Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/1980/09/10 AGENDA City Planning Commission Chula Vista, California Wednesday, September 10, 1980 - 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - SILENT PRAYER APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Meeting of August 27, 1980 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 1. PUBLIC HEARING: a. Specific Plan for area added to South College Sectional Planning Area b. Revision to Chula Vista Tract 80-20, Charter Point, adding 1.5 acres 2. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional use permit PCC-81-3, request to locate psychiatric hospital at 730 Dora Lane - Vista Hill Hospital 3. PUBLIC HEARING (cont.): Conditional use permit PCC-80-21, request for expansion of existing mini-shop at 196 Broadway - Atlantic Richfield Company 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of revocation of conditional use permit C-67-22 for operation of car wash facility at 215 Woodlawn, - Dennis Gray, operator ORAL COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR'S REPORT COMMISSION COMMENTS To: City Plann,,,g Commission From: D.J. Peterson, Director of Planning Subject: Staff report on agenda items for Planning Commission Meeting of September 10, 1980 1. PUBLIC HEARING: a. Specific Plan for area added to South College Sectional Plannin~ Area b. Revision to Chula Vista Tract 80-20, Charter Point, addle9 1.5 acres A. BACKGROUND 1. On May 20, 1980 the City Council approved the tentative subdivision map for Charter Point, Chula Vista Tract 80-20, and the Sectional Planning Area plan for the easterly 41 acres of the South College area of the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan, located at the northwest quadrant of Otay Lakes Road and Telegraph Canyon Road in the P-C zone. The proposed development consists of 260 condominium units on postage stamp lots. 2. At the time of review, it was discussed that 1.5 acres of available surplus college property located at the southeast corner of the Southwestern Community College may be acquired by the developer and incorporated into the project. The property has since been acquired by the developer who is now requesting approval of a revision to the tentative map and Sectional Planning Area plan to include the 1.5 acres in the proposed development. On August 12, 1980 the property was rezoned from R-1 to P-C in anticipation of the revision and to make the zoning of the properties consistent. 3. On August 7, 1980 the Environmental Review Committee found that the proposed revision to the Charter Point subdivision and South College Sectional Planning Area plan would not have a significant effect on the environment and recommended that the Environmental Impact Report, EIR-80-4, be recertified. B. RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt a motion recertifying EIR-80-4.and adopting Candidate CEQA findings in accordance with Resolution EIR-80-4-A. 2. Adopt a motion recommending that the City Council: a. Approve a revision to the South College Sectional Planning Area plan, as approved by Planning Commission Resolution PCM-80-17 and City Council Resolution No. 10094, to include the additional 1.5 acre site. b. Approve the revised tentative map for Charter Point, Chula Vista Tract 80-20, increasing the subdivision from 260 units to 276 units, based on the findings and subject to the conditions set forth in Resolution PCS-80-20, with the following modifications: 1) Resolution PCS-80-20 shall be modified in the paragraph "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED" to read: "The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the revised tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 80-20, Charter Point, subject to the condition that the applicant enters into an agreement to provide 3% of his units (6 units) for rent at rates affordable by families earning no more than the median income in San Diego County as defined by City Planning Commission Page 2 Agenda Items for Meeting of September 10, 1980 the federal government ($17,700 per year at this time). In lieu of the provision of such housing on site, the applicant may make a payment equivalent to 3% of the market value of the project, such payment to be deposited into a fund designated for the purpose of providing low and moderate income housing. Alternatively, such housing may be provided in another location approved by the City Council. Such recommendation for approval is made subject to the following conditions:" (1 through 32) 2) Condition #22 shall be revised to read: "The develope~shall enter into a separate agreement with the City of Chula Vista stipulating that they or their successors in interest shall be required to participate in a reimbursement or other district for the construction of Telegraph Canyon Road prior to the approval of the final map." 3) Two conditions shall be added: "31. Two fire hydrants shall be provided within the 1.5 acre area. Fire flow requirements to be the same as for the other hydrants." "32. The developer shall grant a 10-foot sewer easement parallel to the proposed public sewer serving Lots ~7-70." 4) The map shall be revised as follows: a) Show proposed sewer serving Lots 67-70. b) Indicate proposed 10-foot wide sewer easement paralleling sewer serving Lots 67-70. c) Update parking space tabulation to include additional spaces. 