HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010/06/22 Item 13
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
-,;
~\r~ CITY OF
~ CHULA VISTA
6/22/tO, Item~
ITEM TITLE:
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ,OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE PEDEST
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
ASSISTANT "mt~j OF ENG
CITY MANAGER
ASSIST ANT CITY ANAGER ""? r
4/5THS VOTE: YES 0 NO [8J
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
SUMMARY
On July 22, 2008 Council approved an agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Alta
Planning + Design (Alta) for the development of the City's first Pedestrian Master Plan, The
goal of the Plan was to identify and prioritize pedestrian improvement projects based on
technical analysis and community input, thereby promoting orderly implementation on a
citywide basis and enhancing the City's ability to secure timding, The draft Final Report has
been prepared and presented to the Safety Commission for comment
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has detenilined that the project falls
under the statutory exemption for Feasibility and Planning Studies pursuant to Section 15262 of
the State CEQA Guidelines, Thus, no further environmental review is necessary at this time,
Consideration of environmental factors will be done once a specific project is defined and
funded,
RECOMMENDATION
Council adopt the resolution,
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Pedestrian Master Plan was presented and discussed at the Safety Commission meeting held
on June 2, 2010, At that meeting, the Conmlission unanimously adopted a resolution
recommending that the City Council adopt the Pedestrian Master Plan (Attachment I),
DISCUSSION
In order to use the region's transportation funding most effectively, the San Diego Association of
Governments (SANDAG) recommends, and in the future will require, that each local agency in
13-1
6/22/10, ltemK
Page 2 of 4
the region have a Pedestrian Master Plan in order to compete and receive funding for pedestrian
projects. A Pedestrian Master Plan will also strengthen the City's project justification in
applying for State and Federal funding (such as Safe Routes to Schools) for p~destrian
improvements. SANDAG awarded the City a $150,000 grant for the development of a Citywide
Pcdestrian Master Plan.
Staff issued a Request for Proposals and convened a panel that interviewed the live firms that
submitted proposals. On July 22, 2008 Council approved an agreement between the City and
Alta Planning + Design, the top ranking fiml, for the development of a Pedestrian Master Plan
(PMP) for a total cost of$152,002.
AHa coordinated this project with the City's "Kids Walk and Bike to School" project, which was
being conducted at the same time as the PMP. This project was funded through a Safe Routes to
School grant and involved community walking audits of 36 of the City's public elementary
schools. These audits offered community members the opportunity to present their suggestions
for infrastructure and enforcement improvements generally within a ",-mile radius of each
school. At the PMP kickoff meeting on August 21, 2008, it was decided to extend the time
period for preparation of the PMP in order to obtain complete results of the walking audits.
The main components of the PMP are as follows:
1. Public Input /Communitv Involvement: Alta participated in several events related to
the PMP throughout this project. AHa staff participated in a community fair at
Lauderbach Park at the begiuning of this process. They also participated in several
elementary school walking audits and spoke before the Southwest Civic Association and
Northwest Civic Association. After the preliminary recommendations were prepared,
four Open House workshops were held in southeast, southwest, northeast and northwest
Chula Vista. AHa prepared a questionnaire which was distributed both at the various
commumty meetings and online.
An important component of this project was the Stakeholders' Group. The group met
five times during the course of this project and provided valuable input that was
incorporat~d into the PMP. Stakeholders' Group members included City staff from
Engineering, Development Services and the Police Department, as well as representatives
from the Planning Commission, Walk San Diego, the Chula Vista Elementary School
District. the Chamber of Commerce, the Northwest Civic Association and the senior
community. Representatives from the Southwest community were also invited, but did
not attend.
2. Surveving and Identifving Existing Conditions: This included identifying and
analyzing existing infrastructure deficiencies and tranic information from City databases
such as missing pedestrian ramps and sidewalks, accident data, traffic volumes and speed
limits. This also included compiling census data, such as the population percentages of
youth and seniors and the percentage of walking commuters. Additionally, planning
information from SANDAG was considered, such as locations of pedestrian destinations,
physical barriers, and transit facilities and ridership.
