Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/1991/01/23 AGENDA City Planning Commission Chula Vista, California Wednesday, January 23, 1991 - 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INTRODUCTORY REMARKS APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Meeting of November 13, 1990 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Opportunity for members of the public to speak to the Planning Commission on any subject matter within the Commission's jurisdiction but not an item on today's agenda. Each speaker's presentation may not exceed five minutes. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit PCC-91-09; Request to redevelop service station and add mini-market and car wash at 765 'E' Street - Mobile Oil Corporation 2. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit PCC-91-23; Request to construct a Brunswick Recreational Center at 845 Lazo Court within the Rancho del Rey Business Center - Leiserv, Inc. OTHER BUSINESS DIRECTOR'S REPORT COMMISSION COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT AT p.m. to the Regular Business Meeting of February 13, 1991 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of January 23, 1991 Page 1 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit PCC-91-09; Request to redevelop service station and add mini-market and car wash at 765 "E" Street - Mobil Oil Corporation A. BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting permission to redevelop and upgrade an existing service station site into a 24-hour self-service gas facility with mini-market and car wash at 765 "E" Street in the C-V-P zone. The property is located approximately 100 feet east of the northeast corner of the I-5 and "E" Street interchange. The Environmental Review Coordinator has conducted an Initial Study, IS-91-03, of potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the project. Based on the attached Initial Study and comments thereon, the Coordinator has concluded that although there is the potential for significant environmental impacts, there will not be a significant effect due to mitigation measures imposed upon the project. The ERC recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on IS-91-03. B. RECOMMENDATION 1. Based on the Initial Study and comments on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration, find that this project will have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on IS-91-03. 2. Based on the findings contained in Section "E" of this report, adopt a motion to approve the request, PCC-91-09, subject to the following conditions: a. The proposal shall comply with the plan approved or conditionally approved by the Design Review Committee (DRC-91-13). b. The hours of operation of the car wash facility shall be limited to between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. without the prior written permission of the Zoning Administrator. C. DISCUSSION Adjacent zoninq and land use North - CVP Motel South - CVP Trolley Station East - CVP Drive-thru Restaurant West - CVP Trolley tracks and I-5 Freeway City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of January 23, 1991 Page 2 Existinq site characteristics The project site measures 178 ft. x 200 ft. (0.82 acres} and is located approximately 100 feet east of the northeast corner of the I-5 and "E" Street interchange. The property presently contains a 3,500 sq. ft. service building in the middle portion of the site and two pump islands under a single canopy oriented parallel to "E" Street. Proposed use The applicant proposes to redevelop the site with a 924 sq. ft. mini-market in conjunction with a 3-dispenser island and overhead canopy structure oriented perpendicular to the street. An automatic self-serve carwash is proposed to be located in the northeast corner of the property. Substantial landscaping will be provided adjacent to "E" Street and around the perimeter of the site. Access will be provided via two driveways along the "E" Street frontage. The proposal also includes a 70 sq. ft., six ft.-high monument sign to be located on the southeast corner of the lot and a freestanding price sign to be located on the southwest corner of the lot. Both signs will be constructed and placed perpendicular to the south property line and oriented in such a manner as to maximize their exposure to "E" Street. D. ANALYSIS When the property was rezoned to C-V-P in lg75 [PCZ-75-F{4)], the precise plan modifying district established a guideline which encouraged the use of joint driveways and coordination of on-site circulation with adjacent uses. Although existing development of adjacent properties does not provide for joint access, the future street widening and the construction of a raised median on "E" Street will contribute to an increase in traffic safety and improved traffic flow. In this regard, the developer will be required to dedicate 16 feet along the entire length of the south property line for future street widening and will be liable for one-half of the costs relating to the construction of a 16 foot wide raised median along the centerline of "E" Street. On-site circulation will be much improved with the provision of additional islands and greater stacking capacity. The applicant has provided staff with information relating to the noise levels expected to be produced by the car wash equipment. This information indicates that the noise levels could exceed the the City's standards if it were in operation during late evening and early morning hours. Therefore, a condition has been recommended which would limit the hours of operation of the car wash to between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. If later testing indicates the facility can operate within the City's standards, the Zoning Administrator could authorize an extension of the hours of operation. City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of January 23, 1991 Page 3 The Design Review Committee will consider the project on January 14, 1991. Their action will be reported to the Commission at the public hearing. The following comments have been submitted by the Engineering and Fire Departments: 1. Sewer, traffic signal fees will be assessed when the building permit is issued. 2. A construction permit for work performed in the street right of way. 3. Public improvements including, but not limited to: a. A.C. paving and base to provide 44 feet from centerline to face of curb. b. New curb, gutter, 8 foot sidewalk and new driveway approach. c. One-half of a 16 foot wide raised concrete median (to be deferred). d. Relocation of street light standard. 4. Sixteen foot street dedication will be required. 5. Walk-in cooler shall comply with Section 1712, U.B.C. 6. Proposed facility must comply with Article 79, Uniform Fire Code. 7. A permit is required from the Fire Department for any installation or removal of underground tanks or repiping of product lines, etc. E. FINDINGS 1. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the community. The proposed self-serve gas, mini-market and car wash facility will serve the needs of the residents in the surrounding area as well as visitors and other freeway motorists by providing an easily accessible facility in close proximity to the I-5 northbound and southbound interchange. 2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of January 23, 1991 Page 4 The proposal will upgrade the site and will reduce potential traffic conflicts on "E" Street. The proposal will comply with the City's noise standards. 3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified in the code for such use. The proposed project shall be required to comply with all applicable codes, conditions and regulations prior to issuance of development permits. 4. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely affect the general plan of the City or the adopted plan of any government agency. The issuance of this permit as conditioned by staff assures consistency with the General Plan by permitting the redevelopment and upgrading of the existing facility in a fashion which will not adversely impact adjoining areas. WPC 8705P [PROJECT AREA~ i I J L.__ 4 ® , I I-5 FREEWAY I vo 'V/SIA ¥"lflHO J ',kM:l 0931a N¥S J ~ i33~i$ ,,3,, - I ...... -IISOl,N negati a declaration- PROJECT NAME: Mobil Oil Corporation PROJECT LOCATION: 765 "E" Street PROJECT APPLICANT: Mobil Oil Corporati~ c/o Tait & Associates 3675 Ruffin Rd. San Diego, CA 92123 CASE NO: IS-9]-03 DATE: December 28, 1990 A. Project Setting The project'site is presently developed as an existing 3,500 sq. ft. Mobil Oil gas station with two pump islands on a 35,600 square foot lot. The service station building occupies the central portion of the site. Access to the site is from two existing curb cuts along the "E" Street frontage. The site is already graded and developed with~the existing gas station use and does not contain any sensitive or endangered species of flora or fauna. Surrounding land uses include McDonald's Restaurant to the east, Interstate 5 and the MTDB Trolley Right-of-Way to the west, Motel 6 to the north, and "E" Street and the MTDB Trolley Station to the south. The site is at an approximate elevation of 40 feet Above Mean Seal Level (AMSL) and is underlain by fill and alluvial soils. There are no known faults transecting the site and the nearest major active fault is the Coronado Banks Fault which is approximately 10 miles to the southwest. B. Project Desc~,iption The proposed project consists o6 the demolition of the existing Mobil Oil Gas Station and the construction of 12 new fueling stations with canopies, a "mini-mart", and an automated car wash facility. The remainder of the site will be surfaced with asphalt and site landscaping. The required discretionary actions include a conditional use permit and design review application. The proposed facility would consist of a 924 square foot mini-mart, a 648 square foot car wash, and an approximately 4,556 square foot gas station facility. A 70 sq. ft. monument sign approximately six feet high would be located at the southeast corner of the lot, as well as a freestanding price sign located or~-he southwest corner of the lot. city of chula vista pl.anning department CI~'OF environmental review section CHULAVISTA -2- C. Compatibility with Zoninq and Plans The proposed project requires a conditional use permit to ensure compatibility with the CVP~Commercial