Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992/06/17 Board of Ethics Minutes . . . .' MINUTES OF A BOARD OF ETHICS MEETING CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA June 17, 1992 city Attorney's Conference Room 4:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Harriet Acton, Leo Kelly, Donald Swanson, Susan Herney and Jerry McNutt MEMBERS ABSENT: Stephen Padilla and Janet Richter (both unexcused) Ruth Fritsch, Assistant City Attorney f/til(f-- STAFF PRESENT: 1. The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Acton at 4:30 p.m. 2. MSUC (Herney/Kelly) the April 21, 1992 meeting. minutes for to the approve 3. Councilman Moore's Comments: Councilman Moore commented that the minutes of Boards and Commissions are helpful to him in his decision making and so he reads them religiously. His impression is that this Board is interested in pursuing a Code of Ethics to govern City employees. This is not wi thin the purview and the goals of the Board of Ethics, rather their responsibility is to assist in the governing of the conduct of the Councilmembers, the members of boards and commissions, the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the city Manager. The employees are covered by civil Service rules and they should not be subject to two sets of rules. In Councilman Moore's opinion, the Board of Ethics, to the extent it has been spending time on revising its Code of Ethics to include City employees is out of the bounds of its purpose. Members Swanson and McNutt took issue with Councilman Moore and said that it was within their purview to revise the Code in any manner that they believed fit. Member Herney stated that she had not been previously aware that the Board's proposed revised revision which would include an ability of the Board to refer the results of its investigations to the City Council could possibly result in inviting the City Council to commit a breach of the Charter which prohibits the councilmembers from interfering in administrative affairs. There was then a discussion about how to proceed with the proposed revisions. MSUC (Swanson/Kelly) to have the Board meet no sooner than ninety (90) days from now to evaluate the status of the proposed Incompatible Activities Code. The Chair is directed to send a letter to the Personnel Director with a copy to the City Manager stating that the Board has made proposed revisions to the . . . .- Board of Ethics Minutes June 17, 1992 Page 2 Code of Ethics, but is withholding presenting those proposals to the City Council pending the submission of the proposed Incompatible Activities Code to the city Council. MSUC (Kelly/McNutt) to adjourn at 5:55 p.m,./ (Minutes\Eth3)