HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm min 1974/08/14 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
August 14, 1974
The regular meeting of the City Planning Commission of Chula Vista, California
was held on the above date beginning at 7:00 p.m. with the following members
present: Chandler, Rice, Rudolph, Wilson and Floto. Absent, with previous
notification: Member Starr. Also present: Director of Planning Peterson,
Current Planning Supervisor Lee, Environmental Review Coordinator Reid, Assistant
City Attorney Beam, and Secretary Mapes.
Chairman Chandler led the pledge of allegiance to the flag, followed by a moment
of silent prayer.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MSUC (Rudolph-Wilson) The minutes of the meeting of July 17, 1974 be approved as
mailed.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Consideration of request to defer undergrounding of utilities, 770 Monterey
Court, Joseph Stanley
This request is in connection with the construction of a single family house in
an improved R-1 area. Adjacent lots are served by overhead wiring; undergrounding
for this one lot would necessitate the removal and replacement of approximately
60 feet of sidewalk or street. The gas and electric company has indicated this
lot can be adequately served by existing facilities. The staff recon~ends approval
of this request subject to an agreement by the applicant not to oppose establish-
ment of an underground district at some future date and waiving any protests against
such a district.
2. Consideration of request for vacation of Moss Street between I-5 and Bay
Boulevard (PCM-74-1), Inland Industries, Inc.
Inland Industries, Inc. is proposing to develop 20 acres of land which includes
this street right of way. Street improvements have not been installed, however,
California-American Water Company has an easement for a water main and fire hydrant
within the right of way. The staff recommends that the vacation of Moss Street be
approved subject to the retention and continued use of the easement held by the
Califonia-American Water Company.
3. Consideration of conformance of location of San Diego County Youth Develop-
ment Center with Chula Vista General Plan
The State Government Code requires that the location of public facilities shall
be determined to be in conformance with the local jurisdiction's General Plan
prior to installation. The staff has reviewed the proposed development and con-
sidered the Environmental Impact Report on the project, and recommends adoption
of a motion finding that the proposed rehabilitation center is in conformance
with the Chula Vista General Plan.
MSUC (Wilson-Rudolph) The three items on the Consent Calendar be approved in
accordance with the staff recommendations.
-2- $/14/74
REGULAR CALENDAR
6. PUBLIC HEARING (Cont.): REZONING PCZ-74-H - l0 acres west of Otay Lakes Road,
660 feet north of H Street, C-T-D to P-C or R-3 and C-T
Chairman Chandler advised this item is being considered out of order on the agenda
due to the applicant's request that the hearing be continued for approximately
30 days.
MSUC (Wilson-Rice) The public hearing to consider rezoning PCZ-74-H be continued
to the meeting of September 25, 1974.
4. PUBLIC HEARING: EIR-74-8 on Princess Park Estates
Environmental Review Coordinator Reid reported that no input had been received
from the public or other agencies during the posting period of this report, which
covers a two-phase project: use of the site as a borrow pit, and eventual sub-
division of the property into residential lots.
This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. As
no one wished to speak, the public hearing was declared closed.
MSUC (Rudolph-Rice) The final EIR-74-8 be scheduled for Planning Commission
consideration on August 28, 1974.
5. Consideration of tentative map PCS-74-3 of Jay L Jay Apartments condominium
conversion, Second Avenue between Palomar & Quintard,
Greater Western Real Estate Investment Trust
Current Planning Supervisor Lee reported this is a request to convert a 480 unit
apartment complex into dondominiums. The property encompasses about 21 acres
and will be divided into 7 lots. The units are single story structures in clusters
of 4, 8 and 12 units. Mr. Lee advised that the major conflict seems to be in the
social impact of the project. Since as high as 60% of the residents receive some
form of government assistance, there is concern about the ability of these people
to buy a unit and remain in the area. At a selling price of $13,500 for one
bedroom and $15,000 for two bedroom units, the monthly pa3nnents would necessarily
be higher than the present rental figure. It is the staff's opinion that this
map does not conform to the Housing Element of the General Plan which states that
housing shall be provided for every economic and racial segment of the City;
however, the City Attorney has expressed the opinion that the Housing Element is
not specific enough in outlining how this goal would be accomplished, and therefore,
the map could not be denied based on inconsistency with the General Plan.
