HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/1984/03/14 AGENDA
City Planning Commission
Chula Vista, California
Wednesday, March 14, 1984 - 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - SILENT PRAYER
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of revised development plan
for lots 324 and 325 of Hidden Vista
Village (Windjammer Condos), PCM-80-13-B,
Financial Scene, Inc.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of tentative subdivision map
for Appel Subdivision, Chula Vista Tract 84-3,
Appel Development Corporation
3. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of tentative subdivision map
for Le Trianon, Chula Vista Tract 84-4,
The Wiechers Corporation
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
COMMISSION COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT AT to the Regular Business Meeting of March 28, 1984
at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
TO: City Planning Commission
FROM: George Krempl, Director of Planning
SUBJECT: Staff report on agenda items for Planning Commission
Meeting of March 14, 1984
1. PUBLIC HEARING: PCM-80-13-B Consideration of revised development
~lan for lots 324 and 325 of Hidden Vista Village
(blindjammer Condos) - Financial Scene, Inc.
A. BACKGROUND
This item involves consideration of a revised plan for the development of
lots 324 and 325 of the Hidden Vista Village Subdivision with a lO0-unit
condominium project to be known as The Windjammer. The proposed project
is located at the northwest quadrant of East "H" Street and Hidden Vista
Drive within the Rice Canyon Sectional Planning Area of the E1 Rancho del
Rey Specific Plan.
The Environmental Impact Report, EIR-79-8, for the Hidden Vista Village
development was previously certified by the Planning Commission and City
Council. On February 2, 1984, the Environmental Review Coordinator found
that the information contained in EIR-79-8 was adequate for the proposed
project and satisfied CEQA review requirements and recommended that the
Planning Commission recertify the EIR, noting that they will consider the
information in the report as they reach a decision on the project.
B. RECOMMENDATION
1. Recertify EIR-79-8 with the notation that the information in the
report was considered.
2. Adopt a motion recommending that the City Coucil adopt a resolution
approving the revised development plan for lots 324 and 325 of the
Hidden Vista Village subdivision subject to the following conditions:
a. An adjustment plat shall be processed to change the line between
lots 324 and 325. Although not required, subsequent to
recordation of new deeds corresponding to the adjusted lines we
recommend that a record of survey be filed so that monuments can
be placed in the field at the new lot corners.
b. All easements for sewer and access granted to the City on Map
10051 shall be vacated if they no longer correspond to alignment
of the private road (Fossil Circle).
c. A new grading permit is required and the existing grading,
landscape and irrigation plans revised.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for the Meeting of March 14, 1984 Page 2
d. Improvement plans shall require revision reflecting sewer,
drainage and other facility changes.
e. New sewer and access easements shall be granted to the City.
f. Final site plan and architectural details shall be subject to
Zoning Adminstrator approval upon application for building
permits.
C. DISCUSSION
Approved SPA Plan
In 1980, the City Council approved the Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan
for the Rice Canyon area of the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan as well as
the tentative map for the Hidden Vista Village subdivision encompassing
the entire SPA area. Also, approved at that time was the development
proposal for lots 324 and 325 (approximately 9.3 acres) with a 102-unit
condominium project.
The development proposal consisted of a combination of four-plexes,
six-plexes, and eight-plexes. Approximately two-thirds of the units were
to be three-bedroom units with remaining one-third two-bedroom units. The
units were to be served by a private loop street with access from Hidden
Vista Drive. The buildings on the periphery of the property were
three-story split-level units and the interior structures two-stories in
height. The buildings within the interior were served by private
cul-de-sac streets.
All the units on the periphery were to have a one-car garage and one open
parking space. The interior units were to have a two-car garage. The
guest parking was to be located within parking bays located on the inside
of the loop street.
The architectural styling of the buildings was of contemporary design with
stucco exteriors, wood trim and balconies, and either shake shingle or
mission tile roofs.
Revised Development Plan
The applicant has submitted a revised plan for the development of the two
lots which will contain 100 units instead of the 102 units as originally
proposed. The reduction is partially due to the change in the basic
structure type. The revised plan consists of 28 duplexes and ll
four-plexes to be developed in two phases.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for the Meeting of l~arch 14, 1984 Page 3
The following is a breakdown of the proposed project:
1. There will be four basic floor plans:
Unit 8~R Size Number Stories Parkin9
1 2 960 S.F. l0 1 1 or 2 car garage **
2 2 ll6 S.F. 36 2* 1 or 2 car garage **
3 3 1380 S.F. 28 2* 2 car garage
4 3 1484 S.F. 26 2* 2 car garage
* Townhouse
** Plus one assigned open space for one-car garage units of which there
will be a total of 15 one-car garages.
