Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm min 1972/04/03 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA April 3, 1972 The regular meeting of the City Planning Commission of Chula Vista, California was held on the above date beginning at 7:00 p.m. with the following members present: Stewart, Rice, Adams, Macevicz, Chandler, Rudolph, Whitten, and ex-officio member Miller. Also present: Senior Planner Williams, Associate Planner Lee, City Attorney Lindberg and Assistant Director of Public Works Robens. Movie on "STREET GRAPHICS" A film was shown depicting the clutter and unpleasing appearance which may result from a proliferation of signs along city streets and the ~neffectiveness of signs which attempt to convey too much message. The film also contained examples of signs which complemented the surrounding area. PUBLIC HEARING (Cont.): Consideration of amendments to ZoninG Ordinance relatin~ to si~n provisions in R-3 and C-O zones Associate Planner Lee commented on concern expressed at the public hearing that wall signs in the R-3 zone should be permitted to contain information other than the name and address. The staff concurs there is some validity in identifying the location of the manager's office in large apartment complexes and suggest permit- ting this to be incorporated in a freestanding sign or placed on the building. The staff does not think signs should include the number of bedrooms or whether the units are furnished or unfurnished. The staff proposed an amendment to include l½ sq. ft. riders on "For Sale" or "For Rent" signs indicating the realtor and a phone number. Chairman Stewart declared the public hearing reopened for additional comments from the audience, but as no one wished to speak the public hearing was closed. MSUC (Macevicz-Rudolph) Recommend to the City Council the adoption of amendments RESOLUTION PCZ-72-1 to Sections 33.505 E and 33.506 E relating to signs in the R-3 and C-O zones. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MSUC (Chandler-Adams) The minutes of the meeting of March 20, 1972, be approved as mailed. PUBLIC HEARING (Cont.): a. REZONING - 200 block of Palomar Street, R-3 to C-C-P - Bart Corp. b. Request for approval of Precise Plans Third & Palomar, C-C-P zone - Bart Corp. Associate Planner Lee pointed out the location of the property in question and noted that it had been prezoned R-3 prior to annexation at the same time the adjacent property to the north was prezoned C-C-P. The property was at that time under different ownership but has been acquired by Bart Corporation who propose to incorporate it into their commercial development. -2- 4/3/72 Mr. Lee discussed the precise plan which was submitted, noting that most of the guidelines stipulated in the zoning have been adhered to. He pointed out that the staff had required that they delete a proposed service station at the north- west corner of the property and replace it with a financial facility. The plan does provide limited access only from Kennedy Street, a zoning wall on the east property line adjacent to R-3 zoned property, and building orientation toward Third Avenue and Palomar Street. Chairman Stewart declared the public hearing opened. A representative of the applicant was present and advised he had no further comments to add to the staff presentation of the plan, further that he concurred with the recommendations of the staff. Kathryn Moore, 1134 Tobias Drive, speaking for South Bay Citizens Planning Committee, questioned whether the volume and speed of traffic on Third Avenue would permit making left hand turns to enter this property. Chairman Stewart pointed out the problem of traffic control should be resolved by the Traffic Engineer and Department of Public Works. MSUC (Adams-Chandler) Recommend to the City Council approval of change of zone RESOLUTION PCZ-72-E from R-3 to C-C-P for property in the 200 block on the north side of Palomar Street. MSUC (Rice-Macevicz) Approval of the Precise Plan for development by Bart Corporation of the property at Third and Palomar subject to the following conditions: 1. The submission and approval of a parcel map to consolidate all lots into one site. The grading plan and location of all easements shall be shown on the parcel map and shall be subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering staffs. 2. A copy of the deed restrictions shall be filed with the Planning Department. 3. Several minor problems of traffic circulation will have to be worked out with the applicant prior to submission of the precise plan and rezoning request to the City Council. PUBLIC HEARING: a. REZONING - Northwest quadrant 1-805 and Bonita Road, C-C-D-F and R-I-15-F to C-V - Bond, Ltd. b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - Bonita Road - Service station in C-V zone and construction in Flood Plain District - Bond, Ltd. c. VARIANCE - Bonita Road - Request for reduction in side yard from 25' to 10' - Bond, Ltd. Associate Planner Lee indicated the location of the property owned by the applicant and a portion of the adjacent property owned by a church which they propose to purchase and include in this development. He pointed out that the property adjacent on the east, zoned C-C-D, was approved for a service station; however, the conditional use permit has expired this year. -3- 4/3/72 Mr. Lee advised that the staff is basically opposed to rezoning at this time as development for freeway oriented commercial enterprise is premature. It is also felt that a development plan should consider all of the property on the north side of Bonita Road between the church and the freeway offramp. Mr. Lee also reported that the conditional use permit is required for any construc- tion in the Flood Plain Modifying District and also for the service station which is proposed as part of this development. He pointed out that this site does not meet the requirement specified in the Zoning Ordinance for a service station which states that stations should be located at the intersection of two major streets. The staff has seen no justification for a service station at this site, nor for the requested variance for reduction of the side yard to 10'. This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. Cliff Burford, Planning Consultant, representing the applicant, discussed their development plans for the property which would include an 80 unit motel, Love's pit barbecue restaurant and a service station. He indicated that if the service station were denied they would not develop the property at this time. He displayed a rendering of the proposed structures pointing out they have coordinated rock face, landscaping and roof styles on all buildings. He indicated the drainage ditch which runs through the property would be placed underground. He asserted their justification for a service station is that this is a freeway oriented facility. He quoted State predictions on the number of cars expected on the freeway