Visitor {Precise Plan} zoning designation. The proposed project will be compatible with the "Thoroughfare Commercial" general plan designation, which allows automobile-related commercial uses. With compliance to the conditions of project approval, the proposed use will be consistent with the land use designations on site. In addition to City of Chula Vista approvals, the applicant must comply with the County of San Diego's Hazardous Materials Management Division and the Regional Water Quality Board requirements concerning the remediation of four leaking underground storage tanks which were removed on October of 1987. The on-site hazardous waste problem has been acknowledged by the State of California Office of Planning and Research {OPR) "Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List" November 1990. This list is compiled by the State Water Resources Control Board for all underground storage tanks for which an unauthorized release report is filed pursuant to Section 25295 of the Health & Safety Code. Further discussion of on-site hazardous waste impacts can be found in Section F of this document. D. Compliance with the Threshold/Standards Policy 1. Fire/EMS The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The estimated response time is 5 minutes, and the nearest fire station is approximately 7/8 of a mile away. The proposed project is in compliance with this threshold standard, and the Fire Department has indicated that there is adequate fire flow to service the site. 2. Police The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to Priority 1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The Police Department has been contacted and they have indicated that the proposed project is in conformance with this threshold standard. 3. Traffic The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service {LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service {LOS} "D" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of 1-805 -3- are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this policy. The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the .primary access roads are adequate to serve the project. Mitigati'on of traffic impacts will be discussed in Section H of this document and in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 4. Parks/Recreation The Threshold/Standards Policy for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/I,000 population. This threshold standard applies only to residential projects, therefore, the proposed commercial project is exempt from the threshold standard for Parks and Recreation. 5. Drainage The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that storm water flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering Standards. The proposed project is located on an existing, developed site with adequate drainage infrastructure, according to the Engineering Department. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. 6. Sewer Review of the specific development proposals by the City will ensure that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City engineering standards. The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed project and has indicated that the existing 8" sewer line in "E" Street connecting to a 10" sewer pipe in Woodlawn Avenue is adequate to serve the proposed projecb. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. 7. Water The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The Sweetwater Authority has been contacted and has indicated that water service is available, therefore, the project meets this threshold standard. E. Identification of Environmental Effects An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista determined that the proposed project may result in significant, adverse environmental effects. Mitigation measures have been required to reduce potentially significant environmental effects to a level of less than significant. Specific project mitigation has been required for visual, noise, risk of upset and traffic/circulation impacts. Air quality impacts are deemed to be less than significant, therefore no mitigation is deemed necessary. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been issued in accordance with Section 15070 of CEQA. -4- F. Impacts Deemed Potentially Siqnificant 1. Visual Impacts The proposed project is located in a highly visible portion of the City, which can be considere~ a gateway to Chula Vista. Gateways are generally areas that constitute a major approach to the City that extend for some distance and may require some type of special treatment. "E" Street from I-5 to the urban core of Chula Vista is designated as an "Urban Core Gateway". Views to the project site occur from "E" Street, Interstate 5, and Marina Parkway. Marina Parkway is a designated scenic roadway on the City's General Plan. Due to the high visibility of the proposed project and its location in an "urban core gateway" of the City, visual impacts are deemed to be potentially significant. Mitigation measures will be required for the project to ensure visual quality and to reduce visual impacts to a level of less than significant. Mitigation measures are discussed in Section H of this document and in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Addendum "A"). 2. Noise Impacts The project site lies immediately east of the MTDB Trolley line, as well as Interstate 5. Ambient noise levels from these adjacent uses will not be considered a significant adverse impact upon the proposed commercial project. However, noise generated from the proposed project is considered potentially significant in conjunction with the proposed carwash. Potentially significant noise impacts are of particular concern due to th~ proximity of the proposed carwash to the motel use to the north. An acoustical analysis (Gordon Ricker & Associates, April 24, 1989) was submitted to provide representative noise levels generated from a similar car wash use in the City of San Diego. As indicated in the noise study, 76 dBA was projected as the full hour Leq, or noise equivalent level from the car wash activities. The Chula Vista Noise Ordinance specifies that for commercial land uses, the performance standards are 65 dBA 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. weekdays and 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. weekends; and 60 dBA 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. weekdays and 10 p.m. to 8 a.m. weekends. The proposed project, therefore, has the potential for significant noise impacts to the adjacent motel use and will require mitigation to reduce noise impacts to a level of less than significant and to comply with the noise ordinance standards. Partial mitigation of noise impacts will be provided by the 24 foot setback of the carwash from the northern Mobil property line, as well as, the 130 foot further separation from the northern property line to the motel use. This provides a 154 foot setback from the car wash to the motel, creating a substantial distance for noise impact minimization. Noise mitigation is discussed more fully in Section H and in the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program (Addendum "A"). -5- 3. Risk of Upset The proposed renovation of the existing Mobil 0il station will require the addition of two underground petroleum tanks on site. The existing use is listed on the. Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List (November ]990) as containing an existing leaking underground storage tank on site. The project is associated with potential hazardous waste impacts associated with a past problem with four leaking underground storage tanks, which caused a release of fuel hydrocarbons and other hazardous substances on site. This creates the potential for risk of upset impacts which are particularly significant during a period of upset conditions. Thus, the proposed project is associated with potentially significant "risk of upset" impacts. So far, studies of the contamination on site have revealed relatively low concentrations of xylenes (500 ppb), toluene (500 ppb); and ethyl benzene (]00 ppb). No chlorinated hydrocarbons, benzene or organic lead traces have been found in quantities which would indicate a significant contamination problem, according to Don Lipera of the County Hazardous Materials Management Division (HMMD). On October 6, 1987, the applicant removed three fuel tanks and one waste oil tank. Soil was excavated and new soil was brought on site to further mitigate hazardous waste impacts. The contaminated soil from the site was taken to a Class III Landfill. The County required the applicant to perform a series of borings to verify, after the tank removal, whether contamination had spread elsewhere on the site. As of the date of preparation of this docume~t, the County indicated they did not believe there was a problem remaining on site, but was leaving the final determination up to the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Due to the potential for risk of upset impacts, therefore, associated with the past release of hazardous substances on site, the applicant will be required to comply with the County HMMD and Regional Water Quality Board standards for remediating any remaining hazardous waste problems on site. These standards have been included as project mitigation in Section "H" of this document and in the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program {Addendum "A"}. 