2. Phasing
Phase I Phase II
(Lot 324) (Lot 3851 Total
Duplexes 12 16 28
Four-plexes 7 4 ll
Unit 1 6 4 l0
Unit 2 20 16 36
Unit 3 14 14 28
Unit 4 12 14 26
Total Units 52 48 100
3. Parking
Spaces Phase I Phase II Total
Two-car garage 84 {42 garages) 86 (43 garages) 170 (85 garages)
One-car garage l0 5 15
Assigned open space l0 5 15
Guest parking 30 12 42
Total 134 108 242
Note:Required parking per R-3 regulations - 212 spaces
Assigned parking ratio: 2 to 1
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for the Meeting of March 14, 1984 Page 4
4. Miscellaneous
a. There will be a swimming pool (Phase I) and a restroom/storage
building in the center of the project.
b. Perimeter fencing will be a 4-foot high fabric/wire mesh (black)
with wood supports and railings.
c. Each unit will have a private patio area defined by a 3-1/2 foot
high wall.
5. Architecture
The architecture of the proposed buildings is of contemporary design
with a combination of stucco and wood siding exteriors, shake shingle
roofs and wood trim and garage doors. Colors will be earth tones,
light brown, beige and grey.
D. ANALYSIS
The applicant has indicated that the revised plan is necessary to meet
present market demands in that the buyers are seeking more individual
privacy which is better accomplished by the duplex and four-plex concept
rather than the four, six, and eight unit structures as originally
proposed.
The change in structure type has resulted in the loss of two units in
order to achieve a desired separation between structures {approximately l0
feet minimum} and a minimum setback of 22 feet from the private street to
the face of the garage (all straight-in garages).
Another significant change is the elimination of the three-story split
level structures along the periphery of the project to two-story townhouse
units. Since the first floor of these units is level, the grading concept
will be changed slightly. The developer has been able to move the
structures back further from the top of slope which extends down to the
adjoining streets. This should result in a softer and less bulky
appearance of the project from the street.
The project meets all of the condominium requirements relating to private
storage (end unit has a garage), private open space (patios} and parking.
In fact, the parking of two spaces per unit exceeds present requirements.
The 42 guest parking spaces should be adequate.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for the Meeting of March 14, 1984 Page 5
E. CONCLUSION
Except for a reductior~ in the total number of units from 102 to 100 units,
the revised development plan is similar to the original proposal with
respect to circulation and architectural styling. The revised plan,
however, will not be as massive in appearance due to the elimination of
the three-story buildings on the periphery, a greater setback from the top
of slope and the change in structure type to duplexes and four-plexes
instead of the larger structures as originally proposed. It is,
therefore, appropriate to recommend approval of the revised plan.
WPC 0808P
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for meeting of March 14, 1984 Page 6
2. PUBLIC HEARING: PCS-84-3 - Consideration of tentative subdivision map
for Appel Subdivision - Chula Vista Tract 84-3 - Appel
Development Corporation
A. BACKGROUND
1. The applicant has submitted a tentative subdivision map known as
Appel Subdivision, Chula Vista Tract 84-3, in order to develop a one lot
condominium project consisting of 44 units on a 1.51 acre parcel located
between the 500 block of Casselman and "D" Streets, 200 feet east of Broadway
in the R-3 zone.
2. An Initial Study, IS-83-26, of possible adverse environmental impacts
of the project was conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator on June
2, 1983. The Environmental Review Coordinator concluded that there would be
no significant environmental effects and recommended adoption of the Negative
Declaration.
B. RECOMMENDATION
1. Find that this project will have no significant environmental impacts
and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-83-26.
2. Based on the findings contained in Section "E" of this report, adopt
a motion recommending that the City Council approve the tentative
subdivision map for Appel Subdivision, Chula Vista Tract 84-3,
subject to the following condition:
a. The developer shall obtain a construction permit prior to
approval of the final map for following work which shall be
completed within one year from the date the permit issued:
1) Removal of the existing driveway on Casselman Street and
replacement with curb and gutter.
2) Removal and replacement of broken sidewalk along Casselman
Street.
3) Construction of driveway approaches on "D" Street and
Casselman Street.
