HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/1984/05/23 AGENDA
City Planning Commission
Chula Vista, California
Wednesday, May 23, 1984 - 7:00 p.m. City Council ~!~[~ ....
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - SILENT PRAYER
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Meeting of April 11, 1984
ORAL COMMUNICATION
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of request for extension of tentative
subdivision map, David, Rigdon & St. Marie, Chula
Vista Tract 81-2, 564 'J' Street - Constant David
2. PUBLIC HEARING: (Continued) PCZ-84-H: Consideration to rezone the
easterly 293 feet of a 2.95 acre parcel located at
the northeast corner Broadway and Moss Street from
C-T to R-3 Wayne Bienhoff
3. PUBLIC HEARING: (Continued) PCC-84-16: Request to construct a 136-unit
senior housing project located at the northeast corner
of Broadway and Moss Street - Wayne Bienhoff
4. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of tentative subdivision map for The Nine,
Chula Vista Tract 84-6 - The WIL Corporation
5. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit PCC-84-21: Request to construct
service station/car wash/mini mart at 1291 Third Avenue -
Texaco, Inc.
6. PUBLIC HEARING: Modification of conditional use permit PCC-83-14:
South Bay Community Convalescent Hospital, 731 Dora Lane -
Community Hospital
7. Consideration of PCM-84-8: Revocation of home occupation permit at 724 Nolan
Avenue, Lauro L. Parra
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
COMMISSION COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT AT to the Regular Business Meeting of June 13, 1984
at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
To: City Planning Commission
From: George Krempl, Director of Planning
Subject: Staff report on agenda items for Planning Commission Meeting of
May 23, 1984
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of request for an extension of the
tentative map for David~ Ri~don & St. Marie, Chula
Vista Tract 81-2 - Constant David
A. BACKGROUND
On June 9, 1981, the City Council approved the tentative map known as
David, Rigdon & St. Marie, Chula Vista Tract 81-2 for the purpose of
converting 32 units of a 34-unit apartment complex located at 564 "J" Street
in the R-3 zone into a one lot condominium project (two units are to be
renmved).
The applicant is requesting that the tentative map be extended for a
period of three years.
B. RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a motion approving a three-year extension of the tentative map for
David, Rigdon & St. Marie, Chula Vista Tract 81-2, the map to then expire on
June 9, 1987.
C. DISCUSSION
There have been no significant changes in the immediate vicinity which
affect the original conditions or findings of approval; therefore, the
extension is appropriate. No further extensions are permitted and a new
tentative map will have to be submitted if the map is allowed to expire.
WPC 0961P
- ---r-- --I I
I
I I !
I
I I
'~ ,s,~.. I .~ I ..s~I ~
I --~ . I I I
~__ i I I I
I~I I I
~ I I
~ ~ ' JAM~'
1
' '
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 2
2. PUBLIC HEARING: (Continued) PCZ-84-H; Consideration to rezone the
easterly 293 feet of a 2.95 acre parcel located aL
the northeast corner Broadway and Moss Street frolll
C-T to R-3 Wayne Bienhoff
A. BACKGROUND
This item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of May 9, 1984.
Since then the staff has met with the applicant to discuss the adequacy of the
proposed 150 foot depth of the C-T zoning.
The applicant has prepared several schematic plans showing how the property
could be developed at a depth of 150 feet. Some of the plans show a 10 foot
rear yard setback; however, when adjacent to a residential zone, the rear yard
setback must be 25 feet. In order to reduce the setback requirement, the P Precise
Plan Modifying District would have to be attached to the underlying zone.
While the plans have merit, the Planning Department is still of the opinion
that the depth should be 200 feet based on the following:
1. The 200 foot corresponds with the depth of the adjacent property to the
north.
2. The added depth provides more flexibility in development (without
encroaching into required rear yards).
3. 200 feet is the minimum established depth for commercial land use when
apartments are considered for development on commercially zoned property.
See attached report dated May 9, 1984 for complete report and recommendations.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of Nay 9, 1984
4. PUBLIC HEARING: PCZ-84-H - Consideration to rezone the easterl~ 293
feet of a 2.95 acre parcel located at the
northeasterl~ corner of. Broadway and Moss Street from
C-T to R-3 - Wayne Bienhoff
A. 8ACKGROUNO
1. This item involves a request to rezone the easterly 293 feet (1.95
acres) of a 2.95 acre parcel located at the northeasterly corner of Broadway
and Moss Street from C-T (Commercial Thoroughfare) to R-3 (Multiple Family
Residential, 32 DU's per acre).
2. The applicant has also submitted an application for a conditional use
permit requesting permission to construct a 136-unit senior housing project on
3.13 acres of property which includes the area of the proposed R-3 rezoning.
This request is the following agenda item.
3. An Initial Study, IS-84-24 of possible adverse environmental impacts
of the project was conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator on
April 24, 1004, who concluded that there would be no significant environmental
effects and recommended that the Negative Declaration be adopted.
B. RECOI~IENDATION
1. Find that this project will have no significant environmental impacts
and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-84-24.
2. Adopt a motion recommending that the City Council enact an ordinance
to change the easterly 2~43 feet only of a 2.95 acre parcel located at the
northeasterly corner of Broadway and Moss Street from C-T to R-3. (This would
leave a commercial depth of 200 feet on Broadway.)
C. DISCUSSION
1. Adjacent zoning and land use.
North C-T and R-3 Restaurant and residential
(single and multiple)
South (Co.) C-36 and RU-29 Commercial and residential
(single and multiple)
East R-3 Storage sheds (Approved 38-
unit condominium)
West (Co.) C-36 Commercial vacant
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 9, 1984
2. Existing st~ characteristics.
The subject property is a 2.95 acre level site developed with a
28-unit motel (Rancho Rego) consisting of three residential structures,
garage, swimming, pool, equipment/storage building and an office building. The
buildings set back a minimum of 50 feet from Broadway. Access is provided by
one driveway on each street. Moss Street is paved, but there are no curbs,
gutters or sidewalk. The paving, curbs and gutters are installed on Broadway,
but there is no sidewalk. A natural drainage channel (flowing westerly) runs
along the easterly 265~ feet of the northerly property line.
3. General plan.
The subject property is located in an area of the General Plan which
indicates a uniform depth of Commercial Thoroughfare and High Density
Residential (13 to 26 OU's per gross acre) immediately to the east. It should
be noted that the General Plan is not site specific and does not always
reject an actual zoning pattern. For this reason the depth of the C-T zoning
may be adjusted and remain consistent with the General Plan.