13-2
6/22/10, item ;5'
Page 3 of 4
3. Analysis of School Area Assessments: Alta participated in several of the elementary
school walking audits, analyzed the written reports and prepared maps summarizing the
findings of the reports. The recommendations were then discussed with the
Stakeholdcrs' Group. The City has obtained Safe Routes to School grants based on the
earlier walking audits, and they may be used to substantiate grant applications in the
future. The consultant has also prepared a Safe Routes to School Handbook discussing
recommended programs, improvements and policies that the City could implement in the
vicinity of schools.
4. Determining Priority Locations: Based on the analysis of existing conditions and
public input, areas of greatest need were identified. This resulted in the identitlcation of
priority roadway segments and intersections. The 30 high priority projects are shown on
Attachment 2. The weighting factors used for various criteria were developed with the
participation of the Stakeholders' Group.
5. Preparing Proiect Sheets and Cost Estimates: For the 30 high priority projects, the
Consultant prepared plats showing the extent of recommended improvements and
prepared preliminary cost estimates. A summary of the improvements included in these
projects and overall costs is provided in Attachment 3.
6. Financial Analysis: The Consultant reviewed and discussed the available financing
methods and determined which methods would be applicable to each of the high priority
projects. The Consultant then prepared a five-year program (Attachment 4), which listed
specific projects and phasing, and a more general 20-year program.
7. Recommending Guidelines and Standards: The Consultant reviewed the City's
General Plan, design standards and policies, along with State and Federal regulations,
including the Americans with Disabilities Act. Based on this review, the Consultant
prepared recommended Design Guidelines and changes to the City's Zoning Ordinance
in order to promote pedestrian accessibility and safety.
Based on the recommendations of the Pedestrian Master Plan, staff is proposing to apply tor the
State of California Cycle 9 Safe Routes to School Funding for three projects that are included in
the 30 priority areas. Each local agency is limited to a maximum submittal of three applications.
This staff proposal will be recommended to Council by a separate action. These projects
include:
. Moss Street Sidewalk Improvements from Third Ave. to Fifth Ave. (Priority #21)
. Montgomery Elementary School Neighborhood Traffic Calming (Priority #5)
. Quintard Street Improvements from First Ave. to Third Ave. (Priority #6)
Since the Pedestrian Master Plan is a large document (approximately 400 pages long), staff has
placed this document on the City's fip site. The PMP can be accessed as follows:
. Address: fip://np.chLdavistaca.gov
. User Name: SafetyComm
. Password: PsM*#-3 (case sensitive)
13-3
6/22/10, Item 13
Page 4 of 4
In case there are any problems accessing this site, a list of directions for common connection
problems is provided (Attachment 5).
A hard copy of this report will also be available for perusal at the City Clerk's office.
DECISiON MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site
specific and consequently the SUO foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section
18704.2(a)(I) is not applicable to this decision.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
There will be no immediate fiscal impact.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
In futllfe years, there may be an indirect fiscal impact, as certain projects and/or actions
recommended hy the Pedestrian Master Plan are constructed and/or implemented. Any future
projects that would have any fiscal impact would be approved by separate Council actions.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution of the Safety Commission Recommending Adoption of the Pedestrian
Master Plan
2. Chula Vista High Priority Project Location Map
3. Cost Estimates for High Priority Intersection and Corridor Projects
4. Proposed Five-Year Program
5. FAQ: Help with Ito.chulavistaca.gov Connections
Prepared b.'F Elizabeth Chopp, Scnior Civil Engineer, Engineering Puhlic Works Dept.