4) Construction of two type "A" outlets per Regional Standard
Drawing D-25 on Casselman and "D" Streets.
5) Installation of two lO0-watt HPS street lights; one on
Casselman Street and one on "D" Street.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for meeting of March 14, 1984 Page 7
C. DISCUSSION
1. Adjacent zoning and land use.
North R-3 Apartments and single family dwellings
South C-T & R-3 Commercial and apartments
East R-3 Apartments
West R-3 Apartments
2. Existing site characteristics.
The subject property is a level and vacant 1.5 acre rectangular
through lot (frontage on two streets) located between Casselman and "D"
Streets (500 block) and 200 feet east of Broadway. The property has 251 feet
of frontage along both streets and a distance between streets of 262 feet.
Both streets are fully improved with curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and
street paving. Some of the sidewalk is broken and needs replacing. Casselman
Street has a 60 foot wide right-of-way with a 36 foot traveled, 6 foot wide
parkway and 5 foot sidewalk. The right-of-way of "D" Street is 80 feet wide
with a 40 foot traveled way, a 13 foot parkway and 5 foot sidewalk. The
property line is located 12 feet back from the face of curb on Casselman
Street and 20 feet on "D" Street.
3. Proposed development.
The proposed development consists of 44 two-bedroom units in six
two-story buildings. There will be five eight-unit structures and one
four-plex. All of the units will have the required private open space in the
form of patios or balconies. The private storage requirement will be located
adjacent to the private open space.
Parking for 74 cars will be provided on-site, 44 of which will be
carports located on the east and west sides of the property. There will be 7
compact spaces and 1 handicap space. Access will be provided by two driveways
on each street. There will be no through traffic from each street except for
emergency vehicles. Other amenities include a laundry room and jacuzzi.
Architecturally, the buildings will be contemporary Spanish design
with mission tile roofs, stucco exteriors and stucco pop-outs around the
windows. The project was approved by the Design Review Committee on
December 15, 1983. In addition, building permits have been issued on the
project and construction has begun.
4. Tentative map.
The tentative subdivision map is for the sole purpose of selling the
units as condominiums. The development meets all of the condominium
requirements of the Code regarding storage, parking, and private open space
and has been approved by the Design Review Committee.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for meeting of March 14, 1984 Page 8
D. FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the tentative
subdivision map for Appel Subdivision, Chula Vista Tract 84-3, is found to be
in conformance with the various elements of the City's General Plan based on
the following:
1. The site is physically suitable for the residential development and
the proposal conforms to all standards established by the City for
such projects.
2. The design of the subdivision will not affect the existing
improvements -- streets, sewers, etc. -- which have been designed to
avoid any serious problems.
3. The project is in substantial conformance with the Chula Vista
General Plan Elements as follows:
a. Land Use - The proposed development is in keeping wi th the land
use designation of high density residential at 13 to 26
DU's/acre.
b. Circulation - The project will be served by existing streets and
no streets are required across the site.
c. Housing - The project will provide additional housing and home
ownership opportunity for the residents of the community.
d. Conservation - The site is located within the urbanized area of
the City and there are no significant animal or plant species on
the property.
e. Park and Recreation, Open Space - The developer is required to
pay a fee in lieu of dedicating and improving parks.
f. Seismic Safety - The property is not near any known earthquake
faults.
g. Safety - The site is well within the response time of the fire
station located on "F" Street.
h. Noise - The units meet the requirements of the U.B.C.
i. Scenic Highway - The site is not adjacent to a designated scenic
route.
j. Bicycle Routes - The adjacent streets are not designated bike
routes but will accommodate bike traffic.
k. Public Buildings No public buildings are proposed on the
subject property.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for meeting of March 14, 1984 Page 9
4. Pursuant to Section 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
Commission certifies that it has considered the effect of this
approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those
needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City
and the available fiscal and environmental resources.
WPC 078gP/OO14Z
negative declaration
PROJECT NAME: Casselman Condominiums
PROJECT LOCATION: 1.5 acre vacant parcel west of 560 Casselman Street
PROJECT APPLICANT: Appel Development Corporation
5797 Chesapeake Court, Suite I
San Diego, CA
CASE NO: IS-83-26 DATE: June 3, 1983
A. Project Settin9
The project site consists of 1.5 acres of relatively flat vacant property
with approximately 251 feet of frontage on both Casselman Street and "D"
Street.
