HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm min 1967/07/17 Pk~T~ C~Ivl~s~:~Oi~ O~ C~J7~ ¥~STA, CAL~FO
July 17, 1967
The re~lam ~Jonrned meeting of the City Planning Commission va~ held or, the above
date at 7 p.m- in t~e Council Ch~ber, Civic O~ter~ 276 ~.~v~ Avenue, Ch~a Vista,
~th the fo.li~i~ ~mD~'~ ~emen~: St~, York, ~de, Gregso~, Rice, A~
City ~i~eer
~e Secret~ hereby ~..~es that ~he ~d ~st, ~i~hin 2~ ho~s ~ rea~ire8 by
the or,te~ for the ~o~ned meeti~ off J~ 6, 1967.
~PROV~ 0F M~
~UC ~-de~Gregson~ ~nute~ ~f the meeti~ of J~y 6, 196'~ be a:~roved, ~ m~iled.
, .~ No. 6 o~ the ~em~ ~ considered at 2~s t~ due f;o the :f~2 that the
~e~t.~ p~tie$ ~e ~ out of to~.
~est for Apprq%e~ ~_Pl~.s ~o~ Ap~ent~ - Northwest Corner of ~int~d ~ H~lto. ~e ~or e ~w~
Director of P!a~i~ ~e~ su~tt~ a plot pl~ of the propose& mp~tments ~
noted t~t the pr~erty co~!;~ns 27~000 sq~mre feet ~d ie zoned R-3-~D. The
appiic~t ~opomes to eonstz~et a n~ two zto~ zi~-~it ~p~me:~t ~il~i~ ~
convert ~, existi~ dw~lli~ lato t~ee a~ent ~tm; ~he e~i~ti~ b~[l~i~
stucco ~1~ with ~ c~position ~oof. ~e ~lot pl~ s~ $~ ae~ ~nits
Qe:~nterd. ~th ~ki~ for ~ xmite ~de~eaSh ~th ~ehic~l~ enforce ~'~ the
Gener~, the ~t~f believe~ the plot pl~ to be a go~ o~e; ~ more de~ile~
be ~pprove~ bef~e ies~ce off the buil~ ~m~t. The ~tafff s~esSed ~e t~
of sidi~ be ~de~ to the top floo~ to give a mo~e horizo;~t~ ~ppe~*~ce ~ ~h~t
l~scap~ ~o~ the ffo~mtion shoed ~o help im this concer~. ~.
stated t~t e~ ~teri~s ~e act c!e~ly ~e~iae~ ~ thi~ B~s been ~i~cA~e~ '~th
the b~l~er who is ~lli~ to :~ke ce~ain ch~ee.
Xa ~r to t~q~ries ~ the C~ssion, ~. ~en no,ed t~t thee ts suffic~
ie~t p~Eing ~ the ~dth off the ~ive~ gola~ to the p~king ~ea im
M~. Don ~rli~, rep:~so~i~ ~he app~e~t~ ~ote~ that the flcom elev~tioa is hill
tio~ 2~o~hout the ap~e~t e~lex. ~ ~p~li~ ~so atari, that h~ pl~m
~me m~e typ~ of h~izoat~. ~i~ir~ to ~ow~ th~ ~pe~'~ of h,i~t of the buildin~
b~ hm~ ~e mo definite pl~s o~ t~t p~obl~ ~t the ~emem2
MSUC (A~s-~de} Request for Ap~ov~ of P!~ for A~ts ~t the Noct~est Cor-
n~ ~f ~te=d Strut ~d Ni~t~ ~ive be Appr~e~ subJe~ to the follo~i~ condi,-
tio~:
-2-
1. A landscaping plan be aubmitte~ for staff approval prior to obtaining a building
permit.
2. That all materials to be use~ be define~ a~d approved before obtaining a build-
inE pe~it. Sc~e $ox~ of siding material should be used at least on the
souther~y facade to break up the height of the building. Substantial lan~ecaping
at the fo~,adation will help tie the building to the ground.
3. That final plane be submitted for staff approval,
_~..SkLI___~C.HEAR. ING: VA~._____~UE - Windsor P, erk ~%e~f~es r ~uth of ~en School ~e~
~ of ~es R~d - R~ue~t for R~ion of ~t Size
~e mpp~.c~ti~u w~ read ~ w~ch a request w~ ~e f~ a reduc'~ion of ~ea
~nt ~'~ 1 ~re to 15,000 sq~e f~ ~ ~ ~oposed in the tentative map of
~nit~ Tiaa Su~ivision for the establis~ent of a 92 lot sub~.vision.