Mr. Lee called attention to the conditions recommended by the staff if this map is
approved. He noted that the Engineering conditions include a number of public
improvements, some of which could be accomplished through a 1911 Act District
which provides for lower interest rates. It is also possible that the City Council
may modify or waive some of the conditions if assurance is received that the
saving would be passed on to buyers of the units.
-3- 8/14/74
Mr. Lee suggested that the Commission recommend to the City Council the considera-
tion of these alternatives and also that this map be submitted to the Human
Relations Commission to obtain their input and recommendation to the City
Council.
Assistant City Attorney Beam confirmed that it is the opinion of the City
Attorney's office that this proposed development is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Chula Vista as presently written. He pointed out that by
virtue of that fact, some of the conditions included in the staff report are
no longer an issue. He suggested that the first condition which requires the
subdivider to submit evidence that the map is consistent with the Housing Element
of the General Plan be deleted. Mr. Beam advised that the applicant has some
ideas on how the public improvements may be financed in order to keep the
selling price of the units as low as possible.
Commissioner Rudolph expressed serious concern over the possibility of pricing
some of the residents of these apartments out of a home through this conversion.
She suggested that the City might be instrumental in forming some kind of
a cooperative.
Attorney Beam pointed out that the question before the Commission is the approval
of the tentative map based on its conformity with the General Plan. He concurred
that the Commission could suggest that the staff consider the alternatives
available in terms of participation by the City.
Clifton Reed, Attorney, lOlO Second Street, San Diego, appearing on behalf of
the applicant, advised that with the ruling that the map is in conformity with
the General Plan, the applicant has no objection to the other conditions which
pertain to installation of public improvements. They agree that these requirements
are necessary for the success of the project. He advised that Greater Western is
trying to make this conversion in such a way that the housing will be available
to those people presently living there without undue hardship. To this end,
Mr. Reed was authorized to contact the various State and Federal agencies to
help those people who might not be able to achieve ownership without assistance.
I~e also reported that Greater Western will take second trust deeds for 25 Or 30
year terms in order to hold down the payments. He advised that they are going
to request that public improvements be financed through the 1911 act or 1913 Act.
He expressed their intent to keep the price at $12,000 for the one bedroom units,
which would result in a monthly payment of approximately $135. He assured the
Commission the developer is committed to converting these units at a price the
existing tenants can afford as nearly as possible, and further, that the developer
is trying to carry out a project that meets the intent of the General Plan to
provide housing for low inc~ residents in this area.
The Commission discussed maintenance costs under a Homeowners Association as
compared to an apartment complex.
8/]4/74
Commissioner Wilson questioned the Engineering requirement for the removal of
Italian Cypress trees and their replacement with California Pepper trees.
Assistant Director of Public Works Robens pointed out that the existing trees,
located in rows perpendicular to the street, present visual restrictions for
cars exiting from the driveways and at the int '
of these trees Cs nec~:~- ~- ~ .... ersectlon. Since the removal
recommended that they~°~'~ ~n uruer co recmce the traffic hazard, it ~s
be replaced with pepper trees on 40 foot centers which can
be kept trimmed so as not to become a sight hazard.
Allen Jones,Subdivision Coordinator for San Diego Gas and Electric Co., lO1 Ash
Street, San Diego, called attention to a letter sent by that company expressing
objection to the conversion since the units are mastermetered, with only 3 meters
for the 480 units. Under State requirements a fee ownership condominium qualifies
as a premise which must be separately metered.
Attorney Beam pointed out this is not a valid concern in terms of approval of
the subdivision map and are not pertinent to the proceedings here tonight. He
Suggested that this matter be discussed with the applicant or his attorney.
Clifton Reed, attorney for the applicant, confirmed the requirement by State
law for individual meters and assured the Commission of their intent to comply
with that law and install individual meters for the units.
HSUC (Rudolph-Wilson) Recommend to the City Council the approval of the
Tentative map PCS-74-3 for the conversion of the Jay L Jay Apartments to a
condominium, subject to the conditions enumerated in the staff report with the
deletion of No. 1. The map is also referred to the Human Relations Commission
for their input and recommendedation, and further, that the City Council consider
with the applicant any means that the City can make available to enhance the
chances of providing low income housing in this project.
7. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL U~SE PER~IT PCC-74-20 - ReQuest for o eration
~h s~_?_r o era~ion
S~~o~'~ ,~l zone, 346~
Current Planning Supervisor Lee reported that the applicant is requesting
approval to use the existing education building of the Nazarene Church for an
elementary school. He displayed a plot plan showing the location of the
building well back from L Street behind the sanctuary, and well separated from
residential uses. The school would be in operation from 9:00 a.~. to 3:00 p.m.
with child care extended to include 3 hours before school and 3 hours after, so
the total operating time would be 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Mr. Lee noted there
is ample parking area on the site and it is proposed to use a portion of the
parking area for playground use. Tile staff recommends that an enclosed play-
ground area be provided for kindergarten students.
-' -5- -- 8/14/74
Mr Lee called attention to the request for a ground sign and the staff's suggestion
for the design of a 24 sq. ft. sign.
This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Ralph Lyons, 838 Floyd Avenue, questioned the feasibility of fencing a portion
of the playground area. He pointed out that the fence around the Rice Elementary
School is at the western lot line and access to the street is quite well blocked
by the sanctuary of the church, tie indicated that children playing outside
would always have supervision and he felt a fence would not be necessary. He
expressed concurrence with the other recommended conditions.
As no one else wished to speak, the public hearing was closed.
On a question from the Chairman, Director of Planning Peterson expressed the
opinion that some fencing may be desirable, but suggested that the Commission
may wish to reword the condition to make it discretionary with the staff,
working to meet the applicant's needs.
MSUC (Floto-Wilson) Approval of Resolution PCC-74-20 to allow operation of
week day elementary school classes in the educational building of the Nazarene
Church at 346 L Street, subject to the following conditions:
1. Subject to the approval of the Zoning Administrator, fencing of
a portion of the playground area may be required.
2. Prior to issuance of zoning permit or certificate of occupancy, the
applicant shall comply with the requirements of Title 19 of the California
Code, as set forth by the Chula Vista Fire Marshal, such compliance includes
limiting total number of students to the occupancy load specifically
approved by the Fire Marshal.
3. The hours of operation shall be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
on weekdays only. If at any time these hours or days conflict with
the Church operation the matter shall be reviewed by the Planning
Commission for possible modification.
4. A 24 square foot ground sign shall be permitted uith the design subject
to approval of the Zoning Administrator (reference Exhibit C).
Findings are as follows:
a. The proposed school will provide a desirable service to parents
who seek alternative education to the public school system. In this
particular location, the school will contribute to the general well-
being of the neighborhood and community by offering Day Care service
beyond normal school hours.
b. The school is located in, an area well separted from residential uses
by a major drainage channel, another school and a major road, so that it
will not be detrimental to persons or property in this vicinity.
c. Subject to the conditions of approval, the church school will comply
with the rules specified in the Zoning Ordinance.
d. As authorized by this conditional use permit, the church school conforms
to the R-~ zone and is consistent with the Chula Vista General Plan.
8. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Safety Element of General Plan
Chairman Chandler noted the recommendation in the staff report for continuance
of this public hearing to the meeting of August 28, 1974.
MSUC (Rice-$~ilson) The public hearing for consideration of the Safety Element
to be continued to the meeting of August 28, 1974.
9. PUDLIC HEARING: Consideration of Noise Element of the General Plan
Director of Planning Peterson advised that this ns one of the recently mandated
General Plan Elements which has been developed according to the guidelines of
the State. Results of the investigation with regard to noise indicate that
Chula Vista is a fairly quiet community and that the noisier areas are related to
vehicular traffic. Existing noise levels were measured at various street
locations and on the basis of traffic projections estimates were made of the
anticipated noise level. A comparison of the existing and projected noise
levels with the standards in the State guidelines revealed that with few
exceptions Chula Vista's noise levels are in conformance with the guidelines.
Mr. ?eterson pointed out that the major area of discrepancy relates to the
noise limits at General Roca Park, Bay General Itospital, Fredricka Manor, the
Municipal Golf Course, and at Hilltop and ~lemorial Parks. The noise level at
those locations are above the State guidelines of 45 DBA. Most of these sites are
on major thoroughfares and no feasible means has been found to reduce the traffic
on those streets.
Mr. Peterson noted that aside from fulfilling the State requirements, the real
value of this Noise Element is the information as to where the noisiest areas,
due to traffic, will be, so that appropriate conditions of approval can be
established at the time a development proposal is made.