J IEngineerl4GENDA ICAS20 1 0106-22-1 Ol?edestrian Master P/anREVl.doc
13-4
ATTACHMENT i
RESOLUTION NO. SC-20l0-
RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE
PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN BY CITY COUNCIL
'WHEREAS, on July 22,2008 the Chula Vista City Council approved an agreement between
the City and Aha Planning + Design for development of the City's first Pedestrian Master Plan. The
goal of the Plan was to identify and prioritize pedestrian improvement projects based on technical
analysis and community input, thereby promoting orderly implementation on a citywide basis and
enhancing the City's ability to secure funding; and
WHEREAS, Aha has obtained input from community groups and local residents in the
preparation of this plan. The recommendations were formed in collaboration with a Stakeholders'
Group and the findings were presented in four Citywide forums; and
WHEREAS, the plan has been completed and is being presented to the Safety Commission
for discussion prior to presentation and adoption by the Chula Vista City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Safety Commission ofthe City ofChula
Vista does hereby accept the staff report and recommends adoption of the Pedestrian Master Plan by
City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the Safety Commission of the City of Chula
Vista, California, this ~ day of ,2010, by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
NAYS:
Commissioners:
ABSENT:
Commissioners:
John Liken, Chair
ATTEST:
Florence Picardal, Secretary
13-5
1
, " 1'" ,,"'" ' ' u,,,,".,
..JILl L ".!, y, I" '" ~',' " " ~~, .,' ",uuelde1,.""no '
"+- ~ ' I' " ' " _ ,.' , 5 ,(600l'
~,n " ,,,,,, ,<",",~, ""'""'~,
" "" "-~",,, .,""~ . . "''"~
l ~ -, ,) 1/ \ I r' " " ~" ' ~' ' ~ "
'---Z. Ji P,-" ",', I, (L1y;-1';SS"\,j ~i>wU'MRp/ ,"'l ){,"'\
. _ "F I ,~(- - y;,,(,' 1,:",'(=\J I j;'
0''i-'~--::;:u/'1-:yr;''''/::'l'''; l,~(:;v;$'>'" (/ /f--:'\ \,
.J'~ ---il,~~,' J;,' i,~j"r'''' ,,\1 ,(
",~,J'" (A./':,'1 ~ ' ' ~'- I J
yv\,~,J Y:-:'" !d(~1 \ -- ',-', ~) \, (,
r-r--"'s\ #"-::\=:i:---~~,;j-~'x"'\)'-/~~ V "-,
LJP<-I A:7.-c-/'c.-,-'yJ!.O\bi2 "'-c;:;:;\(~ \"\
_~ 1/ ";:fur""'; "y\V'0:"~ ' I"
--.-.-,-., ?=>~~-Ilhh~r-r-f,,-;?i;i~~ .<\?o-'2l,,-',;' <~;~ ;;:~z,~" ,\ \,
1 ~ ml ~-;n ::J i.{ ~y~ (-\ "r\\\",r-:;; \':';.." ol \ '
.J r '! -" X- r'''--- I .....7.---" iL,., \'0.';-' \Y"\. ';/y \'
,IJJ/' ", ,-:1 I .?"' - '-' r->+'\ " ,,'v. k';.,>
, c''';:5-L~0>'l- -t"'-{;, '0' (3 \1:-;'~;- ~.D1i' ~;:::?- ? v'
, ' \ ::cfii\:::J:O (\'6.,}'" I ,,< ,f; "=!!-~~"'\ ,,;> \ ,I
1_-., _ ~r~ (} ,_/)-~~\' 1fe~s1-af$~4s0)i\ff~!"-" ','
i?'.:::>' \;<. 121 'f' ----------... ~,"_.-m~ ' \ \ I
, '"<', ~~E:J ~__--' ' I " "I""~' /- I \ '
, 'YL5P~H'I~ ~G"""A''"''''-;;''''~''''-'-~ ,~," ' '"
" \ --," ; ~ "--,,~,.<,,,,>'
_I/..;Ff!;,' 'r"! _'1?,~0;~: ',<"'0 CCT" "' '''0' ~,__="""'";;., ,I' \
1,"'-.-" "" ,t,l~n'=":::::;"- ~-jl \ ,.,\" h1'flGfq:::;:::; --,.~,-..,--' . "
'" 'I, (V;,""0' 'J~~ P'i ~'~~ ,,, "",,'70 ,., """"" \ ' .
