HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm min 1971/05/03 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
May 3, 1971
The regular meeting of the City Planning Commission of Chula Vista, California
was held on the above date beginning at 7:00 p.mo with the following members
present: Rice, Stewart, Adams, Chandler, Macevicz, James and Hillsono Also
present: Director of Planning Warren, Senior Planner Williams, City Engineer
Gesley and Assistant City Attorney Blick.
Chairman Rice led the pledge of allegiance to the flag, followed by a moment
of silent prayer,
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Chairman Rice asked that the minutes of April 19, 1971, under Commission Comments
on page 12, be corrected to indicate that his comment concerning the dedication
of Commission members made reference to the time and effort required in the
performance of duties, during the meeting and in preparatory assignments and
tasks outside of the meeting.
MSUC (Chandler-Macevicz) Minutes of the meeting of April 19, 1971, be approved
as corrected and the minutes of the meeting of April 26, 1971, be approved as mailed.
Consideration of proposed Capital Improvements Pro~ram
Director of Planning Warren r~minded the Commission the Capital Improvement
Program was forwarded to them for review and to give them an opportunity to make
a finding to the City Council concerning its conformance to the General Plan. The
1971-72 expenditure summary would become a part of the next annual budget and the
remaining five years included in the program are subject to change in the review of
the budget each ye&r.
Mr. Warren advised that the Commission consideration should be whether the improve-
ment items conform to the anticipated growth and development of the City as
projected Dy the General Plan rather than with the funding of the program.
Member Hillson questioned the Regional Tennis Center listed as a carryover project
and suggested that it be delayed until the City can better afford it and the money
set aside for that item could be used for a more urgent need or to reduce taxes.
Member Macevicz expressed the opinion that this tennis center is already lar§ely
constructed and possibly the City has not paid its share of the joint City-School
project.
Bill Jasinek, Director of Parks and Recreation, advised that the portion of the
tennis center that is com@leted was totally college financeq. The portion~to ~e
constructed by the City w~ll consist of 4 lighted courts ana a club house ~aci/ity.
-2- 5/3/71
He pointed out this project has been delayed before due to a problem of site
selection, the funds have been budgeted and set aside. The plans have been
prepared and have been sent to the State Division of Architecture for approval
since the facility will be located on school property.
Chairman Rice asked for information on the item of Land Acquisition - J Street.
Lane Cole, Director of Public Works, pointed out the location of the land proposed
for acquisition which, together with excess land being acquired from the State
Division of Highways, would provide a little over 6 acres. He pointed out this
site is quite low and they propose to build it up on a long range basis and use
it for a neighborhood park at a future date.
Bob Bourcier, Assitant City Manager, pointed out this program was developed by
a committee of 5 or 6 department heads and himself and it will go before the
City Council with the rest of the budget.
Member Hillson co~nented that he would like to see the recreational items given
the lowest priority on the budget and the other items which are more or less
mandatory for basic development of the City given priority ahead of them.
Chairman Rice expressed his feeling that some of the recreational expenditures are
as essential as any other items since recreational facilities are a direct benefit
to the children and as the city develops higher density residential areas, it is
imperative that the city provide recreational facilities to meet the needs of the
residents.
Member Hillson stated he was referring only to items proposed for the 71-72 program.
Member Stewart felt the program as submitted is in conformance with the General Plan.
MSUC (Stewart-Macevicz) Recommend to the City Council that the 1971-72 Capital
Improvement Program conforms to the General Plan.
PUBLIC HEARING (Cont.): VARIANCE - South side of East J~ east of 1-805 - Division
of parcel into 4 lots to be served by easement - Thomas O. Terry
Director of Planning Warren recalled that this hearing was continued to this meeting
in an attempt to obtain more information on development problems relating to
sewerage, drainage and compaction, and concerning the area of level land available.
The applicant originally proposed division into four lots and considerable objection
to such development was presented at the previous meeting. The applicant has
retained an engineer who did some survey work on the site and has submitted a new
rendering depicting more accurately the level area and if developed into three lots
each would be in excess of that required for single family lots.