This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. As no
one wished to speak, the public hearing was closed.
-7- - 8/14/74
Co~.~missioner Rudolph commented that she felt ~nany areas in Chula Vista have an
excesively hiqh noise level and that perhaps the guidelines or permissible standards
are set to high. She expressed the i~ope that the Noise Element ,might take a
more positive approach rather than accept things as they are. She noted that
the implementation plan did not suggest that the City buy an octave band analyzer,
although the report mentioned that some of the noise regulations are not enforced
because the City Does not have such an analyzer.
Mrs. Rudolph further pointed out that in the section on "Effects of Noise" no
mention was made of many of the physical effects of noise, although many studies
have been made which show that excessive noise effects b}ood pressure, mental
health, and many other things. She felt that it should be brought out in the
element that even though people may become accustomed to hearing the noise and
feel that it doesn't bother them, it may still effect them physiologically. She
suggested that the additional health hazards should be included in that section
which presently lists only permanent hearing loss and temporary hearing loss
as the result of excessive noise.
Mrs. Rudolph suggested that under a "public information" section tile report
might include a rating of various n~akes of home appliances with regard to the
generation of noise within the home.
She also felt that although there is no certainty that a major airport may be
placed near the Chula Vista area, the report should include the effects of noise
in Chula Vista if the airport is located nearby. She quoted from an article
published in "Science and Public Affairs," May, 1969, ~hich stated that one does
not have to be directly under the flight path of a jet plane in takeoff to
receive an earsplitting roar, since a 707 jet, four miles from the point of brake
release at the end of the runway, and has attained an altitude of 800 feet, the
noise level on the ground one-half mile on either side of the flight path is
approximately 85 decibels.
Mrs. Rudolph asked if additional effort could be made to route traffic, or at
least truck traffic, away from the places which the State designates should have
only a 45 decible sound level.
Commissioner Rice asked if there is any means by which the City can regulate
vehicular noise.
Director of Planning Peterson confirmed that the State has preempted tire field
of regulating vehicular traffic noise. He reported that no discussion of airport
noise was included in the report since C. P. O. has taken the position that Chula
Vista ~ill not suffer from noise problems even if the airport is located south
of here. He felt if location of the airport reaches a point of certainty, the
question of noise will come under very close scrutiny.
-8- 8/14/74
Commissioner Rudolph commented on the noise created by motorcycles and asked
about the City's power to enforce noise regulation enacted by State and Federal
laws.
Chairman Chandler interjected that the policy recommended for adoption by the
staff is broad enough to cover a number of the specific items raised by Commissioner
Rudolph.
MSC (l~ilson-Rice) The Noise Element as presented be approved and forwarded to the
City Council for adoption.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Wilson, Rice, Floto and Chandler
NOES: Commissioner Rudolph
ABSENT: Commissioner Starr
A recess was called at 8:30 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 8:45 p.m.
10. Consideration of PreCise Plan for Industrial Buildings, 388 Bay Boulevard,
Charles Offerman
Current Planning Supervisor Lee advised that the applicant is proposing to
construct four separate industrial warehouse buildings, totalling approximately
70,000 square feet, on the 3 acre site which is zoned I-P and included in Subarea
E of the Bayfront Plan. He noted that the proposed land use conforms to the
Bayfront Plan and the westerly buildings are located near the railway easement
in theevent a rail spur is desired to serve the location, f4r. Lee called
attention to the conditions recommended by the staff in recommending approval
of the proposed Precise Plan.
Although a public hearing is not required, the Chairman called upon the applicant
for comments concerning the proposed development.
Bob Hammond, 1240 Vernon ~ay, E1Cajon, working with Mr. Offerman, indicated
they take no exception to the five conditions enumerated in the report, but
questioned the statement in the analysis section of the report which indicated
the developer will be required to construct a sewer in Bay Boulevard. He
expressed the belief that the sewer is presently being installed by another
firm. He felt tire sewer in Bay Boulevard ~ould not benefit this property since
there is presently a sewer line in G Street which would serve this property.
-9- - 8/14/74
Assistant Director of Public Works Robens confirmed that the sewer in Bay Boulevard
is being paid for by Rohr Industries, but under an agreement that as other properties
connect to the sewer line they will reimburse Rohr for a proportionate share of the
cost.