4. Traffic/Circulation The project site abuts "E" Street, which is designated as a "Major Street" on the Circulation Element of the General Plan. As a result of a preliminary assessment by the Chula Vista Engineering Department, it has been determined that the proposed project would not adversely impact the Level of Service {LOS} on adjacent roadways. -6- The Engineering Department has indicated that the current LOS on "E" Street is 29,040 Average Daily Trips {ADT). With the proposed project, the LOS on "E" Street is estimated at 30,740 ADT. The proposed project will generate approximately 1,650 ADT, with approximately 900 ADT genera~ex~ by the car wash and 750 ADT from the gas station/mini-mart. Street widening will be required by the City Engineering Department to a width of 12 feet along the "E" Street frontage in order to comply with major street improvement requirements of 52 feet from centerline on "E" Street, and this requirement will be made a condition of project approval. G. Imoacts Deemed to be Less than Siqnificant 1. Air Quality The project is located immediately east of Interstate 5 and the MTDB Right-of-Way for the trolley. Interstate 5 represents a significant source of carbon monoxide emissions in the project vicinity. However, the proposed commercial land use is not considered to be a sensitive receptor to air emissions. The proposed project will generate approximately 1,650 ADT which will not significantly impact the Level of Service along "E" Street. The project will not create a significant air quality impact, since the level of service on adjacent roadways will not be adversely impacted and the project will not generate a substantial increase in traffic volumes and, therefore, air emissions. No air quality mitigation will be required for the proposed project since air quality impacts are deemed to be less than significant. H. Mitiqation Necessary to Avoid Siqnificant Effects Specific project mitigation has been required to reduce potentially significant visual, noise, traffic/circulation, and risk of upset impacts to a level of less than significant. Project related impacts that are deemed to be less than significant include air quality impacts. These impacts will not require mitigation measures since they are already deemed to be below a level of significance. 1. Visual Mitiqation The proposed project is associated with potentially significant visual impacts due to its highly visible location adjacent to Interstate 5 and in a major gateway to the City. To reduce visual impacts to a level of less than significant, the following mitigation measures will be required: a. Project design shall conform to the specific requirements set forth by the Design Review Committee: -7- 2. Noise Mitiqation The proposed project is associated with potentially significant noise impacts due to the proximity of the proposed car wash to the motel to the north. To reduce noise impacts to a level of less than significant, the following mitigation measure will be required: a. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours of 8 a.m. to lO p.m. daily. 3. Traffic/Circulation Mitiqation The proposed project is associated with potentially significant traffic/circulation impacts. To reduce traffic/circulation impacts to a level of less than significant, the following mitigation measures will be required: a. Street widening along the "E" Street frontage will be required to accommodate a four lane major street section. This will entail widening "E" Street by 12 feet for a width of 52 feet from center line to property line. 4. Risk of Upset Mitiqation The proposed project is associated with potentially significant risk of upset impacts. To reduce risk of upset impacts to a level of less than significant, the following mitigation measure will be required: a. The recommended mitigation measures set forth by the County of San Diego Hazardous Materials Management Division and Regional Water Quality Control Board shall be complied with, prior to the issuance of building permits. I. Findinqs of Less than Siqnificant Impact A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared pursuant to Section 15070 of the State CEQA guidelines and the following findings have been made. Based on the following findings, it is determined that although the project described above could have a significant environmental impact, no environmental impact report will be required because specific visual, noise, risk of upset, and traffic/circulation mitigation has been included in the project design. Through the provision of mitigation measures, potentially significant environmental impacts have been reduced to a level of less than significant. 1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. -8- Although, the proposed project would have a significant adverse effect upon the quality of the natural environment, it will not have a significant effect because specific mitigation measures have been required to reduce potential impacts to a level of less than significant. The project conditions will ensure that any potentially adverse impacts will be reduced to a level of less than significant. Mitigation of potentially significant impacts are set forth in Section H of this document and in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 2. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. The project is consistent with the General Plan and zoning designation. The project will not achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-term goals because these long-term goals would be achieved through compliance with City threshold standards, site preparation standards and specific mitigation measures set forth in Section H of this document and in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 3. The project has possible effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, "cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Although the proposed project would create cumulative impacts, such as temporary noise and traffic impacts during construction, these impacts are short-term and temporary and are not considered to be significant. Impacts to the surrounding community will be incremental and the improvements will not cause significant growth in the surrounding community. There are no significant growth inducement nor cumulative impacts associated with the proposed project. The project will comply with City standards and is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The initial study identified the potential for hazardous waste impacts on the property. The proposed project previously had four leaking underground storage tanks on site, however, they have been removed. The applicant will be required to comply with the County Hazardous Materials Management Division and Regional Water Quality Control Board standards regarding hazardous waste/risk of upset impacts. There will be temporary noise impacts associated with the construction phase of the project, but these will be short-term only. With compliance with the required Mitigation Measures and conditions of project approval, the project will not cause any substantial adverse impacts to human beings. -9- H. Consultation 1. Individuals and Orqanizations City of Chula Vista: Maryann M~ller, Environmental Review Coordinator Phil Landowski, Chula Vista Fire Department M. J. Donnelly, Engineering Department Eugenia A. Franco, Engineering Department Samir Nuhaily, Engineering Department Carol Gove, Fire Marshal Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department Ed Batchelder, Planning Department Shauna Stokes, Parks and Recreation Sweetwater High School District: Thomas Silva Applicant's Agent: Mark Hayden Tait & Associates 3675 Ruffin Rd. San Diego, CA 92123 2. Documents Chula Vista General Plan Chula Vista Municipal Code Geotechnical Investigation, Mobil Service Station, Owen Consultants, September 22, 1988 This environmental determination concludes that the project will not have any significant environmental impacts, based upon the attached Initial Study, a field check ~ the site, and any public comments received. Further information regarding the environmental review of the project is available from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR EN 6 (Rev. 3/88} WPC 8785P ADDENDUM "A" Mitiqation Monitorinq Proqram Mobil Oil Station Expansion IS-9~-03 This Mitigation Monitoring Program is prepared for the Mobil Oil Station expansion project, in order to comply with AB 3180. This legislation requires public agencies to ensure that adequate mitigation measures are implemented and monitored on mitigated negative declarations, such as IS-91-03. AB 3180 requires monitoring of potentially significant and/or significant environmental impacts. The mitigation monitoring program for the Mobil Oil Station Expansion ensures adequate implementation of mitigation for the following potentially significant impacts: Visual Noise Traffic Impacts Due to the nature of the environmental issues identified, the Mitigation Compliance Coordinator (MCC) shall be the Environmental Review Coordinator (£RC) for the City of Chula Vista. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the conditions of the Mitigation Monitoring Program and met to the satisfaction of the ERC. Visual Mitiqation The following project specific visual mitigation will be required for the proposed project, in order reduce potentially significant aesthetic impacts to a level of less than significant. These mitigation measures will be made conditions of p~ject approval: 1. Project design shall conform to the specific requirements set forth by the Design Review Committee: Noise Mitiqation The following project specific noise mitigation will be required for the proposed project, in order to reduce potentially significant noise impacts to a level of less than significant. These mitigation measures will be made conditions of project approval: 1. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours of 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily. Traffic Mitiqation The following specific traffic mitigation will be required for the proposed project, in order to reduce potentially significant traffic impacts to a level of less than significant. These mitigation measures will be made conditions of project approval: o. 1. Street widening along the "E" Street frontage will be required to accommodate a four lane major street section. This will entail widening "E" Street by 12 feet for a width of 52 feet from center line to property line. Risk of Upset/Hazardous Waste Mitiqation 1. The recommended mitigation measures set forth by the County of San Diego Hazardous Materials Management Division and Regional Water Quality Control Board shall be complied with, prior to the issuance of building permits. WPC 8793P FOR OFFICE Case No. /~- INITIAL STUDY Receipt No. Date Rec'd City of Chula Vista Accepted bye. Application Form Project No. A. BACKGROUND · ' 1. PROJECT TITLE MOBIL OIL CORPORATION 2. PROJECT LOCATION (Street address or description) NEC 765 "E" ST~-~' & I-5t CHULA VISTAr CA Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. 565-310-16 3. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION REBUILD ]EXIS~fl-NG ~ & 3 BAY SI~RV-ICE FACILITY TO C_JNSf M_I-NI-IvIART AND CARNASH FACILI?Y. 4. Name of Applicant MOBIL OIL CORPORATION Address 3142 VISTA WAY, $'1~. 