4. Broadway Study.
In 1972 the Broadway Study was conducted analyzing the strip
commercial zoning which existed along Broadway. In 1981 the Community
Development Department conducted another study aimed at determining whether
Broadway and other strip commercial areas ("E" and "H" Streets) should be
included as redevelopment areas. This study did conclude that redevelopment
was in order, but the property owners were not supportive and the matter has
been set aside.
The 1972 Broadway Study, though not adopted, recommended that the
commercial depth along the east side of Broadway between Arizona and Moss
Streets be increased. However, since this study was conducted, there have
been developments in the area which preclude this from happening. The study
did indicate that any increase in commercial depth be done with care, so as
not to adversely affect the adjoining land uses. It also recommended that in
the case of corner lots that the commercial uses be oriented toward Broadway
rather than the side streets.
D. ANALYSIS
The subject property has a lot depth of 443 feet from Broadway. The
Planning Department supports a change in the existing zoning pattern but Fot
to the extent advocated by the applicant. The depth of the commercial to the
north (City) is 200 feet and to the south (County), it is 132 feet. To the
rear (east) of the commercial, the zoning is for multiple family development
(R-3 and Ru-2g in the County). Thus the easterly 311 feet along Mess Street
is directly opposite residential zoning. The present lot configuration would
likely result in the property being developed with its primary orientation
towards Broadway. However, several access points would logically occur along
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 9, 1984
Moss Street impacting the residential land uses. The increase of commercial
traffic on Moss Street would have adverse effects on the residential
properties in that area. Based on the aforementioned, the Planning Department
supports the concept of some decrease in the commercial zoning.
To address the question of what constitutes a proper commercial zoning
depth, the characteristics of the area and proposed development plans must be
examined. The applicant is requesting that the C-T zone be established at a
depth of 150 feet and has submitted a conceptual plan which shows how the
property could be developed at that depth. Because the depth of the C-T zone
to the north is 200 feet, there is merit in maintaining the 200' depth as it
would allow added flexibility. It is, therefore, the Planning Department's
recommendation that the C-T zoning be at a depth of 200 feet from Broadway.
The rezoning, if approved, would split zone the property and the boundary
line would go through several existing structures. This would result in the
motel becoming a nonconforming use and subject to those provisions of the
Municipal Code pertaining to nonconforming uses. The applicant is aware of
the situation and is prepared to proceed with the development by clearing the
site in conjunction with the conditional use permit to build the senior
housing project on the residentially zoned lot.
If the Planning Commission supports the recommendation of the Planning
Department, the plans for the senior housing project will have to be revised
accordingly. Besides a reduction in lot area, a reduction in the number of
units would probably be in order.
WPC 0935P
negative declaration-
PROJECT NN4E: Chula Vista Senior Housing and Commercial Center
PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast corner of Broadway and Moss Street
PROJECT APPLICANT: Wayne Bienhoff, 444 Camino Del Rio South, Suite llg,
San Diego, CA 92108
CASE NO: IS-8~-24 DATE: April 24, 1984
A. Project Setti99
The project site consists of 4.13 acres of relatively flat property'
located at the northeast corner of Broadway and Moss Street. The property
currently 'contains a motel and various accessory structures. Adjacent
land uses consist of residential to the east and south, across Moss
Street, residential/commercial to the north and commercial across Broadway
to ~the west.
There are no significant natural or manmade resources present on the
project site and there are no geologic hazards existing on or near the
site. An uncovered unimproved drainage channel exists along the northerly
boundary of the project site, which is a leg of the Telegraph Canyon Creek
drainage course.
B. Project Description
The project consists of: a) the rezoning of approximately 1.96 acres from
CT (commercial thoroughfare) to R-3 (multiple family residential)
resulting in a 150 ft. depth of CT zoned property from Broadway, b) the
construction of 146 senior citizen apartment units and the construction of
ll,O00 sq. ft. of commercial ~Oor space.
C. Compatibility with'Zonin9 and Plans
The project involves a rezoning, a conditional use permit, and design
review for the senior citizen development. A commercial development is
presently permitted in the C-T zone. All proposed elements of the project
are compatible with the General Plan.
D. Identification of Environmental Effects
1. Drainage
The Telegraph Canyon Creek drainage culvert runs east to west along
the northerly property boundary of the project site. The Army Corps
of Engineers is presently studying the entire drainage course, and
the results may dictate the necessary easement width and
improvements. Development of the proposed project will require
compliance with Chapter 18.54 of the Municipal Code, which refers to
,oodproofing of developments located within a special flood hazar~
area (as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency).
city of chula vista planning department
environmental review section
-2-
Drainage improvements will be subject to approval of the City
Engineer.
2. School s
The proposed project involves the development of 146 senior citizen
apartments. There would be no impact on local schools as a result of
project implementation, as proposed.
3. Transportat.i.o.n
Existing traffic service levels on Broadway and Moss Street will not
change with project implementation. Full street improvements will be
required on the Broadway and Moss Street frontage, which may include
some street dedication for a right-hand turn lane on Moss Street at
Broadway. The above improvements will be standard engineering
requirements for development.
F. Findings of Insignificant Impact
1. There are no significant natural or manmade resources within the
project area which could be adversely affected by project
lmpl ementation.
2. The proposed rezoning and subsequent development is in conformance
with the General Plan and will not achieve short term to the
disadvantage of long term environmental goals.
3. All potential impacts can be mitigated through standard development
regulations. No impacts are anticipated to interact and cause a
cumulative effect on the environment.
4. The project will not create any source of significant noise or odors
nor will any significant hazards to human beings result from project
implementation.
G. Consul ration
1. Individuals and Organizations
City of Chula Vista: Steve Griffin, Associate Planner
Duane Bazzel, Assistant Planner
Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer
Tom Dyke, Building & Housing Dept.
Ted Monsell, Fire Marshal
Chuck Glass, City Traffic Engineer
Applicant's Architect: Bill Hedenkamp
-3-
2. Documents
Telegraph Canyon Channel Study, U. S. Army Corps of £ngfneers
Flood Insurance Study, Fed. Emergency Hanagement Agency (April 18,
1983)
City of Chula Vista General Plan
The Initial Study application and evaluation forms documenting the findings of
no significant impact are on file and available for public review at the Chula
Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
ENVIRO~ REVIEW COORDINATOR
WPC O175P
Eu. 6 (~e¥. l_~/~_°) city of chula vista planning department
environmental review reaction
EN 6 (Rev. 12/82)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
DISCLOSURE. STATE~NT
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS
IWHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING
ICOMMISSION AND ALL OTHER OFFICIAL BODIES. .
