HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/1980/08/13 AGENDA
City Planning Commission
Chula Vista, California
Wednesday, August 13, 1980 - 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - SILENT PRAYER
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Meeting of July 23, 1980
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
1. PUBLIC HEARING (cont.): PCZ-80-G - Request to prezone on the north side
at the intersection of Main Street and Maple Drive to
R-3-P-12 - Pacific Engineering
2. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of draft EIR-80-2A for development of
Hilltop Courts
3. PUBLIC HEARING: Request to extend hours of operation of 7-Eleven market
at 1655 A Brandywine to 24 hours per day - Southland Corp.
4. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional use permit PCC-80-21 - Request for expansion of
existing mini-shop at 196 Broadway - Atlantic Richfield Co.
5. PUBLIC HEARING: Tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 80-24,
Brightwood Village, construction of new 9 unit condominium
at 163 Brightwood
6. PUBLIC HEARING: Tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 80-25,
Castle Park Townhomes, conversion of 39 units to condominiums
at 1436 Hilltop Drive
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
COMMISSION COMMENTS
To: City Planning Commission
From: D.J. Peterson, Director of Planning
Subject: Staff report on agenda items for Planning Commission
Meeting of August 13, 1980
1. PUBLIC HEARING (cont.): PCZ-80-G - Request to prezone propert~ on the
north side at the intersection of Main Street and Maple
Drive to R-3-P-12 - Pacific Engineering
BACKGROUND
This public hearing has been continued on two previous occasions at the
request of the applicant. The applicant has decided to prepare a precise plan
and is therefore requesting another continuance to allow staff time to evaluate
and process the plan in conjunction with the rezoning request.
RECO~m~ENDATION
Continue the public hearing to the Planning Commission meeting of
September 10, 1980.
City Planning Commission Page 2
Agenda Items for Meeting of August 13, 1980
2. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of draft EIR-80-2A for development of Hilltop Courts
A. BACKGROUND
This EIR evaluates a proposed zone change from R-1 to R-3-P-23 for the
property located between Nacion Avenue and 1-805 to the north of the neighborhood
commercial center on Telegraph Canyon Road. On November 20, 1979 the City Council
amended the General Plan land use designation for this site from Visitor Commercial
to High Density Residential (13-26 DU/Ac.). This proposed zone is within that
General Plan density range.
The Environmental Review Committee issued the Draft EIR on July 3, 1980 for
public review. The only comments received prior to the preparation of this staff
report were from the Environmental Control Commission and they are attached for
your review.
B. RECO~4ENDATION
Open the public hearing, take testimony on the adequacy of the Draft EIR,
close the hearing and schedule consideration of the final EIR for August 27, 1980.
C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1. The proposed project would include 171 one and two bedroom dwelling units
in two and three story structures. About 250 parking spaces would be provided
onsite as well as recreational facilities and landscaped open space.
2. The applicant has indicated that the one-half acre C-N zoned parcel
located in the southwest corner of the site will be withdrawn from the request.
This will not increase the number of dwelling units but will increase the density
from 20.65 dwelling units per acre to about 22. This is below the requested 23
dwelling units per acre zone category. This will not result in any significant
change in the environmental analysis. The text and figures of the final EIR will
be changed to reflect the modification.
D. ANALYSIS
1. Geology.
The two small faults located on the site have been examined by a geologist.
These faults offset material about three million years old and are therefore not
considered active and do not pose a significant hazard.
2. Noise.
The greatest component of the ambient noise level in this area is traffic
noise from the freeway. The dwellings will be constructed to achieve an interior
noise level of 45 dBA or lower. Exterior open space and recreation areas are gener-
ally screened by the berm along the eastern boundary and the building layout. The
project will increase the ambient noise level by about 1 dBA--an insignificant
amount.
City Planning Con)nission Page 3
Agenda Items for Meeting of August 13, 1980
3. Schools.
The project will result in an increase in school attendance in an area with
facilities which are currently operating in excess of capacity {senior high school
and elementary school). A1 though the number of students from this project is not
substantial, there are other large scale projects within these school districts.
