HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1980-10033Revised 3-26-80
RESOLUTION NO. 10033
follows:
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
CHULA VISTA TRACT 80-11, VISTA ARIZONA
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds as
That in accordance with the attached Negative Declara-
tion, IS-78-83, and the findings therein, the proposed tentative
map will not have a significant impact upon the environment, and
the City Council hereby certifies that the Negative Declaration
was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended.
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Chula
Vista has heretofore approved that certain tentative map of a
subdivision to be.known as Chula Vista Tract 80-11, Vista Arizona
and has recommended that the City Council approve said tentative
map subject to the conditions contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. PCS-80-11, adopted on the 27th day of February,
1980, a copy of which is attached hereto and by this reference
made a part hereof the same as though fully set forth herein,
and
WHEREAS, the Council certifies that it has considered
its decision in approving this tentative map on the housing needs
of the region and has balanced those needs against the public
service needs of the residents of Chula Vista and available fiscal
and environmental resources; the Council hereby determines that
this 12 unit condominium development will not adversely affect the
housing needs of the region but will partially satisfy those needs
without adversely affecting the city's ability to provide service
to the existing residents of the community and the new residents
of the project; the Council furthermore has determined that it
concurs with the Planning Commission's finding of no significant
effect on the environment from this one lot development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve said tentative subdi-
vision map in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No.
PCS-80-11.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that condition 2e of said Planning
Commission Resolution No. PCS-80-11 be, and the same is hereby
amended to read as follows:
2e. The developer shall be responsible for the con-
struction of the north half of the drainage channel
adjacent to the property. He shall pay to the City
the sum of $8,000 to cover the cost of construction
of said channel at such time as the Army Corps of
Engineers shall have completed plans for the total
construction of the channel. Said sum of $8,000
shall be paid by developer prior to the approval
of the final map and shall be nonrefundable.
Presented by
D. erson, Director of
Plan g
Approved as to form by
~* _ ~ -
George D. Lindberg, City Attorney
ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 18th day of March
19 80 , by the fdlowing vote, to-wit:
AYES' Councilmen Hyde, McCandliss, Gillow, Cox
NAYES~ Councilmen None
ABSTAIN: Councilmen None
ABSENT: Councimen Scott
ATTES
City Cork
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
1, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, GTY CLERK of the City of Chulo Vista, California,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of
2EVrSFn RESOLUTION N0. 10033 ,and that the same hos not been amended or repealed.
3/26/80
DATED
(seal )
o°~~
cc-sso
City Clerk
~ ' +~ w w .~ -a~ .~+ ++.
PSO.:~C^ ^___... Keyes Arizona Street Apartments
Pro.°c*_ ~.,~atic^: 577-581 Arizona Street
Proi_cc ?ro~o%cnt: Robert Keyes 470 Third Ave. Chula Vista
C:~SE ii0. IS-78-83 D„1~; July 13, 1978
A. Project Settinct
The project involves .42 acres of property located on the south
side of Arizona St. between Broadway and 5th Ave. The site is
currently developed :with 3 dwellings and is adjacent to two family
and multiple family homes.
The rear of the property involves a aortion of the Telegraph Canyon
Creek drainageway and is subject to inundation. There are no
significant natural resources kno:an to be present and the area
appears to be void of any significant vegetation.
B. Project Description
The proponent proaoses to remove the existing structures and con-
struct a 12 unit apartment building. The structure will be located
to the rear of the property and on-site parking for 22 vehicles
will be located adjacent to Arizona St.. Landscaping in accordance
with the City's Landscape D4anual :gill be required.
Grading Fer pad preparation will ?rimarily be e::port, however some
may be placed near the existing drainage channel on the southern
portion of the site.
C. Compatibility caith zoning and clans
The proposed project is in conformance with existing R-3 zoning and
the high density residential land use designation indicated on the
Ganeral Plan.
