Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResource Conservation Commission Min 1991/02/11 .. . . . , MINUTES OF A SCHEDULED REGULAR MEETING Resource Conservation Commission Chula Vista, California 6:00 p.m. Monday, February 11, 1991 Conference Room 1 Public Services Building CALL MEETING TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: Meeting was called to order with a quorum at 6:20 p.m. by Chairman Fox. City Staff Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid called roll. Present: Commissioners Ray, Johnson, Hall, and Kracha. Absent: Stevens and Ghougassian. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It. was MSUP to approve the minutes of January 21, 1991 with one correction: Paragraph 2, should be corrected to ".. . report for Debra Frisher of the City of Chula Vista... " OLD BUSINESS: A. Bud Gray and Phil Carter clarified answers to questions put forth by Commissioners on the Growth Management Plan and Ordinance. Notes and comments will be implemented into the presentation to City Council. Discussion and recommendations were made on the Plan and Ordinance. A motion was made by Kracha to forward and recommend the Growth Management Program for approval with the following exceptions: Reword the threshold standards to be more specific in areas of schools, water, sewer and air quality and to defer the inclusion of economics, Civic Center and Corporation yard until it is recommended for incorporation by the Growth Management Oversight Committee, and that our members with specific comments and responses are attached; with amendment to adopt threshold standards for water; motion seconded by Fox. (Commissioner Johnson left the meeting at 7:15 p.m.) In discussion, Fox amended the motion to include: A recommendation be made to our Assemblyman and State Senator to alter state law so that we may adopt threshold standards as they pertain to schools; Kracha agreed to the amendment. Further discussion included measurable performance standards to be established within (six months) as it relates to school, water, air quality. It was explained that the economics has a standard but it should be more quantifiable. Question was asked whether to quantify all of these with more measurable standards; answered by Mr. Gray. Mr. Carter gave explanations on the inclusion of the plan; the economic, civic center and corporation yard's six month time period; an economic standards is already in existence, so a recommendation should be made that it be updated and more quantifiable. Fox amended his motion to include it be quantifiable for economics only. . . . . Page 2 B. C. 2. A. After further discussion, the motion was restated by Kracha as follows: Forward, recommending approval of the Growth Management Plan and Ordinance with the following exceptions: City should adopt measurable threshold standards for water, schools and air quality; letters be sent to our Assemblyman and State Senator so that applicable state laws may be altered so that the city can adopt threshold standards for schools; in the areas of economics, civic center and corporation yard, that measurable performance standards be established within six months; as it pertains to economics, that they be more quantifiable; and specific comments and responses be attached; Fox affirmed his second on the motion; motion carried unanimously. RCC Budget for Fiscal Year 1991/1992 was explained by Doug Reid. It was MSUP (Ray /Fox) to approve the.proposed RCC budget with an amendment to reallocate dues to the San Diego Historical Society to the Travel, Conference and Meeting budget and increase office supplies by a minimum of 10%; motion carried. Items left for action on the "Environmental Agenda for the 90's" include #2,24,25,33,44 and 52. The secretary will include in next meeting's agenda all action previously taken by RCC. NEW BUSINESS Items for the Planning Commission Agenda for the meeting of February 13, 1991 were reviewed and included the following: (1) Public Hearing on Variance ZA V-91-1O was continued. (2) Consideration of EIR 90-10, Rohr Office Complex was continued. (3) Public Hearing on Conditional Use Permit PCC-91-OO: It was MSUP (RaylHall) that RCC recommend that the CUP should be periodically reviewed and that a time limit be set prior to review to ensure the use of recycled water. (4) PCM-91-5/PCA-91-3, Growth Management Program previously discussed; no further action by Commission. (5) Amendment #1 to the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area; Staff recommendation is approval; no action by Commission. B. Review of the following Negative Declarations: (1) It was MSUP (KrachalRay) to recommend for adoption IS-91-12, 1-5 Billboard Initial Study, with one correction on Page 3, under Item E, paragraph 6, line 3: ".. .the billboard at this location are not deemed significant..." (2) It was MSUP (Ray /Fox) to recommend for adoption IS-91-13, General Plan & Zoning Consistency Study, with a correction under D.4. ParklRecreation: "The Threshold/Standards Policy requires 3 acres of park and recreation land for every 1,000 people. It is not relevant to the proposed Zoning/General Plan Consistency Study because it is not a violation to threshold standards. " .. . . . Page 3 (3) It was MSUP (KrachaIFox) to recommend for adoption IS-91-17, Zoning Text Amendment. (4) It was MSUP (RaylFox) to recommend for adoption IS-91-19, Brunswick Family Recreation Center, and RCC further recommends that the CUP be periodically reviewed. It is noted that the Wtotal proposed range of acresw has been determined to specifically be 1.5 acres per 1000 population. (5) It was MSUP (HalllRay) to recommend for adoption IS-91-20, Growth Management Program & Ordinance. (6) It was MSUP (RaylKracha) to recommend for adoption IS-91-23, Cal Stores Warehouse Addition. (7) It was moved by Ray to recommend adoption of the mitigated monitoring program, however, also recommend the project itself be denied due to an unnecessary change. Both parts of the motion were tabled and Ray withdrew his motion. The Planning Commission is waiting for approval or denial and also waiting to hear from Community Development. This item tabled to the next meeting. COMMISSION COMMENTS Ray requests that the City develop and include mitigation monitoring on all Conditional Use Permits. Fox requests an item for next agenda include how council can establish monitoring programs. Also for next agenda, add the wEnvironmental Agenda for the 90's. W ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Fox at 9:01 p.m. Respectfully submitted, EXPRESS SECRETARIAL SERVICES ~~ Barbara Taylor