Director of P~ W~ren s~itte~ a tentative map o~ ~nita Tiers 8u~ivii~ion
~ a~ised t~t the pretty in question is gener~ locate~ south ~ ~ll.en
Sch~l ~:e ~ west o~ 0t~ ~es Bo~ ~ch is pres~t~ interi~ zoned R-l-~
~ w~ zone~ for 1/2 acre lots when in the Oo~ty. ~e ~pplic~ is
t~ssion *~o b~ld ~ ~2 lot sv.~ivision on 86 ~res of ~d, the lot simes
wo~ v~ ~ 15~0~0 sq~e ~eet to 78~000 sq~e feet. ~-. ~en note~ that
~evel~i~ th* ~vopc~y ~th ~Is pl~ wo~ enable the $~bdi~i~er ~ t~e ~-
t~e o~~ the ~tur~ ~p~ of the 1~. ~. ~?en ~ther ~ote~ t~t the
st~f is rec~men4~ ~pp~v~ oC this ~eq~st base~ ~n the ~cept~ce of ~ finet
~p ~hfch t~. c~ o~t the concept of the tentative
~is b~i~ the t~e ~d place ~ ~verti~e~ ~che p~blic he~i~ ~
~'s. W~i~ A. Spies, Jr.~ ~nit~ ~viee~ that her prope~y is conti~ns to the
~e~ of ~he pro~se~ su~i~fmion ~ that she thins the p~ is a go~ one
op~sed, to the sir~e ~C the lots. ~s. Spice is protesti~ the ~ti~ of the
v~i~.!e ~ec~use ~1~ ~ez· the f~px~es~ion trot ChUm Vista, favors one acre
on the per~eter i~o act ~ ~ bt~f~ f~ the est~blis~e~ moni~ ~ (2~ ~ told that
these o~.er lots are the lea~t ~esirable in the ~ea ~ '~ill be sol~ che~per,~ so
~tur~' wi~[ be sol4 ~ ilevelop~ first. ~e c~ple~ of ~e~r ]~ ~11
the character of the
~', J~'bo, so~h of ~nlt~ S~:o~e, advised that ~s prope~y is also cont~o~ to the
~oposed subdivision ~d thi~s that 1/2 ~re shomid be the mbsvlute ~in~ for de-
velo~ent of this
!~. ~ce ~)~g~ A~en Sch~l ~a, was of the opinion that s~ of this ~d
shoed be re~e~ ~r the school exp~ion; this ia a d~er~,~s ~tersection
there :~s a ~cat de~!~.l of tr~ftc in the e~h~l ~ea. ~. M~b~g thins t~t
~cre lot~ sh~ld be ~he ~ in ord,r t~ ~ke the ~em c~p~tible.
~ere ~ei~ no i~her c~ment~ either for or ~nat, ~e he~Iv~ w~ dec~e~
Director of Plamui~g W~rren meliorated the f~c~ that the t~a %'a~ zo~e~ 1/2 ~?e
the Co'~%y ~d co~ h~ve been develope~ on ~hat ~is; ~he~ the 1~ ~$
it w~ ~ne~ one acta until such t~e ms a ~p ~s su~t'~ed which wo~d %~*
~age of the i~t~ topo~- of the l~n~. T~z pl~ c~es very close to ~he
density of one ~cre ~d the ~ev~o~ is t~i~ to m~In%ain the ~.t~
It ~ ~ that the wemter~ ~ier of !ot~ ~ be ~edezign~d to increase their
becmuse ~ey ~e ~J~ent ~ one~re ~c~e!~e~ lo~s i~ the ~y.
The C~is~ion ~moumsed ~ ~d fi~ing of ceftin lots on thra we~t,e~y
Of the su~ivislom m~Ad the D~ector of P~i~ noted that the City of Chc~a Vista
do.~m not ~ve m ~i~ or~n~ce ~t this time~ but this will co~e ~mud~r eonsid~ra~
tics on ~e fi~ ~o ~d they wi~ appr~e the concspt to ~e sur~ miz~
t~es plus. ~sist~t ~ineer Geal~ noted thmt, even witho~ gr~i~G~ th~
~ in this ~ea ~ not be ~s bad ~ im the pas~.