D. Identification. o_* environmental effects.
Drainage
The portion of the site adjacent r_o Telegraph Canyon Creek is subject
to inundation. Improvement of this drainage channel may be required.
A study to determine what the level of flood ~•aaters would be, and
at :chat ~1oor level the residential units caill have to be constructed
will have to be undertaken. This could result in a substantial
design chance.
, Schccls
The local elementary and junior high schools are currently over
capacity. ~dditional students from the project will further this
burden on educational facilities.
The developer ~.ai11 be required to obtain written assurance from the
appropriate school districts that adequate facilities will be
available to nec•r students.
Parks
The projec*_ is located within City park district no. 6.02 where there
are currently no park facilities. Park fees in lieu of land
dedication will be required by the City to contribute toward the
future purchase of parklands within this district.
... ~itication measures necessary to avoid
1. Drair.ace improvements to City standards and a flood
hazard study will have to be undertaken.
2. :•iritten assurance of rcom available from appropriate
school districts will be required.
3. Park fees in lieu of land dedication are also required.
F. Findings of insignificant impact
1. The project site is developed with dorellings and appears void
of am- significant natural resources. There are no known
geologic hazares within the immediate area.
Compliance ~.aith the reccmmendation of the flood hazard study
will avoid significant hazards due to inundation,
2. The proposed apartment building is in conformance with the
land use element of the General Plan and is not anticipated
to achieee short term to the disadvantage of long term environ-
mental coals.
3. Potential impacts can be mitigated to an acceptable level and
no impacts which could interact to create a substantial
cumulative effect on tiie environment are anticipated.
4. The project is not anticipated to generate any substantial
traffic volume orelated noise or emissions. No hazard
to humans is e:<pected to occur.
003
1
f
G. Individuals and organizations consulted
City os Chula ~iista Planning Dept.
Public ;dorks Dept.
Fire Dent.
Docu:^.ents
Flood Hazard Boundary i~?ap 8.01-11 (Dept. of Housing and Urban
Develoament - Federal Insurance Admin.)
IS-75-12
IS-75-21
IS=78-83
i
// i~
~o~~
RESOLUTION N0. PCS-80-11
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COPIMISSION RECOMP1ENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL THE APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISIOfJ MAP FOR
CHULA VISTA TRACT 80-11, VISTA ARIZONA
WHEREAS, a tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 80-11, Vista
Arizona, was filed by Christian f4. Galichon on December 27, 1979 to develop
a one lot, 12 unit condominium project at 582 Arizona Street in the R-3 zone,
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a public
hearing to consider said tentative map, and notice of said hearing, with its
purpose, was given by the publication in a newspaper of general circulation in
the city at least 10 days prior to the date of said hearing, and
WHEREAS, a. hearing was held at said time and place, namely 7:00 p.m.,
February 27, 1980 in the City Council Chambers before the Planning Commission and
said hearing was thereafter closed, .and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found that in accordance with the findings
listed in the Negative Declaration on IS-78-83 this project will have no signif-
icant impact.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. From facts presented to the Planning Commission concerning the develop-
ment, the Commission finds as follows:
a. The site is physically suitable for residential development and
the proposed project conforms to all standards established by the
City for such development.
b. The design of the subdivision will not affect the existing public
improvements and the existing drainage will be required to be
fmproved, thereby avoiding any serious health problems.
c. The subdivision is in substantial. conformance with the General
Plan Elements as follows:
Land Use Element - The proposed density of slightly less than
28 units is ih conformance with the General Plan designation for
this area of 13-26 dwelling units per gross acre.
Circulation - The adjoining street is improved to handle the
ry, present and ultimate traffic flow.
J Housing Element - The removal of two older units will reduce the
1~~ city's apartment inventory; hoi~^v~•° she new project will provide
additional housing and offer an expo; ~ d choice of owners-hip.
Since the project contains less than 50 units it J• Pxempt from
. providing housing for low and moderate income families.