5) Modifications to the language pertaining to conformance with the Housing Element of the General Plan based upon the provision of 3% of the units at rates affordable by low or moderate income families. C. DISCUSSION 1. Property acquisition. As indicated earlier, the subject property (1.5 acres) was recently acquired by the developer and has been incorporated into his ownership through the adjust- ment plan procedure. It is, therefore, appropriate for the property to be incor- porated into the original plan of development. City Planning Commission Page 3 Agenda Items for Meeting of September 10, 1980 2. Proposed development. The applicant proposes to construct an additional 14 units on the property, bringing the total number to 274 units. The units, which are identical in architecture and design as originally proposed, will be contained in four struc- tures as follows: 2 uphill fourplexes, 1 downhill fourplex and 1 downhill duplex. (The buildings are front to back split level structures). Each unit will have a two car garage and 16 open guest parking spaces will be provided. Access is provided by a 26 foot wide private road extending from the public street (Apache Drive) serving the Charter Point development. The proposed revision was anticipated in the original design of the subdivision and therefore does not alter that design except for the actual encroachment of the access road serving the additional 14 units. Therefore, the revision represents a logical extension of the original map, together with the findings and conditions of approval. 3. The Planning Commission's original resolution approving this tract carried with it the condition requiring the applicant to devote 10% of his units to low or moderate income units. Since the time of that approval, the staff has formulated a revised "inclusionary zoning" policy which, if adopted, would reduce the developer's obligation from 10% to 3%. Some of the changes to the resolution are being recom- mended to reflect this more recent thinking. (The Commission was exposed to this matter at the August 20, 1980 study session durin~ the discussion of my memo to the City Manager dated July 28, 1980 on this subject.) RESOLUTION EIR-80-4-A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING CO,Vi~iISSION ADOPTING CANDIDATE ~INDINGS OF FACT RELA?ING TO DEVELOPMENT OF SOUTH COLLIGE SECIIONAL PLANNING AREA (CHARTER POINT) WDEREAS, an environmental impact report, EIR-78-2 for the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan was certified by the Planning Commission on February 22, 1978 and EIR-80-4 for the South College Sectional Planning Area (Charter Point) was certified by the Planning Commission on ~mrch 19, 1980, and WHEREAS, it is the policy of the State of California that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been prepared which identifies impacts which are significant unless it is infeasible to avoid those impacts, and W)tEREAS, Multi Systems, Inc. has prepared Candidate Findings of Fact in accordance with the California Public Resources Code, and WHEREAS, those findings have been reviewed by the Environmental Review Section of the Planning Department and recommended for adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, [~E IT RESOLVED that in accordance with the attached Candidate Findings of Fact: 1. The Planning Commission having reviewed and considered the information in EIR-80-4 finds th,it changes or alterations have been required in, or incorpor- ated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects identified ir~ the final Environmental Impact Report in the following a. Land form b. Biology c. Transportation/access 2. The Planning Commission, having reviewed and considered the information in EIR-80-4, finds that the provision of educational services is the responsibility of the appropriate sc]hool districts with State funding sources. The City of Chula Vista will continue to provide a mechanism for cooperation between the developer and the school districts in providing adequate educational services. If the school districts provide evidence of overcrowding, further actions may be necessary· PASSED AI4D APPROVED By THE CITY PLANNING COM)qISSION OF CNULA VISTA, C. ALIFORNIA this 23rd day of April, 1980, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Commissioners Stevenson, R. Johnson, Williams, Smith, G. Johnson and NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Pressutti /~ ENVIt (MENTAL CONSULTAXTS _ ' ~t[~'~'~, [N(~o ?343RonsonR:~a~.~5ui,eH.SanDi~go. CA~2111 · 1714) 292-5014 CANDIDATE FINDINGS OF FACT SOUTH COLLEGE SPA (CHARTER POINT) EIR #80-4 CITY OF CHULA VISTA Prepared by James B. Hare February 28, 1980 I. INTRODUCTION The fol]owin(l findings have been prepared in accordance with Section 15088 of Title 14 of the California Administrative Code, and Section 5.7 of the Environmental Review Policy of the City of Chula Vista. These two directives both state that, in order to approve a proj(,ct which has one or more significant environ- mental affects, a finding within at least one of the following categories must bc~ made: Category 1. Chan,=es o~- alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects thereof as identified in the final EIR. Category 2. Such chanqes or alterations are within the ~esponsibili~y and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the body makinq