The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
List the names of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved.
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list
the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation
or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or a
trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City
staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes No ~( If yes, please indicate person(s)
IPerson is defined as: "Any indiv!dual, firm, copartnership, joint vJ~t~re, association,
~ club, fraternal organization, corporation,'ke~tate, trus~, receive[, syndicate,
this ~nd any .o~h~r county, city and~r~)an~v, fit.y~.'~x~uni~ipal~ty, ~is~F~ct or other
political subdlws~on, oranyother grqdpor~mb)nati~ct~ng as a unit.
%.,
(NOTE:
Attach additional pages as nece~~~~
Signature of applicant/date
WPC 0701P ~AO_4F~ C)un~_.~,~ ,~-~
A-110 Print or typq name of applicant
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 3
3. PUBLIC HEARING: (Continued) PCC-84-16; request to construct a 136-unit
senior housing project located at the.northeast corner
of Broadwa~ and Moss Street - Wayne Blenhoff
A. BACKGROUND
This item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting ~f May 9, 1984.
Please be advised that the applicant has decided to withdraw his application for
a conditional use permit to construct a 136-unit senior housing project at the
northeast corner of Broadway and Moss Street. The permit, therefore, should be
filed with no action. (See attached letter)
2700 Adams Avenue/San Diego, CA 92116 / 563-0080
May 22, 1984
To: Members of the Planning Commission
From: Ruth M. Smith, Secretary~
Subject: Item 4 (page 4) on Planning Commission Agenda for meeting of May 23,
1984.
Please change the Initial Study number shown as IS-81-4 to IS-81-40 in paragraph
2 of the public hearing considering the tentative sudivision map for The Nine.
A typographical error resulted in the incorrect Initial Study being sent to you.
The correct Initial Study, IS-81-40, is attached.
Thank you.
/rms"
Attachment
cc: The WIL Corporation
Algert Engineering
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 4
4. PUBLIC HEARING: PCS-84-6 - Consideration of tentative subdivision map
for Tme Nine - Chula Vista Tract 84-6 - WIL corporatl??
A. BACKGROUND
1. The applicant has submitted a tentative subdivision map known as The
Nine, Chula Vista Tract 84-6 in order to convert a 9-unit multiple family
project presently under construction at 385-391 "G" Street in the R-3 zone
into a one lot condominium project.
2. An Initial Study, IS-Sl-~k: of possible adverse environmental impacts
of the project was conducted b~ the Environmental Review Coordinator on
May 14, 1981. The Environmental Review Coordinator concluded that there would
be no significant environmental effects and recommended adoption of the
Ne gati ye Decl arati on.
B. RECOMMENDATION
1. Find that this project will have no significant environmental impacts
and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-81-4.
2. Based on the findings contained in Section "E" of this report, adopt
a motion recommending that the City Council approve the tentative
subdivision map for The Nine, Chula Vista Tract 84-6, subject to the
following conditions:
a. The owner shall remove and replace all broken or displaced
sidewalk along the frontage of "G" Street adjacent to the
subdivision.
b. The owner shall construct a driveway approach in accordance with
Chula Vista Construction Standard 1. Said driveway width shall
be a minimum of 20 feet.
c. The owner shall obtain a construction permit to do the work
required by conditions 1 and 2 prior to approval of the Final
Map. Work covered by said permit shall be completed within one
year of issuance of said permit.
C. DISCUSSION
1. Adjacent zoning and land use.
North R-3 Apartments
South R-3 Apartments & Vacant (corner lot)
East R-3 Two single family dwellings (same lot)
West R-3 Single family dwelling
City Planning Con~ntsston
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 5
2. Existing site characteristics.
The project site is comprise of two level parcels located on the
north side of "G" Street and approximately 54 feet east of Fourth Avenue. The
two parcels combined create a 107' x 130' lot with a total area of 13,962 sq.
ft. (0.32 acres). All of the street improvements have been installed. The
street right-of-way is 80 feet wide with a travelway of 40 feet and a distance
of 20 feet from face of curb to property line. There are several mature
pepper trees in the 13 foot parkway in front of the property.
3. Proposed development.
The nine-unit project was reviewed and approved by the Design Review
Committee on December 15, 1983 (DRC-84-4) and building permits have been
issued and construction is underway. The proposed development will consist of
six two-bedroom townhouse units and three one-bedroom flat units in a
combination two and three-story structure located on the easterly half of the
site. There will be six garages on the ground floor of the building. There
will also be a three-car garage and eight open spaces bringing the total
parking on-site to 17 spaces. Access is provided by a two-way driveway
located between the garage structure and the main building. The architecture
is of contemporary design with mission tile roofs, stucco exteriors with a
brick veneer on the first story and the garage facing the street. Each unit
will have either a patio or balcony.
D. ANALYSIS
The proposed development meets the requirements of the underlying zone as
well as the condominium requirements relating to private open space, storage
and parking. The purpose of the tentative map is for the sale of the units as
condominiums.
E. FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the tentative
subdivision map for Park Vista , Chula Vista Tract 84-6, is found to be in
conformance with the various elements of the City's General Plan based on the
following:
1. The site is physically suitable for the residential development and
the proposal conforms to all standards established by the City for
such projects.
2. The design of the subdivision will not affect the existing
improvements--streets, sewers, etc.--which have been designed to
avoid any serious problems.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 6
3. The project is in substantial conformance with the Chula Vista
General Plan Elements as follows:
a. Land Use - The proposed development at 28 OU's/net acre in
keeping with the land use designation of high density
residential at 13 to 26 DU's/gross acre.
b. Circulation - The project will be served by existing streets and
no streets are required across the site.
c. Housing - The project will provide additional housing and home
ownership opportunity for the residents of the. community.
d. Conservation - The site is located within the urbanized area of
the City and there are no significant animal or plant species on
the property.
e. Park and Recreation, Open Space - The developer is required to
pay a fee in lieu of dedicating and improving parks. The PAD fee
for the4~3~units is~lOn~
f. Seismic Safety - The property is not near any known earthquake
faul ts.
g. Safety - The site is well within the response time of the fire
station located on "F" Street.
h. Noise - The units meet the requirements of the U.B.C.
i. Scenic Highway - The site is not adjacent to a designated scenic
route.
j. Bicycle Routes - The adjacent streets are not deslgna:ed bike
routes but will accommodate bike traffic.
k. Public Buildings - No public buildings are proposed on the
subject property.