The cumulative impact of these projects could result in a condition of overcrowding.
4. Traffic
The additional traffic generated by the project will result in a substantial
increase in traffic on the streets which provide access to the project and property
in the vicinity. This increase can be accomnodated by the existing circulation
system at an appropriate level of service. The present classification for the
system is service level "B", the increase in traffic generated by this project
will not be sufficient to change the service level to the next lower classification.
This traffic increase would result in a nominal increase in noise level,
greater inconvenience in gaining access to the streets and making turning movements,
and a proportional increase in safety hazards associated with the traffic increase.
This represents a modicum of reduction in the "quality of life."
August 4, 1980
TO: Members of the Planning Commission ,~?~,;
FROM: Stephen A, Taylor, Chalrman/Environmenta~"Control Commission
SUBJECT: Comments regarding EIR-80-2a Hilltop Courts
After reviewing the above noted EIR, the Commission finds that
the document has been prepared in accordance with the City of
Chula Vista Environmental Review Procedures and the State of
California guidelines and therefore, recommends that the Planning
Commission and City Council certify the EIR.
This recommendation is subject to input which may be received during
the public hearing process. Regarding the project itself the
following comments are offered:
1. Density
It is the opinion of the Environmental Control Commission that
the proposed density of 23 dwelling units per net acre is
incompatible with the adjoining single family development.
This finding is based on the fact that the "net acreage" includes
such features as, a major portion of the freeway acoustical berm
and the Telegraph Canyon Creek drainage facility along the
southern portion of the property. These considerations have
resulted in three story structures not only prevailing through-.
out the interior of the development but also in .several
instances along the Nacion frontage. The Commission has there-
fore concluded that development at the lower end of the range
of the densities established by the City Council would result
in a more appropriate development of this property.
2. Noise
Even considering the partial shielding of the site by the
earthen berm along the eastern property line, much of the site
will be exposed to an ambient noise level in access of 65dBA.
Therefore measures in excess of normal construction requirements
will be necessary to provide a livable interior environment (45dBA)
Additionally, with the three story construction there may be
additional freeway exposure which would require similar special
construction treatment.
3. Traffic
The project will result in a substantial increase in traffic,
however because the total volume will still be below a level
that will provide an adequate street and intersection level
of service, this impact cannot be classified as substantial
and adverse. There will however, be a degradation of the
"quality of life" for existing residents adjacent to and
utilizing this street system.
Conclusion
The Environmental Control Commission recommends to the Planning
Commission and City Council~that the EIR be certified and that an
alternative for development at the lower end of the 13-26 DU/Acre
range be granted.
SAT:av
COMMENTS APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL COMMISSION
AT THE SPECIAL BUSINESS MEETING HELD AUGUST 4, 1980, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE, TO-WIT:
AYES: Commissioners Taylor, Iversen, Hodson, Donovan, Macevicz,
Hernandez and Goodrich.
Noes: None.
Abstain: None.
Absent: None.
ATTEST:
~ ~.n ~1 ago~ ~,~ Secr~ary
~- Cit'y Boards and-Commissions
August 4, 1980
"J" ST.
J ) ! r., HALECREST
illl
ILLAN
EAST
£11~- ~O-2A""~' '"' '"
· '" I..OCATOR'
I FIG 2
City Planning Commiss,~n Page 4
Agenda Items for Meeting of August 13, 1980
3. PUBLIC HEARING: Request to extend hours of operation of 7-Eleven market
at 1655 A Brandjavine to 24 hours per da~ - Southland Corp.
A. BACKGROUND
The applicant, Southland Corporation, is seeking permission to allow their
7-Eleven store located at 1655 A Brandywine Avenue to remain open 24 hours a day.
The property is zoned P-C, however, it is subject to the regulations of the C-N
zone which limits the hours of operation of a business from 7:00 a.m. to ll:O0 p.m.
B. RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a motion approving the request for the 7-Eleven store located at 1655 A
Brandywine Avenue to remain open 24 hours a day provided no significant opposition
is expressed by the residents of the neighborhood.