With regard to the problem of sewer, Mr. Warren expressed the belief that it is
feasible to pump into the sewer line in J Street and he recommended that this be~
made a condition in granting the variance.
-3- 5/3/71
The Chairman called for additional testimony concerning the granting of this
variance.
Tom Harris, owner of the property, reported that he can now assure the Commission
that over 30,000 square feet of the area is perfectly level, He expressed agree-
ment with dividing the property into three lots and stated that he has no objections
to the conditions recommended by the staff. He wants this development to be
compatible with the adjacent area and if this means connecting to the sewer that
will be done.
Aubrey Kesterson, 428 East J Street, again raised objection to granting a variance
that would permit the development of lots served by an easement as he felt this
would lower the value of adjacent lots.
Anita Haynes, 438 East J Street, again objected to the development of any lots
served by an easement and felt all lots should have the required frontage on a
dedicated street as the adjacent area is presently developed,
As no one else wished to speak, for or against, the public hearing was closed.
Member Adams expressed his support of permitting the development of three lots on
this site with the conditions outlined by the staff and an added condition that each
site shall have two additional offstreet parking places in addition to the 2 car
garage requirement, and also that each of the lots be required to hook up to the
sewer line.
MSUC (Adams-Macevicz) Approval of a variance for the property on the south side of
RESOLUTION PCV-71-9 East J Street for the division of the property into three
lots, subject to the conditions specified by the staff and
the added conditions stated above.
Findings are as follows:
a) That a hardship peculiar to the property and not created by any act of the
owner exists.
Because of the lot configuration it is impractical to create any additional
lots with street frontage.
b) That this variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
substantial property rights possessed by other proper~ie$inthe same zone and in
the vicinity of the subject property.
This variance is necessary to create any additional lots, the subject
property and all those that surround the property are zoned for 7,000
square feet.
c) That the authorizing of this variance will not be of substantial detriment to
adjacent property and will not materially impair the purposes of this Ordinance or
the public interest.
The lots created will be in conformance with all other provisions of the
Zoning Ordinance, and therefore not detrimental.
-4- 5/3/71
d) That the granting of a variance will not be contrary to the objectives of
the General Plan.
The proposed development will be in conformance with the General Plan,
Chairman Rice advised of the right of appeal to the City Council within ten days.
PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 345 F Street - Locate mobile classroom~
30' x 60' - Sweetwater Union High School District
Director of Planning Warren displayed a plot plan of the proposed development and
related it to the proposed Civic Center complex. He advised that the trailers are
now on the lot and have been for some time as the schools were not aware of the need
for a permit which is required by the Zoning Ordinance. There have been no complaints
concerning this use and the staff recommends approval subject to annual review Dy the
Commission to determine compatibility and the need for continuance of the use.
The public hearing was opened and Bob Randall, Principal of Chula Vista Adult
School, advised that these classrooms are used for Manpower Development Training
classes, The instruction is mostly in English as a second language and job
orientation, This program is funded for 52 weeks,
There being no further comment, the public hearing was closed°
MSUC (Chandler)Macevicz) Approval of a conditional use permit for the use of
RESOLUTION NO, PCC-71-7 mobile classrooms at 345 F Street by the Sweetwater
Union High School District, subject to the following
condition:
This use shall be subject to annual review by the Planning Commission to determine
the continuing need and compatibility of the use. When the Planning Commission
determines that such use is no longer appropriate or compatible with the uses in the
area, the conditional use permit shall be revoked or conditions imposed which would
make this use compatible.
Findings are as follows:
a. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary or desirable
to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well-being
of the neighborhood or the community,
The facility is well located near major and collector streets to serve the
entire Sweetwater Union High School district°
bo That such use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity.
Because of the separation from adjacent residential uses and the temporary
nature of the use, there will be no detrimental effect°
c. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified
in the Code for such use.
All conditions and regulations will be complied with.
-5- 5/3/7l
d. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely affect
the General Plan of the City of Chula Vista or the adopted plan of any governmental
agency.
The General Plan is not affected.
PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 338 West Bay Boulevard - Automobile
disman'tling and Salvage - Jack L. Stanley "
Director of Planning Warren pointed out the location of the one acre site between
Interstate 5 and the railroad right of way. This is excess property owned by the
State Division of Highways which will not be needed for the widening of the freeway.
Mro Warren pointed out that owners of other salvage yards in the area have indicated
their intent to phase out those uses within the next two years. The staff, therefore,
recommends denial of this request as it is inconsistent with the change in the trend
for the area.
The public hearing was opened, but as no one present wished to speak, for or against,
the public hearing was closed.
MSUC (Stewart-James) The request for a conditional use permit for automobile
dismantling and salvage at 338 West Bay Boulevard be denied based on the findings
presented.
PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING - 176 Third A_~enue, R-3 to C-T-P - Castle Plymouth, Inc.
Director of Planning Warren indicated the location of a vacant lot, 50 feet wide,
extending from Third Avenue to Landis, adjacent to property owned by Castle Plymouth
which was recently approved for rezoning to C-T-P, subject to implementation of a
precise plan. The necessary agreement for development of that property has not been
executed by the owner and it is now their desire to include this additional lot in
their expansion program. Mr. Warren discussed the applicant's proposal for development
of this total site and expressed his opinion that granting this zone change request
would not lead to further expansion down Third Avenue because this would accomplish
the total development for this operation.
The public hearing was opened, and Gus Pappas, representing Castle Plymouth, discussed
their plans for expansion and contended that granting this rezoning would permit a
better esthetic development for not only the corner property at Third and E, but for
the entire parcel. The use of this portion of the property for new car storage only
would serve as a buffer between the commercial use and the adjacent residential area°
Mr. Pappas indicated the applicant's acceptance of the conditions recommended by the
staff that this lot would be used only for new car storage and that there would be no
access directly to this lot from Third Avenue - access would be from their adjacent
property.
The Commission questioned the estimated time for improving this property and Mr° Joe
Husk, Manager of Castle Plymouth, confirmed that they have plans, if this rezoning is
granted, to request bids immediately for improvement of the property, with construction
to commence within 30 days and be completed hopefully by October of this year°
-6- 5/3/71
Don Rolstad, sa}esman with Paul Miller Realty, handling the sale of this property,
spoke of the problems in attempting to develop it under R-3 zoning due to the long
narrow configuration of the lot. He felt the proposed expansion by Castle Plymouth
would provide the best development for the property and urged the Commission to
favorably consider the request for rezoningo
As no one else wished to speak, the public hearing was closed°
The Commission further discussed the conditions proposed by the staff and concurred
this would result in development compatible with the area.
MSUC (Macevicz-Adams) Recommend to the City Council the change of zone for property
RESOLUTION PCZ-71-H at 176 Third Avenue from R-3 to C-T-P, with the Precise Plan
subject to the following conditions:
1. Subject property shall be used only for the storage of new automobiles°
2. There shall be no ingress or egress to this parcel from Third Avenue or Landis
Avenue; the only access shall be from within the development.
3. A 10 foot landscaped area shall be provided on Landis Avenue and 15 foot area on
Third Avenue. All landscaped areas shall be provided with an appropriate irrigation
system approved by the staff.
4. An 8 foot high decorative wall shall be provided behind the landscaped areas
and on the north line to enclose the storage area.
5. Subject rezoning shall become effective upon approval of a precise plan by the
Planning Commission.
Findings are as follows:
a. Expansion of the commercial area is necessary to accommodate modern development
standards° The attachment of the precise plan modifying district and the conditions
required for approval will minimize the effect on adjacent properties.
b. This change is in conformance with the General Plan in that it is a logical
expansion of a recognized commercial use.
Consideration of Precise Plan for 621 L Street - Imperial Truck Lines~ Inc.
PUBLIC HEARING (cont./.. VARIANCE - 621L Street~ reduction, in rear ~ard~ 5~' to o~
Imperial Truck Lines~ Inc.
Director of Planning Warren reminded the Commission recommended rezoning of this
property to I-L based upon approval of a precise plano This rezoning and an appeal of
the conditional use permit approved by the Commission will be considered at the City
Council meeting this week.
