Ft. ~- -- . --.___~6~..b~t _ 36 _ 106 Ft. 63 Ft.3 169.0 Ft~ 37 - 106 Ft 3-~ -- - 63 Ft.~ ----169.~t3_ 38 ~ _ 10( Ft ~ ~ .-- 63 F~ - - _ _ -T69.a >`t3- ~~ ~ IO t --- -_ ---_63 Ft.3 ~-- - -- 169.0 Ft3_ __-- _ 40 -- _ _ -- - -- -_ _106_ Ft..- - 63 ~t.3 --- - - --- 169.0 Ft *Storage Cabinet @ Laundry **Storage Cabinet @Storage Room .~ I ;'," ~~~\ ~r'r~l~~ll ~ ~ fi il lE ~ ~ ern n ~ ~~ ~__~ ~: I.i~,~ ~~, ~\ ~~ r ~r ~~ ~~^ ~ fl~ ~a.~-~~l Li~i~ ,.~ O~ -~~__