z"""' ,'"";/:,,,-"f~"':~ !_-'s!~fi;~U\ \\n~~\\' % '~;#~'30W-J~~~~~::~<'~:l ) "I \'
/$" /: 1 ,';0" \vr:- I\\)"" 0.\<.x::::,~'-::-r"'--" l
.,; ,,~, /"cc" '- 7""(~ ' \\\ ~\.,\<y\C,:.?----=.!Ir--.--1..r:r \ \
I i~H~!' (:F:"'J..,r:,,;;(;i.!7, \0i,."f,.l[,,:,!~/ ) '\ I
id! !fJ,0:':;o-/" \, ,;,'J~v 1\\ \\\JC),^:;:;~~"~\j-'_Jfi.L.J,iT'
1: ~ ~ ~ ' fl" \ / , \\'\\\~ 1:"'\' \f,cbS';-:;;""\ \ I
/j - B:;" f" f Y ~/"'J' -I' ::,;p~,,- '"~ ~(';~' ' ' \
,~ II" ,,:, ,0(. ,"\'<'':1(1'''-\.-t:- ~- i 'Ie)
;J ~ -:;'-'.\ /-<:! I' ,0-' II'",' \ r:: '~' ~.-',
C ,'''f' " ,. ",' ,11'>' C - . . ,
, \ H:t i-C--:-j)" '~\,;)"f:O;:'\'1s~~~~\;;;)b\~;S(,\- '- [ \
,,7 7";Y ~'IY;\ l:' ",:10-'0, Yc---"i''f- " ";'::.:} )(~""",,~ \, \ ' r,'
'_," 'd (\ v" 1 ,><\\ (t" '~"/c')\\'\' ' ".~/
--(~J~:r- ~\~~rr~~.'re'11t!~~tl:;i,\,) \ {~(f" "
a/ /'l7!ir' v,F' \0\0 .s-,-Fz::\ ';:", I'\\(~\~ \>= '. [i ~ LJ I,
! I (,-1--' I,. "/';,'\- ~:- ,\c\\\' \~ " I
r,.r; II '1<:.!1.Of. ,'~ ;:- \ \, ~ \ y J:;i'~o/(r;;'t I i L.
,",,,,jl \2:'"'1 \1 l' ",,> ~~; " """ '
, e \ t(r, ~0' ::" ',' rF. ''ii- l'Iil'll 'IT ,;
/"'f'; ) ;\\~ ~ 'TI4(i!~\ (',<~J;~: \ ~ft-f I ,ft 'I
~ _ ,~L ,-(f.-<:J! l C-~~ !i,)~*I\\'\d0"~~:;:::\\l,1<;~?pc~,44 1
\ '-.) \ __( Jc:?,j'-L ~v \\\,-;?,,"~c"I';u;.~
'\-" ~ ' I \ \ v<U 9 \ oI.."\:r",~~\-F.:-j~,~g .
, ,A ~ \:::C",) D:0:JJ1 )~,,;-fA\\~9~~<;"?~:'';:'<'~' -'!
11 ,_ --;'''~ \.,~\\\;,.""O"",,,~'~ - , ' ="",,-
I f,,~/!}j f\u' .if,c;"t{~"'G~:i~~\''c -~-l'--'-'--Kf ,r-\,~I -FI1 -""~_1I!;l.
\D) :r/j' J&9"ic:!\/\I\ ;j'e;\ \ C> ";,,J-r"'1 ( f~~-"""-'- -
""\"1 "t-::l\"Ji?ut,,,,~~\I, \' ~~u~ -"'I-~>
,..-:"l" Sc\~',\\f~~',-t-t\\\\\ E~' \~;:::iVJ 0.-.-L,_ '
/ ~~,.--;,(\ry; ,::0::.~1 \"Pee'\'\ ' ~~ I I '
___ .,.~G'-- '0~'rfI~.r",:;:S;),'V\f,* I' , ,-
,I~~ _ '':::=:::\ I,\\\\'~r,,,~i\ ;::'\.\;c:\"~( 'dcllJ . I
,.I'~,,-- " ~f~~~\_4\':'i~I~' SY::'~~f~I' :-1.
. ' "F' I:--'C\.~~~y.~,\-~'~'\ =\.-\~\" = ,- ",
'c~/r,-J ,--;-{'it' I \ ""''lA, , -cv _c '3
_1"':'S8\\\\S::-&'~:'\~;0'\' \ "; I", O~: ~I
~'~:,0t",,-:)\)r'\c\)>e'(e);\ iC'l ~ -' ~
~\ '':'Y''''~' I' /,' "'),_,- ';\ -:;, II.' ~ I "
",,~'5'~'\' ". \ ,0 "", '" , '
, ~;::;i'\(\'\\,C(';-~"\ _\:::; II , -\\~\ 5,\.~gi'':" 'i ~'
. ,. ",H" ., \ e', p.' .."," . " ., "..,
\ '\ 'c~' ~~_ 1'\\ II .>--,-\::X~ ,,' ,(, U' ",,"' 'd"'.i I<"t!