-7- 5/3/71
Mr. Warren displayed the applicant's plan in which the location of the service
building at the northeast corner of the property would necessitate a variance from
the 50 foot setback required on industrial property adjacent to residential lotso
The staff has recommended that this service building be located west of the existing
building, thus eliminating the need for the variance.
The Chairman opened the public hearing for the variance and for discussion of the
proposed plan for development.
Donald Worley, attorney with Seltzer, Caplan, Wilkins and McMahon, San Diego,
representing the owners of the property and Imperial Truck Lines, lessees, spoke
concerning the guidelines established for the precise plan, particularly one which
stated: "No truck access shall be granted from L Street between the existing
structure and the westerly property line unless the applicant can show that such
access will not interfere with the proposed use of this area for employee parking
and l az~scapingoo." and another for the possible relocation of the proposed wash
building.
Mro Worley discussed the general traffic pattern followed in the operations of this
truck terminal and pointed out the advantage of using the westerly access for exit
of trucks during the day time hours. He contended use of this access would not pre-
clude furnishing the required number of parking spaces for employees. In discussing
location of the service building, Mr. Worley pointed out that their revised plans
would locate this building 8 or 10 feet from the northern property line so they would
not require a 0 setback. He also advised that the area west of the dock and office
building is us,ed for the storage of merchandise unloaded from the large trailers on
to pallets to be reloaded on to Mexican trucks for delivery across the border, He
estimated this comprises about 40% of the business. He contended it would be a serious
impediment to the flow of traffic and orderly operation of the terminal to place the
service building any place other than the northeast corner of the property. He also
pointed out that a building placed at that location with the only opening on the south
side of the building would direct the noise from the servicing of the trucks away from
the adjacent residential lots and toward L Street and other industrial uses.
In answer to questions from the Commission, Mr. Worley confirmed that the service
building would be 16 feet high, of masonry construction, and closed on three sides with
the only door on the south side.
Zorum Hurt, Manager of the terminal, confirmed that the repairs to be done at this
facility would be minor, including such items as water pump, fan belt, and the
checking and changing of tires° He stated this work is now done in the open area. Mro
Hurt also confirmed that a 10' setback from the property line can be observed.
Member Stewart asked if it is not common practice to leave diesel trucks idling for
long periods of time within the yard.
Mr, Hurt said, absolutely not° The drivers have been given strict orders to turn the
motors off. When asked if he would accept that as a condition for operation after
10:00 pom~, Mr. Hurt stated that he would.
-8- 5/3/71
Herbert Young, 873 Riverlawn, reported that the wall constructed at this location
as a barrier against the noise was only completed about three months ago and it
has seemed to lessen the noise° However, since the heaviest activity of the truck
terminal is during the summer and fall months, Mr. Young requested a six month
continuance of the variance application in order to determine what the effect of the
wall will be during the busiest time.
The public hearing was closed and in discussion the Commission agreed that erecting
tile service building as an enclosure for activities now performed in the open area
should help to make this use more compatible with the adjacent uses. It was also
pointed out that the unusual depth of the two lots adjacent to the area proposed for
the location of the service building results in the dwellings being further from the
rear property line than is the case on other lots. The Commission concurred that this
plan represents the best solution to problems which have arisen from an existing use.
MSUC (Chandler-Macevicz) Approval of a variance for reduction of a portion of the
RESOLUTION NO. PCV-71-4 rear yard setback from 50' to l0t on property located at
621 L Street, for the construction of a masonry service
building, 40~ x 50' x 16t high, to be located adjacent to
the northerly property line, subject to the following
conditions:
1o The only door to this building shall be on the south side facing L Street.
2. There shall be no windows on the westerly or northerly sides of the building.
Findings are as follows:
a. That a hardship peculiar to the property and not created by any act of the owner
exists°
Applicant is unable to construct any structure within the perimeter defined by
the 50 foot side and rear yard requirements along the westerly and northerly
boundaries of the property adjacent to R-2 property because there would be
insufficient maneuvering room for the trucking operation equipment°
bo That this variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property rights possessed by other properties in the same zone and in the vicinity of
the subject property.