400 Phone (619) 439-5061 City OCEANSIDE State CA Zip 92056 5. Name of Preparer/Agent TAIT & ASSOCIATES Address 3675 RUFFIN RD. Phone (619) 278-1161 City SANDIEGO State CALIFORNIA Zip 92123 Relation to Applicant AGI~ 6. Indicgte all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents required by the Environmental Review Coordinator. a. Permits or approvals required: General Plan Revision XDesign Review Committee Public Project Rezoning/Prezoning Tentative Subd. Map --Annexation Precise Plan Grading Permit Design Review Board Specific Plan Tentative Parcel Map -- Redevelopment Agency x Cond. Use Permit Site Plan & Arch. Review Variance Other b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Coordinator). Location Map Arch. Elevations Eng. Geology Report Grading Plan __ Landscape Plans Hydrological Study x Site Plan I Photos of Site & -- Biological Study --Parcel Map Setting I Archaeological Survey Precise Plan Tentative Subd. Map Noise Assessment Specific Plan Improvement Plans I Traffic Impact Report Other Agency Permit or Soils Report Other Approvals Required '~': ? /Per, !2/721 - 2 - B. PROPOSED PROJECT 1. Land Area: sq. footage. 35,600 or acreage 0.82 If land area to be dedicate~i state acreage and purpose. TO BE D~'~'~F~MINEDTHROUGHENGI~iING REVJ~W. 2. Complete this section if project is residential. a. Type development: Single family Two family .. Multi family Townhouse Condominium b. Number of structures and heights c. Number of Units: 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms 3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms Total units d. Gross density (DU/total acres) e. Net density IDU/total acres minus any dedication) f. Estimated project population g. Estimated sale or rental price range h. Square footage of floor areals) i. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures j. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided k. Percent of site in road and paved surface 3. Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial. a. Type(s) of land use GAS FACILZTY MINI-MART-924 b. Floor area CARWASH-648 Height of structure(s) 1 STORY c. Type of construction used in the structure d. Describe major access points to the structures and the orientation to adjoining properties and streets ACCESS TO STRUCTURES IS FRO61WII"HIN THE SITE & ACCESS TO S±'~'~ IS ~i~OM 2 DRIVES e. Number of on-site parking spaces provided 5 f. Estimated number of employees per shift 2-3 , Number of shifts 3 Total 8 g. Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate 680 - 40 /HR. @ 10 HRS. ESTIMATED PF~K _ 20 /HR. @ 14 HRS. ESTIMATf]DREMAiNDER -3- h. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate ~ BUSINESS VICIN±'I% ~ FREEWAY ~S~m~ . i. Type/extent of operatio6s not in enclosed buildings cA~ ~k~l~lrFCl~ - ~ T.qTANDS / 4 D/SPI~ISERS j. HOURS Of operation 24 HRS. k. Type of exterior lighting HIGH LEVEL AREA, 400 WA~I~ LOW LEVEL AREA LIGA~ CANOPY - DOWN LIGHTING 4. If project is other than residential, commercial or industrial complete this section. a. Type of project b. Type of facilities provided c. Square feet of enclosed structures d. Height of structure(s) - maximum e. Ultimate occupancy load of project f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS 1. If the project could result in the direct emission of any air pollu~nts, (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.) identify them. 2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated NO (If yes, complete the following:) a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many cubic yards of earth will be excavated? b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed? c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded? d. What will be the - Maximum depth of cut Average depth of cut Maximum depth of fill Average depth of fill - 4 - 3. DescribJ all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of energy used (air conditioning, electrical appliance, heating equipment, etc.) SM/U~L ~ ~ OONDITiONERF K~ECTRIC MICROWAVE, OOOLER,~'SOFT DRINK DISPENSER~ 51NERGY ~'ICIENT CARWASH EQUIPMENT. 4. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project (sq. ft. or acres) NONE - 5. If the project will result in any employment opportunities describe the nature and type of these jobs. W-U~t~/lqTA_TNC~ NL~ER OF ~Iv!PLOY~D POSITIONS. 6. Will highly flan~nable or potentially explosive materials or substances be used or stored within the project site? YES - C~SOLINE 7. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by the project? 780 - SANDAG ESTIMATE 8. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the project, and their points of access or connection to the project site. Improvements include but not limited to the following: new streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer lines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. UT/L±'I'~S EXIST, TWO NEW 35'-0" APPROACHES. D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1. Geology Has a geology study been conducted on the property? NO (If yes, please attach) Has a Soils Report on the project site been made? NO (If yes, please attach) 2. Hydrology Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site? (If yes, please explain in detail.) a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water table? NO b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site? NO - 5 - c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly into or toward a domestic water supply, lake, reservoir or bay? d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas? NO e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location. 1-CATCH BASINS AT EACHDR/VE LOCATION IF R~QUIREDBY 3. Noise a. Will there be any noise generated from the proposed project site or from points of access which may impact the surrounding or adjacent land uses? NO 4. Biology a. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state? b. Indicate type, size and quantity of trees on the site and which (if any) will be removed by the project. NONE 5. Past Use of the Land a. Are there any known historical resources located on or near the .project site? NO b. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project site? YES - CURR~YTHEREARE UI~ERGROUND STDRAG~ T~qKS FDRMCFIXDR FlJ-EiL ANID ONE WA~I~EOILTAIX~K. 6. Current Land Use a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the project site. EXISTING 3 BAY SERVICE FACILITY @ 1,902 S.F. 2 ISLAND/4 DISPENSER GAS SERVICE. -6- b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on adjacent property. North 3 STORY HOTEL South "E" ~ East McDONALD'S RESTAU~U~W~' West RATTROADS/TROT,nk~Y TRACKS 7. Social a. Are there any residents on site? (If so, how many?) NO b. Are there any current employment opportunities on site? (If so, how many and what type?) YES-MI~CHANIC & SAT.W-q EMPLOYEES - 5 Please provide any other information which could expedite the evaluation of the proposed project. - 7 - E. CERTIFICATION or Owner/owner in escrow* Consultant or Agent* HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and information herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all known information c~ncerning the project and its setting have been included in Parts B, C and D of this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for attachments thereto. DATE: *If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name. -8- Case No. CITY DATA F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Current Zoning on site: ~K~ North ,, " ' ' ' ' South , ....... East ' " ' ' West ,, ,' ,, ,, Do~ {y_~_ jZ~j~/ix~.s t e project conform ~o the current zoning? '~/ 2. General Plan land use designation on site: ~~-~L~ North South rOboL'l el East ~ ~_~ West Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram? __~ Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent to an area so designated? Is the pr~ject located adjacent to any scenic routes? /tgm (If yes, describe the design techniques being used to protect or enhance the scenic quality of Chula Vista.) How many acres of developed parkland are within the Park Service District of this project as shown in the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan? / What is the current park acreage requirements in the Park Service District? ~. ~ How many acres of parkland are necessary to serve ~the proppsed project? (2AC/1000 pop.) ~/~ - /~~ ,-~ P,'~F~ ~_~y_d AJU~ ~ / Does the project site provide access to or have the potential to provide access to any mineral resource? (If so, describe in detail.) -9- 3. School s If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following: Current Current Students Generated School Attendance Capacity From Project E1 emen~r.~ Sr. High 4. Aesthetics Does the project contain features which could be construed to be at a variance from nearby features due to bulk, form, texture or color? (If 5. Energy Consumption Provide the estimated consumption by the proposed project of the following sources: Electricity (per year) ~o~m~ Natural Gas (per year)-) Water {per day) 6. Remarks: Director bt Planning or Representative Date -lO- Case NO. G. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1. Drainage a. Is the project site within a flood plain? b. Will the project be subject to any existing flooding hazards?%5o c. Will the project create any flooding hazards? d. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities? ~g~=~c~_ o~w~&, Y L~ e. Are they adequate to serve the project? f. What is the location and description of'existing offXsite drainage facilities? ~'~cP v~ ~"S~. ~L~o5 g. Are they adequate to serve the project? ~5 2. Transportation a. What roads provide primary access to the project? b. W~at is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be generated by the project (per day)? ~0 c. What is the ADT and estimated level of service before and after project completion? Be fore After L.O.S. ~ C d. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project? If not, explain briefly. e. Will it be necessary that additional dedication, widening and/or improvement be made to existing streets? ~ ' If so, specify the general nature of the ~cessary actions. [2__-~oT -ll - Case No, 3. Geology a. Is the project site subject to: Known or suspected fault hazards? Liquefaction?  