C. DISCUSSION
1. Existing site characteristics.
The 7-Eleven store is located within a partially developed 1.66 acre neighbor-
hood commercial center at the southeast corner of Brandywine Avenue and Sequoia
Street. At present the market is the only tenant occupying the recently constructed
building. The adjoining land uses are: north - single family dwellings; south -
vacant; east - tennis courts; and west - condominiums. A city park is located at
the northwest corner of the intersection.
2. Other facilities.
Over a period of time the Planning Commission has approved the extension of
hours of operation for various businesses in several other C-N zones. The only
businesses now operating 24 hours a day within the C-N zones are four other 7-Eleven
stores. One additional 7-Eleven store located at 1421 Hilltop was authorized to
remain open until 12:00 midnight; however, that store has since been closed. Other
types of markets and restaurants within the C-N zoned areas of the city have typically
had extension of hours to midnight or 2:00 a.m. on specific days of the week.
3. Study.
A study was conducted by the Planning Department a few years ago regarding the
usesin the C-N zone which were granted extension of hours. The study, which was
accepted by the City Council, concluded that there was no correlation between the
extended hours and the number of disturbances at these facilities and the expanded
hours did offer a service and convenience to the residents of the neighborhood.
D. ANALYSIS
The 7-Eleven operation in this center is separated well from the adjoining
residential uses. Therefore the extended hours of operation would appear to have
a minimal impact on the nearby residential developments. However, since the purpose
of any neighborhood business is to provide convenient shopping for residents in the
area, it is appropriate that their wishes be given considerable weight since no real
land use planning issues are involved. The applicant has submitted a petition
containing the signatures of approximately 135 residents in support of the extension
in the hours of operation. Three homeowners associations, representing approximately
600 homes in this area have been notified and likely will respond~ Unless consider-
able opposition is expressed at the meeting, the request should be approved.
£ L£M£NTARY
~CHO01-
A T T,4 CHED
VAC
VAC
I
PARKING
71111[-1
~ StOREs
. VAC
City Planning Commission Page 5
Agenda Items for Meeting of August 13, 1980
4. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional use permit PCC-80-21 - Request for expansion of
existing mini-shop at 196 Broadwa~ - Atlantic Richfield Co.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Atlantic Richfield Company is requesting permission to be allowed to
conduct the sale of gasoline in conjunction with a proposed retail market at
196 Broadway in the C-T zone. The site is presently operating as a service station
and has permission to operate a mini-shop in connection therewith.
2. The proposed project does not constitute a substantial change of land use
and is therefore not subject to environmental review under CEQA regulations.
B. RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a motion to deny the request.
C. DISCUSSION
1. Existing site characteristics.
The subject property is a 0.42 acre parcel (125' x 156') located at the
northwest corner of Broadway and "~'Street. The site is presently developed with
a service station which offers full service to motorists (auto repair, full and
self service gasoline) including a mini-shop offering snacks, cigarettes and soft
drinks which was approved by the Planning Commission in 1978. In addition, the
City Council approved an appeal in 1979 allowing a limited sales area for beer
and wine. The 1500 sq. ft. building is located in the approximate center of the
lot with covered pump islands on the east and south sides of the building.
2. Proposed development.
The applicant intends to discontinue the auto repair service and convert the
entire structure into a retail market. In addition the self serve pumps adjacent
to Broadway will be removed. The southerly driveway on Broadway is to be closed
and six parking spaces provided along the Broadway street frontage in the vicinity
of the closed driveway. A handicap space is to be provided at the north side of
the building (see plot plan).
3. Similar request.
The proposed conversion will result in the market becoming the principal use
of the property, thereby requiring that a conditional use permit be obtained for
the sale of gasoline in conjunction therewith. This is very similar to the
situation which occurred at Broadway and "L" Street when the existing service
station was removed and replaced with a retail store and market which requested
permission to sell gasoline. The only difference between the two situations is
that in this case the existing building is to be converted into a market. The
proposal at Broadway and "L" Street was filed without action, however, the Planning
Department had recommended denial due to potential traffic conflicts between the
various land uses and possible congestion in the circulation layout.