c~p:~nion thmt it i~ ~ wonder~, solution to the ~obl~ of d~velo~i~ thi~ ro~h
terr~n. Ne thins this is whmt the ~ita people h~ve b~n ~kt~ for; the o~y
~osmib!e ~ to develop the ~em is to have v~i~ size lots ~d. if that is e;~a~i~
hated, the ~ubdivi~er will ~ve to go back to one mere lots ~ divide th~ up
~t~o%~t which th~ ~it~ people do not ~-~t. ~ York noted that he is i~
m~% ~th F~. A~s ~ if the s~zb~vider ~s to ~z~intain one acre lots ~ he
~nt~n ~he bemuty of ~e hat,el
D~ector *f Pl~i~ W~en read ~ lettm~' ~ prote~t to the zone v~-i~ce ~ i~-
terested p~o~rty
M~ber G~r ia of the opinion t~/c this is a ~r~ble pl~ ~d ~ g~ ~ of
u~iliz~ the ~d. A ge~er~ ~cussion ~s held re~tiv~ to a mecond ~cess
the su~ivision west of ~en ~h~l bmr }~. W~en ~ of the ~inion that it doss
a.ppe~ to be legible.
Director W~en ~sed t~t the pe~le in this ~ea ~ve b~en contacted
to side--s ~t no rep~es ~ve b~n received ~ yet.
C~i~ 8te~ c~ed to the atte~tiom of the residents of the ~ea the
t~t ~h~ sm~l~d~ ~ pres~t~ a ~p to the P!m~iag C~szio~ ~hich ~
~ee~ed b~se of t~ pl~. He not~ t~t the ~m~io~ feel~ t~z ima g~
of the ~ ~d it ~es g~ ~e of t~ ~t~
~UC (G~-~ A~r~ of the request f~ r~uction of ~ea reQ~ont~ ~ith
the fo~A~ con~tiona:
1. ~t ~ fi~ ~p is rec~d~ w~ch ~ ca~ ~t the co~ept of
~ pr~osed in the tentative ~p of ~nita Tierra ~b~vision, ~t
~n~tive cont~lmtes averse lot size of 41~000 sq~e ~et c~c~ated o~ a
~oss density b~is.
2. ~at ~ att~pt be ~ to ~t the desi~ of the ~ester~ e~e of the subdi-
vision to incre~e the ~ea of lots 18 - 22.
a. That the sta. iet ,~pplic~tio~ of the zoni~ re~l~tion~ ~ requ~ents w~u!d re~
s~t iz~ p~rticut~ d~ffic~ti~$ ~r ~ec~sa~ ~dmhip~ inconsistent with the
g~n~r~ purpose ~ t~tenb of the
The severity cf '~h~ t~p~pky on ~uch of the prope~y m~e~ it nece~
to d~veto~ the n~re ~'~i ~cms at a ~eater d~ensity th~ the stee~r por-
tions to get ~ r~on~b!e yield. ~ae oYer~ density is ~e~ one
b~ That there ~e e~c~ption~ tire,states or ,o~tions applicmble to the
erty in',olved or to ~h~ i~tended ~e or d~el~ent of the property that do ~ot ~pp3y
gen*r~ ~o other proper~vf in th~ ~e zoBe or meigh~rh~.
Special c~mide~atios~ sho~.d be ~e conc~ni~ this pr~erty since,
mt th~ t~e it ~ ~nen~d, it box'e the Co~ty ~-m~re cl~sificstio~
but ~ms p;~ezen.ed for one tcr~ lots ~ a preca~tion ~t exce~$ive
gj~r~. ~e applicaut h~ demon~trmted thmt excemsive ~i~ will not
oc*~' ~d has le~ th~ d~n~lty at ne~ eo~ ~cre.
~e or i~io~ t~ pr~i:e~cY or ~rov~nts in ~uch zone or ::eigh~rh~d
which the prope~.~y i~
Thi~ ~ub~vl~to~ pr~ides its o'~ nmt~ork of s~re~ts emd the lots
or:%~ted to-~d ~he tra~t~ interle:~ ~ with the exception of th~
no~th~st po~to~, s~are~ no l~u~les ~ith d~vel~md ~d.
d~ '~ the grs.nti~E of a ~'~iauce ~fll not be contr~ to the objectives of the
Th~: ~oi~o~, Is subst~timTly lu co~o~nc~ ~th the ~ner~ PI~.