Landslide or slippage? b,' Is an engineering geology report necessary to evaluate the \ project? '4. Soils a, Are there any. anticipated adverse soil conditions on the project site? ~ W-~o~j hJ b. If yes, what are these adverse soil conditions? c, Is a soils report necessary? ~ 5, Land Form a. What is the average natural slope of the site? ~-L~-F b. 1~nat is the maximum natural slope of the site? ~FL~,T 6, Noise Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required of the applicant? '"t~<::~ Case No. 7. Air Quality If there is any direct or indirect automobile usage associated ~ith this project, complete the following: Total Vehicle Trips Emission Grams of {per day) Factor Pollution Hydrocarbons i //. ~_.0 X 18.3 : NOX (NO2) / ~' X 20.0 = Particulates X 1.5 = Sulfur X .78 = 8.Waste Generation How much solid and liquid (sewage) waste will be generated by the proposed project per day? What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or adjacent Are they adequate to serve the proposed project? 9. Publi~ Facilities/Resources Impact If the project could exceed the threshold of having any possible significant impact on the environment, please identify the public facilities/resources and/or hazards and describe the adverse impact. (Include ~ny potential to attain ~nd/or exceed the c~pacity of any public street, sewer, culvert, etc. serving the project area.) Remarks/necessary mitigation measures City ~glneer or ~,cpre-senrJtive Dare H. FIRE DEPARll4ENT 1. What is the distance to the nearest fire station and what is the Fire Department's esJimated reaction time 2. Will the ~ire Department be able to provide an adequate level of fire protection for the proposed facility without an increase in equipment or personnel? -13(a)- Case No. /_c-.~/--~.F H-1. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1. Are existing neighborhood and community parks near the project adequate to serve the population increase resulting from this project? Neighborhood Community parks /k)//ek 2. If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed as part of the project adequate to serve the population increase? Neighborhood ~ / /~ Community parks ti/ I/'% 3. Does this project exceed the Parks and Recreation Thresholds established by City Council policies? Parks and Recreation Director or Date Represe~tative Sweecwater Union High School District ADMINISTRATION CENTER 1130 Elk"TH AVENUE CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 92011 (619) 691-5553 ~! July 18. 1990 ~UL~ 3-'1 19~0 city of Chula vista Planning Department 276 Pourth Avenue Chula Vista. CA 92010 ATTENTION: DOUGLAS D. REID FILE NO: IS-91-03 PROJECT APLICANT: NOBIL OIL CORPORATION PROJECT LOCATION: 765 "E" STREET PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NOBIL OIL STATION RENODEL AND ADDITION OF NINI-NART AND CAR#ASH FACILITY The above project will have an impact on the Sweetwater Union High School District. Payment of school fees will be required pursuant to Government Code No. 65995 (Developer Fees), prior to Issuance of building permit. Cord~v~lly, THomas Silva Director of Planning TS/mi CHUI, _ 'VISTA CITY SCHOG.,_, DISTRICT 84 EAST "J" STREET · CHULAVISTA, CALIFORNIA 92010 · 619 425-9600 EACH CHILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH BOARD OF E~TION JOSEPHD. CUMMINGS,~.D. July 20, 1990 . SHARONGILES ' PATRICK A. JUDD JUDY~HULENBERG F~NKA. TARANTINO ~'U~ 2 ~ i<; ,} Ms. Maryann Miller .... SUPERI~ENDE~ Environmental Review Coordinator ~MNF. VUGRm. P,.D. City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 92010 R£: location: 765 £ Street Applicant: Mobil Oil Corporation Case No: IS-91-03 Project: Mobile Oil Station remodel/addition of mini-mart and carwash facility Dear Ms. Miller: This is to advise you that the Mobile Oil Station project is located within the Chula Vista Elementary School District which serves children from Kindergarten through Grade 6. The Board of Education has established attendance area boundaries and transportation services. Feaster Elementary is the closest existing facility to the above referenced project. However, schools in the Chula Vista City School District are overcrowded and the District has added 25 relocatable classrooms over the past three years to assist in accommodating growth. Student~' are also being bused outside their attendance area boundaries to help alleviate this situation, and to help achieve ethnic balance. Please be advised that a developer fee will be imposed on the additional space being constructed at the current rate of $ .12 per square foot of commercial/industrial development to assist in providing elementary facilities. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Director of Planning KS:dp cc: Tait & Associates/Mobile Oil Corp. CZTY OF CHULA VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMEN1 Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters which will require discretionary action on the part of t~e City Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the application, bid, contract, or proposal. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION If real property is involved, list the names of all persons having any ownership interest. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION 2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation- or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. 4. Have you or any person named in (1) above had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No × If yes please indicate person(s) , 5. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes No X If yes, state which Councilmember(s): -. Person is defined as: "Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city, municipality, district or other political subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a unit." (NOTE: Attach additional pages - as necessary.) ' , // Date: , ~ (q~6 ' c on~ra~t~6~}a _ " Signaturef ~i/icant A-110 , Print or type name o~"d~ntractor/applicant City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of January 23, 1991 Page I 2. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit PCC-91-23~ request to construct a Brunswick Recreation Center at 845 Lazo Court within the Rancho del ReV Business Center - Leiserv, Inc. A. BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting permission to construct a Brunswick Recreation Center (consisting of a 48 lane bowling alley, pro shop, snack bar, lounge, billiard and game room, nursery, and multi-purpose league and community meeting room) on 4.3 acres at the end of Lazo Court in the Rancho del Rey Business Center. The property is designated EP-1B (Employment Park -Limited Industrial district) on the Rancho del Rey SPA I Plan. The Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial Study, IS-91-19, of potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the project. Based on the attached Initial Study and comments thereon, the Coordinator has concluded that there would be no significant environmental impacts, and recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on IS-91-19. The Design Review Committee will consider the project design on January 14, 1991 (Ref. DRC-91-42). Their action will be reported to the Commission at the public hearing. B. RECOMMENDATION 1. Based on the Initial Study and comments on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration, find that this project will have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-91-19. 2. Based on the findings contained in Section "E" of this report, adopt a motion to approve the request, PCC-91-23, subject to the condition that the plan shall comply with the plan approved or conditionally approved by the Design Review Committee (DRC-91-42). C. DISCUSSION Adjacent zoninq and land use North EP-1B Vacant, graded lots South OS East "H" Street; Permanent open space East EP-1B Vacant, graded lots West EP-2 Vacant, graded lots NOTE: OS=Open Space EP-2=Employment Park-Support Commercial City Planning Commission Agenda Items for Meeting of January 23, 1991 Page 2 Existinq site characteristics The project site consists of 4.3 acres (Lot #~s 10 & 11) within the Rancho del Rey Business Center. The property is located at the end of the Lazo Court cul-de-sac and backs on to East "H" Street. The site as well as the balance of the lots within the Rancho del Rey Business Center are currently vacant and have been graded for development. Proposed use The Recreation Center -- including a 48 lane bowling alley, pro shop, snack bar, lounge, billiard and game room, nursery, and multi-purpose league and community meeting room -- would be housed in a single, 43,250 sq. ft. building located in the south-central portion of the site and oriented to the north toward Lazo Court. Two driveways off Lazo Court would provide access to 276 parking spaces located to the sides and front of the building. Hours of operation would be from 9:00 a.m.-2:00 a.m., Monday through Saturday, and 9:00 a.m. 12:00 a.m. on Sunday, with 26 daytime and 47 nighttime employees. Weekday peak hours, with an average of 350 people at the facility at any one time, occur between 5:30 p.m. and 8:30 p.m. Weekend peaks involving the same number of people occur sometimes twice a day and at varying times depending on the season. An average of 150 people are at the facility at any one time during off-peak hours. The maximum rated occupancy of 550 people could occur a few times a year during major tournaments. D. ANALYSIS The proposal meets all of the underlying development standards of the RdR EP-1B district. The EP-1B district provides for the more intense business park activity of the two industrial designations listed in the RdR Business Center. It allows a wide variety of manufacturing and industrial uses as a matter of right, and other heavier commercial operations such as auto sales/repair, building materials/supplies, and high volume retail distribution centers upon the issuance of a conditional use permit. Recreation uses of a private, semi-private or commercial nature are also allowed by conditional use permit. The location as well as the peak hours of the Recreation Center will tend to minimize any adverse impacts associated with commercial operations impinging on industrial activities within the Business Center. The property adjoins the Business Center commercial district on the west and is located convenient to the westerly access point off East "H" Street. Also, the evening and weekend peak use periods will not conflict with the weekday peak for most other uses within the Center. City Planning Commission Agenda Items for Meeting of January 23, 1991 Page 3 The site is adequately separated from residential areas to the north and south so that any potential for noise in the parking area (following league bowling activities for instance) would not have an adverse impact on surrounding residents. The facility will in fact provide a convenient location to serve the recreational needs of the developing residential areas in and around Rancho del Rey and beyond. For these reasons, we have recommended approval of the request based on the findings listed in Section E below. The following comments have been submitted by the Engineering and Fire Departments: Enqineerina 1. A separate construction permit for work performed in the public right-of-way, 2. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, driveway approaches, 3. Sewer, Traffic Signal and Development Impact Fees on the building permit when issued. Fire 4. Required fire flow is 3,000 gpm. 5. Four fire hydrants are required subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 6. Provide Fire Department apparatus access to within 150 feet of any portion of the building or other approved alternative subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 7. Plans for any fire protection systems shall be submitted to Fire Department for approval prior to installation. 8. All water supplies, fire hydrants and roadways shall be installed, tested and operational prior to any combustible materials placed on-site. g. Fire extinguishers are required. E. FINDINGS 1. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the community. City Planning Commission Agenda Items for Meeting of January 23, 1991 Page 4 The proposed recreational facility will serve the needs of the residents in the surrounding area as well as the Chula Vista community in general by integrating a recreational amenity within a centrally-located and convenient employment park district. 2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. The proposal will develop the subject site in accordance with the Rancho Del Rey SPA I regulations and meet the performance standards established therein. The location minimizes any potential for conflict with surrounding industrial and residential uses. 3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified in the code for such use. The proposed use shall be required to comply with all applicable codes, conditions and regulations prior to issuance of development permits. 4. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely affect the general plan of the City or the adopted plan of any government agency. The issuance of this permit, as conditioned is consistent with the RdR SPA I Plan. WPC 8773P/2652P IAZAGON LN. CT. .EAST "H' STREET PROJECT LOCATION negative declaration PROJECT NAME: Brunswick Family Recreation Center PROJECT LOCATION: Rancho Del Rey Business Park, (East "H" Street) 845 Lazo Court, Chula Vista, California 92010 (APN: 640-292-04/640-292-05 PROJECT APPLICANT: Phillip Fitzgerald (Agent), 120 E. Sheridan Avenue, Suite 203, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma for Lesierv, Inc., One Brunswick Plaza~ Skokie Illinois 60077 CASE NO: IS 91-19 DATE: December 12, 1990 A. Project'Settinq The proposed project consists of a 43,250 square foot family recreation center on a 187,462 square foot (4.3 acre) site within the eighty (80) acre Rancho Del Rey Business Park, which is'currently under construction. The site is vacant and has been graded for future development. There are no sensitive plant, animal or cultural resources on the site. The project site fronts on and has access from Lazo Court, a cul de sac within the Rancho Del Rey project. The property also has frontage on East "H" Street but is separated from that roadway by topography. All required street improvements are being constructed as part of the overall development of the business park. Surrounding property to the south is primarily residential. The residences are separated from the business park by a canyon adjacent to the residential development, East "H" Street and the topography of the business park site. Surrounding properties to the north, east and west are all within the Rancho Del Rey Business Park. The project site and surrounding property are zoned PC (Planned Community). The General Plan designation for Rancho Del Rey is Research and Limited Manufacturing. B. Project Description The proposed project would consist of a 43,250 square foot family recreation center, with 264 parking spaces, to include 48 lanes of bowling with automatic scoring, a proshop, lounge, snack bar, nursery, 3 billiard tables, game room and storage lockers. The building will be of similar design to the rest of the Rancho Del Rey Business Park. Primary access will be from Lazo Court via Paseo Del Rey from East "H" Street. There will be two shifts of employees, 47 at night and 26 during the day for a total of 73. The use is anticipated to serve customers within a five mile radius. Hours of operation will be 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Sunday through Thursday; 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday. Exterior lighting in the parking lot will be high pressure sodium. city of chula vista planning department ¢I~YOF environmental review section EHULAVI~A -2- C. Compatibility with Zoninq and Plans The site is within the Rancho Del Rey Business Park. It is designated Research and Limited Manufacturing on the City's General Plan. The zoning is PC {Planned Community). In accordance with the PC zoning, the Rancho Del Rey SPA 1 standards have been adopted for the entire area. The site's land use district according to SPA 1 is EP 1-B {Business District}. The proposed use, a family recreation facility including a bowling alley, is a permitted use in SPA 1 with a Conditional Use Permit. With conformance to the conditions of approval for a Conditional Use Permit, the proposed project would be compatible with the zone, SPA ! Standards and General Plan designation. D. Compliance with the Threshold/Standards Policy 1. Fire/EMS The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fire and emergency medical units must be able to respond throughout the City to calls within five minutes in 75% of the cases and seven minutes in 85% of the cases. The entire Rancho Del Rey Business Park was evaluated for compliance with this policy. Improvements constructed as part of the overall development have ensured that this project is compatible with the City's policy. 2. Police The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5 minute~ or less. Police units must respond to 62% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. Therefore, the project is considered to be compatible with the City's policy. 3. Traffic The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that a Level of Service {LOS) "C" be maintained at all intersections, with the exception that LOS "D" may occur at signalized intersections for a period not to exceed a total of two hours per day. The existing Average Daily Traffic {ADT} on East "H" Street is estimated to be 22,120. There are no ADTs for Lazo Court or Paseo Del Rey at this time since they are newly constructed streets within the project. Upon completion, the ADT on East "H" Street is expected to be 23,560. The estimated LOS on all three streets associated with the project, after project completion, will continue to be "A". All necessary street improvements have been constructed as a part of the Rancho Del Rey Business Park, therefore, the proposed project is compatible with the City's policy. -3- 4. Park/Recreation The project does not propose any residential land uses that would create impacts on park and recreational facilities. Therefore, the proposed project is deemed compatible with the City's policy. 5. Drainage The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that water flows and volumes must not exceed City engineering standards. All necessary drainage improvements have been constructed as a part of the Rancho Del Rey Business Park, therefore, the proposed project is compatible with the City's policy. 6. Sewer The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that sewage flows and volumes must not exceed City engineering standards. The proposed project could generate an estimated 9,600 gallons per day of liquid waste which will be served by the existing lO-inch sewer line in Lazo Court and 8-inch sewer line in East "H" Street. This line is considered to be adequate to serve the proposed project. The project is considered to be compatible with the City's policy, and sewer access has already been made available to the site in compliance with established threshold standards. 7. Water The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that adequate water service be available for proposed projects. Water service is already available to the project site, and no significant increases in water usage is anticipated. Therefore, the proposed project is considered to be compatible with the established threshold standards. E. Identification of Environmental Effects There is no substantial evidence, as a result of an Initial Study conducted on the project site, that any significant environmental effects will be created as a result of the proposed project. With compliance to the conditions of project approval for the Conditional Use Permit and design of the proposed building being in compliance with Design Review, the proposed project will not create any significant effects on the environment. No potential impacts were identified that could result from this project. F. Mitiqation necessary to avoid siqnificant effects Because there is no substantial evidence that the project will create any significant environmental effects, mitigation measures are not deemed to be necessary. -4- G. Findinqs of Insiqnificant Impacts Based on the following findings, it is determined that the project described above will not have a significant environmental impact and no environmental impact report needs to be prepared. 1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. The project site will not impact any rare or endangered species nor the habitat of any sensitive plant or animal species. The site was previously studied for potential environmental impacts as part of the overall Rancho Del Rey Business Park development and Environmental Impact Report. The site is vacant and has been graded for future construction. 2. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. With compliance to the conditions of project approval and the Rancho Del Rey Business Park SPA 1, the project will be consistent with uses designated by the zone, General Plan, and SPA. The project will not achieve any short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-term goals since long-term goals will be achieved through the Conditional Use permit process. 3. The project has possible effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, "cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effect of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. The site is within the Rancho Del Rey Business Park, an eighty {80) acre site currently under construction. Prior to project approval, an Environmental Impact Report was prepared that considered the cumulative impacts of the entire project. The proposed project will not have any cumulative impacts beyond that which was addressed in the EIR for the entire development. 4. The environmental effects of the project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The project will not result in any significant increase in hazardous substances, the release of emissions, or any significant increase in ambient noise levels. The proposed project will not create any substantial adverse impacts to human beings. -5- H. Consultation 1. Individuals and Organizations City of Chula Vista: Marilyn Ponseggi, Environmental Review Coordinator Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer Marty Schmidt, Parks and Recreation Alex Saucedo, Building and Housing Steve Griffin, Advanced Planning Carol Gove, Fire Marshal Keith Hawks, Police Department Sweetwater Union High School District: Thomas Silva Chula Vista School District: Kate Shurson Applicant Agent: Phillip Fitzgerald, Fitzgerald and Associates 2. Documents Chula Vista General Plan (1989) Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code Rancho Del Rey SPA I Environmental Impact Report This determination, that the project will not have any significant environmental impacts, is based on the attached Initial Study, any comments on the Initial Study and any comments on this Negative Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review of the project is available from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California 92010. Environmental Review Coordinator EN 6 (Rev. 3/88) WPC 8740P FOR OFFICE USE INITIAL STUDY Receipt No. City of Chula Vista Accepted by Application Form Project No. A. BACKGROUND 1. PRO3ECT TITLEBrunswick Family Recreation Center 2. PROJECT LOCATION (Street address or description)Rancho D~l R~y ~n~iness Park, 845 T,mzo C~]~rf: ~'hl~lm vi:~. m~!ifernia 92019 Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. Lot 1,0 - 640-292-04 Lot 11 640-292- 05 3. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION 43,250 s.f. family recreation, center including 48 lanes of bowling w/ automatic scoring, proshop, lounge snack bar, nurseryt 3 billiards tables, oame room~ & storm~e locke~ 4. Name of Applicant Leiserv, Inc. Address One Brunswick Plaza Phone 7~R-~Th-~l19 City Skokie State Illinois Zip 6~77 5. Name of Preparer/Agent Phillip Fitzgerald Address 120 E. ~qh~r~dmn AV~ ~ ~e ?n~ Phone 405-23g-?~6 City Oklahoma City, State OK Zip 721~A Relation to Applicant architect 6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents requi~ed by the Environmental Review Coordinator. a. Permits or approvals required: General Plan Revision Design Review Committee Public Project -- Rezoning/Prezoning -- Tentative Subd. Map Annexation Precise Plan Grading Permit Design Review Board -- Specific Plan Tentative Parcel Map Redevelopment Agency x Cond. Use Permit Site Plan & Arch. Review -- Variance Other b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Coordinator). Location Map Arch. Elevations Eng. Geology Report Grading Plan Landscape Plans __ Hydrological Study -- Site Plan -- Photos of Site & Biological Study -- Parcel Map Setting -- Archaeological Survey -- Precise Plan Tentative Subd. Map -- Hoise Assessment -- Specific Plan -- Improvement Plans -- Traffic Impact Report --Other Agency Permit or--Soils Report Other Approvals Required - 2 - B. PROPOSED PROJECT 1. Land Area: sq. footage 187,462 or acreage 4.3 If land area to be dedicated, state acreage and purpose. 2. Complete this section if project is residential. a. Type development: Single family Two family Multi family Townhouse Condominium b. Number of structures and heights c. Number of Units: 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms 3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms Total units d. Gross density (DU/total acres) e. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication) f. Estimated project population g. Estimated sale or rental price range h. Square footage of floor area(s) i. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures j. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided k. Percent of site in road and paved surface 3. Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial. a. Type(s) of land use recreational b. Floor area 43,250 s.f. Height of structure(s) 20'-6" c. Type of construction used in the structure ?¥pe IIZ 1 hr. d. Describe major access points to the structures and the orientation to adjoining properties and streets 3 entrances the main entrance faces the cul-de-sac e. Number of on-site parking spaces provided 274 47-night f. Estimated number of employees per shift 26-da~ rlumber of shifts 2 Total ?3 employees g. Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate - 3 - h. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate 5 mile radius i. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings ~arkin~ only j. Hours of operation 9 a.m. to 1 am Sun-Thurs; 9 am to 2 am Fri-Sa k. Type of exterior lighting high pressure sodium 4. If project is other than residential, commercial or industrial complete this section. a. Type of project b. Type'of facilities provided c. Square feet of enclosed structures d. Height of structure(s) - maximum e. Ultimate occupancy load of project f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS 1. If the project could result in the direct emission of any air pollutants, (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.) identify them. None admitted 2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated yes (If yes, complete the following:) a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many cubic yards of earth will be excavated? appx. 350 cu. yd. b. Ho~,~ many cubic yards of fill will be placed? appx. 350 cu. yd. c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded? appx. 3.5 acres d. What will be the - Maximum depth of cut 18" Average depth of cut 9" Maximum depth of fill 18" Average depth of fill 9" - 4 - 3. Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of energy used lair conditioning, electrical appliance, heating equipment, etc.)Air conditioning, heating, automatic pinsetters, lighting, exhaust fan, scorzng monztors, snack bar equipment, electronic games, total electric 4. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project (sq. ft. or acres) 54,000 s.f. 5. If the project will result in any employment opportunities describe the nature and type of these jobs.center manager, program director, asst mqrs, telephone solicitors~ mechanics~ snack bar, asst. mech., lounge mgr part time help 6. Will highly ~%ammab]e or potentially explosive materials or substances.be used or stored within the pr03ect site? No' 7. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by the project? 8. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the project, and their points of access or.connection to the project site. Improvements include but not limited to the following: new streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer lines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. None D. DESCRIPTION.OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1. Geology Has a geology study been conducted on the property? yes (If yes, please attach) Has a Soils Report on the project site been made? yes (If yes, please attach) 2. Hydrology Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site? .yes - e (If yes, please explain in detail.) a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water table? no b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site? no - 5 - c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly into or toward a domestic water supply, lake, reservoir or bay? No d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas? No e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location, catch basins~ ribbon gutter to approved storm drains 3. Noise a. Will there be any noise generated from the proposed project site or from points of access which may impact the surrounding or adjacent land uses? None 4. Biology a. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state? No-the site has been graded & landscaped for business use b. Indicate type, size and quantity of trees on the site and which (if any) will be removed by the project. None 5. Past Use of the Land a. Are there any known historical resources located on or near the project site? No b. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project site? No 6. Current Land Use a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the project site. There are no structures on the site. The site is currently vacant & has been graded into pads for business development. - 6 - b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on adjacent property. North Lazo Court - Cul-de-sac South "H" Street East Vacant land buildinq pad West vacant land buildinq pad 7. Social a. Are there any residents on site? (If so, how many?) No b. Are there any current employment opportunities on site? (If so, how many and what type?) po$$±bl¥ local construct±on trades Please provide any other information which could expedite the evaluation of the proposed project. - 7 - E. CERTIFICATION -- ~rr~ or Consultant or Agent* HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and information herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all known information concerning the project and its setting have been included in Parts B, C and B of this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for attachments thereto. DATE: *If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name. -8- Case No. :/_~- CITY DATA F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Current Zoning on site: North South East West Does the project conform to the current zoning?