the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other aqency. Category 3. Specific oconomic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. For the Char~er ~>int ~roject, a summary of impacts and findings has been prepared which, if adopted, indicate that response to all significant impac* s can be Dlaced into these categories. II. FINDINGS The South College SPA project represents a subsequent development proposal within the context of the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan. The project will construct 260 residential dwelling units iJ multi-unit "townhouse" clusters. The number and type of units proposed has been found to be consistent with the Specific Plan. Within this background, the following factor-specific findings are proposed. A. Landform (EIR Section 3.2) The project will, by virtue of the volume of grading proposed in the Tentative Map dated September 21, 1979, have a significant aesthetic impact. These impacts would take place in an area designated for "natural open space" in the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan. Further, the slopes facing Telegraph Canyon Road are included in the City's General Plan Scenic Hi¢~hways Element. Findinq (Cateqory 1). Changes in the project, incorp- orated in the map dated February 5, 1980,~uce the impacts of the project on the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan Open Space to a level of insignificance by increasing the natural slope area.and reducing impacts on botanical resources. Landscaping treatments for manufactured slopes further mitigate aesthetic impacts on Teleqraph Canyon Road, thereby reducing to a level of insiqn~ficance impacts on the scenic highway. B. Biology (EIR ~ction 3.6) Significant i~i~act~ to the on-site Cleveland Sage community will renault from grading and filling activities on slope areas facing Telegraph Canyon Road. These activities will also endanger the Burrowing Owls which nest on the project site. Findin~ (Cate~or? l). Changes in the Tentative Map, as dated Febr~ary 5, 1980, has reduced grading activities on slopes facing Telegraph Canyon Road. Adherence to the map will Yeduce impacts on the on-site Cleveland Sage community to a level of insignificance. Further, the project applicant will initiate a zoologist-directed program to remove ~%urrowing Owls from the project site during gradin~l activities. Implementation of this program will ~>duc~ impacts on this faunal species to a level of in~3ignif~cance. C. Schools (EIR Section 3.7) Costs of the construction of new school facilities have been found to be higher than developer fees or the current level of property taxes can accommodate. Thus, the fiscal impact of project-generated student populations is significant. Finding (Category 2). Changes or alterations in the developer fees payment schedules so that such fees would cover the costs of new facilities is the responsibility of the school districts involved. Such changes can and should be adopted by the school districts. D. Transportation/Access (EIR Section 3.10) Vehicle trips generated by the project will use Telegraph Canyon Road and the Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay Lakes Road intersection. Both of these road system components are currently carrying high traffic volumes and the presence of additional project-generated traffic will constitute a significant impact. Finding (Category 1). Offsite improvements, contributions to which have been incorporated in the project plans, will mitigate to a level of insignificance the street capacity impacts of the project. These improvements will consist of the widening of Telegraph Canyon Road to four lanes eastward from the end of the existing four lane configuration to a point east of the project site. RESOLUTION NO. PCM-80-17 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLAHNING COI'~iISSIOH RECO~iENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE SOUTH COLLEGE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA OF EL RANCHO DEL REY SPECIFIC PLAN I~HEREAS, Ordinance No. 1824, adopted by the City Council on August 15, 1978, adopted a new Sp(~cific Plan/General Development Plan for the P-C zone of E1 Rancho del Rey, and WHEREAS, a development plan for the easterly 41 acres of the South College Sectional Planning Area of the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan was filed with the Planning Department by Pacific Scene, Inc., and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission set the time and place for a public hearing to consider said development plan and notice of said hearing, with its purpose, was given by the publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least ten days prior to the date of said hearing, and WHEREAS, a hearing was held at said time and place, namely 7:DO p.m., April 23, 1980, in the Council Chambers, Public Service Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed, and WHEREAS, on March 6, 1980 the Planning Commission certified the environmental impact report, EIR-80-4 for the project, and on April 23, 1980 the Planning Commission adopted Candidate CEQA findings relating to environmental impacts of the project as contained in EIR-80-4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. From facts presented to the Planning Commission, the Commission finds: a. The proposed sectional planning area plan is in