Conservation, Open Space and Recreation Elements - No parks are
planned on the site and the developer will be assessed fees in
lieu of park land dedication.
Noise Element - The property is not subject to objectionable
noise levels.
Seismic Safety and Safety Elements - The development is not
adjacent to or on any known fault systems.
Scenic Highways Element - The site does not abut a Scenic Highway
or gateway.
Bicycle Route Element - No bicycle routes are proposed adjacent
to the site
Public Buildings Element - No public buildings are proposed on
the site.
2. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that the tenta-
tive map for Chula Vista Tract 80-11, Vista Arizona, be approved, subject to the
following conditions:
a. The owner shall grant a 7' foot wide easement along Arizona Street
to the City for street tree .purposes.
b. The existing driveway to be removed shall be replaced with mono-
lithic curb, gutter and sidewalk. The proposed driveway shall be
24 feet wide ahd an excessive width. driveway permit shall be
obtained prior to itS construction. The foregoing work shall .be
accomplished under a separate construction permit.
c. The CC&R's shall be amended to prohibit the installation of
.outside T.V. or radio antennas in accordance with the city code
(Article 2.6 of ,the CC&R's).
d. The owner shall grant to the City the 11 foot wide drainage ease-
ment (adjacent to the existing 20 foot wide drainage easement at
the southerly end of the property) shown on the tentative map as
".proposed 11 foot drainage easement."
e. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of the
north half of the drainage channel adjacent to the property. He
may request a deferral since there is an anticipated Army Corps
of Engineers drainage improvement project. If said deferral is
approved, then the developer shall post a bond with the City in an
amount to be approved by the City Engineer in order to guarantee
the installation of said improvements. Specifics of the bond
,shall be determined prior to consideration of the f: map.
_ ,~
f. Those areas of the subdivision which are subject to inundation
due to a 100 year frequency flood shall be delineated on the
final map.
g. A minimum distance of 6 feet shall be maintained between tine
,building and proposed retaining wall located at the northerly
edge of the drainage easement.
h. The applicant and/or all subsequent owners shall be obligated
for the construction costs for fencing as required by the
Director of Public Works and to perform all necessary grading,
provision of access, and landscaping as determined by the City
Planning Director within 60 days after completion of the
proposed drainage channel .along the South property line.
3. That this resolution be transmitted, along with the ,tentative map, to
t:he City Council, and a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant.
PNSSED AND APPROVED 6Y THE CITY PCAPINING COMMISSION OF GHULA VISTA, CALIFORFJIA
this 27th day of February, 19£i0 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Commissioners O'Neill, Williams, G;-Johnson, R. Johnson and Pressutti
NOES: Comm issioners Smith _and Stevenson
A65ENT: [.Jane'
ATTEST:
Secretary;
'/~
~~
Chairman
-3-
' I 3 Ji~d3~50"r7
O
r~
~ o
N
.~,~t1NDRY AUTO REP YAC .~ j i-~79
`
~ ~ ~.
~_
~ kRIZ~NA 511
o
"`"e2
._ _ :._~-_.~
y ,~. 7r
'
~
7 Atf70 REP SFD. MFD TDF 1N FD L; h a ._ .~ s
4
MFD
d ~
' ~
' h ...
I ; a SI E ~
N t
~,~ h
~
m
s 2
y
- ~~:
- f9
__ _
_
60
- . _ ~~
'
~
O
~ 6:
~
` `
O
~~ ;i MOTEL :VAC STORAGE
O 7 7. ~ N
L. \ ` ~
Y
.. .. _ _ _ .. N n---
. •, c
•a
*' ~
~
~ l
I T 0.2 V
~ ' T
1 ~.
yT~
~~ 7
\
i .
y •
.. ......
'
~ _ _ . ~.
_ o
soo' aoo
NORTti p~~
`b
Locator
Pcs-so- 11
VIS~'a, ARIZONA CONDOMINIUMS . _
12 UNITS .
582 ARIZONA