HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1980/09/30 Item 5, a, b Reso. 10276
..
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 5, a, b.
Meeting Date 9/30/80
Public hearing - Consideration of reV1Slon to specific plan for South College,
Sectional Planning area and revised tentative subdivision map for Chu1a Vlsta
Tract 80-20, Charter Point .
Resolution /~~~- Approving revision to specific plan for South College Sectlona1
P1 anni n9 Area,
Resolution /~~~~ Approving.revised tentative sub- (4/~ths Vote: Yes
division map for Chu1a Vlsta Tract 80-20, Charter POlnt
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ~
A. BACKGROUND
ITEM TITLE:
No-X.J
1. On May 20, 1980 the City Council approved the tentative subdivision map for Charter
Point, Chu1a Vista Tract 80-20, and the Sectional Planning Area plan for the easterly 41
acres of the South College area of the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan, located at the
northwest quadrant of Otay Lakes Road and Telegraph Canyon Road in the P-C zone. The pro-
posed development consists of 260 condominium units on postage stamp lots.
2. At the time of review, it was discussed that 1.5 acres of available surplus college
property located at the southeast corner of the Southwestern Community College may be
acquired by the developer and incorporated into the project. The property has since been
acquired by the developer who is now requesting approval of a revision to the tentative map
and Sectional Planning Area plan to include the 1.5 acres in the proposed development. On
August 12, 1980 the property was rezoned from R-1 to P-C in anticipation of the revision and
to make the zoning of the properties consistent.
3. On August 7, 1980 the Environmental Review Committee found that the proposed
revision to the Charter Point subdivision and South College Sectional Planning Area plan
would not have a significant effect on the environment and recommended that the Environmental
Impact Report, EIR-80-4, be recertified.
B. RECOMMENDATION:
Concur with the Planning Commission recommendation except that the resolution should be
modified as discussed below to delete any reference to the provision of 3% of the units as
"inclusionary units" and to modify the language of the finding regarding conformance with
the Housing Element of the General Plan.
C. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
On September 10, 1980 the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that the City
Council: 1) Approve a revision to the South College Sectional P1annin~ Area plan to
include the 1.5 acre site in accordance with Resolution PCM-81-2; and 2) approve the revised
tentative subdivision map for Charter Point, Chu1a Vista Tract 80-20 in accordance with
Resolution PCS-80-20 (Revised).
D. DISCUSSION
1. Property acquisition.
As indicated earlier, the subject property (1.5 acres) was recently acquired by the
developer and has been incorporated into his ownership through the adjustment plan procedure.
It is, therefore, appropri~te for the property to be incorporated into the original plan of
development.
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)
)6 2- 76
I _
..
Page 2, Item' 5, a, b
Meeting date 9/30/80
2. Proposed development.
The applicant proposes to construct an additional 14 units on the property, bringing
the total number to 274 units. The units, which are identical in architecture and design
as originally proposed, will be contained in four structures as follows: 2 uphill four-
plexes, 1 downhill fourplex, and 1 downhill duplex. (The buildings are front to back split
level structures.) Each unit will have a two car garage and 16 open guest parking spaces
will be provided. Access is provided by a 26 foot wide private road extending from the
public street (Apache Drive) serving the Charter Point development. The proposed revision
was anticipated in the original design of the subdivision and therefore does not alter
that design except for the actual encroachment of the access road serving the additional
14 units. Therefore, the revision represents a logical extension of the original map,
together with the findings and conditions of approval.
3. The original resolution approving this tract carried with it the condition
requiring the applicant to devote 10% of his units to low or moderate income units. When
this 1.5 acre expansion was before the Planning Commission on September 10, staff recom-
mended and the Planning Commission approved a modification to the condition reducing the
percentage of "inclusionary units" to 3% as was recommended at the Council Conference on
August 14. However, Council's action of September 23 to delete the requirement for any
inclusionary units on the properties at Telegraph Canyon Road and Nacion and at Bonita
Road west of 1-805 clarifies Council's policy in this area. Accordingly, the language
in the Planning Commission's resolution after "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, II and before
condition No.1 should be deleted. Further, the language on page 2 of the Planning
Conlnission's resolution under "Housing Element" should be modified to read as follows:
"The development of condominiums on the subject property at a density of 10 dwelling
units per acre will provide 274 additional housing units which should be available
at prices below those of detached single family homes. II
KGL:hm
i
"" f
,,_.--' "---'~'".~'~
--,~_.".....--_.__.--
Ly I ,,'
r '!.,
. (:f
ChU1J \/ls
- ,- ~ ' , ,:)
,i \j~ (i,U
Dated
'{_ ~~; Fd
~71i
~
.~.- .
Office of
JENNIE M. FULASZ, CITY CLERK
City O~ ChuQa CVigta
CALIFORNIA
Date:
To:
Subject:
( ) R~solution No.
( ) Ordinance No.
You will find enclosed a certifi&d ~QPY or the City Council
document approved at the meeting Qf
"l0-ue/ ~
JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC
City Clerk
Enclosures
STAR NEWS: PieMe pubwh :t1U-6 doc.wnent on
and -6end M a c.opy 60Jt oUJt OJr..dA..nanc.e Book..
RECORVER: PieMe Jtec.oM -6a,.td doc.wnen:t and Jte:tUJtl1 -U. :to M a:t yoUJt
ea.Jtlie-6:t c.onvenienc.e.
At60 enc.lo-6ed..u, the ORIGINAL C.opy 06 the agJteemen:t. PieMe have .u:.
exec.u:ted and Jte:tUM :to :th..u, 06 6ic.e.
(~77GP
276 Fourth Avenue, Chu1a Vista, CA 92010 (714)575-5041
CC-685(Rev.10i79)