conformity with the general plan of the P-C zone, any adopted specific plans, and the Chul,~ Vista general plan and its several elements: The 260 units proposed on the site is the maximum number of allowable units on the eastern portion of the South College Sectional Planning Area {10 units per acre). The proposed development is in keeping with the goals and objectives of the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan. The units have been designed to fit the site {split level units) and the majority of the open space has been left in a natural state. The proposed circulation system has provided access to the western portion of the Sectional Planning Area and serves the proposed development. b. The proposed sectional planning area plan Would promote the orderly, sequentialized development of the involved sectional planning area: lhe proposed project has been exempted from west to east develop- me~ jltcy on the condition that Telegraph Ca~ Road is widened to four lanes between Casa del Rey and Otay Lakes Road as part of the subject development. The plan does provide access to other areas subject to development and is located in the vicinity of an area already developed. c. The proposed sectional planning area plan would not adversely affect adjacent land use, residential enjoyment, circulation or environ- mental quality: lhe proposed project will be required to widen both major roads adjacent to the subject property, thereby increasing the traffic capabilities of the roads and therefore, since the development is in general conformance with the adopted E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan, it should not adveKsely affect the adjacent land uses. 2. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that the develop- ment plan for the easterly 41 acres of the South College Sectional Planning Area of E1 Rancho del Rey be approved, subject to the following conditions: a. The developer shall work with the Planning staff in revising the development standards to correspond with the proposed development. Said revision shall be completed prior to consideration of the final map. b. The recreation building shall be architecturally consistent with the residential structures and shall be subject to the approval of the Zoning Ad~ninistrator. c. All retaining walls shall have a minimum setback of 5 feet from the inside edge of the sidewalk. d. The landscaping plan for the project shall take into consideration the stand of Cleveland Sage. e. All residential structures shall be constructed to achieve a 45 dBA interior noise level in accordance with Title 25 of the California Administrative Code. Additionally, the patios along Otay Lakes Road shall be shielded from traffic noise. f. This approval is contingent upon the City Council's approval of a plan by the applicant to make available 26 of the units to low and moderate income families either on the project or on another site acceptable to City Council. 3. That this resolution be transmitted, along with the proposed development plan to the City Council, and a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant. PASSED AND APPROV~ . THE CITY PLANNING CO/q~ISSION OF CHULA ~ , CALIFORNIA, this 23rd day of April, 1980 by the following vote, to-wits AYES: Co~issioners R. Johnson, G. Johnson, Stevenson, O'Neill, Smith and Williams ~0£S: None ABSE~I: Com~ni ss loner Pressutti ATTEST: J ~ Sec-retary RESOLUTION NO. PCS-80-20 (REVISED) RESOLUTION OF FHE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECO~ENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE APPROVAL OF THE REVISED TENTATIVE SUB- DIVISION MAP F~)R CHULA VISTA TRACT 80-20, CHARTER POINT WHEREAS, a revised tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 80-20, Charter Point, was filed by Pacific Scene, Inc., to subdivide approximately 42)s acres located in the South College Sectional Planning Area into 274 residen- tial lots and 9 common area lots, and WHEREAS, Section 66473.5 of the State Map Act provides that approval of a subdivision map shall be based upon findings of consistency between the subdivision map and the adopted general or specific plan for the area, and WHEREAS, the Planning Cor~nission set the time and place for a public hearing to consider said revised tentative map, and notice of said hearing, with its purpose, was given by the publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least l0 days prior to the date of said hearing, and WHEREAS, a hearing was held at said time and place, namely 7;00 p.m., September lO, 1980, in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed, and WHEREAS, on September 10, lgSO the Planning Comnission adopted the Candidate CEQA findings relating to environmental impacts of the project as contained in environmental impact report EIR-80-4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: From facts presented to the Planning Commission, the Commission finds that the tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 80-20, Charter Point, is in conformance with the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan adopted by the City Council on August 15, 1978 and the amended Sectional Planning Area plan and the various elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following: 1. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposal contorms to all standards established by the City for such projects. 