4. Pursuant to Section 6641g.2 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
Commission certifies that it has considered the effect of this
approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those
needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City
and the available fiscal and environmental resources.
WPC 0962P/OO14Z
I
I
LS-"L ....
I
I I I- .....
I I I ......
' -I--I- -I- .....
VISTA ~
VANCE: ST.
HIGH '
r .....
I
I
i
ROOSEVELT
I I ~ I I I
I I i~ I ~
I~ .L_~_ --I I I I
I I I I
ADDENDUM TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-81-40
FINDINGS REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF CONDITIONED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-81-40
A. BACKGROUND
The Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista provide
that the Environmental Review Coordinator shall review any significant project
revisions to assure that there will be no potential for significant
environmental impacts which have not been previously evaluated in a Negative
Declaration or Environmental Impact Report. If the ERC finds that a proposed
project is essentially the same in terms of impact or circumstances under
which the project is to be undertaken, the £RC may recommend that a previously
prepared ND/IS or EIR be utilized as the environmental document for the
project.
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project applicant proposes to revise a proposed 8-unit (all 2 bedrooms)
condominium development located at 385-390 'G' Street to a 9-unit (six 2-bedroom
and three 1-bedroom) condominium development. There would be an increase in
the number of on-site parking spaces from 14 to 17, 9 of which are to be garage
spaces.
C. ANALYSIS
1. Soils
Expansive soils have been found to be present in the project area and
a soils report was previously required of the project. There are no
changes in the project that would change this requirement or further
exacerbate the expansive soils problem.
2. Drainage
Changes in the proposed project will not result in any additional
drainage impacts.
3. Aesthetics
The driveway location is essentially the same as the previous project
(IS-81-40), therefore the disposition of existing parkway trees will
not change.
4. Parks
The existing park acreage has not changed since review of the previous
project and the need for park facilities will not change appreciably
with this proposal. No additional mitigation is required.
5. Schools
The proposed project revisions will not result in additional impacts
to local schools not previously addressed in Negative Declaration
IS-81-40. No additional mitigation is required.
D. CONCLUSION
Based on the above discussion, ! hereby find that the proposed 9-unit
condominium project is essentially the same in terms of environmental impact
or circumstances under which it is being undertaken, and recommend that the
Design Review Committee, Planning Commission and City Council adopt Negative
Declaration IS-81-40 prior to taking action on the project, subject to the
mitigation measures specified in the Negative Declaration.
.~ou§las D. Reid~
[n¥ironmental Revie~ Coordinator
negative declaration
PROJECT NAME: Darley Apartments
PROJECT LOCATION: Between 385 and 399 G Street
PROJECT APPLICANT: Thomas Darley 369 K St. #54
Chula Vista, Ca 92010
Case No: IS-81-40 Date: May 14, 1981
A. Project Setting
The project, involves approximately 0.32 acres of property which
is presently vacant and located between 385 and 399 G Street.
Adjaqgnt land uses consist of two single family dwellings to the east
and one single family.dwelling to the west of the site, multiple
family units to the north and multiple family units across G St.
to the south.
The project site is void of any significant wildlife and there are
no significant natural or man-made resource present, although
mature pepper trees are located within the public right-of-way~
between the curb and sidewalk. Expansive soils may be present
on the site and there are no known geologic hazards within the
project vicinity.
B. Project Description
The applicant proposes to construct 8 aDartment units contained
in one two-story structure. Fourteen parking spaces are proposed
i~' addition to appropriate landscape areas.
C. Compatibility with zoning and plans
The proposed project site is zoned R-3 (multiple family) and would
permit a maximum of 9 dwelling units. The applicant is requesting
a variance for the reduction of the front setback for parking
purposes from 20 feet to 18 ft. (measured from the back of sidewalk)
The project is compatible with the General Plan and all associated
elements.
D. Identification of environmental effects
1. Soils
The City Engineering Dept. has indicated that expansive soils
are present in the project area, therefore a soils report
should be prepared and recommendations incorproated into the
project to ensure stable construction.
city of chula vista planning department ~--~
environmental review section
2. Drainage
The increase in the amount of surface runoff which empties
into existing storm drain systems resulting from this project
will be insignificant. It should be noted that future
cumulative development within this drainage basin will
warrant increasing the capacity of existing downstream storm
drain facilities.
3. Aesthetics
The disposition of the mature trees located in the parkway at
the front of the project site shall be coordinated with the
City's Landscape Architect and the City's Street Tree Forman.
All efforts should be made to retain these trees where feasible.
4. Parks
'~he existing park acreage in Park District No. 3 is 8.6 acres,
and the current requirement for this district is 22.4 acres.
The proposed project will generate the need for .03 acres of
parkland which can be satisfied by payment of in-lieu park
fees which will be used for the acquisition and development
of additional park acreage.
5. Schools
The local elementary and junior high schools serving the project
area are currently approaching capacity enrollment. This
project,.~ombined with proposed projects in the same vicinity
will serve to increase enrollment to maximum capacity levels.
The developer shall comply with public facilities policies and
ensure adequate classroom space for new students.
E~' ' Mitigation necessary to avoid significant effects
1. The developer shall not oppose the formation of any
assessment district formed for the purpose of providing
adequate storm drainage facilities to serve the project area.
2. The developer shall coordinate with the City's Landscape
Architect and the City's Street Tree Foreman concerning the
disposition of the existing street trees located on the project
site. Every effort shall be made to retain these trees
where feasible.
(The following measures are standard development regulations
and are advisory only.)
3. A soils report shall be prepared and all recommendations
are to be incorporated into the project.
4. The developer shall provide the city with written
assurance from the school districts that adequate educational
facilities are available for all new students.
F. Findings of insignificant impact
1. The site is void of any natural or man-made resources,
~a~lthough mature trees are existing in the public right-of-way..
4~c~pcsed-mitigation will ensure the proper disposition of the -
existing-trees, Expansive soils may be present, however,
proposed mitigation will ensure stable construction.
2. The PrOPosed residential development is consistent with
the General Plan and associated elements and is not anticipated
to achieve short term to the disadvantage of long term environ-
mental goals.
3. No impacts are anticipated to occur which could interact
to create a substantial cumulative effect on the environment.
4. The project will not cause the emission of any harmful
~bstance or nois~ which could prove hazardous to the health
and welfare of human beings.
G. ' Consultation
1. ' Individuals and organizations
City of Chula Vista Steve Griffin, Assoc. Planner
Roger Daoust, Senior Eng.