~d% "~,~r~r},~ ~'.t ~'.,~ 2. General Plan land use ~es~gnation on site: ~~L~m~kc~,[ bq&n~ North ~c~ ~,*~ ~0.~'~'~.'~ South ~- r~<~ ~.~ ~t"~,r~ ~[ Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram? ? Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent to an area so designated? Is the prospect located adjacent to any scenic routes? (If yes, describe the design techniques being used to protect or enhance the scenic quality of Chula Vista. ) ~¢~. +~ ~O,~c-~ How many acres of developed parkland are within the Park Service District of this project as shown in the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan? ~ What is the current park acreage requirements in the Park Service District? How many acres of~arkland are necessary to serve the proposed project? (2AC/lO00 pop.) (6 Does the project site provide access to or have the potential to provide access to any mineral resource? (If so, describe in detail.) -9- 3. School s If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following: Current~ Current Students Generated School Attendance Capacity From Project E1 ementary Jr. Hi gh Sr. High 4. Aesthetics Does the project contain features which could be construed to be at a variance from nearby features due to bulk, form, texture or color? {If so, please describe.) ~. 5. Energy Consumption Provide the estimated consumption by the proposed project of the following sources: ~ Electricity (per year) ~ Natural Gas (per year) ~ Water (per day) ~~ Diffecto~ o~ Planning or RJY~tresentative Date -lO- Case No. q !- l°/ G. ENGINEERING DEPARTNENT 1. Drainaqe a. Is the project site within a flood plain? b. Will the project be subject to any existing flooding hazards? c. Will the project create any flooding hazards? d. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage fa,cilitie_r~s,? ~©AJ~--~--7-~ /~R~)~L/ ~Z~- e. Are they adequate to serve the project? lXjO f. What is the location and description of existing off-site drainage facilities? ~ c~ /M~ ~ AJOR17~ EA)D ox~- g. Are they adequate to serve the project? 2. Transportation a. What roads provide primary access to the project? L-/L~_~4) c~b~/~r~- -Ag-T s'TT b.W~t is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be generated by the project (per day)? (~ c. What is the ADT and estimated level of service before and after project completion? Before After A.D.T. ~0 C20dAJT-~ L~\-Y-O L. O.S. ~ u. A~Z~ Co ~','<7 ' d. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project? ~/~.~ If not, explain briefly. e. Will it be necessary that additional dedication, ~dening and/or improvement be made to existing streets? ~k/~ If so, specify the general nature of the necessary actions. Case No. 3. Geology a. Is the project site subject to: Known or suspected fault hazards? Liquefaction? Landslide or slipPage?~ b. Is an engineering geolo~ report necessary to evaluate the project? 4. Soils a. Are there any anticipated adverse soil conditions on the project b. If yes, what are these adverse soil conditions? ...... c. Is a soils report necessary? S. Land Form a. What is the average natural slope of the site? b. ~at is the maximum natural slope of the site? 6. Noise Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required of the applicant? - 12 - Case No. 7. Air Quality If there is any direct or indirect automobile usage associated with this project, complete the following: Total Vehicle Tr~p's ..... Emission Grams of Iper day) Factor Pollution CO [c~ llrO X 118.3 : Hydrocarbons X 18.3 : NOx (NO2) " X 20.0 = Particulates " X 1.5 = Sulfur ., X .78 : 8. Waste Generation How much solid and liquid (sewage) waste will be generated by the proposed project per day? What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or adjacent to the site? ~ lo"~ ~ /~ ~ ~a~ Are ~hey adequate ~o serve ~he proposed project? 9. Public Facilities/Resources ~f the projec~ could exceed ~he threshold of h~v~ng any possible s~gn~f~can~ ~mp~c~ on ~he environment, ~lease ~den~fy ~he public facilities/resources and/or hazards and describe ~he adverse ~m~ac~. (~nclude any po~en~l ~o a~a~n ~nd/or exceed ~he capacity of any public s~ree~, sewer, culvert, e~c. serving ~he projec~ area.) Remarks/necessary mitigation measures -13(a)- Case No. /~ ~- ×f H-1. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1. Are existing neighborhood and community parks near the project adequate to serve the population increase resulting from this project? Neighborhood Community parks 2. If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed as part of the project adeq~gate to serve the population increase? Neighborhood Community parks 3. Does this project exceed the Parks and Recreation Thresholds established by City Council policies? Parks and Recreation Director or Date Representative CHUI,A ISTA CITY SCHOOL-DISTRICT 84 EAST "J" STREET · CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92010 · 619 425-9600 JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS, ~.D. SHARON GILES JUDY~HULENSERG F~NKATARANTiNO November 5, 1990 SUPERI~ENDENT ~HNF. VUGRIN, Ph.O. MS, Maryann Miller Planning Department City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 92010 RE: IS-91-19 / FA-505 / DP-801 Applicant: Leiserv, Inc. Location: Rancho del Rey Business Park - East "H" Street -Project: Brunswick Family Recreation Center (Bowling Alley, Snack Shop & Billard Room) Dear Ms. Miller: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above project. The Rancho del Rey Community has formed a community facilities district to provide financing for all elementary facilities required to serve the project. Since this recreation center is a part of Rancho del Rey, school mitigation has been satisfied through participation in the community facilities district. Sincerely, Kate Shurson Director of Planning KS:dp cc: Phillip Fitzgerald Leiserv, Inc. Sweetwater Union High School District PLANNING DEPARTMENT November l, 1990 Ms. Maryann C. Miller City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 92010 Dear Ms. Miller: Re: IS-91-18-19/Brunswick Family Recreation Center Rancho del Rey Business Park - East "H" Street As a follow up to my letter dated October 29, 1990, I have concluded that although this project will have an imoact to the Sweetwater Union High School District, that impact has been mitigated by the establishment of Community Facilities District No. 3. Therefore, no fees will be required for this project. Cordially, Director of Planning TS/sf Sweetwater Union High School District October 59, 1990 Ms. Maryann C. Miller Planning ~eDartment City of Chula Vista P.O. Box 1087 Chula Vista, Ca 92010 Dear Ms. Miller: Re: IS-gl-19/Brunsw~ck Family Recreation Center Rancho del Rey Bus~ness Park - East "H" Street The above ~roject will have an imoact on the Sweetwater Union HiQh School District. Payment of school fees will be required pursuant to Government Code No. 65995 (Develooer Fees) prior to issuance of building oermit. Cor~q~all¥, Director of Planning TS/sf EXISTING PROPERTY OWNER CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATE~NT IAPPLtCANT'S STATEM[NT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS IWHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING ICOMMISSION AND ALL OTHER OFFICIAL BODIES. . Fh~ following information must be disclosed: I. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the application. McMillln Communtties~ Inc., National Ci~y, CA 92050 ~. .. _ Home Capital Development Group, a subsidiary of Home Fe~.~l Savings & Loan, San Diego, CA List the names of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Rancho Del Rey Partnership~ a. California General Partnership composed of lA and lB above If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the. shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. McMillin Communities, Inc: McMtllin Family Trust-Macey L. & Vonnle L. MoMillin Trustees (~0~) Mark D. McMillin, Laurie A. Ray & Scott M. McMillin {20~ each) Hom~ Cap~__ta_l.__Devel~ment Group) 1OO~ by. Home Federal Savings & Loan, San Diego~ CA If any person identified pursuant to {1) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. N/A ............. _ . ~ ..... 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No x If yes, please indicate person(s) ......... [Person ~s defined as. Any ~d~vidual, f~rm, copartnership, joint ventu?, assoc!~t ~n, I~ club, fraternal organization, corporation,.estate, tru~? re~¥e~,.ayn~lc~?, i )this and any other county, city and county, city, municipality, u~scr~c~ or other political subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a unit." (.~OT~:.. Attach additional pages as necessary.)y.,~(~ ~A~YF~...__ ~ ~i9nature of appli~t/date WPC O701P Ken Baumgartner, ~xecutlve V.P. A-110 Print or type name of applicant RANCHO ~£L R[Y PARTNERSHIP CITY OF CHULA VISTA ~ FUTURE PROPERTY '~ PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OWNERS Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters which will require discreti6nary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the application, bid, contract, or proposal. Leiserv, Inc,, a Delaware Corporation If real property is involved, list the names of all persons having any ownership interest. 2. If any person identified pursuant to (]) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. Leiserv, Inc, is Wholly owned by Brunswick Corporation; a Delaware Corporation 3. If any person identified pursuant to (l) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. Leiserv, Inc. is not a non-profit organization, nor a trust 4. Have you or any ,person named in (1) above had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes Nox If yes, please,indicate person(s) 5. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes No x If yes, state which Councilmember(s): Person is defined as: "Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city, municipality, district or other political subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a unft." (~OT__E: Attach additional pages as nece,~ssar~ ~ (,~1 Date: I0'1~'~ Signa~re'~~)-~cOmf~ctor/applicant WPC 070lP ~[_ ~i~ A-110 Print or type name of contractor/applicant