City Planning Commission Page 6
Agenda Items for Meeting of August 13, 1980
4. The staff has the same concerns regarding this request which are
compounded because the applicant is attempting to use the site as is, with minor
site adjustments. This station has a record of high volume gasoline sales. The
elimination of one pump island will likely increase the gas sales activity on the
remaining "E" Street pumps. The resulting stacking of cars waiting for pumps to
clear would render the proposed parking spaces almost useless since the required
back-up area encroaches into that stacking area. Since "E" Street carries 2½ times
the traffic volume of "L" Street, the Broadway and "E" intersection is more con~
gested than Broadway and "L" Street.
5. The circulation system required for gasoline stations is not easily
adaptable to standard retail store operations because of increased curb openings,
stacking requirements and parking habits. The uses can coexist only if independent
circulation systems are employed. It would be necessary to completely redevelop
this site to accomplish both adequate parking and circulation for a retail store
and gasoline sales. The lack of an acceptable site plan leaves the staff no
choice but to recommend denial of the request.
6. Denial of the request allows the applicant to either: a) use the site
for a retail market; or, b) continue the present operation with no change. The
denial does not constitute a revocation of the previously approved conditional
use permit.
D. FINDINGS
1. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary or desir-
able to provide a serpice or facility which will contribute to the general well
being of the neighborhood or the community.
The design of the facility presents traffic conflicts which prohibit this
operation from contributing to the general welfare of the neighborhood.
2. That such use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case,
be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity.
The conflict in traffic movement between cars entering and exiting the site
provides unsafe and conflicting traffic patterns which would likely create
congestion in the intersection. Such a condition would be detrimental to
safety of persons in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use will co~ply with the regulations and condition~
specified in the code for such use.
The proposed site plan does not comply with city regulations on parking and
circulation for safety.
4. That the granting of this conditional use will not adversely affect the
general plan of the city or the'adopted plan of any governmental agency.
The granting of this request does not affect the General Plan.
~ LOCATOR
PROd: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD Co. PCC-80-21
~~ l ffXHIBIT A
~C¢-~0-~./
City Planning Commission Page 7
Agenda Items for Meeting of August 13, 1980
5, PUBLIC HEARING: Tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 80-24,
Bri~htwoo~ Village, construction of new 9 unit condominium
at 163 Brlghtwood
A. BACKGROUND
1. The applicant is seeking approval of a tentative subdivision map known
as Brightwood Village, Chula Vista Tract 80-24, for the purpose of developing a
9 unit townhouse condominium project on a 0.35 acre parcel located at 163-165
Brightwood Avenue in the R-3 zone.
2. An Initial Study, IS-80-41, of possible adverse environmental impacts
of the project was conducted by the Environmental Review Committee on January 28,
1980. The Committee concluded that there would be no significant environmental
effects and recommended adoption of the conditioned Negative Declaration.
B. RECO~4ENDATION
1. Adopt the conditioned Negative Declaration on IS-80-41 and find that
this project will have no significant environmental impact.
2. Based on the findings contained in Section D of this report, adopt a
motion recommending that the City Council approve the tentative subdivision map
for Brightwood Village, Chula Vista Tract 80-24, subject to the following condi-
tions:
a. The applicant shall remove and replace the curb and gutter along the
project's frontage on Brightwood Avenue as necessary to correct the
drainage problem. A construction permit shall be obtained for said
improvements prior to the approval of the final map.
b. A soils report shall be prepared and all recommendations are to be
incorporated into the project.
c. The conditions of approval set forth by the Design Review Committee
shall be met.
C. DISCUSSION
1. Adjacent zoning and land use:
North R-3 Apartments and duplex
South R-3 Single family dwelling
East R-1 Single family dwelling (Fern Street)
West R-3 Condominiums
2. Existing site characteristics.
The subject property is a level 15,395 sq. ft. lot with 85 feet of frontage
along the east side of Brightwood Avenue, 84 feet south of Flower Street, with
a lot depth of 171 feet. The site is presently developed with a single family
dwelling and duplex which are scheduled for removal to make room for the proposed
development. There are two large trees located within the front setback (one will
be removed) and a hedge along the northerly property line.