~Shabda Roy, Assoc. Eng.
Tom Dyke, Plan Checker
Ted Monsell, Fire Marshal
Duane Bazzel, Asst. Planner
John Nash - Applicants designer
2. 'Documents
IS-81-33 Hoffman/Salganic Condominiums
The Initial Study Application and evaluation forms documenting th~
findings of no significant impact are on file and available for
public hearing at the Chula Vista Planning Dept., 276 4th Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010 - '
ENVIRON~.~NTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR
city of chula vista planning department ~'~1~
environmental review section
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 7
5. PUBLIC HEAJ~ING: Conditional Use Permit PCC-84-21; request to establish
a self-serve gas statlon~ food mart and car wash at
1291 Third Avenue - Texac% Inc.
A. BACKGROUND
1. This item involves a request submitted by Texaco, Inc. to replace an
existing service station located at 1291 Third Avenue in the C-C-P zone with a
self-serve gas station, food mart and automatic car wash.
2. The project is exempt from environmental review as a Class 4(i)
exemption.
B. RECOMMENDATION
1. Based on findings contained in Section "E" of this report, adopt a
motion to approve the request, PCC-84-21, to establish a self-serve gas
station, food mart and automatic car wash at 1291 Third Avenue subject to the
following conditions:
a. The freestanding sign identification sign shall be a monument
sign. Freestanding auxtlary signs shall not exceed 4 feet in
height. The number, type, and location of signs shall be
limited to Design Review Committee approval. The installation
of any signs not approved by DRC shall be grounds for revocation
of the conditional use permit by the Planning Commission.
b. The new driveway on Palomar Street shall be an alley type
approach.
C. DISCUSSION
1. Adjacent zoning and land use.
North C-C-P Vacant
South C-C Commercial center
East C-C-P Single family dwelling
West C-36 (Co.) Commercial
2. Existing site characteristics.
The project site is 20,704 sq. ft. (0.48 acres) parcel located at the
northeast corner of Third Avenue and Palomar Street and is presently
developed with a full-service gas station. There are two driveways
along Third Avenue and one driveway on Palomar Street. The existing
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 8
structure is located in the approximate center of the site with the
covered pump islands (2) on the west side. The properties to the
north and east are lower in elevation and retaining walls have been
erected along those property lines.
3. PropoSed use.
The applicant intends to remove the existing structures on the site
and construct a self-serve gas station, food mart and automatic car
wash. The proposed development will consist of the following:
a. Closing the existing driveway on Palomar Street and constructing
a new driveway near the easterly property line,
b. Two pump islands coverd by a 40'x89' canopy (approximate center
of the site);
c. A food mart structure (12'x44') under the middle of the canopy
which will also have a restroom, storage room and the cashier's
area;
d. An automatic (coin or token operated) car wash structure
(18'x42') along the northerly property line (cars will enter on
the east end and exit on the west end near Third Avenue);
e. A 7'x14' utility building and trash enclosure at the northeast
corner of the site;
f. A vacuum, air and water as well as parking (6 cars) along the
easterly property line; and
g. Landscaping along each street frontage and along each property
line.
The buildings are proposed as a contemporary design with V-grooved
sheet metal siding. The car wash will be a block building covered
with the metal siding. The exterior colors will be a light grey and
a dark grey along the top. The canopy will be black sheet metal.
The establishment will be open 24 hours, 7 days a week. Items sold
will be normal convenience items as well as beer and wine.
The project design and materials will be considered by the Design
Review Committee on May 17, 1984, which is after the time in which
this report will have been prepared. A verbal report of the
Committee's action will be presented at the Planning Commission
meeting.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 9
D. ANALYSIS
The proposed development reflects the recent trend of the major oil
companies toward replacing full-service gas stations with self-serve
operations and mini-markets. Other oil companies are also proposing automatic
(coin-operated) car washes as an incentive to fill-up with gas. This trend
does reduce the automotive repair service level for motorists, but this has
more of an impact at the freeway interchanges than it does in the center of
the city where these services can still be found within close proximity. The
change in operation and the new services will still provide convenience to the
motorists. For this reason the staff recommends that this request be approved.
The staff believes the site plan is well conceived and functions well from
a circulation standpoint. Even though there is an existing single-family
dwelling immediately to the east, the car wash is not expected to be used
frequently and the residence should not be adversely affected. In addition,
the property is zoned for commercial use and will probably be developed as
such in the future.
The DRC will review the architecture and materials of the proposed
structures. The block building with metal siding may be an issue. The
Planning Commission's decision on the matter, however, will concern the
appropriateness of the land use. The number of signs shown on the plan is of
concern to the Planning Department. The size, number, and location tend to
clutter the site. However, the DRC will consider signs as part of the
architectural package. It is recommended that the freestanding identification
pole sign be altered to a monument type.
E. FINDINGS
1. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or desirable to
provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being
of the neighborhood or the commmntty.
Approval of this request will allow the applicant to continue to sell
gasoline at this location and provide additional services to the
motorists.
2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular
case, be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements
in the vicinity.
The subject property is surrounded by commercial properties. The
proposed uses should not affect those uses permitted in those zones.
3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and
conditions specified in the code for such use.
The proposed use meets the regulations of the Code pertaining to this
type of use.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 10
4. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely
affect the general plan of the City or the adopted plan of any government
agency.
The proposed use is in keeping with the commercial designation of the
prope6ty by the General Plan.
WPC 0967P/OO15Z'
KENNEDY ST.
ii
E) []
li~
0 0 o
idl,
[
ll~lllllll ~1 z
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 11
6. PUBLIC HEARING: Modification of conditional use permit, PCC-83-14 for
a 138-bed skilled nursing facility at 751 Dora Lane -
Community Hospital of Chula Vista
A. BACKGROUND
In March 1983, the Planning Commission granted a conditional use permit,
PCC-83-14, for the construction of a 138-bed skilled nursing facility on the
site of the Community Hospital of Chula Vista located at 751 Dora Lane in the
R-1-H zone. The Commission also approved the relocation of the existing
heliport to within 100 feet of the easterly propeFty line.
The applicant has since revised the proposed development plans and is
requesting that the proposed changes be approved.
The Planning Commission has also adopted the Negative Declaration issued
on IS-83-17 on the original project. The Environmental Review Coordinator has
reviewed the initial study and has determined that the information contained
in the document is adequate for the proposed project and has prepared an
addendum to the Negative Declaration for Planning Commission adoption.