, " \~" ~, ,/~".... '''''~'t':::..':'' yl ro1i~
I'" " d-' r;;r- Iii:'" ~ Iii< \:.,.' ~,~ " ", "',1 ;p.~'" i
\\" <";.:, ';1 H,~ \ fa, .'ry,;"! ;7 .',
'.~\( ~~~~~~,.,~.,d:-ep~"~~~''''r~~~,'I\~~~~;;Jo~;d~ff "
"\ \0"'&'0 \ ,~___ ~"_""' "-~' ..='''''''. f ") .e, .
\ \' ,~ ' ~ ~. .,1> .
.' <h" 'if' ""\-~ I ir
. ' ,,,"" I ^J
. ,.,;",;;;i:Ji,.""'~-\'/ \_ ,.--:;;!-.c ~,"{,' -'
, . .9""""1" r" ";.-\,,,----.. .'''' YiC/li' ;, .
<"c~k~-l$,r!J~I~~~
~
Ji
~
o
o
-"
0.
"
" "
~!I!lle~ ~
~i'el1~~i
ID
'"
"
0.
ATTACHMENT
2-
\
\
,
.~
,,"
'.'
.'
'~
, ':;lJ,
""\
~
(G.
'\
'1
\,
c. ~
ATTACHMENT 3
[FUNDING]
Palomar Street (Orange Ave. to Second Sidewalk widening, curb extensions, $342,260
Ave.) missing sidewaiks, and curb ramps
2.1 Third Avenue (Moss Street to Orange Sidewalk widening, curb extensions, $567,485
Avenue) crosswalks, and curb ramps
Third Avenue (Orange Avenue to Main Sidewalk widening, curb extensions, $553,691
2.2 Street) crosswaiks, curb ramps, and ped
isiands
3.1 Paiomar Street (Bay Blvd. to Orange Missing sidewalks, crosswalks, and $118,108
Avenue) curb ramps
3.2 Orange Avenue (Palomar St. to Second Curb extensions, crosswalks, missing $349,025
Ave.) sidewalks, and curb ramps
4 Industrial Blvd. (L Street to Anita Street) Missing sidewalks, and curb ramps $701,135
5 Fourth Avenue (Moss Street to Main Crosswalks and missing sidewalks $97,895
Street)
6 Quintard Street (Orange Ave. to First Ave.) Curb extensions, crosswaiks, missing $436,558
sidewalks, and curb ramps
7 Broadway (D Street to H Street) Crosswalks and pedestrian $76,940
signalization
8 Anita Street (Broadway to Third Avenue) Sidewalk widening, curb extensions, $291,259
crosswalks, and curb ramps
9 E. Orange Avenue (Max to 1-805) Curb extensions, crosswalks, and curb $195,872
ramps
10 Third Avenue (H Street to K Street) Curb extensions, crosswalks, restriping, $297,000
and curb ramps
11 Third Avenue (E Streetto H Street) Sidewalk widening, curb extensions, $350,510
crosswaiks, and curb ramps
12 C Street/Third Avenue (Fifth Avenue to E Sidewalk widening, curb extensions, $552,759
Street) ped Island, crosswalks, and curb ramps
13 Broadway (Moss Street to Main Street) Crosswalks and pedestrian $136,051
signalization
14 G Street (Broadway to Third Avenue) Sidewalk widening, crosswalks, and $465,680
curb ramps
15 H Street (1-5 to Second Avenue) Sidewaik widening, curb extensions, $156,470
crosswalks, and curb ramps
16 Fourth Avenue (SR-54 to H Street) Sidewalk widening, curb extensions, $127,925
crosswalks, and curb ramps
17 Fifth Avenue (F Street to H Street) Crosswalks $28,100
18 Oxford Street (Broadway to Second Curb extensions, crosswalks, missing $269,619
Avenue) sidewalks, and curb ramps
19 Broadway (H Street to Moss Street) Pedestrian signalization and $58,460
crosswalks
20 E Street (1-5 to Third Avenue Curb extensions, crosswalks, and curb $193,925
ramps
21 Moss Street (Industrial Blvd. to Third Missing sidewalks and curb ramps $486,016
Avenue)
PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN 279 DRAFT 4/2/10
13-7
[FUNDING]
Table 8.3
Intersection and Corridor Pro'ects (continued)
22 Fourth Avenue (H Street to Moss Street) . Curb extensions, crosswalks, and curb $237,980
ramps
23 I Street (Fourth Avenue to Second Avenue) Curb extensions, crosswalks, and curb $269,000
ramps
24 Naples Street (Industrial Blvd. to Fifth Avenue) Curb extensions, crosswalks, missing $854,280
sidewalks, and curb ramps
25 L Street (Industrial Blvd, to Fifth Avenue) Ladder crosswalks and signage in front of $84,324
school
26 J Street (Fourth Avenue to Second Avenue) Crosswalks $28,100
27 K Street (Fourth Avenue to Second Avenue) Crosswalks $24,800
28 Paseo Ranchero/Heritage Road and Telegraph Ladder crosswalks and pedestrian $38,990
Canyon Road Intersection signalization
29 Olay Lakes RoadlBonita Road Intersection Raised median, crosswalk, and restriping $41,795
30 Medicai Center DrivelTelegraph Canyon Road Ladder crosswalks and restriping $27,440
TOTAL COSTTOP30 PROjECTS' ---- . .,.,"'.