D~ector of P~in~ ~ zu~tted ~ plot pl~ of the propez~y which t~ Io~ted
~ t~ e~t side of Jeffers~ Avenue bet~en E Street ~d Sierra W~. He advised
t~t the fo~,~r o~r h~. s~c~d a b~ldi~ pe~it i~ 1964 to cc.nvs~ the g~ge
for r~sidenti~ p~oses with the stip~ti~ thmt he ~ld ~so cos~t~ct a c~r-
po~ i~ ~e~t of the ho~e to ?~he n~%h of the fo~m~ g~e; the co~%¥ersion of the
~;o ~ proper'by ~d the neighbc~-h~-~d~ F.H.A~ wc~d like ~he ~one vea~isn~e in order
~l~ed closed.
~i,~ber ~'de noted that I$ ~o~d be ~ i~o~ition t¢ Insight that the bui]ding be
~:tored to its ~gig!=~ state e~d t~e ee~po~ wcu~d not be m~J:ory;, b~ feelm
would be the be~t and mo~t logie~ solution to the probt~ at this
up to the a~t~:~dm of the ~ildi~
Yindi~:~s be ~
~. ~t the strict ~g!e~tio~ of the zont~ re~tion;-~ or reQ~.~.r~ents won!d
~ult in p~tieu].~r ~fficmltie:~ o~' '~,~e~ess~-y hsr~shlp~ Ineonslste~t ~,ith th~
gener~J~ 9ux~e ~ intent of the
~m~d be ~,o?e ~f ~ dat~Lm~nt to the p~ropez,ty ~d the neighb~rh~d t~ i~
lega~, the stc~tu~ of t:~'o i~ ~-mo'~:, and the other i~ the s~bJect ?'operbF,,
b. That th,~r~ ~re e~cepticr,~ clrc~;v~t~uees or cezditions e~pl: e~ble to the
erty invol~d !~r t~ the in-:ended u~e or deveioI~eng of the preperty t~ do
:~op~v Eenerally to other property in thc s~,e zone or nei~bo~h~c~d.
A':; this iwgn% ~ it wc~zld be i~ea~Lble to r~ov~ the :'.~prc~'m~e~cs
const~cted o~' to build mu aw~d ~d ~sthet~c~:d.ly disple:~sir~ e~ort.
c. ~'~,% the gra~+dng of s. verb. ante will not b~ mat*rially detrtx~ental to the pub~ic
w~lf~'e or injurio~ to ~rop~rty or improve~ents in such zone or neighborho~ in
which the property ~ loc~ted~
Th:~re ~re fi~ ~ther houses in t~e 800 block of Jaffe~son Av~mue
~[h~ch h~v~ ~t~.lsm~ly con~erted garages without ~ho provision of
d. Th~:t the gr~blzg of m vsri~ce will not be con~r~m~ ~;o the objectives oi the
Th~ Gener~ P!~.~, z-o~.d ncr b~ ~'fect~d by the appr~al of thi~ request,
PUBLEC .~A~;E~[G: VA~L~NCE - Eavi~ Boom,s - Noriheast Corner of F~st Avenue
~ Str~'et - Red, est for Reduction i~ Fron~ Y~d Setback
2~; to 20'
T~ ~,~p?&ice,tlon was r~ in ~hich a request wa~ ~d~: for reduction in ~¥ont 2~rd
setbac~ i~'om 25~ ~o 20' ~.t the r.or':;heast corner of First Avenue ~d P~'~itney
Dl:,'~ct'~r of Ptaz~i~ ¥~u-en subm!t%:~d m plot p].~m si,owing the zooming ~d adJseent
1~ ~ ~nd lsd. leather.: ~% th~.~ setback m~ea which takes ~p 2/~ of th~ lot. Mr
W~?en aotcd t~t the propos~=d si~g[L~-f~i]y d~elli~E would use First Avenue
its ~"~ut enthrones ~. ~ti[;uey Street ~ the g~'~ge entra~ce but, for y~r~
~d~::d ~.~e~ the ets. fl hms red'sired n~rmerous inquirie~: conc~rni~ building on tt.io
p~e~ ~.z ti~e pa~t ~u~ in e~-h e~s% plan~ hav~ ~n ~bandoned because of tls
e~ees~-~'~ ~e~:b~.ck~ ~n th~ ~rcpe~'ty~ th~ staff ha~ r~:eo~e~d~d ~}?~?ov~L of th~ re-.