B. RECOM~ENDATION
1. Readopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-83-17 and adopt the
addendum to the Negative Declaration which states that the original document
is adequate for the proposed project.
2. Adopt a motion approving the modification to the conditional use
permit, PCC-83-14 subject to the following conditions:
a. The architecture, signing, and site plan for Phase I and II
shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and action.
b. The parking area to the east of the proposed building and the
interior circulation shall be revised so as to permit the
construction of the second phase to occur without requiring
changes to the basic circulation pattern in the parking area.
c. A landscaping and irrigation plan shall be submitted for
approval by the City's Landscape Architect prior to construction.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 12
C. DISCUSSION
Existing Site Characteristics
The Community Hospital site, which totals 17+ acres, is located at the
east side of Dora Lane, approximately 1/4 mile south of Telegraph Canyon
Road. Topographically the site can be described as a knoll with the higl~
point in the approximate center and sloping off to the four sides. The
existing 4-story 131-bed hospital building (approved in 1970) is located on
the high point of the property. There are 254 parking spaces on-site, 197 of
which are required. The site is served by three driveways. The helispot is
located immediately south of the hospital near the emergency entrance.
Approved Development Plans
Development plans were previously approved for the construction of a
single story skilled nursing facility, to be built in two phases (98 beds in
the first phase and 40 beds in the second). The 38,500 sq. ft. structure was
to be constructed in the area presently occupied by the helispot and a parking
area containing 26 spaces located near Dora Lane. The helispot was to be
relocated to within 100 feet of the easterly property line. A new driveway
was proposed at the end of Dora Lane which was to provide access to two
parking areas with a total of 47 spaces. Another 9 parking spaces were
proposed on the north side of the building with access from the most Southerly
existing driveway. The emergency entrance of the hospital is also located on
this driveway.
The rectangular shaped structure had two wings extending to the south (the
easterly wing to be constructed at the second phase). The architectural theme
was contemporary Spanish design featuring a beige stucco exterior and tile
roof. The main building is a four-story structure with a two-tone (beige and
light cream) stucco exterior accented by dark glass windows grouped together.
The main building is rectangular with no tile roof. The two buildings though
not identical were deemed to be compatible.
Revised Plans
The revised plans also proposes a 138-bed skilled nursing faclity to be
contructed in two phases (98 beds in the first phase) in essentially the same
location as previously proposed. The building has been completely redesigned
as has the parking and on-site circulation. The new building is a curved
angular structure with the westerly portion being parallel to the street and
the easterly portion parallel to the southerly property line with a curved
section in between. The first phase will have a floor area of 35,750 sq. ft.
and the second phase approximately 15,000 sq. ft. for a total of 50,750 sq.
ft., an increase of 12,250 sq. ft.
Other changes are as follows:
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1904 Page 13
Parking: The parking has been increased from 56 spaces to 202 spaces with the
bulk of the parking located east of the building. The plan also removes 9
spaces presently located opposite the emergency entrance. A portion of the
driveway and some parking will be eliminated with Phase II construction.
Pedestrian Walkway: An enclosed pedestrian walkway is proposed between the
main hospital and the new facility in the vicinity of the emergency entrance.
Circulation: The existing driveway leading to the emergency entrance will be
closed off from the easterly portion of tile site by the enclosed pedestrian
walkway. Access to the new parking and the rest of the site will be provfded
by a driveway extending from the end of the cul-de-sac along the south and
east sides of the proposed structure and will connect with the existing
driveway.
Architecture: The new building will be of conntemporary design with a beige
stucco exterior and flat roof with parapet walls. (The tile roof has been
deleted.) The entire southerly side of the butlding is a covered veranda with
stucco columns and metal railings between columns. The main entrance (at the
curved portion of the building) will be a covered driveway with cars entering
from the east and existing on the west near the cul-de-sac.
Helispot: The hospital intends to continue the emergency helicopter service;
however, the revised plans do not indicate a new location as details are being
worked out with the Federal Aviation Agency.
D. ANALYSIS
The revised plan has certain similarities to the previously approved
proposal. Each plan consists of a 130-bed skilled nursing facility in two
phases and tile buildings in the same approximate location. The most
significant changes are the architecture, location of the helispot, parking
and on-site circulation.
The staff is of the opinion that the original architectural design with a
tile roof was more pleasing than the proposed design even though it resembles
tile existing hospital. The curved angular structure does offer some visual
relief. The metal railings, however, in between the veranda columns gives the
structure a very institutional appearance. For this reason, the staff
recommends that the building design be carefully reviewed and subject to
Design Review Committee action.
The proposed parking layout and circulation route will' have to be
redesigned for the construction of the second phase. The applicant would have
to submit a new parking and circulation plan before the second phase
construction were allowed to proceed. The revised layout removes 35 existing
parking spaces, whereas the 130-bed facility requires 46 spaces (1 space for
every 3 beds). Therefore, the final parking layout should contain a minimum
of 81 spaces. (Note: 202 are shown.) The proposed parking and circulation
system should be designed to accommodate both Phase I and Phase II of const-
ruction. This would eliminate disruption when the second phase begins.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of Hay 23, 1984 Page 14
The revised plan precludes the heltspot to be located in the area 100 feet
west of the easterly property line and if this service is to be continued, it
will have to be relocated elsewhere on the hospital site. Until the applicant
resolves certain issues with the FAA, the decision on the helispot will have
to be deferred and decided upon at a later date.
WPC 0974P
Cify 01' Chulo Visfa
VACANT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
(SITE)
Vac ! vac
!
coneamaTV
HOSPITAL
( R-I ) ~,,,,,~,
Country ~C1~4/
~ ~ ' PROdE~
~ of~
ADDENDUM TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-83-17
FINDINGS REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-83-17
A. BACKGROUND
The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista provide
that the Environmental Review Coordinator shall review any significant project
revisions to ensure that there will be no potential or significant
environmental impacts which have not been previously evaluated in a Negative
Declaration or Environmental Impact Report. If the ERC finds that a proposed
project is essentially the same in terms of impact or circumstances under
which the project is to be undertaken, the ERC may recommend that a previously
prepared ND/IS or EIR be utilized as an environmental document for the project.
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project applicant proposes to construct a 138-bed (98 beds in Phase I)
one-story skilled nursing facility south of the existing Chula Vista Community
Hospital. A total of 202 parking spaces are proposed, in addition to the
elimination or relocation of the existing hell-stop. A previous proposal
consisted of a 138-bed facility, the relocation of the heli-stop and the
provision for 56 parking spaces.