by 1975 and also the number that will utilize Bonita Road. He contended this total development will complement the commercial and high density residential development across the street. Lyn Myers, 3772 Riviera Drive, San Diego, representing Motor Lodge, Inc., discussed their need for a service station and restaurant on the site with their motel. They refer to this as total service accommodation, and have found this type of develop- ment more successful. Irv Malashock, 1880 Harbor Island Drive, San Diego, co-owner of Love's Woodpit Barbecue, expressed his interest in finding a location in the South Bay area. He reported their restaurants are more successful when they are part of a development or complex so they can get tourist trade as well as serve local residents. In response to a question by Member Adams, Mr. Burford advised they intend to construct this development in two stages; the service station and restaurant would be built first; with the entire development to be completed within 18 months. W. A. Crow, 364 Alpine, Pastor of Calvary Baptist Church, reported that the people in the church were unanimously in favor of the proposed development. He pointed out they have more property than required for their needs and are desirous of selling a portion of their land for this proposed development. As no one else wished to speak the public hearing was closed. Member Rice questioned the need for another service station site in this area, pointing out there are two service stations directly across the street which could adequately serve the tourists of this motel or patrons of the restaurant. -4- 4/ 3/72 The Commission discussed the uncertainty of Humble Oil Company's plans for development of the property adjacent to the freeway offramp and the desirability of coordinating development plans for all property on the north side of Bonita Road between the church and the freeway. Associate Planner Lee recommended that the Commission continue the matter until April 17th and initiate consideration of rezoning from C-C-D to C-V-P for the adjacent parcel which would insure coordination of the development of that property. Chairman Stewart asked for a motion to continue the public hearings under discussion for two weeks in order to include rezoning of the adjacent parcel at the same time. MSUC (Rice-Chandler) The public hearing for consideration of rezoning, conditional, use permit and variance application by Bond, Ltd., be continued to the meeting of April 17. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - Request for relocation of Rohr Heliport - Rohr Industries, Inc. Associate Planner Lee displayed a plat of the area indicating the location of the heliport at the boat yard north of %" Street and the proposed location within the boundaries of the Rohr plant, east of Tidelands Avenue and the proposed marina. The staff has presented findings for approval of the conditional use permit and for location of the use on Tidelands; this would be subject to a limited number of daily trips and to compliance with any conditions required by the San Diego Unified Port District. This being the time and place as advertised the public hearing was opened. Tom Montgomery, Corporate Facilities Planner, Rohr Industries, confirmed that 60 landings a month would be the very maximum; also that this facility will consist only of a landing pad, there will be no accessory building. In response to a question from Member Whitten as to the reason for relocating the heliport, Mr. Montgomery commented the original location was for a test only, the relocation will be more accessible to the existing plant buildings. As no one else wished to speak, the public hearing was closed. Members Rice and Chandler abstained from discussion or voting on this application. MSUC (Adams-Macevicz) Approval of conditional use permit for accessory use on RESOLUTION PCC-72-11 Tidelands to allow relocation of Rohr Heliport, subject to the following conditions: 1. Any significant increase in the number of daily trips that would have a detrimental effect on the surrounding area and/or uses shall require a recon- sideration of the granting of this conditional use permit (subject to Planning Commission review). 2. Any conditions imposed or required by the San Diego Unified Port District shall be complied with. -5- 4/3/72 Findings are as follows: a. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary or desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well- being of the neighborhood or the community. The relocation of the heliport will make it more convenient for access and use by the applicant as well as being available to the community for emergency use. b. That such use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. The heliport will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare, provided that all local, State and Federal regulations are complied with. c. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified in the Code for such use. The heliport will comply with all local, State and Federal regulations. d. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Chula Vista or the adopted plan of any govern- mental agency. The relocation of the heliport will not adversely affect the General Plan. Findings for Accessory Use on Tidelands: a. The heliport will be consistent with the character and development of the City in this area. b. The heliport will not violate the trust purposes of the tidelands grant. c. The operation of the heliport will not result in an unreasonable deprivation of the public's enjoyment of water-oriented activities provided all applicable regulations are complied with. d. The heliport will not be a nuisance or have adverse effects provided the number of daily trips is limited and all applicable regulations are satisfied. Director's Report Senior Planner Williams reported that contracts have been let and work will begin in the immediate future on the parking lot for the shopping center at Hilltop and Naples. This will include patching holes in the pavement, resurfacing, sealing and restriping the lot. Commission Comments Member Adams circulated a picture of a rooftop sign used by Central Federal Savings and Loan. The Commission expressed disfavor with this type of sign but acknowledged the architecture of some buildings will not accommodate a wall sign. - 6- 4/3/72 Oral Communications Mr. Martin of Martin Neon Company questioned the disposition of an application for a conditional use permit for a freestanding sign at 354 Third Avenue. Associate Planner Lee advised Mr. Martin that the application had been withdrawn by written request. Chairman Stewart advised him to discuss this with the staff in the Planning Department since the application did not appear on the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting. ADJOURNMENT MSUC (Macevicz-Whitten) The meeting adjourn at 8:55 p.m. to the meeting of April 17, 1972. Respectfully submitted, Helen Mapes Secretary