HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990/12/10 Board of Appeals & Advisors Minutes
.
.
.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADVISORS
CI1Y OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
December 10.1990
Public Services Building. Conference Room No.1
5:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Contreras, Vice-Chairman Leonard, Board
Members Arnold, McArthur and Nash
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Board Members Gingerich and Reynolds
CI1Y STAFF PRESENT:
Director of Building and Housing Larsen, Assistant Director of
Building and Housing Remp, Administrative Secretary
Uybungco, Senior Code Enforcement Officer Foster, Senior
Building Inspector Monaghan and Assistant Director of
Community Development Gustafson (Guest)
CALL MEETING TO ORDER: Chairman Contreras called the meeting to order at 5:07 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Members present constituted a quorum.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MSUC ArnoldfNash (5-0) to approve the minutes of
November 12, 1990.
2. NEW BUSINESS:
1.
A. Notice and Order to Demolish Commercial Building @ 2578 Main Street,
Chula Vista, CA 92011.
This hearing is tape recorded on a separate tape and is available for Mr.
Jabro, the appellant, if he wishes to obtain a copy.
Senior Code Enforcement Officer Foster and Senior Building Inspector
Monaghan presented the following information:
1) The building burned on May 14, 1990. The department posted a
"Dangerous Building" notice and informed the owner to obtain a
Demolition Permit on May 15, 1990.
2) Chula Vista Municipal Code requirements state that if more than 60
percent of the building is destroyed, all uses must be corrected to
conform with the zone.
3) Presented information regarding evidence of the damage to the
building. The Board's decision was to determine if at least 60 percent
of the structure has been destroyed.
4)
Showed video tape of the damages of the buildings.
Board of Appeals & Advisors
-2-
December 10, 1990
.
Mr. Rommel Jabro, the appellant, presented the following information:
1) Presented proposed reconstruction plan to the Board. Proposed to
reconstruct a 3000 sq. ft. structure and the remainder of the lot would
be used for parking and landscaping. Will also perform off-site
improvement work as required by the City. Appellant proposed to
leave existing auto repair activity on site.
2) The use for the proposed 3000 sq. ft. structure would be a
grocery/liquor store.
3) Wishes to save a portion of the existing building. Stated that he does
not have enough money to demolish everything and start all over.
In response to the Board's inquiries, Senior Code Enforcement Officer Foster
stated that no matter what Mr. Jabro plans to do with his property, he must
apply for a building permit and which must be approved by various City
departments (Building and Housing, Planning, Engineering and Community
Development - Redevelopment Area). The existing auto repair building
located behind the burned out structure must then be in compliance with the
zone.
.
MSUC Arnold/Leonard (5-0) to approve staffs recommendation that the
buildings shall be totally razed, inclusive of foundations.
Board Member Nash requested soils tests to be performed on site to
determine the level of soil is contamination. Senior Code Enforcement
Officer Foster responded that soils tests will be required in conjunction with
the Notice and Order to Abate the Nuisance.
Director Larsen informed Mr. Jabro that staff would respond to him in
writing as to the findings and decisions of the Board and will notify him of the
time frame for which the corrections must be made.
3. DIREcrOR'S COMMENTS/REPORT:
A. Presentation by the Assistant Director of Community Development, David
Gustafson.
There are currently four redevelopment areas within the City.
ij
Bayfront - Visitor Serving Commercial Activities
Town Center I
Town Center II - Regional Shopping Center
Southwest Redevelopment Project Area
.
Under California Redevelopment Act, #2 and #3 above are one project
because the City merged the funds.
In order for the City to consider a portion of the City for redevelopment,
blighting conditions must exist.
.
.
.
Board of Appeals & Advisors
December 10, 1990
-3-
Property taxes are derived from these areas which the City (Redevelopment
Agency) can use to improve the areas. The City is entitled to take tax
increments - ascertain tax flow from property tax, freeze the tax at that level
(base year) and any tax beyond the base year goes to the Redevelopment
Agency to spend on improvements.
Project Area Committees are established for each redevelopment project.
These committees are comprised of residents and/or members of the business
community. These individuals advise the Redevelopment Agency what their
concerns are within their areas.
The Board thanked Mr. Gustafson for his presentation.
B. Presentation of Exit Criteria, Chapter 33, Uniform Building Code.
This presentation has been postponed to the January meeting.
4. COMMUNICATIONS (PUBLIC REMARKS/WRITIEN CORRESPONDENCE): None.
5. Chairman Contreras adjourned the meeting at 6:12 p.m. to the next regular meeting
scheduled for January 14, 1990.
~J
, G()
Yee1in Uyb ' g~
AdministratIve Secretary
Department of Building and Housing
/yu
(e:\boardmin.doc)