Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 2010-067RESOLUTION NO. 2010-067 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE 2010 GMOC ANNUAL REPORT, AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO UNDERTAKE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AS PRESENTED IN THE STAFF RESPONSES AND PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS SUMMARY WHEREAS, the City's Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) is responsible for monitoring the threshold standazds for the City's eleven growth management quality of life indicators, and reporting their findings and recommendations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on December 15, 2009, the City Council approved Ordinance 3148, allowing the GMOC's 2010 Annual Report to be abbreviated, focusing on five of the Growth Management Program's eleven quality of life indicators, including: Fire, Fiscal, Libraries, Police and Traffic; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2010, the GMOC finalized its 2010 Annual Report; and WHEREAS, the report covers the period from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, identifies current issues in the second half of 2009 and eazly 2010, and assesses threshold compliance concerns over the next five yeazs; and WHEREAS, on April 1, 2010, the City Council held a duly noticed joint public heazing with the Planning Commission to consider the 2010 GMOC Annual Report; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon considering the Report, recommended that the City Council accept the Report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista accepts the 2010 GMOC Annual Report. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council directs the City Manager to undertake actions necessary to carry out the implementing actions as presented in the Staff Responses and Proposed Implementing Actions Summary (Exhibit A). Resolution No. 2010-067 Page 2 Deputy City Director Services Approved as to form by l~ Bart C. Miesfel City Attorne PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 1st day of Apri12010 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Bensoussan, Castaneda, Ramirez, Thompson and Cox NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ATTEST: Donna R. Norris, CMC, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) Cheryl Cox, yor I, Donna R. Norris, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2010-067 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 1st day of Apri12010. Executed this 1st day of Apri12010. /2~ ,'C /V p.4h,i~ Donna R. Norris, CMC, City Clerk Presented by ~M o ~ o ~ ,~ a 0 N 0 z c 0 .~ 0 R' F- m_ x x w 2010 CRO\VTH D'IANACENIL'NT OVTRSIGHT COMMISSION (GNIOC) RCCOAINII/NDATLONS / IMPLI'JMI;NTINC ACTIONS SUD4l\~IARY STAFF RESPONSES & GMOC RECOMMENDATIONS PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS 1. Libraries 1. Libraries 3.1.1 That the City Council formally identify and adopt funding 3.1.1 The Library welcomes the continuing support of the for an interim andlor permanent solution, based on GMOC to establish library service in the Rancho del recommendations from the Library Director, to bring the Rey area and other underserved parts of Chula Vista as library system closer to conformance before 2012. staff pursues multiple options for interim service. 3.1.2 That the Library Facilities Master Plan: 3.1.2 The Library will ensure that the Library Facilities Master 1j Consider changing trends to define adequacy of library Plan, which is scheduled to be updated in 2010, facilities, equipment, adequate staffing and hours of addresses the points raised by the GMOC. operation; and 2) Assess ultimate future library needs based upon the increased population from the City's updated General Plan. 2. Police 2. Police 3.2.1 Modification of the Priority II threshold standard, which has 3.2.1 The Police Department is currently reexamining been noncompliant for twelve consecutive years, may be Priority II calls for service to determine the appropriate appropriate, and should be considered during the top-to- classification and bifurcation of these calls, and will bottom review, focusing on the most important Priority II work with the GMOC during top-to-bottom this calendar year to discuss potential modifications to the calls. Priorit II threshold standard. 3. Traffic 3. Traffic 3.3,1 Implement recommended compliance solutions, including 3.3.1 Staff concurs with the GMOC recommendation and will eliminating the crosswalk on the west side of Telegraph implement solutions to bring the northbound Heritage Canyon Road and improving the Heritage Road(felegraph Road segment into compliance. Solutions to be Canyon Road intersection, as needed. completed this calendar year include eliminating the crosswalk across the west side of Telegraph Canyon Road to allow additional traffic signal timing adjustments. Page 1 of 2 ?010 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSTCIIT COlVll111SSION (G1vTOC) REC011~MENDATIONS /IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS SIIMI\~IARY GMOC RECOMMENDATIONS STAFF RESPONSES 8 PROPOSED IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS 4. Fiscal 4. Fiscal 3.4.1 That City Council direct the City Manager to develop a PFDIF 3.4.1 Staff plans to bring a comprehensive update of the facility prioritization policy 6y December 2010, which PFDIF to Council for consideration by the end of the includes an explanation for how priorities are determined, calendar year 2010. This update may reflect additional how facilities would be funded, how they will be reported, development mitigating facilities identified in new and impacts of the expenditures. The policy should be master plans, including pending master plans for Fire, brought back to City Council for adoption, and the list Libraries, and Park & Recreation. Any changes to the should be used as a basis for all decisions by the City 2005 General Plan authorized development would also Council on any PFDIF funding proposals. be included in this update. Presentation of a project prioritization list in conjunction with this update is recommended. 5. Fire 8 Emergencv Services 5. Fire &Emergencv Services 3.5.1 That the Fire Department continues to monitor the 3.5.1 The Fire Department will continue to track data on call effectiveness of using San Diego Dispatch in regards to volume and response times since the transition to San meeting the threshold standard. Diego Dispatch, and report results to,the'GMOC during their next annual review cycle. 0 0 r. 0 N 0 z 0 .y N I~~ I. Page 2 of 2