C. ANALYSIS
1. Geology
The project site is known to be underlain with fault traces of the La
Nacion Fault system. A geotechnical investigation was previously required for
the project, and there have been no changes that would alter this requirement.
2. Noise
The relocation of the hell-stop has not been precisely mapped with
the proposed project; therefore, additional environmental review will be
required prior to any approvals for the relocation of the hell-stop.
3. Transportation
The revised project is in essentially the same location as the
original project and the access will again be from the end of Dora Lane. No
additional impacts are anticipated with the revised project.
D. CONCLUSIONS
The proposed revisions to the project involve a slight relocation of the
proposed nursing facility and an increase in parking that will serve both the
proposed facility and the existing hospital. Mitigation contained in Negative
Declaration IS-83-17 will still apply as conditions surrounding the
development of this proposal have not changed.
WPC 0964P
,, mitig.a. . --
negative declarabon
PROJECT NAME: South Bay Community Convalescent Hospital
PROJECT LOCATION: 751 Dora Lane, Chula Vista
PROJECT APPLICANT: Community Hospital of Chula Vista 751 Dora Lane
Chula Vista, CA 92010
CASE NO: IS-83-17 DATE: February 25, 1983
A. ~roject Setting
The project site consists of 17.24 acres containing Chula Vista Community
Hospital and an accessory helistop pad. Various parking lot areas are
located throughout the hospital campus in addition to'mature landscaping.
Adjacent land uses consists of medical offices (under construction) to the
west and vacant property to the east, north and south.
Portions of the LaNacion Fault System traverse the hospital campus in a
north/south trend (Woodward-Gizienski and Associates, 1973).
There are no endangered plant or animal species known to exist on or around
the project site.
B. Project description
The proposed project consists of: 1) the relocation of the.existing heltstop,
northeast of the existing site, 2) construction of a one-story skilled nursing
facility (98 beds in phase I and 40 beds in phase 2) south of the existing hospital,
and 3) the location of new parking, areas containing approximately 56 parking spaces.
C. Compatibility with zoning and plans
The proposed use is compatible with the General Plan designation for professional
and administrative offices. Section 19.58.180 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code
requires that heliports be located no closer than 600 feet from any residential zone.
Although adjacent properties to the east and south are not within the city boundaries
and not zoned, they are designated as "Medium-Density Residential" on the General
Plan. The City Council granted Chula Vista Community Hospital permission in 1973
to operate the helistop at its present location due to the emergency nature and
low frequency of its operation.
Approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission is required
prior to any construction activity on the project.
city of chula vista planning department
environmental review section
IS-83-17
Page 2
D. Identification of environmental effects
1. Geology
The project site is located in the vicinity of a branch of the LaNacion Fault
System. Chula Vista Community Hospital, which is located to the north of the
proposed project, experienced geotechnical difficulties during the original
construction activities. A geotechnical report, prepared by Woodward-Giztenski and
Associates in 1973, verified the presence of north/south trending fault traces
which necessitated moving the hospital approximately 60 feet to the west of its
original site. Studies and test trenches performed at that time did not include
the project area. Based on information contained in the geotechnical report, there
is reason to. believe that fault traces could be traversing the proposed
project site. Further studies should be performed on the project site with
recommendations to be incorporated into the project which will reduce potential
impacts to a level of insignificance.
2. Noise
The project involves the relocation of the existing helistop, utilized presently
for emergency situations and transfer operations. The present helistop is located
390 feet from the east property line and 379 feet from the south property line. The
approved ingress/egress is from the south and from the west. Easterly access has
been denied by action of the Chula Vista City Council due to adjacent residentially
designated property.
The proposed helistop location is within approximately 100 feet of the east
property line. Noise levels associated with the use of helicopters could reach
90-95 dB at the easterly property line. Present noise levels are estaimated at
approximately 80 dB at the easterly property line. At ~resent, noise levels are
not considered a significant impact on adjacent properties since they are undeveloped.
Relocation of the helistop to the proposed location will not result in a
significant noise impact on adjacent undeveloped property, but could result in a
potentially significant impact upon any future residential development within
300 feet of the easterly property line. Use of the helistop should be discontinued
at the proposed location upon development of the adjacent residential property to
the east. Continued use or relocation at that time would be subject to further
environmental analysis.
3. Transportation
Each project along Dora Lane will have cumulative impacts on Telegraph Canyon
Road. The City's Engineering Department will require that the project proponent
sign an agreement not to oppose the formation of a reimbursement district for the
future improvement of Telegraph Canyon Road.
EIR-76-6, Chula Vista Medical Facilities, prepared in 1976, provides discussion
on the development surrounding the hospital and impacts to Dora Lane and Brandywine
Avenue. The following table will show a comparison between impacts discussed in
the EIR and impacts resulting from project implementation.
IS-83-17
Page 3
TRAFFIC GENERATION
EIR-76-6 Approved and proposed ADT
Hospital 2,985 Hospital 2,985
Medical Offices 3,750 Medical Offices 3,570
Convalescent facility 375 Convalescent facility 373
(198 beds) {138 beds)
Psychiatric facility 186
Total ADT 7,110 Total ADT 7,114
The cumulative results of the approved and proposed uses differs a total of
four vehicle trips per day, thereby affirming the accuracy of data contained in
EIR-76-6.
E. Mitigation measures necessary to avoid significant effects
1. A geotechnical investigation shall be performed for the proposed project
prior to any grading operations. Recommendations from this investigation shall
be incorporated into the project.
2. Use of the relocated helistop shall be discontinued upon development of
any residential land use within 300 feet of the easterly property line. Continued
use or further relocation of the helistop at that time will be subject to further
environmental analysis.
3. The owner of the project shall sign an agreement not to oppose the formation
of a reimbursement district for the future improvement of Telegraph Canyon Road.
F. Findings of insignficant impact
1. The project site is void of any natural or manmade resources. Proposed
mitigation will reduce potential seismic, noise and traffic impacts to a level of
insignificance.
2. The proposed skilled nursing facility is in basic conformance with the
Land Use Element of the General Plan and will not achieve short term to the
disadvantage of long term goals.
3. As noted above, all impacts can be mitigated and none are anticipated to
occur which could interact to create a substantial cumulative effect on the
environment.
4. Construction of the skilled nursing facility and relocation of the existing
helistop will not result in any significant increase in vehicle traffic nor will
any hazards to human beings result.