City planning Co, mis Jn Page 8
Agenda Items for Meeting of August 13, 1980
3. Proposed development.
a. The developer proposes to construct a 9 unit two story townhouse
condominium project consisting of all two bedroom units (994 sq. ft. each).
The units will be housed in two structures on the north and south sides of the
property separated by a center driveway. Each unit will have a one car garage
and there will be 7 open parking spaces for a total of 16 onsite spaces.
b. Each unit will have a 42 sq. ft. balcony and a 156 sq. ft. (6' x 26')
or 171 sq. ft. (6' x 28.5') patio for a total of 198 to 213 sq. ft. of private
open space per unit.
c. The proposed storage will be divided into three locations. There
will be 45 cu. ft. in the garage, 144 cu. ft. on the balcony and 36 cu. ft.
under the interior stairs. The total storage is 225 cu. ft. per unit, or 25
cu. ft. over the ordinance requirement. Section 19.56.020 of the code states
that the required storage may not be divided into more than two spaces; however,
Section 19.56.070 allows departure from this requirement if good cause can be
shown. In this instance all of the storage is provided adjacent to or within the
unit, thereby making the storage much more secure and available to the residents.
d. On February 21, 1980 the Design Review Committee conditionally approved
the proposed project of contemporary design consisting of a stucco exterior,
shake shingle roof and wood trim and doors.
D. FINDINGS
Pursuant to Sections 66473.5 and 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
tentative subdivision map for Brightwood Village, Chula Vista Tract 80-24, is
recommended for approval based on the following findings:
1. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the
proposed development conforms to all standards established by the City for
such project.
2. The design of the subdivision will not affect the existing improvements:
streets, sewer, etc., which have been designed to avoid any serious health
problems.
3. Approval of the project will not adversely affect the public service needs
of residents of the city or available fiscal and environmental resources.
4. The subdivision is consistent with the General Plan Elements as follows:
a. The construction of condominiums within the R-3 zone in an area which
is essentially improved does not affect the following elements of the
General Plan: Lane Use, Circulation, Seismic Safety, Safety, Noise,
Scenic Highways, Bicycle Routes, Public Buildings, Conservation, Parks
and Recreation and Open Space.
b. 'Housing Element - The construction of condominium units will provide
additional housing for the residents of the community.
CONDITIONED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT TITLE: Wilson g Brennan Condominiums
Project Location: 163-165 Brightwood
Project Proponent: Dave Wilson
373 E St. Chula Vista 92010
CASE NO. IS-80-41 DATE: January 28, 1980
A. Project Settin~
The project site involves approximately 15,400 sq. ft. of property
located at 163-165 Brightwood Ave. The site is currently developed
with one single family dwelling and one duplex. Adjacent uses
consist of multiple family units to the north and east and a single
family dwelling to the south. Brightwood Ave. and umutiple family
units are located to the west.
B. Project Description
The applicant proposes to remove the existing units on the site in
order to construct ten new two bedroom condominium units contained
in four two story structures. In addition, parking will be provided
in garages at the first floor level along with open parking at the
rear of the site. Appropriate landscaping will also be provided.
C. Compatibility with zoning and plans
The proposed project will result in a net density of 28.3 units per
acre which is consistent with the current R-3 zoning and high density
residential land use designation of the General Plan.
D. Identification of environmental impacts
1. Soils
The City Engineering Dept. has indicated that expansive soils
are present in the project area, therefore, to assure stable
construction, a soils report shall be required with all
recommendations incorporated into the project.
2. Schools
The local elementary school (Feaster Elementary) is currently
operating over capacity. Additional units will further burden
these facilities. To assure that adequate educational
facilities are available to new students resulting from this
project, written assurance from the appropmiate school
district should be obtained.
E. Mitigation necessary to avoid significant effect
1. A soils report shall be prepared and all recommendations
are to be incorporated into the project.
2. Written assurance of adequate educational facilities from
the appropriate school district will be required.