Tt:~.~ b~Ir~ the ttn~ ~:d Dlac~ as ~v~tis~d, the p~t,lic h~ing ~
M~~. D~./id ~o~uds, the applicsn~;, stated that he had nothl~ ~rther to ~d
clerked closed,
t~ 20~' for prcpe~'ty lc~ato'l c,n the ~,rtheast corner of First Avenu~ ~ud
a. Th~'b the strict application of the zoning ~g~l~tions or re~.~ir~ente
~ t~t iu p~,rtic~lar difficulti~ or ~u~necsss~ h~,dshlps in~onsl~t~:~t ~ith
geney~L p~pose ~d i~te~t of the
In order to ~void using ~Ir~t Avenue, ~ hemvi~ trav~lled street, ~
ac~:esm to the g~e~ the fl~r pl~ had to b~ ~r~d such tb~t the
~iving ~ea ie oriented ~o the ~st ~ide of the houze, ~d thus the
~io ~-ould ~so have to b~ located on the east side. Withov$ a 5
reimction, th~ pmtio co~d on].y be 6' in ~ldth.
bo T:~,t there ~re ezee~,t~on,~,l c:~rcumi)bances or ~,o~ditions applicable to the prop-
erty nvolved or t~ the i~t~ded use or de~elo~,ent of ~e property that do not
~p?y general)y to othe~ proper~y in the same zone or ne~,ghborh~.
D~.,ause of the setback r~Qu!rements on this pereel~ 2/S of the lot
d ~-oted to seths, ck~ m~i~g t)~e p~cel difficult to develop without
~.~e s~tb~ck red~tSon~
e. T~t the ~ant~ of a v~'i~ee will not be ~ateri~ly detr~ente~ tc th~ I~ublic
-~f~ or inJ~io,~s to prop~rty or ~loro~ eme~ts in such zone or neighborh~i
which the property i~
N~'~ detriment Is evident. Apprc?mal of thi~ request ~d.ows the
~!~u~in~ti~ ~ potential traffic ~.z~rd~
d. T~t the gr~u~ing oi~ a v~i~uce will not be ~o~tr~y t~) the objectives o~ the
T~e G~ner~l PIe~ wo~!d n~t be ~fected b)~ ~hic propo~al~
}?~;~L~ ~[~L~BING: ',(~R2'ANCE - ~tch~rd Wil;~on - 2~9 ~E Street - ~st for R-3 ~o,d
Use in R~ Zone ~d ~educt[on i~ ~r_~tba~k from~5~o
~ ?lzc~tzon ~a~ re~ iu ~hieh ~ request ~s~s ~de for R-3 and 0-2~ u~ In
zone ~d r~duetion in ~o~t setback from 25' tc~
Di~c~r of Plying Waw-ren ~u~itted a plot ~1~ noting the lceati~ oi the
~.~et ~ the zoni~; end ~Jaeeat l~d mze. Mr~ P~'reu ~tated that the ap~.liea~t
i?e~e~, to replace ~,n ~xisting business office with a ~e*~ office bt~ilding ~d
~;~o,-~s',;ory townhouse ap~tment ~uits in the resx of the p~'cperty which, is zoned
vhe e:tisting office is a eonve~ted s~le-f~ dwelli~ permitted by e.
gr~t~d in 1956~ [u:,d noted t~t ~ple pu%vking wiJ~ be provided ~d the ~ropa~ty ~i~.~
be ~dsemped, D.c~ss to '~:.h~ parkin~ ~'ea wi33,, be by us~ of ~ eas~.en'b bet:-ree~
.... ~..~eka ~o~. the property in question,
~* ~f~iic~t is b2~ h'A~ ~:~:~tb~ek reduction recf~est o~ the presence ol the
~etb~,~k on the ~b~tti~g prop ~rty to the ~est ~tieh is zoned C-1 ~d ~proved ~th
~n of:~iee building. In ~us~:~r to ~ inqui~ from M~0~ Ste~t, Mr. Werren o~'ted
~t ~;he property ~n q3~erst~.o~ exte~ds alo~ CO~m~rci~ use pr~erty for a d~ta~ee
~f l~?. The m~pplie~t is b~.~ing his use req~est cn the prob~oility of ~tu~e
~]a~ ~tc~tion foz~ thepx~op~rby ~on ~option of the new~ zoni~ ordinance.
