HomeMy WebLinkAboutResource Conservation Commission Min 1991/01/07
~
.
.
,
&,
\.~'/"-
,-". '
~-,'1'
,'~i~,;:r...
'"'By: XEROX Telecopier 7017: 1- 6-91
1 : 25PM
...."TTV
I........ I I
OF CHUL,A
VISTA :# 2
MINUTES OF A SCHEDULED REGULAR MEETING
Resource Conservation Commission
Chula Vista, California
6:00 p.m.
Monday, January 7, 1991
Conference Room 1
Public Services Building
CALL MEETING TO ORDERIROLL CALL: Meeting was called to order with a quorum at 6: 10 p.m.
by Chairman F01:. City Staff Barbara Reid called roll. Present: Commissioners Ray, Johnson, Hall, Fox,
Kracha. Absent: Ghougassian, Stevens.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was MSUP (KrachalRay) to approve the minutes of November 12, 1990
with one correction: the word "Permits (I should be added at the bottom of Page 1. The minutes of
November 19, 1990 were unanimously approved.
NEW BUSINESS:
A. Lance Fry, Assistant Planner, provided follow-up information on Chula Vista 2000. After much
discussion, the following recommendations were made:
1. It was MSUP (Ray/Krach a) to support staff recommendation on the recycling effort.
2. It was MSUP (Ray/Krach a) that council direct the preparation of a citywide open space and
parkland master plan and to emphasize the western area of the city for the purpose of further review
of the feasibility of open space and. parkland acquisition and development.
3. It was MSUP (Johnson/Hall) that Council support staff assistance to city volunteers dedicated
to the city trails tree planting program and other public lands; and identify a program coordinator
for this effort.
4. It was MSUP (KrachalRay) to encourage placement of citizens from environmental groups on
city committees and commissions dealing with environmental and open space issues.
B. The Rohr Office Complex EIR 90-10 was reviewed by staff. After much discussion, a motion was
made (Fox/Ray) to include the followinj: to recommend to the Plannina Commission that Kracha's
comments of inconsistencies of the EIR be incorporated with the exception of _the last comment
regarding support of Alternate 2; that Hall's question regarding paragraph 3-50 be clarified; that Ray
requests that the Planning Commission not close the public review hearing until the inconsistencies
and issues in the EIR are resolved; motion passed unanimously.
A motion was made by Hall to recommend an off-site alternative listed as #1 on pase 4-7; motion
died due to lack of second.
C. It was MSUP (Fox/Ray) to continue the item regarding "Environmental Agenda for the 90s" to the
next meeting with review of previous minuteA back to July 1990.
D.
It was MSUP (Ray/1ohnson) to continue the budget discussion to the next meeting and have staff
clarify items regarding prlntina and binding, photography, and postage.
/----
/
7-
/