F. Findings of Insignificant impact
1. The site is void of any significant natural or man made
resources. Expansive soils may be present, however, proposed
mitigation will ensure stable construction.
2. The residential proposal is consistent with the General
Plan and associated elements and is not anticipated to achieve
short term to the disadvantage of long term environmental
goals.
3. No impacts are anticipated to occur which could interact
to create a substantial cumulative effect on the environment.
4. The project will result in limited additional vehicle
traffic and no significant increase in related emissions or
noise will occur.
G. Consultation
1. Individuals and Organizations
Cit~ of Chula Vista D. J. Peterson - Director of Planning
Bill Ullrich - Assoc. Eng.
Ted Monsell Fire Marshal
Gene Grady - Director of Bldg. & Hsg.
Roger Gregg - Agency for owner
2. Documents
IS-79-37 Lea Manor
The Initial Study Application and evaluation forms documenting the
findings of no significant impact are on file and available for public
review at the Chula Vista Planning Dept., 276 4th Ave., Chula Vista, CA.
ENVIR~L REVIEW COORDINATOR
EN 3 (rev. 5/77)
/ sT. L .... J I c~.~.~^.
I/I I I I I .11 [___:_:-_-J~[---~,
/llllllll /"
ill I ~1 I I
[ "o"
/ FLOWER , Sr
I ', I ~ ~ I I ~ I wc ~ ~ ~
I;'~ ~' ~ ~---J~
I I I ' I
I I I t · / ~ --~
.... ,
I I I I I ---- PARKING
I'I , , ,_ 1 ~-c., ~,
I I I ~ F-= -1 s~.oo~
~I I I h-'q~l I ~ ]- i
I I I/ti I ~ , I
~ ROd:. BRIG~OoD VILLAGE
~/~
BRIGHTWOOD AVE
City Planning Commiss,on Page 9
Agenda Items for Meeting of August 13, 1980
6. PUBLIC HEARING: Tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 80-25,
Castle Park Townhomes, conversion of 39 units to condominiums
at 1436 Hilltop Drive
A. BACKGROUND
1. The applicant is requesting approval of a tentative subdivision map known
as Castle Park Townhomes, Chula Vista Tract 80-25, for the purpose of converting
an existing 39 apartment complex into a one lot condominium. The project is located
on a 2.26 acre parcel at 1436 Hilltop Drive in the R-3-G-D zone.
2. The project is exempt from environmental review as a class l(k) exemption.
B. RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings contained in Section "E" of this report, adopt a motion
recommending that the City Council approve the tentative subdivision map for Castle
Park Townhomes, Chula Vista Tract 80-25, subject to the following conditions:
1. The developer shall grant a 7.5 foot easement to the City for street tree
planting and maintenance along Tobias Drive prior to approval of the final
map.
2. The developer shall grant a 7 foot easement to the City for street tree
planting and maintenance along Hilltop Drive prior to approval of the final
map.
3. The developer shall construct wheelchair ramps as shown on the tentative
map prior to approval of the final map. A construction permit shall be
obtained for said improvement work.
4. Prior to approval of the final map, the developer shall reconstruct or
alter the curb outlet on Tobias Drive to prevent water from standing in
said outlet. A construction permit must be obtained for this work.
5. The developer shall obtain the necessary permits to do the work required
for approval, including conditions specified by the Design Review Committee,
within 120 days after the approval of the final map. Such work shall
proceed in an expeditious manner and shall be complete 90 days from the
issuance of the permits. No units shall be occupied until final inspec-
tions have been made and all work required by this approval is complete.
6. The developer shall construct 15 additional carports adjacent to and
similar in design to the existing carports.
C. DISCUSSION
1. Adjacent zoning and land use:
North R-3-G-D Apartments
South R-2-T Single family attached dwellings
East R-1 & C-N High School and commercial
West R-2-T Single family attached dwellings
City Planni. n9 Commis n Page l0
Agenda Items for Meeting of August 13, 1980
2. Existing site characteristics.
The subject property is a level, through lot lying between Hilltop Drive
and Tobias Drive opposite East Rienstra Street, with 165 feet of frontage on both
streets and a depth of 596 feet. The site is presently developed with a 39 unit
two story contemporary apartment complex, constructed in 1972, which consists of
l0 residential structures, a single story laundry/recreation building, swimming
pool and carports. There are 23 two bedroom units, 15 three bedroom and one
four bedroom plus den. The large unit has been illegally converted into two
units but will be reconverted back into one unit. There are a total of 76 parking
spaces provided onsite, of which 24 are carports and l0 compact spaces. The parking
meets the requirements of the code.