IS-83-17
Page 4
G. Consultation
1. Individuals and organizations.
City of Chula Vista: Steve Griffin, Associate Planner
Duane Bazzel, Assistant Planner
Roger Daoust, Senior Engineer
Chuck Glass, Traffic Engineer
Ted )ionsell, Fire Marshal
Tom Dyke, Building Department
Applicant's Agent: Charles R. Coon
2. Documents.
EIR-76-6, Chula Vista Medical Facilities
IS-81-8, Vista Hill Hospital
PCC-73-1, Community Hospital of Chula Vista
PCC-83-14, Community Hospital of Chula Vista
The Initial Study application and evaluation forms documenting the findings of
no significant impact are on file and available for public hearing at the Chula
Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
REVIEW COORDINATOR
city of chula vista planning department
environmental review section
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 15
7. Consideration of revocation of home occupation permit at 724 Nolan
AVenue - Lauro R. Parra
A. BACKGROUND
On March 24, 1983, a home occupation permit was approved and a business
license issued to Lauro L. Parra permitting an office for property management
within the residence located at 724 Nolan Avenue in the R-1 zone based on the
condition that all phone calls were to be received only within the home.
Prior to and since approval of the homa occupation permit, the Zoning
Enforcement Officer has received numerous neighborhood complaints that Mr.
Parra was conducting his business within an accessory building at the rear of
the home contrary to the condition of approval. Attempts to have Mr. Parra
comply have been unsuccessful prompting the Zoning Enforcement Officer to
request that the Planning .Commission consider the matter for appropriate
corrective action.
B. RECC)MMENDATION
After receiving public testimony, the Planning Commission has the
following options:
1. Give the permittee a certain amount of time in whch to comply with
the condition of the home occupation permit; or
2. Allow business calls to be received within the accessory building; or
3. Revoke the home occupation permit and instruct the permittee to cease
and desist conducting a business on the premises.
The Planning Department recommends that the permit be revoked and that
business cease and desist within seven days.
C. DISCUSSION
Prior to being issued a home occupation permit and business license to
conduct an office within the home, Mr. Parra had been illegally operating a
business from the 'home for some time. The City became aware of the violation
after receiving complaints from the neighbors concerning disturbances caused
by the use of telephones within the accessory building.
When Mr. Parra applied for a home occupation permit the Planning
Department sent him a letter on October 25, 1982 (see attached) informing him
that the permit would only be approved if all business calls were received in
the residence and not in the accessory building. The letter also indicated
that he could appeal this decision to the Planning Commission.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of May 23, 1984 Page 16
On February 8, 1983, the Zoning Officer sent Mr. Parra a letter indicating
that he cease conducting business within ten days. It was after this letter
was sent that Mr. Parra accepted the condition of approval and the home
occupation permit was issued. As indicated earlier in this report, Mr. Parra
continues to receive calls within the accessory structure. It should be noted
that Mr. Parra is conducting an office for a trucking business in Mexico
rather than property management as stated on the permit and business license.
The type of business is not at issue as long as the home is used only as an
office (mailing and phone calls).
There appears to be a reluctance on the part of Mr. Parra to conduct his
business in the manner stipulated. It also appears that he will comply only
after numerous attempts have been made on the part of the City's Zoning
Enforcement Officer. The Zoning Enforcement Officer has indicated that other
violations have also occurred such as having employees working on the premises
and commercial vehicles parked in the residential area. However, the actual
times have not been documented. The Police Department has been called out
regarding commercial vehicles parked in the residential area.
D. CONCLUSION
A home occupation permit is granted to an applicant with the stipulation
and understanding that the business will be conducted in such a manner so as
to not cause additional traffic and noise in the residential area which would
be disruptive to adjacent homeowners. If after reviewing the public testimony
on this item the Planning Commission is unable to make such a finding, the
home occupation permit should be revoked.
WPC 0968P
CT.
DR.
October 25, ]g82
Nr. Lauro Parra
724 ;iolan Ayenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Subject: Proposed ',.ion,~e r, ccur~atian Permit for residence located at
724 ;~ol'~n Avenue
Dear Hr. ?arra:
The ?lannio:n D.,o~'r~ent has r.~vie,,-~e:( 'j~,ur a~plica~ion for a ;(omc Occupation
Pemit fer your r~si,Jenc~ a~ 7].$ qolJq ,z, venu~. Zt is noted :hat you are
proacsin~ ~o op~r~:ce ,z :rucki,:c complain, L'.~i'~e:;s ~Ffic:~ from ?dthin a detached
structure iocat]d :.~J;ir:.~ ]'c'Jr ,.:t.,elli; ,.
The City Zonin~ En~orcer:e~: :?f',=ic~r, '~r. :!OM '-red,re, has referred to our Depart-
merit that you ',)ay,) ~eeq c~ncuctin; t,~is ,J;e illeqall'/ )ver t'ne nest few months.
During this perio~ ,Jr Cin'e ,;e }~as received cor,;::,iai:tcs from your neiehbors
concernMq !isturb~.~css cc~,~ed b,,' ~u us~ o: Z~ e ~:)leo,mne ir~ the accessory
structure.
RegulaCions in th) zoni,~r: ]rJinance for ,~'n~ ~ccu~aCi,~n'?e~its do no~ allow
activiCies ~nd nois~ whic; are in ,~xce,~] oF C;a~ associated ~,:ith a ~sidential
use. Therefore, ';asJd co ~;he c~::piaints Fil,~d with th~ citv, the Planning
Depar~ent canncC anprov] ~,,cur cpplicatiDn Sar t:~e use of t~e detached structure
In the rear oF your ~ro~erty.
If yo~i wish to ;x~rsue t~':) 'Jse off tJ~is ~uil,Jin~ al an office, you may file an
appeal in writina to the L'ianning (lommission." The lea for processing an appeal
is $250.00. [(owever, if you wish to limit your r, ctivities and telephone opera-
tions to your prirarv dwelling, a oermit can be issued immediately upon your
request. ?opefully. Yae :~oise Sroi~ the activity will not have as great an impact
on your nei ,hbcrs.
If you relocate '/our )Dnincss activities insi,qe your heuse and co~plaints are
subsequen~l/ fi)ed with the city, your Uome Czcup~tien would be subject to
review by the Planning Cor~dssion.
If you have any questions olease contact ;ne at phone number 575-5101.
Respectfu)ly yours,
;(orman Ostapinski
Plannin~ Technician
cc: Robert Sanchez, 590 "G" Street, StJite ~6, Chula Vista, CA 92010
Roy Hedge