Mr. Hammond expressed objection to the requirement to pay for sewer in Bay Boulevard
since he felt the sewer previously installed in G Street by this property owner
could adequately handle the needs of the property.
Mr. Robens indicated that if the sewer in Bay Boulevard is capable of serving
the entire property, then the developer is obligated to pay a portion of the cost
of that sewer. He indicated it ~ould take further investigation to determine
whether the sewer in G Street can service the entire property.
Commissioner Rudolph pointed out that this plan does not fully conform to the
criteria adopted for the Bayfront, since it provides for 16 parking spaces
in the front portion of the lot, between the building and Bay Boulevard. She
suggested that the two front buildings be moved nearer to the front to allow
the parking to be located at the rear of the building.
Current Planning Supervisor Lee pointed out that the proposed plan provides
landscape screenin§ in front of the parking and in front of the buildings which
substantially fulfills the requirements of the Bay Front plan.
MSC (Rice-Wilson) Recommend to the City Council the approval of the precise plan
for industrial development of property at 388 Bay Boulevard as submitted by
Charles Offerman, subject to the following conditions, and with the provision
that the Department of Public Works determine the need for providing sewer service
in Bay Boulevard.
1. Site plan shall be revised to show:
a. Separation of the northerly loading bay in Warehouse 1 from the
parking lot.
b. Ma~n driveway off Bay Blvd. moved south to line up with interior
driveway.
c. Parking spaces and landscaped areas rearranged.
d. Parking spaces blocked by loading docks marked as "Employee Parking".
2. Development of the property shall be subject to site plan and architec-
tural review.
-10- '- 8/14~74
3. Prior to issuance 0~ any permits the applicant shall provide documenta-
tion of legally established parcel boundaries or shall file a parcel map.
4. Development of the property shall conform to the development criteria
of the Bayfront Specific Plan. (City Council Resolution No. 7146, adopted
January 7, 1974) except as modified in these conditions of approval.
5. Installation of public improvements shall be subject to the approval
of the Director of Public Works.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Rice, Wilson, Floto and Chandler
NOES: Commissioner Rudolph
ABSENT: Commissioner Starr
Il. Consideration of request to modify sign criteria in Bayfront Specific
Plan, Bay Blvd. and E Street - Anthony's Fish Grotto
Director of Planning Peterson advised that Anthony's Fish Grotto has requested
permission to erect a 75 sq. ft. freestanding sign, 25 feet high, oriented
towards the freeway. The property is zoned C-V and is located within the
Bayfront Area. This type of sign is prohibited in the development criteria
for the Bayfront, however, the City Council previously approved a 20 ft. pole
sign with an area of 75 sq. ft. for Dixieline Lumber Company contingent upon
removal of the sign after 7 years. The thought was that while the area is in
transition from industrial use to visitor commercial use some sign arrangements
should be made, but after the character of the Bayfront is established under the
precise plan, this type of signing would no longer be required and could be
removed. Based on that precedent the staff recommends approval of this sign
request for a 7 year period, subject to three conditions as listed in the report.
Kenneth Mitchell, representing Federal Sign Company, spoke of the need for a
freeway sign at this time and confirmed the applicant's willingness to abide
by the 7 year program.
MSUC (Rudolph-Wilson) Recommend to the City Council approval of a modification
of the sign criteria for Subarea "D" of the Bayfront Specific Plan to permit a
75 sq. ft., 25 ft. high sign for Anthony's Fish Grotto, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Design and specifications of the sign shall conform to Exhibit A.
2. No other signs facing I-5 or E Street shall be allowed for this
establishment.
'- -11- "' 8/14/74
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the requested sign, the
applicant shall execute an agreement with the City and post a surety
bond in the amount of $500.00 agreeing to remove the freestanding sign
no later than December 31, 1981.
12. COnsideration Of an appeal to change colors of a wall sign, 1478 I~ielrose -
RonFlo~d
On the advice of the Assistant City Attorney, Commissioner Wilson abstained
from discussion or action on this item.
Assistant City Attorney Beam advised the applicant that under the terms of
the City Charter a majority vote of the entire Commission is required to
grant an appeal from a decision of the Zoning Administrator. With Commissioner
Wilson~s abstention, only four Commissioners are available to consider this
request. He felt the applicant should be given the choice of having it
considered at this time or continued to a subsequent meeting when the full
Commission would be present.