~e~ nc~t~d that~ even thc,~h the ~ ~ ' do~s not v~'~t to ~ise ~s ~. ~inanee
~;h~;t :s ~ob ~opt~, ~,h~ st~ff ~ees ~hat gha most logic~ ~one for th~s pa~c~l
~o~Od be the C~,O cl~smi~.catic,n, which ,~r~uld petit multiple u~ of pro~ty~ b~t
si~c~ tP~$ zon~ ~o~].d r~im~,r:o ~ ].0~ ~tb~ck, the staff c(:mnot support a r~du~t!cn
to le~s th~ 10'. Th~ ~t,,~f~ ,~" reco~e~s apprc:v'e~ of this request with
This bei~ the tSme ~d plac~ ~s ad.vartised~ the p~blic he~ing was op~nad.
t~bio ~gd ~O~l - a di~t~, ge of )2~8"~ He noted uh~t thi~i ~o~d ~ontl~ue a~ ~ f~n~e
snd t!.?~e w~ld b~ ~ ~ ~dgh k~'iek ~'~1 fenice bet~>/m th~ p~tio u.nd the
Yrelez~ka ~g~nor g:~d ~he property in question b~ n~ed for p~king~ trash
et~. ~ ~ud~ ~.:? i~', i~ u~ed for a~cess for the al~ar"~e~t~~ it woul~l cre&~e m traff!-
l~z~r~; '~, d~tr~tt ~l '~o the sgfe%y of the ~re,~ %~,~ ~ove the building cl~me~~ t~
th~= p~'cp~:~r~y llne~ ~i ~?~ tlc prox!~ty of th~ ~r!~'~uen~ to the other hous~" in
p ......... ~ of the ct ..... ~:~den,~s of ~h~
I,i~u:~sio~ ~ held rela:;!ve ~3 i;h~ ~'ea whic~, w:u!4 be i~elu~.ed in t:~e
~r. ~:~J~.eI~ 229 T~in :3e~.: Cirele~ spe~i~ on be.:a!~ ~f the residents l"ong
~aks $irele~ is p~o';e~t~: the v~:cig~'~ce ~d s.ddet t~at~ s~ver~l ye~s ~io,
%acte~5 the Pl~i=g ~p~::'tment ~,d '~s informed 'thg: it ~as not in the pl~ :,o
~'h:~.ag~ the zone of hi3
~'. T. D Bullook, 24~ ~ Str~et~ pre)tests the ¥~ri~.~ee d.~:~ to the trs~ffJ,c
~?~::":cr of Pl~nl~$ W~:/en queried ~:T~t ~e ~t :~ mpp~opriat~ for
~.'~ p~opeyty at the r,~v of an offi<~ ~d ~Lth ~onS~e on ~ eas~e::~ ~e'~f.~
(:hai~a:~ Ste~-~t r_o~e~ ~t the applicant h~ ~ :~ea~ pyobt,~ - the !~nd in the reur
There b~in~ no ~r~her ~.~r:;~ eithor for or ~a~:~st~ the p~lic he~!ng
the d e~J,:~ng f~>' office
M~be~: Gr~gzcn ~t~-,t~ t~:%t this ~.~ thi~ ~i been att~:p'::,ed i= this n~;~ighb,~rhoc~.
~:d h~ did not thi~i~ it ':,r~s de~irs.bte here.
~:e~b~, Yo::h ind.iaat~d that there wa~ no other ~se f~r tt::is property and that scm~-
~.here muttip!e-f~ri~ uc~e is goiug to occ~ between c~rci~l ~d ~inEie-.f~ity
d~e~ ~:, feel it is f~ir to the other' prope~'ty ~nex's to eh,~e the i~en~ftu
u~e - if it h~E bee:~ ~h~:~ed bef~>re they built t~eir homes~ it wo~ld b~ a di:Tfer~nt
~t~.~:r ~,d th~* wo~t.d hc:~-e ~:~o c~f.l~i~.t; this zone ch~e n~~* ce~$~ a deere~e
I?'r. %~lson noted bh~b h~ do~:~; not w~ ~o h~ve probl~ with h~s n~Igh'b~r~ ~d
~.~',y. He inquir~ Lf th~ 1S~ re~ ~etb~k comId be reduced to a]osorb the
t?.ongO. 8' required Ln th~ J~'~nt. ~h'. W~rr~n noted that he did not thi~ the
Attor~ey w~uld advi~e ce;~sideri~; thi,~ '~ithout public notice.
Chai~e~n Ste~rt ~on~.,n~d that th~'~ t~ope~;y im not suitable ~or R-1 us,~ ~ that
~:~,ter sh~l be r~ferred to the Pl~ning
It i~ re~:;,~!~ to 0:%~,e,~% theft th~ ~ubJeet pre~e~r~y will be reo~stfiel