(2910 Doliars) .... $8,459,452
Som:ce: Alta Planning + Design; 1hrch 2010
13-8
Attachment 3: Proposed 5-year program
'''''..~~-''~._....'''' '''''';'''''''f'''!:l'lllltl_'''',~ .~"'~. .~.' ..._,....".~'~..<< ,~'i.~ ."'.".?...~-,.'" -~.".~ ,.',~ V j' .<="0"'_ ..,., ~.",. _'r, -'Y' -~......."~..~~."''''''
~,y;earl term~jit~~"Wt~f~A'1ih~~~\f~~:.t~~.~~r&~~$g:'I;Y..ear~~1~~,!t~.~ Y:,earI.2~if.r\~ ;t;e'ar;3~~~;'!~ ;;;.~~ X e-a..r{4~~~:;.' ~ earJ5~~'i;e~ 5~yeah:total ~W:;
High prioritt.E!.':'iects I .
ProJect 1 I $ 342.260 I $ 342.260
~.ct 2.1 . $ 567,485 I __ ._ $ 597,485
Project 2.2 $ 553.691 I I $ 553.691
Project 3.1 $ 118,108 .! $ 118,108
Project 3.2 I $ 349,025 $ 349,025
Project 4 $ 174,795 $ 526,340 $ 701,135
Subtotal $ 460,368 $ 567,485 $ 553,691. $ 523,820 $ 526,340.1 2,631,7Q.'!..
Citywide proiects recommended in Plan
~ldewaJl:..~p infill $ 906,5~5 $ 906,595 $ 9Q6,595 I $ 906,595 $ 906,595 $ 4,532,975
Curb ramp retrofit $ 231 ,500 $ 231,500 $ 231,500 I $ 231,500 $ 231,500 $ 1,157,5Q.Q..
Subtotal $ 1,138,095 $ 1,138,095 $ 1,138,095 $ 1,138,095 $ 1,138,095 $ 5,690,475
Programs recommended in Plan
Promotion $ 79,000 $ 79,000 $ 79,000 $ 79,000 $ 79,000 $ 395"D..QQ..
Enforcement $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000' $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000
Subtotal $ 89,000 $ 89,000 $ 89,000 $ 89,000 $ 89,000 $ 445,000
~
w Soft costs (incl. personnel) .
I $ 242,000 $ 242,000 $ 242,000 $ 242,000 $ 242,000 $ 1,210,000
CD
Summ_~y of costs
High priority projects $ 460,368 $ 567,485 $ 553,691 -~ 523,820 $ 52~,340 $ 2,631,704
Citywide projects $ 1,138,095 $ 1 ,138,095 $ 1,138,095 $ 1,138,095 $ 1,138,095 $ 5,690,475
ProQram costs $ 89,000 $ 89,000 $ 89,000 $ 89,000 $ 89,000 $ 445,000
Soft costs(personnel) $ 242,000 $ 242,000 $ 242,000 $ 242,000 $ 24.2,000 $ 1,210,000
Total Costs $ 1,929,463 $ 2,036,580 $ 2,022,786 $ 1,992,915 $ 1,995,435 $ 9,977,179
Annual funding requirements $ 1,929,463 $ 2,036,580 $ 2,022,78.6__$ 1,992,915 $ 1,9952435 $ 9,977,179
'Estimated competitive arant revenue (70% of capital) $ 1,350,624 $ 1,425,606 $ 1,415,950 $ 1,395,041 $ 1,396,805 $ 6,984,025
Additional local match needed annually $ 578,839 $ 610,974 $ 606,836 $ 597,875 $ 598,631 $ 2,993,154
)>
-l
-l
)>
(')
:r:
S
m
z
-l
.-t:
ATTACHMENT 5
FAQ: Help with ftp.chulavistaca.gov connections
The City ofChula Vista's FTPsite requires the use of what are known as "active" FTP
connections. If you are having trouble connecting to our FTP site you may have to
change your browser or FTP client settings.