2. The design of the subdivision will not affect the existing inl)rovements, streets, sewer, etc., which have been designed to avoid any serious problems. 3. The project is in substantial conformance with the Chula Vista General Plan Elements as follows: a. Land Use Element - The E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan designates the area for medium density residential, a range of 6-10 dwelling units per acre, which would permit a maximum density of 277 units on the subject property. The developer proposes to construct 274 units on the site. b. Circulalion Element - The development will be served by a combin- ation o( public and private streets and a stub street has been provided to serve adjacent properties to the west. In addition, the adj(>ining streets will be widened and improved to city stand- ards for major roads. c. Housing Element - The applicant is required to make 3%, or 6 units, available to families of median income. d. Conservation Element - Approximately 13 acres of open space on the subject property is designated on the £1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan; the developer proposes to provide 10+ acres of open space, 7+ acres of which will be left natural. e. Parks and Recreation, and Open Space Elements - The proposed develop- ment will be required to pay fees in lieu of the dedication and improvement of park lands. The map conforms to the Open Space Element. f. Seismic Safety and Safety Elements - NO known faults exist within close proximity to the subject property. The proposed circulation system will facilitate the movement of emergency vehicles. g. Noise Element - All dwellings are to be designed so as not to exceed a maximum interior noise level of 45 dBA. h. Scenic }lighway Element - The majority of the slopes adjacent to Otay Lakes Road will be left natural. Manmade cut or fill slopes will be enhanced by the planting of trees. i. Bicycle Routes Element - Otay Lakes Road and Telegraph Canyon Road have been designed to accommodate bicycle lanes as identified on the Bicycle Element. j. Public I~uildings Element - No public buildings have been designated on the subject property. 4. Pursuant t(~ Section 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Commission certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources. -2- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Planninq Commission recon~r~nds that the City Counci} approve the revised tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 80-20, Charter Point, subject to the condition that the applicant enters into an agreement to provide 3% of his units (6 unit.) for rent at rates affordable by families earning no more than the median in(ome in San Diego COunty as defined by the federal government ($17,700 per year at this time). In lieu of the provision of such housing on site, the applicant may make a payment equivalent to 3% of the market value of the project, such payment to be deposited into a fund designated for the purpose of providing low and moderate income housing. Alternatively, such housing may be provided in another location approved by the City Council. Such recommendation for approval is made subject to the following conditions: 1. The stands of Cleveland Sage shall be field staked to assure there will be no inadvertent damage by equipment operators. 2. Where a fill slope abuts the stands of Cleveland Sage, a drainage diversion device shall be installed to divert any runoff away from the stands. 3. Prior to any grading or clearing activities, a qualified field biologist shall be retained to carry out a program to dispurse individual burrowing owls nesting on the site. 4. A geologist shall be present during grading to observe all cut slopes for faulting or landsliding. 5. Parking of construction equipment and storage of building materials shall take place only on areas which are to be disturbed by project implementa- tion or on adjacent disturbed areas. 6. Prior to the recordation of the final map, a copy of the CC&R's shall be filed with the City making the City a party thereto. The CC&R's shall include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Prohibition against the installation of individual radio and T.V. antennas. b. Prohibition against any outside architectural remodeling without the approval of the City of Chu|a Vista. c. The developer and his successors in interest shall agree to maintain all landscaping, required fencing and recreation areas and buildings in a mann(~r satisfactory to the City of Chula Vista. 7. An irrevocable offer of dedication shall be given to the City for the major slope bank alon~t Otay Lakes Road. The deve]oper shall request the establishment of an open space maintenance district. Fees will not be =3- imposed upon the owners unless the above mentioned area is not maintained to standards acceptable to the City Council. In the event such a deter- mination is made in the future, the City Council may impose any necessary fees to insure a satisfactory level of maintenance. This condition shall be stipulated in the CC&R's. 8. Tile or brick shall be substituted for stamped concrete for paving material. 9. Street trees along Otay Lakes Road and Telegraph Canyon Road shall incorporate flowering trees in the foreground and eucalyptus trees in the background. 