This variance will permit the applicant to continue operations which have been
conducted on the property since 1950 with less impairment to adjacent residential
use,
Co That the authorizing of this variance will not be of substantial detriment to
adjacent property and will not materially impair the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance
or the public interest°
Location of the service buildin~ with the only opening facing toward L Street
will direct the noise from service work away from adjacent dwellings. The
adjacent lots are of unusual depth and the residences are sufficiently far away.
-9- 5/3/71
do That the granting of a variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the
General Plano
The General Plan is not affected by~:this variance.
Chairman Rice advised of the right of anyone to appeal this decision to the City
Council within l0 days,
PUBLIC HEARING: VARIANCE - 440 Woodlawn - Reduction of front yard from 15 feet and
20 feet to 2!¢eet for fence - Crown Investment Propertie~ Ltd~
Director of Planning Warren indicated the location of the Holiday Gardens apartments
south of G Street and fronting on Colorado and Woodlawn Avenues. This is a series
of four-plexes on 42 lots, comprising a total of 168 units with the available
parking at a ratio of l:l. In some cases this parking is directly in front of sliding
glass doors. It is proposed to permit parking in the front setback area to be
screened with 6' high fencing which would be located 2' inside the property lineo
This would permit 4' of landscaping since the property line is 2' from the sidewalk°
Mr. Warren reported this would increase the parking ratio to approxi~k~tely 1-1/2:l
and would also provide more privacy for patio areas, He indicated there would be no
reduction in the available on-street parking as existing curb cuts will be used°
The public hearing was opened,
Eleanor Hill, architect, representing Crown Investment Properties, Ltd,, offered a
correction to the comments presented indicating there would be some new curb cuts -
three on each street - connected with this improvement plan. She also indicated
acceptance of the conditions recommended by the staff,
As no one else wished to speak, the public hearing was closed,
MSUC (Stewart-Chandler) Approval of a variance requested by Crown Investment
RESOLUTION NO, PCV-71-10 Properties, Ltd°, for reduction of front setback to 2'
for construction of a 6' fence to screen parking and
patio areas,
This variance is subject to the following conditions:
1. The lots shall be consolidated into one parcel or as otherwise approved by the
staff.
2o Planters, fencing and parking details shall be submitted and approved by staff.
3. An irrigation system for the entire project shall be submitted and approved by
staff,
4. Approval by Engineering Division of additional curb cuts.
Findings:are as follows:
-10- 5/3/71
ao That a hardship peculiar to the property and not created by any act of the
owner exists.
The development was constructed prior to the present zoning requirements
for off-street parking and site plan review process°
b. That this variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
substantial property rights possessed by others in the same zone and in the
vicinity of the subject property.
Properties developed under the present Ordinance are required to provide more
parking and are also to provide for usable open space areas,
c. That the authorizing of this variance will not be of substantial detriment to
adjacent property and will not materially impair the purposes of the Ordinance or
the public interest.
Redevelopment of the properties will upgrade the general appearance of the
neighborhood and provide additional off-street parking.
d. That the granting of a variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the
General Plan.
The General Plan encourages the rehabilitation or renovation of older and
deteriorating areas,
Director's Report
Mr, Warren reported that the Zoning Enforcement Officer attended a two day training
session relating to performance standards covering the emission of polutants into
the air° He passed a test during this course which qualifies him for a State
Visible Emission Certification,
Commission Comments
Chairman Rice reported that he had attended a meeting in San Diego last week with
regard to a Ford Foundation grant for San Diego County to assist in setting up a
pilot program to improve the environment,
Mr. Warren reported briefly on a meeting held here this afternoon at which Mr.
Robert Small presented information on this program°
Members Adams, Rice, Chandler, Stewart and Hillson indicated their intention of
attending the tour of the Metropolitan Sewerage System on Saturday, May 22.
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p,m.
Respectfully submitted,
Helen So Mapes, Secretar~
Chula Vista Planning Commission