Adjacent land uses consist of multiple family units on the east and west
sides of the project, multiple family units across "D" Street to the south
and multiple and single family units across Casselman Street to the north.
There are no endangered plant or animal species located on or near the
project site and no geologic hazards are known to exist in the project
vicinity.
B. Project Description
The proposed project consists of the construction of 45 residential
condominiums with a total of 75 on-site parking spaces.
C. Compatibilit~ with Zonin9 and ~lans
The proposed project will result in a net density of 29.74 units per acre
which is consistent with current R-3 zoning and "high density residential"
land use designation of the General Plan.
D. Identification of Environmental Effects/Mitigation
The following environmental effect can be mitigated to a level of
insignificance through standard development requirements:
Schools - The present enrollment levels at Feaster Elementary School and
~F~-]~---Vista Junior High School serving the project area, are above
capacity. Implementation of the proposed project may result in the need
for additional classroom space. A letter from each school district,
indicating the adequacy of school facilities shall be required prior to
the issuance of any permits for additional dwelling units.
city of chula vista planning department
environmental review section
E. Findings of Insignificant Impact
1. The site is void of any significant natural or manmade resources and
there are no geological hazards on or near the project site.
Standard development requirements will reduce impacts to a level of
insignificance.
2. The residential proposal is consistent with the General Plan and
associated elements and is not anticipated to achieve short term to
the disadvantage of long term environmental goals.
3. No impacts are anticipated to occur which could interact to create a
substantial cumulative effect on the environment.
4. The project will not cause the emission of any harmful substance or
noise which could prove detrimental to the health and welfare of
human beings.
G. Consultation
1. Individuals and Organizations
City of Chula Vista: ~Steve Griffin, Associate Planner
Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer
Ted Monsell, Fire Marshall
Tom Dyke, Building Inspector
Duane Bazzel, Assistant Planner
Applicant's Designer: Kevin Knox
2. Documents
IS-82-32, Bergh Condominiums
WPC 0357P
EN 6 (Rev. 12/82)
The Initial Study application and evaluation forms documenting the findings of
no significant impact are on file and available for public review at the Chula
Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
£NVI RO~lg[ R£VI£W COORDI~AIOR
city of chula vista planning department
e~vtronmental review section
EN 6 (Rev. 12/82)
STRE VALE CT.
' I ~, , I I
~ MC INTOSH '' ~ ST.
ST.
I I I
I ~ I'r~ I M~'i MF
I
"D" Street
I
MF IiMF
:l i~l I , SF
i i i I 1
~ ' I I
-* [,, , ''
,, ~,
I II I I I · I I I
I ~ I I I '1 ~
FLOWER
I I
~NORTH
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of March 14, 1984 Page 10
3. PUBLIC HEARING Consideration of tentative subdivision map for Le
Trianon Chula Vista Tract 84-4 - The Wiechers
Corporation
A. BACKGROUND
1. The applicant has submitted a tentative subdivision map known as Le
Trianon, Chula Vista Tract 84-4 in order to develop a one lot condominium
project containing nine units on a 14,500 sq. ft. parcel located at 330 "G"
Street in the R-3 zone.
2. An Initial Study, IS-81-50, of possible adverse environmental impacts
of the project was conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator in
February 1983. The Environmental Review Coordinator concluded that there
would be no significant environmental effects and recommended adoption of the
Negative Declaration.
B. RECOMMENDATION
1. Find that this project will have no significant environmental impacts
and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-81-50.
2. Based on the findings contained in Section "E" of this report, adopt
a motion recommending that the City Council approve the tentative
subdivision map for Le Trianon, Chula Vista Tract 84-4, subject to
the following conditions:
a. The developer shall remove and reconstruct the sidewall, curb
and gutter along the entire frontage of the subject property.
b. The developer shall construct a driveway approach per Chula
Vista standards.
C. DISCUSSION
1. Adjacent zoning and land use.
North R-3 Apartments and duplexes
South R-3 Apartments
East R-3 Apartments (15 units)
West R-3 Apartments (14 units)
2. Existing site characteristics.
The subject property is a 50' x 290' level parcel located in the south
side of "G" Street between Third and Fourth Avenues. The site was
formerly developed with an older single family dwelling. However, the
nine-unit project is presently under construction.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of March 14, 1984 Page 11
3. Proposed development.
The development will be a 9-unit condominium project consisting of 3
two-story residential structures connected by carports. Each residential
structure will have three units; one single bedroom unit at ground level
and 2 two-bedroom units above. The upper units will project over the
access driveway located on the east side of the site. There will be 15
off-street parking spaces; lO spaces in carports and 5 open spaces located
at the rear of the property. One guest space is provided at the curb.