10. The transition planting areas bridging the natural topography with manu- factured slopes shall incorporate additional native shrub planting. l). Guest parking shall be reduced to provide additional planting. 12. Additional floorscape paving shall be added at "key" transition or road changes and may be included within the public rigbt-of-way, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 13. Paving areas shall be enhanced with creative curb designs and textures. 14. Final plant selection will be subject to the approval of the City Land- scape Architect. 15. The entrance to Apache Drive at Otay Lakes Road shall be aligned with, the proposed access to the project east of Otay Lakes Road. 16. Apache Drive shall be designed in accordance with residential collector street standards. Where centerline radii are less than 325 feet no on- street parking shall be permitted except on the outside of curves as approved by the City Engineer. 17. Prior to occupancy of any of the residences, four lanes shall be provided for Telegraph Canyon Road from approximately Station 69+50, as shown on Chula Vista {)tawing No. 78-345D, to Otay Lakes Road. The four lanes to be provided shall include, but not be limited to, a minimum of 5Z feet of pavement and an A.C. berm or curb and gutter on each side. These improve- ments shall be situated in such a way as to provide ultimate improvements in the north half of Telegraph Canyon Road adjacent to the property. Sufficient information regarding the location of the ultimate right-of-way, with respect to the existing 60 feet of right-of-way, shall be provided to the City Engineer for review prior to approval of the final map to ensure that the alignment is consistent with other projects in the area. -4- 18. The developer shall dedicate to the City sufficient right-of-way along Otay Lakes Road adjacent to the property to provide a total of 40 feet from the centeKline of said road to the property line. An additional dedication of right-of-way may be required at the southeast corner of the project to provide for turning mevements. The developer shall also dedicate to th(~ City sufficient right-of-way along Telegraph Canyon Road adjacent to th(, property to provide for the four lanes mentioned in item 17. 19. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of full street improvements, including any necessary transitions, on the west half of Otay Lakes Road adjacent to the property as shown on the typical section on the tentative map. The developer shall also be responsible for full street fm~rove~)ents along Telegraph Canyon Road adjacent to the'property to provide the four lanes mentioned in item 17. 20. A minimum unobstructed sight distance of 300 feet shall be provided along Apache Drive f(~r a car on the driveway just west of Otay Lakes Road on the south side of Apache Drive. 21. Alley type approaches with minimum 15 foot radii shall be provided at the entrances to all parking areas. 22. The developers shall enter into a separate agreement with the City of Chula Vista stipulating that they or their successors in interest shall be required to participate in a reimbursement or other district for the construction of Telegraph Canyon Road prior to t he approval of the final map. 23. The developer shall grant an easement to the subsequent owners of the property located west of building 55 and north of building 16. The width of said easement shall be approved by the City Engineer. 24. The entire storm drain system, including locations and sizes of all facilities, sh~ll be approved by the City Engineer as a part of the final grading and improvement plans. 25. Drainage from pads shall not be permitted to flow over slopes to adjacent pads or properties. 26. During the progress of land development operations, the developer shall take all precautions reasonably necessary to protect adjacent p~operty from damage duo to erosion, flooding, silting and other storm related hazards which ~re a consequence of his operation. Measures to mitigate the above mentioned hazards shall be incorporated into the final grading plan. 27. The developer shall grant easements to the City for street tree planting and maintenance along dedicated streets as determined by the City Engineer. 28. All mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report for this project shall be incorporated into the development work. 29. The developer shall grant to the City, by grant deed, the one foot control lot as shown (~n the tentative map. 30. An overall liuhttng plan for the private driveways shall be submitted to the City Traffic Engineer for approval prior to approval of the final map. 31. Two fi re hydrants shall be provided wi thin the 1.5 acre area; fi re flow requirements to be the same as for the other hydrants. 32. The developer shall grant a 10-foot sewer easement parallel to the proposed public sewer serving Lots 67-70. The Planning Corm~ission directs that this resolution be forwarded to the City Council and a copy be sent to the applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANNING COII4ISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA this loth day of September, 1980, by the following vote, to-wit: SERVICE STATION' 8HOPPING ( VAC VAC ~; CHARTER POIN'~ PCS 80 20 vAc VAC v^c RD AGRI~RAL / ~CULTUR~ PCS 80 EXHIBIT A City Planning Commission Agenda Items for Meeting of September lO, 1980 Page 4 2. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional use permit PCC-81-3, request to locate psschiatric hospital at 730 Dora Lane - Vista Hill Hospital A. BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting a continuance of this item until October 22, 1980 in order to satisfy the environmental concerns of the proposed project regarding the grading of the site. In addition, the State Department of Health Planning is expected to make a decision to approve or deny the project before the applicant proceeds with additional working drawings. B. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a motion to continue this item until October 22, 1980. City Planning Commission Agenda Items for Meeting of September 10, 1980 Page 5 3. PUBLIC HEARING (cont.): Conditional use permit PCC-80-21, request for expansion of existing mini-shop at 196 Broadway - Atlantic Richfield Compan~ A. BACKGROUND 1. This item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of August 13, 1980 to allow the applicant to submit his plan before the full Commission (only six members were present at that meeting). 2. In addition, the Planning Commission discussed the possibility of the applicant working with the staff to develop a more acceptable site plan. However, a motion to direct the staff to provide additional review failed to carry by a vote of 3-3. 3. In view of the tie vote the staff felt it would be in the best of everyone to meet with the applicant to attempt to resolve or, at least, reduce areas of disagreement. A meeting was held with the applicant who is now preparing revised drawings to resolve certain difficulties expressed by staff. B. RECOMMENDATION Continue the public hearing to September 24, 1980. City Planning Comission Agenda Items for Meeting of September 10, 1980 Page 6 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of revocation of conditional use permit C-67-22 for operation of car wash facility at 215 Woodlawn - Dennis Gray, operator A. BACKGROUND 1. In 1967 a conditional use permit (C-67-22) was granted for the operation of a self service car wash facility at 215 Woodlawn Avenue in the C-T zone. In October 1976, an additional conditional use permit, PCC-76-18, was granted to allow for the expansion of the facility by adding approximately 1400 sq. ft. to the existing building. It was noted in the staff report that a substantial portion of the roof and side panels were removed, partially in response to damage caused by overheight vehicles using the facility. The permit for expansion was not utilized and it has since expired. 2. In August of 1977 the owner, Mr. Gray, was informed that his conditional use permit for the expansion was due to expire and that if he no longer planned to proceed with the expansion he would be required to refurbish the structure to its original condition. In July 1979, Mr. Gray was given 30 days notice to commence the repairs. Mr. Gray then submitted a letter requesting a 120 day stay so that he could pursue the possibility of redeveloping the property in conjunction with the adjacent property to the north. Mr. Gray stated that repairs would begin in December, 1979 if the redevelopment plans were unsuccessful. The redevelopment plans never material- ized and in January 1980 Mr. Gray sold the property to Mr. and Mrs. Don Ledsam. 3. Staff recently met with the Ledsam's who indicated they were informed by Mr. Gray that there were certain unresolved problems with the city, however, they were confident that they could be corrected. The Ledsam's have indicated to the staff that they have been trying to secure a loan to expand the present facility into a 4-bay system (that will require approval of a conditional use permit). 4. Since no corrective action has taken place on the site, the City Attorney's office sent a letter to the owners on July 31, 1980 noting that if action were not taken in 10 days the matter would be scheduled for hearing before the Planning Com- mission for consideration of whether the permit should be revoked and operations ceased for noncompliance with conditions of approval. 5. The staff is of the opinion that sufficient time and opportunity has been given to the previous owner to comply with the conditions and regulations of the code, but he has failed to do so. However, the new owners are apparently making a sincere effort to remodel or expand the facility. B. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a motion specifying that by November 26, 1980 one of the following two items shall be accomplished: 1. The building shall be restored to its original condition or modified as approved by the Director of Planning. 2. The applicant shall have applied for and received authorization to expand the facility with construction to occur based on an approved schedule. City Planning Commission Agenda Items for Meeting of September 10, 1980 Page 7 Failure to comply with either condition #1 or #2 listed above will automatically constitute the revocation of conditional use pemit C-67-22 for a self service car wash facility at 215 Woodlawn. All operations at the site shall cease and the site shall be cleared of all structures within 60 days after said revocation. LOCATOR ~,_ ~ PCC'-76-1B - EXPANSION OF EXIS'E CARWASH AVE. EXIST. .-~ ..... 56'-6"- ~-- 49' , --- 44'-6" ASPHALt £A SEMEN l* ~50' EXHIBIT A PCC-?~s- ~8 PROPOSED EXPANSION OF CARWASH -;~15 WOOOLAWN AVE.