3. Storage.
Two bedroom units are required to have 200 cu. ft. of storage, three bedroom
units require 250 cu. ft. and units with four or more bedrooms must have 300 cu.ft.
The two bedroom units are to be provided with 177 cu. ft. located under the stairs
leading to the second floor and a linen closet containing 80 cu. ft. on the second
floor will be used for storage, for a total of 257 cu. ft. The three bedroom units
will have 100 cu. ft. in the patio area, 177 cu. ft. under the stairs and 80 cu. ft.
on the second floor, for a total of 357 cu. ft. The four bedroom unit will have
a total of 257 cu. ft. located under the two stairways and 120 cu. ft. in the patio
for a total of 377 cu. ft.
4. Private open space.
Each unit has private open space areas which meet or exceed the code require-
ments. The two bedroom units have a patio containing 80 sq. ft., the three bedroom
units a 155 sq. ft. patio, and the four bedroom unit will have two patio areas
totalling 235 sq. ft.
5. Design Review Committee.
The proposed project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on July 17,
1980. The item was continued in order that the applicant address certain issues
regarding the enhancement of the entry ways as well as provide relief to certain
stucco wall areas. At this time the matter has not been resolved, but it is
anticipated that the project will be approved prior to City Council approval.
D. ANALYSIS
1. The proposed project meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the code
regarding storage, parking and open space. It is anticipated that the Design Review
Committee will approve the project subject to specific conditions regarding land-
scaping and/or architectural modifications. The illegally converted unit will be
converted back into a four bedroom plus den unit. For these reasons it is recom-
mended that the project be approved.
City Planning Commis n Page ll
Agenda Items for Meeting of August 13, 1980
2. The Planning Commission has recently recommended denial of a similar
project on the finding that the conversion was not consistent with the General
Plan because it reduced the number of apartment units in the city. That project,
plus a request for a three month moratorium on conversions, will be considered
by the City Council on August 12, 1980, the day before the Commission is to
consider this item. A verbal report will be made at the Commission meeting
concerning the Council's action.
3. The project has 24 existing carports; staff is recommending the addition
of 15 additional carports to provide one carport for each unit. Although covered
parking is not specifically required in the R-3 zone, the additional carports would
provide a mere reasonable and logical number for the planned condominium sales
program.
E. FINDINGS
Pursuant to Sections 66473.5 and 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
tentative subdivision map for Castle Park To~nhomes, Chula Vista Tract 80-25,
is recommended for approval based on the following findings:
1. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the pro-
posed development conforms to all standards established by the City for
such project.
2. The design of the subdivision will not affect the existing improvements:
streets, sewer, etc., which have been designed to avoid any serious health
problems.
3. Approval of the project will not adversely affect the public service needs
of residents of the city or available fiscal and environmental resources.
4. The subdivision is consistent with the General Plan Elements as follows:
a. The conversion of apartment units into a condominium does not affect
the following elements of the General Plan: Land Use, Circulation,
Seismic Safety, Safety, Noise, Scenic Highways, Bicycle Routes, Public
Buildings, Conservation, Parks and Recreation, and Open Space.
b. Housing Element - While the conversion of apartment units into condo-
miniums will reduce the inventory of rental housing, it will also
permit an expanded choice of housing ownership by providing attached
housing below prices established for new construction.
PARK
I
-'J MF,)\ ....__
! _ ,HIGH
SCHOOL
MFD
E RIENSTRA
PERMIT TO CONVERT 40 APARTMI~IT
ATE: Aug I:~, 1980 ) 1~'~6UNITS HILLTopTO CONDOMINIUMSDR
Z
TOBIAS -