The project meets the condominium requirements regarding parking, private
open space and private storage. The lower units will have patios (62 sq.
ft.) and the upper units will have 6'xlO' balconies. The roof of the
carports is also designed to be used for open space. The storage for the
lower units will be located under the stairs and upper units will have
attic storage with access provided by pull-down stairs.
The buildings are of contemporary architectural design with a stucco
exterior, composition roof shingles and wood trim. The project was
reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee in August 1983.
D. FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the tentative
subdivision map for Le Trianon, Chula Vista Tract 84-4, is found to be in
conformance with the various elements of the City's General Plan based on the
following:
1. The site is physically suitable for the residential development and
the proposal conforms to all standards established by the City for
such projects.
2. The design of the subdivision will not affect the existing
improvements -- streets, sewers, etc. -- which have been designed to
avoid any serious problems.
3. The project is in substantial conformance with the Chula Vista
General Plan Elements as follows:
a. Land Use - The sale of multiple family units as condominiums
does not affect the Land Use Element.
b. Circulation - The project is served by an existing street.
c. Housing - The conversion will increase the City's housing stock
and will provide additional opportunity for home ownership.
d. Conservation - The property has been previously developed with a
home of no historic significance.
City Planning Commission
Agenda Items for Meeting of March 14, 1984 Page 12
e. Park and Recreation, Open Space - The developer is required to
pay a fee in lieu of dedicating and improving parks.
f. Seismic Safety - The property is not near any known earthquake
faults.
g. Safety - The site is well within the response time of the fire
station located on "F" Street.
h. Noise - The units are designed to meet the requirements of the
U.B.C. regarding noise attenuation.
i. Scenic Highway - The site is not adjacent to a designated scenic
route.
j. Bicycle Routes - "G" Street is not a designated bike route.
k. Public Buildings No public buildings are designated on the
site.
4. Pursuant to Section 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
Commission certifies that it has considered the effect of this
approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those
needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City
and the available fiscal and environmental resources.
WPC 0779P/OO14Z
ADDENDUM A TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-81-50
FINDINGS REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF CONDITIONED NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-81-50
A. BACKGROUND
The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista provide that the
Environmental Review Coordinator shall review any significant project revisions
to ensure that there will be no potential or significant environmental impacts
which have not been previously evaluated in a negative declaration or environ-
mental impact report. If the ERC finds that a proposed project is essentially
the same in terms of impact or circumstances under which the project is to be
undertaken, the ERC may recommend that a previously prepared ND/IS or EIR be
utilized as an environmental document for the project.
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project applicant proposes to construct a nine-unit apartment/condominium
project which will include a total of 15 on-site parking places, l0 of which
will be carport spaces. Two previous projects have been proposed on the
project site at 330 "G" Street; (1) an eight-unit condominium and (2) a twelve-
unit senior citizen project.
The zoning ordinance will allow a maximum of nine multiple-family units on this
site.
C. ANALYSIS
1. Soils.
Expansive soils have been found to be present in the project area and a
soils report was previously required of the project. There are no changes
in the project that would change this requirement or further exacerbate
the expansive soils problem.
2. Drainage.
The proposed development, as well as the previous proposals, will result
in a minor increase in drainage. The difference in runoff between the
projects would be indistinguishable. As was previously noted, there is
a potential for impact on downstream storm drain facilities due to cumu-
lative development within this drainage basin.
3. Parks.
As was noted in the previously prepared Negative Declaration, the park
area in this project's park district is currently insufficient, however,
a population increase generated by either project would not result in a
significant impact on the ability to provide park and recreational services.
The project, as currently proposed, would result in an increased population
estimate from 16 people to 18 people, or a slight increase in the need for
park facilities from .032 acres to .036 acres. Mitigation will remain the
same.
4. Schools.
The proposed nine-unit project will have essentially the same effect on
local educational facilities as the previous eight-unit proposal. No
additional mitigation will be required.
D. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the above discussion, I hereby find that the proposed nine-unit
apartment/condominium project is essentially the same in terms of environmental
impact or circumstances under which it is being undertaken and recommend that
the Design Review Conmittee, Planning Co~ission and City Council adopt Negative
Declaration IS-81-50 prior to taking action on the project, subject to the miti-
gation measures specified in the Negative Declaration.