Gordon Boltz, 531 East J Street, one of the partners in the Century 21 office
requesting the color change asked that it be considered at this meeting.
Current Planning Supervisor Lee passed to the Commission photos taken of the
shopping center at Melrose and Orange which show that with the exception of the
two major tenants, all other tenants utilize an established theme of blue and
white signs of uniform size. The applicant has requested permission to change
the colors for their sign to brown and gold, the nationally adopted color scheme
for Century 21 realtors. The Zoning Administrator denied the request since it
would be a departure from the blue and white color scheme adopted by this center
in 1970.
Gordon Boltz, 531 East J Street, passed to the Commission displays of photographs
of Century 21 signs, submitted that Century 21 is a rapidly growing national
company. He felt the image portrayed by their sign is an important asset in
that growth, and that the brown and gold color scheme is as important to that
image as the logo and lettering style. He cited various national firms that
utilize certain colors in their advertising, tte felt the sign for their office
should be of the same colors as the for sale signs which they place on property
which they have listed.
Commissioner Chandler pointed out that the present tenant of the proposed office
location is a Century 21 realtor and uses a bSue and white sign.
-12- - 8/14/74
Commissioner Rice agreed that the color scheme used nationally by Century 21 is
an attractive sign, but pointed out the fact that a coordinated color scheme for
the center promotes a better overall development.
Commissioner Floto reported that after visiting the center he agrees that the
blue and white color scheme looks nice, but he did not feel the Commission
could impose this on a particular applicant that had attained a well known image
with an established color scheme.
Chairman Chandler pointed out that at this particular center there are already
two facilities utilizing different colors and for that reason he would favor
granting this request for deviation from the color theme.
MS (Floto-Chandler) The request for change of colors for the sign of Floyd-Boltz
Realtors at 1478 Melrose Avenue be approved.
The motion failed by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Floto, Chandler and Rudolph
NOES: Commissioner Rice
ABSTAINED: Commissioner ~ilson
ABSENT: Commissioner Starr
13. Consideration of request for amendment to the Precise Plan for the Chula
Vista MediCal Center, 480 Fourth Ave. - Pacific Sign
construCtion
Director of Planning Peterson advised that a request has been made for a 10 ft.
high sign, 72 sq. ft. in area for the main face of the sign with a smaller copy
area of approximately 6 sq. ft. added to identify the pharmacy in the building.
Under the provisions of the "P" Modifying District the Planning Commission has
the authority to approve this request. Mr. Peterson pointed out that both the
site and the building are large, so that a relatively large sign can be
justified. He pointed out that a small sign would tend to be blocked from the
view of southbound traffic by the zoning wall on the north. The staff recommends
approval of the dimensions and design as shown on Exhibit A enclosed with the
staff report.
MSUC (Wilson-Rudolph) The request for amendment to the Precise Plan to permit
a sign as proposed for the Chula Vista Medical Center be approved.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director of Planning Peterson asked if the Commission desired to have a dinner
-13- 8/14/74
meeting on August 21st with the workshop session beginning at 5:00 p.m. He
indicated there is no urgent item for discussion at the meeting and if the
Commission preferred the meeting could be cancelled.
It was moved by Commissioner Wilson, and concurred by the other Commissioners,
that the workshop meeting regularly scheduled for August 21, 1974 be cancelled.
COi~MISSION CO~IMENTS
Commissioner Rice reported that he would be on vaction the last two weeks in
August and asked to be excused from the meeting of August 28.
Commissioner Rudolph expressed interest in the articles on development rights
transfer, and felt the City should explore the possibility of a similar concept
for the Bayfront Area.
Mrs. Rudolph also expressed concern that the action taken by the City Council
to reduce speeds on Second Avenue would not solve the basic problem of excess
traffic on Second Avenue due to the rerouting of Highway 54 traffic.
Director of Planning Peterson advised that the Council did refer the problem to
the State Department of Transportation and a letter is being sent to that
department to see if they can offer a solution to the problem. If they have none
the problem will be discussed again by the City Council.
Commissioner Rice commented on the need for improvement in the landscaping
at the Melrose and Orange shopping center and on the perpetual problem of
paving of the parking lot at the Hilltop and Naples center.
ADJ OURNIIEI;T
Chairman Chandler adjourned the meeting at 10:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Helen Mapes
Secretary