Browser-based FTP setup
Internet Explorer 6.0
1. Start Internet Explorer.
2. Click Internet Options on the Tools menu.
3. Click the Advanced tab.
4. Click Enable Folder View for FTP sites.
5. Enter the URL ftp:!/ftp.chulavistaca.gov and click on the Go button or press
Enter.
6. You will be prompted for a username and password. Enter the credentials
provided to you.
7. For more information, see http://support.microsoft.comlkb/309816
Internet Explorer 7
1. Start Internet Explorer.
2. On the Tools menu, click Internet Options.
3. Click the Advanced tab.
4. Under Browsing, click the Enable folder view for FTP sites check box.
5. Click to uncheck the Use Passive FTP (for firewall and DSL modem
compatibility) check box.
6. Click OK.
7. Enter the URL ftp://ftp.chulavistaca.gov and click on the Go button or press
Enter.
8. You will be prompted for a username and password. Enter the credentials
provided to you.
9. Note:
a. Your company's firewall may require you to the formulate the URL in this
manner: ftp://<username>:<password>@ftp.chulavistaca.gov.
b. For more information, see http://support.microsoft.comlkb/323446
10. If none of these work, try using Windows Explorer:
a. Open Windows Explorer.
b. In the Address bar at the top, enter the URL ftp://ftp.chulavistaca.gov and
click on the Go button or press Enter.
c. You will be prompted for a username and password. Enter the credentials
provided to you.
Internet Explorer 8
1. Start Internet Explorer.
2. On the Tools menu, click Internet Options.
Connie ulwthers Page 1
C:\Documenls and Seltings\BethOLocal Seltings\Temporary ble~:: IrbS\OLK4\FTP Help.doc
\
3/3012010
3. Click the Advanced tab.
4. Click to uncheck the Use Passive FTP (for firewall and DSL modem
compatibility) check box.
5. Click OK.
6. Close Internet Explorer.
7. Open Windows Explorer.
S. In the Address bar at the top, enter the URL ftp://ftp.chulavistaca.gov and click on
the Go button or press Enter.
9. You will be prompted for a username and password. Enter the credentials
provided to you.
Firefox
1. Mozilla recommends using FireFIP. See http://fireftp.mozdev.org/help.html
2. Once installed, open FireFIP.
3. Create a new account or edit an existing one by clicking 'Edit'.
4. In the Account Manager, select the "Connection" tab.
5. Uncheck the "Passive Mode" option.
FTP Clients
For example, FileZilla, CuteFIP or WS-FTP
1. Set FTP clients to use active FIP whenever possible.
Connie Lawthers Page 2
C\Documl!nts and Seuings\BelhC\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK4\FTP J-lelp.doc
. 13-11
3/3012010
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, on July 22, 2008 the Chula Vista City Council approved an agreement between
the City and Alta Planning + Design for development of the City's first Pedestrian Master Plan. The
goal ofthe Plan was to identify and prioritize pedestrian improvement projects based on technical
analysis and community input, thereby promoting orderly implementation on a citywide basis and
enhancing the City's ability to secure funding; and
WHEREAS, Alta has obtained input from community groups and local residents in the
preparation of this plan. The recommendations were formed in collaboration with a Stakeholders'
Group and the findings werc presented in four Citywide forums; and
WHEREAS, the Pedestrian Master Plan has identified 30 priority locations Citywide for the
construction of pedestrian improvements. These locations will be used to guide future grant
applications and Capital Improvement Projects for pedestrian improvements; and
WHEREAS, the plan has been completed and was presented to the Safety Commission for
discussion on June 2, 20 I 0; and
WHEREAS, at the June 2, 2010 meeting, the Safety Commission passed a resolution
recommending adoption of the Pedestrian Master Plan by City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City ofChula Vista
does hereby adopt the Pedestrian Master Plan.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Richard A. Hopkins
Director of Public Works
-
~/]~0/7 ~
Bart M. Miesfeld
City Attorney
13-12