Dougla~/D. Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
negative deClaration
PROJECT NAME: Guillemette Condominiums
PROJECT LOCATION: 330 G Street
PROJECT APPLICANT: Louis Guillemette
318 G St., Apt. 5
Chula Vista, Ca 92010
CASE NO: IS-81-50 DATE: June 25, 1981
A. Pro3ect Setting
The project'involves approximately 0.33 acres of property which
presently contains one single family dwelling at 330 G St. Adjacent
land uses consist of multiple family dwellin~ to the west and
east, a duplex and commercial parking lot to the south, and multiple
family dwellings across G St. to the north.
The project site is void of any significant wildlife and there are
no significant natural or man-made resources present. Expansive
soils may be present on the site and there are no known geologic
hazards within the project vicinity.
B. Pro3ect Description
The applicant proposes to construct 8 condominium units contained
in one two-story structure. Fifteen parking spaces are proposed
in addition to appropriate landscaping and private open space.
C. Compatibility with zoning and plans
The proposed project is zoned R-3 (Multiple family) and would permit
a maximum of 9 dwelling units. The project is compatible with the
General Plan and all associated elements.
D. Identification of environmental effects
1. Soils
The City Engineering Dept. has indicated that expansive soils
are present in the project area, therefore a soils report
should be prepared and recommendations incorporated into the
project to ensure stable construction.
city of chula vista planning department
environmental review section
IS-81-50 2
2. Drainage
The increase in the amount of surface runoff which empties
into existing storm drain systems resulting from this project
will be insignificant. It should be noted that future
cumulative development within this drainage basin will
warrant increasing the capacity of existing downstream storm
drain facilities.
3. Parks
The existing park acreage in Park Dist. No. 3 is 8 6 acres,
and the current requirement for this district is 22.4 acres.
The proposed project will generate the need for .03 acres of
parkland which can be satisfied by payment of in-lieu park
fees which will be used for the acquisition and development
of additional park acreage.
4. Schools
The local elementary and junior high schools serving the
project area are'currently approaching capacity enrollment.
This project, combined with proposed projects in the same
vicinity will serve to increase enrollment to maximum capacity
levels. The developer shall comply with public facilities
policies and ensure adequate classroom space for new students.
E. Mitigation necessary to avoid significant effects
1. The developer shall not oppose the formation of any
assessment district formed for the purpose of providing
adequate storm drainage facilities to serve the project area.
(The following measures are standard development regulations
and are advisory only)
2. A soils report shall be prepared and all recommendation
are to be incorporated into the project.
3. The developer shall provide the city with written
assuraDce from the school districts that adequate educational
facilities are available for all new students.
IS-81-50 3
4. Park acquisition and development fees shall be paid
in-lieu of parkland dedication prior to subdivision and
development of the property.
F. Findings of insignificant impact
1. The site is void of any natural or man-made resources,
and there are no geologic hazards present on the site.
Expansive soils may be present on-site, however, proposed
mitigation will ensure stable construction.
2. The proposed residential development is consistent with
the General Plan and associated elements and is not anticipated
to achieve short term to the disadvantage of long term environ-
mental goals.
3. No impacts are anticipated to occur which could interact
to create a substantial cumulative effect on the environment.
4. The project will not cause the emission of any harmful
substance or noise which could prove hazardous to the health
and welfare of human beings.
G. Consultation
1. City of Chula Vista Steve Griffin, Assoc. Planner
Roger Daoust, Senior Eng.
Shabda Roy, Assoc. Eng.
Tom Dyke, Plan Checker
Ted Monsell, Fire Marshal
Duane Bazzel, Asst. Planner
Tom Hyde, Applicants designer
2. Documents
IS-81-40 Darley Apts.
The Initial Study Application and evaluation forms documenting the
findings of no significant impact are on file and available for
public hearing at the Chula Vista Planninq Dept. 276 4th Avenue,
Chula Vista, CA 92010 ' '
ENVIR~ENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR
city of chula vista planning department ~--~
environmental review section
EN 6
I~ I I I II Ii ~ Sho
SF SF SF SF MF TF TF MF
I' I ~ I ~ I MFI ~MF
I I
VANCE
I
SF I
SFIIMF ISF MF IMF
I ~ I '~ ~lih
ROOSEVELT ST
-~ ~-,-- -I ~ I I I ---